That was the general reaction from the press when US food giant Kraft launched its first bid for British confectioner Cadbury less than two months ago. Pundits spewed out potential target prices like bingo numbers – £8, no £10, no £12! – and analysts scribbled out scenarios involving white knights and rival bidders from across the globe.

Reality has been a little more disappointing. Despite attempts to talk up the deal, no rival bidders have come forth. And yesterday Kraft came back to the table with an offer that can only be described as – as Cadbury’s board put it – ‘derisory’.

It’s just another sign that there’s a vast gap between conditions in the financial world and those in the ‘real’ world…

Market hopes are stretched far beyond reality
The Cadbury / Kraft bid saga shows just how far market hopes are stretched beyond reality.

Right up to yesterday’s bid deadline, analysts and investors were clearly expecting Kraft to pull some rabbit out of the hat that would give them an excuse to drive the confectioner’s share price higher from its already optimistic level of around 760p.

Instead, Kraft came back with an offer that suggested that, frankly, they can take Cadbury or leave it. The bid terms were exactly the same, which – because Kraft’s share price has fallen since the original bid was made – meant that the actual per share value had fallen, from the equivalent of 745p to 717p.

Yet, the Cadbury share price is still hovering pretty much exactly where it was yesterday. You can read more about the background to the story, and what we reckon Cadbury shareholders should do now, in my colleague David Stevenson’s blog on the topic.

What’s perhaps more interesting about this bid battle is what it says about the bigger picture and the market’s psychology right now. When this deal was first announced, the excitement in the City pages was palpable. This was the return of big deals, a sign that the recovery was on track.

Click here to finish this article at Money Week UK.

Judging by the sudden rise in fame of Levi Johnson or Balloon Boy’s antics, the human brain is far feebler than we give credit.

And so are the markets.

If you have taken a basic finance class anytime between 1965 and the present, you have likely studied Eugene Fama and his efficient market hypothesis.

Essentially, the University of Chicago professor created a cult-like following of investors and academicians that believe markets entirely reflect all known information and instantly react to new information.

For example:

When I told my ever-optimistic, ever-“hopeful” colleague, Laura Cadden, the news the majority of Obama’s infrastructure stimulus would finally be doled out sometime early next year was already priced into the market, I was showing my belief in efficient markets.

When she gave me a look that curled my toenails, I knew she didn’t believe in such “nonsense.”

The difference between efficient market “believers” and “non-believers” is as strong and divided as the difference between the Left and the Right. In many cases, in fact, the same arguments are involved.

It’s obvious these days that the Left does not believe in Fama’s theory. Why else would it build new regulations and reforms in an effort to limit market freedom?

The Right, on the other hand, with its unending determination to “let the markets handle it,” believe efficient markets will govern and regulate themselves as long as politicians keep their busy hands out of it.

Most of Wall Street tends to follow the Right’s path, realizing the more we know about an investment, the better the decisions we can make.

But it doesn’t matter what you and I think. We aren’t in charge.

Right now, the Left is in charge.

That means free market economics have got to yield to big governments and ever-increasing regulations.

That makes guys like Chris Dodd happy.

Just a few of hours ago, the Senate Banking Committee’s chairmen released an 1,100-page draft bill that takes the very notion of efficient markets and capitalism working hand in hand and tosses it out the window.

Instead of letting a Darwinian-style market separate the strong from the weak, Mr. Dodd wants the government to do the work.

His monstrous bill, which is still nearly 50% shorter than Pelosi’s anti-market healthcare package, finally calls for the “change” so many folks voted for last November.

The Feds power to regulate banks is eradicated. The FDIC role is limited. A new consumer protection agency is created. Executive compensation is in play. Credit-rating agencies will get new guidelines. And of course, the derivatives industry will be re-tooled.

Welcome to the new America, my comrades.

Washington is working to do everything it can to make the markets as inefficient as possible.

It is one more piece of information that proves that human mind is greatly overvalued.

*** Just to prove that efficient markets are still at work and new information can make or break a portfolio, the natural gas industry is reeling today as the International Energy Agency officially warned of a global glut of the vital energy source.

Gas prices are down to their lowest levels in weeks after the agency warned of a strong decline in demand this year and a massive spurt in new production.

As I write, natural gas is trading for $4.483 per MMBtu. Less than a month ago, that figure was just shy of the $6.00 mark.

It’s a downward trend with no end in sight.

Fortunately for TFN Strategic Trader, the news means just one thing, big gains.

I recommended four ways to play the situation recently. Earlier today, all four picks were worth double-digit gains, with one doozy up by 324%.

There’s still time to get in on the action. Read my exclusive report right here.

(Taipan Publishing Group) – Gold, small caps and the U.S. dollar have had a stable three-way relationship for the better part of the 2009 rally. Now the three could be parting ways.

Dr. Marc Faber is one of the few market wise men whose thoughts are worth pondering. His monthly “Gloom, Boom & Doom Report” is always a good read. He is an active, Asia-based investor with decades of experience, hundreds of millions under management, and many prescient calls under his belt.

Faber has stated firmly and clearly what he thinks of the U.S. dollar. As you might expect, his opinion is not too flattering.

In the long run, Faber assigns the buck a value of “zero.” In the manner of all fiat currencies, America’s scrip is slowly being turned into toilet paper. The present cast of clowns in Washington seems bound and determined to accelerate this process as Wall Street cheers them on.

But that’s the long term, mind you. In the shorter term – i.e. for at least the next quarter or so – Faber is bullish on the buck. So bullish, in fact, that he is now on record as a buyer of $USD.

“As of today, I will be long in dollars,” Faber told Bloomberg last week. (Perhaps he is buying from my colleague Adam Lass, who professed on Thursday his intent to remain short.)

Continue reading Justice Litle on Taipan Daily.

“What’s different?” asked colleague Manraaj Singh at this morning’s conference.

Early every morning, while most Americans are still in their beds, your editor joins a group of analysts and financial journalists to discuss the day’s news.

“What happened to the price of copper? Why are Asian stocks going down? Are they really going to cut rates today?” The answers are not always satisfying, but the questions keep coming.

And the question this morning was: what has really changed?

U.S. stocks held steady yesterday, but they’re down 5% so far this year. The dollar held steady yesterday too, but it is down for the year too – about 6% against the euro and the yen. The Europe- or Japan-based stock market investor has lost more than 10% of his money.

Meanwhile, the fall of the dollar has increased prices for imports. While the United States used to “import deflation” from Asia and elsewhere, now it imports inflation. Prices are rising all over the world.

Yesterday, European producer prices were reported rising at 6.1% per year. High prices have caused the biggest drop in retail sales on record. And yesterday, they had to call out the riot squad in Brussels, to battle fishermen who were kvetching about high fuel costs.

In China, retail prices are rising at an 8.5% rate – the fastest in 12 years.

In Russia, prices are going up at a 14.39% rate.

In Vietnam, the consumer price inflation rate is running at 25%.

In Venezuela, the inflation rate is 29%.

And in Zimbabwe…well, Zimbabwe is another story altogether, with inflation going up so fast they can’t even measure it. Prices are said to be increasing at 160,000% to 200,000% per year. But who can tell? There’s nothing to buy.

Back in Asia…the region’s central banks had hoped that Milton Friedman was wrong. They had hoped that a worldwide economic slowdown would reduce domestic inflation rates. So, they left their lending rates low – considerably lower than the CPI – in order to keep their economies turning over. In Thailand, for example, the central bank lends at 3.25%, while consumer prices rise at more than 6%.

Sound familiar? The United States also keeps its key-lending rate well below the inflation rate – and for the same reason. The Fed lends at 2%. Inflation was last clocked running twice as fast.

We pause here in honest admiration for our fellow investors – the kind of admiration we feel for members of a bomb disposal unit, or a knife-thrower’s assistant. What are we to think? They are lending money to world’s biggest debtor – the U.S. government – for 10 years at 3.94%. That’s yesterday’s yield on the 10-year T-note. If nothing changes, they will get nothing for their trouble. If inflation rates rise (or just happen to be understated), or the dollar falls, the speculation will blow up in their faces.

But along comes Ben Bernanke, with an apparent change of brain. Now, says the captain of the Fed’s rapid response recession-fighting team, further inflation is unwelcome in the United States of America. Supposedly, these words alone took $5 off the global oil price.

But what really has changed? Can the U.S. central bank really begin fighting inflation in a serious way?

The feds have discovered the same two things that their Asian central banker colleagues have found out: that the globalization street goes both ways…and that Milton Friedman was right. Inflation is a monetary phenomenon, observed Friedman. When you increase the amount of money in circulation, ceteris paribus, prices are going to go up. That they didn’t go up much in the last 15 years is merely because there were important other trends going on – notably, globalization, which was driving down prices. But now, traffic on the Avenida de Globalization is going in the other direction. And just as it was very difficult to cause inflation while globalized markets were cutting prices, so is it very difficult to stop inflation when globalized markets are increasing them.

*** Can the Fed really begin fighting inflation? Ah, dear reader…do you see the cruel twist to the story?

While the Fed couldn’t seem to create inflation in those wonderful years of the Great Moderation…now, it probably can’t do much to stop it. The U.S. imports an Everest of stuff from overseas. And stuff made overseas is becoming more expensive. The Fed can raise rates to try to cool the U.S. economy and reduce the amount of stuff Americans buy. But those darned Asians and Europeans can still buy more, and prices can still go up.

Besides, any further ‘cooling’ of the U.S. economy is risky. It could freeze up.

The crisis is said to be over on Wall Street. But the Financial Times says new IPOs are being taken off the schedule…short action on Lehman Bros. is at a record level (speculators are betting that the company is going down) and Moody’s says it might downgrade credit ratings for MBIA and Ambac.

The money just isn’t flowing as fluidly in Manhattan as it used to. An AP story tells us that apartment sales were off 21% in the first quarter. And over on Long Island, where the Wall Streeters have their weekend homes, lenders are said to cutting off home equity lines.

In the center of the country, bankruptcy filings are up 27% in Illinois. And out in Las Vegas, the mortgage fraud capital of the world, a $5 billion casino project has just been cancelled.

And this just in – California is officially suffering a drought.

Under these conditions, we’d expect Ben Bernanke to make some gestures toward protecting the dollar and reducing inflation. But we’d also expect that most of the air coming from the Fed will be hot, not cold.

“The Fed seems to be trying to create a situation whereby they are seen to be fighting inflation, simply by not lowering rates any further,” says MoneyMorning. “This is because, while the Fed may have no interest in fighting inflation, they have a big interest in fighting what they call ‘inflationary expectations’. In other words, they are more interested in fighting people’s perception of the problem, rather than the problem itself.

Good day… And a Wonderful Wednesday to you! I had a long time friend – once a colleague and teammate on the company softball team – send me a note from Credit Suisse yesterday, that called for an end to the European currency strength versus the dollar. I love getting this stuff because, as they said in the Godfather… Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer… Yes, I like to see “their” side of the story.

In this case, it’s not too far off… While I think the European currencies, led by the euro (EUR), have more room to gain versus the dollar, you have to admit that the bulk of the euro’s gains are in the rear view mirror. But before everyone picks up their phones to call and sell their euros… WAIT! Think about this for a minute… The euro is the second most liquid currency in the world. It has taken over as the offset currency to the dollar. So… If the dollar were still going to weaken (which C.S. admitted it would), then the euro would see the offset trade. And… If the Asian currencies take over as the next shoe to drop for the dollar, as I’ve said they would for two years now, then the euro would see strength on the flip side of cross trades.

I’ve explained these cross trades before, but for the new readers, let’s review… Class, get out your #2 pencils… Currencies are traded in “pairs”. You are always shorting one currency and going long another currency. As U.S. investors, your base currency is dollars, so when you buy euros or yen (JPY), you are shorting the dollar and buying euros or yen. But U.S. investors aren’t the only players in this arena. You have investors around the world that have a different base currency… So you end up with “cross” trades – currencies that cross each other in this arena. Clear as mud? Sorry… This is the way I know how to explain it.

So… Euros, for instance, could gain in value due to people buying yen… On the crosses… And so on…

Alrighty then… I’m sure this will all sink in as you sink your teeth into your morning Honey Bun!

This morning, the euro has added to its gains from yesterday, as the German Business Confidence – as measured by the think tank, IFO – unexpectedly increased this month. I was all set to talk about the IFO being the more important measure of the German economy this morning, so… Let me go ahead and do just that! Yesterday, we saw weakness in the ZEW report on economic expectations… But that didn’t hurt the euro too much. The reason? The markets put more stock in the IFO report because it measures “current conditions” and therefore can be used as proxy for the European Central Bank (ECB) and their interest rates projections.

I saw a report on the IFO’s correlation with the euro’s past moves to higher ground… Made sense to me, as strong IFO reports came out right before the euro moved past previous big figures… Could certainly be the case again for the euro, eh?

So… The 1.56 level was taken out overnight, and as I write, the euro is trading well above the 1.57 level. Again, it’s too soon to tell if this is a “true reversal” of the sell off the past few weeks, or a false dawn… But to me, it certainly looks like we’re heading higher once again, and the negativism toward the U.S. dollar is slowly creeping back into the mindset of the markets.

The commodity currencies of Aussie (AUD), Canada (CAD), and Brazil (BRL) all “have it going for them” these days. Shoot Rudy, the Canadian loonie doesn’t even have the high interest rate like Aussie and Brazil, but with oil hitting $129 yesterday, it doesn’t seem to matter. I think that the markets have fully priced in one more rate cut from the Bank of Canada. With that out of the way, and commodities booming, the loonie could shake loose the pull down from the Bank of Canada!

I’ve heard a lot of talk about how people believe this commodity bull market is the latest “bubble”. Hmmm… That may be… But historically speaking, we’ve got a ways to go (time wise) before this bubble pops! Remember a month ago, when I kept telling you that the mass media didn’t know what they were talking about when they kept saying the bull market for commodities was over? I don’t hear these guys spouting off now. I wonder where they went? To hide under a rock?

I’m not going to dwell on this… But it just didn’t make sense to me that the bull market in commodities was over… And, now, we know why it didn’t make sense! Because it wasn’t over!

Second in command, Fed Head Kohn spoke yesterday, and sounded quite upbeat about the economy. Singing Ray Stevens… Everything is beautiful… What else did you expect? These guys have backed us into a corner that has three roads out… And none of them are a road to prosperity! 1. Inflation 2. Deflation 3. Stagflation… Oh… And they all merge with the recession highway!

Anyway… Fed Vice Chairman Kohn, speaking about interest rates said, “[it] appears to be appropriately calibrated for now to promote both rising employment and moderating inflation over the medium term.” The markets took this statement to mean Kohn was telling us that the Fed is unlikely to lower rates further.

Well… Baby, baby, it’s a wild world… And it’s hard to get by on just a smile. Kohn should be reminded of these words when the Fed comes back to the rate cut table later.

Speaking of the Fed… We’ll see the color of their last meeting minutes this afternoon. This was the meeting that they cut rates from 2.25% to 2%. I wonder if these meeting minutes will be in line with the press conference that was held after the rate cut… The reason I say this, is the suspicion I have toward the Fed after reading Bill Fleckenstein’s book, Greenspan’s Bubbles: The Age of Ignorance at the Federal Reserve.

The Fed will also be releasing their new growth and inflation forecasts. This ought to be worth the price of admission folks. What yarn will they spin for us? I’ll bet they tell us the future is so bright we gotta wear shades! And inflation? Don’t worry about it! Yeah, when the Fed says, “Don’t worry about it” you had better run for the hills!

How about gold? Did you see that rise in gold yesterday? When I left it was up over $15 on the day. The London Exchange issued a report showing that demand for gold was down 16% in the first quarter. That makes abundant sense given the losses gold put on the books in the first quarter… But now that the markets are coming to their senses, and the dollar is weaker (while oil continues to set records every day), gold is back in demand.

And speaking of gold… Remember about a month or so ago, I told you about how the dollar’s weakness had caused so much loss of purchasing power for us, and illustrated it with this: If you purchased oil with euros instead of dollars, the price increase in oil would represent 92%, which sounds high right? Well, since you don’t purchase your oil in euros, but dollars instead, your price increase represents a 319% gain! Well… To take this exercise one step further… If you had purchased your oil with gold, your price increase would be 57%! Now tell me again, how gold isn’t doing its part to provide an inflation hedge?