We all know it is going to happen, so why bother discussing it. Right?

There is no doubt the world’s currency of choice has more pressure stacked against it than ever before. But even with $12 trillion in debt and nearly a trillion of annual interest payments due within the next decade, the greenback is still stronger than it was just sixteen months ago.

While so many of us are betting against the dollar and calling for its demise, plenty more investors are using it as a security net, buying American treasuries to protect themselves in case the bottom really falls out.

With the sun someday going to fade, I could sit in my basement and wait for the big day to come, or I could live my life without worry.

It’s the same thing with the dollar. We could bet against the greenback and profit as it drops, or we could forget about the minimal return potential and keep our eyes looking forward, where the real money is at.

No more Chicken Little

Here’s the scoop. The dollar is likely to fade, at most, six percent below today’s value against the Euro. That’s major erosion for such a massively distributed currency, but six percent over a few years doesn’t stack up to a hill of beans in the grand scheme of things.

I can list a couple of dozen stocks that are up by twice that figure today alone.

No doubt, you should pay attention to the dollar, as a six-percent decay in the value of the world’s most important currency will change all sorts of valuations. But don’t invest in the cause, invest in the effect.

The devaluing of the dollar is no surprise. Even a fifth grader can see what’s ahead over the next decade. That’s why there is so little investment potential directly in the currency. Yet, our stubbornness and human greed will not let our eyes focus on anything but taking advantage of the move.

Let that stuff up to the emotional investors.

While they are focusing on gold and the dollar, investments that will provide double-digit returns at best over the next few years, rational investors need to focus on the many other powerful market forces are at work.

The domestic equities market is a wonderful place to be right now, especially if the dollar is collapsing as fast as we believe it to be.

First, anybody exporting goods will see strong top-line growth as the dollar drops. A six percent fall from our currency equals an automatic six percent surge in revenue growth, without the need for any company to do a thing.

Next, if you are a follower of the green-energy craze, you had better be hoping for a weak dollar. The only thing that will ever wean this country from its dangerous addiction to oil is if crude becomes too expensive relative to our alternatives.

With a dollar that is still in demand across the world, dollar-denominated currencies like crude remain fairly inexpensive. But as Uncle Sam’s reserves dwindle in value, crude prices will move inversely. That is good news for all you folks that took Obama’s advice and invested in the “green” sector.

Finally, the markets run on a risk/reward relationship. The higher the risk, the higher the reward. The lower the risk, the lower the reward. Simple stuff.

If we all know the dollar should weaken, where’s the reward potential? But don’t even begin to think there is no risk in the play.

With Washington in charge, especially the current group of legislators, anything is bound to happen. And now that Obama has is political eye set on “saving the dollar,” the road that lies ahead could be very foggy.

My advice? Watch the dollar. Take note of its moves. But invest in anything but the currency. There is better return potential, with much less risk, elsewhere.

Bill Bonner (The Daily Reckoning, UK):

Poor Goldman Sachs. Everyone is on its case. Criticizing. Carping. Jealous. Envious.

So, today we rise in defense of the Wall Street giant. Yes, the Goldmen may be shysters. But they are honest shysters…

Besides, it was another slow day on Wall Street. Investors are still mulling the news. As we all know, the recession is over. But… what kind of strange recovery is this?

A survey showed that only 1 in 10 workers says his income is going up. This is the lowest reading since 1946.

Meanwhile, the news two days ago was that homebuilding took a dive in October. Work began on 11% fewer houses than the month before. On multi-family dwellings, the figures were worse – down 35%.

Why would homebuilding go down when the economy is supposedly gathering strength? Well, builders were wondering what would happen when they finished the houses. The new house tax credit was due to expire; they weren’t sure the politicians would be witless enough to renew it.

They need not have worried. Give the politicos a chance to do something stupid and they will come through every time. Since the end of October, Congress passed and President Obama signed an extension of the housing credit. Until next April, at least, first time buyers will get an $8,000 credit.

You’d think that would have revived animal spirits a bit in the residential construction industry. But today’s news tells us that mortgage applications are falling – even with lower interest rates.

How come interest rates are falling? Well, here again, we see the heavy hand of the feds. The “quantitative easing” has come to a halt… that is, the Fed is no longer buying US Treasury debt (it doesn’t need to). But its buying of mortgage backed securities continues. That program will last until March of next year.

Still… housing is not cooperating.

This news hasn’t had much impact on Wall Street. All that can be said is that investors have seemed to hesitate for the last couple of days.

Stocks fell softly yesterday, with the Dow down only 11 points. Oil stayed at $79. Gold rose to $1,141. And the euro remained at $1.49.

Investors must still believe in what the Washington Post calls a “lukewarm recovery.” It is like finding a body on the street. You feel for a pulse and discover that it has not quite reached room temperature. It is tepid… Not quite alive. Not quite dead.

Too close to the quick to bury… too close to the grave to boogaloo.

Click here to read the rest of Mr. Bonner’s commentary at The Daily Reckoning, UK edition.

Baltimore – (TFN): All eyes and ears are on the Fed this week. With Bernanke in New York discussing potential new bubbles and the New York Fed getting heat for overpaying AIG’s many creditors, investors are having a tough time knowing exactly who to follow.

For those of you who hold up the “Fire the Fed” signs, move over. I am thinking about joining your camp.

First, the real bad stuff. According to Neil Barofsky, TARP’s special inspector general, New York’s Fed (under the leadership of Tim Geithner) failed to use its leverage as the top-banking regulator to tell AIG’s lenders to take less than they were owed.

Instead of taking an across-the-board “haircut” as Obama and Pelosi told us we all should, finance giants like Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch and Societe Generale said they want 100% of what they were owed.

The only holdout, UBS, said it would be willing to take 98%. But after tough looks from the guys from across the table, that offer was quickly rescinded.

According to Barofsky, the move cost the country billions of dollars and much, much more in confidence for the nation’s banking cops.

Thanks, Tim!

With that bit of news in today’s headlines, it is tough to find the confidence in some of the Fed’s latest plans to help pull the country from financial failure.

As the nation slowly recovers from last fall’s economic collapse, Bernanke and his troops at the Fed are now facing the difficult task of unwinding massive expansionary policies.

One trick discussed today is shortening the length of emergency loans from 90 days to just 24 days starting in January. It’s a pretty mundane move that will have little tangible effect on the markets.

But what could have a much larger impact, with much less transparency, is Bernanke’s recent discussion of paying interest on the reserves banks place with the Fed.

A popular move with many overseas central banks, the interest rates paid on reserves helps to establish a rate floor that regulators can gradually increase without raising overall interest rates.

Essentially, the move is a way of mopping up excessive liquidity without draining or lowering the water in a much larger pool of lending capital.

Like many things, the idea sounds great on paper, but so did letting the Fed negotiate with AIG’s trading partners and we now know how much that cost us.

Let’s face it. The markets like transparency and predictability. Anything less gives us what Friedrich Hayek called “malinvestment.”

As the Fed gets more and more creative in its efforts to boost the economy without creating deadly bubbles, transparency will go out the window.

Toss in growing political pressure from the folks from Washington and one thing is certain.

Anything the Fed does will cost you and I more money.

While today’s record-breaking surge in gold prices is not likely to create $450 million in newfound wealth for any singular investor, it is the day gold bugs have been waiting for.

Thanks to surprising news that India’s central bank shelled out some $6.7 billion to get its hands on 200 metric tons worth of the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) gold stash, the bullion market is on fire today.

Why is this good news?

Several reasons. First, since India’s name is on the receipt, China will have to wait in line to get its gold from the IMF. It’s either that or tread ever so carefully into the volatile spot market.

You see, the IMF’s sale is nothing new. It announced months ago its plans to unload 403.3 metric tons of the golden precious metal into the market.

However, most investors thought China, with its desperate need to diversify its holding of American greenbacks, would be the chief buyer.

But today’s news proves otherwise. It turns out India is on a diversification spree of its own, desperate to hedge against any unfavorable moves in the American dollar.

With just $200 tons left, there is not much gold left for other nation’s to get their hands on. $7 billion worth of cash is nothing for a country like China that right now holds nearly a trillion dollars worth of reserves.

The market’s logic for sending prices higher today is simple supply and demand. With less surplus available from the IMF, countries looking to diversify will have to hit the spot market.

Higher demand equals higher prices.

I have been writing about China’s growing commodities carry trade for months now.

It is the process where Beijing (and now India, evidently) uses its pile of increasingly depreciating dollars to buy commodities. It then sits on the commodities for a bit and sells them at a premium in the domestic currency.

This phenomenon alone creates fantastic commodities market bullishness.

But for gold longs, the timing of today’s announcement from the IMF could not have been better. It meshes perfectly with the increasing volatile equities market.

Not only can gold bugs raise prices due to increased diversification demand, but they can also raise their asking price due to increased flight to safety.

With the American market looking weaker by the minute and unemployment just about ready to climb into double-digit territory, gold just may be the one asset worth more in six months than it is today.

While an intraday surge of nearly $25 may appear as a major move after the incremental adjustments we have seen over the past few weeks, it represents a mere 2% change in the assets value.

Let me tell you, there is a lot more where that came from.

Throughout the “sh*t hitting the fan” events of last fall, and the subsequent policy response, we’ve listened intently on what this Canadian had to say. The picture he paints today is one of bearish conviction. That’s exactly the reason he’s come under recent criticism as his ilk of ivory tower economists have started calling an end to this recession.

Though we don’t think he has anything to prove, he released a special report reaffirming his key points. You can read it in full here. But if you don’t have the time to peruse the twenty-two page (slightly wonkish) document, we’ve broken down the basic takeaway for you.

The equity markets have moved too far, too fast, and a correction is coming. Rather than buy into this rally, you should look at commodities. That’s because David believes that since 2001commodities took off on a secular bull market run.

Also, rather than hold US dollars, Rosie bets that the Canadian buck is a safer bet due to Canada’s smaller national debt (26% of GDP vs. 62% in the US), smaller budget deficit (-3.4% of GDP vs. -11.2% in the US), stronger banking sector (no Canadian bank needed a bailout), lower unemployment, and an economy more reliant on commodity exports like lumber, oil, natural gas and precious metals.

But the scariest–for holders of US dollars—forecast Rosie makes is that the US has yet to use a power policy tool: the devaluing of the greenback.

As Obama continues to take pages out of FDR’s playbook, he’s yet to devalue the dollar as FDR did in 1933. Rosenberg doesn’t say that the US policy wizards will directly devalue the dollar. Rather, he thinks it will happen by the expansion of the Fed’s balance sheet and the creation of freshly printed dollars.

We think he’s dead on about this call. The US’s “strong dollar” policy has become the latest oxymoron to enter the American vernacular. There is only one direction the value of the US dollar is going over the long-term—down.

Where exactly should you invest amidst this economic malaise? Here are the seven places to park your cash. Not surprisingly, our favorite precious metal tops the list.

1.) Gold

2.) Commodities

3.) The Canadian dollar

4.) Resource sectors of the stock market

5.) US sectors that have high foreign exposure (materials, tech, staples, healthcare)

6.) Canadian sectors that benefit from lower import costs (consumer stocks) but lose export competitiveness (manufacturers)

7.) Canadian bonds (a higher Canadian dollar will keep inflation low, hence reinforcing positive fixed income returns)

And Warren Buffett came out saying he’s buying equities again. All the while, the dollar is sitting at an 11 month low, and gold touched $1006 this morning.

As I perused the underground, I came across a piece by Jeff Harding of the Daily Capitalist that I had to share. He begins by asking, “how has the playing field for our economy changed and how will those changes affect our future? The answer to these questions will determine the future of the world’s economies.”

He then outlines the 7 mega-trends that will dictate our economic future. We’ve touched upon many of these ideas in previous issues. But here they are:

• Megatrend No.1. The culture of consumption is broken and won’t return to former levels. This is the key to everything.
• Megatrend No.1. The culture of consumption is broken and won’t return to former levels. This is the key to everything.
• Megatrend No. 2. Consumers will continue to increase savings to prepare for retirement.
• Megatrend No. 3. Declining U.S. consumer demand will continue to negatively impact the world economy.
• Megatrend No. 4. Deflation will continue for some time.
• Megatrend No. 5. Home ownership rates will decline to more historical levels of, say, around 66%, down from the high of 69% during the boom, which will keep a lid on home prices.
• Megatrend No. 6. Government stimulus and recovery programs only delay recovery and deepen the pain for workers.
• Megatrend No. 7. Massive federal deficits will double the national debt, result in higher taxes, and will act as a permanent drag on the economy.

If you have a chance, you should check out the piece in full. It is jam packed with facts and figures that will give you something to chew on for breakfast, lunch and dinner.

So where do these trends all lead?

All cycles eventually bottom out and growth resumes. The timing of any recovery is impossible to predict and for the most part it depends on what the government will do (or, hopefully, not do). The more the government interferes with the recovery process by propping up bankrupt banks, by manipulating the economy with fiscal and monetary stimulus, by creating a huge national debt, and by increasing taxes, the longer it will take.

With commercial real estate in serious decline, deflation will continue, and we’ll see more bank failures. While we may see a “bump” in GDP in Q3 and Q4, the liquidation of commercial real estate assets and other debt will accelerate. At some point, deflation will stop, and asset prices will find a bottom, as housing is starting to do now. My view is that the post-deflation economy will remain sluggish with high unemployment for some time. I believe that, unlike Japan, we will eventually see inflation.

There are significant differences between our economy and Japan’s and the comparison to Japan in the 1990s may not be entirely applicable here. The Japanese were reluctant to let banks and companies fail, but, despite a few notable exceptions, we aren’t. This is a necessary requirement for recovery, and we are better at “creative destruction” than are the Japanese.

Also, we have a more dynamic culture of entrepreneurship than Japan, making us more responsive to a recovery. However, the main difference is that Japan’s debt was largely financed internally due to their very high savings rate in the 1990s (about 14%). While our savings rate will continue to grow, I do not believe it will keep up with rising federal deficits, and we will need to finance our national debt on the international markets. This will drive interest rates up and put pressure on the dollar.

Then I believe inflation will assert itself as banks renew the lending cycle. I believe the Fed will maintain its loose monetary policy in order to keep interest rates down to stimulate growth. Governments always find it expedient to create inflation to give people the impression that the economy is growing. The problem is that inflation will depress the formation of real savings necessary to finance growth, and like the 1970s, we’ll see stagnation and inflation (”Stagflation”). If inflation gets out of hand, then, for a while we may see price and wage controls.

After that, who knows? Cut the money supply as Paul Volker did, and drive up interest rates and bring on a new recession? Continue to inflate? That’s too far in the future and politicians don’t think that far ahead.

This issue is entirely in the contrarian spirit of playing devil’s advocate. So put your pitchforks down. Take a deep breath. There is plenty of space to poke holes in (or rant) about our thesis by writing to info@contrarianprofits.com

So here it goes. The four reasons you shouldn’t buy gold today…

Reason 1: Did you know that the seventh largest holder of gold in the world is not a country, but an exchange traded fund? Yes, gold ETF SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has amassed the seventh largest gold reserve in the world. This fund holds more gold than China, Switzerland, Japan, the United Kingdom or the European Central Bank.

So why does this matter? Because should big investors (hedge funds, pension funds) who hold this fund (and many due), decide to dump their shares or are forced to liquidate their holdings because of investor redemptions, who will buy up the excess slack? This excess supply would surely drive the price of gold down making for some unhappy gold bugs.

Reason 2: Gold is overbought at today’s price level. When anything becomes overbought quickly, as gold has in recent months, it has a habit of correcting just as quickly. According to Bob Prechter, CEO of Elliot Wave International, the precious metals are “heavily overbought” and the “path of least resistance” will be to the downside for many months. “[Gold's] going to go much further [down] than people think.”

While gold stocks have recently pushed their 200 and 50 day moving averages higher, which is a bullish indicator, the threat that speculators are leading the way is ever present. And if the current recession takes a double dip, which we think is highly possibly (and so does Nouriel Roubini), investors around the world will flee to the dollar again. When the dollar gets propped up, gold falls. And when it starts to fall, you can bet these speculators will be abandoning ship just as fast as they boarded. This could leave you, dear reader, with a sinking boatload of gold in the middle of the vast and hopeless ocean.

Reason 3: More inflation hedges are available today. In the past, gold served as the best inflation hedge out there. In the 1970s when inflation started taking off, so did gold. People piled into the precious metal at rates never before seen, driving the price up to historic highs.

Fast forward to today, and you have a much different investing environment. Gold’s monopoly as the only inflation hedge is over. Now, investors have a wealth of options such as currency ETFs, TIPS, short US Treasury ETFs, other baskets of commodities, and stock in companies that can raise prices on pace with inflation. While none of these vehicles is the perfect inflation hedge, each attracts money away from gold. And the less demand for gold, the less upward price pressure there will be.

Reason 4: The run up in gold is based on fear, not on increased demand. Right now, owning gold is a “fear trade.” The price of gold is not up because people are buying more jewelry or Indian saris. It’s up because people are scared of hyperinflation taking over, the mountain of debt crushing the US, and the fiat money system collapsing. But what if Chairman Ben, and all his merry henchmen, are actually doing the right thing? While it is hard to say this with a straight face, what if everything returns to normal and we experience a nice V-shaped recovery? Or, more plausibly, what if deflation wins the day? Both these scenarios will have serious downward consequences on the price of gold.

So, dear readers, what do you think? Are any of these scenarios possible? Write to us at info@contrarianprofits.com

Why should you listen to Stiglitz? Because he won the Nobel Prize for proving that the market isn’t always efficient. And here at Notes, we always have time for anyone willing to attack established wisdom.

Stiglitz says the US faces two distinct scenarios. The first is malaise, in which the economy just bounces along the bottom for the next few years. The second scenario is a W shaped recovery marked by another dip as soon as the government’s stimulus funds begin to fade, around 2011.

Stiglitz also believes the dollar is doomed in the long term. This is especially scary because he’s a member of the United Nations commission that will study the global financial system and currency regimes. This from Bloomberg:

“Whether or not they’re able to do it, the uncertainty today about whether they can do it can contribute to the weakness of the dollar,” Stiglitz said. “That’s one of the reasons there is increasing interest around the world in discussing alternatives to the dollar system.”

“In most quarters, there is a feeling we should move away from the dollar system. The question is do we do it in an orderly way, or a chaotic way,” Stiglitz said. “The size of the deficit and the size of the balance sheet of the Fed have just increased the anxiety and the desire that something be done.”

While some think it would hurt the U.S. to no longer be able to borrow cheaply in dollars, “that era is over,” he said. “We’re moving to a more multi-polar world.”

Between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of Lehman Brothers was “the short period of American triumphalism, where we dominated the global scene. That period is over,” Stiglitz said.

We’ve been harping on about the fall of the dollar for some time. A quick glance at this picture (hat tip, Charlesgoyette.com) will show you why.

Nobody can look at this chart and honestly tell us that the Fed is interested in price stability. The only things that stay stable in this country are crooked politicians, taxes and a banking cartel ready to profit at the expense of this once great nation.

According to good old Wikipedia, confirmation bias is “an irrational tendency to search for, interpret or remember information in a way that confirms one’s preconceptions or working hypotheses.” Put simply, it means you look for information that agrees with your own perspective.

In our case, we guess that means ignoring idiots like Paul Krugman, who tells us that we can spend our way out of a depression and the do-gooders in the Obama administration, who tell us that everything will be okay and that we’re about to witness a miraculous V-shape recovery. (Just like when President Hoover told Americans in 1932 that “prosperity was just around the corner.”)

And we guess it means paying attention to those who called this crisis ahead of time… guys like Will’s father, Bill, Porter Stansberry, Peter Schiff, Nouriel Roubini, Marc Faber, Doug Casey, James Dale Davidson and the rest of the “doom and gloomers” the mainstream ridiculed during the boom years.

Do we seek out information that agrees with our perspective? Of course we do!  And we’re not the only ones. Is this healthy behavior? Perhaps not. But the important thing is we’re aware of it... and we sincerely hope you are, too.

See, here at Notes our mission has always been to give you the other side of the economic story. The real danger, in our humble opinion, of succumbing to confirmation bias is to only listen to what the mainstream has to say. Because if you fully swallow what the mainstream has to say you’re going to get killed in the markets.

That doesn’t mean the underground always gets it right. It doesn’t. But it gives you a fighting chance, at least. Don’t forget, at the height of the boom years, you didn’t hear the talking heads on CNBC talking about the coming depression… or the Fed for that matter… or the geniuses in President Bush’s economic team.

To have had any ideas what was coming, you would have had to tune into a very different stream of opinion. You would have had to read Will’s father’s The Daily Reckoning, for instance, where Bill told readers of his “Trade of the Decade” (to sell stocks and buy gold). If you’d done so, you’d be sitting pretty right now.

But it is important to be aware of the tendency for self-confirmation, whatever you’re reading or whoever you’re getting your information from. Here are five things you can do to overcome confirmation bias (hat tip, The Financial Philosopher):

1. You can begin by attempting to give equal time to information sources with which you agree as to those with which you disagree. No mind has ever grown without stretching beyond its comfort zone. Is it not the blunt stone that sharpens the blade?

2. Also beware of the mainstream media because it tends to attach itself to the bias of the herd. Have you noticed a recent shift in the media’s overall sentiment from bearish to bullish? The popular view seems to be shifting toward stating “The Recession Is Over.” This is the same media that said, less than one year ago, that the US Economy was headed for “The Next Great Depression.”

3. When you find yourself overwhelmed with reasons to make a decision to do something, force yourself to come up with reasons why you should not do it (or remember the third alternative – deferring the decision to a later time).

4. Simply be aware of what information you consume. If information were food, would your “diet” be healthy? Is it balanced?

5. Don’t be mentally lazy. Complacency is a breeding ground for other potentially damaging behaviors, such as greed and hubris.

The domino effect is straightforward: Higher deficits spark market concerns over future inflation; concerns of inflation contribute to a weaker dollar; and both come together to undermine the greenback’s role as a reliable store of value around the world. Right now, with so much unused capacity in the American economy and so much unemployment – likely to persist for at least another year or two – the more pressing worry is deflation (a general decrease in prices), not inflation. But as the economy eventually recovers, the possibility of inflation will loom, and with forward-looking markets, worries about the future often play out in the present. Anxieties about future inflation can lead to a weaker dollar today.

Of course, a new global currency won’t happen right away. It will take global policy makers months – maybe even years – to wean the world off the greenback. But Stiglitz says its coming.

Like it or not, out of the ashes of this debacle a new and more stable global reserve system is likely to emerge, and for the world as a whole, as well as for the United States, this would be a good thing. It would lead to a more stable worldwide financial system and stronger global economic growth. The current system entails developing countries putting aside hundreds of billions of dollars a year – only weakening global demand and contributing to our economic difficulties. Also, there is something a little unseemly about poor countries lending the US trillions of dollars, now at an interest rate of close to zero.

Long time Notes readers shouldn’t be surprised that our addiction to credit has lead to the demise of the dollar. And if you’ve read James Dale Davidson’s “The Plague of the Black Debt,” you’re already yardsticks ahead of your fellow citizens. If you haven’t, we strongly urge you to see what this debt pile means to your investments over the next decade.

The death of the dollar is nothing new – the US currency has been terminally ill since the beginning of the last century. The value of the buck has collapsed 196% since its peak in 1900. That’s a pretty significant drop in a just century. This from Sean Malone at the Ludwig von Mises Institute (a great Austrian School of economics and libertarian resource):

Money supply from 1946-2009 has been increased 5938% to $8,235,900,000,000. In that time, the US has seen 10 recession, constant military action, massive expansion of government power, an explosion of the welfare state and the complete annihilation of the buying power of the US dollar.

Now try to imagine what your life might be like if every dollar you had bought you 20 times as much stuff… This is the cost of inflation.