Louis Basenes (Investment U):

Hundreds of millions of Chinese citizens are on a crash course with the middle class.

A study from The McKinsey Quarterly supports this well-documented phenomenon, which estimates that it will take two decades before the Chinese nouveau riche reaches its full spending potential.

In turn, they’re convinced that decades worth of profits are up for grabs.

I’m not about to refute that claim here. But instead, I want to caution you: Don’t be blinded by the euphoria over Chinese consumers and overlook an equally compelling opportunity in another emerging market.

Let’s head down to Brazil and I’ll explain why – along with the best way to profit, of course…

Sizing Up Brazil’s Profit Potential

Okay, I get that the scale of the Chinese opportunity – a population of 1.31 billion people, compared to Brazil’s 192 million citizens – dwarfs Brazil’s. But that doesn’t mean the profit potential is any less.

On the contrary, in fact… I’d actually say it’s greater when it comes to tapping into a blossoming middle class. In this regard, Brazil boasts several notable advantages over China…

• It’s a democratic nation, not a communist one.
• Its population is much younger – the median age is 28.3, compared to 33.6 in China.
• Brazil is far less reliant on exports. Only 14% of Brazil’s GDP comes from exports, compared to 35% from China.
• It already possesses all the natural resources necessary (and then some) to support its booming economy. Meanwhile, China needs to go out and gobble up foreign assets to ensure it can keep feeding its economic machine with enough oil, gas, coal, iron ore, etc.

But most important of all is the cultural difference. The Chinese are notorious savers, yet Brazilians love to spend, spend, spend. And don’t just take my word for it. As Illan Goldfajn, Chief Economist at Brazilian bank, Itaú, reveals, “If the world is looking for savers, Brazil is not much good… But if it’s looking for consumers, then we might be able to help.”

Click here for the rest of Mr. Basenese’s analysis at Investment U.

What’s he talking about? Today, we take a look and invest right alongside his idea. And it should start to pay off with the arrival of the first swallows of spring in 2010. It’s also timely now — in this weak-kneed economy — because it has traditionally held up well even in when the economy is on the ropes. Even the Great Depression couldn’t put this thing down.

We start with simple truths. The world’s population has more than doubled since 1950 — from about 2.5 billion to 6.7 billion. By 2050, there will be more than 9 billion people on the planet. Almost all of this growth will come from undeveloped markets such as China and India. And they will all be doing one thing, for sure — eating.

Now, hang on. I know that is a banal insight by itself, but this story has layers like a tiramisu. The second layer is the mix of food eaten, which is important. These undeveloped economies are getting richer. Predictably, as people everywhere have done and continue to do when they have a little more money in their pockets, they change their diets. They spend more on food. The average Chinese spends 40 cents of every additional dollar earned on food. In India, it’s about 70 cents of every additional dollar. What do they buy?

Read the rest of the story at PennySleuth.com.

Qatar’s greatest asset is its natural gas reserves. In fact, the largest gas field in the world is here. Its discoverers were disappointed when they found it in 1971. They were looking for oil.

The boom Qatar now enjoys is the result of some daring investments in liquefied natural gas (LNG) back when people thought doing such a thing was a little batty. Faisal Al Suwaidi, the head of Qatargas, deserves the props for his wager, which have paid off handsomely. Today, Qatar produces about one-quarter of the world’s natural gas.

Qatar supplies such faraway customers as Japan, India and China. Qatargas also operates the largest LNG terminal in Europe at South Hook on the Welsh coast. This facility provides Britain with a fifth of its gas needs.

Qatar’s dominant position has filled its coffers and changed the country forever. On a per capital basis, it is one of the wealthiest countries in the world. And given the world’s growing energy demands and the appeal of clean-burning (and cheaper) natural gas when compared with oil, Qatar seems in a good position.

In Dubai, the story is quite different, as Dubai does not have Qatar’s gas reserves, nor does it have much oil. Dubai’s story is one of trade and finance.

As I write, the sun is just peeking over the horizon. It is dawn in Dubai. Out my hotel window, I can see two buildings with cranes over them and in the distance another building in scaffolding. For a city that was once booming and turned bust – as with most places – there is still a lot of construction going on.

As recently as September 2008, realtors could claim that no one had lost money in the Dubai property market. That’s no longer true. In fact, now the market has too much of just about every property type. One headline story noted how 32,000 homes are about to come on the market next year, which is a big number to choke down in any city. Dubai had a huge property boom and now must suffer the flip side.

The hotels, too, are pretty empty. We are staying at the new Address Hotel downtown, which has been open for only 25 days, we are told. I’m the first person to stay in my room. It still has that new carpet smell.

I wandered down for breakfast and was alone in a cavernous dining room. The hotel is brand-spanking new and everything looks wonderful. It’s just mostly empty. I think there are more hotel workers than there are guests.

In Dubai, revenue per room is down 35% from a year ago. Yet there is still an expansion going on. Next year, estimates call for a 15% increase in the number of rooms. This would mean a 40% increase in two years.

Over breakfast, I perused my complimentary copy of The National. One of the things I like to do in a foreign city is to read the local newspapers. I’m kind of a newspaper junkie anyway – I get three dailies delivered to my doorstep at home. In any event, I always find interesting nuggets from a perspective you might not get if all you read is The Wall Street Journal or Financial Times.

Today’s business page carried an array of tales… There was the arrival in Doha of a new LNG tanker, fresh from Seoul’s shipbuilding docks. There was a story about how UAE consumer confidence is up. Also, notes on bond issues in the Gulf, the latest figures on money supply in Kuwait (it’s rising at a frighteningly quick pace of 18.7%), the price of villas in Dubai and more. All sorts of little odds and ends that help paint the picture.

There was also a lot of chatter about infrastructure, which I found particularly interesting. Abu Dhabi, the capital of the UAE, which I will visit on this trip, is looking to raise $100 billion for infrastructure projects. From The National: “The emirate needs to fund new transport, electricity and telecommunications schemes…”

Dubai itself also has ambitious infrastructure spending plans. Last night, as we made our way to our hotel, we could see the new Dubai Metro stops along the way, which, lit up as they were in soft blue and white twinkling lights, looked like something out of the future.

Incredibly, the Dubai government last year spent about 45% of its budget on infrastructure projects – mostly on the roads and ports. But there is a lot more on tap, as The National reports:

“Dubai could invest as much as $20 billion in desalination projects in the next decade alone as it increases its water output by 2.72 billion liters a day… [There are also] plans to add 14,405 megawatts by 2017… Construction costs for those new plants amount to $11.6 billion, while infrastructure costs, including substations and transmission lines, will be about $11.6 billion.”

This massive build-out is not unique to Dubai, or even the UAE. There are also big infrastructure projects of all kinds in India and China and other emerging markets.

Regards,

Chris Mayer

Source: Greetings from Qatar!

I think that’s wrong. It’s an erroneous viewpoint that’s symptomatic of the short memories of the chattering media. It’s also one that could cause investors to miss out on one of the best profit plays in the global marketplace today.

I’m talking about Germany – the real powerhouse of Europe.

The “New” Germany

From the 1950s to the 1980s, West Germany consistently delivered high growth rates and low inflation. West German engineering proved superior to any other on the planet. And West German living standards rose far above anywhere else in Europe.

Then came 1990.

East and West Germany were reunited and an economic malaise set in. Instead of unifying the two currencies at a ratio of two Ostmarks to one Deutsche Mark, which would have kept East German labor cheap and competitive, the politicians unified the currencies at a rate of one to one.

That meant that East German labor was instantly priced out of the world market. And with good reason: It now offered Soviet-sector efficiency and skill – but at West German costs levels. Consequently, East Germany went through more than a decade of very high unemployment. German taxpayers went through more than a decade of huge subsidies to the former East Germany to prop up that region’s living standards and retrain its labor.

However, since the excellent German high school education system was quickly established throughout the country, the burden of reunification was a problem that did not last forever. What ultimately happened was that younger, fully trained workers in East Germany replaced their inferior Communist-era parents.

From about 2005 onward, the financial cloud of reunification costs began to lift. During the last few years, Germany’s economic performance has been notably better than its European competitors. Against Italy alone, for example, Germany’s competitiveness has improved by more than 20% since Europe’s currencies were unified in 1999.

The German economy has been held down by a tax burden that’s high by global standards. Its tax system suffers from excessive complexity and from draconian enforcement. Small businesses, for example must pay a 14% trade tax – on top of the standard corporate income tax that all businesses must pay. The trade tax goes to the “lander” (the states), rather than to the federal government.

Despite such problems, Germany has played it smart in several key areas. Unlike the United States and many other countries, Germany did not engage in fiscal stimulus. Indeed, the Social Democrat Finance Minister Peer Steinbruck last winter referred to Britain’s huge fiscal stimulus plans as “crass Keynesianism.” That showed that Germany has a true consensus against the stimulus foolishness. Germany’s budget deficit is expected by The Economist panel of forecasters to be only 4.6% of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2009, far below its rich-country competitors. Thus, even though Germany’s taxes are high, they will not be forced further upwards by zooming budget deficits.

The Angela Merkel Era Begins

Merkel’s election as German Chancellor is important, because it enables her to govern in coalition with the most free-market party, the Free Democrats, who are committed to lowering taxes and freeing up some of Germany’s restrictive labor laws.

This should not be taken too far. The Free Democrat leader Guido Westerwelle, flushed with victory, pledged Sunday night that the new government would act “responsibly” – not exactly “Hope and Change” as a slogan! Nevertheless, the Frankfurt market rose on the election result, as it should have done.

Germany is sometimes knocked for its export orientation. Its balance-of-payments surplus was $179.4 billion for the fiscal year that ended June 30, and is expected to be 4.0% of GDP this year.

Rest assured, however, that this is strength, and not a weakness. With world trade recovering, the German economy can be expected to benefit. Just look at Germany’s auto sector, which may be the most well rounded in the world. It boasts such strong luxury brands as Mercedes (NYSE ADR: DAI), Porsche and Audi. And it includes such high-volume – but innovative – manufacturers as Volkswagen AG (OTC ADR: VLKAY). German automakers are likely to gain market share against faltering U.S. competitors in the coming global recovery.

Another plus: Germany’s savings rate rose to 12.8% of GDP in the first half of 2009, a 16-year record. That compares with the feeble rate of only 4% in the United States, up from close to zero in the preceding three years. In a competitive world with the financial sector in difficulty, it’s better to be a capital-rich country running a trade surplus than the opposite, like the United States.

The economic recovery is a mixed bag from one market to another. But in Germany, it seems in Germany to be proceeding briskly. GDP, which fell sharply in the first quarter, rose at a 1.3% annual rate in the second quarter. Manufacturing orders rose by 3.5% in July, after a 3.8% rise in June. The ZEW index of economic sentiment has risen in each of the last six months, reaching a healthy 57.7 (50 is neutral) in September.

With competitive manufacturing, a business-friendly government and plenty of domestic capital, Germany is about as healthy an economy as there is in the world today. You should think about staking a claim to this outlook, even if it’s only the MSCI Germany Exchange-Traded Fund (NYSE: EWG).

Source: Why You Should Invest in the ‘New’ Germany

Weaker-than-expected U.S. housing sales and durable goods orders on Friday drove U.S. stocks lower, and world and European stocks followed that trend on Monday.

Leaders of the Group of 20 rich and developing nations pledged on Friday to bring the global economy back into balance but their statement contained few surprises and investors are already looking ahead to U.S. employment data at the end of this week.

Global equities and other higher risk assets have risen sharply in the last six months on growing optimism about the economic outlook, but markets are starting to run out of impetus, analysts say.

“Investors are a little bit reluctant to add to their risk positions,” said Koen De Leus, economist at KBC Securities.

“The market is going to have a very good look at macroeconomic numbers this week. If some of these figures disappoint, then the market is going to go down further.”

Analysts are starting to question whether the global recovery is V-shaped, or if it could be W-shaped, with a second dip to come.

The MSCI world equity index <.MIWD00000PUS> was down 0.52 percent at 282.94, bringing losses since Sept 22 to 3 percent.

U.S. stock index futures , however, were indicating a slightly stronger open on Wall Street after the market scored a third consecutive day of losses on Friday.

The FTSEurofirst 300 index <.FTEU3> hit its lowest in nearly three weeks before trimming losses to 982.53, down 0.14 percent from the U.S. close.

GERMAN STOCKS UP

German stocks <.GDAXI>, however, rose 1.3 percent with particularly strong gains in utilities E.ON and RWE , on expectations of longer lifetimes for German nuclear power plants as a result of the German election.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s conservatives won a weekend parliamentary election with the pro-business Free Democrats (FDPP), enabling her to end her awkward four-year-old partnership with the Social Democrats (SPD).

“(This) government provides the greatest opportunities for equity market-friendly reforms compared to other party combinations,” said Tammo Greetfeld, equity strategist at Unicredit, in a client note.

The yen, typically regarded as a safe-haven currency, surged to an eight-month high against the dollar as Japanese officials waved off any plans to stem the currency’s rise.

The yen later gave up some gains as Finance Minister Hirohisa Fujii changed gear on his comments during the course of the day, saying yen gains were becoming one-sided just hours after saying the rise was “not abnormal”.

The dollar fell as far as 88.26 yen before trimming losses to 89.35, down 0.31 percent.

However, the dollar hit a 2-1/2 week high against an index of currencies <.DXY> and a 13-day high against the euro as the U.S. currency also attracted safe-haven flows.

Funds are starting to shift money home ahead of the quarter-end later this week, analysts say.

Crude oil dipped 20 cents to $65.82 a barrel .

Euro zone government bonds also benefited from safety trades, with 10-year yields briefly hitting a one-month low.

December Bund futures were up 5 ticks, trimming earlier gains.

Sept 28 (Reuters)

And with good reason. The United States has a bigger and more-troubled financial sector than most countries. It also has a bigger overhang from the housing bubble, has a bigger balance-of-payments deficit and has a budget deficit that’s fat enough to stall the recovery.

It would be nice to have an economic recovery to invest in that didn’t have all of these problems.

Truth be told, such an investment play does exist. What’s more, the market I have in mind is advanced enough for us to invest in it without having to go through all the rigmarole of American Depository Receipt (ADR) investing. Nor will you have to make a potentially risky foray out onto some foreign stock exchange to buy the shares, because they are almost all listed here.

The country I’m talking about is Canada. Think of it as being like home – but without the problems that our home market (the United States) currently suffers from.

Our Healthy Neighbor to the North

When the recession struck, Canada was hit by it quite badly, but for different reasons from its southern neighbor. The Canadian housing market was nowhere near as overheated as its U.S. counterpart. So Canada’s housing downturn wasn’t as deep.

And what about the banking systems? To be sure, Canadian banks received a bailout, but it was less than $20 billion in total. Compare that to the veritable alphabet soup of U.S. bailout programs ranging from “TARP” and “TALF” that have injected more than $2 trillion into the U.S. financial system.

On the other hand, natural resources prices crashed last autumn, which had a major effect on Canada’s resource-based economy. A number of large projects in the Athabasca Tar Sands region were cancelled, for example – since this region has oil reserves around the size of the entire Middle East, its development is crucial to Canada’s future.

The “loonie,” Canada’s currency, declined from around “parity” to the U.S. dollar to an exchange ratio of C$1.30=$1 U.S. In effect, this was a “flight to safety” into the dollar and U.S. Treasuries. And it affected Canada as it did other countries.

In 2009, however, Canada and the United States have traveled down totally different paths. Canada did very little “stimulus,” so its state budget is in much better shape. The deficit for the 2009-2010 fiscal year $53 billion (C$56 billion) is only about 4% of gross domestic product (GDP). For the 2010-2011 fiscal year, the deficit is expected to be about $42 billion (C$45 billion), or 3.2% of GDP.

Energy Powers the Rally

The bounce in natural resources prices has really helped power up the rebound of Canada’s market.

Investment in the tar-sands region has picked up again, with a big merger between the two largest tar-sands-extraction companies: Suncor Energy Inc. (NYSE: SU) and Petro-Canada. The rising gold price hasn’t hurt either – mines are appearing all over the place! All this new activity has made the loonie bounce, so it’s back to about C$1.07=$1. While interest rates are as low as the United States, the Bank of Canada hasn’t done much “quantitative easing,” meaning that inflation isn’t too much of a worry.

The strong loonie helps here, too.

Canada seems to be recovering nicely. Its index of leading indicators jumped 1.1% in August, while manufacturing sales grew 5.5% in July. The country presently runs a modest current account deficit, but it’s only 2% of GDP. That’s much lower than even the current U.S. deficit, let alone that of 2007. It had a little more public debt than the United States in 2008, but given current U.S. deficits, those two lines almost certainly have crossed by now.

There are two caveats. The first is an obvious one: If commodity prices crash to earth, Canada will have some difficulty because commodities are a large part of its economy. Personally, I don’t see that happening. It’s notable that PetroChina Co. Ltd. (NYSE ADR: PTR) has just invested $1.7 billion in a Canadian tar sands project, so China must not think so, either.

The other risk is political. The current minority Conservative government of Stephen Harper has done a good job, but the opposition Liberals have withdrawn their parliamentary support. That means there may be an election this autumn. A Liberal majority government would be no disaster. They might be a bit sticky about oil-drilling permits, but would not otherwise rock the boat.

However, a Liberal coalition with the leftist New Democrats could push public spending and the deficit up, and there’s no guarantee against that. (One of the problems with multi-party systems like Canada’s is there is an almost infinite variety of possible governments after each election, some of which can be fairly alarming from a business perspective.)

However, Canadian elections are a much smaller risk than you get in most countries, and the commodity/oil price crash, if it happened, would help the U.S. economy and, presumably, your U.S. portfolio. So it’s worth having some Canadian exposure, perhaps with the Canadian market exchange traded fund (ETF) iShare MSCI Canada Index (NYSE: EWC).

For years it was almost fashionable to dismiss Canada from an economic standpoint. Now, however, that may well be where the smart money would like to go. As an economy, Canada is competent and stable.

It’s the kind of country that looks to be a good place for some of our money.

Leaders of the Group of 20 meet on Thursday and Friday in Pittsburgh and U.S. President Barack Obama said on Sunday he would push world leaders for a reshaping of the global economy in response to the crisis.

World stocks, measured by MSCI have risen over 26 percent this year, recouping more than half of last year’s losses, underpinned by repeated pledges by G20 policymakers to keep emergency support for the economy in place.

“The market might look slightly overbought near term, but the economy is definitely improving, corporate profits are definitely improving, interest rates are staying low, valuations aren’t expensive,” said Nick Nelson, European equity strategist at UBS. MSCI world equity index <.MIWD00000PUS> fell 0.7 percent, while the FTSEurofirst 300 index <.FTEU3> lost 0.6 percent.

Emerging stocks <.MSCIEF> also dropped 0.6 percent.

U.S. stock futures were down around 0.5 percent , paring losses after Dell said it would acquire Perot Systemsfor $3.9 billion. Perot System’s shares surged 66 percent in pre-market trading.

EXIT STRATEGY

The Fed is expected to keep its benchmark Fed Funds rate unchanged at 0.25 percent on Wednesday, and investors are looking for signs of how quickly it might remove its extraordinary programmes to revive lending and hiring.

While any signal that the Fed might start unwinding its loose monetary policy shows the central bank is acknowledging the recovery, it could be negative for risky assets as it could fan speculation of an interest rate hike.

The Fed has pledged to buy up to $1.45 trillion of mortgage-backed securities and debt issued by government sponsored Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by end-2009.

Concerns about weak fuel demand pushed U.S. crude oil down 2.4 percent to $70.25 a barrel after Asia’s No.1 refiner Sinopec said that diesel China continued to lag economic recovery with fuel sales so far this year still below the rates seen a year ago.

The September bund future was steady, unable to take advantage of falling equities and investors grew concerned about the prospect of euro zone and U.S. debt supply.

The dollar <.DXY> rose 0.6 percent against a basket of major currencies, after hitting a one-year low last week, while the U.S. currency rose 1 percent to 92.21 yen .

“The yen may end up being the biggest winner against the dollar. It has yet to significantly overshoot against the dollar, unlike every other G10 currency. Real yields are moving in its favour and nominal yields versus the U.S. are negligible,” Deutsche Bank said in a note to clients.

“Dollar/yen will likely break below last year’s low of 87 and could even reach 80 over the next 3-6 months.”

Sterling fell to a five-month low of 90.79 pence per euro after the Bank of England said the British currency’s long-run sustainable exchange rate may have fallen due to an increased focus on Britain’s economic imbalances following the global credit crisis.

(Reuters Sept. 21)

Nowadays, we’ve got an insolvent financial system and a meddling government…but we’ve also got a questionable stock market rally too (one driven by the unprecedented volume on bailout stocks, might I add). Throw in growing Chinese demand and jewelry-buying season in India, and you just might be looking at a foothold in the US$1,000/ounce range.

“My forecast for gold in 2010 is $1,250 to $1,350 an ounce,” says our Investment Director Eric Roseman, “I think we’re long overdue for a major break-out north of $1,000 that will easily crack the March 2008 all-time high of $1,033 intraday.”

Source: Global Investor: Gold Breaks $1,000/Ounce

There is a buzz in the commodities markets this week. Just about anything that can be pulled from the ground is surging in value. Everything, that is, but natural gas.

Most notably, gold is just about ready to reach over the critical $1,000 level, proving that investors are looking for safety. Even without a hint of inflation, the precious metal has surged by over 5% so far this week.

The quick run means the world’s gold miners are surging in value. The more leverage packed into their balance sheets, the higher their prices are going to go.

So far, Yumana Gold (NYSE:AUY) is up by nearly 20% this week, while AngloGold Ashanti (NYSE:AU) is up by over 15%.

It is a similar situation for the silver industry. As investors search for tangible value, the silver industry is taking its investors on a wild ride.

One of the more popular ways of playing the trend, the iShares Silver Trust ETF (NYSE:SLV) was up by as much as 5%, taking the week’s gains into double-digit territory.

TFN Strategic Trader subscribers love the action. Our call options are worth 66% more this afternoon than they were this morning.

The juicy story

Now, I realize you come to TFN sight looking for more than the usual take on the day’s news. Fortunately, our friends over in Russia are creating more than enough action to feed our appetite for story material.

As if the government-centric action unfolding around the Chinese commodity market was not enough to prove my prediction and profit potential of the “Commodities Carry Trade,” the Russian government is stepping into the ring to create some action on its own.

Unable to secure a firm economic future through normal economic means, Putin is “calling” for the country’s banks to start buying Mechel’s (NYSE:MTL) debt. There are also rumors of strong tax breaks heading towards the large Russian miner.

Not only is this yet another wrinkle in my Commodity Carry Trade theory, it helps prove that the effort truly is becoming a global phenomenon.

With their economies weak and the world’s banking industry even weaker, governments are quickly turning to the commodities market for their financial security.

Why invest in paper backed by a desperate government when you can invest in a commodity the world will need no matter what happens in the coming years?

No questioning the profit potential

While there are lots of facets affecting this trade, one thing that is certain is it will be extremely bullish for the commodities market.

We are seeing a mere glimpse of things to come.

Once demand surpassed production… stand back. Prices will soar.

I have a fantastic way to take advantage of this situation, but I absolutely cannot give it away to a wide audience.

Its value was up by nearly 50% today with a trading volume of just 287 trades. Imagine what would happen if thousands of eager investors suddenly jumped in.

If you want me to email you with the trade to make, just click here.

Finally, just to prove there is an exception to every rule, natural gas prices are hitting yet another new low today, dropping the to a paltry $2.50 per million BTUs.

Could it be that foreign investors want nothing to do with an American-based economy? Or is the bearish action a result of the growing inventory glut across the globe?

Now that some of the world’s most powerful governments are getting in on the action, the commodity trade is not going anywhere anytime soon.

This is exciting stuff that is going to drastically change the commodities industry. The situation has profit opportunity written all over it.

I say we take advantage of it.

Source: Russia’s Maneuvering Boosts the Commodities Market

After 54 years of near-single-party rule – not to mention two decades of economic malaise – it’s not surprising that voters eager for change delivered a landslide election victory to the opposition in that key Asian nation.

Last weekend’s Japanese election represents a major milestone for Japan, and may well change the world’s second-largest economy in unexpected ways. Many of things we think we know about Japan may simply have been policies of a Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which has been in power for all but about 11 months over the past 54 years.

The “new Japan” may in certain respects be very different.

For example, we think of Japan as a country dedicated to exports. The big exporters are aided by cheap loans. Upon retirement, senior government bureaucrats get jobs with those exporters, a practice known as amakudari – descent from heaven. Not surprisingly, Japan runs a more or less permanent trade surplus.

Under the new Democratic Party of Japan government of Yukio Hatoyama, that may change. Hatoyama has pledged to end “amakudari” – even as he reorients the economy towards domestic spending. If he succeeds, the exporters may do less well, but the economy may be more balanced. As a result, Japan’s economy may finally begin the economic recovery that Japanese consumers have been awaiting for 20 years.

Japan is also famous for its infrastructure spending – at its peak in 2001, state-funded infrastructure spending was equal to 6.5% of that country’s gross domestic product (GDP) – a level that’s twice that of Japan, the next-biggest spender.

While anyone who has dealt with Northern Virginia traffic knows that infrastructure spending can be a good thing, much of Japan’s spending was wasted on remote rural areas, which happened to be homes to politically connected LDP barons.

Hatoyama has promised to redirect about 3% of GDP from infrastructure spending to payments to individuals. He will pay each family with children $3,000 per child per year. This should help Japan’s demographic problem – its population is declining and is heavily weighted towards retirees. It will also boost consumer spending, especially among middle-income families.

Hatoyama’s program offers no supply-side remedies for Japan’s economic ailments. Those were the policy of Junichiro Koizumi (Japan’s prime minister from 2001-2006), who seemed to be bringing Japan back from recession. Koizumi’s faction lost out in the LDP power struggle, but may make a comeback. Big-spending Prime Minister Taro Aso has resigned from the party leadership, and his most likely successor, former Japanese Health Minister Yoichi Masuzoe, is a supporter of Koizumi’s approach.

Nevertheless’ Hatoyama’s policies will reorient Japan’s economy towards domestic spending. The danger is Japan’s budget deficit (8.9% of GDP in 2009, according to estimates by The Economist) and its debt. With GDP down this year and spending up, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has estimated Japan’s debt at 217% of GDP by the end of 2009. Only one country has recovered from debt that high – Britain, whose debt hit about 250% of GDP in 1815, only to reach that level again in 1945, at the end of two huge wars.

Hatoyama must hope that Japan’s recovery from this recession is a swift one. A sharp bounce in GDP, maybe 5%-6% growth in the first year, would make the debt level much less daunting, and allow good progress towards balancing the budget. After almost 20 years of near-recession, that’s perhaps not too much to ask.

For investors, Japan looks attractive. The stock market is still trading at less than 30% of its 1990 high. However, the Japanese companies you have heard of are not the ones to buy. They are too large and too oriented towards exports. The construction companies should also be avoided – they have benefited from the fixation on infrastructure.

However, buying smaller Japanese companies is a problem, because they do not have actively traded American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) so you really have to buy them on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. The good news is that some brokers, notably E*TRADE Financial Corp. (Nasdaq: EFTC), will allow you to trade Japanese shares.

If you intend to trade on the Tokyo exchange, you might want to look at some of the Japanese retailers and consumer-goods companies. Even with these more-upbeat prospects, though, you should be careful not to overpay – a Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio of 20 should be your upper limit.

For those without access to the Tokyo market, there are two alternatives. One is the exchange-traded fund (ETF) covering the entire Japanese market, the iShares MSCI Japan Index (NYSE: EWJ). That has market capitalization of $5.26 billion, meaning it has adequate liquidity.

However, too much of it will also be invested in shares of the big exporters and construction companies.

The other alternative therefore is a mutual fund, the Fidelity Japan Smaller Companies Fund (Nasdaq: FJSCX). That has expenses of 1.1% and a total size of $394 million. It represents the most readily available way of investing in domestic Japan.

With the new government, Japan will look very different in a few years. Profit opportunities will arise.

As investors, we should look to capitalize on these changes – as well as the opportunities they create.

Source: Landslide Election Victory in Japan Will Lead to an Avalanche of Future Profits for Global Investors