<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; bauxite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/bauxite/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Brazil is not Titusville</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/brazil-is-not-titusville/1645</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/brazil-is-not-titusville/1645#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Denning</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bauxite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carioca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drill bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIRB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Robard Hughes Sr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydro Aluminium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iron Ore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MGX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Petroleum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Exporters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santos Basin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UMC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/brazil-is-not-titusville/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Remember last week when the director of the Brazil National Petroleum Agency Haroldo Lima told the world that the Carioca oil field, &#8220;Could be the world&#8217;s biggest oil discovery in thirty years?&#8221; Let&#8217;s unpack the word &#8220;could.&#8221; It &#8220;could&#8221; be the world&#8217;s biggest oil field that will never enter into production.</font>&#8211;Carioca may contain as much as 33 billon barrels of oil equivalent. When you ad that to the big discovery of 8 billion barrels of oil equivalent at Tupi (located in the same Santos basin off Brazil&#8217;s coast), Brazil-if it could actually produce from these fields-would vault to number ten on the world&#8217; list of largest oil reserves, replacing Nigeria (which is having all sorts of trouble of its own).</p>
<p>&#8211;Hold&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Remember last week when the director of the Brazil National Petroleum Agency Haroldo Lima told the world that the Carioca oil field, &#8220;Could be the world&#8217;s biggest oil discovery in thirty years?&#8221; Let&#8217;s unpack the word &#8220;could.&#8221; It &#8220;could&#8221; be the world&#8217;s biggest oil field that will never enter into production.</font><span id="more-1645"></span>&#8211;Carioca may contain as much as 33 billon barrels of oil equivalent. When you ad that to the big discovery of 8 billion barrels of oil equivalent at Tupi (located in the same Santos basin off Brazil&#8217;s coast), Brazil-if it could actually produce from these fields-would vault to number ten on the world&#8217; list of largest oil reserves, replacing Nigeria (which is having all sorts of trouble of its own).</p>
<p>&#8211;Hold everything. How about a reality check?</p>
<p>&#8211;&#8221;Brazil&#8217;s plan to become one of the world&#8217;s biggest oil exporters hinges on exploiting crude 6 miles below the ocean surface in deposits so hot they can melt the metal used to carry uranium to nuclear plants,&#8221; reports Joe Carroll in Bloomberg this morning. It gets better (or worse, depending on your perspective).</p>
<p>&#8211;&#8221;Tapping what may be the biggest oil finds in the Western Hemisphere in three decades will require equipment that can withstand 18,000 pounds per square inch of pressure, enough to crush a pickup truck, pipes that can carry oil at temperatures above 500 degrees Fahrenheit (260 Celsius) and drill bits that can penetrate layers of salt more than one mile thick.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;The oil industry is becoming metals-intensive. And not just any metals. Our friends at <a href="http://www.portphillippublishing.com.au/research/osi/inflation.cfm?source=e9aoj401&amp;alias=ar149" target="_blank">Diggers and Drillers</a> call them &#8217;super metals,&#8217; which sounds about right. It takes a special kind of metal to withstand the heat and temperatures you find in off-shore, deep-sea oil operations. That&#8217;s probably the better investment angle than, say, buying Petrobras (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3APBR" target="_blank">PBR</a>).</p>
<p>&#8211;Think about this for a second. To produce oil from Carioca, Brazil will have to drill to a depth of 10,000 metres (32,000 feet). That is twice as far down as the world&#8217;s deepest current production hole. It&#8217;s also deeper in the ocean than Mt. Everest is high in the sky. It may as well be Mars or Venus or the moon for as otherworldly as the conditions are.</p>
<p>&#8211;The oil industry sure has come a long way from when Colonel Edwin Drake drilled his first well in Titusville, Pennsylvania in 1859. Drillers are going to places they&#8217;ve never gone before, and it&#8217;s not cheap. For example, Exxon had to develop special pipes for its Sakhalin II project in Siberia because steel pipes were shattering at the temperatures engineers encountered. Bloomberg reports that Chevron destroyed more than a dozen drill bits costing US$50,000 each in a $4.7 billion oil project in Tahiti.</p>
<p>&#8211;Where do you even buy $50,000 drill bits?</p>
<p>&#8211;Incidentally, did you know that Howard Hughes made his money in drill bits? We didn&#8217;t know it either until we researched the subject this morning. Cemented carbide cutting tools, or tools made of tungsten and diamond, are in great demand these days. But in the oil business, it was Howard Robard Hughes Sr. who introduced rotating steel cones to the wildcatters in East Texas in the first two decades of the twentieth century.</p>
<p>&#8211;Hughes held the patent on the first rotating tricone bit for 17 years, between 1934 and 1951. This was the peak of exploring and drilling in the Continental U.S. It made Hughes and his more famous and eccentric son Howard very rich. You can afford to be weird when you reach a certain level of wealth. It doesn&#8217;t make it right, though. If you want to see a picture of the Hughes drill bit, <a href="http://www.oobject.com/category/ferocious-oil-drill-bits/" target="_blank">check this out</a>.</p>
<p>&#8211;Resources Minister Martin Ferguson told the ABC that contrary to reports in The Australian last week, the Federal Government has not told Chinese companies to &#8220;back off&#8221; in their pursuit of their Australian quarry.</p>
<p>&#8211;Right. You don&#8217;t imagine the Federal Government could come right out and tell China to get lost. It doesn&#8217;t want that to happen. But in an interesting coincidence, Stephen Wyatt reports in yesterday&#8217;s Financial Review that the, &#8220;Chinese may relent in iron-ore negotiations.&#8221; This refers to the reluctance of Chinese steel producers to pay a &#8216;freight premium&#8217; for Australian iron ore (over and above what China pays for Brazilian ore).</p>
<p>&#8211;We called the Foreign Investment Review Board (FIRB) ourselves yesterday to see if they publish any information on foreign companies seeking to acquire $100 million or more of an Australian publicly listed company.</p>
<p>&#8211;&#8221;No we do not,&#8221; we were told.</p>
<p>&#8211;Fair enough. Here&#8217;s what we know. In early April the FIRB shot down a bid by the Shougang Group (China&#8217;s sixth largest steel maker) for Mount Gibson Iron Ore (ASX:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ASX%3AMGX&amp;hl=en" target="_blank">MGX</a>). We know that Shenzhen Zhongjin Lingnan Nonfemet Co Ltd has a joint bid with and Indonesian firm Herald Resources Ltd (ASX:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ASX%3AHER&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den" target="_blank">HER</a>). We also know that China&#8217;s state-owned MCC Mining has bid A$400 million one Cape Lambert Iron Ore&#8217;s Ltd (ASX:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ASX%3ACFE&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den" target="_blank">CFE</a>) iron ore projects.</p>
<p>&#8211;There are other deals in the works. China Shenhua Group, China Coal Energy, and Yanzhou Coal Mining Co Ltd (listed in Hong Kong and China&#8217;s third biggest coal producer by market cap) are all interested in Australian coal. And Chinese iron ore trader Haoning Group would like to buy a stake in iron ore producer Brockman Resources Ltd (ASX:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ASX%3ABRM&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den" target="_blank">BRM</a>).</p>
<p>&#8211;That&#8217;s what we know. What we don&#8217;t know is what Australia and China are saying to each other behind closed doors. And we don&#8217;t know what other Aussie companies might be on Chinese watch lists.</p>
<p>&#8211;If the FIRB isn&#8217;t going to tell us, there are other ways of prospecting around. Gabriel has been working on some technical and fundamental stock screens that produce at least ten new trading ideas each day (five momentum up, five momentum down).</p>
<p>&#8211;We&#8217;re experimenting with the variables, but this morning we asked him if a stock with symbol UMC had shown up on any of his screens. &#8220;Yes, yesterday it did. On the momentum up screen.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;The stock came up on our computer screen last night when we were reading up on news from the bauxite market. UMC is the United Minerals Corporation (ASX:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ASX%3AUMC&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den" target="_blank">UMC</a>). Please read this next note. We are not tipping it and have done no diligence on the stock at all.</p>
<p>&#8211;We do note, however, that the company is chasing both iron ore and bauxite in the Pilbara. That got our attention. We aren&#8217;t tipping it, but we wanted to know more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/brazil-is-not-titusville/1645/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia Tells China to Back Off</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/australia-tells-china-to-back-off/1586</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/australia-tells-china-to-back-off/1586#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Denning</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bauxite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodities Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eucla Basin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illiquidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murray Basin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olymipic protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palladium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pemex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platinum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/australia-tells-china-to-back-off/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana" size="2"> Is the U.S. Fed done cutting rates? The commodities market seems to think so. Gold, platinum, palladium and silver all fell by the end of New York trading. Even oil was off its all-time highs though still above US$115. </font><br />
<font face="Verdana" size="2"><br />
&#8211;Frankly, we have no idea what&#8217;s next for the Fed. You should familiarize yourself with the term &#8220;quantitative easing,&#8221; though. When a central bank can no longer take short-term interest rates any lower, what does it do? After all, real interest rates can be negative (an interest rate below the rate of inflation). But nominal interest rates cannot go below zero. Hence the obscure but somewhat famous phrase, &#8220;zero bound.&#8221;</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&#8211;Yet central banks faced with deflating asset prices bubbles and illiquidity in&#8230;</font></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana" size="2"> Is the U.S. Fed done cutting rates? The commodities market seems to think so. Gold, platinum, palladium and silver all fell by the end of New York trading. Even oil was off its all-time highs though still above US$115. </font><span id="more-1586"></span><br />
<font face="Verdana" size="2"><br />
&#8211;Frankly, we have no idea what&#8217;s next for the Fed. You should familiarize yourself with the term &#8220;quantitative easing,&#8221; though. When a central bank can no longer take short-term interest rates any lower, what does it do? After all, real interest rates can be negative (an interest rate below the rate of inflation). But nominal interest rates cannot go below zero. Hence the obscure but somewhat famous phrase, &#8220;zero bound.&#8221;</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&#8211;Yet central banks faced with deflating asset prices bubbles and illiquidity in inter-bank lending markets can&#8217;t just sit around and do nothing, now can they? But when lowering short term interest rates no longer has the effect of adding liquidity to the system, what can you do? That&#8217;s where quantitative easing comes in.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&#8211;The Bank of Japan engaged in quantitative easing to try and inflate Japan out of its decade-long deflationary spiral. It worked, sort of (although the results aren&#8217;t really in yet.) Could the Fed do the same thing and what would the consequences be?</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&#8211;First off, the Fed funds target rate is 2.25% and the discount rate 2.50%. So we still have 225 basis points to until zero. But trouble in the credit market persists.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&#8211;Remember that Primary Dealer Credit Facility (PDCF) the Fed set up for Wall Street investment banks to borrow from? Who could forget it really? In the week ended April 23, borrowing from that cash take-out window averaged $US10.73 billion…per day. No wonder financial stocks had a good week on Wall Street</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&#8211;And what about the Term Securities Lending Facility? Remember that one? That&#8217;s where primary dealers can exchange dodgy mortgage-backed debt for the Fed&#8217;s not-so-inexhaustible supply of U.S. Treasuries for fixed periods determined at an auction. Total borrowings from that Facility are just under $US160 billion. The Fed offered another $75billion in Treasuries this week. $59 billion worth were scooped up.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&#8211;How is the Fed&#8217;s supply of Treasuries holding out? It&#8217;s got about $548 billion to go. Will this be enough to sustain financial institutions that keep reporting surprise losses? Hmmn.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&#8211;In quantitative easing, the Fed would target longer-term interest rates by abandoning its clever pretence and simply printing brand new money to buy bonds and bank assets. This is a bare-knuckled banking attempt to restore &#8220;liquidity&#8221; to the financial system. Despite the Fed&#8217;s best efforts, this is still evidence that the credit markets aren&#8217;t quite right. There was a spike in the over-night rate banks charge each other to borrow (LIBOR) late last week.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&#8211;Our point? The credit crisis is still very much alive and unwell. It&#8217;s just going on behind closed doors. This gives the stock market the cover to behave as if everything is okay. We report. You decide.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&#8211;By the way, it&#8217;s obvious that further rate cuts by the Fed and quantitative easing would be unwelcome by central bankers in Europe, who rightly fear inflation more than deflating asset prices. Dollar rallies should be viewed with deep scepticism. But even the greenback will get a break every now and then. Traders in gold are taking profits…and probably waiting for the next wave of the crisis to break. It will.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&#8211;Speaking of which, new home sales fell to 17-year lows in America. The decline of 8.7% from the month before was worse than expected. But the truly disappointing news is that median prices for new homes fell 13.3%, the biggest decline in 40 years. And get this, sales were 36% lower than March of last year.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&#8211;Ouch. The lower price is good news in the sense that we&#8217;re closer to a &#8220;clearing price&#8221; at which some new buyers would begin thinking of getting back in the market (if they can get a mortgage from the newly-stingy banks). But with inventories of homes sufficient to last 11 months at the current rate of sales, sellers still outweigh buyers by a lot.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&#8211;The worry now is that declining median prices for new and existing homes drag more mortgage holders under water. That is, folks who are making their mortgage payments just fine right now may nevertheless see the value of their asset dipping below the value of the mortgage. What will they do then?</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&#8211;While America&#8217;s housing-based economy slowly dis-integrates, we have the strange spectacle of Chinese students being bussed to Canberra to drown out and obscure pro-Tibet protestors at the Olympic torch relay. One Empire falls away into disrepair. Another one rises.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&#8211;This whole torch relay has become a bit of farce, hasn&#8217;t it? But we admit it&#8217;s an entertaining one. Did anyone really think that Chinese people would enjoy having their government and their games bashed by the foreign press in a systematic fashion as the torch makes its way around the globe? They are reacting in exactly the way you would expect of a nation whose pride has been insulted, with anger.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&#8211;This offended national pride is irrational and thus very common. When we trotted around the globe in 2003 doing research for our book the Bull Hunter, we found that every where they went, people were proud of where they came from. Most thought that there country was the greatest country in the world. France, England, Japan, India, China and of course America…every one of them has a myth of national greatness that makes people stubbornly and stupidly defensive of their moronic national politicians. What a fraud.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&#8211;Just why people confuse the goodness of a people with the greatness of national government is a mystery. Perhaps it&#8217;s simply a tribal pride thing. Governments shamelessly manipulate this sense of wanting to belong to something greater. And so the Chinese are notifying the world that not only are the Olympics the achievement of a great nation and a great people, but you had better respect that. There&#8217;s no &#8220;or else,&#8221; at least not yet.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&#8211;Australians, to their great credit, do not seem to engage in this national greatness kind of chest thumping. Even today, on ANZAC day, we note as an outsider that it&#8217;s seems less like a celebration of abstract patriotic national values and more like a celebration of the sacrifices people make for one another when they are swept up in events over which they have no control. At least that&#8217;s how are choosing to interpret it.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&#8211;&#8221;China told to shelve mine deals,&#8221; reports Jennifer Hewitt in today&#8217;s Australian. That&#8217;s interesting. &#8220;At least 10 Chinese companies have withdrawn foreign investment applications to buy into Australian resources companies after pressure from the Rudd Government. The Government has in recent weeks made it plain privately that it wants more time to consider the issue of the national interest in terms of ownership of the Australian resources industry.&#8221;</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">&#8211;Resource nationalisation happens, even in free markets. Will it happen in Australia? Well, the resources aren&#8217;t much good to the national economy if you don&#8217;t create jobs to mine and produce them so you can sell them for export income. But perhaps the Rudd government has a point it would like to make about the emerging character of the Chinese-Australian relationship. We have no idea what that point would be. But, &#8220;back off&#8221; would appear to be part of it.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/australia-tells-china-to-back-off/1586/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.204 seconds -->

