And with good reason. The United States has a bigger and more-troubled financial sector than most countries. It also has a bigger overhang from the housing bubble, has a bigger balance-of-payments deficit and has a budget deficit that’s fat enough to stall the recovery.

It would be nice to have an economic recovery to invest in that didn’t have all of these problems.

Truth be told, such an investment play does exist. What’s more, the market I have in mind is advanced enough for us to invest in it without having to go through all the rigmarole of American Depository Receipt (ADR) investing. Nor will you have to make a potentially risky foray out onto some foreign stock exchange to buy the shares, because they are almost all listed here.

The country I’m talking about is Canada. Think of it as being like home – but without the problems that our home market (the United States) currently suffers from.

Our Healthy Neighbor to the North

When the recession struck, Canada was hit by it quite badly, but for different reasons from its southern neighbor. The Canadian housing market was nowhere near as overheated as its U.S. counterpart. So Canada’s housing downturn wasn’t as deep.

And what about the banking systems? To be sure, Canadian banks received a bailout, but it was less than $20 billion in total. Compare that to the veritable alphabet soup of U.S. bailout programs ranging from “TARP” and “TALF” that have injected more than $2 trillion into the U.S. financial system.

On the other hand, natural resources prices crashed last autumn, which had a major effect on Canada’s resource-based economy. A number of large projects in the Athabasca Tar Sands region were cancelled, for example – since this region has oil reserves around the size of the entire Middle East, its development is crucial to Canada’s future.

The “loonie,” Canada’s currency, declined from around “parity” to the U.S. dollar to an exchange ratio of C$1.30=$1 U.S. In effect, this was a “flight to safety” into the dollar and U.S. Treasuries. And it affected Canada as it did other countries.

In 2009, however, Canada and the United States have traveled down totally different paths. Canada did very little “stimulus,” so its state budget is in much better shape. The deficit for the 2009-2010 fiscal year $53 billion (C$56 billion) is only about 4% of gross domestic product (GDP). For the 2010-2011 fiscal year, the deficit is expected to be about $42 billion (C$45 billion), or 3.2% of GDP.

Energy Powers the Rally

The bounce in natural resources prices has really helped power up the rebound of Canada’s market.

Investment in the tar-sands region has picked up again, with a big merger between the two largest tar-sands-extraction companies: Suncor Energy Inc. (NYSE: SU) and Petro-Canada. The rising gold price hasn’t hurt either – mines are appearing all over the place! All this new activity has made the loonie bounce, so it’s back to about C$1.07=$1. While interest rates are as low as the United States, the Bank of Canada hasn’t done much “quantitative easing,” meaning that inflation isn’t too much of a worry.

The strong loonie helps here, too.

Canada seems to be recovering nicely. Its index of leading indicators jumped 1.1% in August, while manufacturing sales grew 5.5% in July. The country presently runs a modest current account deficit, but it’s only 2% of GDP. That’s much lower than even the current U.S. deficit, let alone that of 2007. It had a little more public debt than the United States in 2008, but given current U.S. deficits, those two lines almost certainly have crossed by now.

There are two caveats. The first is an obvious one: If commodity prices crash to earth, Canada will have some difficulty because commodities are a large part of its economy. Personally, I don’t see that happening. It’s notable that PetroChina Co. Ltd. (NYSE ADR: PTR) has just invested $1.7 billion in a Canadian tar sands project, so China must not think so, either.

The other risk is political. The current minority Conservative government of Stephen Harper has done a good job, but the opposition Liberals have withdrawn their parliamentary support. That means there may be an election this autumn. A Liberal majority government would be no disaster. They might be a bit sticky about oil-drilling permits, but would not otherwise rock the boat.

However, a Liberal coalition with the leftist New Democrats could push public spending and the deficit up, and there’s no guarantee against that. (One of the problems with multi-party systems like Canada’s is there is an almost infinite variety of possible governments after each election, some of which can be fairly alarming from a business perspective.)

However, Canadian elections are a much smaller risk than you get in most countries, and the commodity/oil price crash, if it happened, would help the U.S. economy and, presumably, your U.S. portfolio. So it’s worth having some Canadian exposure, perhaps with the Canadian market exchange traded fund (ETF) iShare MSCI Canada Index (NYSE: EWC).

For years it was almost fashionable to dismiss Canada from an economic standpoint. Now, however, that may well be where the smart money would like to go. As an economy, Canada is competent and stable.

It’s the kind of country that looks to be a good place for some of our money.

The trip was sponsored by the American Petroleum Institute (API), which paid for the airfare and accommodations. Managers at both Syncrude and ConocoPhillips granted me access to any parts of their operations I wanted to see (within allowances for safety). And everyone answered any and all questions I asked.

Post-trip, I have complete editorial freedom to write about what I saw and learned. And I learned a lot. So this is Part I of a two-part series. Watch for Part II.

The Past and Future of Oil and Oil Sands

The first thing that struck me about visiting the oil sands of Alberta was how much geological and social similarity there is to the oil patch of Pennsylvania.

Geologic similarity? Yes, because the reason that the hydrocarbons are so near the surface in both areas — Pennsylvania and Alberta — is that the Pleistocene glaciers scraped off much of the overlying rock. When the glaciers retreated about 10,000 years ago, they left hydrocarbon-bearing rock formations exposed near the surface, or buried not too deep. This led to oil seeps, which led to people being curious about the black, gooey stuff.

To be sure, the hydrocarbon resource is quite different between the two places. That is, in Pennsylvania, you have light, sweet crude oil that flows easily and is soft and smooth to the touch. Indeed, Pennsylvania crude feels like hand lotion. (It’s the origin of Vaseline, for example. And some people use it as the basis for a shampoo.)

While in Alberta, the “bitumen” from the oil sands is as thick as cold molasses, and very sticky. It’s got some sulfur in it as well.

On a warm day in August, oil sands have the consistency of really stiff, dry oatmeal. Bitumen is a far cry from hand lotion.

And as for social similarities? Well, the Indians of old used to skim the oil from streams near Titusville, Pa. So did people of the “First Nations” of Alberta, who used to recover the tarry bitumen from the rocks along the Athabaska River of northern Alberta. Thus both oil and oil sands have been around for a long, long time.

Early white explorers in both Pennsylvania and Alberta noted the oil seeps. They wrote in journals and logs that eventually somebody could do something with the substance.

Eventually, both Pennsylvania and Alberta had their oil booms. In fact, we’re soon coming up on the 150th anniversary of Col. Drake’s oil discovery at Titusville, Pa, on Aug. 27, 1859. Pennsylvania’s oil boom is colorful history at this point (although Marcellus Shale development will soon change that).

Whereas Alberta is still in the midst of its oil sands boom. It’s a boom that’s going to last for quite some time, I believe.

“Easy” Oil Versus Heavy Oil and Bitumen

There’s a reason Col. Drake started an oil boom in Pennsylvania more than a century before Alberta enjoyed the same thing. Col. Drake found some of that so-called “easy” oil. No, it’s not easy to find. It’s that Col. Drake’s oil flows easily from a well.

That is, for all the oil that mankind has pumped out of the ground in the past 15 decades, almost all of it has been the light, sweet stuff that flows easily. Generally, when people looked for oil they bypassed the heavy oil and bitumen. Until lately, of course.

When we think about the concept of “Peak Oil” today, we need to keep in mind what we’re talking about. The curves show oil output peaking in so many parts of the world. This phenomenon is quite real, as long as you understand that it’s the “old fashioned” kind of oil deposit that Col. Drake was drilling. The light, sweet, easy-flowing oil is getting harder and harder to find, certainly in significant quantity.

But there are a lot of other hydrocarbon molecules out there. Most of those molecules are not light, sweet crude oil. Indeed, most of the hydrocarbon molecules that the world will use in the future will be “heavy,” with lots of carbon atoms and not so many hydrogen atoms.

Here’s a graph from oil services giant Schlumberger that estimates the world’s heavy oil and bitumen resources. Canada’s 400 billion cubic meters of bitumen translates into something like 1.4 trillion barrels of oil equivalent. How much is that? Well, it’s about SEVEN times the total oil reserves of Saudi Arabia.

It just so happens that most of that Canadian bitumen is located in Alberta (with some is in Saskatchewan). And Fort McMurray, about 250 miles north of Edmonton, is the heart of the development process.

Oil Sands — Surface Mining

Large-scale oil sands development began in the 1970s. It took gigantic levels of capital investment, like tens of billions of dollars. That’s not pocket change. So a group of lease-owners got together and pooled their capital to form privately held Syncrude Canada, a joint venture. First mining started in 1978.

The way Syncrude operates, it’s not really “mining.” It’s landscape architecture. Under Alberta law, Syncrude could not turn over its first shovel of rock without a master plan for remediation and restoration at the end of the cycle. It’s quite a farsighted model for long-range resource development.

Thus for much of the 1970s, Syncrude performed baseline environmental studies and data gathering. It started digging in 1978. At first, the pit looked like a moonscape of open-pit mining. See the photo below. It looks like a mess, right? Well, there’s more to the story.

The mining process is fairly straightforward. Big shovels (really big) scoop large volumes (really large) of oil-laden sand (API number 8, the “bitumen”) into gigantic loaders (and I mean gigantic.

The loaders haul the rock to a crusher. The crushed rock goes to a washing bin, kind of like your washing machine at home except it’s the size of a high-rise office building. The Syncrude operation washes the bitumen off the sand using naphtha. Then it separates the bitumen, recovers the naphtha for reuse and takes the clean sand (and it’s clean) and replaces it in a previously mined pit.

The process uses a lot of water, but not as much as the horror stories you might hear about “draining the rivers” of northern Canada. Each barrel of water is recycled about 18 times.

The process uses a large amount of natural gas, but not as much as you may have heard (like “all the natural gas of northern Canada”). Pretty much everything about the operation is built with cogeneration in mind, so the company continuously recovers the heat at each stage. That natural gas goes a long way, from what I saw.

If it takes, say, five years to dig a pit, and then it may take five or more years to fill it back up with sand during the restoration process. Syncrude’s goal is to handle the rock as little as possible.

Eventually, Syncrude returns the land to original grade, although the company has some artistic license with the contours. It covers the land with the original topsoil, which has been in cold storage (northern Alberta… it’s cold up here for 10 months of the year). Then it replants trees, and that’s saying something, because the growing season is under two months. It takes 80 years for your basic spruce tree to reach maturity.

There’s even a new water table, despite the disturbance of the land.

Where Things Now Stand

So at this stage, after 30 years or so of mining (with about 80 years to go, at current rates of extraction), Syncrude has come to a point of delivering 350,000 barrels of synthetic crude oil per day. It takes the 8-API bitumen and upgrades it to oil that’s competitive with West Texas Light. Then it delivers it to the JV members, for whatever use the owners want to make of it.

Along the way, the Syncrude process removes the sulfur, so it’s sulfur free (refiners like that). In fact, there’s a mass of sulfur up at Syncrude that’s about the size of the step pyramid at Saqqara, Egypt. And along the way, Syncrude sells the sulfur to the chemical industry.

The former Syncrude mine that I visited is about 3.5 miles square, and formerly about 200 feet deep. Now it’s restored to grade, with trees growing and a herd of 300 wood bison grazing.

For the cynics out there, I’d say that it’s not some environmental Potemkin village, because you can’t fake a replanted forest of 25-year-old trees. You can’t fake a 300-bison herd. Not on a former mine site 3.5 miles square.

Sure, there are still issues about land disturbance, settling ponds, water usage, gas usage and myriad of other things that come up when you’re spending billions of dollars on a major mining effort. But Syncrude has built its business model around dealing with the “other” issues, and not just moving oil sands and recovering oil products. Don’t underestimate the ability of the Alberta government to regulate its energy producers. This is a long way from Appalachia.

Meanwhile, we’re talking about literally billions of barrels of bitumen (or oil equivalent) that the process makes available to the North American marketplace. And if the U.S. wants to get onto its environmental high horse about the source of the hydrocarbons from the oil sands — and tax or ban their importation — there are other buyers in the world. Like the Chinese, who have racked up many frequent flyer miles on their treks to Fort McMurray.

That’s all for now. In Part II, I’ll discuss the in situ process that I saw at the ConocoPhillips Surmont site.

Until we meet again,
Byron King

Source: Update on Canada Oil Sands, Part I

Inflation is up significantly from the 1.7% increase reported in April, Statistics Canada reported yesterday (Thursday). And high gas prices are to blame as fuel costs rose 15.0% in May compared with the same month last year – that’s considerably faster than the 12-month change of 11.6% posted in April.

Excluding gasoline prices, 12-month inflation grew 1.6% in May.

Last week, the central bank voted to keep its overnight interest rate at 3%, warning that inflation risks have “shifted slightly to the upside.” But the bank quickly followed that up by saying global demand for Canadian goods and services remains strong despite a U.S. slowdown.

“This report will not push the bank to raise rates in 2008, but we do see 100 basis points of hikes coming in 2009 as Canada’s inflation problem heats up,” Meny Grauman, an economist with CIBC World Markets Inc. in Toronto, said in a note to clients, Bloomberg News reported.

With an end to the rate cuts, the Canadian dollar is on the rise. The loonie has gained 1% since the June 10 decision to hold rates steady, Bloomberg reported.

Recession Protection?

Earlier this month, Canada announced its gross domestic product (GDP) shrank 0.1% in the first quarter, marking the country’s first decline since the second quarter of 2003.

But this is where inflation could actually be a friend.

In today’s world, where interest rates are low and commodity prices are high, Canada’s in a very strong position for two reasons:

• It has oil reserves – somewhat larger than the Middle East – in the form of the Athabasca oil sands.

• And it’s the world’s largest producer of uranium, with 25% of the world market. (Australia is a close second, with about 23%.)

Since Canada is a chief oil exporter, its oil companies are on the receiving end of soaring prices. And in turn, that helps pad the economy’s pocket, becoming an unlikely protective barrier to another quarter of negative GDP growth.

Also working in the economy’s favor, month-to-month wholesale sales jumped 1.4% in April, more than doubling forecasts of 0.6%, Reuters reported. This suggests that domestic demand is able to wade through inflationary waters and lends credence to justifying a future interest rate hike.

The Bank of Canada’s next scheduled date for announcing the overnight rate target is July 15.

Source: Can Inflation Save Canada from Recession?

Today, 88 businesses qualify for this exemption under the government’s rules. They are all publicly traded. The government calls these stocks “master limited partnerships” (MLPs) or “publicly traded partnerships” (PTPs).

Eighty-five percent of MLPs are in the energy business. Two-thirds of these energy companies operate pipelines. The rest run miscellaneous “midstream” energy businesses – things like refining, compressing, pumping, and field gathering. Only 15% of MLPs are outside the energy sector.

You likely know several MLPs already. Kinder Morgan used to be part of Enron. It’s an MLP. And though you’ve probably heard of Blackstone Group and its private-equity operations, you may not know Blackstone is also structured as an MLP. Carl Icahn’s business – Icahn Enterprises – is an MLP, too. (For a full list of MLPs, see the website of the National Association of Publicly Traded Partnerships at www.naptp.org.)

I like MLPs as an investment. One of the secrets of income investing is avoiding tax. When you avoid tax, you generate higher returns without taking on more risk. Besides, MLPs invest in infrastructure. The population of the United States grows every year. Population growth supports 8% average annual MLP market growth.

But here’s the thing: I think MLPs are going to beat almost all other income investments over the next two years for another reason altogether:

Canada.

The income-trust market in Canada is almost identical to the MLP sector in the United States. Canadian income trusts pay no tax, they distribute all their earnings in dividends, and they operate mostly in the commodity and energy sectors.

In other words, MLPs compete directly with Canadian income trusts for investment.

Millions of income investors, pension funds, retirees, and other dividend hogs have enjoyed these trusts’ high dividends over the last 20 years.

But on October 31, 2006, the Canadian government changed the law. It ended the Canadian income-trust structure. Existing trusts have until January 1, 2011 to convert back to corporations, begin paying corporate taxes again, and cut their dividends.

MLPs are the perfect substitute. Yield hogs will turn their attention to MLPs as the 2011 deadline approaches.

Right now, MLPs are paying 7.4%. A 10-year Treasury note pays only 4%. The “spread,” or difference, is 3.4%. This spread is the largest it’s been in five years. That means MLPs are as cheap as they’ve been since 2003.

North American Pipeline MLP Yields Versus
10-Year Treasury Bonds

If nothing changes, MLPs will keep generating 7.4% dividend yields. Add that to 8% industry growth, and we’ll make total annual returns of 16% – matching returns of the last 18 years.

But when you take into account the demise of the Canadian income trusts… I think MLP investors could easily see 25% annual returns over the next couple of years.

Good investing,

Tom

P.S. I’ve found the best way to invest in MLPs. It’s a basket of these investments, it pays a 6.5% dividend yield… and you can buy it at a discount to its net asset value. Here’s something else: You won’t have to worry about tax paperwork associated with MLPs because the SEC considers this investment a regular stock for tax purposes…

I recently published a report on this investment for readers of my advisory The 12% Letter. Click here to learn more about The 12% Letter.

Source: Canada’s Loss Will Make These U.S. Stocks Soar

But there are others who believe in the “Peak Oil” argument, the ultimate end-game, like a Suburban crushing a Subaru at the end of a long hill. Peak Oil enthusiasts will point to long lists of numbers, detailed maps of known reserves, past prognosticators of genius, and declare with tinfoil-hat fervor that “we are running out of oil.”

I’ve read these books and listened to the speeches. The idea that there is a finite amount of oil on the planet, and we are near the point where we will extract less in the next hundred years than we did in the past. Makes sense to me, as does the business cycle. I don’t know if the hundred-year history of the oil cycle is over. There is always a “this time it’s different” ideology at the peak. But then again, sometimes, it is different.

What we do know — what isn’t in dispute — is that oil is expensive, and that by all accounts the easy oil has already been found and is being extracted at a furious pace.

And this has led the industrial countries on a desperate search for this ever-scarcer commodity.

Russia, China, India, Brazil, Canada, Europe and the U.S. are fighting an anxious and diminishing struggle for the last of the world’s hydrocarbons. Russia is sending submarines to plant national flags at the bottom of the Arctic Ocean. China has moved aggressively to acquire oil holdings from Kazakhstan to Somalia. India has gotten in bed with the genocidal regime of the Sudan to the tune a $45 billion natural gas pipeline. The U.S. is spending trillions in treasury and thousands in lives to make sure the oil flows from the Middle East.

The Guardian of UK fame recently reported that “money is no object as the big players grab what is left of a diminishing resource.” (This was after China’s Sinopec paid $1 billion for the right to explore for oil in deep water off Angola.) Just a few years ago, such a deal would have sold for a mere $35 million. But competition is fierce over the last remaining frontiers where vast quantities of oil might be found.

If you add Latin American governments and Russia’s success at renationalized oil and gas assets, and the fact that many reserves in the Middle East are off-limits… you have a situation where the oil majors are going to the politically difficult and geographically inhospitable locations to find oil.

The oil game isn’t over by a long shot. One successful investment strategy is to find oil assets selling on the cheap and buy them before the big players show up.

I’ve discovered one such place off the cost of South America. For seven years a border dispute has stopped the drilling in what the United State Geological Survey (USGS) calls “the second-largest unexplored oil reserve in world.”

It’s a place we like to call the Gunboat Basin. It’s about 100 miles off South America’s coast. The USGS estimates that this oil basin contains 15 billion barrels of oil as well as 42 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. This location is one of the most sought-after oil regions on the planet. Not only is it a strategic replacement to Venezuela, but it is also brimming with precious crude. Only one problem: For the last seven years, the oil has been locked down and under armed guard!

But over the summer, the United Nations was able to hand down a ruling that averted a war and will benefit all parties. As I write this, seismic explorer vessels are on their way. Exxon Mobil and other large oil companies have formed partnerships.

There is a perfect way to play this which involves one small $3 company that owns the offshore rights. To protect my paying subscribers of Crisis Trader, I cannot reveal the name of this micro-cap explorer that trades on the Toronto Venture Exchange. However, it does show you how persistent research can turn up the kind of companies long overlooked by Wall Street — that can make investors a handsome return.

This $3 company is a Canada-based oil and gas explorer with an interest in 9.8 million acres (7.7 million net) offshore Guyana, South America, an area ranked second among the world’s under-explored basins. Exploration in the basin has been deferred by each of the offshore operators — Exxon and Repsol — as well as this $3 company which had been forced off its Eagle location by Surinamese gunboats in June 2000.

This tiny oil and gas exploration company has funded $8.9 million, the majority of Guyana’s legal expense, for resolution of the maritime border with Suriname by the International Tribunal on Law of the Sea. Oral hearings were first heard in December 2006 and a binding decision on the maritime border was established by the U.N. on September 20, 2007.

It has been agreed to by both Guyana and Suriname. Furthermore, it favors the holdings of this company that I had recommended to my readers. Guyana is preparing for renewed exploration by each of the operators following resolution.

This little-known $3 company has identified many significant oil targets off the coast of Guyana. One stratigraphic trap called Eagle at 13,500 feet has an estimated resource potential of 610 million barrels. Even more interesting is a deeper region (18,000 feet), which is called Eagle Deep.

To the west of that, this tiny exploration company has identified several targets similar to the Eagle plays. This is a region in which this company has partnered with Repsol. Repsol is also the operator and has found a number of other targets.

Repsol, Occidental and Noble plan to drill two wells at an estimated cost of $100 million offshore Suriname, just to the east of and on trend with this company’s Corentyne prospecting license for offshore Guyana.

To the west, this company’s Pomeroon prospecting license showed two discoveries greater than 6 trillion cubic feet have been made offshore of Venezuela.

The CEO of the company has recently stated, “During the last year, [the company] has received a number of unsolicited expressions of interest from international oil and gas companies regarding the possibility of participating in the exploration of the Corentyne PPL, pending the resolution of the maritime border between Guyana and Suriname.”

As you can understand, in dealing with small-cap energy explorers in places such as Guyana and Venezuela, this is certainly qualifies a speculative play. So it’s not for the faint of heart. But the upside can be lucrative, with the stock more than doubling to $7 based on my conservative projections.

To me, that means it is a buyout candidate and is waiting for an offer it cannot refuse. Until that happens, it will explore its holdings and make announcements as to what it establishes. Each of these will be a catalyst for share price appreciation.

In many ways, this company is classic emerging-market energy play.

It has very little revenue as of yet. It holds a great deal of rights to a large oil field. Some of its holdings have been licensed out to major oil firms. Add it all up and this company is extremely undervalued based on its holdings. It’s exactly the kind of undiscovered gem you hope to find when making an energy play in emerging markets.

– Christian DeHaemer

Source: A Speculative Buy on the Second-Largest, Unexplored Oil Reserve in the World

According to Bloomberg, the project aims to extract about 8,000 metric tons of uranium octaoxide from the central province of Quang Nam.

“If coal is the short-term solution to the world’s energy needs, uranium is the long-term play,” says Jason Simpkins in Money Morning.

“In a recent research note, analysts with the RBC Capital Markets Group of the Royal Bank of Canada (RY) said that the current spot price of uranium has been ‘driven to excessively low levels due to intense selling pressure and lack of buying demand, coupled with the typical illiquidity of the spot market.’

“The RBC analysts also said that ‘the long-term price, on the other hand, has not changed since May 2007 and we think this better reflects the market’s view of longer-term supply-demand fundamentals.’

“If you want a pure play on an increase in the price of uranium itself, Cameco Corp. (CCJ) is your best shot. It’s the largest producer of uranium in North America and – despite flooding at its Cigar Lake site last year – Cameco remains the world’s largest and most liquid uranium miner, making it vital to the global supply.

“The company’s profit more than doubled in the first three months of 2008, surging 125% on its uranium and gold mining operations.”

Read on here to find out which blue-chip mining companies Jason thinks have maximum profit potential.

Doug Casey in Casey Research has picked up on some other Canadian uranium mining companies: “Hathor Exploration tagged a radioactive one on its 90% owned Midwest NorthEast uranium property in Saskatchewan. The latest drill results included 15 metres running an impressive 10.02% U308 in one hole and 10.06% U308 over 9 metres in another. Nice. Hathor ended the day up C$0.27 at C$3.05, while 10% carried interest holder Terra Ventures closed flat at C$0.75.”

When readers of my 12% Letter took their position in October 2006, Westshore sported an 11% dividend. Once the world caught on to the story, investors “chased the yield,” making Westshore behave like a growth stock. That pick returned 80% in the first 18 months.

Today I’m going to show you why Westshore was the perfect income play… and how you can spot the market’s best income investments. Let’s get started…

To qualify as a perfect income play, a company must 1) run a simple business, 2) be unable to expand its operation, 3) enjoy a huge “moat,” and 4) pay very little (if any) taxes. Here’s how Westshore measured up:

First, Westshore’s business couldn’t be simpler. The railroad brings the coal to Westshore’s Vancouver terminal. Westshore removes the coal from railroad hoppers, piles it up using a system of conveyor belts, and then reloads this coal onto ships. Westshore never owns the coal. It simply earns commissions from the coalmine it serves.

Simplicity is important because it’s easy to identify the risks in a simple business. All businesses carry risk, but if you can identify them, you can make a more accurate assessment of a company’s value.

Would you rather make a bid on a vast corporation with myriad operations and opaque accounting – say, Citigroup – or a coal terminal like Westshore? I always give more value to dividends from simple businesses than from complicated businesses.

———- Advertisement ———-
What do you know about “CHIMERICA?”

Harvard Business School calls CHIMERICA a “Fundamental Phenomenon… “

“It’s unlike anything I’ve ever seen,” said Paul Seaver, a money manager quoted in Barrons.

What can CHIMERICA do for you?

Click here for more details…
————————————

Second, Westshore has no way to expand its business. The terminal sits on the head of a spit in the waters south of Vancouver. The railroad tracks run around the perimeter of the spit. Westshore piles up the coal in the center of the spit. There are two docks, a pair of gantry cranes, a parking lot… and just enough room for a couple of prefabricated cabins where management runs the operation.

It may sound odd to say we’re looking for companies that can’t expand, since most investors are drawn to growth. But we’re not looking for growth. We’re looking for income. Expansion is a distraction… and often a big waste of money.

Businesses that can’t expand have the most focused management teams and pay the safest dividends. We want a company that pumps cash into its dividend, not its capital-expense budget.

Third, Westshore has a huge business moat, meaning there are significant barriers to competition. Westshore exports metallurgical coal. Forges use “met coal” to make steel. There is no substitute for Westshore’s coal. The world will always need steel… And the coalmine has enough coal to last for another century. A couple of other terminals export coal from western Canada. But they’re too small to make any dent in Westshore’s revenues.

We want a business that enjoys a wide moat. Moats protect castles from invaders. In business, moats protect dividends.

Finally, Westshore is an income trust. As long as these companies pay out all their earnings to shareholders, they don’t have to pay tax. Companies that don’t pay tax have more money to return to shareholders.

Of course, our Westshore position was a victim of its own success. The share price appreciated so much, its yield diminished and a modest price correction triggered our stop loss… As much as I love Westshore’s business, it’s still too expensive to leap back into today.

But you can find similar opportunities. Look for simple, straightforward businesses that pay few taxes, enjoy a healthy competitive advantage, and are unlikely to spend their money on anything but your dividends.

Good investing,

Tom

P.S. Westshore Terminals was my first pick in The 12% Letter, and it’s my best-performing so far.

Source: The Perfect Income Investment

As you might expect, the U.S housing slump is reducing demand for finished lumber. Meanwhile, timber, pulpwood, and paper prices are rising worldwide – but curiously, profit margins are eroding.

What’s up with that?

The global commodity boom has created a supply/demand price imbalance between the four distinct industry sectors that rely on timber as a raw material. In fact, that imbalance is a huge mismatch. And savvy investors may be able to wring substantial returns from the winner.

You see, timber companies have shrewdly maintained monopoly-like control of raw materials to hold the line on prices, despite the economic downturn. They are doling out enough – and only enough – supply to maintain sufficient revenue streams to pay the bills. Meanwhile, their downstream relatives are suffering.

In a sense, timber owners are weathering the storm. And when the storm is over, their profits should explode.

It’s a complicated scenario being driven by a number of economic factors including the declining U.S. dollar, classic market demand/supply ratios, emerging markets growth, and even export quotas and tariffs.

Investors who tune in may catch lightning in a bottle. The end game could send timber company profits – and your portfolio – soaring in the next 12 months to two years.

Let’s take a look.

Housing Slump Wreaks Havoc on Lumber Mills

As lumber prices have swooned to a five-year low, wood has been piling up at lumber mills. Sawmills throughout the United States and Canada have been reeling since the second quarter of 2007, when lumber prices collapsed to below the cost of production.

Here’s what’s happening now:

* In the United States, single-family-housing starts dropped 1.7% in April to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 692,000 units, the lowest monthly production rate since January 1991, and a jaw-dropping 42% below 2007.
* U.S lumber consumption is expected to drop, from 64 billion board feet to 43 billion board feet from 2006 to 2008. A drop of 21 billion board feet in the span of three years is simply staggering, equal to the total production of the Top 20 softwood lumber producers in the U.S. market for all of 2007.
* North American lumber at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange has fallen as low as $209 per thousand board feet, down a whopping 56% from its peak of $473 in 2004 – at the apex of the housing boom.
* Lumber companies in the Billion Board Foot Club, a measurement of the largest lumber companies in the world, was reduced from 22 to 15 in 2007. Six of the victims to be cut were in North America.

Particularly hard-hit are the big lumber mills in Canada, which ship much of their production to the United States. The key factor was the unprecedented run-up in the Canadian dollar. With sales denominated in U.S. dollars and costs accrued in Canadian dollars, a wide range of Canadian producers were running in the red and simply ran out of money.

In addition, Canada mills must pay a 15% duty to ship lumber into the United States. That puts the price at those mills at about $175 per thousand board feet, said Gerry Van Leeuwen, vice president at International Wood Markets Group, a Vancouver-based lumber consulting firm. “There is just no way anyone is making any money,” he added.

In the past, sawmills only needed to wait for interest rates to decline before ramping up production. Now, however, they will have to wait until the housing glut is over before lumber demand gets back to normal.

And that’s not likely until mid-2009 at the earliest. Our advice is not to bet the farm on lumber companies right now.
Global Growth Buoys Pulpwood and Paper Mills

Meanwhile, pulpwood and paper has been in a strong bull market for almost two years. Demand for paper and pulp remains strong – from overseas markets, in particular. And that demand doesn’t appear likely to ebb anytime, soon.’

Overall, world paper demand is moving ahead, buoyed by accelerating growth in Asia. The surge in paper demand in Asia is driving a huge appetite for both virgin pulp and recycled fiber. In 2006, alone, China’s imports of wood pulp jumped 150% to 7.5 million tons.

Increased exports have also helped pulpwood prices. The weak U.S. dollar makes it cheap enough for pulp and paper companies to purchase products in the United States and ship them overseas.

On top of that, demand from European utility companies for wood pellets should keep pulpwood prices elevated. Believe it or not, European utilities have turned to wood chips to produce power in order to lower their greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with the Kyoto protocol.

So you would think paper and pulpwood mills would be humming along, bringing in record profits.

Don’t make that bet.

The Big Squeeze

There is a huge fly in the ointment for pulpwood-and-paper mills.

Paper mills, of course, rely on pulpwood as raw material. Pulp mills, in turn, operate on small logs and wood chips – a byproduct of lumber production. And, as you might expect, the weak market has lumber mills cutting back on production. This is forcing pulpwood mills to rely on buying more logs or raw timber, says Daniel Stuber, of Forest2Market.com,. The lack of available chips has produced a big demand for small, lower quality logs.

The fact is, pulp mills are using twice as many logs as they normally would to satisfy production levels. And they’re getting hit right in the wallet.

“One of the bright spots for timberland owners is the demand from the pulp-and-paper industry,” Stuber said. “Land owners have been withholding stands with larger trees until saw-timber prices rebound, but they have been able to generate revenue through thinning practices and harvesting younger stands.”

For the tale of the tape, the TSX Exchange fell 0.47%, while the TSX Gold Index dropped a modest 0.1% and the TSX Venture Exchange, Canada’s largest junior exploration bourse, added 0.97% with the advancing issuers beating out the decliners by a 528 to 469 margin on lower volume of nearly 194 million shares traded.

It was a good day for shareholders of Mano River Resources as the junior inked agreements with a leading Russian steel and natural resources company that include a $4 million equity placement and the sale of 61.5% of the Putu Range iron ore project in Liberia held under African Iron Ore Group, which is an 80% owned subsidiary of Mano. The price tag is $37.5 million. Satisfactory due diligence still needs to be completed but in the meantime, Mano added C$0.19 to close at C$0.36.

Investors are not enamored by proposed nuptials of Niblack Mining and Committee Bay Resources. The deal would see each Niblack share exchanged for one Committee Bay share. Of interest to cash-rich Committee Bay is Niblack’s wholly owned VMS project in southeast Alaska. Committee Bay ended the day down C$0.015 at C$0.265, while Niblack closed at C$0.27 for a C$0.03 loss.

It took a day for investors to digest but the latest drill results from the Represa zone of the Camino Rojo project in Mexico’s Zacatecas state helped shares of Canplats Resources. The owner of the highly touted find gained C$0.80 to close at C$4.75.

Metalex Ventures, WSR Gold and Arctic Star Diamond continued to trade heavily after the joint venture reported that massive sulphides have been encountered between 78.1 and 90.1 metres depth on their project in the James Bay Lowlands. Metalex ended the session down C$0.015 at C$0.35 on over 7.6 million shares traded, WSR dropped C$0.07 at C$0.63 on nearly 800,000 shares traded and Arctic Star lost C$0.02 to close at C$0.12 on over 2 million shares traded.

The volatility in the Canadian markets may be pointing to a short term top for the big producers, while the junior bourse is attracting more interest. We will see what Tuesday trading has in store.

Source:  Resource Stock Roundup Saturday, May 24, 2008

For the tale of the tape, the TSX Exchange gained a modest 0.01%, while the TSX Gold Index fell 0.9% and the TSX Venture Exchange, Canada’s largest junior exploration bourse, added 0.32% but the declining issuers beat out the advancers by a 537 to 492 margin on good volume of nearly 240 million shares traded.

VMS Venture cut another hot hole at the Reed Lake discovery zone in Manitoba. The latest hole cut 3.54% copper and 0.26% zinc over 81.07 metres, including 18.99 metres running 5.64% and 0.13% zinc. VMS ended the day up C$0.17 at C$0.72.

Speaking of hot holes, Hathor Exploration tagged a radioactive one on its 90% owned Midwest NorthEast uranium property in Saskatchewan. The latest drill results included 15 metres running an impressive 10.02% U308 in one hole and 10.06% U308 over 9 metres in another. Nice. Hathor ended the day up C$0.27 at C$3.05, while 10% carried interest holder Terra Ventures closed flat at C$0.75.

The latest drill results from the Represa zone of the Camino Rojo project in Mexico’s Zacatecas state helped shares of Canplats Resources. The owner of the highly touted find gained C$0.07 to close at C$3.95.

Shares of Niblack Mining were halted from trading at C$0.30 as the company is looking to merge with cash-rich Committee Bay Resources. The deal would see each Niblack share exchanged for one Committee Bay share. Of interest to Committee Bay is Niblack’s wholly owned VMS project in southeast Alaska. For its part Committee Bay was halted from trading at C$0.28.

The Canadian markets look to be a wee bit overextended these days with even stellar results bringing out the sellers looking to lighten their load. We will see what Friday trading has in store.

Source: Resource Stock Roundup: Friday, May 23rd, 2008