The problem I have with this dogmatic definition of a bear market rally is the following: Assuming (and this isn’t a forecast, since I really haven’t the foggiest idea where stock markets will be in six or 12 months’ time) the S&P 500 moved up to 1350 and then declined to 500, as an investor should you care if the move to 1350 — a 100% gain! — was a bear market rally?

My impression is that investors’ fixation on the recent rally being a bear market rally has actually kept most investors on the sidelines and hoarding cash. Now, put yourself in the shoes of a fund manager who, in the last 18 months, has lost 50% of his clients’ money and missed the recent rally (34% for the S&P 500). What is he likely to do? I would think that he would be inclined to purchase equities as they correct the sharp advance since early March, especially as the economic news in the near term becomes less negative.

Based on our conversations with numerous managers in recent weeks, we believe that most quantitative managers’ portfolios were not positioned in expectation of a rally. Of the nearly 80 managers we have talked to, only one manager said they were up since March 9th and the clear majority admitted to being notably down or stopped out on their positions. These managers were both long-only and long-short quant managers using market neutral and non-market neutral strategies, sector neutral and non-sector neutral strategies, longer term and intermediate-term holding periods. It is fair to say that just about everyone is bewildered and trying to understand when this rally will end.

Another factor to consider is that there has been a significant improvement in the technical position of world stock markets. In the US the largest number of new 12-month lows was reached in October. At the November 21 low at 741 for the S&P 500, the number of new lows had already contracted, and even more so at the index’s March 6 low at 666. Also, market breadth and the number of stocks moving above their 200-day moving averages have taken a decisive turn for the better, indicating that the stock market advance is broadening and that the number of stocks that have bottomed out (at least in the intermediate turn) is expanding.

I have explained repeatedly in the past that if a government is really determined to try and postpone an inevitable collapse by “printing money” in order to lift or support asset prices, it can be done. However, the result of such a monetary policy is to lower the purchasing power of its paper currency, with catastrophic long-term consequences for its economic and financial volatility.

It forces individuals and institutions with cash to buy something…anything. So, this cash is channeled into gold and/or different paper currencies, commodities, equities, bonds, real estate, and consumer goods and services, but obviously with different intensities and at different times. For instance, at some times, such as in 2008, more money will be allocated to gold; while at other times, such as since early March, more money will flow into equities and industrial commodities. It is well understood that these money flows are driven largely by speculative activity (and more than a little dose of manipulation). The result in all asset markets is very high volatility and price fluctuations that don’t appear to make any sense to most market participants and observers who don’t understand the new rules of the investment game that were brought about by “money printing”.

This is where we are today, irrespective of whether or not you and I like policies of “quantitative easing, massive bailouts, and frightening fiscal deficits” and their long-term consequences! Another positive factor for stock markets is that a large number of Asian stock markets and individual stocks in the region had already bottomed out in October and November of 2008 and didn’t confirm the new low in the S&P in early March.

In Asia, the Taiwan and Shanghai indexes, and Korea’s Kospi Index, are all up by more than 50% from their late October 2008 lows. (The Shenzhen Index is up 90%.) But it is not only the Asian equity markets that have outperformed the US and Western European markets over the last few months; since late January 2009, the RTS Russian Index is up 66% and the MSCI Emerging Market ETF is up by 55% from its early November 2008 low.

This is not to say that the global economy is about to embark on a strong and sustainable growth phase. It also doesn’t mean that a new bull market in global equities à la 1982– 2000 has begun. But I think that, at least in nominal terms (inflation-adjusted), the global printing presses being run by the world’s central banks and fiscal deficits have begun to impact asset prices positively. Therefore, in the case of resource and mining stocks, as well as Asian equities (and, for that matter, most emerging and other stock markets around the globe), the lows thatwere reached between October and March of this year are likely to hold — that is, for now.

The markets that have the highest probability of having made major longer-term lows are resource-related equities, emerging markets, and Japan. Conversely, the asset market that has the highest probability of having made a secular high (such as Japan in 1989, or the Nasdaq in March 2000) is the US long-term government bond market.

Despite a still-weakening economy and massive quantitative easing, long-term bond yields appear to be on the verge of breaking out on the upside. I have listed again below all the equity recommendations I have made since December 2008. Some of these equities have already moved up substantially (resource and mining companies, in particular) and, therefore, I would only buy most of these recommendations on a correction.

In addition, a number of BRIC and other (mostly emerging market) closed-end country funds and ETS were recommended, such as Brazil ETF (EWZ), the Templeton Russia Fund (TRF), the Greater China Fund (GCH), the Asia Pacific Fund (APB), Taiwan iShares (EWT), the Japanese ETF (EWJ), the Japan Smaller Capitalization Fund (JOF), the Morgan Stanley India Fund (IIF), the Turkish Fund (TKF), and the MSCI Emerging Market ETF (EEM).

In the US, late last year we recommended buying the iShares iBox Investment Grade Corporate Bond (LQD) and Nicholas Applegate Convertible & Income Fund (NCV), while earlier this year we recommended the accumulation of stocks of high-tech companies such as Cisco (CSCO), Intel (INTL), Oracle (ORCL), and Yahoo (YHOO). More recently, we recommended beaten-down insurance companies and financials as rebound candidates, including Leucadia National (LUK) and CNA Financial (CNA), Citigroup (C), the BKX, the Financial Bull 3x Shares (FAS), and the Financials Select Sector SPDR.

The market’s advance had been broadening and that more and more groups such as airlines (AMR), homebuilders (TOL, CTX, HOV), and cyclicals such as Dow Chemical (DOW), International Paper (IP), and Alcoa (AA) are showing signs of having bottomed out. Among commodities, I am particularly intrigued by natural gas. There are natural gas ETFs (UNG, GAZ), but costs are high. A better way is probably just to buy future contracts, or Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD) or the First Trust ISE Revere Natural Gas Index Fund (FCG).

Source: What to Buy…or Not Buy

It involves the use of innovative products that enable shippers to defend themselves from pirate attacks.

While it may not seem like a lucrative business, the uptick in high seas shenanagins over the past year or so threatens to become more prevalent if it’s not addressed. And with millions of dollars worth of cargo traveling by sea every day, both the shipping industry and the companies whose cargo they’re hauling hardly want to see the trend become a full-blown epidemic.

At the moment, however, only the Department of Defense and various small private companies are responsible for “mobility denial systems.” Described as an “oil slick in a can,” these weapons make it difficult for bandits to board (and remain on) a ship.

But there are a few major, publicly traded American companies that are combating this problem amid their other defense issues…

Take That, Jack Sparrow

First up, one of the world’s largest defense companies, Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT). The firm has partnered with BAE Systems PLC. (Pink Sheets: BAESY) and Israeli weapons systems developer Rafael Armament Development Authority to develop “The Protector.”

While it sounds like the hero of a 1980s action movie, The Protector Anti-Piracy Robot is an unmanned robot with a mounted 7.62mm machine gun. Originally designed to protect harbors, The Protector is capable of defending ships from attackers, while keeping the crew out of harm’s way.

A more widely used form of anti-pirate defense is Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) systems, designed by American Technology Corporation (Nasdaq: ATCO).

Equipped with high-powered speaker systems, these devices can be used to issue ear-splitting beams of sound directly at the bandits, or provide verbal warnings (no word, though, as to whether, “Back, ye scurvy dogs!” is on the list of available commands).

Despite the fact that these systems are more common, keep in mind that ATCO is a tiny stock and can be illiquid.

Here are three other ways to play the piracy protection trend…

Three Ways To Play High Seas Banditry

The Defense Angle: You can’t dip into many sectors or industries these days without finding the presence of General Electric (NYSE: GE).

The company’s defense subsidiary, GE Security, offers various communications systems that are used to enhance ocean security.

The Insurance Angle: In addition to direct defense sector plays, there are also several insurers and reinsurers, which have an important maritime business and could face exposure if a ship is lost at sea. These include CNA Financial Corp. (NYSE: CNA), Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE: MMC) and Willis Group Holdings (NYSE: WSH).

The Cargo Angle: Consider commodity plays on cargo like oil. If oil cannot be shipped directly for fear of it being intercepted by pirates, it could drive up the price. A straightforward, more diverse (and thus less risky), cheaper and safer way to play this would be to buy an ETF like the U.S. Oil Fund ETF (NYSE: USO).

You could also consider timber companies like Plum Creek Timber (Nasdaq: PLUM). It’s historically a solid market outperformer anyway, which isn’t a bad investment to have in your portfolio at times like these.

Move With The Waves As This Maritime Trend Grows

For pirates, the lure of capturing easy booty from an unsecured ship in the middle of an ocean is an attractive proposition.

And while the current US-Somali standoff will eventually end (hopefully in peace), companies are realizing that there’s a more pressing need to secure their cargo and crews while at sea.

In an economy where it’s mighty difficult to make money at the moment, the prospect of losing cargo to pirates will force companies to pay for the security products and services that can protect their haul.

While the majority of the companies in the maritime security space are small and privately owned, if the piracy trend increases, you’ll likely see more well established firms enter the market – especially those with long histories of securing government contracts, such as Lockheed and GE.

Hoping your longs go up and your shorts go down.

Source:  Ocean Piracy: Fill Your Trading Account With Booty From The “Pirate Portfolio”

This stock is just waiting to explode. He recommends you take advantage of this investing opportunity and says, “because of its strong dividend policies, investors will be well compensated while they wait for that oil-price rebound.”

This from Horacio:

In the face of the global financial meltdown, the price of oil has plummeted from a record high of almost $150 a barrel in July to less than $40 recently. And now it seems to be bottoming.

Clearly, this isn’t the precise moment to call a market bottom, but it is reasonable to think about a bottom around this range for a few reasons.

For starters, the forward curve of oil futures prices is showing a very marked upward slope, known in the commodities business as a forward curve in “contango.”  This means that – the farther out we go – the higher and higher oil futures prices climb. To see what we mean, let’s take a look at the projected price of oil as depicted by this graph.

A futures curve as upwardly skewed as this one provides a great opportunity for profits:  One can just buy oil today, sell it forward and hold it until December 2016 and make a guaranteed rate of return of about 62%.  In a year, you can make about 11% by just buying now, holding it and delivering in a year.  If you add some leverage to the transaction, you can make a nice return.

Some sophisticated players are doing just that: They’re buying oil, and are holding it in a tanker in port – with the obvious intent of capturing these profits.

However, this very favorable contango arbitrage is not going to last for long, as more players have been jumping into it, thus flattening the futures curve with time.  It is easy to see that, at some point, as oil gets absorbed into storage, and the curve gets inverted, the speculative players that shorted oil by selling futures long ago without having production or physical oil will be squeezed into covering at much higher spot prices.  This spike in spot prices situation will develop in less than a year, as demand recovers.

The slope of the curve also indicates widespread expectations for inflation.

From Stimulus to Inflation

The U.S. government has launched a huge stimulus package and its plan for a $3.6 trillion budget for fiscal 2010 will elevate the fiscal deficit to a staggering $1.75 trillion this year – a numbing 12.3% of gross domestic product (GDP).

And we have yet to deal with the massive social-security and health-care entitlement programs, which pose a huge fiscal threat ahead.

The financing of the announced deficits will come through issuance of U.S. Treasuries, which means that the U.S. Federal Reserve will have to monetize the debt. That is, the U.S. central bank will have to print money in order to make it available to buy the debt, since the level of issuance is so high that foreign buyers will not be able to purchase all the debt.

In addition, the Fed has already been very busy expanding its balance sheet in order to pump liquidity into the markets to buy mortgages and other assets. And it has already lowered its benchmark Federal Funds rate to a range of 0.00%-0.25%.

Why are the Fed and the government so intent in stimulating the economy?

The nightmare scenario for any central bank is falling into the so-called “liquidity trap” – a situation that exists when an economy’s asset prices enter a deflationary spiral and people reach the conclusion that by merely sitting in cash, even at a zero interest rate, they are getting richer by the day.  In that situation, monetary policy becomes ineffective, since rates are already at zero, and since it is very difficult to get out of that deflationary spiral.

That is precisely what happened in Japan during its “Lost Decade.” By the time the Japanese figured out that they needed to do something very dramatic in terms of stimulus, it was too late. The drop in prices had already created too many losses in the banking system and taken the entire system into bankruptcy.

Therefore, the theory goes, very aggressive monetary and fiscal action is needed right at the outset, in order to prevent the deflationary spiral and to actually generate some inflation.  At the same time that the United States, at the epicenter of the global crisis, is acting in this manner, countries around the rest of the world, which have been affected to different degrees, have launched their own stimulus initiatives.

China’s Stimulus Points to Strong Global Demand

China, which is at the forefront of global commodities demand, is of particular interest.  China needs to grow its economy at a minimum rate of 8% a year in order to employ the 18 million workers that join the labor force annually.  This is an imperative for a country that has dictatorial government, in order to avoid massive unrest.  That’s why in November, Beijing announced a $585 billion (4 trillion yuan) stimulus plan. It’s also why the country is taking such aggressive steps to assure access to supplies of key commodities.
Since then, the government has been aggressively buying long term access to commodities in such countries as Brazil and Australia.

Aluminum Corp. of China (NYSE ADR: ACH), otherwise known as Chinalco, has invested $19.5 billion in Rio Tinto PLC (NYSE ADR: RTP) to acquire stakes of up to 50% in nine of Rio’s mining assets.

China also struck a deal with Brazil’s Petrobras (NYSE ADR: PBR) for a long-term supply of oil.

China Development Bank, one of China’s largest state-owned enterprises, agreed to lend $10 billion to Petrobras for its ambitious deepwater-development program in order to ensure a long-term daily supply of 160,000 barrels oil. That followed a similar deal with two Russian giants. China Development Bank lent $15 billion to OAO Rosneft Oil Co., Russia’s state-owned oil company, and $10 billion to the Russian state pipeline monopoly Transneft (PINK: TRNFF). In return for the needed financing, Russia agreed to supply China with 15 million tons of oil annually for 20 years.

Hence, the outlook for commodities – given easy global monetary and fiscal policies, and a reflationary bias – is very favorable, and we are going to take advantage of it.

Enter Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc. (NYSE: DO).

Drilling for Profit

Diamond Offshore is the world’s second-largest driller by market capitalization, right after Transocean Ltd. (NYSE: RIG).  It has 31 floating rigs: nine sophisticated deepwater semi-submersibles, one drill ship for very deep water, and 21 other semi-submersibles.  In addition the firm owns only 13 jack-up rigs, of which only seven are in the Gulf of Mexico.

What I like about Diamond Offshore is its conservative, shrewd management and its commitment to shareholders.  The latter is especially ensured because of the situation of its controlling company, the New York conglomerate Loews Corp. (NYSE: L), which owns 54% of the Diamond Offshore’s stock.

Loews, run for half a century by the Tisch family, initially acquired Diamond Offshore’s assets in an opportunistic transaction in 1992.  It then sold 30% of the company to the public in 1995 and later acquired Arethusa (Offshore) Ltd. in 1996, using stock, a move that reduced its participation to the current 54%. Since that time, Diamond Offshore has been using its ample cash flow to repurchase shares from public hands.

Diamond Offshore, also referred to as DO, has been managed very wisely.  As the world’s No. 2 contract driller, DO has concentrated on the higher-priced equipment, that is, the semi-submersible rigs, which operate in deep waters.  And deep water, which require that higher-priced equipment, is where the biggest action is.

And since the specialized deepwater equipment is all taken, DO’s mid-depth equipment benefits because it can be adapted for use on bigger projects.

DO has minimized its exposure to jack-up rigs (those that rest on the ocean floor) and especially to work in the Gulf of Mexico, which has more competition and lower daily rates.

No wonder that DO’s fourth-quarter results handily beat analysts’ consensus estimates of $2.34 per share by posting operating earnings per share of $2.53.  Revenue also beat expectations, showing a 1% increase over the prior quarter.  The company also realized higher day rates and higher utilization rates.

These are all indications of strong management execution.  What is impressive about DO is that the company used the run-up in oil prices last year to enter into long-term contracts at very high prices, registering an impressive $10.3 billion backlog.  That gives Diamond Offshore a great earnings visibility going forward.

But the upside does not stop there.

There is a special situation in the making, because the Loews Group owns CNA Financial Corp. (NYSE: CNA), an insurance company that is trading at half of its book value.  You see, insurance companies have been hit hard financially by markdowns in their fixed-income and hedge-fund holdings, but Loews invested $1.25 billion in CNA last fall in a move to improve the company’s balance sheet.

And in order to be ready to defend debt ratings, a conservative management like Tisch has all the incentive in the world to keep maximizing Diamond Offshore profits to support CNA – should it be needed despite CNA’s current strong liquidity and financial flexibility.

DO recently paid one of its regular special dividends of $1.85 a share, bringing the dividend yield to almost 13%.  If this dividend is safe – and we believe that it is – this is a winning strategy for the group, given the current financial environment, and it will greatly help to maximize profits and cash flow from Diamond Offshore.

Mark Urness, a friend of mine at Calyon Financial, one of the leading energy research specialists on Wall Street, concurs with our assessment of this sky-high dividend. He estimates that DO will continue to offer the 12.5% dividend yield, which is unparalleled in the oilfield-services segment. We, like Mark, expect the company to distribute $8 a share in 2009 in the form of both the regular and the special dividends that DO has been using.

DO has been extremely disciplined with costs and with new investments, maximizing free-cash flow to almost $900 million last year.  In fact, with the ample backlog at higher prices of the contracts signed, DO should increase its free cash flow and net income to about $1.4 billion to $1.5 billion in 2009.

DO’s profit margins are impressive – and exorbitant – thanks to the shortage in rigs: Gross margins are 64% and operating margins are 54%.

These margins are likely to keep growing as management continues to execute thoroughly and oil prices rebound.  This strong growth in revenue and earnings – driven by DO’s savvy positioning in deepwater and mid-water rigs, and bolstered by rebounding oil prices thanks to global monetary and fiscal conditions – will surely help deliver much higher multiples than the meager six times earnings that Diamond Offshore’s shares are currently trading around these days.

Diamond Offshore’s shares closed Friday at $55.58. They are down 62% from their 52-week high of $147.77.

This cash-rich, profit-fountain company is a resounding “Strong Buy,” as its stock is waiting to explode to the upside.

Recommendation: Buy Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc. (NYSE: DO), a top player in its sector, and a company that is poised to capitalize on a projected resurgence in oil prices. Because of its strong dividend policies, investors will be well compensated while they wait for that oil-price rebound (**).

(**)  Special Note of Disclosure: Horacio Marquez holds no interest in Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc. (NYSE: DO).

Source: Buy, Sell, or Hold: Profit From the Projected Oil-Price Rebound With Diamond Offshore