<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; BNP Paribas SA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/bnp-paribas-sa/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>If Holiday Retail Stats Don’t Have Economists Saying “Humbug,” Tuesday’s GDP Report Certainly Will</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/if-holiday-retail-stats-don%e2%80%99t-have-economists-saying-%e2%80%9chumbug%e2%80%9d-tuesday%e2%80%99s-gdp-report-certainly-will/10437</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/if-holiday-retail-stats-don%e2%80%99t-have-economists-saying-%e2%80%9chumbug%e2%80%9d-tuesday%e2%80%99s-gdp-report-certainly-will/10437#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNP Paribas SA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford Motor Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santa Claus rally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=10437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If it’s good enough for Wal-Mart… Looks like the discounting model pioneered by Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=wmt" target="_blank">WMT</a>),  the Bentonville, Ark.-based retailing giant, will make its way to some rather  unlikely high-end retailers: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=9215504" target="_blank">Barney’s New York Inc</a>. and <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=703381" target="_blank">Neiman Marcus Inc</a>. have announced significant price reductions (up to 75%) over the next few days to avoid a disastrous holiday shopping season.</p>
<p>For optimists, the message here is that all hope for holiday retail sales  is not yet lost. A <strong><a href="http://www.nrf.com/" target="_blank">National Retail Federation</a></strong> survey showed  that <a href="http://www.nrf.com/modules.php?name=News&#38;op=viewlive&#38;sp_id=618" target="_blank">only  47% of consumers have finished their holiday shopping and another 19% have not  even started</a>.  As a dismal 2008 comes to a close, the last die-hard eternal optimists are calling for a year-end Santa Claus Rally, as&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it’s good enough for Wal-Mart… Looks like the discounting model pioneered by Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=wmt" target="_blank">WMT</a>),  the Bentonville, Ark.-based retailing giant, will make its way to some rather  unlikely high-end retailers: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=9215504" target="_blank">Barney’s New York Inc</a>. and <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=703381" target="_blank">Neiman Marcus Inc</a>. have announced significant price reductions (up to 75%) over the next few days to avoid a disastrous holiday shopping season.<span id="more-10437"></span></p>
<p>For optimists, the message here is that all hope for holiday retail sales  is not yet lost. A <strong><a href="http://www.nrf.com/" target="_blank">National Retail Federation</a></strong> survey showed  that <a href="http://www.nrf.com/modules.php?name=News&amp;op=viewlive&amp;sp_id=618" target="_blank">only  47% of consumers have finished their holiday shopping and another 19% have not  even started</a>.  As a dismal 2008 comes to a close, the last die-hard eternal optimists are calling for a year-end Santa Claus Rally, as the government bailouts and U.S. Federal Reserve actions give investors some hope for 2009 and beyond.</p>
<p>But such blind optimism too often ignores a key point or two. The Dallas-based Neiman Marcus, for instance, just announced that its third-quarter earnings plunged 84% because of its aggressive discounting, the <strong><em>Dallas  Morning News</em></strong> reported. <a href="http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewiStockNews/articleid/2871530" target="_blank">And  since the discounting will continue, so will the decline in profits</a>, the  high-end retailer conceded.</p>
<p>With even luxury retailers discounting to try and salvage something from the holiday shopping season, the outlook for lackluster sales and even-more-lackluster earnings feeds into an already dour outlook for the U.S. economy.</p>
<p>And if that doesn’t squelch the optimists’ ardor, then a looming revision in the third-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) – last reported as minus 0.5% – will almost certainly bring them back to the realities of the sluggish economy.</p>
<p>It may even force those optimistic economists to finally say: “Bah Humbug.”</p>
<p>That GDP report is due out tomorrow (Tuesday).</p>
<h3><strong>Market  Matters</strong></h3>
<p>Though perhaps it’s wishful thinking, there are some analysts who point out that one or more of any number catalysts could jump-start the economy and the financial markets in the New Year, putting the past few miserable months in the rearview mirror.  They argue that the trillions of dollars in bailout money pumped into the financial system should finally start to provide badly needed liquidity; the Fed seems intent to do “whatever it takes” to reverse, or at least blunt, the current downturn (<a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/03/bailout-programs/" target="_blank">even if runaway  inflation may be a repercussion</a> down the road); an “Obamanomics” <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/19/securities-and-exchange-commission-nominee-mary-schapiro/" target="_blank">stimulus  plan</a> could create new jobs, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/18/economic-stimulus/" target="_blank">while  enhancing the country’s aging infrastructure</a>; <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/17/federal-open-market-committee/" target="_blank">risk-free  Treasury yields at 0.00%</a> should start to look less and less attractive, prompting investors to look into stocks and non-government bonds again. Just a few last minute items to add to the holiday investment-shopping wish list.</p>
<p>Sadly, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/17/bernard-madoff/" target="_blank">Bernie Madoff saw  to it that his investors will have a holiday season to forget</a> as the list  of prominent victims grew each day: Real estate mogul Mort Zuckerman, U.S. Sen. <a href="http://lautenberg.senate.gov/" target="_blank">Frank R. Lautenberg</a>, D-N.J.,  Hollywood movie mogul <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Spielberg" target="_blank">Steven  Spielberg</a>, Spanish bank <strong>Banco</strong> <strong>Santander SA (ADR: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ASTD" target="_blank">STD</a>)</strong>, France’s <strong><a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ASTD" target="_blank">BNP Paribas SA</a></strong>, <strong>Nomura</strong> <strong>Holdings Inc. (ADR: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ANMR" target="_blank">NMR</a>)</strong>, and many  charitable foundations and non-profit organization were among the people and  institutions victimized.</p>
<p>Plenty of finger-pointing has been directed at the <a href="http://www.sec.gov/" target="_blank">U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission</a> (SEC) for  failing to uncover some rather obvious signs of wrongdoing through the years.  As <strong><em>Money  Morning</em></strong> reported even before the official announcement was made, U.S.  President-elect Barack Obama tapped <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/18/mary-l-schapiro/" target="_blank">FINRA Chief  Executive Officer Mary L. Schapiro to head the SEC</a> during this time of  turmoil. Congrats on the appointment, I guess?</p>
<p>The Detroit Big Three automakers  received early holiday cheer as <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/19/gm-chrysler/" target="_blank">the U.S. Treasury Department will release $17.4 billion of Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) money in return for potential equity stakes and other concessions from management and unions</a>.  <strong>General Motors Corp.</strong> (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=gm" target="_blank">GM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=4090940" target="_blank">Chrysler  LLC</a> will be the recipients, while <strong>Ford  Motor Co.</strong> (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=f" target="_blank">F</a>) pursues –  for now – the go-it-alone strategy. Meanwhile, Chrysler will be <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/19/chrysler-factories/" target="_blank">shutting down  all of its North American production plants for at least a month</a> and also will begin charging dealers large fees on unsold cars that remain on their lots after prolonged periods.  In perhaps a sign of things to come, a consortium of 14 companies – including <strong>3M Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mmm" target="_blank">MMM</a>)</strong> and <strong>Johnson Controls Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=jci" target="_blank">JCI</a></strong>) – have asked for $1 billion in government funding to begin manufacturing state-of-the-art batteries for electric cars.  The move is reminiscent of action taken by computer chip firms decades ago that helped make the industry more competitive domestically. (Johnson Controls also announced last week that <a href="http://news.alibaba.com/article/detail/business-in-china/100032087-1-johnson-controls-set-up-auto.html" target="_blank">it  would invest $90 million to open a lead-acid-battery-production plant</a> in  China’s green-power energy industrial center in Changxing Economic Development  Zone of <a href="http://news.alibaba.com/article/list/1/zhejiang.html" target="_blank">Zhejiang</a> province, <strong><em>Alibaba.com</em></strong> reported).</p>
<p>Energy traders <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/18/opec-production/" target="_blank">disregarded the decision by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) to cut production by a record 2.2 million barrels a day</a>, fearing lack of compliance by its members. Instead, traders chose to focus on the shrinking demand in the sluggish economy as oil prices briefly fell below $35a barrel to levels not seen since 2004. <strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=gs" target="_blank">GS</a>) </strong>reported its first-ever  quarterly loss and <strong>Morgan Stanley</strong> <strong>(<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ms" target="_blank">MS</a>)</strong> followed with a  shortfall of its own.</p>
<p><strong>FedEx Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=fdx" target="_blank">FDX</a>)</strong> posted a higher profit, but gave a dire outlook and announced major compensation cuts for senior management (and benefits cuts for the rank and file).  Stocks were relatively flat as investors digested the latest on Madoff, the auto bailout, and significant Fed actions.</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="432" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Market/ Index</strong></td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Year Close (2007)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Qtr Close (09/30/08)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous Week</strong><br />
<strong>(12/12/08)</strong></td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Current Week </strong><br />
<strong>(12/19/08)</strong></td>
<td width="90" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Dow Jones Industrial</td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">13,264.82</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">10,850.66</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,629.68</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>8,579.11</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="90" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-35.32%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">NASDAQ</td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2,652.28</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2,091.88</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,540.72</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>1,564.32</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="90" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-41.02%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,468.36</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,164.74</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">879.73</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>887.88</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="90" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-39.53%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Russell 2000</td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">766.03</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">679.58</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">468.43</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>486.26</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="90" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-36.52%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Funds</td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">4.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.00%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1.00%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0.25%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="90" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-400 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">10 yr Treasury (Yield)</td>
<td width="64" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">4.04%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.83%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.59%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>2.13%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="90" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-191 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3><strong>Economically  Speaking</strong></h3>
<p>&#8220;The Federal Reserve will employ all available tools to promote the resumption of sustainable economic growth and to preserve price stability.&#8221;</p>
<p>Too bad Fed Chief Ben S.  Bernanke couldn’t punctuate that last statement with a hearty “Ho, ho, ho –  happy holidays.”</p>
<p>After setting the target for the Federal Funds rate at 0.00% to 0.25%, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) policymakers revealed they are studying other measures and may purchase U.S. Treasuries at some point in an effort to stimulate the financial markets.<br />
There are already some signs that the central bank’s action already are working. Mortgage rates have dropped dramatically and borrowers are taking advantage of refinancing opportunities to save on future interest payments.  Investors are finding value in corporate and municipal securities, as certain high-quality issues are yielding more than 6% more than comparable Treasuries. Meanwhile, Japan’s central bank followed suit with a rate cut (to 0.1%) of its own.</p>
<p>More details of the Obama stimulus plan emerged during the week and his economic team pegs the total package at about $800 billion (or more than $1 trillion by the time Congress adds its required “pork.”).  Tax cuts of up to $100 billion will serve as the most immediate stimuli, with construction (infrastructure), energy and healthcare among the industries that will benefit the most over time.</p>
<p>The data of the week revealed  that his package can not arrive soon enough.  <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/17/obama-housing-plan/" target="_blank">Housing  starts fell by 18.9%</a>, to a record low, and declining building permits did not offer much promise for future construction. Another forecasting release, leading economic indicators, fell for the second consecutive month; in fact, over the past six months, the index has experienced its worst decline since 1991.</p>
<p>The inflation picture remains favorable, though naysayers find pessimistic views in that data as well.  The November consumer price index (CPI) fell 1.7%, the largest decline on record (since 1947), as gasoline prices plummeted by 29.5%. While the deflation-mongers claim that falling prices will force consumers to delay purchases (for when they become even cheaper), others point out that gas purchases can not be delayed, as people have to get to work (and few are choosing to ride their bikes or shift into mass transportation).  In reality, plunging gasoline serves as a stimulus package without any government interaction (though OPEC is getting involved).</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic  Calendar </strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="346" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td width="123" valign="top"><strong>Release</strong></td>
<td width="148" valign="top"><strong>Comments </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top">December 15</td>
<td width="123" valign="top">Industrial Production (11/08)</td>
<td width="148" valign="top">Slightly    better than expected manufacturing report</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top">December 16</td>
<td width="123" valign="top">Housing Starts (11/08)</td>
<td width="148" valign="top">Worst drop in 24 years with no    end in sight</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"></td>
<td width="123" valign="top">CPI (11/08)</td>
<td width="148" valign="top">Largest decline in consumer    inflation on record (1947)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"></td>
<td width="123" valign="top">Fed Policy Meeting Statement</td>
<td width="148" valign="top">Targeted funds rate between 0%    and 0.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top">December 18</td>
<td width="123" valign="top">Initial Jobless Claims (12/13)</td>
<td width="148" valign="top">Slightly better than expected    labor report</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"></td>
<td width="123" valign="top">Leading Eco Indicators (11/08)</td>
<td width="148" valign="top">2nd consecutive    monthly decline</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></td>
<td width="123" valign="top"><strong></strong></td>
<td width="148" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top">December 23</td>
<td width="123" valign="top">GDP (3rd Quarter)</td>
<td width="148" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"></td>
<td width="123" valign="top">Existing Home Sales (11/08)</td>
<td width="148" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"></td>
<td width="123" valign="top">New Home Sales (11/08)</td>
<td width="148" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top">December 24</td>
<td width="123" valign="top">Initial Jobless Claims (12/20)</td>
<td width="148" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"></td>
<td width="123" valign="top">Durable Goods Orders (11/08)</td>
<td width="148" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top"></td>
<td width="123" valign="top">Personal Income/Spending (11/08)</td>
<td width="148" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="67" valign="top">December 25</td>
<td width="123" valign="top">Christmas Day</td>
<td width="148" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/22/holiday-shopping-season/">Source:  If Holiday Retail Stats Don’t Have Economists Saying “Humbug,” Tuesday’s GDP Report Certainly Will </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/if-holiday-retail-stats-don%e2%80%99t-have-economists-saying-%e2%80%9chumbug%e2%80%9d-tuesday%e2%80%99s-gdp-report-certainly-will/10437/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fed Policymakers to Cut Rates Today … But Does Anyone Really Care?</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/fed-policymakers-to-cut-rates-today-%e2%80%a6-but-does-anyone-really-care/10131</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/fed-policymakers-to-cut-rates-today-%e2%80%a6-but-does-anyone-really-care/10131#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barclays Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Three Automakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNP Paribas SA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bond Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Funds Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WFC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=10131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With the economy in a tailspin, the U.S. Federal  Reserve policymakers will today (Tuesday) almost certainly cut the benchmark <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_funds_rate">Federal Funds</a> rate  from its current 1.0% to 0.5%.</p>
<p>So the question no longer seems to be whether the  Fed will ease, but whether the move will make any difference.</p>
<p>The Fed has been hamstrung by a credit-market double-whammy: borrowers who are in limbo due to fears of soaring unemployment, and banks that have turned off the lending spigot. Even so, a U.S. economy facing its worst financial crisis since the Great Depression demands the central bank take decisive action.</p>
<p>That has led to a strong undercurrent of opinion among analysts that the Fed will pursue other measures to spark a moribund U.S. economy.</p>
<p>&#8220;We look&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the economy in a tailspin, the U.S. Federal  Reserve policymakers will today (Tuesday) almost certainly cut the benchmark <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_funds_rate">Federal Funds</a> rate  from its current 1.0% to 0.5%.</p>
<p>So the question no longer seems to be whether the  Fed will ease, but whether the move will make any difference.</p>
<p>The Fed has been hamstrung by a credit-market double-whammy: borrowers who are in limbo due to fears of soaring unemployment, and banks that have turned off the lending spigot. Even so, a U.S. economy facing its worst financial crisis since the Great Depression demands the central bank take decisive action.</p>
<p>That has led to a strong undercurrent of opinion among analysts that the Fed will pursue other measures to spark a moribund U.S. economy.</p>
<p>&#8220;We look for the accompanying  statement to highlight that the main nexus of policy in the coming months will  be <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/This-a-really-bad-recession/story.aspx?guid=%7bAB194334-CB9E-4B69-9AF4-9866D4E15E5B%7d">quantitative  easing operations</a>, and we expect these operations to be aimed at lowering borrowing costs for households and businesses,&#8221; Dean Maki, economist for Barclays Capital Management (ADR: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABCS">BCS</a>), told <strong><em>MarketWatch.com.</em></strong></p>
<p>In other words, get ready for another attempt to kick-start bank lending by injecting more federal cash into the U.S. financial system.</p>
<p>One move the Fed could make is to buy massive amounts of  U.S. Treasuries in an effort to keep yields from rising. Fed Chairman <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Bernanke">Ben S. Bernanke</a> suggested in a Dec. 1 speech that the central bank might buy “longer-term Treasury or agency securities on the open market in substantial quantities.”</p>
<p>Bond market traders seemed to confirm that notion yesterday (Monday) by driving the price of 10-year Treasuries higher for a third straight day. The yield curve, the difference in yield between two-and 10-year notes, flattened as the difference between the two narrowed.</p>
<p>Driven lately by uncertainty over the Bush administration’s handling of the Big Three automakers’ bailout, investors have pushed yields on Treasuries to record lows. Treasury security yields last week reached the lowest levels since the U.S. started selling two, five, 10- and 30-year securities.</p>
<p>In a report issued last week, JPMorgan Chase &amp;  Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AJPM">JPM</a>) predicted the yield on Treasuries in 2009 will be driven as low as 1.65% (from about 2.65% currently) amid “high uncertainty.”<br />
Unloading stocks, corporate bonds and debt from  mortgage-finance companies Fannie Mae (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AFNM">FNM</a>) and Freddie Mac  (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:FRE">FRE</a>), investors purchased $34.6 billion of Treasury securities in October, up from $20.7 billion in September, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.<br />
“You still have a <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aMHa0MCNFWRo&amp;refer=home">massive  paranoia</a> in the marketplace and you’ve got that safety-at-any-cost  mentality,” Jay Mueller of Wells Fargo Capital Management (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=wfc">WFC</a>) told <strong><em>Bloomberg  News</em></strong>. “People are not buying Treasury bills because they think the yields are attractive. They are buying them because they are afraid to put money anywhere else.”</p>
<p>According to Merrill Lynch &amp; Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AMER">MER</a>), U.S. government bonds have returned 12.4% so far in 2008. That’s the best return since 2000, when they gained 13.4%. Meanwhile, the <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP:.INX">Standard &amp; Poor’s  500 Index</a> is down 40%, and the <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=Dow+Jones+Industrial+Average">Dow  Jones Industrial Average</a> has lost 35%.</p>
<h3>The Fed’s Arsenal</h3>
<p>The Fed is pulling out every weapon in its arsenal to avoid deflation.  A sustained drop in asset prices is the central bank’s worst fear since it could lead to more foreclosures and heightened economic chaos.</p>
<p>One undesirable side effect of the numerous economic stimulus packages is the potential for inflation and a decline in the dollar.  Based on its actions, the Fed is apparently willing to take that risk.</p>
<p>In fact, speculation around the probable Fed interest rate cut knocked the greenback down to a two-month low against the euro, touching $1.3703 yesterday, the lowest it’s been since Oct. 14.  With reduced demand for the dollar as a safe haven, the greenback dropped to a 13-year low against the Japanese yen and also lost ground to the British pound.</p>
<p>“We will stay in a low-interest-rate environment  for some time,” Fabian Eliasson, vice president of currency sales at <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=Mizuho+Corporate+Bank+Ltd">Mizuho  Corporate Bank Ltd</a>. in New York, told <strong><em>Bloomberg</em></strong>. “That will take away  interest-rate play, and the dollar will suffer.”</p>
<p>After a four-month rally of 24%, consensus  estimates for the dollar issued last week by Citigroup Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AC">C</a>), Goldman Sachs Group  Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=+gs">GS</a>), <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=BNP+Paribas+SA+">BNP Paribas SA</a> and Bank of America Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=bac">BAC</a>),  predicted further weakness against the euro.</p>
<p>After strengthening from July to November, the U.S. currency has retreated by 6.6% from a two-year high on Nov. 21, as measured by the trade-weighted Dollar Index. The dollar has fallen against the euro, yen, pound, Canadian dollar, Swiss franc and Swedish krona since peaking three weeks ago.</p>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/16/fed-interest-rates-2/">Fed Policymakers to Cut  Rates Today … But Does Anyone Really Care?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/fed-policymakers-to-cut-rates-today-%e2%80%a6-but-does-anyone-really-care/10131/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Base Metals Sag</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/base-metals-sag-2/9352</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/base-metals-sag-2/9352#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Casey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aluminum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNP Paribas SA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copper Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Casey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nickel Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zinc Prices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=9352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="maintextDRP">The base metals were mostly mired in negative territory on Friday. Copper fell from the pre-dawn hours to mid-morning, then rallied back, finishing at $1.6414/lb., up a half-cent from Tuesday. </p>
<p class="maintextDRP">Nickel declined until nearly mid-morning, then rose, but not enough to take it back to break-even as it closed at $4.449/lb., down 9 cents. Zinc mirrored nickel’s performance, also ending down in the red at $0.5337/lb., down 2 2/3 cents. Aluminum had another weak day, giving up just over 2 cents to $0.7725/lb., while lead, despite a strong rally late, dropped 3½ cents, to $0.4946/lb.</p>
<p>Copper was little changed, but wound up November down 9.8% for the month. It was the fifth straight month of declines for the metal, marking the&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="maintextDRP">The base metals were mostly mired in negative territory on Friday. Copper fell from the pre-dawn hours to mid-morning, then rallied back, finishing at $1.6414/lb., up a half-cent from Tuesday. <span id="more-9352"></span></p>
<p class="maintextDRP">Nickel declined until nearly mid-morning, then rose, but not enough to take it back to break-even as it closed at $4.449/lb., down 9 cents. Zinc mirrored nickel’s performance, also ending down in the red at $0.5337/lb., down 2 2/3 cents. Aluminum had another weak day, giving up just over 2 cents to $0.7725/lb., while lead, despite a strong rally late, dropped 3½ cents, to $0.4946/lb.</p>
<p>Copper was little changed, but wound up November down 9.8% for the month. It was the fifth straight month of declines for the metal, marking the longest such streak since early 1999.</p>
<p>“Markets are under pressure on account of the bearish macro backdrop, which is directly manifesting itself through rising LME stock levels,” said Edward Meir, of MF Global (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=MF+Global">MF</a>).</p>
<p>That was certainly the case yesterday, as inventories monitored by the LME rose 1%, to 291,650 metric tons, the highest level since February 25, 2004.</p>
<p>Forecasts have gotten very gloomy indeed. Copper supplies are expected to exceed demand next year by 250,000 metric tons, RBS Global Banking &amp; Markets wrote yesterday. And that’s the good news, as the surplus will then widen to 500,000 tons in 2010, the bank estimates.</p>
<p>The situation appears equally bad concerning aluminum, whose losing streak equals that of copper’s. Aluminum supply will outpace demand by 1.4 million metric tons next year, or double this year’s surplus, according to <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=Paribas">BNP Paribas SA</a>.</p>
<p>Traders are concerned that China may reduce or even cancel taxes on primary aluminum exports. That was the word from unnamed sources in the China Nonferrous Metals Industry Association.</p>
<p>Said Michael Widmer, a BNP Paribas analyst in London, “If more metal found its way outside China we would have an even bigger oversupply in the global aluminum market.”</p>
<p>On the other hand, <em>Reuters</em> reported that, “China is looking at buying base metals as state or commercial reserves to take advantage of the lowest prices for years and bolster weak demand, industry sources said on Friday.”</p>
<p>In addition, Reuters wrote, “Beijing, keen to help strengthen smelters as it looks to bolster the economy, is changing a long-established policy of restricting expansion in the resource-intensive metals industry.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.caseyresearch.com/displayDrpArchives.php">Source: Base Metals Sag</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/base-metals-sag-2/9352/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.276 seconds -->

