<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; Steve Sjuggerud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/dr-steve-sjuggerud/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:07:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Steve Leuthold: Best U.S. Fund Manager This Year</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/want-a-guaranteed-profit-follow-this-mans-advice/3810</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/want-a-guaranteed-profit-follow-this-mans-advice/3810#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sjuggerud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bear market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downturn Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GRZZX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Leuthold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Sjuggerud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/want-a-guaranteed-profit-follow-this-mans-advice/3810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t know the name <strong>Steve Leuthold</strong> yet, you should.  A few years ago, Leuthold made 450 percent gains by betting on commodities &#8211; by being bold enough to take a big position when nobody else dared to.</p>
<p>Leuthold also knows how to invest in stocks &#8211; his his <strong>Grizzly Short Fund</strong> (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=GRZZX">GRZZX</a>) has been top of the stock funds over the last 12 months.</p>
<p>If you stick with Steve Leuthold&#8217;s advice, says <a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/dr-steve-sjuggerud/"  class="alinks_links">Steve Sjuggerud</a> in <a href="http://www.dailywealth.com"  class="alinks_links">DailyWealth</a>, you&#8217;re be well on your way to bumper profits&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Greetings today from Minneapolis, Minnesota – home of one  of <em>DailyWealth</em>&#8217;s favorite investment advisors, Steve Leuthold&#8230;Mr. Leuthold never ceases to amaze us. He&#8217;s done it for  30 years now&#8230;</p>
<p>Today, one of his mutual funds is<strong> the best-performing U.S. stock fund&#8230;</strong></p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t know the name <strong>Steve Leuthold</strong> yet, you should.  A few years ago, Leuthold made 450 percent gains by betting on commodities &#8211; by being bold enough to take a big position when nobody else dared to.</p>
<p>Leuthold also knows how to invest in stocks &#8211; his his <strong>Grizzly Short Fund</strong> (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=GRZZX">GRZZX</a>) has been top of the stock funds over the last 12 months.</p>
<p>If you stick with Steve Leuthold&#8217;s advice, says <a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/dr-steve-sjuggerud/"  class="alinks_links">Steve Sjuggerud</a> in <a href="http://www.dailywealth.com"  class="alinks_links">DailyWealth</a>, you&#8217;re be well on your way to bumper profits&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Greetings today from Minneapolis, Minnesota – home of one  of <em>DailyWealth</em>&#8217;s favorite investment advisors, Steve Leuthold&#8230;Mr. Leuthold never ceases to amaze us. He&#8217;s done it for  30 years now&#8230;</p>
<p>Today, one of his mutual funds is<strong> the best-performing U.S. stock fund over the last 12 months</strong>. It  ranked No. 1 on Morningstar&#8217;s list of 19,500 mutual funds – an exceptional  performance.</p>
<p>And nearly 30 years ago, he wrote the exceptionally prophetic  book <em>The Myths of Inflation</em>. Back in 1980, contrary to every other prognosticator out there, Leuthold was optimistic. He predicted inflation would fall to 3%. He predicted oil prices would calm down. And he predicted stocks and bonds would perform well. It was just brilliant stuff.</p>
<p>It was so brilliant that, after reading it, <em>DailyWealth</em>&#8217;s  own <a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/tom-dyson/"  class="alinks_links">Tom Dyson</a> felt compelled to <a href="http://www.dailywealth.com/archive/2006/mar/2006_mar_29.asp" target="_blank">fly into Minneapolis</a> just to meet with Leuthold&#8217;s contrarian research firm, the Leuthold Group. On my trip to the &#8220;North Country&#8221; this year, I chose not to bother the Leuthold guys. Instead, I&#8217;m in the Minneapolis airport, headed home after a quick vacation with my wife and kids. (My father grew up in Northern Wisconsin, and my parents now have a lake house there. My wife and I brought the kids up for a few days.)</p>
<p>A few years ago, Steve Leuthold made a huge bet on commodities. He bought tons of commodities&#8230; literally! Leuthold was the only fund manager I&#8217;m aware of who was actually stockpiling tons of base metals in warehouses. </p>
<p>He recently just closed out his fund&#8217;s position in commodity-related stocks with something like a 450% return in just a few years. (I don&#8217;t have the stats on this trade with me here in the airport&#8230; But trust me, the returns were exceptional.)</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- Advertisement &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
<strong>There&#8217;s a simple 2-word secret to generating bigger, faster gains on every trade you make.</strong></p>
<p>In fact, most of the world&#8217;s richest traders use it to grow and protect their wealth&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8230; Like the legendary David Ryan &#8211; who used this secret to win the prestigious U.S. Investing Championship 3 times with a remarkable 3-year return of 1,379%.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.tradestops.com/sr001.asp" target="_blank">Click here</a> to learn how you can use it.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Leuthold not only got the<em> call</em> right on commodities,  he got the<em> trade</em> right, too. He really maximized his  profit&#8230; </p>
<p>He was bold enough to take a big position when nobody else wanted to. And then he had the stomach to hold on for a long time, when other value investors would have gotten scared out of the trade.</p>
<p>Leuthold also brilliantly took a big short position in financial stocks in his Grizzly Short Fund (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=GRZZX">GRZZX</a>). That bold position pushed the Grizzly Fund to the top spot in stock funds over the last 12 months. </p>
<p>So his Grizzly Fund is at the top of the list now&#8230; But Leuthold makes bets in both directions. So maybe another of his funds will be No. 1 down the road. (For more on Steve Leuthold and his funds, <a href="http://www.leutholdfunds.com/about_us_managers_detail.cfm?oid=102608" target="_blank">click  here</a>.) </p>
<p>He told <em>Barron&#8217;s</em>, &#8220;Our valuation models are indicating that there is not a huge amount of downside risk&#8221; in stocks right now. But as far as I know, he doesn&#8217;t have a big call at the moment. According to <em>Barron&#8217;s</em>, Leuthold is currently &#8220;neutral&#8221; on the markets. It&#8217;s not for a lack of looking&#8230; Leuthold just spent weeks traversing China sizing up its investment prospects.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailywealth.com/sdw_resources.asp" target="_blank">The<em> DailyWealth</em> list</a> of legitimate &#8220;market experts&#8221; is  surprisingly short. One of the few names on that list is Steve Leuthold.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s done his homework and made prescient calls for 30 years&#8230; from calling the end of inflation in 1980, to stuffing warehouses with commodities a few years ago, to betting against financials lately.</p>
<p>When you see comments from Steve Leuthold or the Leuthold  Group, stop and listen. You&#8217;ll probably hear some great advice&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.dailywealth.com/archive/2008/jul/2008_jul_15.asp">Source:  The Best-Performing Stock Manager in America This Year</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/want-a-guaranteed-profit-follow-this-mans-advice/3810/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This One Simple Table Could Make You Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/this-one-simple-table-could-make-you-rich/3570</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/this-one-simple-table-could-make-you-rich/3570#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sjuggerud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downturn Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Sjuggerud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/this-one-simple-table-could-make-you-rich/3570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Stocks are cheap. The question is: Are they getting cheaper? <a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/dr-steve-sjuggerud/"  class="alinks_links">Steve Sjuggerud</a> says it&#8217;s a strong possibility. He&#8217;s put together a table that shows how one generation becomes enamored with an investment trend and how that trend then goes bust. Right now commodities are the only game in town. This means we could be waiting a long time for stocks to pick-up&#8230; </p>
<blockquote><p>A few years ago here in <em><a href="http://www.dailywealth.com"  class="alinks_links">DailyWealth</a></em>, I shared what  I called the &#8220;<a href="http://www.dailywealth.com/archive/2005/2005_Dec_12.asp" target="_blank">Generation  Switch</a>&#8221; idea&#8230;  You see, investment themes move in cycles – or  &#8220;generations&#8221; – that last about 17 years or so. </p>
<p>One generation gets enamored with an investment idea, and it soars beyond reason. Then it busts, and the next generation gives up on it forever.&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stocks are cheap. The question is: Are they getting cheaper? <a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/dr-steve-sjuggerud/"  class="alinks_links">Steve Sjuggerud</a> says it&#8217;s a strong possibility. He&#8217;s put together a table that shows how one generation becomes enamored with an investment trend and how that trend then goes bust. Right now commodities are the only game in town. This means we could be waiting a long time for stocks to pick-up&#8230; </p>
<blockquote><p>A few years ago here in <em><a href="http://www.dailywealth.com"  class="alinks_links">DailyWealth</a></em>, I shared what  I called the &#8220;<a href="http://www.dailywealth.com/archive/2005/2005_Dec_12.asp" target="_blank">Generation  Switch</a>&#8221; idea&#8230;  You see, investment themes move in cycles – or  &#8220;generations&#8221; – that last about 17 years or so. </p>
<p>One generation gets enamored with an investment idea, and it soars beyond reason. Then it busts, and the next generation gives up on it forever. You can see it in the table from a few years ago: Triple-digit profits one generation, losses the next:</p></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<table width="90%" align="center" bgcolor="#000000" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<table width="100%" align="center" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1">
<tr bgcolor="#cccccc">
<td colspan="4" valign="top" align="center"><center>                         <strong>100 YEARS OF INVESTMENT GENERATIONS                        </strong>                       </center></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="28%" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center"><strong>Generation</strong> </p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="29%" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center"><strong>Commodities    (CRB Index)</strong> </p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="19%" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center"><strong>Stocks    (S&amp;P 500)</strong> </p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="24%" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center"><strong>Years</strong> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">1914-1930 </p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">-14% </p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">159% </p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">16* </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">1930-1947 </p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">244% </p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">-30% </p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">17 </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">1947-1965 </p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">-18% </p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">503% </p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">18 </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">1965-1981 </p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">123% </p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">35%^ </p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">16 </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">1981-1999 </p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">-9% </p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">1054% </p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">18 </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">1999-2016 </p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">?</p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">-? </p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="center">17 </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" align="right" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="left">* Data starts in 1914, so we    don&#8217;t have 17 years of data </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" align="right" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p align="left">^ While stocks had a small positive return for 1965-1981, if you  adjusted the number for inflation, it would be negative</p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>This one simple table would have made you rich&#8230;  </p>
<p>If you&#8217;d have sold your stocks and bought commodities at the end of 1999, you&#8217;d have made bigger profits than anyone you know this decade.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- Advertisement &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
<strong>Little-known company pays safe 21% dividend</strong></p>
<p>We recently uncovered a way to collect $3,350-$6,700 from an American oil company.</p>
<p>With oil prices hitting new highs each day, it&#8217;s no surprise that they&#8217;re sitting on $600 million in cash. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.stansberryresearch.com/pro/0807DIV670SP/EDIVJ713/200807REN-670-SP.html" target="_blank">Click here</a> to read more.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Commodities are up by triple digits since the end of 1999, and stocks are down in that time. The scary thought is&#8230; if the pattern holds, we could see stocks underperform until as late as 2016. </p>
<p>In my newsletter <em><a href="http://www.stansberryresearch.com/PRO/0802TRWSEC49/ETRWJ318/200802REN-SEC-49.html"  class="alinks_links">True Wealth</a></em>, we wait for  opportunity&#8230;  We buy things that are cheap, hated, and in the start of an  uptrend. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ll have to wait until 2016&#8230; but we haven&#8217;t seen the uptrends yet. It&#8217;s an understatement to say it&#8217;s an ugly market out there. We&#8217;re simply doing our best to avoid catching falling knives.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s best to wait for the falling knife to hit the ground and come to a stop before carefully picking it up. By waiting for the uptrend, we might miss the first 20%-25% of a move&#8230; but it&#8217;s completely the right way to go now. We can&#8217;t know where the bottom is.</p>
<p> Right now, I&#8217;m seeing more cheap and hated opportunities than I ever have in my career. That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m excited about. And that&#8217;s the positive thing about bear markets&#8230; They create value.</p>
<p>Many investments around the world are as cheap as I&#8217;ve seen them. Investors coming into the market in the next few years will get in at good values. And chances are, they&#8217;ll make money.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t go back and save people who didn&#8217;t read my writings back in 2000, when stocks were expensive. (In my January 2000 newsletter cover story, I said, <em>&#8220;We are at the peak of most likely the greatest financial mania that will ever be seen in our lifetimes and quite possibly the greatest ever witnessed.&#8221;</em>)</p>
<p>But I can tell you today, in 2008, stocks are as cheap as they&#8217;ve been in a long time. While they can (and likely will) get cheaper, I am excited. For the first time in many years, we&#8217;re seeing once-in-a-generation values.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.dailywealth.com/archive/2008/jul/2008_jul_08.asp">Source:  The One Positive Thing About This Bear Market</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/this-one-simple-table-could-make-you-rich/3570/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Barack Obama Is Elected Muni Bonds Will Soar</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/if-you-think-obama-will-be-president-buy-these-bonds/3468</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/if-you-think-obama-will-be-president-buy-these-bonds/3468#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sjuggerud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muni bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Sjuggerud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Bonds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/if-you-think-obama-will-be-president-buy-these-bonds/3468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Editor&#8217;s Note:</em> If someone offers you tax-free interest on your investment, you&#8217;ll probably be interested. If the rate is higher than your existing taxable one, you&#8217;ll bite their hand off. <a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/dr-steve-sjuggerud/"  class="alinks_links">Steve Sjuggerud</a> says municipal bonds offer just that, relative to their 10-year Treasury counterparts. And if Barack Obama is elected, Steve thinks these muni bonds will soar&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>If You Think Obama Will Be President, Buy These Bonds</strong></p>
<p>By Steve Sjuggerud</p>
<p>In my 13-year investment career, I&#8217;ve found there&#8217;s one thing you can always count on to stir up investment opportunities&#8230; the government.</p>
<p>For instance&#8230;  back in  2002, we bought an investment I called &#8220;virtual banks&#8221; in my <em>True  Wealth</em> advisory. These types of banks borrowed money at low rates, and lent it out at high rates through&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Editor&#8217;s Note:</em> If someone offers you tax-free interest on your investment, you&#8217;ll probably be interested. If the rate is higher than your existing taxable one, you&#8217;ll bite their hand off. <a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/dr-steve-sjuggerud/"  class="alinks_links">Steve Sjuggerud</a> says municipal bonds offer just that, relative to their 10-year Treasury counterparts. And if Barack Obama is elected, Steve thinks these muni bonds will soar&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>If You Think Obama Will Be President, Buy These Bonds</strong></p>
<p>By Steve Sjuggerud</p>
<p>In my 13-year investment career, I&#8217;ve found there&#8217;s one thing you can always count on to stir up investment opportunities&#8230; the government.</p>
<p>For instance&#8230;  back in  2002, we bought an investment I called &#8220;virtual banks&#8221; in my <em>True  Wealth</em> advisory. These types of banks borrowed money at low rates, and lent it out at high rates through government-guaranteed loans. Leverage ensured they could pay us safe, double-digit dividends.</p>
<p>We held the position a little over three years, and made more than 50%&#8230; all because the government guarantees many of the mortgages in America.</p>
<p>And take gold&#8230;</p>
<p>Gold coins, gold stocks, and gold ETFs have all made terrific gains in the past few years. Much of the gain has come from the flight out of paper money and into real assets. People simply don&#8217;t trust governments to manage their currencies&#8230;</p>
<p>Today, I&#8217;m going to tell you what could be the best government opportunity  you&#8217;ll hear about this year: Muni bonds.</p>
<p>Tax-free municipal bonds are more attractive than they&#8217;ve been in half a century, as I&#8217;ll show. And if you think Barrack Obama will be elected, then they&#8217;re even more attractive. Let me explain&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- Advertisement &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
<strong>What are you doing on Thursday, July 10th?</strong></p>
<p>This is the last day to take full advantage of what millionaire S&amp;A analyst Jeff Clark describes as: &#8220;The Single Best Income Strategy Ever Created.&#8221;</p>
<p>Free report explains the urgent details. <a href="http://www1.youreletters.com/t/1512011/29576349/1585230/0/" target="_blank">Click here</a>.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<wbr></wbr>&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Municipal bonds are very simple to understand. When a state needs to build a new toll road, for example, it issues a municipal bond to get the money to build it.</p>
<p>The U.S. government gives investors an offer they can&#8217;t refuse on municipal bonds&#8230; Investors don&#8217;t have to pay income taxes on the interest they earn on their bonds. So when interest rates are 6%, then tax-free municipal bonds ought to pay about 4%.</p>
<p>That&#8217;d make them about &#8220;equal&#8221; for high-end taxpayers. Once you pay taxes on your 6% interest, you&#8217;re left with about 4%. In essence, you&#8217;re no better or worse off with 6% taxable interest or 4% tax-free interest.</p>
<p>But today, we have a  crazy phenomenon&#8230;  Tax-free municipal bonds pay more interest than taxable  bonds.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true&#8230;  Tax-free  municipal bonds are paying about 4.6% tax-free.</p>
<p>Meanwhile 10-year Treasuries  are paying closer to 4.2%, taxable. This makes no sense&#8230;</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve hardly ever seen this in history. And right now, the opportunity is as good as it&#8217;s ever been. It could get even more attractive&#8230;</p>
<p>If Obama is elected, the  biggest investment winner could be tax-free municipal bonds.</p>
<p>You see, without a doubt, Obama will be raising income taxes on high-income families. For example, if your income is $1 million, and he raises income taxes by five percentage points, that&#8217;s an additional $50,000 in income tax you&#8217;ll pay.</p>
<p><strong>High-income families  will have a huge incentive to find ways to get tax-free income</strong>. And they&#8217;ll discover something many of them have never even looked at before: Municipal bonds&#8230; That&#8217;ll drive prices up significantly higher.</p>
<p>Of course, as the prices of bonds soar, you&#8217;ll have to pay taxes on those capital gains when you sell the bonds&#8230; but that means you made more money while collecting high returns tax-free. It&#8217;s a good problem to have!</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested in this idea, my advice is to find an ETF that bundles together a lot of individual muni bonds. Money manager Van Kampen has several good issues that do this for investors. Click to see a <a href="http://www.vankampen.com/vksite/prices/prices_ce.asp" target="_blank">full list of Van  Kampen&#8217;s muni funds</a>.</p>
<p>According to Van Kampen&#8217;s website, you&#8217;d need to earn 8.8%-9.25% in a taxable account (at the highest tax rates) to equal what Van Kampen is paying out on several of its funds (around 5.7% tax-free). You can find other muni-bond funds by typing &#8220;municipal&#8221; into the search box at <a href="http://www.etfconnect.com/" target="_blank">www.etfconnect.com</a>. This is a great website for  information on ETFs.</p>
<p>Where are you going to find a safe, taxable 8.8% to compete with 5.7% tax-free? I don&#8217;t know&#8230; and it&#8217;s my job to find these things. That tells me it&#8217;s time to buy municipal bonds!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailywealth.com/sdw_archive.asp">Source: If  You Think Obama Will Be President, Buy These Bonds</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/if-you-think-obama-will-be-president-buy-these-bonds/3468/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gas Prices Remain High for Fourth of July Weekend</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/gas-prices-remain-high-for-fourth-of-july-weeekend/3414</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/gas-prices-remain-high-for-fourth-of-july-weeekend/3414#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sjuggerud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Sjuggerud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XOM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/gas-prices-remain-high-for-fourth-of-july-weeekend/3414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No Independence Day for <a href="http://www.southtownstar.com/news/1035024,070208fourthtravel.article" title="Open a new browser window to learn more." target="_blank">gas prices</a>,&#8221; says Chigago&#8217;s The Southern Star, which is predicting that half a million less people will leave the city over the holiday weekend thanks to high gas prices.</p>
<p>The AAA annual Fourth of July travel forecast says different, according to the The Washington Times. It says <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/jul/02/gas-prices-not-a-deterrent-to-holiday-getaways/" title="Open a new browser window to learn more." target="_blank">record gas prices</a> and soaring airfares will deter few Americans from traveling over the holiday weekend.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailywealth.com"  class="alinks_links">DailyWealth</a> editor <a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/dr-steve-sjuggerud/"  class="alinks_links">Steve Sjuggerud</a> says be skeptical about anyone who claims to know where the price of oil or gas is going. But considering that oil has shot up tenfold in the last ten years and gas has only risen fourfold, Steve is surprised that we&#8217;re not already seeing higher gas prices.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;First, </em><em>nobody knows where the price of&#8230;</em></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No Independence Day for <a href="http://www.southtownstar.com/news/1035024,070208fourthtravel.article" title="Open a new browser window to learn more." target="_blank">gas prices</a>,&#8221; says Chigago&#8217;s The Southern Star, which is predicting that half a million less people will leave the city over the holiday weekend thanks to high gas prices.</p>
<p>The AAA annual Fourth of July travel forecast says different, according to the The Washington Times. It says <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/jul/02/gas-prices-not-a-deterrent-to-holiday-getaways/" title="Open a new browser window to learn more." target="_blank">record gas prices</a> and soaring airfares will deter few Americans from traveling over the holiday weekend.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailywealth.com"  class="alinks_links">DailyWealth</a> editor <a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/dr-steve-sjuggerud/"  class="alinks_links">Steve Sjuggerud</a> says be skeptical about anyone who claims to know where the price of oil or gas is going. But considering that oil has shot up tenfold in the last ten years and gas has only risen fourfold, Steve is surprised that we&#8217;re not already seeing higher gas prices.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;First, </em><em>nobody knows where the price of oil or  gas is headed.&#8221;</em> You should be extremely skeptical of anyone who says  otherwise. <em>&#8220;But here&#8217;s what I do  know&#8230;&#8221; </em>Then I shared with him some simple math:</p>
<p>To give you some perspective, I put together this chart:</p>
<table width="90%" align="center">
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"><strong>You think gas is expensive now? Consider this: </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"><img src="http://www.dailywealth.com/images/charts/2008/jul/20080701-chart_a.gif" alt="You think gas is expensive now? Consider this:" class="resize" /></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>The chart shows the price of a barrel of oil on the left scale, versus the price of a gallon of unleaded gas on the right scale.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- Advertisement &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
<strong>Two Simple Words that Could Make You Rich</strong></p>
<p>There&#8217;s a simple 2-word secret to generating bigger, faster gains on every trade you make.</p>
<p>In fact, most of the world&#8217;s richest traders use it to grow and protect their wealth&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8230; Like the legendary David Ryan – who used this secret to win the prestigious U.S. Investing Championship 3 times with a remarkable 3-year return of 1,379%.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.tradestops.com/sr001.asp" target="_blank">Click here</a> to learn how you can use it.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Adjusted for inflation, the price of unleaded gas had been relatively stable – around $2 a gallon – for nearly two decades. The price of oil adjusted for inflation had been somewhat stable as well&#8230; around $30 a barrel since 1986. </p>
<p>Then, boom! The price of oil shot higher. Yes, the price of gas has doubled from $2 to $4. But that&#8217;s nothing compared to oil&#8217;s massive moonshot.</p>
<p>When you realize that <strong>the  biggest part of the price of gas is the price of oil</strong>&#8230;  then you can easily  see how the price of gas can go higher from here.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s where your gas money goes&#8230; </p>
<table width="50%" align="center">
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.dailywealth.com/images/charts/2008/jul/20080701-chart_b.jpg" alt="You think gas is expensive now? Consider this:" class="resize" /></td>
</tr>
</table>
<table width="90%" align="center" cellpadding="3">
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">•</td>
<td>Mostly <strong>oil</strong> (75%).</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">•</td>
<td><strong>Refining</strong> (10%), which we can&#8217;t get rid of&#8230;  That&#8217;s how we turn oil into gas.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">•</td>
<td><strong>Distribution</strong>, etc. (only 5%)&#8230;  Hey, we&#8217;ve got to get the gas to you  at the pumps.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">•</td>
<td><strong>Taxes</strong> (10%)&#8230;  Yes, 40 cents of your $4 gas is taxes.</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Refiners, distributors, convenience stores, you name it, they&#8217;ve been squeezed trying to get you gas cheaply. {Exxon (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=exxon&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den">XOM</a>) is actually getting out of the service station business!} </p>
<p>The high price of oil is what&#8217;s done us in. <strong>Quite frankly, knowing what we know about  the price of oil, I&#8217;m surprised we&#8217;re not paying even more for gas now.</strong></p>
<p><em>&#8220;When  will we get relief from the high gas prices?&#8221;</em> I wish  I could be more optimistic with my friend the car dealer, and with you. But I  have to be honest&#8230; </p>
<p>When I size up the two pictures above, my simple answer to  you is <em>&#8220;not soon.&#8221;</em><br />
Source: <a href="http://www.dailywealth.com/archive/2008/jul/2008_jul_01.asp">The Real Numbers Behind High Gas Prices</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/gas-prices-remain-high-for-fourth-of-july-weeekend/3414/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Dumbest Tax Policy You Could Possibly Support</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-dumbest-tax-policy-you-could-possibly-support/3415</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-dumbest-tax-policy-you-could-possibly-support/3415#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sjuggerud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Hunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Sjuggerud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XOM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-dumbest-tax-policy-you-could-possibly-support/3415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Oil is skyrocketing&#8230; and Chevron (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ACVX">CVX</a>) and Exxon (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=exxon&#38;hl=en&#38;meta=hl%3Den">XOM</a>) should be making outrageous profit margins. So let&#8217;s tax those &#8220;windfall&#8221; profits! But&#8230; hold on a minute&#8230;</p>
<p>From March 2007 to March 2008, Exxon&#8217;s profit margin was  just 10%. Meanwhile, its income tax rate was about 43%.</p>
<p>Compare this with Microsoft:  Microsoft&#8217;s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AMSFT">MSFT</a>) profit margin was over 28%. And Microsoft&#8217;s tax rate was under 30%.</p>

<tr>


</tr><tr>


<p align="center"><strong>Exxon</strong></p>


<p align="center"><strong>Microsoft</strong></p>

</tr>
<tr>
2007 Profit Margin

<p align="center">10%</p>


<p align="center">28%</p>

</tr>
<tr>
2007 Tax Rate

<p align="center">42%</p>


<p align="center">30%</p>

</tr>




<p>Microsoft makes a much bigger profit margin than Exxon. And it&#8217;s taxed way less. Heck, if anyone deserves an &#8220;excess profits tax,&#8221; it&#8217;s Microsoft, not Exxon, right? </p>
<p>Do you think Microsoft&#8217;s Office software is outrageously expensive? And if so, is the right solution to tax Microsoft more? Does that fix&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oil is skyrocketing&#8230; and Chevron (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ACVX">CVX</a>) and Exxon (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=exxon&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den">XOM</a>) should be making outrageous profit margins. So let&#8217;s tax those &#8220;windfall&#8221; profits! But&#8230; hold on a minute&#8230;</p>
<p>From March 2007 to March 2008, Exxon&#8217;s profit margin was  just 10%. Meanwhile, its income tax rate was about 43%.</p>
<p>Compare this with Microsoft:  Microsoft&#8217;s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AMSFT">MSFT</a>) profit margin was over 28%. And Microsoft&#8217;s tax rate was under 30%.</p>
<table align="center" bgcolor="#000000" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="70%">
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<table align="center" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" width="100%">
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom"></td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>Exxon</strong></p>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center"><strong>Microsoft</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">2007 Profit Margin</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">10%</p>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">28%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">2007 Tax Rate</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">42%</p>
</td>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff" nowrap="nowrap" valign="bottom">
<p align="center">30%</p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Microsoft makes a much bigger profit margin than Exxon. And it&#8217;s taxed way less. Heck, if anyone deserves an &#8220;excess profits tax,&#8221; it&#8217;s Microsoft, not Exxon, right? </p>
<p>Do you think Microsoft&#8217;s Office software is outrageously expensive? And if so, is the right solution to tax Microsoft more? Does that fix the problem for consumers? </p>
<p>Right now, people just want to hear that the government is doing something to fix high gas prices. Many people naively believe the gas stations and Big Oil companies like Exxon are gouging them. </p>
<p>But calling for a windfall tax on Big Oil is among the dumbest policies you can possibly support&#8230; and there are a lot of dumb ones to consider.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/dr-steve-sjuggerud/"  class="alinks_links">Steve Sjuggerud</a></p>
<p><img src="http://www.dailywealth.com/images/bh_market_notes_title.gif" /></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.dailywealth.com/archive/2008/jul/2008_jul_01.asp">The Dumbest Tax Policy You Could Possibly Support</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-dumbest-tax-policy-you-could-possibly-support/3415/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corporate Bonds Are No Longer Boring</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/someone-will-make-a-lot-of-money-on-this-market-anomalymr/3244</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/someone-will-make-a-lot-of-money-on-this-market-anomalymr/3244#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sjuggerud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investing in bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LQD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RTPIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Sjuggerud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Bonds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/someone-will-make-a-lot-of-money-on-this-market-anomalymr/3244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Editor&#8217;s Note</em>: <a href="http://www.dailywealth.com"  class="alinks_links">DailyWealth</a>&#8217;s <a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/dr-steve-sjuggerud/"  class="alinks_links">Steve Sjuggerud</a> thinks there is an extraordinary opportunity for investors in the bond market.</p>
<p>The spread of yields between investment grade corporate bonds and treasury bonds is at its highest since 2002. Soon after that point came a sharp correction back to the long-running average.</p>
<p>A similar adjustment now, says Steve, will make someone a lot of money. He&#8217;s calling it a &#8220;once-in-a-generation opportunity&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Someone Will Make a Lot of Money on This Market Anomaly</strong></p>
<p>By Steve Sjuggerud</p>
<p>In the latest issue of <em><a href="http://www.stansberryresearch.com/PRO/0802TRWSEC49/ETRWJ318/200802REN-SEC-49.html"  class="alinks_links">True Wealth</a></em>, I shared with subscribers &#8220;<em>The Next Big Thing(s) – Nine ideas for a difficult market.</em> &#8220;To me, it&#8217;s exciting to be able to have that many unique opportunities to share. That&#8217;s the biggest unseen benefit of the rough market&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Editor&#8217;s Note</em>: <a href="http://www.dailywealth.com"  class="alinks_links">DailyWealth</a>&#8217;s <a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/dr-steve-sjuggerud/"  class="alinks_links">Steve Sjuggerud</a> thinks there is an extraordinary opportunity for investors in the bond market.</p>
<p>The spread of yields between investment grade corporate bonds and treasury bonds is at its highest since 2002. Soon after that point came a sharp correction back to the long-running average.</p>
<p>A similar adjustment now, says Steve, will make someone a lot of money. He&#8217;s calling it a &#8220;once-in-a-generation opportunity&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Someone Will Make a Lot of Money on This Market Anomaly</strong></p>
<p>By Steve Sjuggerud</p>
<p>In the latest issue of <em><a href="http://www.stansberryresearch.com/PRO/0802TRWSEC49/ETRWJ318/200802REN-SEC-49.html"  class="alinks_links">True Wealth</a></em>, I shared with subscribers &#8220;<em>The Next Big Thing(s) – Nine ideas for a difficult market.</em> &#8220;To me, it&#8217;s exciting to be able to have that many unique opportunities to share. That&#8217;s the biggest unseen benefit of the rough market we&#8217;ve had over the last 12 months.</p>
<p>The nine ideas I shared come from all over the globe, in all kinds of investments (stocks, bonds, and whatever else). So they&#8217;re not all correlated&#8230; If one doesn&#8217;t work, another will more than make up for it.</p>
<p>And I believe a few of those ideas will turn out to be &#8220;life changing&#8221; investments. The opportunities are that good. Most of them are &#8220;once in a generation&#8221; trades.</p>
<p>Today, I want to share with you yet another possible once-in-a-generation opportunity&#8230;</p>
<p>Right now, &#8220;investment grade&#8221; corporate bonds are as cheap as they&#8217;ve ever been, relative to Treasury bonds.</p>
<p>The only time we saw a similar anomaly in the last 50 years was in October 2002. It was a great buy signal&#8230;</p>
<p>In less than eight months, &#8220;boring&#8221; investment-grade bonds soared 19% in price. And don&#8217;t forget, the bonds were paying more than 7% (compared to just 4% in Treasury bonds)&#8230; So you&#8217;d have picked up a good amount of interest in addition to your capital gains.</p>
<p>Today, we&#8217;re seeing a nearly identical situation&#8230; Investment-grade corporate bonds are paying more than 7%, while Treasury bonds are paying around 4%. Take a look at the chart and you&#8217;ll see what I mean:</p>
<p><center><img src="http://www.dailywealth.com/images/charts/2008/jun/20080625-chart_a.gif" alt="Corporate Bonds: As attractive as they've ever been" class="resize" /></center><br />
Traditionally, investment-grade bonds have paid out only 25% more interest than Treasury bonds. So, for example, if Treasury bonds are paying 4% interest, then investment-grade corporate bonds would typically pay out only 5% interest.The difference between 4% and 5% isn&#8217;t huge&#8230; Treasury bonds are thought of as the ultimate safe investment. But investment-grade bonds are not usually considered particularly risky either.Today, however, investors are spooked. So now, investment-grade corporate bonds once again pay out more than 7% interest&#8230; nearly twice what Treasuries pay.This relationship could return to normal in two ways&#8230; Corporate-bond prices could soar, or Treasury prices could fall. Last time around (in late 2002 to mid 2003), both of these happened at the same time.This relationship will likely return to &#8220;normal&#8221; again – and someone will make a lot of money.The easiest way to buy a basket of investment-grade corporate bonds is through the iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Fund (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=lqd">LQD</a>). It generally holds a basket of 100 different investment-grade corporate bonds.But I&#8217;m not that bold&#8230; LQD has been hitting new lows daily. And we can&#8217;t know in advance how the relationship will return to normal (if corporate bonds will soar or if Treasuries will crash).</p>
<p>There&#8217;s another way to put the trade on&#8230; You could do it hedge-fund style, where you buy LQD and make the equal and opposite bet against Treasuries. One way to bet against Treasuries is through the ProFunds Rising Rates 10 (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=RTPIX&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den">RTPIX</a>), which will profit if Treasury prices fall.Again, I&#8217;m not bold enough for these trades yet. The trends are against me so far. And with all the turmoil in anything related to borrowing money, I can&#8217;t recommend getting in right now.</p>
<p>But it is an extraordinary anomaly&#8230; one we should only see once in a generation. Soon, we will have a safer moment to capitalize on it. Someday, someone will make a lot of money here. We&#8217;ll do our best to pick the right time to get in&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailywealth.com/archive/2008/jun/2008_jun_25.asp">Source: Someone Will Make a Lot of Money on This Market Anomaly </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/someone-will-make-a-lot-of-money-on-this-market-anomalymr/3244/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Hold Gold&#8230; Buy This Instead</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/dont-hold-gold-buy-this-instead/3117</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/dont-hold-gold-buy-this-instead/3117#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sjuggerud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gold Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Sjuggerud]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/dont-hold-gold-buy-this-instead/3117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you want to own gold, this is how you should do it&#8230;Quite frankly, it&#8217;s unbelievable&#8230;  Rare gold coins are  selling as close to melt value as they possibly can.</p>
<p>Take one of the real &#8220;blue chips&#8221; of the rare-coin world&#8230; the $20 Liberty, made over 100 years ago. It has just under an ounce of gold in it.</p>
<p>Back in 1989, the wholesale cost to dealers on this coin (graded &#8220;mint state 63,&#8221; or MS63) hit $1,600. The price of gold on that day was $366 per ounce. So in late May 1989, a dealer had to pay 4.4 times the price of gold to buy this coin.</p>
<p>Today – nearly 20 years later – the wholesale price on this coin is&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to own gold, this is how you should do it&#8230;Quite frankly, it&#8217;s unbelievable&#8230;  Rare gold coins are  selling as close to melt value as they possibly can.</p>
<p>Take one of the real &#8220;blue chips&#8221; of the rare-coin world&#8230; the $20 Liberty, made over 100 years ago. It has just under an ounce of gold in it.</p>
<p>Back in 1989, the wholesale cost to dealers on this coin (graded &#8220;mint state 63,&#8221; or MS63) hit $1,600. The price of gold on that day was $366 per ounce. So in late May 1989, a dealer had to pay 4.4 times the price of gold to buy this coin.</p>
<p>Today – nearly 20 years later – the wholesale price on this coin is a hair above the price of gold. There is practically no &#8220;collector&#8217;s premium&#8221; over the price of gold. It is ridiculous.</p>
<p>This is even more ridiculous: Some investors are buying South African gold Krugerrands and U.S. gold coins minted yesterday. These coins have no chance of trading at a premium to their melt value – they&#8217;re in near-infinite supply. The mints can simply make more of them to meet demand.</p>
<p>But if you&#8217;re buying MS63 graded $20 Liberties, you&#8217;re pretty much just paying the cost of getting it graded and the dealer markup. You&#8217;re paying nearly the same price as you are for modern gold coins.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- Advertisement &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
<strong>Don&#8217;t Lose this 9-Digit Code: 925335AD3</strong></p>
<p>To most people, the series of 9 numbers and letters above mean absolutely nothing.</p>
<p>But if you follow just one simple instruction&#8230; and relay this 9-digit Code to your broker&#8230; you are entitled, BY LAW, to receive as much as 181% in gains by June 15, 2009.</p>
<p>Surprisingly, the Code has nothing to do with stocks, mutual funds, gov&#8217;t bonds, options, or any other investment you&#8217;ve likely heard of&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stansberryresearch.com/pro/0806TINDIGSP/ETINJ632/200806TIN-LEG-SP.html" target="_blank">Click here</a> to learn more.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>At that price, sell your Krugerrands. They&#8217;ll never go up in value. They&#8217;ll always be worth the price of gold. Take those proceeds and buy some rare coins!</p>
<p>As I said, I think the $20 Liberties and similar coins are an incredible bargain right now. But when a bull market finally takes hold in rare coins (we&#8217;re overdue&#8230; it&#8217;s been 20 years!), these &#8220;low end&#8221; rare coins aren&#8217;t what take off. The rare stuff is what really zooms. </p>
<p>The last three rare-coin bull markets have seen gains of  348%, 1,195%, and 665%. When they do take off&#8230;  prices go nuts.</p>
<p>Right now, the rare-coin market can&#8217;t get any lower&#8230; Dealers are hardly making anything on these coins as it is. And the price of gold has sneaked above $900 again. In my newsletter, I&#8217;m returning our gold coins to a &#8220;buy.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re completely new to coins, then I suggest you read the new brochure that coin legend David Hall has posted on his website (<a href="http://www.davidhall.com/" target="_blank">www.davidhall.com</a>)  called &#8220;Long Term Wealth Builders.&#8221;</p>
<p>David works with coin dealer Van Simmons. Van has taught me more about making money in coins and collectibles than anyone. He&#8217;s more than a coin dealer&#8230; he&#8217;s a mentor of mine. </p>
<p>You can&#8217;t pick up the phone and call Warren Buffett for advice on stocks&#8230; or Bill Gross for advice on bonds. But the rare coins and collectibles world is small enough that you can pick up the phone and chat with the most knowledgeable man I know in collectibles. (You can reach Van at 800-759-7575 or <a href="mailto:info@davidhall.com">info@davidhall.com</a>.)</p>
<p>I am absolutely flabbergasted at how cheap rare coins are right now, trading closer to &#8220;melt value&#8221; than ever. You can make money in two ways here&#8230; If the price of gold goes up&#8230; or if the &#8220;collector&#8217;s premium&#8221; goes up (heck, it can&#8217;t go down from here).</p>
<p>My suggestion is to stick with a dealer you&#8217;re certain you can trust (Van is who I do business with)&#8230; and for the most potential for profit, buy a few exceptional coins instead of a large handful close to melt value.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not often you can buy an asset when it&#8217;s the cheapest in its recorded history. But that is the case, right now, in rare gold coins. Whether you buy or not, you&#8217;re doing yourself a disservice if you don&#8217;t at least consider the idea.</p>
<p>Good investing,</p>
<p>Steve</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.dailywealth.com/archive/2008/jun/2008_jun_20.asp">Don&#8217;t Hold Gold&#8230; Buy This Instead</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/dont-hold-gold-buy-this-instead/3117/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time for the Famous Nifty Fifty to Soar Again?</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/time-for-the-famous-nifty-fifty-to-soar-again/3084</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/time-for-the-famous-nifty-fifty-to-soar-again/3084#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sjuggerud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mutual funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nifty Fifty Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Share Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/time-for-the-famous-nifty-fifty-to-soar-again/3084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The name &#8220;Nifty Fifty&#8221; came to represent the  &#8220;one-decision&#8221; stocks of the early 1970s. They were the Cokes and the Disneys of the world&#8230; Fifty names you always bought simply because you couldn&#8217;t go wrong owning them. Or so investors thought&#8230;</p>
<p>Believe it or not, these &#8220;boring&#8221; names soared  in the early 1970s, reaching a dot-com style peak in 1972. </p>
<p>In 1972, Coke sold for 46 times earnings. And Disney was even more expensive, at 71 times earnings. Then, both stocks lost three-quarters of their value in two years. And these are just two examples. Similar losses occurred throughout the Nifty Fifty.</p>
<p>Looking back on the situation, <em>Forbes</em> magazine  said:</p>
<p><em>The delusion was that these companies were so good, it didn&#8217;t matter what you&#8230;</em></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The name &#8220;Nifty Fifty&#8221; came to represent the  &#8220;one-decision&#8221; stocks of the early 1970s. They were the Cokes and the Disneys of the world&#8230; Fifty names you always bought simply because you couldn&#8217;t go wrong owning them. Or so investors thought&#8230;</p>
<p>Believe it or not, these &#8220;boring&#8221; names soared  in the early 1970s, reaching a dot-com style peak in 1972. </p>
<p>In 1972, Coke sold for 46 times earnings. And Disney was even more expensive, at 71 times earnings. Then, both stocks lost three-quarters of their value in two years. And these are just two examples. Similar losses occurred throughout the Nifty Fifty.</p>
<p>Looking back on the situation, <em>Forbes</em> magazine  said:</p>
<p><em>The delusion was that these companies were so good, it didn&#8217;t matter what you paid for them; their inexorable growth would bail you out.</em></p>
<p><em>Obviously  the problem was not with the companies but with the temporary insanity of money  managers – proving again that <strong>stupidity  well-packaged can sound like wisdom</strong>. It was so easy to forget that <strong>no sizable company could possibly be worth  over 50 times normal earnings.</strong></em></p>
<p>But investors soon forgot what <em>Forbes</em> said about earnings, and history repeated in 1999. Coke and Disney soared to over 40 times earnings. Once again, people thought these companies were so good it didn&#8217;t matter what you paid for them. But once again, they were wrong&#8230; </p>
<p>Today – nine years later – the share prices of Coke and  Disney are down. But business at both has grown dramatically&#8230; meaning it just might be time to  pile  money into the  Nifty Fifty stocks again&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- Advertisement &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
<strong>Finally&#8230; A Safe Alternative to Stocks</strong></p>
<p>S&amp;A Research has been conducting a secret project over the past 4 months, getting the full details on an unusual investment&#8230;</p>
<p>It has nothing to do with stocks, gov&#8217;t bonds, mutual funds, or options. But this investment legally requires you to get paid 50% to 400% gains on precise dates in the future. </p>
<p>Recently, even <em>Barron&#8217;s</em> noticed this secret&#8230; saying, in the current market environment, this investment is &#8220;starting to look juicy.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www1.youreletters.com/t/1501405/29576349/1583703/0/" target="_blank">Click here</a> for details.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<wbr></wbr>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Even though its stock price is lower, Disney earns 3.5 times as much as it did in  1999. And Coke&#8217;s earnings have doubled. </p>
<p>So with earnings soaring, and the stock prices stagnant, these old Nifty Fifty shares are now cheap again – Disney sells for a price to earnings (P/E) of 13.6 times forward earnings and Coke for 17.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not just Coke and Disney&#8230;  Earnings for the New Nifty  Fifty Index (NFT on <a href="http://www.bigcharts.com/" target="_blank">www.bigcharts.com</a>) as a group have increased by over 100% since 1999&#8230; But the index is down since 1999. As a result, valuations have been cut in half&#8230; They&#8217;re cheap!</p>
<p>To explain just how cheap, Bloomberg lists the forward P/E ratio of the overall stock market at 16.25 (that&#8217;s the S&amp;P 500). But the forward P/E of the New Nifty Fifty Index is only 12.79.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to believe the Nifty Fifty won&#8217;t return to a premium to the overall market for one simple, brutal reason: Most companies won&#8217;t be around in 25 years. But I&#8217;d sure bet that in 25 years, families will still take their kids to Disney. And folks will still drink Coke.</p>
<p>I sincerely believe that, after nine years of terrible performance, the New Nifty Fifty stocks will beat the overall market over the next few years, as they simply work their way back to a premium to the overall stock market.</p>
<p>However, I can&#8217;t fully endorse buying up all these household names just yet. As you can see from this chart of NFT, the uptrend just isn&#8217;t there yet. </p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.dailywealth.com/images/charts/2008/jun/20080616-chart_a.gif" alt="NFT Daily" /></p>
<p>I have been burned fighting the trend in the last year. I  won&#8217;t buck it.</p>
<p>So, do I believe it&#8217;s time for the New Nifty Fifty to soar again? Yes. We should be just about there&#8230; But wait to see the uptrend before jumping in.</p>
<p>Good investing,</p>
<p>Steve<br />
<a href="http://www.dailywealth.com/sdw_archive.asp">Source: Time for the Famous Nifty Fifty to Soar Again?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/time-for-the-famous-nifty-fifty-to-soar-again/3084/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time to Buy These Tiny  Stocks?</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/time-to-buy-these-tiny-stocks/2923</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/time-to-buy-these-tiny-stocks/2923#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sjuggerud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citibank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiny Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/time-to-buy-these-tiny-stocks/2923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;Bank  stocks are getting extremely cheap,&#8221;</em> my friend Andrew told me  over breakfast yesterday.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;But  the big banks are about to get a whole lot cheaper.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Andrew should know. He&#8217;s the CFO of a publicly traded bank. He knows how banks work&#8230; He&#8217;s the one who decides what the bank does with its money. He explained how it&#8217;s feast or famine now in the banking business&#8230; It&#8217;s feast if you&#8217;re a small bank, like his. And it&#8217;s famine if you&#8217;re a big bank.</p>
<p><strong>Andrew  is so optimistic about small banks, he&#8217;s just invested a chunk of his own  savings in shares of tiny regional banks.</strong></p>
<p>But he won&#8217;t touch the big banks  like Citibank.</p>
<p>He says beyond the problems you  already know about, the big banks&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;Bank  stocks are getting extremely cheap,&#8221;</em> my friend Andrew told me  over breakfast yesterday.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;But  the big banks are about to get a whole lot cheaper.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Andrew should know. He&#8217;s the CFO of a publicly traded bank. He knows how banks work&#8230; He&#8217;s the one who decides what the bank does with its money. He explained how it&#8217;s feast or famine now in the banking business&#8230; It&#8217;s feast if you&#8217;re a small bank, like his. And it&#8217;s famine if you&#8217;re a big bank.</p>
<p><strong>Andrew  is so optimistic about small banks, he&#8217;s just invested a chunk of his own  savings in shares of tiny regional banks.</strong></p>
<p>But he won&#8217;t touch the big banks  like Citibank.</p>
<p>He says beyond the problems you  already know about, the big banks have two more crises ahead of them – <strong>commercial real estate loans</strong> and <strong>credit  cards</strong>. Let&#8217;s take a look at both&#8230; </p>
<p>When it comes to commercial real estate, banks are about to get hit with defaults here&#8230; You see, when a big bank makes a huge construction loan, it gets two years worth of interest payments in advance. Well, for many of those loans made at the top of the market, those two years are coming up.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- Advertisement &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
<strong>Save $2,000 on the Price of Our Research</strong></p>
<p>For the next 3 days only, we&#8217;re offering 50% off the price of the best-performing research advisory we publish. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested, we must hear from you by Tuesday, June 10 at the very latest. After this, this deal will expire.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stansberryresearch.com/PRO/0805SHRDOUSP/WSHRJ608/200805REN-MMM-SP.html" target="_blank">Click here</a> for more information.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>As Andrew explained, this could mean trouble&#8230; The big construction loan might have been made to build a shopping center to serve a new neighborhood&#8230; The problem is, that new neighborhood was either never built or it didn&#8217;t sell well. Therefore the shopping center was either never built or it has no tenants. Now, there&#8217;s a real chance the developer will walk away from the construction loan.</p>
<p>Andrew figures big banks are in big trouble with their  credit cards, too&#8230; </p>
<p>That&#8217;s because homeowners got used to taking a line of credit out on their home – a home-equity line. But once the real estate market turned, instead of cutting back on spending, homeowners turned to their credit cards.</p>
<p>Andrew told me the big banks moved too slowly here&#8230; It took &#8216;em a while to realize what was happening. Now they&#8217;ve pulled in those lines of credit. But Andrew thinks they were a few months too late.</p>
<p>So beyond the liquidity crisis&#8230; beyond the subprime crisis&#8230; beyond the housing crisis&#8230; the big banks have two more crises coming: commercial real estate loans and credit cards. </p>
<p><strong>The opportunity here is in the tiny banks instead.</strong></p>
<p>Andrew says the big banks have tightened up their lending standards so much, they&#8217;ll hardly make a loan. So Andrew, with his smaller banks, can make &#8220;slam dunk&#8221; loans all day&#8230; like jumbo loans to people with excellent credit and big down payments. </p>
<p>While it&#8217;s a worst-of-all-worlds environment for the big banks, the high-quality small banks – ones that simply stick to taking deposits and making safe loans – are in an ideal situation&#8230; </p>
<p align="left">The small banks have less competition (mortgage lenders have disappeared and big banks aren&#8217;t taking their customers). Now they can charge higher interest rates – and make bigger profits.</p>
<p>So is it time to buy bank stocks?</p>
<p>According to my banking insider, Andrew, it&#8217;s time to avoid the big bank stocks&#8230; and back up the truck on the little ones that simply take deposits and make safe local loans.</p>
<p>Good investing,</p>
<p>Steve</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.dailywealth.com/archive/2008/jun/2008_jun_06.asp">Time to Buy These Tiny  Stocks?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/time-to-buy-these-tiny-stocks/2923/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Housing Bust Is Over</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-housing-bust-is-over/2769</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-housing-bust-is-over/2769#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sjuggerud</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing bust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Median Home Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Payments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S housing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-housing-bust-is-over/2769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t believe all the gloom and doom you read&#8230; The U.S. housing bust may be just about over. We should be  darn close to the bottom&#8230; possibly within one year of it.You probably don&#8217;t believe me. That&#8217;s okay. I&#8217;m used to being the contrarian – it&#8217;s a position I prefer to be in actually. But bear with me, and at least hear me out&#8230; </p>
<p>Today, I&#8217;ll share with you two simple facts that explain where we are now in housing and why we could be close to the bottom. Let&#8217;s get right to it&#8230; </p>
<p><strong>1) Houses are affordable again.</strong></p>
<p>You may be flabbergasted to hear this&#8230;  But U.S. houses are  affordable again.</p>
<p>Since last summer, the change has been extraordinary. The  typical&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t believe all the gloom and doom you read&#8230; The U.S. housing bust may be just about over. We should be  darn close to the bottom&#8230; possibly within one year of it.You probably don&#8217;t believe me. That&#8217;s okay. I&#8217;m used to being the contrarian – it&#8217;s a position I prefer to be in actually. But bear with me, and at least hear me out&#8230; </p>
<p>Today, I&#8217;ll share with you two simple facts that explain where we are now in housing and why we could be close to the bottom. Let&#8217;s get right to it&#8230; </p>
<p><strong>1) Houses are affordable again.</strong></p>
<p>You may be flabbergasted to hear this&#8230;  But U.S. houses are  affordable again.</p>
<p>Since last summer, the change has been extraordinary. The  typical mortgage payment on the typical home in America now is <em>20% cheaper</em> than it was less than a year ago. Let me explain:</p>
<p>Last July, the median U.S. home would have cost you about $230,000. And you&#8217;d have paid about 7% in interest on your mortgage. So that&#8217;s a $1,200 monthly mortgage payment on that house (assuming a 20% down payment).</p>
<p>Today, the median home price is $200,000 – a $30,000  difference from last summer. And mortgage rates are down to 6%. </p>
<p>Between the lower price <em>and</em> the lower mortgage rate, you&#8217;d be paying less than $1,000 a month on your mortgage now – for the same house that would have cost you $1,200 last summer!</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- Advertisement &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
<strong>In the mailbag&#8230;  a secret worth $64,250</strong></p>
<p>Of the 1000s of letters we&#8217;ve come across in our daily mailbag, we&#8217;ve never found anything close to being this profitable&#8230; </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a secret, detailed in full by a handful of people around the country known as &#8220;Monday Morning Millionaires.&#8221; </p>
<p><a href="http://www.stansberryresearch.com/PRO/0805SHRDOUSP/WSHRJ600/200805REN-MMM-SP.html" target="_blank">Click here</a> for the amazing full story.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Most people shop for homes based on their mortgage payment&#8230; They ask, &#8220;How much can I afford each month?&#8221; And then they look for homes that will give them a payment they can afford. </p>
<p>So the big question is: <em>Can the typical household  afford the typical mortgage payments on a typical home? </em><strong>Last summer, the answer was no. But now, the answer is yes.</strong> Take a  look:</p>
<table align="center" width="90%">
<tr>
<td>
<p align="center"><strong>Already? Yes! Houses are affordable again&#8230;</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.dailywealth.com/images/charts/2008/jun/20080603-chart_b.gif" alt="Have we paid our dues yet?" class="resize" /></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>You may be surprised to hear it, but thanks to lower mortgage rates and lower home prices, homes are affordable&#8230; They&#8217;re just as affordable now as they were right before they boomed in the 2000s. </p>
<p align="left"><strong>2) We&#8217;ve paid our dues, pricewise.</strong></p>
<p>You may also be surprised to learn  home prices in  general don&#8217;t go up that much&#8230;  </p>
<p>The median U.S. home price has only risen at about 1.5% per year since the 1970s, after you subtract inflation. That&#8217;s not much of a gain. (Even that 1.5% price gain is overstated&#8230; Homes have gotten much larger since the 1970s.)</p>
<p>The annual increase in price has been consistent&#8230; Whenever prices run significantly above that trend, like in 1978 or 1987, they run significantly below that trend three to four years later.</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Have we paid our dues yet? </strong><img src="http://www.dailywealth.com/images/charts/2008/jun/20080603-chart_a.gif" alt="Have we paid our dues yet?" class="resize" /></p>
<p align="left">Cycles happen. You can see it easily in this chart. You can also see in 2005, prices ran farther above trend than any time in history. And now, in 2008, prices have fallen farther below trend than any time in history.</p>
<p>Could we see another year or two below trend? Of course. But I expect that we&#8217;re in the process of finishing &#8220;paying our dues.&#8221; We&#8217;ll return to the trend.</p>
<p><strong>In sum&#8230;   you may be surprised to hear it&#8230;  but</strong></p>
<table width="70%">
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top"><strong>1)</strong></td>
<td><strong>U.S. homes are once again affordable.</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top"><strong>2)</strong></td>
<td><strong>We&#8217;ve just about &#8220;paid our dues&#8221;  pricewise.</strong></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Don&#8217;t get caught up in the gloom and doom. Stick with the  simple facts.</p>
<p>These indicators are pretty simple. They show how the  worst of the housing bust could be behind us already.</p>
<p>Good investing,</p>
<p>Steve</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.dailywealth.com/archive/2008/jun/2008_jun_03.asp">The Housing Bust  Is Over </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-housing-bust-is-over/2769/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 2.325 seconds -->
