<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; CIT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/cit/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Lehman of 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-lehman-of-2009/20859</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-lehman-of-2009/20859#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Mathias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hank Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Mathias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman Bros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Naturally, at the focus of renewed market pessimism is a struggling financial: CIT Group. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=CIT+Group.">CIT</a>) The company — a hundred-year-old staple of small/medium business lending — is no stranger to walking the credit tightrope. They narrowly averted fiscal meltdown late last year with $2.3 billion in TARP bucks… then again in July by goosing bondholders with a $3 billion a debt-to-equity deal. Back then we joked, “Look for this crisis to repeat in a couple weeks.” We were wrong… it took a couple months.</p>
<p>So with some historic irony, one year and two weeks after <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC:LEHMQ">Lehman Bros.</a> bit the dust, another debt-burdened, credit-reliant, potentially “too big to fail” institution is looking to either stick its bondholders with a raw deal or enter&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naturally, at the focus of renewed market pessimism is a struggling financial: CIT Group. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=CIT+Group.">CIT</a>) The company — a hundred-year-old staple of small/medium business lending — is no stranger to walking the credit tightrope. They narrowly averted fiscal meltdown late last year with $2.3 billion in TARP bucks… then again in July by goosing bondholders with a $3 billion a debt-to-equity deal. Back then we joked, “Look for this crisis to repeat in a couple weeks.” We were wrong… it took a couple months.<span id="more-20859"></span></p>
<p>So with some historic irony, one year and two weeks after <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC:LEHMQ">Lehman Bros.</a> bit the dust, another debt-burdened, credit-reliant, potentially “too big to fail” institution is looking to either stick its bondholders with a raw deal or enter sudden bankruptcy. We won’t pretend to know exactly how this one will end, but the market has certainly voiced its opinion:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="CIT Group Decline" src="http://dailyreckoning.com/files/2009/10/DRUS10-05-09-1.GIF" alt="CIT Group Decline" width="470" height="326" /></p>
<p>Heh, and of course, Goldman Sachs (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=GS">GS</a>) has a horse in this race. They stand to make about a billion bucks if CIT goes into bankruptcy — the fruits of a smartly designed loan agreement. Hank Paulson, despite his GS pedigree, didn’t make such a deal when he put $2.3 billion in TARP funds on the line… a CIT bankruptcy would mean a near-total loss of taxpayer bailout loans.</p>
<p>CIT is one of the biggest lending sources for small- and medium-size business in America… what happens to this recovery when this well runs dry?</p>
<p>With or without CIT, “The real job creators in the U.S. economy, small businesses, will not expand hiring as expected,” forecasts Dan Amoss. “There are many reasons for subdued hiring plans; an emerging reason to avoid expansion and hiring will be heightened expectations that tax rates will soar in the future to pay for out-of-control government spending.</p>
<p>“So I expect over the next several months, mainstream pundits and forecasters will start worrying about tepid hiring, even as the pace of job losses slows. As we ‘lap’ the 2009 corporate cost cutting by early 2010, and top lines fail to rebound, earnings estimates will have to come back down. I’m amazed at how many sell-side analysts are modeling V-shaped recoveries in 2010 earnings. Most stock prices are disconnected from reality…</p>
<p>“The labor market is dealing with a structural imbalance fueled by government-sponsored housing and credit bubbles. Many will call for the government to ‘solve’ this labor market problem, which will cause a new type of market dislocation. By early 2010, some will push for the federal government to start hiring the chronically unemployed in ‘New Deal’ types of programs.”</p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/the-lehman-of-2009/">Source: The Lehman of 2009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-lehman-of-2009/20859/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware of the Obama Stimulus Trap</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/beware-of-the-obama-stimulus-trap/19594</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/beware-of-the-obama-stimulus-trap/19594#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Hutchinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EWZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Etf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Hutchinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silver Etf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Jobless Rate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Upbeat headlines have been everywhere in recent weeks, and they all seem to point to a single conclusion: The U.S. economy is in the early stages of a very rapid recovery.</p>
<p>In fact, when you peruse the news it’s difficult to come to  any other conclusion. For instance:</p>
<ul>
<li>A number of key earnings reports have been much better than expected, and company executives buttressed those profit figures with positive comments about the next 18 months.</li>
<li>The trading operations of  Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGS" target="_blank">GS</a>) and JPMorgan Chase  &#38; Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AJPM" target="_blank">JPM</a>) <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/17/jpmorgan-chase-accounting-mirage/" target="_blank">both  just reported record profits</a>.</li>
<li>U.S. housing prices rose in  May <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/30/housing-market-bottom/" target="_blank">for  the first time in three years</a>. Initial jobless claims have plunged 15% since their April peak. The Conference Board’s Index of&#8230;</li></ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upbeat headlines have been everywhere in recent weeks, and they all seem to point to a single conclusion: The U.S. economy is in the early stages of a very rapid recovery.<span id="more-19594"></span></p>
<p>In fact, when you peruse the news it’s difficult to come to  any other conclusion. For instance:</p>
<ul>
<li>A number of key earnings reports have been much better than expected, and company executives buttressed those profit figures with positive comments about the next 18 months.</li>
<li>The trading operations of  Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGS" target="_blank">GS</a>) and JPMorgan Chase  &amp; Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AJPM" target="_blank">JPM</a>) <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/17/jpmorgan-chase-accounting-mirage/" target="_blank">both  just reported record profits</a>.</li>
<li>U.S. housing prices rose in  May <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/30/housing-market-bottom/" target="_blank">for  the first time in three years</a>. Initial jobless claims have plunged 15% since their April peak. The Conference Board’s Index of Leading Economic Indicators rose 0.7% in June, <a href="http://www.conference-board.org/economics/bci/pressRelease_output.cfm?cid=1" target="_blank">its  third successive positive reading</a>.</li>
<li>And just yesterday  (Thursday), the <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI" target="_blank">Dow  Jones Industrial Average</a> topped the 9,200 mark <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-stocks-post-gains-on-analyst-comments-earnings-data-2009-07-30" target="_blank">for  the first time since November</a> – a potentially highly bullish development  for the economy, since stock prices are forward-looking.</li>
</ul>
<p>But while many experts will look at these developments as an excuse to celebrate the looming rebound to come, I actually see them as a real cause for concern. The reality is that these reports, when viewed in concert with other data, are actually a sign of a re-inflating financial bubble.</p>
<p>This is actually an “Economic Recovery Trap” that – when sprung – will inflict a lot of pain on overly optimistic investors. Now that we’re sufficiently forewarned, we should re-orient our money accordingly.</p>
<h3>Doomed by Deficits</h3>
<p>It’s not surprising that the U.S. economy has shown signs of strength in recent weeks; it has had huge amounts of money thrown at it.</p>
<p>On the fiscal side, the Obama administration’s May budget plan suggested deficit for the 2009 fiscal year (which ends in September) would reach $1.83 trillion – about 13% of gross domestic product (GDP).</p>
<p>However, subsequently released unemployment figures have  shown that <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/02/june-unemployment-rate/" target="_blank">the U.S.  jobless level reached 9.5% in June</a>, far above the 8.3% rate assumed in the  budget. And <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/27/mid-year-employment-outlook/" target="_blank">unemployment  is expected to spike further in the second half of the year</a>.</p>
<p>This worsening unemployment situation strongly suggests that the true budget-deficit figures will be even worse than those already announced, a supposition strengthened by the postponement – from mid-July to mid-August – of the normal mid-term budget review. Since U.S. President <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/President_Obama/" target="_blank">Barack Obama</a> is currently attempting to steer two difficult and expensive pieces of  legislation – the <a href="http://www.sightline.org/research/energy/res_pubs/cap-and-trade-101?gclid=CJHN-PWM_psCFdVL5QodFlsY-g" target="_blank">cap-and-trade</a> energy bill and the healthcare-reform bill – through Congress, he does not want unfavorable budget numbers appearing that might be used to persuade wavering legislators to oppose them.</p>
<p>Even at 13% of GDP in fiscal 2009 and 10% of GDP in fiscal 2010, the U.S. federal deficit is far above any previous level reached in peacetime, so it’s likely that if the economy begins to recover these deficits will prove difficult to finance, meaning the budgetary shortfalls will push up long-term interest rates.</p>
<p>That escalation in long-term rates, in turn, could choke off the economic recovery, which to be healthy requires a rebuilding of inventories, extensions of credit to new domestic-and-foreign customers, and a revival of enthusiasm for such large-ticket items as housing and automobiles.</p>
<p>With the yield on 10-year U.S. Treasuries already up from a low of 2.07% in December to a recent level of 3.60%, the dampening effect of rising interest rates may already be becoming apparent. In any case, the deficit is a dark cloud that threatens to obscure the economic outlook.</p>
<p>And that dark deficit cloud will be very difficult to  remove.</p>
<h3>Know Your (Real) Enemy</h3>
<p>The other main problem with today’s economy is the likely resurgence of inflation. Even the U.S. Federal Reserve – which under central bank Chairman Ben S. Bernanke for a long time apparently maintained a fear of <em><a href="http://www.wikinvest.com/wiki/Deflation" target="_blank">deflation</a></em> above all else  – admitted in its last meeting that the likelihood of deflation had receded.</p>
<p>That’s not surprising: In the last six months, core consumer price inflation (excluding food and energy) was a reported 2.4% annually. Although the “headline figure” has been low because of the sharp drop in energy prices the United States economy has experienced since last year, that effect is about to disappear, as energy prices peaked in early July 2008 and fell sharply throughout the fall. Thus, even reported consumer price inflation – on a year-over-year basis – is likely to surge in the months after this one (July).</p>
<p>Moreover, the reported inflation figure may be low. Each  month, the <a href="http://www.bls.gov/" target="_blank">U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics</a> “seasonally adjusts” consumer price statistics to remove normal seasonal patterns from the data. That seasonal adjustment process is thoroughly opaque, <a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/07/comment-on-seasonal-adjustments.html" target="_blank">and  is subject to manipulation</a>. In the early months of 2008, for example, when reported inflation was high, the downward seasonal adjustments were consistently much larger than the average of the decade 1998-2007. The process was then reversed late in the year, when reported inflation was negative, but the upward seasonal adjustments made it less negative. For the year as a whole, “seasonally adjusted” inflation was 0.5% below unadjusted inflation, which shouldn’t happen, except by bizarre rounding effects.</p>
<p>In the first six months of 2009, the negative seasonal adjustments have re-appeared, to the extent that total seasonal adjustments for the six months were minus 1.2%, compared with a 1998-2007 average of minus 0.61%. If the seasonal adjustments are indeed wrong, and should have been at only the average level, then “core” price inflation in the six months to June would have been 3.6% annually.</p>
<p>Not only is that <em>not</em> deflation; it suggests  accelerating <em>inflation</em>.</p>
<h3>Money Supply Moves</h3>
<p>Another reason I wouldn’t be surprised by a reappearance of rapid inflation is the big increases in the money supply we’ve seen over the last year.</p>
<p>According to St. Louis Fed data, the M2 money supply has  increased by 8.8% in the last year. The St. Louis Fed’s own <a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/MZM?cid=30" target="_blank">Money  of Zero Maturity</a> (MZM) – the best measure of the broad U.S. money supply available since the central bank ceased reporting M3 in 2006 – jumped 10.2%. And the overall monetary base zoomed an astounding 92.8%.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.moneymorning.com/images2/073009.gif" alt="" hspace="5" align="left" /></p>
<p>In addition, the Federal Reserve has bought $300 billion of  government bonds, always an inflationary warning signal since it <a href="http://www.investorwords.com/6583/monetize.html" target="_blank">monetizes</a> the deficit. Furthermore, the Fed and the government together have engaged in rescue, stimulus and guarantee programs totaling an astounding $23.7 trillion, according to Neil Barofsky, inspector general for the government’s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troubled_Asset_Relief_Program" target="_blank">Troubled  Assets Relief Program</a> (TARP). A “gross” number if ever there was one, that  figure is nearly twice overall U.S. GDP.</p>
<p>Let’s face reality: We’re going to be paying this bill for decades to come – almost certainly largely through resurgent inflation. In those circumstances, the recovery in the stock market is based not on reality, but simply on a bubble – an assertion that’s already been vindicated by the extraordinary afore-mentioned profitability of the Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase trading operations, which typically benefit enormously when bubbles are inflating and there is too much money sloshing about.</p>
<p>The near-bankruptcy of CIT Group Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=cit" target="_blank">CIT</a>), and the losses recorded by  the commercial banking sides of Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=cit" target="_blank">C</a>) and Bank of America Corp.  (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=bac" target="_blank">BAC</a>), demonstrate that even in a period when short-term rates are exceptionally low, conventional commercial banking is not currently a moneymaker.</p>
<p>Other then Goldman Sachs shares (whose prosperity is likely to be short-lived), it is clear that our investment dollars should be concentrated in two areas:</p>
<ul>
<li>Conservatively run overseas  economies.</li>
<li>And inflationary hedges such  as gold and silver.</li>
</ul>
<p>Let’s look at some investment opportunities in each  category.</p>
<p>First, we should buy moderately priced shares in countries where “stimulus” has been limited and in which monetary and fiscal policies are close to balance. The two largest such countries are <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/18/germany-emerging-market/" target="_blank">Germany</a> and <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/10/international-monetary-fund-forecast/" target="_blank">Brazil</a>,  so you should look at the Germany ETF iShares MSCI Germany Index (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=ewg" target="_blank">EWG</a>) and the Brazilian iShares  MSCI Brazil Index (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=ewz" target="_blank">EWZ</a>).</p>
<p>Second, you should make sure that a substantial portion of  your assets are in <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/16/gold-prices-5/" target="_blank">inflation hedges  such as gold</a> and silver, either in the metals directly through SPDR Gold  Shares (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=gld" target="_blank">GLD</a>) and  iShares Silver Trust (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=slv" target="_blank">SLV</a>)  or through gold mining shares, the exchange-traded fund (ETF) for which is the  Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=gdx" target="_blank">GDX</a>).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/31/obama-stimulus-trap/"><br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/31/obama-stimulus-trap/">Source: Beware of the Obama Stimulus Trap</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/beware-of-the-obama-stimulus-trap/19594/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investment News Briefs Wednesday, July 22, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investment-news-briefs-wednesday-july-22-2009/19338</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investment-news-briefs-wednesday-july-22-2009/19338#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Money Morning Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BLK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sgp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YHOO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>iPhones Carry Apple Past Wall Street Estimates; Coca-Cola Beats Estimates of Overseas Sales; CIT May Still Face Bankruptcy; TARP Czar Calls for Transparency; Caterpillar Stock Jumps on Brighter Outlook; BlackRock Beats Estimates, State Street Falls Short; Merck Considering Partner For Schering-Plough Consumer Health Operations; Yahoo Sales Down, Profit Up</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>The introduction of the new iPhone 3GS and a price cut for the 8-gigabyte iPhone 3G propelled <strong>Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AAAPL">AAPL</a>)</strong> to easily exceed Wall Street expectations for its third quarter ended June 30. The company reported a net income of $1.23 billion, or $1.35 a share, on revenue of $8.34 billion, compared to a net income of $1.07 billion, or $1.19 a share, on revenue of $7.46 billion in the same quarter last year.&#8230;</li></ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iPhones Carry Apple Past Wall Street Estimates; Coca-Cola Beats Estimates of Overseas Sales; CIT May Still Face Bankruptcy; TARP Czar Calls for Transparency; Caterpillar Stock Jumps on Brighter Outlook; BlackRock Beats Estimates, State Street Falls Short; Merck Considering Partner For Schering-Plough Consumer Health Operations; Yahoo Sales Down, Profit Up<span id="more-19338"></span></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>The introduction of the new iPhone 3GS and a price cut for the 8-gigabyte iPhone 3G propelled <strong>Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AAAPL">AAPL</a>)</strong> to easily exceed Wall Street expectations for its third quarter ended June 30. The company reported a net income of $1.23 billion, or $1.35 a share, on revenue of $8.34 billion, compared to a net income of $1.07 billion, or $1.19 a share, on revenue of $7.46 billion in the same quarter last year. Analysts were expecting earnings of $1.17 a share on revenue of $8.20 billion. Apple, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/01/tech-sector-rebound-2/">which could lead a second-half tech sector rebound,</a> sold 5.2 million iPhones in the quarter, compared to a mere 717,000 in the same quarter in 2008. The company’s computer business edged up 4% year-on-year, with sales totaling 2.6 million Macintosh computers in the quarter. Apple sold 10.2 million units of its ubiquitous iPod, down 7% from the previous year’s quarter.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>The Coca-Cola Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=ko">KO</a>) </strong>yesterday (Tuesday) reported better-than-expected second-quarter profit, as growth in emerging markets such as India and China helped offset the impact of the stronger U.S. dollar. Second-quarter profit rose 43% from the same period last year to $2.04 billion, or 88 cents per share. Sales fell 9% from last year, to $8.27 billion, something the company attributed to a rise in the value of the dollar. But international sales volume gained 5% in the second quarter, even as U.S. sales fell 1%.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>The $3 billion bridge loan <strong>CIT Group Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=cit">CIT</a>)</strong> may not be enough to keep the lender out of bankruptcy, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission SEC. With $1.7 billion in debt payments due by year’s end, and another $8 billion coming due in 2010, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090721-713855.html">analysts at CreditSights have said the company may need about $6 billion to avoid bankruptcy protection</a>, the <strong><em>Wall Street Journal</em></strong> reported.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Neil Barofsky, the special inspector general overseeing the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), said yesterday (Tuesday) that <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/07/21/news/economy/TARP_report/?postversion=2009072114">Treasury officials have not done enough to ensure American tax dollars are being used appropriately</a>, <strong><em>CNNMoney </em></strong>reported. The TARP Czar said the Treasury should require banks to report exactly how they’re using their bailout dollars. Barofsky also wants Treasury to report the actual worth of the assets it has purchased via the bailout. The inspector general’s office has launched 35 criminal and civil investigations into a range of allegations from accounting and securities fraud to insider trading and public corruption.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:CAT">CAT</a>)</strong> stock jumped more than 7.5% yesterday (Tuesday) after the company boosted its 2009 profit forecast. Second-quarter profit tumbled 66% to $371 million, or 60 cents per share, but the company said it saw evidence that government stimulus plans, particularly in China, are beginning to have an effect. Caterpillar stock surged $2.83 a share, or 7.72%, to close at $39.48.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Investment management firms <strong>BlackRock Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABLK">BLK</a>)</strong> and<strong>State Street Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ASTT">STT</a>)</strong> beat and missed Wall Street expectations in the second quarter. BlackRock reported a net income of $218 million on revenues of $1.03 billion, or $1.59 a share for the quarter ended June 30, down from last year’s net income of $274 million, or $2 a share. Analysts at <a href="http://www.factset.com/">FactSet Research</a> were expecting BlackRock’s earnings to be $1.58 a share on revenues of $1.01 billion. Meanwhile, State Street posted a net loss of $3.18 billion, or $7.12 a share on revenues of $2.12 billion. That compares to a net income of $548 million, or $1.35 a share. Analysts were <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ae?s=STT">expecting</a> earnings of 97 cents on revenues of $2.16 billion.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Merck &amp; Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=MRK">MRK</a>)</strong> may consider partnering with another company to invest in the consumer-health operations it will inherit with its planned purchase of <strong>Schering-Plough Corp.</strong> <strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ASGP">SGP</a>)</strong> Chief Executive Officer Richard Clark said in an analyst conference call yesterday (Tuesday). “Certainly there will have to be an investment in the consumer business,” Clark said, adding that the drug maker is now considering whether “we do it alone or can we do it with a partner?” Clark later said in an interview with<strong><em>The Wall Street Journal </em></strong>that is was <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090721-712454.html">too early to say which direction Merck was leaning</a>.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>A tough advertising market led to a decline in sales for <strong>Yahoo Inc. (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AYHOO">YHOO</a>)</strong>, but the search giant still managed to beat Wall Street estimates. For the quarter ended June 30, Yahoo reported a net income of $141 million, or 10 cents a share on revenues of $1.57 billion, compared to a net income of $131 million, or 9 cents a share on revenues of $1.79 billion. Wall Street estimates called for average earnings per share of 8 cents and revenues of $1.14 billion.</li>
</ul>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/22/investment-news-briefs-47/">Investment News Briefs Wednesday, July 22, 2009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investment-news-briefs-wednesday-july-22-2009/19338/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retail Sector Faces Uphill Climb in 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/retail-sector-faces-uphill-climb-in-2009/19257</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/retail-sector-faces-uphill-climb-in-2009/19257#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Blandeburgo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Blandeburgo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Downturn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobless Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SKS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TGT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Retail investors had a rough go of things in the first half, but since the March lows of all the markets, the <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=%5ERLX#chart2:symbol=^rlx;range=ytd;indicator=v" target="_blank">Standard &#38; Poor’s Retail Index</a> is showing progress toward its 52-week high of 427.13.</p>
<p>But don’t expect that to last. A slump in consumer spending and soaring unemployment could both pose a significant threat to retailers going into the 2009 holiday season.</p>
<p>The U.S. unemployment rate hit 9.5% in June and could eclipse 10% by the end of the year, sending the economy into a “<a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/category/jobless-recovery/" target="_blank">jobless recovery</a>.”<strong></strong></p>
<p>In a speech to Congress on May 9, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke cited a lack of consumer spending could serve as a constraint on hiring. This could create a paradoxical effect as employment obviously plays a&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retail investors had a rough go of things in the first half, but since the March lows of all the markets, the <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=%5ERLX#chart2:symbol=^rlx;range=ytd;indicator=v" target="_blank">Standard &amp; Poor’s Retail Index</a> is showing progress toward its 52-week high of 427.13.<span id="more-19257"></span></p>
<p>But don’t expect that to last. A slump in consumer spending and soaring unemployment could both pose a significant threat to retailers going into the 2009 holiday season.</p>
<p>The U.S. unemployment rate hit 9.5% in June and could eclipse 10% by the end of the year, sending the economy into a “<a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/category/jobless-recovery/" target="_blank">jobless recovery</a>.”<strong></strong></p>
<p>In a speech to Congress on May 9, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke cited a lack of consumer spending could serve as a constraint on hiring. This could create a paradoxical effect as employment obviously plays a key role in consumers’ spending habits.</p>
<p>Even for the employed, the lessons learned from the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression will resonate with consumers. That has already been evidenced by the U.S. savings rate, which has climbed above 4% for the first time in more than a decade.</p>
<p>In addition to taking money out of the hands of potential customers, soaring unemployment could lead to higher lending standards. As unemployment rises, so too will credit defaults and the cost of credit will increase accordingly.</p>
<p>In the past, consumers have counted on attractive financing promotions for the purchase of big-ticket items such as high-definition televisions and kitchen appliances. But that won’t be the case with tighter credit</p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/article/0,1002,cid%253D258367,00.html" target="_blank">Consumers were also able to spend more because of the easy availability of credit</a>, most notably through mortgage equity withdrawal and they responded by buying more items,” said Deloitte Strategic Advisor Richard Hyman.  “These conditions underpinned retail growth for the past 10 years but have now disappeared. However, it’s worse than that. They will clearly not return once the recession is over.”</p>
<p>Of course, tighter credit isn’t just a problem for consumers.</p>
<h3>A Brick &amp; Mortar Inventory Crunch for the Holidays?</h3>
<p>The <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/16/cit-bankruptcy/" target="_blank">potential bankruptcy of commercial lender CIT Group Inc.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:CIT" target="_blank">CIT</a>) could be a major tipping point for businesses that rely heavily on credit. Vendors for retail giants such as Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AWMT" target="_blank">WMT</a>) and Target Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ATGT" target="_blank">TGT</a>) rely on CIT for factoring – an old form of finance in which the lender pays the vendor for its accounts receivable. If the retailer fails to pay for the goods, the lender assumes the responsibility to pay the vendor.</p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/business/17factor.html?_r=1&amp;scp=6&amp;sq=CIT&amp;st=cse" target="_blank">Right now our industry is preparing for the fall and winter season</a>,” Kevin M. Burke, president and chief executive of the American Apparel and Footwear Association told <strong><em>The New York Times</em></strong>. “A lot of these orders are going to come to a grinding halt if there is no capital.”<br />
A CIT bankruptcy would be a “double whammy” to stores whose suppliers have already cut the amount of merchandise they are making to better align inventory with the drop in consumer spending, said Burke. If those suppliers lose their sole source of capital, what little merchandise retailers originally ordered might never arrive.<br />
<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE56F5OB20090717?virtualBrandChannel=11569" target="_blank">The timing of CIT’s woes is “terrible,”</a> Al Ferrara, a partner in retail and consumer products business of consulting firm <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=79326" target="_blank">BDO Seidman LLC</a> said in a <strong><em>Reuters </em></strong>interview. &#8220;Retailers now are basically gearing up for the back-to-school and the fall season.&#8221;<br />
An inventory crunch at brick &amp; mortar retailers would give a competitive advantage to online retailers, which have more flexibility and already account for about a third of holiday retail sales.</p>
<p>For brick &amp; mortar retail businesses, managing inventories during the holiday season is a delicate balancing act in which managers must walk a fine line between over- and under-ordering stock.</p>
<p>If retailers overstock, they will be forced to offer even steeper post-holiday discounts than they would like in a desperate bid to unload inventory. But if they don’t stock enough merchandise to meet demand they risk not only missing out on sales, but driving potential customers to online retailers, such as Amazon.com Inc. (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AAMZN" target="_blank">AMZN</a>) whose warehouses are not restricted by the display racks and checkout counters found in brick &amp; mortar stores.</p>
<p>This doesn’t mean brick &amp; mortar retailers will sit idly by this holiday season as Amazon siphons off customers via the Internet. All of the nation’s biggest retail players have their own websites too, but the gap between Amazon and the No. 2 online retailer, Staples Inc. (Nasdaq:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3ASPLS" target="_blank">SPLS</a>) is huge: Amazon <a href="http://www.internetretailer.com/top500/list.asp" target="_blank">generated $19.2 billion in online revenue in 2008</a>, while Staples generated less than half of that in the same year: $7.7 billion.</p>
<p>While half of the top 10 online revenue generators came from traditional stores, notably absent were brick &amp; mortar discount giants Wal-Mart and Target.</p>
<p>And even Best Buy Co. Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABBY" target="_blank">BBY</a>), which displays in-store signage promoting an “expanded assortment” of products online for consumers who did not find what they were looking for in the store, came in at just No. 10 on the list.</p>
<h3>Shopping for a Silver Lining</h3>
<p>While a continued slump in consumer spending would benefit no one, certain retailers are better positioned than others, and could ultimately use adverse economic conditions to turn a profit.</p>
<p>For instance, the aforementioned Amazon.com, which is the world’s largest online retailer, could see a sizeable boost in its web traffic as consumers comb the Internet for bargains.</p>
<p>Companies that have a consumer-friendly economical brand, such as Wal-Mart, will also benefit.</p>
<p>Wal-Mart’s “Save Money, Live Better” slogan is already resonating with consumers, and The No. 1 retailer in the world has gone to great lengths to cement its reputation as the affordable choice for shoppers.</p>
<p>The company has set up a “Save Money, Live Better” <a href="http://www.savemoneylivebetter.com/" target="_blank">website</a> (complete with testimonials of what people are doing with the money they save by shopping at Wal-Mart) and a “<a href="http://www.livebetterindex.com/" target="_blank">Live Better Index</a>,” which includes an interactive map of the United States to show how much money people have saved in each state by shopping at Wal-Mart.</p>
<p>The result of Wal-Mart’s efforts? Holiday sales grew 7% last year, according to the <a href="http://www.thearf.org/assets/feature-walmart-stays-step-ahead" target="_blank">Advertising Research Foundation.</a></p>
<p>Similarly, same-store sales are consistently rising at discount houses such as <strong>Family Dollar Stores Inc. </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=FDO" target="_blank">FDO</a>), and Ross Stores Inc. (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AROST" target="_blank">ROST</a>), the latter of which has the “Dress for Less” slogan<a href="http://blogs.oracle.com/retail/Ross%20Stores.PNG" target="_blank">right under its name at every store</a>. On the flip side, stores like Macy’s Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AM" target="_blank">M</a>) and Saks Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:SKS" target="_blank">SKS</a>) have reported consistent declines in same-store sales over the past few quarters.<br />
<img src="http://www.moneymorning.com/images2/EconomicSurvivors.gif" border="0" alt="" width="312" height="297" /></p>
<p>“Needs-driven spending will gravitate towards retailers able to tick the most important consumer boxes like price and convenience,” said Deloitte’s Hyman. “Although it will remain the engine of retail growth, wants-driven spending will slow and consumers will be much more choosy.”</p>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/20/retail-sector/">Retail Sector Faces Uphill Climb in 2009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/retail-sector-faces-uphill-climb-in-2009/19257/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Market Recoils as CIT Edges Toward Bankruptcy</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/market-recoils-as-cit-edges-toward-bankruptcy/19255</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/market-recoils-as-cit-edges-toward-bankruptcy/19255#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Simpkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apparel Manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBBY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chain Retailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DELL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Simpkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing Sectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Txn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMY]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The probably bankruptcy of <strong>CIT Group Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=cit" target="_blank">CIT</a>) could</strong> have major implications on the retail and manufacturing sectors this week, as many related companies are reliant on the financing giant.</p>
<p>With options running out over the weekend, CIT advisors began preparations for a bankruptcy filing. As of Sunday, <strong>JPMorgan Chase &#38; Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=jpm" target="_blank">JPM</a>)</strong> and <strong>Morgan Stanley (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=ms" target="_blank">MS</a>) </strong><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&#38;sid=aAxblWMCEuDg" target="_blank">were talking with other banks about a debtor-in-possession loan</a>, used to fund a company’s operations after it seeks court protection from creditors, <strong><em>Bloomberg News </em></strong>reported.</p>
<p>Bondholders held calls last week to discuss whether to swap some claims for equity to reduce indebtedness. Thomas Lauria, a lawyer at White &#38; Case LLP, told <strong><em>Bloomberg</em></strong> that a group of CIT creditors he represents offered to provide $3 billion in new loans to bridge CIT to&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The probably bankruptcy of <strong>CIT Group Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=cit" target="_blank">CIT</a>) could</strong> have major implications on the retail and manufacturing sectors this week, as many related companies are reliant on the financing giant.<span id="more-19255"></span></p>
<p>With options running out over the weekend, CIT advisors began preparations for a bankruptcy filing. As of Sunday, <strong>JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=jpm" target="_blank">JPM</a>)</strong> and <strong>Morgan Stanley (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=ms" target="_blank">MS</a>) </strong><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aAxblWMCEuDg" target="_blank">were talking with other banks about a debtor-in-possession loan</a>, used to fund a company’s operations after it seeks court protection from creditors, <strong><em>Bloomberg News </em></strong>reported.</p>
<p>Bondholders held calls last week to discuss whether to swap some claims for equity to reduce indebtedness. Thomas Lauria, a lawyer at White &amp; Case LLP, told <strong><em>Bloomberg</em></strong> that a group of CIT creditors he represents offered to provide $3 billion in new loans to bridge CIT to an out-of-court restructuring or an orderly bankruptcy, but had yet to hear back from CIT management.</p>
<p>“It seems CIT was ill-prepared for this moment, so they’re scrambling,” Scott Peltz, a managing director at consulting firm RSM McGladrey Inc. told <strong><em>Bloomberg</em></strong>. “Unless you have all these bondholders holding hands and singing Kumbaya, I think they’re too far behind the eight ball to avoid filing.”</p>
<p>While CIT is not nearly the household name of <strong>Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=cit" target="_blank">C</a>)</strong>or <strong>Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=bac" target="_blank">BAC</a>)</strong>, the lender finances over 1 million businesses – including Dunkin Donuts and Eddie Bauer.</p>
<p>Three prominent retail trade groups sent letters to financial regulators this week warning that the failure of CIT would undermine the industry supply chain.<br />
<a href="http://www.buffalonews.com/145/story/737721.html" target="_blank">“[Retailers] are unbelievably concerned right now,”</a> New York bankruptcy lawyer Jerry Reisman told the <strong><em>Buffalo News</em></strong>. “What we may have here is a total disruption in small business.”</p>
<p>Reisman said he received more than two dozen calls from panicked stores and apparel manufacturers, some of which said they may not have the money to pay their employees.</p>
<p>An otherwise light week on the economic calendar gives way to the next round of earnings as <strong>Apple Inc (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=aapl" target="_blank">AAPL</a>)</strong> and <strong>Texas Instruments Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ATXN" target="_blank">TXN</a>)</strong> highlight the corporate releases this week, while consumer companies <strong>The</strong> <strong>Coca Cola Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=ko" target="_blank">KO</a>)</strong>,<strong>McDonalds Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=mcd" target="_blank">MCD</a>)</strong>, and <strong>Amazon.com Inc. (Nasdaq:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=amzn" target="_blank">AMZN</a>)</strong> join the mix.</p>
<p>U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke will head to Congress where several critics await.  As for the healthcare debate, the August deadline seems less likely, though the Senate has its two cents to add in the coming days.  Expect plenty of politicized talk about the ballooning deficit and the impact on small businesses.</p>
<h3><strong>Market Matters</strong></h3>
<p>The financial sector appears to be on the mend as earnings season brought several positive signs that the worst is over and soon “business as usual” will return to Wall Street.  <strong>Goldman Sachs</strong> <strong>Group Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=gs" target="_blank">GS</a>) </strong><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/14/goldman-earnings/" target="_blank">easily surpassed analysts’ earnings estimates</a> on solid trading revenues, while <strong>JP Morgan </strong><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/17/jpmorgan-chase-accounting-mirage/" target="_blank">got a boost from its investment banking division to shatter the forecasts</a>.</p>
<p>Even <strong><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/18/citigroup-bank-of-america/" target="_blank">Citigroup and Bank of America posted solid results (thanks to one-time gains)</a></strong>, though both entities have many ongoing challenges to overcome before the Feds let them fend for themselves.</p>
<p>Of course, the possibility that CIT will file for bankruptcy protection has left panicked customers without a significant source of funding for their daily operations.  After late hour negotiations failed, the government chose to pass on another sizable bailout and allow true capitalism to play itself out.  CIT turned to private firm and bondholders to help devise a financing plan and avoid the fate of Lehman Bros. and others.  But now, nervous retailers and manufacturers are lining up alternative funding sources with the hope of dodging significant business interruptions.</p>
<p><strong>Bed Bath &amp; Beyond</strong> <strong>(Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3ABBBY" target="_blank">BBBY</a>)</strong> and <strong>Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=WMT" target="_blank">WMT</a>) </strong>are among CIT’s largest customers, though many are small independent operations.  A CIT failure could prove devastating for those firms considered the lifeblood of American business.</p>
<p>In other earnings news, techs enjoyed another decent quarter as<strong> Intel Corp. (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AINTC" target="_blank">INTC</a>)</strong> easily bested expectations (that is, before that $1.45 billion antitrust fine) and <strong>International Business Machines</strong> <strong>Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=ibm" target="_blank">IBM</a>)</strong> earnings grew by double-digits, while management raised its outlook for the next few quarters.  Though both offered encouraging signs for the sector (and economy as a whole), <strong>Dell Inc. (Nasdaq:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3ADELL" target="_blank">DELL</a>) </strong>warned that lower margins are impacting its operations and<strong>Google Inc. (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=goog" target="_blank">GOOG</a>)</strong> experienced its lowest rate of revenue growth since going public five years ago.</p>
<p>The travel industry continued to struggle as consumers and business professionals delayed trips and <strong>Marriott International Inc. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AMAR" target="_blank">MAR</a>)</strong> and American Airlines parent <strong>AMR (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AAMR" target="_blank">AMR</a>)</strong> posted disappointing results.</p>
<p align="center">
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="442" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Market/ Index</strong></td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Year Close (2008)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Qtr Close (06/30/09)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous Week</strong><br />
<strong>(07/10/09)</strong></td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Current Week </strong><br />
<strong>(07/17/09)</strong></td>
<td width="104" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Dow Jones Industrial</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,776.39</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,447.00</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,146.52<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,743.94</p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-0.37%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">NASDAQ</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,577.03</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,835.04</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,756.03<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,886.61</p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+19.63%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">903.25</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">919.32</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">879.13<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">940.38</p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+4.11%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Russell 2000</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">499.45</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">508.28</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">480.98<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">519.22</p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+3.96%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Global Dow</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1526.21</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,629.31<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,561.11<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,664.23</p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+9.04%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Funds</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0.25%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="bottom" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">10 yr Treasury (Yield)</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.24%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.52%<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.30%<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.65%</p>
</td>
<td width="104" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+141 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3><strong>Economically Speaking</strong></h3>
<p>The White House also experienced a “good news/bad news” week as House Democrats began to push forward a major healthcare overhaul.  Before the real lobbying could begin in earnest, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Director proclaimed the proposal would have no positive results on reducing costs or expanding coverage and would actually increase government spending.</p>
<p>Investors shrugged off the CIT developments and focused on positive earnings and economic data.  Stocks surged early on the Goldman news and soared right through the technology reports.  Technicians joined the fun as the <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP:.INX" target="_blank">Standard &amp; Poor’s 500 Index</a></strong> broke beyond resistance at 930, a strong sign for traders who monitor charts.  Major indexes snapped a month-long losing streak and the tech-heavy <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXNASDAQ:.IXIC" target="_blank">Nasdaq Composite</a></strong> climbed to levels not seen since last October, while fixed income suffered reverse “flight-to-quality” trades.  Oil rebounded on the favorable market and economic signs.</p>
<p>While the debate over a healthcare overhaul rages on, the Treasury Department reported that the budget deficit ballooned beyond a record $1 trillion and seemed prime to move even higher if Congress cannot reign in spending.   Analysts fear that interest rates ultimately will move higher should the alarming trend continue and foreign investors shy away from U.S. securities.</p>
<p>But for now, inflation seems very much under control, despite sizable jumps in both the retail and wholesale gauges.  Though gasoline prices surged by 17% in June, prices have already begun dropping at the pumps and most economists do not expect a repeat performance in the months to come.</p>
<p>Though retail sales increased in June for the second consecutive month, much of the gain was related to the rising gas prices and consumers remain reluctant to part with their hard-earned income in light of the weakening labor picture.</p>
<p>On a positive note, weekly jobless claims fell to its lowest level since January. However, naysayers claimed that much of the decline was due to calculation problems stemming from auto closures and layoffs are still very much on the rise.</p>
<p>Finally, the hectic economic calendar ended on a positive note as the housing sector showed renewed signs of a rebound as both new construction and permits for future activity experienced unexpected strength.  Even Dr. Doom himself, NYU professor Nouriel Roubini, the man best known for predicting the current crisis, reversed course and claimed the global economy would move out of recession by late 2009.</p>
<p>The minutes from the June Fed meeting showed that policymakers revised (positively) their forecasts for economic activity in 2009 and 2010, though they expect the unemployment situation to remain weak through next year.  Most Fed watchers do not see any change in the funds rate for the foreseeable future.</p>
<p>On another note, numerous renown economists (about 200), including a few Nobel prize winners, called on Congress to cease the grandstanding and stop criticizing the Fed’s handling of the financial crisis and economic downturn (particularly Bernanke’s “tactics” surrounding the Bank of America/Merrill Lynch deal).  The strongly worded letter by some of the nation’s sharpest minds stated that such politicizing could prove detrimental to the recovery.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="303" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td width="103" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Release</strong></td>
<td width="134" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Comments</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 14</td>
<td width="103" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">PPI (06/09)</td>
<td width="134" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Still no major inflation/deflation concerns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="103" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Retail Sales (06/09)</td>
<td width="134" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Increase most reflective of auto and gasoline sales</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 15</td>
<td width="103" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">CPI (06/09)</td>
<td width="134" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Big jump in gasoline price seen as temporary</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="103" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Industrial Production (06/09)</td>
<td width="134" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">8th straight month of declines</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 16</td>
<td width="103" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (07/11)</td>
<td width="134" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Decline though auto closures blurred results</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 17</td>
<td width="103" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Housing Starts (06/09)</td>
<td width="134" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Better than expected showing in starts and permits</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></td>
<td width="103" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="134" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 20</td>
<td width="103" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Leading Eco Indicators (06/09)</td>
<td width="134" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">July 23</td>
<td width="103" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (07/18)</td>
<td width="134" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="58" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="103" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Existing Home Sales (06/09)</td>
<td width="134" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/20/cit-bankrupcty/">Market Recoils as CIT Edges Toward Bankruptcy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/market-recoils-as-cit-edges-toward-bankruptcy/19255/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Risk Aversion Disappears Again</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/risk-aversion-disappears-again/19217</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/risk-aversion-disappears-again/19217#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Gaffney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Dollar & Forex Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Building Permits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Gaffney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosed Properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing starts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Aversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Risk aversion has left the building&#8230;  CIT survives without Fed help&#8230;  SNB tries to fight the markets&#8230;  Light week for US data&#8230; And Now&#8230; Today&#8217;s Pfennig!</p>
<p>Good day&#8230; We had just an amazing weekend of weather here in St. Louis, and this morning is shaping up to be another beautiful day. Friday turned out to be a beautiful day for those who have taken our advice and diversified their holdings out of the dollar. Risk aversion was placed on the back burner again, and investors moved money back out of the dollar into higher yielding currencies. The dollar and yen got sold but all other currencies rallied, and investors also turned back toward gold pushing the metal above $950 for the first time in over&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Risk aversion has left the building&#8230;  CIT survives without Fed help&#8230;  SNB tries to fight the markets&#8230;  Light week for US data&#8230; And Now&#8230; Today&#8217;s Pfennig!<span id="more-19217"></span></p>
<p>Good day&#8230; We had just an amazing weekend of weather here in St. Louis, and this morning is shaping up to be another beautiful day. Friday turned out to be a beautiful day for those who have taken our advice and diversified their holdings out of the dollar. Risk aversion was placed on the back burner again, and investors moved money back out of the dollar into higher yielding currencies. The dollar and yen got sold but all other currencies rallied, and investors also turned back toward gold pushing the metal above $950 for the first time in over a month.</p>
<p>So what caused all of this confidence? First, the housing data released Friday morning in the US showed a slight pick up in both building permits and housing starts. While the housing markets have a long way to go, the data have given investors an indication that construction may have found a bottom. Not to throw cold water on investors confidence in the building numbers, but while the residential market may be bottoming out, the commercial market continues to tumble. I spoke to a good friend over the weekend who is a commercial real estate developer down in Memphis. He told me that his development pipeline has completely dried up, and even the brokerage side of his business has slowed. The only part of his business which has picked up is the marketing of foreclosed properties. He has shifted his concentration to helping banks and lenders &#8216;work out&#8217; of commercial projects which they have taken back onto their books. The economy has kept most companies from opening new stores, and many continue to shut down under performing ones. My good friend tells me most of the people he talks to don&#8217;t believe the commercial real estate market will turn around until the end of next year. Not good news for the banks who are still reeling from the residential real estate bust.</p>
<p>But I digress. Investors weren&#8217;t focused on the commercial real estate market on Friday, they were just happy to see a possible bottom in the residential sector. Their confidence was boosted further after rumors spread that CIT would likely be saved from bankruptcy. Sunday these rumors were confirmed as it was reported that the CIT Group board had reached an agreement with bondholders that should keep the struggling business lender out of bankruptcy court. According to the Wall Street Journal, the deal won&#8217;t permanently fix the company, but it buys time for the lender to restructure itself.</p>
<p>We have blasted the administration in the past for the way they are handling the economy, so to be fair I will have to give them kudos for the way they handled the CIT meltdown. Instead of throwing good money after bad (the taxpayers have already given CIT $2.23 billion of TARP funds), Geitner and Bernanke passed on an AIG type bailout, and even stayed away from arranging a Merrill Lynch style &#8217;shotgun wedding&#8217;. Instead, they did exactly what they should have done and let the markets rescue CIT. It is still yet to be seen if the restructuring will ultimately work, but it is good to see the private capital markets are being left to their own accord, without intervention by the Fed. (Yes, I know the Fed is still involved, but not AS involved as they could have been!!)</p>
<p>The Euro climbed on Friday on some good economic reports. It was reported early Friday that Europe posted a trade surplus for a second month in a row. May&#8217;s trade surplus rose to 800 million euros as exports fell less than imports. The data add to evidence that commerce with the rest of the world will likely pull the Euro region out of the recession. Another report showed German producer prices fell at the fastest rate in more than 40 years last month as energy costs declined and demand weakened. The June decline of 4.6% from a year earlier was the biggest drop since December 1968. Lower producer prices are a good for the European economy where industrial production rose for the first time in nine months in May and manufacturing orders in Germany increased the most in two years.</p>
<p>The rally by the Swiss franc was dampened by intervention as the Swiss National Bank sold the currency to halt its rise. The sales, which occurred over the past few weeks, were the SNB&#8217;s first solo currency market interventions since 1992. While they have been able to beat back the currency markets for now, the SNB doesn&#8217;t have deep enough pockets to fight a long protracted war against the currency market. As Chuck has pointed out several times in the past, intervention can move the market in the short term, but it takes a very large amount of reserves and an iron willed effort to fight the longer term trend. The Swiss franc will likely keep pace with the Euro, as both gain vs. a falling US$.</p>
<p>As investors regained their confidence, the higher yielding currencies of Australia and New Zealand advanced. Both currencies moved up over 1.5% vs. the US$ and hit the highest levels in two weeks vs. the Japanese yen. The Canadian dollar also rallied, completing its first five-day increase since May. A run up in crude oil helped strengthen the loonie by over 4% vs. the greenback last week.</p>
<p>Chuck is waking up in Vancouver this morning, his favorite city located north of St. Louis. While he spent most of the day yesterday traveling, he was able to send me the following from David Rosenberg, who is usually pretty good with his thoughts&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;It is the second anniversary of the credit crunch and after all of the fiscal and monetary policy initiatives, the best we get are &#8220;green shoots&#8221; and now that story is getting stale. Go back two years and you will see that the Fed Funds rate was 5.25%, Today it is zero. The fiscal deficit was 2% of GDP two years ago. Today it is 13%. Mortgage rates were 6.5%. Today they are 4.7%. Homeowner affordability with all the government measures is 70% stronger today than it was then too. The Fed&#8217;s balance sheet then was $850 Billion. Today it is bloated at $2 Trillion. The government has tried just about everything. Or has it? What if we were to tell you that the one policy tool that is unchanged since the summer of 2007 is&#8230; The U.S. dollar? It is exactly the save level now, on any trade-weighted measure, as it was back then. The greenback is struggling at the 50-day moving average, and this could well be the next policy shoe to drop&#8230; &#8221;</p>
<p>David makes an excellent point. In spite of all of the negative numbers with regard to the US economy, the value of the dollar is basically unchanged over the past two years. This is bound to change, as US policy makers will have to let the dollar fall in order in the face of rising inflation and skittish foreign investors. As we have repeatedly pointed out, the administration has three choices with regard to the tremendous debt load which has been built up in recent years. 1) They can increase revenues (yes, they are increasing taxes, but these increased taxes are already spent on the new health care program). 2) They can decrease expenditures (big government is back, expenditures aren&#8217;t going to fall anytime soon!). 3) They can let the dollar fall in order to pay back the debt with cheaper dollars (the most likely scenario!!).</p>
<p>As always, we encourage you to protect yourself from the eventual drop in the value of the dollar by diversifying your investments into other currencies and gold or silver.</p>
<p>We start what looks to be a pretty light week of data here in the US with the Leading Indicators index which will be released later this morning. This is the Conference Board&#8217;s gauge of the economic outlook for the next three to six months and is expected to show an slight increase. If so, it would be the first time the index has shown three consecutive months of increases since 2004. But even those that are expecting the index to show another rise are preaching caution. Most economists believe that even if the index indicates the recession is ending, recovery will be slow. High unemployment and cautious consumers will keep the US economy under pressure.</p>
<p>After today, the markets will have to turn their attention to the weekly jobless claims to be released on Thursday as tomorrow and Wednesday will only bring the ABC consumer confidence number and MBA Mortgage application data neither of which are closely watched. We will also get more data on the housing market on Thursday with the release of Existing home sales data. Friday will close the week out with the U of Mich confidence number. As I said, should be a rather slow week on the data front. Now on to the currency wrap-up:</p>
<p>Currencies today 7/20/09: A$ .8113, kiwi .6535, C$ .9057, euro 1.4216, sterling 1.6522, Swiss .9366, rand 7.9646, krone 6.3411, SEK 7.7407, forint 192.16, zloty 3.0236, koruna 18.1879, yen 94.61, sing 1.4399, HKD 7.750, INR 48.255, China 6.8320, pesos 13.26, BRL 1.9261, dollar index 78.92, Oil $64.74, 10-year 3.69%, Silver $13.7175, and Gold&#8230; $952.98</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it for today&#8230; As I said in the opening paragraph, the weekend weather was just phenomenal here in St. Louis. I competed in another triathlon yesterday, and did ok; not a personal best, but ran through some pretty bad leg cramps. Congratulations to my training partner, Matt B. who ended up the overall winner. And a big congrats goes out to Tom Watson, who just missed an 8 foot birdie put to become the oldest person to win a major. It is an inspiration when a guy almost double the age of his competitors can go out and beat all but one! Hope everyone has a great start to your week and a Marvelous Monday!!</p>
<p><a href="http://dailypfennig.com/currentIssue.aspx?date=7/20/2009">Source: Risk Aversion Disappears Again</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/risk-aversion-disappears-again/19217/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investment News Briefs Tuesday, July 14, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investment-news-briefs-tuesday-july-14-2009/19064</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investment-news-briefs-tuesday-july-14-2009/19064#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Money Morning Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DELL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FORR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMGMQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WFC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>GM May Salvage Pontiac Car; CIT Void to Be Filled, More Expensive; Dell Expects Higher Q2 Revenue; U.S., UBS Lawsuit Delayed for Possible Settlement; U.S. Deficit Grows; Russian Investor Boosts Stake in Facebook; Microsoft Office Goes Online</p>
<div class="entry">
<ul>
<li>General Motors Co. (OTC: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC:GMGMQ" target="_blank">GMGMQ</a>) <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124750200514433499.html" target="_blank">is &#8220;actively&#8221; looking to salvage the relatively new Pontiac G8 from the discontinued Pontiac brand</a> – renaming it as the “Caprice” – to provide a large performance sedan to the Chevrolet division, which will soon account for 75% of GM’s U.S. auto sales, company Vice Chairman Bob Lutz told <strong><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></strong>. In an e-mail to the newspaper, Lutz said <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontiac_G8" target="_blank">the two-year-old G8</a> is &#8220;finally being discovered&#8221; and is attracting a cult following. The car, which is built in Australia, will draw performance-oriented buyers&#8230;</li></ul></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM May Salvage Pontiac Car; CIT Void to Be Filled, More Expensive; Dell Expects Higher Q2 Revenue; U.S., UBS Lawsuit Delayed for Possible Settlement; U.S. Deficit Grows; Russian Investor Boosts Stake in Facebook; Microsoft Office Goes Online<span id="more-19064"></span></p>
<div class="entry">
<ul>
<li>General Motors Co. (OTC: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC:GMGMQ" target="_blank">GMGMQ</a>) <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124750200514433499.html" target="_blank">is &#8220;actively&#8221; looking to salvage the relatively new Pontiac G8 from the discontinued Pontiac brand</a> – renaming it as the “Caprice” – to provide a large performance sedan to the Chevrolet division, which will soon account for 75% of GM’s U.S. auto sales, company Vice Chairman Bob Lutz told <strong><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></strong>. In an e-mail to the newspaper, Lutz said <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontiac_G8" target="_blank">the two-year-old G8</a> is &#8220;finally being discovered&#8221; and is attracting a cult following. The car, which is built in Australia, will draw performance-oriented buyers into Chevy dealerships and will help GM compete in the lucrative police-car market currently dominated by <strong>Ford Motor Co. </strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=f" target="_blank">F</a>).</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="entry">
<ul>
<li>The void left by troubled bank <strong>CIT Group Inc.’s </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ACIT" target="_blank">CIT</a>) bankruptcy will be filled in time, but the borrowers it serves – primarily entrepreneurs and small businesses – will likely incur a higher cost than they did with CIT. &#8220;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124751442687534457.html" target="_blank">There will be other lenders that can take CIT’s place</a>,&#8221; said Bob Seiwert, head of the American Bankers Association’s commercial lending and business banking in an interview with <strong><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></strong>. &#8220;The challenge will be the time it could take CIT borrowers to find a home, given current conditions.&#8221; Among the competitors mentioned that could fill the void CIT left are <strong>Wells Fargo &amp; Co.</strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AWFC" target="_blank">WFC</a>), <strong>Bank of America Corp. </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABAC" target="_blank">BAC</a>), <strong>General Electric Co.’s </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGE" target="_blank">GE</a>) <strong>General Electric Capital Corp. </strong>and some regional and community banks.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Dell Inc. </strong>(Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3ADELL" target="_blank">DELL</a>) said yesterday (Monday) that it expects to report a slight sequential boost in its revenue for the second quarter ending July 31. The Round Rock, Texas-based company said that year-over-year demand for its information technology products appears to have stabilized and it also expects a modest decline in its gross margins as a result of higher component costs, a competitive pricing environment and an unfavorable mix of product and business-segment demand. “We continue to believe that customers are deferring IT purchases, and that we will see demand return to more typical levels at some point,” said Chief Financial Officer Brian Gladden.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>A Miami judge granted a postponement of an evidentiary hearing while Swiss bank <strong>UBS AG </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AUBS" target="_blank">UBS</a>) works with U.S. and Swiss governments to settle a lawsuit seeking the names of 52,000 American account holders suspected of using Swiss secrecy laws to evade taxes. The hearing date is now set for August 3 and 4, and could be postponed longer if settlement talks are unfinished. “<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a5I69J8QktHs" target="_blank">We are anxious for the governments of these two democracies to resolve these issues</a>,” UBS attorney Eugene Stearns told<strong><em>Bloomberg News</em></strong>. “It’s a minefield trying to resolve these issues.” <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSL84407220090708" target="_blank">UBS may be able to afford to pay up to $5.5 billion</a> in a potential settlement, <strong><em>Reuters </em></strong>reported last week.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-budget-deficit-rises-above-1-trillion-2009713141700" target="_blank">The U.S. cumulative federal budget deficit grew to a record $1.08 trillion in June,</a> <strong><em>MarketWatch.com</em> </strong>reported, citing Treasury Department information. That’s a stark contrast to the same time last year, when the deficit was $285.8 billion. Outlays increase to $309.6 billion and receipts rose to $215.3 billion for the month. The outlays included $11.3 billion in Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) funds. The Obama administration is projecting a $1.26 trillion deficit in FY2010, which begins in October.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Russian investing firm <strong>Digital Sky Technologies </strong>will boost its stake in <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=12500558" target="_blank">Facebook Inc.</a> </strong>to as much as 3.5%, paying $14.77 a share for the privately held social network’s common stock, valuing Facebook at $6.5 billion. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE56C4TH20090713" target="_blank">Digital Sky did not say whether it would impose a cap</a> on the amount of shares participants can offer, spokeswoman Jennifer Gill told <strong><em>Reuters</em></strong>. Prior to Monday’s pricing, investors in secondary markets valued Facebook’s common stock between $10 and $10.50 a share, or up to $4.7 billion, according to <a href="http://www.secondmarket.com/" target="_blank">SecondMarket</a> Managing Director Adam Oliveri.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Microsoft Corp.</strong> (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AMSFT" target="_blank">MSFT</a>) will release three web-based versions of its ubiquitous Office suite, finally competing with <a href="http://docs.google.com/" target="_blank">Google Docs</a>, a similar (and free) product <strong>Google Inc. </strong>(Nasdaq:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=GOOG" target="_blank">GOOG</a>) launched three years ago. &#8220;<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE56C34T20090713?sp=true" target="_blank">Microsoft is in a tough spot</a>. Their competition isn’t just undercutting them. They are giving away the competitive product,&#8221; <strong>Forrester Research Inc.</strong>(Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AFORR" target="_blank">FORR</a>) Sheri McLeish told <strong><em>Reuters</em></strong>. Shares of Microsoft closed at $23.23, up 3.75% or 84 cents in trading yesterday (Monday), while Google stock was up $9.90, or 2.39%, closing at $424.30.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/14/investment-news-briefs-42/">Investment News Briefs Tuesday, July 14, 2009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investment-news-briefs-tuesday-july-14-2009/19064/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investment News Briefs Thursday June 18, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investment-news-briefs-thursday-june-18-2009/18070</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investment-news-briefs-thursday-june-18-2009/18070#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Money Morning Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRK.A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRK.B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBHI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMGMQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Index Cpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation Fears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U S Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Consumer Prices Increase Less Than Expected; Ten Banks Repay TARP Debt; Bankrupt Eddie Bauer Attempts Sale; Berkshire Hathaway Options Begin Trading; FedEx Losses Mount; Saab Cuts Debt; Gas Prices Keep Going, Going, Up; Boeing Gets First Air Show Order; China Will Invest Sovereign Wealth in Hedge Funds; Analyst: S&#38;P 500 Will Hit New Highs By 2012; Bond Yields Drop; Mortgage Apps Plunge</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Inflation fears were quelled at least temporarily as U.S. consumer prices were raised only slightly last month, and actually experienced their biggest drop in almost 60 years. Higher gas prices contributed to the 0.1% increase in the Labor Department’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) versus the April’s CPI, which was flat. Financial markets had expected a 0.3% increase. The CPI&#8230;</li></ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consumer Prices Increase Less Than Expected; Ten Banks Repay TARP Debt; Bankrupt Eddie Bauer Attempts Sale; Berkshire Hathaway Options Begin Trading; FedEx Losses Mount; Saab Cuts Debt; Gas Prices Keep Going, Going, Up; Boeing Gets First Air Show Order; China Will Invest Sovereign Wealth in Hedge Funds; Analyst: S&amp;P 500 Will Hit New Highs By 2012; Bond Yields Drop; Mortgage Apps Plunge<span id="more-18070"></span></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Inflation fears were quelled at least temporarily as U.S. consumer prices were raised only slightly last month, and actually experienced their biggest drop in almost 60 years. Higher gas prices contributed to the 0.1% increase in the Labor Department’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) versus the April’s CPI, which was flat. Financial markets had expected a 0.3% increase. The CPI fell 1.3% versus the same period last year, the largest drop since April 1950. &#8220;There is no sign that there has been widespread inflation because of the Fed’s quantitative easing regime. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN1732991520090617">In fact, long-term inflation expectations haven’t budged and the Fed is still ahead of curve on inflation</a>,&#8221; economic and investment strategist John Canally of <a href="http://lplfinancial.lpl.com/">LPL Financial</a> told <strong><em>Reuters</em>.</strong></li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Four of the nation’s largest banks <a href="http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aSmLfH2N0h0s">repaid $54.7 billion to the U.S. Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program</a> (TARP), freeing themselves of government restrictions on lending and pay.<strong>JPMorgan &amp; Chase Co. </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AJPM">JPM</a>) repaid $25 billion, and<strong>Morgan Stanley </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AMS">MS</a>) and <strong>Goldman Sachs Group Inc.</strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGS">GS</a>) repaid $10 billion each, <strong><em>Bloomberg News </em></strong>reported. As <strong><em><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links" onclick="return alinks_click(this);" title=""  style="padding-right: 13px; background: url(http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-content/plugins/alinks/images/external.png) center right no-repeat;" rel="external">Money Morning</a>’s </em></strong>Martin Hutchinson reported yesterday (Wednesday), the other two banks, <strong>U.S. Bancorp</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AUSB">USB</a>) and <strong>BB&amp;T Corporation </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABBT">BBT</a>) repaid their debts of $6.6 billion and $3.1 billion respectively. <a href="http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aSmLfH2N0h0s">The banks are among 10 other that agreed last week to repay $68 billion in TARP funds</a>,<strong><em>Bloomberg News </em></strong>reported. “Our strong capital position allowed us to pay back TARP in a very short amount of time,” BB&amp;T Chief Executive Officer Kelly King said in the bank’s statement.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Beleaguered outdoor clothing retailer <strong>Eddie Bauer Holdings Inc.</strong>(Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AEBHI">EBHI</a>) yesterday (Wednesday) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and said it planned to sell itself to private equity firm <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=9626489">CCMP Capital LLC</a></strong> for $202 million. The sale to CCMP, known as a <a href="http://library.findlaw.com/2004/Oct/27/133620.html">363 sale</a>, means the sale needs the approval of a judge, and other bidders could emerge. CCMP is entitled to a $5 million breakup fee if it loses to a higher bidder. Court filings show that <strong>Bank of America Corp. </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABAC">BAC</a>), <strong>General Electric Company </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGE">GE</a>) and <strong>CIT Group Inc. </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:CIT">CIT</a>) <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/18/business/18bauer.html?ref=business">will provide up to $100 million in financing during the bankruptcy case</a>,<strong><em>The New York Times </em></strong>reported. Eddie Bauer said its 371 stores in the United States and Canada are operating as usual.<strong></strong></li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Berkshire Hathaway Inc. </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABRK.A">BRK.A</a>, <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABRK.B">BRK.B</a>) options will begin trading on the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE), <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=ariNfbARVw9w">enabling investors to bet on the company using a technique Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Warren Buffet has rejected</a>, <strong><em>Bloomberg News </em></strong>reported. “Usually, if you want to buy or sell a stock, you should buy or sell the stock,” Buffett said last year on the weekend of the company’s annual meeting. “Using options, four times out of five you will be right, the last one you’ll miss. I’ve virtually never used options as a way to enter or exit a position.” CBOE will offer contracts on Buffet’s conglomerate starting today (Thursday).</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>FedEx Corp.’s </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AFDX">FDX</a>) losses more than tripled in its last quarter, and the company <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hqOcgeUaMb_AeJEbYhIzG6C-5MlQD98SIFE80">said things won’t be much better in the near future</a>, <strong><em>The Associated Press </em></strong>reported. The nation’s second-largest package shipper reported a loss of $876 million, or $2.82 per share in the quarter ended May 30. That compares to a loss of $241 million, or 78 cents per share in the same period last year. &#8220;The operating environment for our first two quarters in fiscal 2010 is expected to be extremely difficult,&#8221; Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Alan B. Graf Jr. said. The company has not yet decided whether it will have to lay off more workers or make further cutbacks due to poor economic conditions, Graf said in a conference call with investors.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Newly sold automaker <strong>Saab </strong>secured a key court ruling yesterday (Wednesday) to cut 75% of the more than $1.28 billion (10 billion in Swedish crowns) of debt <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE55F1LO20090617">after a vast majority of creditors approved the proposal</a>, <strong><em>Reuters </em></strong>reported.  Sweden-based Saab was sold on Tuesday to fellow countrymen <strong><a href="http://www.koenigsegg.com/">Koenigsegg Group AB</a></strong>by soon-to-be former parent <strong>General Motors Corp. </strong>(OTC:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC%3AGMGMQ">GMGMQ</a>).</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li><a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OIL_PRICES?SITE=AP&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&amp;CTIME=2009-06-17-15-32-05">The annual rise in gas prices entered its 50th straight day</a>yesterday (Wednesday) after crude prices bounced back after an initial slump in the beginning of this week, <strong><em>The Associated Press</em></strong>reported. Pump prices are now at a national average of $2.67 per gallon. The rising crude prices and less production has added to the typical increase in demand in the late spring and summer months as more Americans take to the roads for vacation-related travel.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>After being dogged by reports of orderless days at the Paris Air Show, <strong>The Boeing Co. </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ABAC">BA</a>) finally got a <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_FRANCE_AIR_SHOW?SITE=AP&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT">$153 million order for two single-aisle planes</a>, <strong><em>The Associated Press </em></strong>reported. But this order pales when compared to the $6.2 billion in orders already attained by rival <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=14150184">Airbus S.A.S</a>. </strong>Both aircraft makers are feeling the economic crunch by the worldwide recession.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>China will use part of its $200 billion sovereign wealth fund to invest in hedge funds, according to Felix Chee, who will initially run the fund. “<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=ai5PLqcRXWyc">We will have a preference for managed accounts</a>,” he said in an interview with <strong><em>Bloomberg News</em></strong> Wednesday at the GAIM International hedge fund conference at Monaco’s Grimaldi Forum. “The platform would like a core of single-manager funds and fund-of-funds.” Chee, is a special adviser to the chief investment officer of <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=4&amp;url=http://www.china-inv.cn/cicen/&amp;ei=UlA5StmdGYqeMvS6gIsN&amp;usg=AFQjCNEHI_99qMy-4uJpc9JHyGzWmrnDow&amp;sig2=ZKWxaTkujKkkirG0kbVUtw">China Investment Corp.</a></strong>’s hedge fund and proprietary trading effort, “It’ll be across the spectrum of strategies,” he said. “We’re looking for the best managers and a handful of fund of funds, and when I say handful I mean five or less.”</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>A prominent Wall Street analyst sees the benchmark <strong>S&amp;P 500 Index</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP:.INX&amp;ei=clk5SteoH5i0NbvAwIYN&amp;usg=AFQjCNHBr3U_3S7tcS_hw3FhJZdrozuFfg&amp;sig2=g81Qz1UdTnVXu0-bxyYfVw">.INX</a>) breaking its all-time record by the end 2012. <strong>JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:JPM&amp;ei=Olk5SoeqCY6UMsr16ZkN&amp;usg=AFQjCNEoZj4LfoOIg3OAF1WriNzZH9wxzg&amp;sig2=yZirGoP7V7f0x6aeZGpN6w">JPM</a>) Chief U.S. Equity Strategist Thomas Lee said on Wednesday the index should surge back above 1,500, its October 2007 high in less than three years, provided the U.S. economy sees a V-shaped recovery.  &#8220;<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE55G3UP20090617">The global economy is in the midst of a synchronized recovery</a>,&#8221; Lee said at the <strong><em>Reuters </em></strong>Investment Outlook Summit.  Lee also reiterated his year-end 2009 target of 1,100 for the S&amp;P 500, saying the United States will likely come out of its recession some time this summer, followed by the rest of the developed world.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Prices on <strong>Fannie Mae</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:FNM&amp;ei=-lg5St_PCKWkNfW2kIUN&amp;usg=AFQjCNE-NIueKj1m_BGF_aj5pjp5Icx2yA&amp;sig2=pcDi7ymmxrJPxEynwbEtTw">FNM</a>) and <strong>Freddie Mac</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:FRE&amp;ei=4Vg5SvWoIZ3KMZGUrIgN&amp;usg=AFQjCNHdRk2fINlEjHlSH9RiCnFnfQQ6ig&amp;sig2=IL4Fa2qK8zzaDUSkJjdQYA">FRE</a>) mortgage securities rose for the fifth day Wednesday, pushing yields down as they tracked a drop in rates on benchmark U.S. Treasuries, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aW1TXVZHn9bg">foreshadowing possible further declines in borrowing costs for new home-loans.</a> Yields on Washington-based Fannie Mae’s 30- year fixed-rate mortgage bonds fell by 0.02% to 4.56% in New York trading, the lowest since June 3, according to data compiled by <strong><em>Bloomberg.</em></strong> Treasuries and so-called agency mortgage bonds rallied after a government report showed the cost of living rose less than forecast in May. The mortgage-bond yields are down from 5.07% on June 10, the highest level since the Federal Reserve announced plans to buy home-loan bonds in November.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Applications for mortgages fell for a fourth consecutive week, with overall demand <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSNYS00515720090617">plunging to its lowest level in nearly seven months</a>, according to a report Wednesday from the Mortgage Bankers Association.  Rising interest rates have tempered demand for refinancings and new purchase applications, as the industry group’s seasonally-adjusted index fell 15.8% to 514.4 for the week ended June 12, the lowest since the week ended November 21, 2008.  Rates on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages averaged 5.50%, down 0.07% from the previous week, but significantly higher than the all-time low of 4.61% set in the week ended March 27,<strong><em>Reuters</em></strong> reported.</li>
</ul>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/18/investment-news-briefs-29/">Investment News Briefs Thursday June 18, 2009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/investment-news-briefs-thursday-june-18-2009/18070/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CIT Group Offloads Home Mortgage Business</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/cit-group-exits-home-mortgage-market-with-18-billion-in-deals/3426</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/cit-group-exits-home-mortgage-market-with-18-billion-in-deals/3426#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Yousfi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRK.A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRK.B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clatyon Homes Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Yousfi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Banking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/cit-group-exits-home-mortgage-market-with-18-billion-in-deals/3426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After posting four consecutive quarterly losses, CIT Group  Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ACIT" onclick="s_objectID=" finance?q="NYSE%3ACIT_1">CIT</a>) took a step in the right direction yesterday (Tuesday), announcing it struck $1.8 billion in separate deals with Lone Star Funds and a subsidiary of Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=brk.a&#38;hl=en" onclick="s_objectID=" finance?q="brk.a&#38;hl=en_1">BRK.A</a>, <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=brk.b&#38;hl=en&#38;meta=hl%3Den" onclick="s_objectID=" finance?q="brk.b&#38;hl=en&#38;meta=hl%3Den_1">BRK.B</a>).</p>
<p>Dallas, Tex.-based Lone Star will acquire CIT’s home lending business, which has $9.3 billion in assets and related servicing operations, for $1.5 billion in cash and the assumption of $4.4 billion in outstanding debt, <strong><em>MarketWatch</em></strong> reported.</p>
<p>In an unrelated deal, Vanderbilt Mortgage &#38; Finance Inc. will pay $300 million for CIT’s prefabricated home loan portfolio. Vanderbilt is the wholly owned financial subsidiary of <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=6487" onclick="s_objectID=" finance?cid="6487_1">Clatyon Homes Inc.</a>, which  was purchased by Berkshire Hathaway in August 2003.</p>
<p>“These sales complete our exit from all&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After posting four consecutive quarterly losses, CIT Group  Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ACIT" onclick="s_objectID=" finance?q="NYSE%3ACIT_1">CIT</a>) took a step in the right direction yesterday (Tuesday), announcing it struck $1.8 billion in separate deals with Lone Star Funds and a subsidiary of Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=brk.a&amp;hl=en" onclick="s_objectID=" finance?q="brk.a&amp;hl=en_1">BRK.A</a>, <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=brk.b&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den" onclick="s_objectID=" finance?q="brk.b&amp;hl=en&amp;meta=hl%3Den_1">BRK.B</a>).</p>
<p>Dallas, Tex.-based Lone Star will acquire CIT’s home lending business, which has $9.3 billion in assets and related servicing operations, for $1.5 billion in cash and the assumption of $4.4 billion in outstanding debt, <strong><em>MarketWatch</em></strong> reported.<span id="more-3426"></span></p>
<p>In an unrelated deal, Vanderbilt Mortgage &amp; Finance Inc. will pay $300 million for CIT’s prefabricated home loan portfolio. Vanderbilt is the wholly owned financial subsidiary of <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=6487" onclick="s_objectID=" finance?cid="6487_1">Clatyon Homes Inc.</a>, which  was purchased by Berkshire Hathaway in August 2003.</p>
<p>“These sales complete our exit from all home lending businesses, removing the uncertainty surrounding this asset class, and advances our strategic transformation into a company focused entirely on commercial finance,” <a href="http://www.cit.com/main/media-room/press-releases/" onclick="s_objectID=">CIT  Chairman and Chief Executive Jeffrey M. Peek said in a company statement</a>.</p>
<p>CIT plans to use the cash proceeds of the sales to pay off maturing debt and will refocus its business on commercial lending, after being wracked by losses stemming from the subprime mortgage crisis.</p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aqnXoECwdVss&amp;refer=home" onclick="s_objectID=" news?pid="20601087&amp;sid=aqnXoECwdVss&amp;refer=home_1">Ugly  prices, but this basically had to happen in order for CIT to survive</a>,”  David Havens, a credit analyst with UBS AG (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ubs" onclick="s_objectID=" finance?q="ubs_1">UBS</a>) in Stamford, Conn.,  said in a note to investors, <strong><em>Bloomberg News</em></strong> reported. “CIT  continues to make progress in addressing thorny liquidity issues.”</p>
<p>The bottom line won’t be rosy just yet, as CIT forecasts a $2.5 billion loss in the second quarter of 2008 due to an estimated $2.2 billion loss on the sales and an additional $300 million operations loss during the period. But the company feels the sales were an important measure “to reduce risk and enhance liquidity.”</p>
<p>Despite the loss, the sales and planned use of the proceeds represent “a step in the right direction” for CIT, David Chiaverini, an analyst with BMO Capital Markets in New York, told <strong><em>Bloomberg</em></strong>. “In this  market environment, lenders and corporate debt buyers are concerned about  commercial debt as well.”</p>
<p>CIT Group shares rose almost 30% with a gain of $2.02 to  close at $8.83 yesterday.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/07/01/cit-group-exits-home-mortgage-market-with-1.8-billion-in-deals/">Source:  CIT Group Exits Home Mortgage Market with $1.8 Billion in Deals</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/cit-group-exits-home-mortgage-market-with-18-billion-in-deals/3426/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.482 seconds -->

