However, its overdependence on developed markets and a sluggish U.S. consumer are currently holding the company back.

Emerging markets are where growth is today. It’s clear that Heinz understands that, because emerging markets now account for about 14% of the company’s sales.  But the rate of Heinz’s emerging market sales growth is still disappointing.

Heinz has been growing this category, but only at a rate of about 1% to 2% of its total sales per year – even with the company’s brand acquisitions. And to make matters worse Heinz was hit with currency losses in its most recent quarter, and these currency dynamics will likely persist.

Heinz’s emphasis on China, Russia, India, as well as other emerging markets like Poland and the Middle East is encouraging.  But it is disappointing to see a lack of emphasis on Brazil.

In addition to the challenges Heinz faces in penetrating new markets, the company is up against strong headwinds at home. Heinz’s vulnerability to upswings in commodity prices poses a risk to margins.  And while Heinz has been confident enough in the strength of its brands to increase prices, more cash-strapped consumers are switching to generic brands to increase savings.  The result has been a 4% drop in volumes.  Consumer habits do not change easily, so this trend will be difficult to reverse.

Looking forward, the consumers in the United States and other advanced economies will remain weak.  American consumers, in particular, continue to struggle with high levels of debt, surging unemployment, and depleted nest eggs.  In fact, the wealth effect of seeing an average 15% drop in the value of their homes – which comprises some 70% of the equity of a typical U.S. household – and the huge drop in the equity markets – which represents another 20% of the wealth of households – has prompted consumers to increase their savings rate for the first time in decades.

The personal savings rateis near 5%, and it could exceed 8%.  This means that consumption will remain depressed and consumers will remain focused on cost savings for the foreseeable future.  Therefore, the shift at supermarkets to generic labels will continue.

This trend also will have a negative impact on Heinz’s food-service segment, which comprises almost 15% of its sales.   Food-service sales will suffer disproportionately as people stay more at home instead of dining out.

Longer term, as the U.S. and other advanced economies recover, and Heinz achieves stronger market penetrations in fast-growing markets, I believe it will indeed be able to produce above-average returns.  But in the meantime, very strong cashflows from its existing brands will support Heinz stock and allow the company to return an attractive dividend.

And right now, the 4.2% dividend yield that Heinz’s stock offers is very appetizing.  So long term holders should keep holding the stock.

However, the current headwinds for the company and challenges in the U.S. market, foreign exchange, commodity costs and other costs involved in penetrating new markets will keep limiting the stock’s appeal — even as a defensive play in down market periods.

The stock’s Price/Earnings to Growth (PEG) ratio, which is above 2, is a strong warning sign.  It says that buying at these levels is paying too high a premium for the Heinz’s earnings growth rate.  That is symptomatic of the headwinds in earnings that I mentioned previously.  Thus, it is not advisable to go into this stock right now.

I would stick with our many defensive stock recommendations, likeCampbell Soup Co. (NYSE: CPB), The Coca-Cola Co. (NYSE: KO)and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS), which have outperformed and are executing strongly in emerging economies.

Recommendation: Hold H.J. Heinz Co. (NYSE: HNZ) long term.  Short term-oriented buyers should abstain for the moment (**).

Source: H.J. Heinz Co. (NYSE: HNZ) Is a Long-Term Keeper, but Will Struggle in the Months Ahead

Unfortunately, that’s not the case. And that means Constellation will have to clear a number of hurdles if it’s going to fulfill its long-term promise.
Last year, the company bet big on higher energy prices and paid the price dearly when the economy collapsed.

Constellation’s very high level of debt, with large bond maturities in 2009 and 2012 at that time meant they were flirting with financial disaster.  That forced the company into a deal with Électricité de France SA (EDF), in which the European energy giant agreed to inject $4.5 billion into Constellation in exchange for almost 50% ownership of its nuclear plants.

That includes a brand new plant, Calvert Cliffs 3, that’s still subject to pending regulatory approval. Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley has convinced the Public Service Commission (PSC) to hold open, public hearings to determine if this new deal is in the public’s best interest.

One of the main points of contention is the two energy companies’ demand to access the cash at distributing subsidiary Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. (BGE).

“We know that BGE is a cash cow for Constellation Energy,” said Gov. O’Malley. “We know that BGE pays more than half of all dividends paid into Constellation Energy and has a huge impact on Constellation’s bottom line.  We also know that Constellation Energy has had a tumultuous history over these last few years.”

The Maryland governor also noted that Constellation last year lost 80% of its stock value and was just hours away from bankruptcy before EDF stepped in.

Potential construction costs associated with the new nuclear plant are another large uncertainty. Nuclear plants have the tendency to run over budget, and that means the utilities then come back to regulators asking for rate increases in order to fund the cost overruns.

On the other hand, EDF Vice President John Morris recently testified to the PSC that “a decision denying EDF’s application or imposing conditions on the approval of the application that cause it to fail, would bring an end to the development” of the project.

And the company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Pierre Gadonneix, told French lawmakers that EDF expects to get all the necessary approvals for this transaction by the end of the year.

The approval would generate strong economic gains for the state of Maryland, where EDF’s U.S. headquarters are based.

Électricité de France, a firm owned 84% by the French government has its own challenges.  Having bought British Energy Group PLC and embarked in other growth-oriented investments, it too got caught with too much debt. Like Constellation, EDF is in debt-reduction mode.  The company is rumored to be pondering the sale of another 20% stake in British Energy, a swap of electricity assets with German utility E.On AG and the possible float of another 14% of its own stock.

We must also factor in the possibility that destructive protectionism will affect the deal.  The Obama administration recently levied special import duties on Chinese tires.  When governments are forced to confront the tough realities of high unemployment, the likelihood that they resort to protectionism to boost local employment is high.  And this always conspires against efficiency and global growth.

Fortunately, there is no evidence of any such pressure playing a role yet.

In addition to the many uncertainties about the EDF deal and the Calvert Cliffs plant, we have to deal with regulatory uncertainties that are plaguing the industry.  Evolving environmental regulations will require large increases in capital investments.  These eventually are passed on to consumers, reducing demand.  In the months and years ahead, we might see so-called “cap-and-trade” legislation, smart grid systems and renewable portfolio standards that will complicate things even more in unpredictable ways.

The cap-and-trade legislation, should it pass, could benefit Constellation greatly.  If the United States made a stronger commitment to reducing carbon emissions, nuclear would have to be a big part of the equation. And Constellation already is well positioned to take advantage of this.  But while such regulation would be good for the company in the long run, right now it is just another uncertainty.

We also need to remember that a new nuclear power plant in the United States hasn’t been built in 20 years, so a new labor force and supply chain is needed.  And despite the fact that with the support of EDF, Constellation is the largest nuclear operator in the world, these challenges cannot be achieved overnight.

We are not going to go into the Constellation results in detail.  Demand was down in the United States in general, the summer was mild, and industrial demand – which is down between 3% and 7% in different regions – is not coming back yet.

Constellation has indeed taken steps to reduce its trading and other risks and divested several non-profitable operations.  The vast majority of Constellation’s June 30 earnings were due to special items that boosted GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) earnings.  The special one-time items from divested earnings accounted for about 60% of the strong upside adjustment. But they are not likely to recur, and in this complex business, some other one-time items have the unfortunate trait of appearing out of nowhere – just when it is least convenient to shareholders.

I love Constellation’s strong operating performance, its strong position in nuclear energy, and its focus on growing alternative energy.  These strengths are likely to play out well over the long term, and could even lead this company to superior profits down the line.  But there are too many uncertainties weighing on an already damaged balance sheet, which makes the risk for this company too large to bear in the short term.

If Constellation is hit by any one of these risks, another big hit to the stock could lead to another equity infusion.  And the traditional argument for buying utility stocks as an income investment does not work well either, given its low dividend yield and the company’s need to conserve cash.

So, with so much left to chance, I would not buy Constellation at this time. But there is enough long-term potential, that if I already owned Constellation stock, I would hold it for a while to see if those uncertainties are resolved. But be aware that holding the stock is an overly speculative position that needs to be monitored constantly for the developments that we outlined above.

Shares of Constellation Energy closed Friday down 1.45%, or 47 cents, at $31.84. The stock earlier this month hit a 52-week high of $33.37 after falling to a 52-week low of $15 in March.

Recommendation: Hold Constellation Energy Group Inc. (NYSE: CEG) (**).

Source: Constellation Energy Group Inc. Has Long-Term Potential, But Short-Term Problems

You see, the massive fiscal stimuli and ultra-easy money from the Fed does indeed have real effects on the economy.  Whether you want to call them artificial or real, the stimuli have moved and will continue to move profits, until it is withdrawn.  And the timing of the deployment of the fiscal and monetary stimuli, the timing of its positive effects and the timing of its eventual removal are uncertain.

In addition, we have many short-term uncertainties. The upcoming Group of 20 (G20) meeting has potentially important ramifications for the global financial system and for global currencies. We also will get more data about foreclosures, existing and new home sales and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.’s (FDIC) funding needs.  Finally, we have Damocles’ sword hanging over the market with the potential for additional deficit from President Obama’s healthcare reform.

So we are going to go for a safe play that enjoys a nice dividend and presents a compelling value proposition right now: Kimberly Clark Corp. (NYSE: KMB).

When in doubt, go for consumer staples.  And a superbly run Kimberly Clark will do the trick.  The stock has overcorrected recently, and the headwinds of soft consumer demand and volatile commodity costs are abating.  What’s more is that KMB’s major source of growth will continue to be emerging economies.

U.S. consumer activity is not as dead as it looks.  While unemployment is still climbing, the rate at which people are losing jobs is declining on a consistent basis.  Additionally, the pick-up in home sales and in the stock market is helping slowly reverse the negative wealth effect suffered from last year’s crash.  Programs like “Cash for Clunkers” and tax incentives for purchases of new homes are having a positive effect on those sectors and are generating increased incomes in the industries that benefit from them.

With respect to emerging markets, the situation is even more positive. Advanced economies are surely going to commit their support to emerging market growth at the G20 meeting in Pittsburgh this week.

This is good for KMB, because supportive trade and capital flows will help propel the main source of KMB’s growth.   Emerging markets have been giving KMB more than three times the growth than advanced economies have.  And the trend will continue.

It is easy to understand why.  For starters, it helps a lot to have much higher population growth.  Also, income growth is higher as the currencies appreciate, and people leave poverty to join the middle class at a much higher rate than in the advanced economies.

The expected rate of growth for next year in emerging markets will continue to accelerate and dwarf the rate of growth of the United States, Europe and Japan for years to come.

Growth rates in emerging economies are catching its self-sustaining levels, which should lead to further acceleration next year.  This has been my thesis since last October, when I called the turn on Brazil with my recommendation of the iShares MSCI Brazil Index (NYSE: EWZ), which has since doubled in value.

Then we have the issue of volatile commodity prices, which have led KMB to raise prices, hurting some demand.  KMB is taking further restructuring measures to address costs in short order.  This will improve profitability short term, and it will give the company a lasting competitive advantage.

What is critical for KMB’s success is their established brand leadership.  The company’s brand enjoys superior recognition and acceptance and creates sustainable competitive advantage in an industry that is little affected by economic mishaps.  This cements the defensive nature of our call.

Meanwhile, KMB’s price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio on estimated earnings is only about 11 times.  That makes the stock a gift for investors that could easily pay about 15 times for a name like this.  Adding to the allure of the value proposition is KMB’s generous dividend yield of more than 4%.  This dividend is supported by a mammoth cashflow that ensures that it is safe.  In fact, the dividend payout ratio is only 60%.

Rather than investing in U.S. Treasuries, why not own a stock of a company that will surely appreciate strongly over several years?

And there is yet another reason to buy KMB.  There is short interest that in this market is likely to get squeezed out of their positions.  By many measures, KMB is an attractive short-squeeze play.  Shorts typically increase their positions in defensive stocks in bullish markets in order to go long against highly cyclical stocks.  Now, close to year end, as we are right now, it is highly probable that they will be reversing their position in order to close their books for the year.

And for those lovers of technical analysis, this stock is a gem:

• Its 50-day exponential moving average crossed to the upside violently in mid-July and has been consolidating at these levels.
• The stock is sitting at the precise lower-end of the Bollinger bands.
• And, very importantly, it is way oversold by many key indicators.

So, this is a defensive stock that pays a generous 4.2% dividend yield, and enjoys an earnings surprise upside as it deals with headwinds.

Recommendation: Buy Kimberly Clark Corp. (NYSE: KMB) at market(**). I suggest you buy anywhere between one third to half of your position initially, and dollar cost average into a full position over the next four weeks.

(**) – Special Note of Disclosure: Horacio Marquez holds no interest in Kimberly Clark Corp.

Source: Kimberly Clark Corp. Offers a Strong Defensive Position and a Generous Dividend Yield

Fortunately for us, we foresaw this scenario a while ago. On April 20, I recommended that investors diversify their portfolios by adding the SPDR Gold Trust ETF (NYSE: GLD).  The fund is up about 14% since that recommendation, but it’s not yet time to sell, as there are still a number of factors working in gold’s favor.

For starters, there is more and more talk of the U.S. dollar losing some of its luster as a reserve currency.  But this debate is moot for the moment.  The reality is that it will take a long time to reduce the preeminent role of the dollar as the store of value of choice for central banks around the world.

Earlier in March and later in June, Zhou Xiaochuan, governor of the People’s Bank of China made a pitch for the creation of an international global currency delinked from sovereign currencies.  This increased speculation about the probability of China deemphasizing the dollar within their extraordinary high foreign reserves of almost $2 trillion.

Some 64% of global reserves are in U.S. dollars, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). So if China and other holders of U.S. debt were to reduce their holdings, it would have a substantial impact on the greenback’s value, as well as on U.S. interest rates, given that those countries would be selling U.S. Treasuries.

Zhou suggested the use of the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) as an alternative. The SDR is a currency linked to a basket of four major international currencies in the following approximate weightings: U.S. dollar (44%), euro (34%), Japanese yen (11%) and British pound (11%).

But the reality is that this would be highly impractical. To begin with, there are almost no instruments denominated in SDRs that China and other countries could invest their reserves.  And if the IMF issues the instruments, then it would be taking the other side of the trade, which means it would have to start lending in SDRs, too.  This is very unlikely.

Furthermore, no other currency on the planet is large enough to serve as the world’s main reserve currency.  The sole exception, in terms of having a comparable size of the economy, is the euro.  The euro serves 16 members countries of the European Union (EU) and a few others peg their currency to it.  But the problem with the euro is that even though the entire EU is comparable in size to the United States, it is comprised of many countries with very different fundamental strengths and weaknesses.

Therefore, each of these countries issues bonds and each of these, by themselves, are too small and offer too little liquidity for central banks to accumulate as reserves.

But right now – given the large size of the current and projected U.S. deficits and the easy monetary policy – the incentives for holding dollars have diminished.  The risk that inflationary pressures will build up next year, and in turn lead to higher interest rates, are not negligible, even though the U.S. Federal Reserve keeps assuring the markets that it will stifle these pressures before they materialize.

Last Friday, John Taylor, a renowned economist and an expert in monetary policy, opined that the Fed would need to start raising interest rates in early 2010 in order to stem price pressures.

In the meantime, emerging markets such as China and Russia complain about the vulnerabilities of the U.S. dollar.  But these visible complaints have to be construed merely as verbal intervention.  These countries are acting in their own self-interest, because they have very large holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds.  They are trying to “encourage” both the Fed and the U.S. government to act very prudently and conservatively with monetary and fiscal policy.

The United States has offered plenty of assurances to China that it will remain vigilant about inflation. But the trick is being able to identify these inflationary pressures and to take action way before the actual inflationary pressures become entrenched in the economy.  And the Fed will need to rely on its projections to do that.

In this uncertain environment, making economic projections is much easier said than done.  And one would rather err on the side of being a bit late in raising interest rates and reducing quantitative easing. If the Fed is slower than needed, and some inflationary pressures build, it they can resort to raising rates a bit faster and resolve the problem. But if the central bank raises rates – and reduces the quantitative easing policy too soon – it could send the economy into another recession.

This could be problematic since it would increase the risk of the U.S. economy falling into a deflationary spiral and put additional pressure on the U.S. financial system.  Therefore, it seems reasonable to assume that the Fed has greater incentive to err on the lenient side than on the hawkish side.

Remember that we are not out of the woods by any means.  Unemployment, which is a lagging indicator, is still increasing and there are many other large problems to resolve in the economy. Without even considering the impact that healthcare reform will have on the U.S. budget deficit, we see the following important headwinds:

• Consumers are very weak.  It’s not just the jobless that have been affected.  The uncertainty about continued employment for those who still have jobs led to an increase savings rates as would be consumers postpone spending.
• The huge drop in home prices has put about one in four homes in an “upside down” mortgage situation. That means consumers cannot sell their houses without taking a loss, and cannot borrow against their homes to make other expenditures.
• The drop in home values has had another effect:  It has increased the need for consumers to save.  This need has been reinforced by the large hit to 401(k) savings and other retirement plans.  As a result, savings rates have zoomed to 7% of personal income. The savings rate could even hit 10% as consumers strive to rebuild their nest eggs.  Additionally, the “Baby Boom” generation has saved too little and retirement is just around the corner.  Consumers make some two thirds of the U.S. economy, so this new predisposition to saving will be a drag on consumption for a long time.
• Capacity utilization is still low, which greatly reduces producer pricing power.  This, along with very high unemployment, gives the Fed time for now.  Low capacity utilization also keeps investments in factory expansion low.
• Recent banking data revealed that many smaller U.S. banks will be closing their doors, taxing the already overstretched resources of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), which will have to be recapitalized, adding to the U.S. fiscal deficit.
• We have not yet seen the fallout from the commercial real estate drop, which Money Morning has warned will be severe.  Since the U.S. consumer is not buying as much, many properties will not be able to keep up with their payments and will default on their loans.  Commercial real estate generally follows the trends in residential real estate with one or two years of lag.
• Last, but not least, we are going to see an economic acceleration in the United States in the third quarter, but that acceleration might be driven to a large extent by inventory rebuilding.  The U.S. economy will probably surprise to the upside in the third quarter with growth.  Among other things, the government’s Car Allowance Rebate System (CARS), popularly known as “Cash for Clunkers,” should show up positively in the numbers.  But once the levels of inventories are brought up to their necessary levels, that extra growth will not be present in the following quarter.  And the demand from Cash for Clunkers will cease to be a factor.

All of these reasons warrant caution for the Fed.  Some economists, including Nobel Prize winner and former World Bank Chief Economist Joseph Stiglitz, have highlighted the risk of a “W-shaped” recession/recovery scenario, and have even suggested the need for another stimulus package.  While that might do more harm than good, this position highlights the dovish bias that the Fed is likely to maintain.

What About the Rest of the World?

China enjoys many degrees of freedom to move its economy forward and has had resounding success in doing so.  It has no debt and more than $2 trillion in foreign currency reserves.  Its banking system is small in relation to the size of its economy, which gives the country a lot of room to expand credit, and the savings rate of its consumers is sky-high.  This leaves China with the capital resources to deploy growth strategies.  Since the largest companies are all government-owned, when the government decides to deploy capital, it gets done swiftly and powerfully throughout the economy, with great effect on growth.

As a result, China’s economy grew at the breakneck annualized pace of 14% in the second quarter.

Other emerging markets, like Brazil and India, are in similar, though not as potent, positions to move their economies forward. And they are doing so aggressively. India is expected to post on average 7% plus of annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth.

Emerging economies – those that did not splurge the bonanza of the prior five years of strong growth in commodity prices and other exports — are now in the position of stimulating their economies with easy monetary and fiscal policies.

Massive stimulus packages, the scorching demand growth from capital investments, and reborn consumers in emerging Asia, have combined to rekindle global growth.

Resurgent Growth in Europe

Both Europe and Japan are emerging from their recessions – even though Japan may post a negative growth number in the fourth quarter – and Britain and Italy are lagging behind in the recovery.  But the most important European economies, led by Germany and France, are pulling ahead.

It is understandable that European Central Bank (ECB) President Jean Claude Trichet, recently mentioned that the recovery was uneven in Europe.  Most market pundits took this as a sign that Europe would not be raising rates as fast as previously anticipated.

However, keeping interest rates low is much harder to do than it is to say.  Unlike the Fed, which has symmetric objectives – promoting economic growth and controlling inflation – the ECB’s only mandate is to control inflation.  The reason for this notable difference in objectives is that the European economy is much less flexible than the American economy, mainly due to its very rigid labor laws and other regulations.

Thus, the Europeans start running into inflationary problems when their economy grows above 2.5%.

The ECB just raised its own growth forecasts.  Similarly, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), which comprises the 30 most influential free-market representative democracies, indicated that the global recession is coming to an end much faster then they previously thought, but said that the recovery will rely on massive spending and low interest rates for some time.  The OECD cited the strong rebound in Asian economies as having jumpstarted this global reacceleration.

Because the Federal Reserve will have to err on the cautious side, and because of the institutions’ differing mandates, the ECB will probably tighten monetary policy before the U.S. central bank does. That means the euro and emerging market currencies will keep appreciating against the U.S. dollar and the price of gold will soar.

The protests that will come from time to time from Chin and Russia will be just that: verbal intervention.  They will not resort to sudden changes in the composition of their foreign reserves, at the risk of doing further damage to the dollar.

In fact, China and other countries generate some 90% of their large current account surpluses in U.S. dollars.  But their holdings of dollar-denominated assets are only about 64% of their total reserves.  That means they already consistently sell the difference, and this selling so far has not decimated the dollar.

So do not expect a sudden devaluation of the greenback, nor fear China currency reallocations.

But we can and do expect a gradual weakening of the U.S. dollar to occur next year.

And as much as we all hate it, we will be able to take comfort in the fact that we avoided a much worse evil: Deflation.

So we are going to remain playing it with gold.  Also, this “currency” play gives us added diversification to the portfolio.

Source: Buy, Sell or Hold: The SPDR Gold Trust ETF (NYSE: GLD) Continues to Offer Investors a Hedge Against Inflation

For starters, Intel beat second-quarter earnings estimates by 10 cents a share, as its revenue climbed 12% year-over-year to $8 billion.  Beating earnings estimates is important, but beating on the top line and showing sales growth is even more important in a recession. The reason: It shows that you can do well in spite of a weak economy.

Like most chip stocks, Intel is an economic leading indicator of sorts – a fact that bodes well for the U.S. recovery. Intel said demand actually strengthened as the quarter moved along.  This is the precursor of a much more vigorous third and fourth quarter, which traditionally is when tech companies perform the best.

Adding more fuel to the fire, Intel increased it sales forecast to $9 billion from $8.5 billion and boosted the outlook for its gross margins to the upper end of the 53%-55% range.

One of the big reasons for Intel’s recent progress has been the launch of  Microsoft Corp.’s (Nasdaq: MSFT) Windows 7, which has been well received by many analysts.  Upgrading to Windows 7 from Vista in an existing machine is quite a task. It requires erasing the hard disk and installing the new operating system and all the other software from scratch.

This is different from the traditional incremental upgrades, in which many of the older files remained in place, while the upgrade took care of overwriting and deleting the unnecessary old system files and installing the new ones.  For small companies that have outdated technology, this process is too tedious and it is much more expedient to buy new machines with the new operating system preinstalled.

And there are a lot of old machines with outdated software out there in the business world.  It is not uncommon to see five-year old machines that are not capable of running new resource-intensive applications.  To verify my analysis, I called friends in Fortune 500 companies that manage PCs for their own corporations or for top technology vendors.

The feedback was unanimous in that Vista’s complexity – despite its significant features that were attractive to some specific users – made the operating system an overall disappointment to companies.  The operating system lacked the desired stability and increased maintenance costs.  So the consensus was that corporations would be quick to abandon Vista for Windows 7.

And given the complexity in upgrading existing Vista systems, and the old age of the equipment, it makes sense that many companies would seek to replace entire machines altogether.  So we have the old the “Wintel” symbiosis kicking into high gear.

Also, corporations have cut personnel deeply and need to increase the productivity of their now-overburdened workforce.  Some 70% of employees are not satisfied with their current position, given the additional stress and lack of additional pay.  Therefore, upgrading their technology to make their jobs easier is a high priority.

This won’t be too difficult, because companies’ profits have actually grown 23% in the last two quarters.  With Corporate America now having recapitalized, a new technological wave makes all the sense in the world.

Thus, the argument that the demand pickup is just filling the chain and inventory rebuilding, and that we will be disappointed come January does not seem to hold.  In either case, you will see an outperformance of earnings come the next report, so we should use any downdraft to get into Intel stock.

Also, Intel has regained its technological leadership against Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (NYSE: AMD), despite that fact that AMD is doing well in areas where integrated graphics are important, finally leveraging its acquisition of ATI.

With all cylinders firing, Intel is poised to deliver an upside earnings surprise in the third quarter and blow through estimates in the fourth quarter.  Valuation is cheap compared to the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, considering the rate of growth that Intel is experiencing and expected to deliver both in the short term and well into next year as Windows 7 deployment motivates sales.

The stock is clearly above the 200-day moving average and seems a bit overbought short term.  So do not chase it. But start buying right away, looking to average down over the next 45 days if possible, averaging up until you reach your full position if it keeps running.

Recommendation: Buy Intel Corp. (Nasdaq: INTC) by averaging into the stock over the next 45 days, thus reducing market risk (**).

(**) – Special Note of Disclosure: Horacio Marquez holds no interest in Intel Corp.

Source:  Intel Corp. (Nasdaq: INTC) Is Poised to Top Estimates Over the Next Two Quarters

If NRG Energy Inc. (NYSE: NRG) were an athletic prospect, scouts would rate it as a “triple threat.” That’s because the Princeton-based wholesale power generator is involved in all three of the key energy sources of the future: Solar, wind and nuclear.

And that’s only part of the reason I like this stock.

Growing profit margins and earnings momentum add to the energy company’s appeal – and a rebound in U.S. economic activity hasn’t even begun in full.

When NRG announced its second-quarter results a few weeks ago, the company said that its profits tripled from a year ago – eclipsing Wall Street estimates and setting a new record. It also boosted its earnings guidance for all of 2009, and increased its stock-buyback target from its previous $330 million worth of its shares to $500 million.

Income from continuing operations was $432 million – a marked improvement over last year’s $41 million loss.  And its recent acquisition of the Texas retail-energy business of Reliant Energy Inc. [now RRI Energy Inc. (NYSE: RRI)] is starting to pay off.

In two months the tie-up has already delivered $200 million of the planned $400 million in adjusted earnings before income taxes, depreciation and amortization (essentially a cash-flow metric that professional investors refer to as “EBITDA”) gains for the year.  With disciplined management this acquisition should outperform its estimated gains.  This analysis is being recognized as we speak by the market, with unusual January call option activity in RRI stock last Friday.

NRG has interest in 44 power plants with 24,005 megawatts (MW) net ownership, most of which is in the United States. Plants in Texas and the Northeast account for almost 18,000 MW, giving the company positioning in fairly strong markets where environmental, but NRG also has operations in Australia and Germany.

The company distinguishes itself by having operating margins that are roughly double that of its peers – the product of its efficient fleet composition and prudent active energy price hedging policies. The hedges NRG currently has in place are likely to outperform analysts’ estimates, as well. That’s because no analyst wants to be caught over-estimating upside, especially in volatile markets like energy futures. So, Wall Street consistently undervalues the expected value of these hedges, which the firm carries on a mark-to-market basis. That was the case in the second quarter.

With respect to the economy, industrial sector inventories are very low, meaning they will need to be replenished in the third quarter.  The government’s Car Allowance Rebate System (CARS), popularly known as “Cash for Clunkers,” gave a nice boost to industrial production, and some signs of stability and even some gains – let’s cross our fingers –can be seen in some areas of the housing market.

We’re by no means out of the woods, yet, but U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) did better than expected in the last quarter – shrinking by just 1% – and is likely to beat analysts’ expectations in the third quarter as well. That’s good news for NRG because the third quarter is traditionally the most profitable quarter of the year for utilities. Prices should firm up, benefiting this company’s already stellar return on investment (ROI).

And in addition to being well positioned to profit in the short-term, NRG is an outstanding long-term play because it’s ready to capitalize on the next stage of “green” energy development: low carbon emissions. After all, green is the color of money.

The company’s natural-gas, new and existing commercial nuclear, and new and very large wind-and-solar-power projects are sure to benefit longer term from the move towards environmentally-friendly forms of energy generation.

With total liquidity of $4 billion, NRG is in an impeccable position to develop its planned projects and take advantage of small opportunistic acquisitions, should they appear.  The company has a very prudently managed balance sheet and a shrewd growth management discipline, which is an invaluable attribute in adverse economic conditions where cash is king.

And let’s say that all of these advantages that we have outlined here have not gone unnoticed by the competition:  Two companies in the last three years have attempted to acquire NRG.  Most recently, Exelon Corp. (NYSE: EXC) attempted to buy NRG outright. And even when the takeover attempt was rebuffed, NRG stock did not suffer. Exelon has since backed off from its acquisition attempt.  That stock-price stability reflects strong investor confidence in management’s execution.

At Friday’s closing price of $27.50, NRG’s stock was still down about 30% from its 52-week high of $39.09 – just one of several reasons it still has room to rise, even after a scorching 91% run from its 52-week low of $14.39.

The stock is trading at a low 10 times forward earnings, has been consistently above its 200-day moving average since mid-July and is oversold by many proprietary measures.  This stock could be ripe for a strong upward move as we approach the end of the year.  What’s more important is that the intrinsic long-term value of the company is undervalued at these prices.

Recommendation:  Buy NRG Energy Inc. (NYSE: NRG) at market (**).

(**) – Special Note of Disclosure: Horacio Marquez holds no interest in NRG Energy Inc.

Source:Buy, Sell or Hold: Why NRG Energy Inc. (NYSE: NRG) is the Energy Sector’s “Triple-Threat” Profit Play ]]> http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/buy-sell-or-hold-why-nrg-energy-inc-nyse-nrg-is-the-energy-sector%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9ctriple-threat%e2%80%9d-profit-play/20238/feed 1 http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/buy-sell-or-hold-the-ishares-iboxx-investment-grade-corporate-bond-fund/20113 http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/buy-sell-or-hold-the-ishares-iboxx-investment-grade-corporate-bond-fund/20113#comments Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:02:07 +0000 Horacio Marquez http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20113 The U.S. stock market has enjoyed a strong rally since the early spring, but while the economy has shown improvement, it still faces major headwinds. So it may be best to hedge against the U.S. dollar, which is likely to experience a significant decline over the next few months.

There are a lot of uncertainties permeating the market right now, not the least of which is healthcare reform. Will that reform entail a public option that could add $1 trillion to the deficit?  How is reform going to be financed?  And is it going to mean higher costs for employers across the board, or just the healthcare insurers?

Investing is made infinitely more difficult when 18% of U.S. gross domestic product…

The stock is still a far cry from its record-high level of $83.56, but is only 0% below its 52-week high of $53.46.  Much has changed since then, as the U.S. auto industry is no longer producing the 16 million cars it produced in 2007, nor the 13 million it managed to sell last year.  This year we are looking at some 10 million units sold, according to J.D. Power and Associates, the leading forecaster in the industry.

But there is encouraging news:  The very quick restructuring of both General Motors Corp. (NYSE: GRM) and Chrysler Group LLC, the U.S. Federal Reserve’s efforts to stabilize the financial markets, and the U.S. government’s fiscal stimulus plans have helped keep the economy from falling into a depression.  The Fed’s support for the auto industry included buying auto receivables under the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF) program, in order to restart this type of securitization.

Therefore, the paralysis of sales that we saw late last year, when the financial system froze and there was no financing available, has subsided and sales are increasing.  In fact, J.D. Power expects U.S. vehicle sales to increase to 11.5 million units next year, a full 15% pickup from projected 2009 levels.

In fact, we are already seeing an increase in auto sales already, thanks in no small part to the government’s Car Allowance Rebate System (CARS), popularly known as “Cash for Clunkers.” So far, CARS has spent some $1.29 billion and Congress has expanded the original $1 billion authorization by another $2 billion.

Total light vehicle sales for July were just shy of 1 million units, a milestone the industry hasn’t topped since August 2008, mostly due to the program’s success.

This shot in the arm on the back of the general cost restructuring that Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) is carrying out under Allan Mulally has already prompted Ford to increase production of its Focus model.

Similarly, Chrysler has reported that it is running two plants in overtime and a third shift at another plant just to keep up with demand.  And GM, which is seeing a huge rebound in sales, will add to this by increasing advertising spending and selling new cars on eBay Inc.’s (Nasdaq: EBAY) popular online auction Web site. Most of Wall Street is in “wait-and-see” mode, which gives us more of an incentive to jump in.  But the steel story is not just about cars.

Nucor will not only profit from the remaining $1.75 billion to be deployed through the government’s cash for clunkers program and the general improvement in market conditions, but on the pick-up in government construction in the United States that will result from U.S. President Barack Obama’s massive fiscal stimulus.

Additionally, the company will benefit from the already massive stimuli being deployed in China, Brazil, India and Russia.  And let us not forget Europe, where the European Central Bank will soon consider raising its benchmark lending rate to 1.25% from its current record low of 1% in order to prevent inflationary expectations from building up.

China will achieve more than 8% growth this year, driven by public spending, especially in construction and a strong pickup in auto sales  (up 63.6% in July from a year earlier) and domestic appliances.  All of these have a very high content of steel.

Similarly, India’s gross domestic product (GDP) will grow by more than 6%, barely down from last year’s 6.7% expansion. Auto sales in India jumped 18% last month.  Remember that India’s Tata Motors Ltd. (NYSE ADR: TTM) launched the cheapest car in the world last January and this is likely to work wonders in today’s budget-conscious market.

So what about Nucor itself?

The company reported a second quarter loss of $133 million, which improved over the first quarter’s $189 million loss.  But the key is that volumes are already turning around.

Volumes increased 11% in the second quarter, which allowed the company to increase its capacity utilization from 45% to a still very low 46%.

And this is where the upside lies.

In capital-intensive industries like steel, the very high fixed costs induce very large swings in profits, depending on volumes.  And not only did Nucor see its volumes pick up in the second quarter, the trend should continue accelerating in the third quarter and beyond, thanks to the recent burst in car sales and increased government infrastructure spending.

In addition, prior to the cash for clunkers program, Nucor announced it already expected to see an improvement in its third-quarter results. The company said that many of its customers had run their inventories too low and would need to replenish them just to meet demand.

So, at reporting time, investors could be very positively surprised by Nucor and many other companies in the sector, which will provoke many analysts to increase their stock targets.

And to make the whole story even better, we are counting on increasing inflationary expectations and a weaker dollar, which will continue to drive portfolio managers to hedge this risk in commodity stocks.

That means Nucor, which has been bumping into strong resistance levels since the beginning of January, but making higher lows in every subsequent correction, is likely to break out of its current range with an explosive rally before it even reports third-quarter earnings.

Nucor stock closed down 92 cents, or 1.93%, Friday at $46.79 a share.

Source: Nucor Corporation Will Get Is Due for a Boost from Government Spending

However, the stock has underperformed since the market began its rebound on March 10. And since the end of March, Pepsi’s shares have lagged those of arch rival, The Coca-Cola Co. (NYSE: KO), since the end of March, as well.  I recommended Coca Cola last week after the company reported stellar growth in the emerging markets.

While Pepsi’s less-than-stellar performance is not yet a major concern, the trend is discomforting.  In addition, there has been a major divergence in the strategies of these two companies.

While both Coke and Pepsi divested of their bottling operations many years ago, Pepsi just agreed to buy back two of them: Pepsi Bottling Group Inc. (NYSE: PBG) and PepsiAmericas Inc. (NYSE: PAS). And it paid a stiff premium in each deal, about 24% and 23%, respectively, above their pre-deal market prices. The total value of the deal was a cool $7.8 billion.

Now allow me to say that these companies are impressive operations by themselves:

• Pepsi Bottling Group is PepsiCo’s largest bottler. The company takes in $14 billion a year and operates in the United States, Canada, Greece, Mexico, Russia, Spain and Turkey, and boasts 67,000 employees.

• Pepsi Americas is PepsiCo’s second-largest bottler. It brings in $4.9 billion annually from operations in the United States, Ukraine, Poland, Romania, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia.  In addition, its new joint venture covers the Caribbean and Central America.

So why bother with these acquisitions?

The justification for this move is that “in a rapidly changing, more-complicated global market, a leaner, more agile business model is pretty important,” said Pepsi Bottling Group Chief Executive Officer Eric J. Foss.

Pepsi touted the tie-up itself, citing such advantages as attempting to create a more-flexible, efficient and competitive system that is more inclusive of other Pepsi brands.

The idea is that a merged operation will allow for much faster introduction of new products, for bundled offers, for enhanced customer service, and for cost savings from redundancies and economies of scale.

Sure, we can buy into many of those ideas, which are sure to result in some gains.  In fact, we can even envision the many new marketing initiatives that will result from these acquisitions.

But make no mistake: What has pushed Pepsi to go in this direction is the superiority of Coca Cola in the emerging markets.  While both firms prided themselves on product innovation and marketing, Coca-Cola has come out on top, as I wrote last week.

In addition, the capital requirements of a bottling and distribution operation are very high and the return on equity is much lower than Coca-Cola’s core business of creating the product, marketing it, and selling the concentrate and bottling rights to bottlers.  This decision will make less cash available in the immediate future for stock buybacks and dividend increases and represents a big gamble.

There are two pressing questions to have in mind:

• Will the marketing synergies PepsiCo claims it will garner from the deals be successful in winning market share away from its rival and thus justify the added capital requirements of the newly acquired operations?
• And will Pepsi be able to capture the synergies from the merger fast enough?

What’s for sure is that Pepsi’s action goes against its decision to concentrate on its core competencies. Management theory has proven time and again that companies should concentrate in one segment of the entire value chain (in Coca Coal’s case, product innovation and marketing) and leave the less-attractive and less-profitable areas to others.

Furthermore, it’s clear to me that “asset-light” companies – firms such as C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. (NYSE: CHRW), which divested assets that have large financing requirements and that carry large fixed costs – reduce the cyclicality of the business, and thus reduce the risks to profits from economic downturns.  That means “asset-light” companies are preferable to “asset-heavy” companies.

Therefore, my bias is against the added complexity and capital requirements involved with the Pepsi deal.  And we must now wait to see if the company can deliver on the two key questions above.  But we can never count out Pepsi’s innovation and resiliency, and so we will give them the benefit of the doubt.

PepsiCo stock closed down 9 cents, or 0.16%, at $57.74 a share Friday. That’s up 32% from its hit 52-week low of $43.78, reached in Early March.

Recommendation: “Hold” PepsiCo Inc. (NYSE: PEP), but do not add to your position, and give preference to Coca Cola’s stock – at least until Pepsi is able to prove that it can execute the merger efficiencies and win market share from its arch-rival (**).

** Special Note of Disclosure: Horacio Marquez holds no interest in PepsiCo Inc.

Source: Buy, Sell or Hold: Will PepsiCo Inc.’s (NYSE: PEP) Recent Acquisitions Pay Off?

Coca-Cola beat earnings, increased guidance, increased dividends and reinstated its stock buyback program.  The company plans to repurchase $1 billion in shares of stock in the second half of 2009.  What more do we need?  The answer is: Consistent performance.

As I tracked the developments in Coca Cola and their global markets, I ascertained that my original view remains unchanged and Coca Cola should keep growing profits consistently, which should keep propelling its stock up.

Remember, on March 9, a few of weeks after our Coca Cola recommendation, I called the U.S. market turn by recommending a pro-cyclical energy play with Diamond Offshore Drilling Co. (NYSE: DO).  That call coincided with the turn on Diamond Offshore stock as well, which has since soared about 67%.

Earlier, on October 27, I had called for the turn on iShares MSCI Brazil Index (NYSE: EWZ), which has since soared more than 90%.

The point is that emerging markets, as was my thesis, are going to turn around much faster and come back much stronger than developed economies.

Prudent emerging economies – like Brazil and Chile – having enjoyed a few years of exponential growth in commodity prices did not over-extended themselves. Instead, they captured a sizable portion of those huge price increases and turned them into huge national savings, improving their fiscal positions.  They kept their banks clean and disciplined and became net creditors to the world.

So, while the advanced economies are saddled with debt, many emerging economies are the exact opposite.  Their fiscal positions are strong; their social security systems are not in peril, and their population growth means strong economic growth.

So, my initial thesis was predicated primarily on the fact that strong growth in emerging markets would lead to success for major international players.

While it’s true that Coca-Cola’s soft drinks are consumer staples, which are very resilient in economic downturns, the company’s biggest advantage is that a full 75% of its income is generated abroad.

Additionally, Coca-Cola is the most widely recognized brand name in the world.  With a distribution network that covers more than 200 countries and a 50% of the global market for carbonated drinks, Coca-Cola is the poster-child of a multinational.

What’s more, having kept its rival PepsiCo Inc. (NYSE: PEP) at bay by beating them in the market, their price wars are not an issue any more.  This is crucial because pricing power has returned.

The strong U.S. dollar shaved 14% off of operating income during the quarter, but this is a temporary phenomenon, since the dollar is likely to remain week in the months to come.

Meanwhile, Coca-Cola continues to excel in emerging markets, just as we anticipated.  While overall volume growth was 4%, up from 2% in the first quarter, emerging markets took the prize: China was up 14%, India 33% and Brazil up 5%.

India, for example, has a high birth rate and 1 billion people with an average age of 25 years, and going lower.  This is a very receptive crowd for carbonated, sugary drinks, especially as their income soars.

Hence, with the strong recovery in China, India, Brazil and Russia, and many more emerging markets, plus the renewed weakness in the U.S. dollar, Coca-Cola should continue to perform in the second half and beyond.

Coca-Cola stock closed Friday up 17 cents, or 0.34%, at $49.84 a share.

Recommendation: Buy The Coca-Cola Co. (NYSE: KO) at market(**).

(**)  Special Note of Disclosure: Horacio Marquez holds no interest inThe Coca-Cola Co. (NYSE: KO).

Source: Buy, Sell or Hold: The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE: KO) Continues to Deliver Knockout Profits