<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Investing in the Biotech Sector: 5 Elements To Consider</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investing-in-the-biotech-sector-5-elements-to-consider/15403/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investing-in-the-biotech-sector-5-elements-to-consider/15403</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 05:09:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investing-in-the-biotech-sector-5-elements-to-consider/15403/comment-page-1#comment-26343</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=15403#comment-26343</guid>
		<description>You know, it doesn&#039;t take a background in biotechnology to read a 
study.  I would recommend taking a look at the actual results of the 
test.  What they show is that a drug with basically zero statistically 
significant side effects causing a basically unaided 5% drop in body 
weight for half of the subjects.  That fact in itself is pretty 
amazing, and is definitely unparalleled in the results of the drug&#039;s 
competitors. 
 
The only serious contender for a weight-loss drug is Qnexa, which 
showed an eye-popping 7% spread over the control group in it&#039;s most 
recent data set.  But it also showed side effects that are likely to 
induce patients to discontinue use and to cause some concern among 
physicians in prescribing it.  Parathesia (which is your skin going 
numb and prickly for an extended period of time), dry mouth and 
altered taste were reported at 20%, 18% and 15%, repectively (placebo 
3%, 0%, 0%).  So there are obvious, dramatic, uncomfortable side 
effects.  What is bizarre to me about the recent market movement is 
that this drug, which is not a new drug, but an amalgam of two already 
available drugs (an amphetamine and an anticonvulsant) shows 
worryingly high incidence of subjectively serious side effects, has 
been assumed to be the stronger market candidate.  Given the public 
perception of diet drugs, and the serious health risks involved in 
giving a chemical speedball to overweight people and then telling them 
to exercise on a nutrient restricted diet, I would stake the house on 
the fact that when push comes to shove, neither doctors nor the 
general public is going to give a very warm reception to Qnexa, 
despite the impressive weight loss attached to treatment therewith. 
 
Lorcaserin on the other hand, as mentioned above, just came back with 
essentially zero side effects.  The only side effect which exceeded a 
2% difference with the side-effects reported by the placebo group was 
a 7% difference in patients reporting headache.  The rest of the 
reported side-effects were either less than 2% separation or actually 
had the placebo group reporting in high percentages than the 
experimental group. 
 
Additionally, there is the issue of subject mortality within the 
control group: 
&quot;The Week 52 completion rate was higher for patients on lorcaserin 
(55.4%) compared to those on placebo (45.1%). The difference is 
primarily attributed to higher discontinuation rates for &quot;Subject 
Decision&quot; (19.2% lorcaserin vs. 27.7% placebo), which includes &quot;Lack 
of Efficacy&quot; (1.7% lorcaserin vs. 5.5% placebo).&quot; 
 
For those of you who haven&#039;t taken intro Stats classes, what this says 
is that the people in the control group dropped out of the study at 
WAY higher rate than those in the experimental (lorcaserin) group. 
&quot;Subject Decision&quot; means that they dropped out because they wanted to 
and &quot;Lack of Efficacy&quot; means they dropped out because they weren&#039;t 
losing weight.  Essentially what this means is that significantly more 
people in the experimental group WERE NOT SEEING RESULTS, and 
accordingly dropped out.  Thus, the very people who were not losing 
weight, whose lack of results were the result of being given the 
placebo rather than the actual drug, had their data (the lack of 
weight loss) excluded from the results of the study.  The effect of 
this differential &quot;subject mortality&quot; was undoubtedly to make the 
placebo group weight loss higher - TO DECREASE THE STATISTICAL 
SEPARATION IN REPORTED WEIGHT LOSS BETWEEN THE LORCASERIN AND CONTROL 
GROUPS. 
 
So to all of you out there shorting, or just reading the headlines off 
whatever garbage &quot;analyst&quot; site that gets linked to the Google Finance 
page, do your research, don&#039;t just read headlines.  Arena has a solid 
drug even with the data, because it showed itself to be effective 
(47.5% lost 5% and 22.6% lost 10% on the drug compared with 20.3% and 
7% on the placebo, even with the above problems with the data) WITHOUT 
SIDE EFFECTS. 
 
Because of the &quot;First, do no harm&quot; sympathies of the Doctors who will 
be doing the prescribing - you&#039;re gonna see this risk-free drug 
explode where a drug with an array of known and potentially serious 
side effects will not. 
 
For more information 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arna.client.shareholder.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=373684&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://arna.client.shareholder.com/releasedetail....&lt;/a&gt; 
(these are the lorcaserin results) 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://ir.vivus.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=353965&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://ir.vivus.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=3...&lt;/a&gt; (these are the 
Vivus/Qnexa results, you&#039;ll notice how brief they are) 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topiramate&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topiramate&lt;/a&gt; (this is one of the two drugs 
in the Qnexa compound) 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phentermine&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phentermine&lt;/a&gt; (this is the other) 
 
There is significant data on the health effects of the Qnexa drugs, 
because they&#039;ve been around for a long time.  Check it out and then re- 
read the Qnexa study.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, it doesn&#039;t take a background in biotechnology to read a<br />
study.  I would recommend taking a look at the actual results of the<br />
test.  What they show is that a drug with basically zero statistically<br />
significant side effects causing a basically unaided 5% drop in body<br />
weight for half of the subjects.  That fact in itself is pretty<br />
amazing, and is definitely unparalleled in the results of the drug&#039;s<br />
competitors. </p>
<p>The only serious contender for a weight-loss drug is Qnexa, which<br />
showed an eye-popping 7% spread over the control group in it&#039;s most<br />
recent data set.  But it also showed side effects that are likely to<br />
induce patients to discontinue use and to cause some concern among<br />
physicians in prescribing it.  Parathesia (which is your skin going<br />
numb and prickly for an extended period of time), dry mouth and<br />
altered taste were reported at 20%, 18% and 15%, repectively (placebo<br />
3%, 0%, 0%).  So there are obvious, dramatic, uncomfortable side<br />
effects.  What is bizarre to me about the recent market movement is<br />
that this drug, which is not a new drug, but an amalgam of two already<br />
available drugs (an amphetamine and an anticonvulsant) shows<br />
worryingly high incidence of subjectively serious side effects, has<br />
been assumed to be the stronger market candidate.  Given the public<br />
perception of diet drugs, and the serious health risks involved in<br />
giving a chemical speedball to overweight people and then telling them<br />
to exercise on a nutrient restricted diet, I would stake the house on<br />
the fact that when push comes to shove, neither doctors nor the<br />
general public is going to give a very warm reception to Qnexa,<br />
despite the impressive weight loss attached to treatment therewith. </p>
<p>Lorcaserin on the other hand, as mentioned above, just came back with<br />
essentially zero side effects.  The only side effect which exceeded a<br />
2% difference with the side-effects reported by the placebo group was<br />
a 7% difference in patients reporting headache.  The rest of the<br />
reported side-effects were either less than 2% separation or actually<br />
had the placebo group reporting in high percentages than the<br />
experimental group. </p>
<p>Additionally, there is the issue of subject mortality within the<br />
control group:<br />
&quot;The Week 52 completion rate was higher for patients on lorcaserin<br />
(55.4%) compared to those on placebo (45.1%). The difference is<br />
primarily attributed to higher discontinuation rates for &quot;Subject<br />
Decision&quot; (19.2% lorcaserin vs. 27.7% placebo), which includes &quot;Lack<br />
of Efficacy&quot; (1.7% lorcaserin vs. 5.5% placebo).&quot; </p>
<p>For those of you who haven&#039;t taken intro Stats classes, what this says<br />
is that the people in the control group dropped out of the study at<br />
WAY higher rate than those in the experimental (lorcaserin) group.<br />
&quot;Subject Decision&quot; means that they dropped out because they wanted to<br />
and &quot;Lack of Efficacy&quot; means they dropped out because they weren&#039;t<br />
losing weight.  Essentially what this means is that significantly more<br />
people in the experimental group WERE NOT SEEING RESULTS, and<br />
accordingly dropped out.  Thus, the very people who were not losing<br />
weight, whose lack of results were the result of being given the<br />
placebo rather than the actual drug, had their data (the lack of<br />
weight loss) excluded from the results of the study.  The effect of<br />
this differential &quot;subject mortality&quot; was undoubtedly to make the<br />
placebo group weight loss higher &#8211; TO DECREASE THE STATISTICAL<br />
SEPARATION IN REPORTED WEIGHT LOSS BETWEEN THE LORCASERIN AND CONTROL<br />
GROUPS. </p>
<p>So to all of you out there shorting, or just reading the headlines off<br />
whatever garbage &quot;analyst&quot; site that gets linked to the Google Finance<br />
page, do your research, don&#039;t just read headlines.  Arena has a solid<br />
drug even with the data, because it showed itself to be effective<br />
(47.5% lost 5% and 22.6% lost 10% on the drug compared with 20.3% and<br />
7% on the placebo, even with the above problems with the data) WITHOUT<br />
SIDE EFFECTS. </p>
<p>Because of the &quot;First, do no harm&quot; sympathies of the Doctors who will<br />
be doing the prescribing &#8211; you&#039;re gonna see this risk-free drug<br />
explode where a drug with an array of known and potentially serious<br />
side effects will not. </p>
<p>For more information </p>
<p><a href="http://arna.client.shareholder.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=373684" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://arna.client.shareholder.com/releasedetail..." rel="nofollow">http://arna.client.shareholder.com/releasedetail&#8230;</a>.<br />
(these are the lorcaserin results)<br />
<a href="http://ir.vivus.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=353965" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://ir.vivus.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=3.." rel="nofollow">http://ir.vivus.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=3..</a>. (these are the<br />
Vivus/Qnexa results, you&#039;ll notice how brief they are)<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topiramate" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topiramate</a> (this is one of the two drugs<br />
in the Qnexa compound)<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phentermine" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phentermine</a> (this is the other) </p>
<p>There is significant data on the health effects of the Qnexa drugs,<br />
because they&#039;ve been around for a long time.  Check it out and then re-<br />
read the Qnexa study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.162 seconds -->

