<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; American Taxpayers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/american-taxpayers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Federal Reserve, Bank of China Cut Interest Rates as Financial Crisis Deepens</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/federal-reserve-bank-of-china-cut-interest-rates-as-financial-crisis-deepens/7457</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/federal-reserve-bank-of-china-cut-interest-rates-as-financial-crisis-deepens/7457#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Simpkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Taxpayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Expenditures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Funds Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve Policymakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Simpkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Turmoil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NABZY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebate Checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Rebates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weak Dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=7457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Federal Reserve policymakers yesterday (Wednesday) reduced the benchmark Federal Funds rate to 1.0%, an aggressive half-percentage-point cut that central bank Chairman Ben S. Bernanke’s latest attempt to keep the widening financial crisis from tipping the world into a global recession.</p>
<p>“The pace of economic activity appears to have slowed markedly, owing importantly to a decline in consumer expenditures,” the Fed said in a statement. “Business equipment spending and industrial production have weakened in recent months, and slowing economic activity in many foreign economies is damping the prospects for U.S. exports.</p>
<p>“Moreover,” the statement added, “the intensification of financial market turmoil is likely to exert additional restraint on spending, partly by further reducing the ability of households and businesses to obtain credit.”</p>
<p>The Fed&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federal Reserve policymakers yesterday (Wednesday) reduced the benchmark Federal Funds rate to 1.0%, an aggressive half-percentage-point cut that central bank Chairman Ben S. Bernanke’s latest attempt to keep the widening financial crisis from tipping the world into a global recession.<span id="more-7457"></span></p>
<p>“The pace of economic activity appears to have slowed markedly, owing importantly to a decline in consumer expenditures,” the Fed said in a statement. “Business equipment spending and industrial production have weakened in recent months, and slowing economic activity in many foreign economies is damping the prospects for U.S. exports.</p>
<p>“Moreover,” the statement added, “the intensification of financial market turmoil is likely to exert additional restraint on spending, partly by further reducing the ability of households and businesses to obtain credit.”</p>
<p>The Fed also lowered its discount rate – the rate at which it lends directly to banks and Wall Street firms – by a half-percentage point to 1.25%.</p>
<p>A wave of failures among banks and financial institutions have stymied lending and roiled global credit markets. The world economy faces a significant uphill battle as a result.</p>
<p>The U.S. economy expanded by 2.8% in the second quarter, but that expansion was largely the product of government stimulus checks and a weak dollar. The federal government returned roughly $168 billion back to American taxpayers in the form of rebate checks earlier this year. The tax rebates, which were mailed through May, kept U.S. consumers afloat, while a weak dollar accelerated a torrent of exports out of the country.</p>
<p>Since then, consumer spending has been undermined by rising unemployment and the dollar has strengthened substantially.  The advance estimate for third quarter gross domestic product (GDP) is to be released today (Thursday), and most analysts anticipate the U.S. economy shrunk during the three months ended Sept. 30.</p>
<p>“The growing reality is that this is not just a slowdown, but a true recession,” Joel Naroff, president and chief economist of Naroff Economic Advisors said in an interview with <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links" onclick="return alinks_click(this);" title=""  style="padding-right: 13px; background: url(http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-content/plugins/alinks/images/external.png) center right no-repeat;" rel="external">Money Morning</a>.</p>
<p>“U.S. GDP contracted significantly in the third quarter,” said Naroff, who believes the economy may have contracted by 2.5% to 3.0% in the quarter. “Such a sharp slowdown is not expected.”</p>
<p>Citigroup Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AC">C</a>) analysts Geoffrey Dennis and Jason Press said last week that they now expect an entire year of contraction before the economy gets back on track in the second half of 2009.</p>
<p>“We are now expecting one of the sharpest recessions in the post-war period,” Dennis and Press wrote in a report to clients on Oct. 21.</p>
<p>The Fed statement said the rate cut “should help over time to improve credit conditions and promote a return to moderate economic growth,” but noted “downside risks to growth remain.”</p>
<p>This is the ninth time that the central bank has lowered rates since September 2007. The Fed has also loaned hundreds of billions of dollars to banks through a new lending program and earlier this week began loaning money directly to major businesses by purchasing commercial paper.</p>
<p>The Fed yesterday lowered the interest rates it will charge to buy unsecured commercial paper to 1.84%, down from 1.89% on Tuesday. It lowered the interest rate on asset-backed commercial paper to 3.84% yesterday, down from 3.89% the day prior.</p>
<p>The central bank created its program to buy 90-day commercial paper directly from issuers on Oct. 7, meaning it’s now three weeks old.</p>
<p>The Fed’s new loan programs have expanded assets on its balance sheet by 104% during the past year to $1.804 trillion, or 12.6% of GDP, Bloomberg reported.<br />
Rate Reductions Around the World</p>
<p>While the Federal Reserve struggles to keep the U.S. economy from sinking into a second Great Depression, central banks in Europe and Asia are also on the defensive and could soon join the Fed in slashing rates – if they haven’t already.</p>
<p>The British Office for National Statistics last week said that, after a flat second quarter, the U.K. economy contracted 0.5% in the three months ended Sept. 30. It’s likely that Germany, France and Italy have already entered into a recession, as their second-quarter GDP fell 0.5%, 0.3% and 0.3%, respectively.</p>
<p>The International Monetary Fund (IMF) said last week that the economy of the 15-country Eurozone would grind to a virtual standstill in 2009.</p>
<p>The European Central Bank (ECB), which raised rates as recently as July, backtracked and cut its benchmark rate by half a point on Oct. 8, dropping it down to 3.75%. ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet said Monday that the central bank’s Governing Council could take additional steps at its next meeting, currently scheduled for Nov. 6.</p>
<p>“I consider it possible that the Governing Council would decrease interest rates once again at its next meeting,” ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet said yesterday. “Taking into account the recent substantial decline in commodity prices together with a substantial weakening in demand which has emerged lately, upside risks to price stability have diminished.”</p>
<p>Nick Parsons, head of markets strategy at nabCapital (OTC: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NABZY">NABZY</a>) in London, told The Guardian that the Bank of England (BOE) could also follow the Fed’s move with a one-point cut of its own. That would leave the BOE’s rate at 4.5%</p>
<p>China, on the other hand, wasted no time in following the lead of the U.S. Fed. The People’s Bank of China cut its interest rates yesterday, reducing its key one-year lending rate from 6.93% down to 6.66%.  The rate cut was the central bank’s third reduction in two months.</p>
<p>China’s economy registered a solid GDP expansion of 9% in the third quarter – a noticeable step down from the 11.9% pace set in 2007.  Beijing is clearly worried about the effects a global recession would have on its economy and wants to ensure growth does not slow any further.</p>
<p>Of course, lowering rates will also help keep the Chinese currency, the yuan, from appreciating against the dollar and the euro as central banks in the West pull out all the stops in dealing with the credit crisis.</p>
<p>“This cut was driven by the slowdown in the third quarter and the likelihood that the U.S. and other central banks will cut rates,” Xing Ziqiang, an economist at China International Capital Corp. in Beijing, told Bloomberg.</p>
<p>GDP growth in China has slowed for the past five quarters but so long as the nation keeps inflation in check it should be able to maintain a “reasonable” economic expansion of at least 8% next year, said Liu Erh-fei, managing director and chairman for China at Merrill Lynch &amp; Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=MER">MER</a>).</p>
<p>Whether Chinese banks were “wise, lucky, or better regulated,” they avoided exposure to the risky subprime mortgages and derivative products that caused the current financial firestorm,” said Liu. “There is no systemic risk in China’s banks that could spill over into a full blown financial crisis.”</p>
<p>China has more than enough economic weapons at its disposal to ensure strong growth going forward, including a world-leading $1.9 trillion in foreign currency reserves. China also has a budget surplus of 2% of GDP, according to Stephen Green, of Standard Chartered PLC. And public sector debt is just 16% of GDP.</p>
<p>Earlier this year, Beijing shifted the focus of its policy to growth rather than inflation – a choice analysts say is now paying dividends.</p>
<p>Inflation in China, and worldwide, is beginning to ease alongside commodities prices. Inflation in China receded to 4.9% in the year to August, from 8.7% in February. And Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=GS">GS</a>) forecasts that it will fall as low as 1.5% in 2009.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/30/fed-rate-cut/">Source: Federal Reserve, Bank of China Cut Interest Rates as Financial Crisis Deepens</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/federal-reserve-bank-of-china-cut-interest-rates-as-financial-crisis-deepens/7457/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fed to Cut Rates, U.S. Recession Appears Likely</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/fed-to-cut-rates-us-recession-appears-likely/7275</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/fed-to-cut-rates-us-recession-appears-likely/7275#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Simpkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Taxpayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Funds Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Simpkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NABZY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebate Checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Rebates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Jobless Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weak Dollar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=7275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Federal Reserve is likely to cut rates tomorrow (Wednesday), possibly in conjunction with central bank counterparts in Europe, as fears of a global recession have intensified. However, the Fed has little room to maneuver as its benchmark Federal Funds rate is already at 2% and analysts remain skeptical that reducing it any further keep the United States from sliding into a prolonged recession.</p>
<p>The next meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee is scheduled for tomorrow Wednesday Oct. 29. There is no doubt that growth will be the central issue of the committee’s discussion, as fears of a global recession are intensifying alongside deteriorating economic data.</p>
<p>The British Office for National Statistics’ said Friday that, after a flat second quarter,&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Federal Reserve is likely to cut rates tomorrow (Wednesday), possibly in conjunction with central bank counterparts in Europe, as fears of a global recession have intensified. However, the Fed has little room to maneuver as its benchmark Federal Funds rate is already at 2% and analysts remain skeptical that reducing it any further keep the United States from sliding into a prolonged recession.<span id="more-7275"></span></p>
<p>The next meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee is scheduled for tomorrow Wednesday Oct. 29. There is no doubt that growth will be the central issue of the committee’s discussion, as fears of a global recession are intensifying alongside deteriorating economic data.</p>
<p>The British Office for National Statistics’ said Friday that, after a flat second quarter, U.K. gross domestic product (GDP) contracted 0.5% in the three months ended Sept. 30. There’s little doubt that other European nations have already succumbed to recession, and <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/07/iceland-economy/" target="_blank">the near  bankruptcy of Iceland</a> has highlighted the interdependency of the world’s  financial system.</p>
<p>It’s likely that Germany, France and Italy have already entered into a recession, as their second-quarter GDP fell 0.5%, 0.3% and 0.3%, respectively. Japan – the world’s second largest economy – is also dangerously close to recession, with its economy having contracted 2.4% in the three months ended June 30.</p>
<p>The International Monetary Fund (IMF) said last week that the economy of the 15-country Eurozone would grind to a virtual standstill in 2009. And the prognostications for the United States are equally bad, if not worse.</p>
<p>The U.S. economy expanded by 2.8% in the second quarter, but  that expansion was <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/07/31/gdp/" target="_blank">largely  the product of government stimulus checks and a weak dollar</a>. The federal government returned roughly $168 billion back to American taxpayers in the form of rebate checks earlier this year.  The tax rebates, which were mailed through May, kept U.S. consumers afloat, while a weak dollar accelerated a torrent of exports out of the country.</p>
<p>Since then, consumer spending has been undermined by rising  unemployment and the dollar has strengthened substantially.</p>
<p>The unemployment rate hit a five-year high of 6.1% in September and jobless claims have continued to mount this month, with a seasonally adjusted 478,000 Americans filing for first-time unemployment benefits in the week ended Oct. 18. Initial jobless claims have soared 47% in the past year and continuing claims are up 44%.</p>
<p>Meanwhile the greenback has posted a strong rebound over the past month, making U.S. goods more expensive to foreign nations, and thereby weakening exports.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=USDEUR" target="_blank">dollar</a> climbed 5.9% against the euro last week and yesterday (Monday) surged to a two year high of $1.2462 versus the European currency.</p>
<p>The economy has nothing left to lean on at this point, and that fact has most economists projecting a debilitating recession for the United States.</p>
<p>“We are now expecting one of the sharpest recessions in the  post-war period,” Citigroup Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=c" target="_blank">C</a>) analysts Geoffrey Dennis and Jason Press wrote in a report to clients on Oct. 21. Citi sees an entire year of contraction before the economy gets back on track in the second half of 2009. Dennis and Press predict U.S. unemployment could climb as high as 8.5% next year.</p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/27/global-recession/" target="_blank">The growing  reality is that this is not just a slowdown, but a true recession</a>,” Joel  Naroff, president and chief economist of <a href="http://www.naroffeconomics.com/" target="_blank">Naroff Economic Advisors</a> said in an interview with <em><strong><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links" onclick="return alinks_click(this);" title=""  style="padding-right: 13px; background: url(http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-content/plugins/alinks/images/external.png) center right no-repeat;" rel="external">Money Morning</a></strong></em>.</p>
<p>“U.S. GDP contracted significantly in the third quarter,” said Naroff, who believes GDP may have contracted as much as 2.5% &#8211; 3.0% in the quarter. “Such a sharp slowdown is not expected.”</p>
<p>So far, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke has turned to his ever-expanding arsenal of liquidity measures in an attempt to thwart what now seems to be an unavoidable recession. However, he may eventually be forced to cut interest rates all the way to zero like the Bank of Japan did in 1999.</p>
<p>But first the Fed will reduce its benchmark Federal Funds  target rate tomorrow by 25-50 basis points.</p>
<p>&#8220;<a href="http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5g21fcGjS4CESuXBKqZ0LXVdXkHew" target="_blank">The cut  is already in the market</a>,&#8221; John Ryding, economist at RDQ Economics  told <strong><em>AFP</em></strong>.<br />
“The question is whether it’s 25 or 50 basis points.&#8221;</p>
<p>The latter would mean reducing the key rate from where it currently stands at 1.5% to just 1%. Cutting below 1% could be seen as a sign of panic, according to some analysts.</p>
<p>Earlier this month, the Fed conducted a joint rate cut with a number of its global partners, and other central banks around the world could again join the United States in reducing rates.</p>
<p>The European Central Bank (ECB) could cut its rates as soon as next week at the next meeting of the central bank’s Governing Council scheduled for Nov. 6.</p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=azcLXzBlhXDY&amp;refer=home" target="_blank">I  consider it possible that the Governing Council would decrease interest rates</a> once again at its next meeting,” ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet said yesterday. “Taking into account the recent substantial decline in commodity prices together with a substantial weakening in demand which has emerged lately, upside risks to price stability have diminished.”</p>
<p>Nick Parsons, head of markets strategy at nabCapital (OTC: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=OTC:NABZY" target="_blank">NABZY</a>) in London, told <strong><em>The Guardian</em></strong>, that the Bank of England (BOE) could also follow the Fed’s move with a one-point cut of its own. That would leave the BOE’s rate at 4.5%</p>
<p>The ECB, which raised rates as recently as July, cut its  benchmark by half a point on Oct. 8 to 3.75%.</p>
<h3>The Fed’s Broadening Balance Sheet</h3>
<p>Cutting rates would certainly fit into Chairman Bernanke’s tactic of flooding the market with liquidity – a tactic that began last August and has broadened over the past year to include more and more tools at the Fed’s disposal. As a result, the role of the U.S. Federal Reserve as an institution has completely changed.</p>
<p>After previous rate cuts and cash injections failed to unfreeze credit markets, Bernanke got the green light to start buying up troubled assets and taking equity stakes in financial institutions.</p>
<p>Up until a year ago, the vast majority of the Federal  Reserve’s holdings were in <strong>Treasury</strong><strong> </strong>securities. However, over the past several months, Bernanke has expanded the role of the Fed to include the programs ranging from the Fannie Mae (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=fnm" target="_blank">FNM</a>) and Freddie Mac (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=fre" target="_blank">FRE</a>) bailout, to becoming a  buyer of last resort for undesirable assets.</p>
<p>In fact, the Fed set the interest rates it will charge for  its purchases of commercial paper from banks and companies. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSNYE00042720081027" target="_blank">The Fed  said it would charge 1.88% for unsecured commercial paper and 3.88% for asset-backed  commercial paper</a>, <strong><em>Reuters</em></strong> reported.</p>
<p>The Fed created its program to buy 90-day commercial paper  directly from issuers three weeks ago, on Oct. 7.</p>
<p>“The net effect of these facilities has been a truly  staggering pace of growth in the Fed’s balance sheet,” said <strong>Jan Hatzius, </strong>chief U.S. economist  for Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:GS" target="_blank">GS</a>).</p>
<p>The Federal Reserves balance sheet has more than doubled as a result, and it’s showing no signs of abating. As of Oct. 15, the Fed’s balance sheet had <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2008/10/22/feds-balance-sheet-keeps-growing-and-growing/?mod=googlenews_wsj" target="_blank">ballooned  to $1.754 trillion from around $850 billion last year</a>, according to <strong><em>The  Wall Street Journal</em></strong>.</p>
<p>“In coming months, further rapid growth in the Fed’s balance sheet is  likely,” said <strong>Hatzius</strong>.  Hatzius also pointed out that during the Japanese credit crisis of the 1990s,  the <strong>Bank of Japan</strong>’s balance sheet hit 30% of GDP, compared to the United States where the Fed’s balance sheet is currently at about 12% of GDP.</p>
<p>“To be sure, part of this increase occurred in an environment of outright quantitative easing by the Bank of Japan, which is not our current forecast for the Federal Reserve,” he said. “Nevertheless, the Japanese experience illustrates that central balance sheets can grow to very large numbers when the monetary authority is called upon to take over short-term financing for a large part of the economy.”</p>
<p>Japan suffered a decade of stagnation in the 1990s after its property and  stock market bubbles burst. <strong><em>Money Morning</em></strong> Executive Editor Bill  Patalon has written extensively about the <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/07/17/the-lost-decade/" target="_blank">eerie  similarities between that collapse and the potential lost decade that could be  faced in the United States</a>.</p>
<p>The H.4.1 report – the Federal Reserve’s weekly report on changes to its balance sheet, set for release Thursday – will reveal how much capital was withdrawn from the Fed’s new commercial paper facility in the first three days of this week.</p>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/28/fomc-meeting/">Fed to Cut Rates at Next FOMC Meeting as U.S. Recession  Appears Likely</a></p>
<p><a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/28/fomc-meeting/"><br />
</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/fed-to-cut-rates-us-recession-appears-likely/7275/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kiss Your Gas Goodbye</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/kiss-your-gas-goodbye/3032</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/kiss-your-gas-goodbye/3032#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Carpenter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Taxpayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brokerages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gop Senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margin Accounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Company Executives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Futures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wiretaps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/kiss-your-gas-goodbye/3032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">A week that saw the war on taxpayers expand onto to several new fronts also saw US Senate Republicans win a pitched procedural battle to keep gas at the pump grossly inflated.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The US’s minority party routed American taxpayers Tuesday when it mopped the floor with citizen-related issues by blocking a vote that would have:</font></p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Killed corporate oil’s $17 billion tax break.</font></li>
<li><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Taxed excessive corporate oil profits, unless big oil poured the excess into exploring alternative energies.</font></li>
<li><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Forced oil futures speculators from big investment banks, hedge funds and brokerages to have a lot more than 5% cash in the margin accounts they use to bet on oil. Such a move would have dramatically cooled speculation, which even oil company executives admit makes a barrel&#8230;</font></li></ul></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">A week that saw the war on taxpayers expand onto to several new fronts also saw US Senate Republicans win a pitched procedural battle to keep gas at the pump grossly inflated.</font><span id="more-3032"></span></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The US’s minority party routed American taxpayers Tuesday when it mopped the floor with citizen-related issues by blocking a vote that would have:</font></p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Killed corporate oil’s $17 billion tax break.</font></li>
<li><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Taxed excessive corporate oil profits, unless big oil poured the excess into exploring alternative energies.</font></li>
<li><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Forced oil futures speculators from big investment banks, hedge funds and brokerages to have a lot more than 5% cash in the margin accounts they use to bet on oil. Such a move would have dramatically cooled speculation, which even oil company executives admit makes a barrel of oil (today) $70 to $80 too much. </font></li>
<li><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Made it a federal crime to price gouge oil and gas.</font></li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">On the first two issues, Republicans ignored the minimum $17 billion in taxes that would once again flow to US coffers. Instead, they accused Democrats of merely wanting to punish oil companies as a way of expressing the seething anger most American taxpayers feel over gas prices that have skyrocketed for no apparent reason.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Democrats said, “Yup, making oil companies pay their fair share and punishing them for excessive profits while Americans suffer is exactly what we wanted to do.”</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">“Why that’s un-American,” screamed GOP senators. All while they rushed to call John McCain in order to congratulate him for admitting that, if elected president, he’d continue a program that secretly wiretaps domestic phone calls made by American citizens.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">GOP senators made no comment on the bill’s increased margin account provision. What could they say? Big investment banks, hedge funds and brokerages won. Taxpayers lost a huge one. Best to pretend it never happened.  </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">But, Senator I.M. Forsale did applaud the effort. He said the move is part of an effort to make gas so expensive that “poor people won’t have the gas to drive to the bank to cash welfare checks… perverted homosexxxxxuaaaallls can’t afford to drive to city hall to get married and godless whore women are economically prevented from driving to Planned Parenthood clinics.”</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">He added, “$5 and $6 gas is finally going to shake the  losers, the sinners and the old out of the American family tree.”</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky acknowledged that Americans are hurting from the high-energy costs. But, he strongly opposed the Democrats&#8217; response and ridiculed those who “think we can tax our way out of this problem.”</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">&#8220;Republicans by and large believe that the solution to this problem, in part, is to increase domestic production,&#8221; McConnell said.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">A GOP energy plan, rejected by the Senate last month, calls for opening a coastal strip of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. Drilling in the ANWR would net the US about 454 days of oil, at its current 22-million-a-day burn rate.  And, it would take eight to ten years bring the first of this oil to market.</font></p>
<hr align="center" width="100%" />
<p align="center"><font color="#ff0000" size="2"><strong><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">INTERNAL   ENDORSEMENT</font></strong></font></p>
<p><font color="#ff0000" size="2"><strong></strong></font></p>
<p align="center"><font color="#ff0000" size="2"><strong></strong></font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong><font size="2">Just this   Once</font><br />
BELIEVE THE   HYPE!</strong></font></p>
<p align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong> </strong>It was the email that <em>shocked</em> the investment world. </font></p>
<p align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">One noted investment authority   told his readers to take <u>seven</u> huge stock market gains <u>on one day</u>… <strong>SEVEN HUGE WINNERS on one day that ranged   from 526% to 102%&#8230; seven, and on stocks…</strong> not   options.</font></p>
<p align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">But that was just the beginning!   It now looks to be setting up to happen again this year,   too.</font></p>
<p align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><strong><u><a href="http://www1.youreletters.com/t/1500744/35011814/1583090/0/" target="_blank">That’s   why you must check out the whole story right   here.</a></u></strong></font></p>
<hr align="center" width="100%" /><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Look, I have always leaned toward drilling in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge. But, only as long as ExxonMobil was not allowed to participate. XOM has done its bad deed for the last millennium up there.</font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">And, I never bought into the fact that 2,000 acres was the maximum land that would be disturbed. It will be more like 1.5 million acres, less than 10% of ANWR, which is something close to 2,300 square miles. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">I actually believe that oil field technology is advanced  enough that it would be fairly safe to drill there.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Of course, there’s the human element to consider… as in shortcuts and corrupt contractors.  And, with so much at stake, some people might try to cover up mistakes.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Then, I did some research and discovered just how little oil is in ANWR… modest predictions are 5.5 trillion barrels… best-case predictions suggest 10 trillion barrels.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">And, that is quite literally – even at the 10-trillion level  – a drop in the bucket. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">You see, the US Energy Information Agency reported that if Congress gave the go-ahead to pump oil from ANWR, the crude could begin flowing by 2017. It would reach a peak of 876,000 barrels a day by 2029.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">But even at peak production, the EIA analysis said, the United States would still have to import more than two-thirds of its oil.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">That’s 21 years until peak. And, that peak would be less than one million barrels a day. That’s less than 1/20th of our daily burn.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">And, this is a front-burner issue. For whom?</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Now, I rarely share with you the thoughts I send in private  to my <em>Asia Business &amp; Investing</em> subscribers… but a bit of what I wrote to them on Wednesday is an extension of  my thoughts here.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">This is what I wrote</font></p>
<blockquote><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><em>Here in the United States… apparently no one in charge is to blame for the state of the economy… fuel and food prices… except, of course, consumers who pay the prices.</em></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><em>Ron Reagan was known as the Teflon President because trouble didn’t stick to him. Today, US leaders in Washington eschew the Teflon, because no one is throwing anything at the White House or Congress.</em></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><em>It’s  you and I that need the Teflon.</em></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><em>After  all, it was greedy homeowners who created the credit crisis… not nominally  regulated banks and lenders.</em></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><em>It is SUV drivers and soccer moms in mini vans who have run up the price of oil – not totally unregulated oil futures speculators (Google “Enron Loophole” for the whole story) or the threatened veto of a farm bill that included a provision to close the seven-year old crooked loophole, which is well known among Washington highest echelons at both ends of Pennsylvania Ave.</em></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><em>…if you’re like me, when you look around don’t you occasionally wonder who led us to the state we are in today… and why everyone in Washington has escaped blame… or worse, won’t accept responsibility?</em></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><em>Instead, what we get is the Mitch McConnells of the world saying “we know Americans are hurting but there’s not a thing Congress can do about it – except to open up oil drilling in the Alaskan Nation Wildlife Refuge…”</em></font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><em>See, there it is again… Washington is not to blame… it’s those pesky, do-gooder, unpatriotic, environmentalists who are pissing in the soup</em>.</font></p></blockquote>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">So, how about this for an idea?</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">If this oil is so freekin’ critical to the US’s way of life, then we open up the ANWR for oil exploration, but with two huge restrictions.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">They would be that ExxonMobil is not allowed to participate  in the ANWR.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">And, oil company profits would be capped at 6%.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">You see, the US Geological Survey estimates that at $30 a barrel, oil company profits would be about 12% on ANWR oil&#8230; but, the Department of Energy, on Thursday, said that oil prices will be $129 a barrel in 2009. It should be $86 in 2010. And it should be back over a c-note at $107 in 2015.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">So, who knows how high profits would fly on ANWR oil by 2017  when its initial oil came to market.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">But, under my restrictions, every penny beyond a 6% profit would evenly flow directly to the Social Security Trust Fund and Medicare.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">And, I am certain that as patriotic Americans with the ability to help sustain the American way of life, US oil companies would rush to accept that deal.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Have a great weekend.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Andy</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">P.S.  To let me know what you thought of today&#8217;s article, send an e-mail to: <a href="mailto:feedback@investorsdailyedge.com" target="_blank"><font color="#0066cc"><u>feedback@investorsdailyedge.com</u></font></a>.</font></p>
<p><a href="http://www.investorsdailyedge.com/newsletter-archive.aspx">Source: Kiss Your Gas Goodbye</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/kiss-your-gas-goodbye/3032/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.263 seconds -->

