Second Thoughts On, Corn-Based, Ethanol

By Dave Gonigam

Related Articles

Lost in the meaningless bickering among the presidential candidates over suspending the federal gasoline tax is some genuine news…

Rising food prices are prompting second thoughts about corn-based ethanol — even from the candidate representing the home state of Archer Daniels Midland:

Democrat Barack Obama said Sunday the federal government might need to rethink its support for corn ethanol because of rising food prices, a stance similar to Republican John McCain’s but at odds with farm states considered important to the November election.

“What I’ve said is my top priority is making sure people are able to get enough to eat. If it turns out we need to make changes in our ethanol policy to help people get something to eat, that has got to be the step we take,”said Obama, D-Ill., on NBC’s “Meet the Press”.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., speaking on ABC’s “This Week,” agreed the issue needs closer review.

“What we need to do is accelerate the research into farm waste and into other cellulosic plant materials…”

Kevin Kerr of Resource Trader Alert figures the political tide will turn decisively against corn-based ethanol by next year, with the departed George W. Bush taking the rap for the food fallout.

Still, if the ethanol lobby is destined to lose its sway, the sugar lobby is another matter.
The ethanol giants of southeastern Brazil have transformed how 185 million residents of this South American nation power their cars and trucks. Now, they say they’re ready to start the same ethanol revolution in the rest of the world, if only the world will let them.

That, however, is where Brazil’s ethanol leaders are hitting problems. They already churn out what many consider to be the world’s cheapest and most efficient mass-produced biofuel and say they can export billions of gallons more.

Yet the rest of the world doesn’t seem to want what the Brazilians have. In the United States, a 54 cent-per-gallon tax blocks most Brazilian ethanol from reaching U.S. consumers.

And that’s a function of U.S. sugar growers who also manage to keep much imported sugar from reaching U.S. shores — forcing Americans to pay at least twice as much for sugar as the rest of the world (and wrecking the ecology of the Everglades, to boot).

Liked this article from The Daily Reckoning? You can receive the same great commentary and insights directly to your email box when you claim your free subscription to the The Daily Reckoning eletter service. Simply fill in your email address below and hit 'subscribe'.

Subscribe

NO-SPAM PLEDGE: We will NEVER rent, sell, or give away your e-mail address to anyone for any reason. You can unsubscribe from The Daily Reckoning with a few clicks.

Related Articles

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

About the Author

Dave Gonigam is a contributor to Whiskey & Gunpowder, Daily Reckoning and Desidooru Saloon.

See All Posts by This Author



The Daily Reckoning offers a "uniquely refreshing" perspective on the global economy, investing and the ability to live well in uncertain times. You will learn what you can expect from today's markets and how to prosper in the face of uncertainty.

See All Posts from This Publication

Post a Response



Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Receive These Valuable Investing Strategy Resources to Your Inbox Courtesy of Contrarian Profits

    Subscribe
We respect your privacy.
Choose any of the FREE subscription services below that you'd like to receive, enter your email address, and click 'subscribe'.
Contrarian Profits

The Daily Reckoning



Select Edition:
Penny Sleuth

Money Morning

Investor's Daily Edge

Money Morning UK

Investment U

Whiskey and Gunpowder

Taipan Daily

Offshore A-Letter

Today's Financial News

International Living

The Smart Profits Report

Spiritual Wealth