Don’t Count on the Fed to Save Your Favorite Stocks in 2008
Apr 19th, 2008 | By Eric Roseman | Category: Stock Market InvestingThe Dow and most foreign stock-markets enjoyed a blistering rally on Wednesday but heading into yesterday morning’s trade the futures look pretty ugly.
Earnings from Merrill Lynch, Motorola and Pfizer all point to poor results and the markets are heading lower in the United States and Europe. No surprise for this bear…
Stocks can still muster a significant bear-market rally. The S&P 500 Index and the MSCI World Index have logged almost six consecutive monthly losses. In previous bear markets, including the 2000 to 2002 period, equities did manage to post some big rallies. Of course, these intermediate or short-term advances were just opportunities to sell stocks as markets eventually broke down to newer lows.
What’s amazing about the last bear market is that stocks continued to plunge even as the Federal Reserve aggressively cut lending rates. Turn the calendar ahead six years and we’re pretty much in the same pickle.
The bulls point to the Fed as our stock-market savior. I’m not so sure. Yes, it’s hard or even futile to “Fight the Fed” when the central bank is printing like mad and desperately trying to reflate the money-supply. But investors tend to forget that despite the Fed’s best efforts starting in January 2001, Greenspan and his boys unsuccessfully halted a massive slide in stock values. From January 2001 until December 2002, the Fed cut rates from 5.50% to 1.25%, yet the S&P 500 Index still plunged a cumulative 36%.
Since the Bernanke Fed began cutting rates last September, the S&P 500 Index has declined a cumulative 10% - not exactly a successful rescue.
I still think this market will form a bottom sometime in the fourth quarter - not before. But even then, I don’t expect a bull market to return because the contraction of credit has fractured the economy, corporate earnings and the consumer. It’s hard to be bullish on the market for an extended period especially when oil is trading north of US$100 per barrel.
Last summer, I predicted stocks would still finish higher 12 months later. I was too optimistic. The depth of this crisis is enormous and although we’re probably two-thirds of the way through the worst of this debacle, its implications for the economy will linger for many years.
Bank stocks will ultimately lead the next rally because they represent about 35% of total global stock-market capitalization. It’s pretty likely that as stocks form a bottom later this year the market will enjoy a blistering 12-month gain.
Don’t mistake a rally for a new bull market. No matter what happens in the short-term, most stocks will be poor investments over the next several years as inflation, deflation and a long-term contraction in bank credit slow the world’s largest economy to pre-1995 levels.
ERIC ROSEMAN, Investment Director
P.S. In the upcoming May edition of The Sovereign Individual, I’ll give you an entire “anti-crisis portfolio” packed with seven different ways to protect your holdings from the Fed’s latest “rescue.” Click here to sign up for a risk-free subscription so you don’t miss out.
Advertisement
My Friends Laughed When I Decided To Become a "Big Game Hunter"… But Look Who's Laughing Now!
My friends gossiped. My wife thought I was crazy. They all thought I was nuts.
Now, I'm the ONE laughing all the way to the bank.
Thanks to an ingenious strategy, what one man calls the "Predictability Theory"…first founded and advanced by Harvard and MIT Economists…later perfected (and adapted) by Jack Crooks (and his son J.R.) to the world of "exotic" investments - I've had the ability to collect $232,500 in just 71 days.
Are you a "Big Game Hunter?" Are you interested in 1,000% gains?
Read on to determine is this opportunity is right for you.
Eric serves as an editor and Investment Director for The Sovereign Society's Commodity Trend Alert. Eric's talents include blending a dozen or more alternative investment funds to produce consistent returns to traditional asset classes and making commodity based recommendations with huge upside and limited downside.
