<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; Bond Fund</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/bond-fund/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:01:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Buy, Sell or Hold: The iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond Fund</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/buy-sell-or-hold-the-ishares-iboxx-investment-grade-corporate-bond-fund/20113</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/buy-sell-or-hold-the-ishares-iboxx-investment-grade-corporate-bond-fund/20113#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Horacio Marquez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AXP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bond Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diversification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downward Trend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Early Spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Etf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Domestic Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hanging In The Balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Insurers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horacio Marquez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ishares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LQD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Wave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Udn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US dollar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. stock market has enjoyed a strong rally since the early spring, but while the economy has shown improvement, it still faces major headwinds. So it may be best to hedge against the U.S. dollar, which is likely to experience a significant decline over the next few months. </p>
<p>There are a lot of uncertainties permeating the market right now, not the least of which is healthcare reform. Will that reform entail a public option that could add $1 trillion to the deficit?  How is reform going to be financed?  And is it going to mean higher costs for employers across the board, or just the healthcare insurers?</p>
<p>Investing is made infinitely more difficult when 18% of U.S.  gross domestic product&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. stock market has enjoyed a strong rally since the early spring, but while the economy has shown improvement, it still faces major headwinds. So it may be best to hedge against the U.S. dollar, which is likely to experience a significant decline over the next few months. </p>
<p>There are a lot of uncertainties permeating the market right now, not the least of which is healthcare reform. Will that reform entail a public option that could add $1 trillion to the deficit?  How is reform going to be financed?  And is it going to mean higher costs for employers across the board, or just the healthcare insurers?</p>
<p>Investing is made infinitely more difficult when 18% of U.S.  gross domestic product (GDP) is hanging in the balance.</p>
<p>And you still have to consider:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>That unemployment is likely       to keep rising, perhaps over 10%.</li>
<li>That the U.S. Federal       Reserve’s policy of quantitative easing is slowing down.</li>
<li>That there is almost       certainly a second wave of home foreclosures on top of the <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/08/10/commercial-real-estate/" target="_blank">current       commercial real estate epidemic</a>.</li>
<li>And that retail sales are       still a long way from recovery.</li>
</ul>
<p>There is also reason to believe that the U.S. dollar will continue to be weak, though it probably won’t sell off precipitously.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2009/08/21/business-eu-euro-dollar_6802055.html" target="_blank">U.S.  dollar has weekend against the Euro lately</a>, having fallen 0.8% Friday.  Technically speaking the chart shows a traditional “cup and handle” formation that could lead to an acceleration of the dollar’s downward trend.  Gold prices, up about 13% Friday, confirm this trend and could soon break through the $1000/oz resistance.</p>
<p>Fundamentally, if the economy – encumbered by high unemployment and a relapse of the housing market – does not pick up the dollar could be further imperiled.</p>
<p>Weakness in the dollar will also be affected by the Fed’s withdrawal of liquidity, which is likely to proceed at a gradual pace.</p>
<p>Finally, diversification away from the dollar among the world’s central banks is taking place, albeit at a slower pace than many analysts have suggested, and that too, is weakening the dollar.</p>
<p>Let’s concede that there is no currency that could supplant the dollar as the world’s major reserve currency. So, it’s unlikely that the world’s central banks will simply abandon the dollar anytime soon. However, we must also acknowledge that a reduction in the weightings of the U.S. dollar within central bank reserves is already underway.</p>
<p>An <a href="http://www.euromoneyfix.com/Article.aspx?gi=32A54FDF-5DB0-4AD0-8A0E-91947484181A&amp;id=1695649&amp;ArticleID=2272771&amp;ls=week" target="_blank">Aug.  14 article by BNP Paribas currency strategist Ian Stannard in <strong><em>Euromoney</em></strong></a> recently described this gradual shift in currency reserves.  The article noted that only 62.5% of global currency reserves are in U.S. dollars, down from about 66% in 2005.</p>
<p>So I do not anticipate a sudden shift in central bank reserves, but rather a continuation of the measured restructuring we’ve seen so far. Thus, the slow weakening trend in the U.S. dollar is likely to continue.</p>
<p>So, in this very uncertain investment scenario, I prefer to go for more secure returns in bonds.  And we can achieve great diversification at a cheap cost with the <strong>iShares iBoxx $  Investment Grade Corporate Bond Fund</strong><strong> </strong><strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=lqd" target="_blank">LQD</a>).</strong></p>
<p>For starters, its weighted average coupon of 6.26% offers a current yield slightly north of 6% at today’s prices.  Investors are assuming interest rate risk, which means that if interest rates climb, the value of the bond has to come down.  But in the short term, there is no immediate threat of inflation.</p>
<p>Looking at the major holdings of the fund – which has no single position that accounts for more than 1.26% of its total holdings – I see some names that have demonstrated continued stability and others that have shown recent signs of improvement, such as <strong>American Express  Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AAXP" target="_blank">AXP</a>)</strong>.  So I do not expect any major credit spread hiccup here.  I certainly do not see any hiccup that a 6.26% coupon would not compensate for.</p>
<p>For an additional hedge against dollar weakness, I suggest  you revisit my June 8 recommendation of the <strong>iShares SPDR Gold Trust ETF</strong> <strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=gld" target="_blank">GLD</a>). </strong>You may also consider buying a bit of the <strong>PowerShares DB US Dollar  Index Bearish (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=PowerShares+DB+US+Dollar+Index+Bearish+" target="_blank">UDN</a>)</strong> fund.  Do not go overboard. Err on being light, rather than heavy on  hedging, since timing currency moves is very difficult.</p>
<p><strong>Recommendation: buy</strong> <strong>iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond Fund</strong><strong> </strong><strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=lqd" target="_blank">LQD</a>) at market.  Consider hedging  part of the US dollar risk by buying the</strong> <strong>iShares SPDR  Gold Trust ETF</strong> <strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=gld" target="_blank">GLD</a>) </strong><strong>and  PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bearish (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=PowerShares+DB+US+Dollar+Index+Bearish+" target="_blank">UDN</a>)</strong>. <strong>Both funds should account for a fraction of your position.  Have a 5%  stop loss on UDN (**).</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/08/24/ishares-iboxx/"><br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/08/24/ishares-iboxx/">Source: Buy, Sell or Hold: The iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond Fund</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/buy-sell-or-hold-the-ishares-iboxx-investment-grade-corporate-bond-fund/20113/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The iShares Barclays TIPS Bond Fund is a Good Way to Brace for Imminent Inflation</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-ishares-barclays-tips-bond-fund-is-a-good-way-to-brace-for-imminent-inflation/18728</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-ishares-barclays-tips-bond-fund-is-a-good-way-to-brace-for-imminent-inflation/18728#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Horacio Marquez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bond Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horacio Marquez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Rate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<p>It is high time for our political leaders to make some key decisions.  And that translates into large uncertainties for investors that have held the market in a range and with low volume. We do not know whether “<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cap_and_trade" target="_blank">Cap and Trade</a>” legislation will pass the Senate and we do not know whether and any healthcare bill will pass through Congress, or what that bill might entail.  And these two issues are paramount for the future of America.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/29/tsw-claymore-tax-advantaged-balanced-fund/" target="_blank">As we discussed earlier</a>, cap and trade could cause incremental costs in energy for all of the United States, particularly in all carbon-based generation of electricity.  Increasing these costs will make carbon-based energy less competitive with alternative sources, like solar and nuclear.  The benefits&#8230;</p></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<p>It is high time for our political leaders to make some key decisions.  And that translates into large uncertainties for investors that have held the market in a range and with low volume. We do not know whether “<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cap_and_trade" target="_blank">Cap and Trade</a>” legislation will pass the Senate and we do not know whether and any healthcare bill will pass through Congress, or what that bill might entail.  And these two issues are paramount for the future of America.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/29/tsw-claymore-tax-advantaged-balanced-fund/" target="_blank">As we discussed earlier</a>, cap and trade could cause incremental costs in energy for all of the United States, particularly in all carbon-based generation of electricity.  Increasing these costs will make carbon-based energy less competitive with alternative sources, like solar and nuclear.  The benefits of this legislation will be less carbon emissions, cleaner air, less dependence on imported oil and the <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/29/jobless-recovery-3/" target="_blank">creation of new jobs in the alternative energy sector</a>.</p>
<p>However, this all comes at the expense of jobs in the traditional energy sector, which is currently the backbone of our energy policy. It also means higher job losses in the rest of the economy due to higher energy costs.  Remember that the United States is the “Saudi Arabia of coal,” given its abundance here.</p>
<p>All of these uncertainties are huge, as are the stakes for a multitude of sectors.  I have been surprised by the unpredictable decisions of our legislators many times.  In addition, legislative add-ons that tack hundreds of pages onto a bill right before it comes to a vote make prior analysis nearly impossible.  Therefore, unless the outcome is almost a foregone conclusion and the details are clearly spelled out well beforehand, making strong bets on their legislative outcomes is just plain gambling.</p>
<p>The unemployment rate rose to 9.5% in June as the economy shed 467,00 jobs. That’s up from 322,000 in May.  Jobs are a lagging indicator and tend to peak well after the economy has peaked.  But they are the best coincident indicator of economic activity.</p>
<p>Warren Buffet recently said that he has not yet seen any green shoots in the economy.  Conversely, <strong>General Electric Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=ge" target="_blank">GE</a>)</strong> Chief Executive Officer <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/officerProfile?symbol=GE.N&amp;officerId=28187" target="_blank">Jeffery Immelt</a> said that all the pieces are in place for a recovery in the United States.  Yet the only areas of strength he mentioned were abroad:  China, some areas of the Middle East and other emerging economies.</p>
<p>But what we can all agree on right now is that there is no inflation in sight, despite the massive amounts of quantitative easing from the U.S. Federal Reserve.  But it won’t be long before inflation does rear its ugly head.</p>
<p>Like the people in Germany who were deeply affected by hyperinflation, I remember living and analyzing companies in Argentina in the 80s with inflation rising at a rate of 1% a day.  It was not fun, and the distortions to economic activity and financial statements were amazing.</p>
<p>Although the Fed has repeatedly indicated that it is ready to remove the monetary stimuli at the appropriate moment in an aggressive-enough fashion so as to preclude an inflationary spike, neither we can be sure that the central bank’s actions will meet with immediate success.</p>
<p>Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke is very capable and his resolve gives me comfort, but as former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan told us when he was running the central bank, there are important variables in monetary policy that the Fed cannot know for sure: Among them are the lags between the Fed’s actions and the response in the economy and the precise sensitivity of the economy’s response to the Fed’s actions.  It is like steering a large transatlantic ship while watching in the rearview mirror.  By the time you <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanic" target="_blank">see an iceberg</a>, the ability to reverse or alter the course is very limited.</p>
<p>If we observe that the level of both monetary and fiscal intervention in the economy is at historic highs, then we have to understand that applying the just doses of intervention and reducing those doses as the economy gains a “self-sustaining” pace is a very tricky exercise.  Even allowing for the best of intentions and the immaculate professional abilities of the Fed, this will be a very difficult task to pull off.  And what is self-sustaining growth, anyhow?</p>
<p>We also need to understand that the current reflationary policy, which was employed to prevent the country from falling into a deflationary spiral, is actually seeking to create a little inflation.  And it would be unpardonable to see the country fall back into a double-dip recession after all this intervention, should the Fed pull on the reins too soon.</p>
<p>In fact, the Fed and the Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner have repeatedly led us to believe that they intend to see the recovery ingrained before withdrawing significant amounts of stimuli.  It makes all the sense in the world.  The logical implication is that they would rather see an unpleasant reading or two on the inflation front than see an unpleasant reading on the growth side.  It is a very difficult situation to manage and they are not perfect.</p>
<p>So right now, when inflation expectations are well subdued, it is a good idea to add a position in Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS).  The easy way of doing this is by buying the <strong>iShares Barclays TIPS Bond Fund (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=TIP" target="_blank">TIP</a>)</strong>.</p>
<p>All of these pending uncertainties that I mentioned are adding to the traditional summer doldrums and we are seeing very low stock trading volumes.  So we are going to take advantage of the situation to get a good valuation on these bonds well before inflation expectations pick up.</p>
<p>Also, adding bonds to the portfolio has a stabilizing effect.  And the two traditional worries with bonds: A drop in the value of the U.S. Dollar and an increase in inflation are actually hedged, at least in part, with TIPS.  Because inflation is fully hedged as the principal is indexed by the consumer price index (CPI) index.</p>
<p><strong>Recommendation:</strong> <strong>iShares Barclays TIPS Bond Fund (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=TIP" target="_blank">TIP</a>)</strong><strong>at market<strong> (**)</strong>.</strong><br />
<strong>(**) - Special Note of Disclosure</strong>: Horacio Marquez holds no interest in the iShares Barclays TIPS Bond Fund.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-ishares-barclays-tips-bond-fund-is-a-good-way-to-brace-for-imminent-inflation/18728/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Fed Bailouts Are Good News for This Inverse Bond Fund</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/why-fed-bailouts-are-good-news-for-this-inverse-bond-fund/5493</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/why-fed-bailouts-are-good-news-for-this-inverse-bond-fund/5493#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Hutchinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benchmark Interest Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bond Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Price Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Price Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Easy Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed Rate Cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Funds Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hutchinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Index Cpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation Worries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Hutchinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Price Stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rydex Juno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RYJUX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upward March]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Inflation Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/why-fed-bailouts-are-good-news-for-this-inverse-bond-fund/5493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Despite the chaos on Wall Street, the Fed yesterday left its benchmark interest rate on hold at 2%.</p>
<p><strong>Martin Hutchinson </strong>says the Fed has finally starting doing its job: putting price stability over Wall Street&#8217;s demands. Real interest rates are negative. This is feeding inflation. It also means Treasury bond yields &#8211; also currently below the rate of inflation &#8211; are too low and should begin to rise again.</p>
<p>Martin says investors can profit from this situation with the <strong>Rydex Juno Inverse Government Long Bond Strategy</strong> (MUTF:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=RYJUX&#38;hl=en">RYJUX</a>).</p>
<p>More from Martin in <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links">Money Morning</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="entry">The statement that was issued after the policymaking meeting was somewhat “hawkish,” suggesting that the U.S. Federal Reserve is awakening to the dangers of persistent and gently rising inflation.</p>
<p class="entry"> Wall Street was initially&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite the chaos on Wall Street, the Fed yesterday left its benchmark interest rate on hold at 2%.</p>
<p><strong>Martin Hutchinson </strong>says the Fed has finally starting doing its job: putting price stability over Wall Street&#8217;s demands. Real interest rates are negative. This is feeding inflation. It also means Treasury bond yields &#8211; also currently below the rate of inflation &#8211; are too low and should begin to rise again.</p>
<p>Martin says investors can profit from this situation with the <strong>Rydex Juno Inverse Government Long Bond Strategy</strong> (MUTF:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=RYJUX&amp;hl=en">RYJUX</a>).</p>
<p>More from Martin in <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links">Money Morning</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="entry">The statement that was issued after the policymaking meeting was somewhat “hawkish,” suggesting that the U.S. Federal Reserve is awakening to the dangers of persistent and gently rising inflation.</p>
<p class="entry"> Wall Street was initially spooked: it had hoped for the usual bounce that follows a Fed rate cut. However, investors subsequently decided the Fed’s inaction meant things weren’t so bad after all. Actually, the inaction was the first example in several years of the Fed doing its job – standing up to the easy-money politicians and Wall Street in the pursuit of lower inflation.</p>
<p>The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&amp;sid=aEYrh0.ZZWFM&amp;refer=economy">August  registered a decline</a> in prices of 0.1%, which observers hailed as an indication that inflation worries are at an end. But don’t you believe a word of it; the decline was entirely due to the recent fall in oil prices, which we here at Money Morning expect will one day reverse course and resume their upward march. The only question is when that will happen and what the catalyst will be to make it so.</p>
<p>In terms of the CPI, the “real” consumer price inflation was actually 5.4% over the past 12 months, which makes the 2.0% Federal Funds rate look pretty silly.</p>
<p>The same is true all over the world: Inflation rates are either well above the local bank base rates (2.3% vs. 0.5% in Japan, 12.1% vs. 9.0% in India), or are only just below them (3.8% vs. 4.25% in the Eurozone, 4.8% vs. 5.0% in Britain). Only China has inflation of 4.8% to go against a bank rate of 7.2% &#8211; <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/09/16/central-banks/">just reduced from  7.47%</a> &#8211; but China had been holding prices down with direct controls for the Summer Olympic Games, so its current inflation number is pretty dodgy.</p>
<p>If interest rates are at or below the inflation rate in most of the world, then it follows that global monetary policy is expansionary and inflation can be expected to increase generally.</p>
<p>You can’t entirely blame the world’s central banks; we have been in a credit crunch for more than a year now, and investment banks the size of <strong>Lehman Brothers</strong> (NYSE:LEH) and <strong>Merrill Lynch </strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mer&amp;hl=en">MER</a>) getting in trouble is a pretty good indication that all is not well. However, there’s also no denying that low or negative real interest rates will tend to produce an acceleration of inflation.</p>
<p>The two objectives &#8211; saving the world banking system, and  keeping inflation under control &#8211; are in conflict.</p>
<p>The market demonstrates the solution to the conflict.</p>
<p>On Monday the Federal Funds rate traded for much of the day at 6.0%, versus the Fed’s target of 2.0%. To get the market Federal Funds rate down towards the target, the Fed needed to inject lots of liquidity, which it did &#8211; to the tune of about $70 billion.</p>
<p>That liquidity increased the money supply, but only to make up for the decrease caused by bank failures and market fear, thus restoring the market’s balance and lowering the Federal Funds rate to about 3.0% by the end of the day’s trading. An interest rate cut Tuesday would simply have moved the “target” Federal Funds rate, rather than the actual rate, and would have led to more inflationary pressures without materially helping the banking system.</p>
<p>Indeed, one can wish that the Fed had confined itself to injecting liquidity throughout this prolonged credit crunch, keeping the Federal Funds rate level at its September 2007 level of 5.25%. In that case oil prices would probably never have soared to $147 a barrel, and U.S. inflation might have remained safely around 3.0%.</p>
<p>Going forward, it seems clear that next time the FOMC meets without having had about half of Wall Street disappear in the preceding week (the next scheduled meeting is Oct. 28-29), it will be tempted to announce a modest interest-rate rise, unless the U.S. economy is truly in the tank by then. Of course, the Fed would remain ready to lower rates again if a deep recession appeared, or to inject liquidity if more banks got in trouble.</p>
<p>That would suggest that the current sharp drop in yields on long Treasury bonds has been overdone (from 4.25% in June to 3.25% yesterday (Tuesday) morning, before rebounding to 3.49% at yesterday’s close). Thus, a rebound in Treasury bond yield – taking them significantly above the level of inflation – is called for as money is tightened and the Federal Funds rate rises.</p>
<p>To take advantage of such a yield rebound,  you should consider the <strong>Rydex Juno Inverse Government Long Bond Strategy</strong> (MUTF:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=RYJUX&amp;hl=en">RYJUX</a>). This  invests in short futures contracts on long-term Treasuries. It can be  expected to gain as Treasury yields rise.</p></blockquote>
<p>Source:  	  <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/09/17/us-federal-reserve-2/">Federal Reserve Policymakers Stand Up to Wall Street’s  Easy-Money Crowd</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/why-fed-bailouts-are-good-news-for-this-inverse-bond-fund/5493/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.884 seconds -->
