“I don’t know if I will live to see it,” said Brazil’s president Luiz (Lula) da Silva a couple weeks ago. “But Brazil has to transform itself into a big power in the 21st century. We have everything to make it happen. We are not talking about a little country here.”

No, indeed. Brazil is not “a little country” anymore. Any prudent investor has to consider how to hitch a ride on the Brazil growth story. Brazil is transforming into one of the world’s great powers in this century. It’s important to follow the news from Brazil. At the same time, you have to know where to look, and how to read between the lines.

By official count — what the Brazilian government will confirm — the rocks of Brazil hold nearly 20 billion barrels of proven reserves. That number is on par with the total for U.S. oil reserves, including Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico.

It’s an impressive number, but then there’s also the unofficial Brazilian reserve count. How much oil is “really” down there under Brazilian jurisdiction? It depends with whom you talk. Some Brazilian officials will smile and say the country has 50 billion barrels of resources. If the Brazilians can tap into this treasure, it adds up to more than twice the total reserves of the U.S., including Alaska.

Other knowledgeable — VERY knowledgeable — Brazilians give much larger estimates. I’ve seen estimates that place the resource number at “over 100 billion barrels.” This puts Brazil in with the largest of the large oil nations, such as Iraq, Iran and Saudi Arabia.

These massive oil resources offshore Brazil lie beneath deep water and thick layers of salt. And since it’s all within Brazilian waters, the government of Brazil is increasing its control over offshore development. This way, Brazil will have its own oilmen keeping an eye out for the overall national interest — and making big money for the Brazilian treasury.

The new level of Brazil’s state control over oil development is a strategic decision. Brazil is counting on the hydrocarbon resources to help propel it forward as one of the world’s major powers. And the development in Brazil will control the destiny of a good number of players in the OI portfolio.

Many companies whose fate is tied to the wheel of the Brazilian ship of state are in that portfolio. All of them have operations that span the globe. They’re not a pure play on Brazilian energy development. Just the same, it’s nice to know that they’ll be pulling down a big chunk of business in one booming region over the next couple of decades. As I see it, these firms are long-term core holdings for any diversified energy portfolio.

Gold on the Move

This week, the price of gold touched $1,040 per ounce. Silver also took the elevator to higher floors, to now over $17 per ounce. It’s been good news for all of the gold and silver miners in the OI portfolio.

We’re way up on many of the miners I’ve added this year to the OI portfolio. Some of the beaten-down guys are also showing us their inner Lazarus as precious metals prices soar.

What’s with the Rising Tide?

I just love it when the stocks in the OI portfolio are going up. It beats the heck out of what we experienced last October with the meltdown, that’s for sure. And it makes it easier to be the editor of a financial newsletter that focuses on precious metals, energy and other natural resources.

What’s going on? What’s with the rising tide? I believe we’re seeing some short covering in the precious metals arena. It has always amazed me in the past couple of years that there were people out there shorting gold. Huh? It’s like that scene from the movie The Deer Hunter in which Robert De Niro is playing Russian roulette with a pistol holding bullets in the chambers. You don’t have to be crazy to short gold, but it helps.

I may not have the same eyesight today as back when I flew Navy jets. But how close do you have to look to see that the U.S. dollar is in trouble? Yet people still want to bet on the dollar and against gold? Hey, it’s a free country. And I’ve spent the past few years feeling pretty lonely at times as I described my vision of monetary gloom and doom.

So now the dollar is dropping due to bad news on many fronts. The U.S. economy is NOT “recovering,” contrary to the propaganda from Washington. Unemployment is up, and it’ll stay up for a long time. There’s a structural readjustment going on within the U.S. economy, and it’ll take years (maybe decades) to play out. Meanwhile, U.S. tax policy, energy policy and the overall political process are a train wreck in living color. Can anyone explain to me how this has a happy ending?

The world, of course, is noticing. Now we read about a group of nations (the usual suspects, but add in modern allies Japan and France) trying to figure out how to ditch the dollar and use some other medium of exchange to trade oil. It’s not exactly a new rumor, but now it’s getting traction. And like people smelling smoke in a crowded theater, dollar holders are looking for the exit signs.

Is anyone surprised at this? How much fiscal and monetary abuse can the greenback stand? Hence, the precious metals prices are levitating.

We’ll probably see a pullback in precious metals prices, but that’s just going to be profit taking and the market working its magic. Long term, the metals are still going up.

It’s part of the long-term thesis of Outstanding Investments. Go with precious metals. Go with energy plays. Go with solid resource plays.

Until we meet again,
Byron King

Source: Energy, Brazil, Gold: What More Could You Want?

“The issue is a disputed border between the two. They fought a 32-day war over it in 1962. China emerged victorious, but the whole thing settled nothing. The border between the two remains hotly contested. It is nearly 2,500 miles long and winds its way across difficult mountainous terrain. There is a northeastern state in India called Arunachal Pradesh, which China calls “Southern Tibet” and claims as Chinese territory.

“India claims last year there were nearly 300 border violations by Chinese troops and over 2,000 instances of ‘aggressive border patrolling.’ In the Indian media, it’s become a kind of sport to guess when China will attack India. And a recent essay by a Chinese analyst added fuel to the fire when it claimed China could ‘dismember the so-called “Indian Union” with one little move.’

“What would the effects be? It’s hard to say. But if the world’s two largest and fastest- growing emerging markets go to war, the results can’t be good for the global economy. China is even India’s largest trading partner. It all depends on how it unfolds.”

Chris will be getting a frontlines view of this flash point over the next few weeks. He and our executive publisher Addison Wiggin will be scouting potential joint ventures in the UAE and India from this weekend until mid-October. For highlights, be sure to check your daily 5 Min. Forecast. But for the nitty-gritty — and actionable advice — keep your eyes open for our new BRIC report… it’ll be ready very soon.

Source: Think China vs. India

China has used depressed commodities prices to stock up on long-term supplies of raw materials such as oil, copper, and iron.  And it’s used structural weakness in the U.S. financial system as justification for replacing the dollar as the world’s main reserve currency.

Now, the Red Dragon is looking to make headway on the highway by winning global market share in the automotive market while U.S. heavyweights spin out.

“We aren’t afraid of the financial crisis,” Zhou Fuquan, vice president of Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd. (PINK: GELYF), told Bloomberg News. “On the contrary, we hope it will penetrate even further as it has provided us with some opportunities.”

Geely is China’s biggest private automaker, but that isn’t exactly saying much. The company’s annual output is just 300,000 units, and its market share in China is a meager 3%. Still, Hangzhou- based Geely is determined to become a global player in the auto industry. It has ambitions to sell 2 million cars a year, including 1.3 million overseas – even though right now the company generates just 5% of its sales from abroad.

Of course, that’s why the financial crisis has been more of a financial opportunity for Geely. In March, Geely bought key assets from bankrupt Australian gearbox maker Drivetrain Systems International – the world’s second-largest maker of automatic transmissions.

“The economic downturn provides us with very good overseas acquisition opportunities,” Daniel Dai, vice president for international business at Geely, told China Daily. “We get the best technology with the best price.”

Geely has also set up a joint venture with Manganese Bronze Holdings PLC (MBH) to produce the TX4 London Taxi in Shanghai. MBH supplies taxis to Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Spain as well, boosting Geely’s global presence.

For months, analysts have speculated that Geely will continue to its overseas expansion by launching a bid for Ford Motor Co.’s (NYSE: F) Volvo unit. Ford, which is the only “Big Three” auto company to not receive government aid, last December started looking to offload the Swedish car brand in an effort to pay off the debt it accrued when the company borrowed $23.5 billion in 2006.

Geely said on Sept. 9 that it might partner with a state-owned investment company to bid for Volvo. And earlier this week, the company announced that it would raise $334 million in funds from Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS) through a convertible bond offering to “fund the capital expenditures of the group, potential acquisitions by the group and for general corporate purposes of the group.”

However, some analysts have pointed out that the Goldman capital falls well short of the roughly $2 billion Ford is asking for Volvo. They believe Geely instead will use the money to increase capacity and market the models it already has to buyers outside of its home market.

“The management is planning to expand its distribution channel to foreign countries,” Richard Li, research director at Celestial Asia Securities Holdings, told Forbes magazine. “This deal can provide this company enough funds so that the cash flow will be upgraded long term.”

And if nothing else, Goldman’s investment could be enough to instill investor confidence in the small Chinese carmaker.

Almost a year ago to the day Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE: BRK.A, BRK.B) subsidiary MidAmerican Energy Holdings Co. agreed to pay roughly $230 million for a 9.89% stake in Chinese car and battery producer BYD Co. Ltd. Since then, BYD’s shares have jumped more than fivefold in that time.

“A big name investor certainly helps boost stock prices and brand recognition,” Li Lixi, a Northeast Securities Co. analyst in Shanghai, told Bloomberg. “Goldman’s investment in Geely may repeat the impact that [Warren] Buffett had on BYD.”

Geely’s Hong Kong shares yesterday (Wednesday) surged to their highest in more than nine years on the news of Goldman’s investment.

The Race to Build a Competitive Chinese Brand

Geely isn’t the only Chinese companies looking to use the financial crisis as an opportunity to broaden its global reach either. Other Chinese companies, including Beijing Automotive Industry Holdings Co. (BAIC), SAIC Motor Corp. Ltd., and Sichuan Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery Co., are determined take the lead in what has become a race to be the first world-renowned Chinese automotive company.

“It takes decades to establish a recognized, renowned brand,” Jim Hossack, an industry analyst at researcher AutoPacific Inc., told Bloomberg. “China wants to do it much faster, perhaps within as little as five years.”

BAIC on Sept. 9 joined Koenigsegg Group in its bid for GM’s Saab division. Koenigsegg – backed by U.S. and Norwegian investors – in June agreed to buy Saab from GM, but struggled with financing the deal.

SAIC group, the parent of China’s largest automaker, had also considered coming to Koenigsegg’s aid in the Saab bid. But ultimately it was BAIC that came through with the $420 billion in financing needed to close the deal.

“This is a great opportunity for us to partner up with a brand like Saab that we believe has a great future with a new business plan and new ownership,” Wang Dazong, general manager of Beijing Auto, said in a statement posted on its Web site.

Koenigsegg and BAIC will form a joint venture to market Saab cars in China, where the brand has little-to-no presence. BAIC will also gain valuable technology from the Swedish car company.

“Chinese manufacturers are hoping to buy up technology that will help them catch up to world standards on both the product and the development side more quickly than they would on their own,” Christoph Stuermer, automotive analyst at IHS Global Insight Inc., told the Financial Times.

However, not every Chinese endeavor has been greeted with success. Shanghai-based SAIC in 2004 paid $500 million for 49% of Ssangyong Motor Co. just to watch the South Korean carmaker go into receivership in February. And Sichuan Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery’s attempted takeover of GM’s Hummer brand is still being stalled by China’s central government.

“It’s not in coordination with our nation’s industrial policy,” Vice Minister of Commerce Chen Jian said after sending back Sichuan’s application to acquire the Hummer brand for $100 million.

Still, Chinese auto companies won’t be satisfied until they race ahead of their Western counterparts.

“I’m fighting for what’s in overseas automakers’ rice bowls,” Geely founder Li Shufu told Bloomberg. “I want to build Geely into a global first-tier automaker.”

Source: Financial Crisis Gives Chinese Car Companies a Chance to Get Up to Speed

Brazil had clearly become the new “must-play” market for investors.

And then they had to go and spoil it all.

As promising a market as Brazil had become, it was the discovery of the massive Tupi oil field off of the country’s east coast – that really transformed Brazil into an investor’s dream. The oil and natural-gas reserves are located beneath heavy salt beds in deep offshore water. These reserves are 23,000 feet to 26,000 feet down, a depth that wasn’t even accessible until recently.

These Tupi reserves appear to contain at least 60 billion barrels of oil, worth $4 trillion at today’s prices. Tupi oil is expected to start hitting the market in 2011 or 2012. When that happens, it will revolutionize Brazil’s economy and its shift its balance of payments.

The exploration of the Tupi oil fields had been carried out by the Brazilian oil company Petroleo Brasileiro SA (NYSE ADR: PBR) – more commonly referred to as Petrobras – in partnership with some of the international majors. The contracts call for the Brazilian government to receive royalties on any oil found.

Brazil is now one of only three top oil-producing countries to not assert state ownership of its oil reserves. Canada and the United States are the others.

This was very reassuring for the international oil majors. They’re used to dealing with fruitcake kleptocratic regimes in Venezuela, Angola, Nigeria and most of the Middle East. As a result, the Tupi deposits generated real excitement both among oil companies and among international investors in general. The feeling was that Brazil was about to end its two centuries of failed economic hopes. Fueled by oil revenue and additional economic activity, Brazil appeared ready to claim its true destiny as a wealthy country.

Unfortunately, it wasn’t to be.

Although there are several reasons for this, a key culprit is the election scheduled for next year. Incumbent Brazilian President Luis Inacio “Lula” da Silva can’t run again. But he’d very much like to choose his successor. The most likely candidate: current Chief of Staff Dilma Rousseff.

Rousseff was put in charge of devising a scheme to capture more of the Tupi oil revenues for the Brazilian government and, nominally, the Brazilian people. Tales were spun of how the new revenue would finally eliminate Brazilian inequality, and bring its poorest citizens up to Western living standards.

The new system announced this month reflects this aspiration. A new state oil company, Petrosal, would be created to manage the reserves. Petrobras – aided by outside investor capital – would carry out production. And Petrosal and the outside investors would share the output.

This plan will imbue Petrosal with a lot of power. The company would control half the votes on the operating consortium. And it would have veto rights over production and capital expenditures.

The revenue would be managed by a new state fund. The fund would devote this new cash to poverty relief, education and infrastructure.

In the meantime, the existing royalty system would remain in place. Under this system, outside investors would pay both royalties and a production share. In one acknowledgement of marketplace realities, concessions already granted would not be torn up.

There are two major problems with this system. First, it makes life much more difficult and less profitable for oil companies wanting to invest in the Tupi oil field. Had Brazil torn up existing contracts, I believe the oil majors would have left. In the past two years, the world’s Big Oil firms already saw existing agreements torn up in Nigeria and Venezuela. There’s just no point investing large amounts of money under such risky conditions.

As it is, the new Brazil agreement applies only to new contracts. So I believe the oil companies will probably put up with this new system – at least as long as oil prices remain high. It’s not as if these firms have a lot of alternatives right now.

However, given how expensive it will be to extract this oil, if market prices drop, it may end up being difficult to attract Big Oil players.

The more dangerous problem is this fund, which is little more than a huge pool of money that politicians can play with.

As I mentioned, Brazil’s economy has been one of the world’s best performers. This year, in the face of a worldwide recession, Brazil’s gross domestic product (GDP) is expected to decline only 1%, according to the forecasting panel of The Economist magazine.

Inflation is 5% and the budget deficit is only 2.8% of GDP – both excellent figures in this difficult year. Brazil’s monetary policy is an example to the world, with short-term interest rates still at 8.65%, well above the inflation rate.

But this money pool plan puts that performance at risk.

Brazilian public spending is already 35% of GDP, very high for such a poor country. State bureaucrats have feather-bedded contracts guaranteed to them under the 1988 constitution. So this “slush fund” will just fuel Brazilian corruption, diverting still more of that country’s economy into the pockets of politicians, their friends and favoured interest groups.

It’s no use for Brazilian spin-doctors to point out that Norway and Alaska have funds of this nature. Norway and Alaska have small populations and relatively un-corrupt political cultures. This fund must inevitably represent at least 3%-5% of Brazilian GDP. And it will be mostly wasted, spent without the market having any say as to its use or destination.

I’ve been watching Brazil for more than 30 years; since I began travelling there for the merchant bank Hill Samuel [now part of Lloyd's Banking Group PLC (NYSE ADR: LYG)] in the late 1970s. It’s a maddening country: Just when you think the Brazilian authorities have finally got their act together, and that the country is ready to achieve the enormous economic growth predicted for it since at least 1900, something unexpected and foolish goes wrong.

This appears to have happened again. And that’s a real pity – for Brazil’s citizens, and for global investors.

Source: The World’s Most Exciting Market – Until They Spoiled it

• Reliable sources of energy.
• A modern, efficient infrastructure, consisting of a good road and rail system, reliable power grids and high-speed digital communications networks.

And if a country wants to be considered a “global economic powerhouse,” it’s nearly impossible for it to do so without these critical building blocks.

So it’s not too surprising that China is spending unprecedented amounts of money to beef up its infrastructure.

It’s also spending huge amounts of money on long-term oil and gas contracts. And with nearly $2 trillion on hand, it’s the perfect time for China to go on an energy acquisition spree.

Right now, it’s spending like a thirsty sailor on shore leave…

You see, despite the recent pullback in the Chinese stock market, the country is still on an economic roll that will continue for the next 50 years. According to The Economist, China’s capital spending is a whopping 44% of its GDP, and in raw dollars could exceed that of the United States for the first time this year.

And you can bet that its increase in energy use will track right along with its growth.

But China’s energy problems are similar to those of the United States: It doesn’t have enough of its own sources of fossil fuel to meet its needs.

So what is China doing to combat this? And is there a way to tap into this in terms of investing? Answers below…

China’s Energy Asset Acquisition Spree

At the moment, China is importing coal, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and crude oil. And to guarantee that those supplies are uninterrupted, it’s buying some major deposits of oil and gas, along with the refineries to process it.

We’re not just talking small potatoes, either. Since Christmas, China has been on an overseas energy asset acquisition spree. The country has spent a total of $17 billion, easily topping the $13.1 billion it spent in all of 2008. What’s more, the pace of acquisitions doesn’t appear to be slowing – and could even ramp up into 2010.

Many companies are teaming up, putting together joint deals that insure even the largest purchases have funding behind them. And some are very, very big. For example…

• In April, PetroChina (NYSE: PTR) partnered with KazMunaiGaz and plunked down a cool $5 billion to purchase JSC MangistauMunaiGas from Central Asia Petroleum. This was one of the first instances of Chinese firms partnering together to purchase a foreign oil company.
• June saw a highly publicized $20 billion deal, in which China National Petroleum Corporation joined forces with BP (NYSE: BP) to buy a 75% stake in the Rumaila oil field in southern Iraq. The consortium’s bid topped that of the Exxon/Mobil (NYSE: XOM)/Shell (NYSE: RDS) partnership.
• Just one month later, the China National Offshore Oil Company (NYSE: CEO) – often referred to as CNOOC – hooked up with Sinopec. The two of them coughed up $1.3 billion to acquire a 20% stake in a deepwater block off Angola from Marathon Oil.

China’s Knee-Deep In Canadian Oil Sands

Now, the Chinese have landed in Canada. And it’s not because they like hockey. They’ve quietly bought up several parts of different oil sands operations.

Just a few days ago, PetroChina announced a $1.7 billion deal, in which it will acquire a 60% stake in Athabasca Oil Sands Corp’s MacKay River and Dover oil sands fields.

This isn’t the first time that China has invested in Canadian oil sands. Back in 2005, CNOOC purchased a 16.7% stake in MEG Energy Corporation, while China Petrochemical Corporation plunked down $83 million for a stake in Syneco Energy, Inc.

So why is China interested in something like oil sands – oil that is very difficult and expensive to bring to fruition? Simple. All the easy, lucrative projects have already gone. It’s a disturbing indication of China’s quiet determination to increase its oil and gas reserves… at any price.

So what’s next?

How To Invest In China’s Energy Acquisition Express

As evidenced by the variety of different operations that China has acquired recently, the country is taking a shotgun approach to energy.

And while it’s not easy to see what it’s focused on next, the best way to play this trend is by owning shares of the buyer. This includes big Chinese oil companies like…

• PetroChina
• Sinopec (NYSE:SHI)
• CNOOC

All these firms have American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), which means you can trade them on the U.S. exchanges.

One note of caution before you do, however: If you read my colleague Louis Basenese’s piece on the China sell off earlier this week, he highlighted 10 reasons why the Chinese market is set to fall from here.

I agree with Lou – and I believe waiting until we see evidence that the Chinese markets have bottomed will represent an excellent time to take a position in some of these companies.

Good investing,

David Fessler

Source: China’s Energy Acquisition: Three Ways to Invest in China

Guaranty Bank in Texas became the 81st U.S. bank to fail this year. It was the 11th largest bank failure in U.S. history. This kind of thing is becoming so regular it is hardly news when it happens.

But what’s interesting to point out about this one is that the FDIC sold Guaranty to Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria of Spain. This is the first time regulators have sold a failed bank to a foreign lender. Such a turn of events would have been unthinkable only a decade ago.

So the world turns. When it comes to the question of who has the money, it’s often a non-U.S. buyer these days.

Speaking of foreign buyers, there is probably no group of buyers more watched and coveted than Chinese consumers. Recently, the Financial Times had a piece that highlights things the Chinese like to buy.

This is important because the Chinese are becoming increasingly affluent in large numbers. Total consumer spending was $1.7 trillion in 2007, compared to $12 trillion in the U.S. But that number is growing rapidly. The FT focused on the new rich. China now boasts more millionaires than the U.K. The rapid growth of this group has companies all over the world spending more money and time figuring out ways to get in their pockets.

So what do the affluent Chinese like? Outside of ordinary things like flashy cars and booze and quirky things like ivory and dried seahorses, one thing was mentioned in the FT piece that caught my eye: The Chinese love gold.

“China loves gold in all its forms,” the FT reports, “as a reserve currency, jewelry, an investment.” I’ve mentioned in the past about how the Chinese central bank doubled its holdings of gold this year, but it’s more widespread than that.

The rising middle class in China also buys a lot of gold. Since 2007, Chinese consumers have been the second largest purchasers of gold jewelry in the world, behind only India. The FT points out those gold sales were up 28% year over year in May. Total gold demand for the year was up 21%, to 400 million tonnes. There are not too many sales of any kind going up that much in this financial crisis, but there it is.

The financial crisis and weak stock market have helped gold as people look for a place to park some money. I think gold will remain a good place to be for some time yet. And gold stocks have the stars lined up for them. Many are reporting falling cash costs, yet the price of gold is staying up here in the $900s — and is likely headed much higher. That means gold stocks are reporting good increases in cash flow, among the few sectors to do so.

The Growth Is Overseas

As to the larger picture, I think trends in overseas markets should continue to be a focus, and I will keep on an eye on them. The U.S consumer is pretty well tapped out, finally. The growth is overseas.

Over the weekend, Barron’s featured a worthwhile interview with Chris Wood, the Hong Kong-based strategist for CLSA’s Asia-Pacific group. He’s been on top of some of the bigger-picture developments in Asia for years — sniffing out trouble in Thailand before the Asian crisis in 1997, for instance, and, more recently, giving early warning calls on the global troubles that would emerge after the U.S. mortgage market imploded.

What’s Wood’s take today? “The financial crisis in the Western world will lead to a long period of anemic growth,” he says. “From a global investor’s standpoint, Asia and the emerging markets stand out as a place to invest.”

When you look at some of the data rolling in, it is hard not to see it. For instance, earlier this year, oil consumption in the developing countries passed the top 30 (OECD) countries for the first time. There are now more cars sold on a monthly basis in the top 16 emerging markets than there are in the U.S., Japan and the EU combined.

More opportunities will emerge, as many of these markets are only in the early innings of the most commodity-intensive part of their development. As a result, we’ll see a lot more power plants, water treatment plants and the like built over time. Then there are the agricultural needs, not only to support population growth, but to support the boost in biofuels.

Biofuel Boom

Steven Johnston at AgCapita, a firm dedicated to investing in agriculture, put together a worthwhile newsletter. In the latest update, the group shows how biofuel production is on the rise:

This trend will surely continue, as most of the oil-producing countries have in place biofuel targets whereby they mandate that a certain amount of fuel must be biofuel. AgCapita’s own research indicated that the biofuel targets in the U.S., the EU, Canada, Japan, Brazil, India and China alone could require the use of over 400 million acres of arable land, or over 10% of the world’s total. This is in direct competition with food production and should have a significant effect on crop prices.

What a lot of people overlook is just how fertilizer-, water- and energy-intensive these biofuels are. So agriculture remains another attractive market to invest in right now in what otherwise looks like a time of tepid growth. That means opportunities in fertilizer stocks, grain handlers, farm equipment and farmland.

Have a good week, and I’ll write you again soon.

Regards,
Chris Mayer

Source: What Chinese Money Buys: Gold Goes Green

Now, Chavez’s aggressive economic policies are again being called into question, this time as the country slides into what could be a protracted period of stagflation, which is defined by the exasperating mixture of torpid economic growth and high inflation.

Before that, however, the period from 2004-2007 was marked by rapid economic growth – punctuated by a miraculous 19.42% burst in 2004. Since that time, unfortunately, Venezuelans have watched as their standard of living was slowly eroded by restrictive price controls, rapid inflation, unsustainable public spending, and widespread nationalizations that have put a stranglehold on industry.

Even as these problems festered, an unprecedented surge in oil prices allowed Chavez to maintain his questionable – and ultimately unsustainable – economic policies. When the bull market in commodities abruptly stalled last year, Venezuela’s economy lumbered to a stop.

Venezuela’s economy grew by 3.2% in the fourth quarter of 2008 and just 0.3% in the first quarter of 2009. Then – for the first time in more than five years – that country’s economy contracted, shrinking 2.4% in the second quarter.

Unfortunately for Venezuela, the decline in gross domestic product (GDP) did little to quell surging inflation.  The annual rate of inflation climbed to 26.2% in July, according to the Central Bank of Venezuela. Many foreign sources have it higher.

President Chavez insists his country is not in the midst of a financial crisis, but analysts believe this is just the beginning of a bad-news saga that will trip up a country whose heavy-handed economic policies have made it few friends.

“To sum up, we could say that such scenario of stagflation has two basic components,” Orlando Ochoa, an economist and professor with Andrés Bello Catholic University (UCAB), told El Universal. “On the one hand, price control, exchange control, nationalizations and restricted distribution of foreign currency damage supply. On the other hand, lower oil prices curtail revenues and have an impact on demand.”

Going forward, Venezuela’s currency controls are perhaps the biggest hurdle for the economy to overcome. Chavez and his cabinet have said they are preparing to announce measures to stimulate the economy, but that may not be enough.

The problems that come with over-reliance on oil and a vast net of unwieldy social programs and the cost burden of nationalized industry aren’t going anywhere. And the nation’s other obstacle – the gap between its official and parallel exchange rates – won’t be addressed until at least the end of September.

An Unparalleled Problem

Indeed, the problems facing Venezuela are many. But President Chavez and his cabinet believe they have the solution.

“There is a remedy,” Venezuelan Finance Minister Ali Rodriguez said in an interview broadcast on state television. “The differential between the official dollar and the [so-called] ‘parallel dollar’ can be reduced.”

Rodriguez was referring to the difference between the country’s “official” exchange rate – which remains at 2.15 bolivars per U.S. dollar – and the so-called “parallel market,” which suggests a rate of about 6.5 bolivars per U.S. dollar.

The official exchange rate of 2.15 bolivars per U.S. dollar was arrived at in 2003, when Chavez imposed currency controls that force Venezuelans who want to import goods to apply for a government permit. Importers that are unable to get permits to buy currency at the official exchange rate have been forced to turn to the parallel market, where they pay three times the official price.

The problem now is that a large drop in oil revenue has sharply reduced the amount of dollars the government has available to exchange. That has driven more importers to the pricier parallel market. Some have stopped importing entirely.

With limited access to imports, Venezuela’s manufacturing sector contracted by 8.5% in the second quarter.

“The manufacturing sector is going to have a negative performance, mostly because of the restriction in imports and dollars, which has caused a drop in the supply of primary materials,” Miguel Carpio, an economist at Banco Federal CA in Caracas, told Bloomberg News. “Add to that the drop in consumption, and this is going to be a very difficult year.”

Now, with the threat of stagflation looming large, Chavez has no choice but to take action. But economists are unsure of what the government will do.

Few analysts expect the government to order an outright devaluation, because it would push inflation beyond the 28% annual rate. (Venezuela last devalued the official rate in 2005, weakening the currency by 11%.)

Instead, the government could try to lower the parallel rate by issuing dollar-denominated debt, by creating a second, separate exchange rate for “necessary” industries, or by doing both those things.

Traditionally, the government chooses to subsidize certain favorite industries – mainly heavy machinery, foodstuffs and medicines – by allowing them to trade bolivars at the official rate and driving other non-essential goods producers to the parallel market.

This could be taken a step further by imposing a tax on lower priority industries seeking dollars at the official exchange rate, Russ Dallen, head trader at Caracas Capital Markets, said in a research note. Or the government could simply create multiple “official” rates for different industries. Venezuela may create four different exchange rates to help the government deal with a drop in oil revenue.

“This complicated system, if implemented, would satisfy the requirements of the government of pretending not to have a formal devaluation of the exchange rate,” Dallen said.

Credit Suisse Group AG (NYSE ADR: CS) said in an Aug. 28 report that it expects the government to avoid devaluating its currency by selling dollar-denominated debt to the parallel market. In 2008, after an aggressive sale of dollar-denominated bonds, the administration was able to bring down the parallel rate to around 3 bolivars.

Ultimately, it’s Chavez – who opened the door to speculation in August by saying he would “restore balance” to the parallel rate – who will decide what to do about his country’s quandary. But he won’t be making a decision until later this month.

“Is there going to be an adjustment? I can’t respond to that right now,” Chavez said Sunday at the presidential palace in Caracas. “If any adjustment comes, it will be in September, towards the end of the month.”

But whatever Chavez decides to do, his remedy is likely to fall short, analysts say. That’s because the parallel rate is not the problem – it’s actually a symptom of flawed economic principles. The restrictive price-and-exchange-rate controls, government expansion, and political obtuseness that Chavez has made the cornerstones of his economic policy will continue to conspire against Venezuela until there is reform.

“We always said the situation was only tenable for the government if oil prices not only remained high, but also rose constantly. But that has not happened, and the fall in oil income is now clearly in evidence,” UCAB’s Ochoa told Inter Press Service News Agency. “That’s the first factor contributing to stagflation, to which are added price and exchange controls and restrictions on hard currency availability, which harm supply and investment, and thirdly, the policy of nationalization.”

Venezuela’s Crude Oil Slick

In the years leading up to the financial crisis, Chavez used PDVSA’s growing revenue to finance large social programs, as well as the nationalization of other industries.

Spending on social programs soared 340% from 2000-2005, according to the Center for Economic and Policy Research. It rose even higher as oil prices soared into 2008, boosting purchase orders and fueling a spending spree among even the poorest Venezuelans.

But since the financial crisis eviscerated commodities prices, Venezuela’s oil bounty has all but evaporated. Oil brought in $22.8 billion in the first six months of 2009. That’s less than half of the $52 billion it brought in during the first half of last year. For 2008 as a whole, oil generated about $90 billion in revenue for Venezuela.

Meanwhile, FONDEN – Venezuela’s development fund – has already committed all but $3 billion of the nearly $20 billion it had available at the end of January, as the government used most of the money in the first half of the year to sustain fiscal spending.

And while Venezuelan oil traded at an average of $53 a barrel in the second quarter, up from $40 a barrel in the first three months of 2009, that’s still a far cry from last year’s levels.

That means borrowing has had to rise to compensate for the decline in revenue.  Venezuela’s domestic debt jumped 44% during the first half of the year to $20.42 billion from $14 billion at the end of 2008.

“Public spending keeps rising and is financed by more public debt, which increases spending in a vicious circle, while the government defers or postpones workers’ demands, which is itself another sign of the approaching recession, although the government seeks to deny it,” economist Domingo Maza Zavala, a former head of the Central Bank told the IPS.

Calculations based on official figures suggest domestic and foreign debt repayments will total about $19.6 billion between the second half of this year and 2011, the Latin American Herald Tribune reported. Roughly $10 billion of that total will be due on foreign debt, with the remaining $9.6 billion destined for the domestic account. Total state debt is estimated at $50.3 billion.

What’s the government figures don’t include is the cost of compensating private companies that have been taken over or bought out under Chavez’s nationalizations and expropriations.

Chavez’s government earlier this year seized the assets of more than 70 foreign and domestic oil service companies after conflict erupted over nearly $14 billion in debt owed by PDVSA.

PDVSA demanded that service companies accept a 40% cut in their bills; when they refused, the Venezuelan government seized at least 12 drilling rigs, more than 30 oil terminals, and about 300 boats.

The demonstration was a pointed reminder of a 2007 incident, which is still playing out in the international courts. Two years ago, Venezuela forced six oil majors to hand over equity stakes of 60% or more to PDVSA. However, Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE: XOM) and Conoco Phillips (NYSE: COP) opted to walk away from their contracts rather than accept a minority role.

This conflict is still being disputed, and last year Exxon won a court order to freeze $12 billion in assets from PDVSA as compensation for its lost projects. Additionally, Chavez’s heavy-handed policy has cost the country untold billions worth of oil-related investments, as many oil majors now refuse to operate there

“There is the uncertain outlook over how the extensive nationalization pursued over the past 12 years will pan out,” Alvise Marino, an analyst at Ideaglobal, told The Wall Street Journal. “Based on the government’s unimpressive track record on the economic management front, we tend to take a less-than-optimistic view.”

The Colombia Conundrum

In addition to alienating foreign oil majors, Chavez has also sequestered Venezuela from many of its neighbors, especially Colombia. Chavez has ordered his country to prepare for an outright “rupture of relations” with Colombia after that country gave the United States permission to use its military bases.

The United States says access to the bases will help it fight drug trafficking, but Chavez has his own theory. He says American use of the bases could be used as a launch point for an invasion of his oil rich nation.

“Those seven military bases are a declaration of war,” Chavez said last week. “We must prepare for the rupture in relations with Colombia. There is no possibility of a return [to normal relations] with Colombia, an embrace.”

However, cutting off ties with Colombia poses yet another economic hurdle for the Venezuelan economy to overcome. Colombia provided about $6 billion in products to Venezuela in 2008, or about 15% of Venezuela’s total imports, according to Venezuela’s government statistics institute INE.

In fact, when Chavez closed the border for three days in 2006, there was shortage of food in Venezuela.

Chavez can turn to other South American countries, but his credit extends only so far.

“Nobody wants to sell to Venezuela if payment isn’t made in advance,” José Rozo, president of Fedecámaras Táchira, the region’s main business association, told the Latin American Herald Tribune

About 70% of trade activity in Venezuela depends on imports from Colombia, Rozo said, adding that the only country that had been willing to export on credit had been Colombia.

Without Colombia, Venezuela will have to settle for trade terms that heavily favor its partners.

For instance, Argentine President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner made a visit to Venezuela last month, and signed no less than 22 accords. Virtually all of the deals were in Argentine’s favor, the Tribune reported.

“We’re going to drive a horse and cart through all the regulations if they want to do business with us,” an Argentine official told the paper prior to the signing of the deals. “Prompt payment. Simple procedures. Fewer controls. Less bureaucracy. No delays. Hard currency. I’ll tell you the rest when I’ve thought of them.”

That means if Venezuela wants to keep doing business with Argentina, it’s going to have to pay more.

And that will fuel inflation.

“The cost of purchasing in Argentina is higher, and that means that prices will be higher in Venezuela,” Abelardo Daza, an economics professor at Caracas-based IESA business school, told The Journal.

Source: Is Venezuela’s Stagflation the Beginning of the End for Chavez?

The first was an unprecedented $41 billion liquefied natural gas (LNG) deal with Australia, which was announced last week. The deal calls for PetroChina Co. Ltd. (NYSE: PTR) – Asia’s largest oil and gas company – to buy 2.25 million tons per year of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the Gorgon field in Western Australia over a period of 20 years.

It is the largest deal ever brokered between the two nations.

The Gorgon field has yet to be developed but is considered to be a key global resource and an economic boon for Australia.

“The Gorgon Project is globally and nationally significant with a resource base of more than 40 trillion cubic feet of gas and an estimated economic life of at least 40 years from the time of start-up,” said Chevron Australia Managing Director, Roy Krzywosinski.

“Furthermore, the Gorgon Project is Australia’s largest single resource project and is set to deliver significant economic benefits and create around 10,000 indirect and direct jobs during peak construction.”

Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX) owns and operates 50% of the field.

Yet this is just one of the mega-deals signed between China and Australia. China was Australia’s second largest merchandise trade partner in 2008 with two-way trade of $56.3 billion (A$67.74 billion). Australian exports to China grew 37% in 2008 from the previous year to $27 billion (A$32.48 billion) and comprised chiefly of raw and lightly processed farm, mineral and energy products.

“China needs us, we need China,” said Australian Trade Minister Simon Crean.

Of course, China’s demand for natural gas and other resources is growing so fast that it needs more than Australia.  That’s why the Red Dragon recently signed a $5.6 billion deal with a consortium of energy companies operating off the coast of Myanmar.

The consortium, led by South Korea’s Daewoo International Corp., will supply China National United Oil Corp. (CNUOC) with 500 million cubic feet of natural gas a year from 2013 to 2043. The supply, which will come from Myanmar’s A-1 and A-3 offshore blocks, amounts to about 7% of China’s current gas consumption, Reuters reported.

The consortium – which also includes India’s Oil and Natural Gas Corp., Myanmar Oil & Gas Enterprise, India’s GAIL Ltd., and Korea Gas Corp. – will invest a total of $5.6 billion in the project and be responsible for production and offshore pipeline transportation.

Land transportation will be jointly managed with CNUOC. The two parties also plan to build oil and gas pipelines through Myanmar and into China’s southwestern Yunnan province, Reuters reported.

Few Western countries, or Western companies do business with Myanmar, which has been heavily criticized for its human rights violations. The military junta that controls the country is considered one of the most repressive and brutal regimes in the world today. Forced labor, child labor, human trafficking, and instances of sexual abuse are widespread.

However, China, which has itself been a target among human rights watchdogs, chooses to overlook these discretions, preferring instead to focus on Myanmar’s resources. And in its defense, China is rightly concerned about securing enough raw materials to support its booming economy and a population of about 1.3 billion people.

Natural gas, for instance, accounts for just 3% of China’s total energy needs, but its use is expected to grow rapidly as energy demand increases. China currently consumes about 7.3 billion cubic feet per day, but that is expected to grow at a 10% compound annual rate to 18 billion cubic feet per day by 2020, according to Bernstein Research.

And China is doing the right thing by securing long-term supplies of natural gas now, while prices are low and supplies are high. It’s taken similar action with other commodities over the past year, stocking up on large amounts oil, copper, and iron ore as prices swooned.

China Gases Up While Prices Are Low

Natural gas prices yesterday (Thursday) fell to levels not seen since 2002 after the U.S. Energy Department said the amount of gas in storage hit a record high for this time of year.

Natural gas stockpiles rose by 52 billion cubic feet to about 3.2 trillion cubic feet in the week ended Aug. 21 –21% above year ago levels. Levels are now so high that some experts believe the United States will run out of storage capacity before winter begins.

“We have never been here before in terms of what to expect when storage gets this high,” Aubrey K. McClendon, Chief Executive Officer of Chesapeake Energy Corp. (NYSE: CHK), told the New York Times. “It’s like a balloon; there comes a point where you can’t blow any more air into it.”

Natural gas prices tumbled more than 6% to $2.725 per 1,000 cubic feet of gas on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), a price not seen since Aug. 7 2002, The Associated Press reported.

However, now that gas prices have tumbled roughly 80% from last year’s high above $13, some investors believe the market is bottoming out – or at the very least, significantly below its fair value.

Chesapeake Energy stock has risen nearly 8% in the past month, despite plunging prices and mounting inventories. Devon Energy Corp. (NYSE: DVN) is up about a 5.5%.

“The perception is that gas has finally gotten to its lowest point, so people are buying exploration and production stocks,” Marshall Adkins, energy analyst at Raymond James Financial Inc. (NYSE: RJF), told Reuters.

However, Adkins does not expect a rebound to come any time soon. His firm expects natural gas prices to fall below $2.50 per thousand cubic feet in the months ahead as an inventory overhang overshadows gas’ attractive price.

Still, there’s good reason to believe gas prices will have a strong rally in early 2010. To begin with, gas companies are slashing production exploration in dramatic fashion.

Newfield Exploration Company, for instance, has announced the plans to voluntarily curtail about 2.5 billion of cubic feet equivalent of gas of its third quarter of 2009 production in response to the recent lull in prices.

U.S. producers have cut the number of rigs drilling for new gas by more than half since Sept. 2008. Oil-services company Baker Hughes Inc. (NYSE: BHI) recently reported that 688 gas rigs were active in the United States, down about 56% from one year ago.

“We think the decline curve for production will be fairly steep because of the big drop in drilling,” Rich Howard, manager of the Prospector Capital Appreciation fund, told CNNMoney.

Source: China Landing Natural Gas Deals as Prices Plummet

After spending three days visiting the restive eastern province of Zhejiang, Premier Wen Jiabao argued for maintaining the loose economic policies implemented under the stimulus program, saying it’s too soon to be “blindly optimistic,” according to a statement by the State Council.

His remarks are likely to fuel an ongoing debate between government officials over whether it’s time to rein in bank lending.

After the government called on Chinese banks to provide increased liquidity to the economy, they lent about $1.08 trillion (7.37 trillion yuan) in the first half of the year – almost 50% over the government’s target of $732 billion (5 trillion yuan), and nearly double the total loans extended throughout all of 2008.

Most analysts credit the stimulus program for China’s economic rebound, as GDP expanded by 7.9% in the second quarter, up from 6.1% in the first quarter. But now some officials have voiced concerns that asset bubbles and non-performing loans could threaten a long-term economic recovery.

Last week, Chinese Legislator Yin Zhongqing called for limiting new loans to 10 trillion yuan for the full year, according to the Wall Street Journal.

The benchmark Shanghai Composite Index (SSE) is down 15% this month, amid fears that the government will move to tighten bank lending in the second half of the year to throw a wet blanket on the economy. The SSE, Chinas’ benchmark index, zoomed 91% from Jan. 1 to Aug. 4, hitting a high of 3,478.01.

China’s cabinet yesterday (Wednesday) said it’s watching for signs of overcapacity in industries including steel and cement and will increase “guidance” in the coal, glass and power sectors.  It will also place new restrictions on stocks and bonds sold by companies in those industries.

And continuing another trend, the People’s Bank of China last week in an internal memorandum notified its branches to curtail lending for the remainder of the year.  Other Chinese banks, including the Industrial & Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) and China Construction Bank (CBC), have also curbed lending in recent months, Reuters reported, citing anonymous sources.

The Chinese bi-monthly Caijing reported that with the new ceilings in place, ICBC has already lent 83% of its full-year new lending total, while CCB has lent 79%.

Other bankers reported that liquidity appears to be drying up and that loan approvals are taking longer than normal.

“It takes more time to process credit approval from Beijing headquarters now, and the pricing for onshore deals has been heading north in recent months, particularly for U.S. dollar deals,”a banker familiar with the process told Reuters.

And while the going rate for loans to top-tier multinational companies in the first half of the year were made at a margin of 150 basis points above the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), margins have now soared to over 200 basis points, according to the same banker.

Still, Beijing is unlikely to pull back from the massive stimulus program and the resulting liquidity that has bolstered the world’s third-biggest economy.  Even with the slowdown, analysts still expect total lending to exceed $1.5 trillion ($10 trillion yuan) this year.

And Premier Wen has called on policymakers to maintain “moderately loose” monetary policy and “active” fiscal policy.

That means the Chinese economy will remain flush with liquidity for the foreseeable future. And just to be on the safe side, the China’s State Council has issued a directive to banks to provide more loans to smaller firms.

“We will give appropriate subsidies to financial institutions to support them in extending loans to small companies,” the council said following a regular weekly meeting.

It also will extend measures to reduce the social security contributions paid by smaller firms that are facing difficulties and will increase tax support and direct government funding for them.

“This is tightening but it’s not a total shutdown,” Ken Peng, an economist with Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) in Beijing told Bloomberg News. “Policy hasn’t reversed but they are contemplating moves that have a lesser impact on the broader economy.”

Source: China Curbs Bank Lending but Vows to Keep Liquidity High

And it’s a region that holds the key to growth opportunities that could eclipse the growth in the BRIC countries.

In fact, this region collectively has a bigger economy than Brazil, Russia or India already. And in terms of growth, it is growing faster than any of these countries. In terms of population, it’s bigger than the U.S. and nearly as populous the EU. It holds 60% of the world’s proven oil reserves and nearly half of its natural gas.

That last clue probably gives it away. I’m talking about the Middle East and North Africa, or MENA.

Among its largest economies are Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

In one of my presentations at Agora Financial’s 10th Annual Investment Symposium in Vancouver, I focused on the growth in these economies because it touches on nearly everything we’ve talked about here recently – water and food scarcity issues, infrastructure needs, energy and the growth in non-U.S. trade. To start, let’s look at a couple of basic facts that push this along.

The first is explosive population growth. MENA is one of the fastest-growing regions in the world. Over the last 50 years, MENA’s population is up more than fourfold. And the population is still young, with the majority of the population under 25 years old. Over the next 30 years, MENA’s population will grow more than 60%, to nearly 700 million people.

The second is that trade is expanding in this part of the world, as I highlighted in last month’s letter. To show this in a different way, let’s look at Syria.

Yes, Syria. Long a pariah state with which the U.S. maintained frosty relations, all that is beginning to change. In July, the U.S. made a couple of announcements that I thought signaled an important shift. First, the U.S. would send an ambassador to Damascus after a four-year absence. Second, the U.S. would ease export bans to Syria.

But more important than this political thaw is the economic story. Syria has been a mercantile crossroads between East and West since its days as a link on the old Silk Road.

Put Your Money Where China Puts Theirs

The ancient city of Aleppo, for instance, was a key stop along the old Silk Road. Even today, it still has the longest covered market in the Middle East – a souk seven miles long. There you can find goods that take you back in history – soap made from olive oil or silk scarves and keffiyehs of a variety of colors. Head down an alleyway and find gold jewelry and stands of fresh pistachios and sacks of spices and more. Then there are the backstreets of hawkers with lamb – always plenty of lamb – and you smell the scent of lime, garlic and mint.

But much has changed, as Ben Simpfendorfer relates in The New Silk Road. Today, for the first time in 22 years, banks in Syria can set their own interest rates on loans and deposits. Today, you can change money on the street without the threat of a ball and chain winding up around your ankles. A stock market even opened for business in March.

The largest investor in the country is Haier, a Chinese company. It makes 50,000 washing machines and 50,000 microwave ovens in Syria every year. Another Chinese company, Sichuan Machinery Import & Export, recently completed a $180 million hydroelectric plant here. There are big real estate projects, including a new $300 million resort on the Syrian Mediterranean coast. There are some 40,000 new hotel beds coming online in the next three years – up from 48,000 currently. Tourism is already 13% of the economy.

Syria is basically following the “China model” of maintaining a closed political order but carving out free zones and allowing trade.

Of course, this isn’t some Big Rock Candy Mountain fantasy where the sun shines every day on the birds and the bees and the cigarette trees. There are all kinds of problems in Syria, and elsewhere, but I find the changes taking place so far absolutely remarkable.

In a sense, we’ve seen this movie before. Roger Owen wrote the classic study on the Middle East and its place in the economy. In his book, he covers the period 1800-1914. This was a time of growth and transformation. At least a few points are similar to today. Then, as now, the region experienced a huge population growth. The Middle East’s population alone grew 300%. Then, as now, trade grew even faster under a more liberalized economic regime.

Then, the Middle East benefited from growing demand for agricultural goods from European markets. Today, the region benefits from expanded trade with China and the rest of Asia for the region’s oil.

But that’s not to say that oil has solved the problems of the MENA countries…

Right now, these countries are looking to invest in farmland overseas. The Saudis have grabbed farmland in Indonesia. The UAE has locked down farmland in the Sudan and Pakistan. As Eckart Woertz of the Gulf Research Center in Dubai says: “In a global food crisis, you may find it difficult to secure food supplies at any price no matter how many oil revenues you have.”

When I got back home from Vancouver, there was an issue of The Economist waiting for me. It had a cover story on the Arab world titled “Waking From Its Sleep” and a 14-page special report within. What’s happening in this part of the world is starting to get more attention.

The key takeaway from all of this is to recognize this other, non-BRIC, growth engine and the needs and opportunities it creates. Once again, we’ll see enormous investment in food and water resources to feed and slake the thirst of all these people. And we’ll need all of the infrastructure and burn all of the hydrocarbons that come with that growth.

Sincerely,
Chris Mayer

Source: Forget BRIC… These Emerging Economies Hold the New Keys to Growth