<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Oil Hit $160 a Barrel – Next Week?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/could-oil-hit-160-a-barrel-%e2%80%93-next-week/864/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/could-oil-hit-160-a-barrel-%e2%80%93-next-week/864</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:08:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Software Downloads</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/could-oil-hit-160-a-barrel-%e2%80%93-next-week/864/comment-page-1#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>Software Downloads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/could-oil-hit-160-a-barrel-%e2%80%93-next-week/#comment-397</guid>
		<description>and the oil companies continue to make record profits!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and the oil companies continue to make record profits!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Record For Oil? &#171; Mike Cane 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/could-oil-hit-160-a-barrel-%e2%80%93-next-week/864/comment-page-1#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Record For Oil? &#171; Mike Cane 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/could-oil-hit-160-a-barrel-%e2%80%93-next-week/#comment-396</guid>
		<description>[...] Record For&#160;Oil?   Could Oil Hit $160 a Barrel – Next Week? The oil price could hit $160 a barrel as soon as next week. At least, that’s what ‘Zapata’ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Record For&nbsp;Oil?   Could Oil Hit $160 a Barrel – Next Week? The oil price could hit $160 a barrel as soon as next week. At least, that’s what ‘Zapata’ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Filepromptdotcom</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/could-oil-hit-160-a-barrel-%e2%80%93-next-week/864/comment-page-1#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Filepromptdotcom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 17:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/could-oil-hit-160-a-barrel-%e2%80%93-next-week/#comment-395</guid>
		<description>SO long as the price only grows gradually, we can all adjust.  We all have to get used to more efficient use of the oil, small cars, and not landfilling plastics, and of course using plastics that are recyclable, as some are not.

Its a fact of life that all resources are valuable and shouldn&#039;t be wasted as we have done oil, but with care I think we can be fine for even a couple more generations, but we must research efficiency and electric vehicles, along with alternate power generation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SO long as the price only grows gradually, we can all adjust.  We all have to get used to more efficient use of the oil, small cars, and not landfilling plastics, and of course using plastics that are recyclable, as some are not.</p>
<p>Its a fact of life that all resources are valuable and shouldn&#8217;t be wasted as we have done oil, but with care I think we can be fine for even a couple more generations, but we must research efficiency and electric vehicles, along with alternate power generation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.187 seconds -->
