Bill Bonner (The Daily Reckoning, UK Edition):
The Dow fell slightly on Friday. Oil ended the week at $77. The dollar went nowhere.

But gold rose to a new high – $1,146. Today it’s hitting more new highs above $1,160…

Whatever else may be going on, there’s a real bull market in gold. It’s a bull market that began ten years ago. If you’d bought stocks then, you’d have about what you have now… less inflation. If you’d bought gold… you have about 4 times what you had then.

Today, a quick glance at a chart shows gold looking a little toppy. Expect a correction. But remember, this is a bull market. In a bull market, you buy the dips.

Stocks, meanwhile, are in a bear market. In a bear market, you sell the rallies. This looks like a good time to sell – if you haven’t done so already.

“Take Your Gains,” says Forbes. And once you’re out of stocks, stay out until the bear market is over… probably at around 3,000 – 5,000 on the Dow. When the price of gold equals the price of the Dow, it will be time to switch.

We haven’t seen the last of this bull market in gold. It’s what you buy when you think government is making a mess of the monetary situation. You put your trust in gold as an antidote… as protection… as wealth insurance.

Are the feds making a mess of the monetary situation? Oh dear, dear reader… please ask us something harder. Trillion dollar deficits as far as the eye can see… Stimulus spending that turns the US into a Zombie Economy… Handouts to the bankers… gifts to the carry traders…

The feds are out-doing themselves… more below…

As for the bear market on Wall Street, investors are counting on a miracle… a ‘recovery’ that doubles corporate earnings in just a couple years. They think it’s “just like 1982”. Of course, it is just the opposite of 1982… see the table below.

Besides, there is no recovery… and profits will go down, as businesses compete for less spending.

The recovery may be all in your head, writes Robert Shiller, in the New York Times:

“Consider this possibility: after all these months, people start to think it’s time for the recession to end. The very thought begins to renew confidence, and some people start spending again — in turn, generating visible signs of recovery. This may seem absurd, and is rarely mentioned as an explanation for mass behavior late in a recession, but economic theorists have long been fascinated by such a possibility.

“Back in 1931, for example, The New York Times attributed the emerging economic cataclysm to a “mood of pessimism which had been carried to grotesque extremes.” In 1932, it compared reckless talk about “depression” to shouting “fire” in a crowded theater.”

It doesn’t matter what anyone says. It’s a depression. It’s nothing like the garden-variety recessions of the Post-War period.

It’s a depression because of the nature of the work it has to do. It has to clean up 3 decades’ worth of filthy balance sheets.

Click here for the rest of Mr. Bonner’s insightful commentary at The Daily Reckoning, UK Edition.

U.S. data showed the number of U.S. workers filing new claims for jobless benefits rose slightly more than expected last week, but a gauge of underlying labor trends fell for a fifth straight week.

Spot gold was bid at $933.50 an ounce at 1311 GMT, against $929.00 an ounce late in New York on Wednesday. U.S. gold futures for August delivery on the COMEX division of the New York Mercantile Exchange rose $6.20 to $933.40 an ounce.

“If this is welcomed by the equities market and triggers a fresh boost, that could benefit gold,” said CMC Markets strategist Ashraf Laidi.

The dollar was down 0.39 percent at 79.3 against a basket of currencies and was lower against the euro following the data. Traders are now eyeing U.S. data on second-quarter GDP due on Friday for clues as to the next direction of the economy.

European shares rose as investors digested a raft of broadly positive corporate earnings, while U.S. stock futures extended gains after the jobs report.

Oil was also boosted by stock markets and rose above $64 a barrel. Firmer crude prices can support gold, which can be used as a hedge against oil-led inflation.

Gold demand in India, the world’s biggest bullion consumer, is recovering after recent price falls, but a further decline will be needed for buying to significantly recover.

“There are advance orders in decent quantities in the range of $900-920 an ounce,” said one dealer with a state-run bank.

Overall demand in India remains weak, however. The country’s gold imports have reached a provisional 8-10 tonnes in July so far, well below the 24 tonnes recorded last June, the Bombay Bullion Association said.

INVESTMENT SOFT

Investment demand for gold remained soft, however, as ETF holdings slipped further. Holdings of the largest bullion ETF, the SPDR Gold Trust, fell over 10 tonnes on Wednesday, and are down nearly 48 tonnes in the last four weeks.

Jason Toussaint, managing director for exchange-traded gold with the World Gold Council, said there was evidence investors were selling out of the SPDR fund to buy shares.

Analysts fear a broader liquidation of ETF gold holdings resulting from a recovery in risk appetite could jeopardise gold’s gains.

“Without strong physical demand to absorb metal coming back into the market and with funds cutting long exposure, the metal is at risk of a deeper correction,” said TheBullionDesk.com analyst James Moore.

On the supply side, the world’s largest gold producer, Barrick Gold , said it produced 1.87 million ounces of gold in the second quarter and is on track to meet its 2009 output target of 7.2-7.6 million ounces.

Among other precious metals, silver tracked gold up to $13.44 an ounce against $13.28. Spot platinum was at $1,177 an ounce against $1,170, while spot palladium was at $255 against $252.50

LONDON, July 30 (Reuters)

Good day… And a Marvelous Monday to you! A Home Run Derby Monday to boot! I have no Idea what’s going on this morning, as I just woke up, and it’s very late in the morning! I was very careful to set my alarm last night, and I’ve never been one of those people that hit the snooze button when it goes off, but here I am, waking up late… UGH!

So… I’m writing from home, and then I’ll shoot in to work… We’re short handed this week, so, I’m sure everyone will be arriving to the office, not see my car, and be a little ticked… So, I’ve got a surprise for them, something they’ve never seen… Me come in late!

Well… It looks like Risk is under pressure once again… And the only thing I can see that’s causing this Risk Aversion, is the Corporate Earnings Season… For instance we get 4 banks reporting this week, Goldman (yes, remember they’re a bank holding company now… They ex-chief, and ex-Treasury Sec. Paulson, made sure that the change was made so that Goldman would qualify for TARP last year!) We also have JP Morgan, Bank of America, and Citi…

Data wise, there are a few top shelf reports out this week, and the thought of them showing more dandelions instead of green shoots, is probably wearing heavily on the risk assets this morning too.

So… The euro is sitting just below 1.40 this morning at 1.3985, so no real harm being done at this time, but still the bias is to sell the risk assets like currencies and commodities as we start the week.

You know, I’ve harped about this for so long now, that I sound like a broken record, OOOPS! For the younger crowd that would be a scratched CD! What I’m talking about is the fact that the risk assets like currencies and commodities being thrown into the same barrel has stocks… And how I was just wishin’ and hopin’ and thinkin’ and prayin’ that we would return to the fundamentals of these asset classes not having anything in common with the stocks! I just knew… No wait, I can’t say that… I just knew, not that I know anything on the inside, that is… That stocks were going to be under pressure from the Corporate earnings season, and with the “link” still in place… That wouldn’t be good for currencies and commodities… Let’s hope I’m wrong!

The one piece of data we get today is the Budget Statement… Last month, the Budget Statement printed an awful deficit of -$189.7 Billion (May)… Historically, June prints at a surplus… But Historically, so did April, and April was no where near a surplus this year! Year-to-date receipts for the Gov’t are down 18%, and Year-to-date outlays are up 19%… That doesn’t bode well for “history to come into play here”…

Last week, on Thursday, reported Friday in the Pfennig (thanks Chris!) was the Weekly Initial Jobless Claims, which printed the lowest level for this data series in more than 6 months, at less than 600K! But still, the number is still staggering, and one of the reasons that Commercial construction in the U.S. is set to decline 16% this year, followed by a 12% fall in 2010. No jobs… no need to build offices for the “ghost jobs’ that the BLS adds each month, because… THEY DON’T EXIST!

No need to get me started on the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) this morning… I have to be clear and concise to get this out the door and me off to work!

Well… With the risk aversion back on the table… The two main beneficiaries remain to be Japanese yen and the U.S. dollar… Swiss francs are on the “kids table” but still a part of the beneficiary crowd…

The High Yielders like Aussie, kiwi, and South Africa get taken to the woodshed, when Risk Aversion comes to town… The Brazilian real is seeing a bias to sell, but for the most part has hung in there… Of course I remember saying that exact line early last fall, only to watch the real play catch up, until the turn-around in March of this year. So… I guess, what I’m saying is be careful!

So! Did you hear that Russian President Medvedev, showed off the “new world currency coin” at the G-8 meeting last week? He said.. “We are discussing both the use of other national currencies, including the ruble, as a reserve currency, as well as supranational currencies. So… Here it is! This is a symbol of our unity and our desire to settle such issues jointly.”

He then pulled a new coin out of his pocket and displayed to the attendees… Now… Don’t get all tied up and twisted over this at this point. This was simply a “symbolic” move, there aren’t mints all over the world rushing to get these coins minted and out the door… But, if you get the “symbolic” part, then you understand what Medvedev was attempting to do here… He was simply showing the G-8 attendees that if they really thought about it, they could see the need to move from a dollar reserve system, and to help them visualize it, he had a coin to pass around!

I can’t believe that right now, with the whispering campaign to get an alternative reserve currency, that the dollar isn’t getting sold, as I like to say, like funnel cakes at a State Fair! I guess the whispering will have to get louder, for this to make any real waves….

You know, I’m not for this “global currency”… I just wanted to make that clear! I’m not for removing the dollar as the reserve currency, for I know all of the “perks” that go along with it being the reserve currency! I’m just here to report the facts, and give my opinion / market commentary on how I think it will affect things…

I do believe, however, that given our deficit spending, and every growing to the moon National Debt, that the dollar deserves getting whacked, it’s how things are done! Treasuries will get their comeuppance too one day… You can’t just keep printing and printing and thinking that “buyers” will be there at the auction every time you print more… It’s not going to happen that way… At least in my thoughts it won’t!

OK… Time to go to the Big Finish… I know, I know, little shorter than usual this morning… But Hey! It was still chock-full-o-news!

Currencies today 7/13/09: A$ .7750, kiwi .6225, C$ .8605, euro 1.3980, sterling 1.61, Swiss .9240, rand 8.2930, krone 6.4830, SEK 7.9025, forint 198.10, zloty 3.1475, koruna 18.62, yen 92.10, sing 1.4650, HKD 7.75, INR 49.08, China 6.8328, pesos 13.71, BRL 1.9965, dollar index 80.16, Oil $59.96, 10-yr 3.30%, Silver $12.50, and Gold… $912.70

That’s it for today… Went to the Futures Game yesterday, to sit through a 4-hour rain delay… UGH! Let’s hope the rain stays away for the next two days! Home Run Derby tonight, All-Star Game tomorrow night. The family is all going to the Fan-Fest today, while I’m at work… Hey! Somebody has to work! HAHAHAHAHA! My beloved Cardinals went into the All-Star Game break on a good note, winning 6 of 10 on the road trip to end the 1st half of the season… This will be a very busy week for me, lots of writing to get done, and all the All-Star festivities… I go to my new oncologist this afternoon for the results of my scans on Friday, so all that and doctors stuff on top! UGH! Oh well, next Monday I head to Vancouver for the Agora Financial Wealth Symposium, their 10th year anniversary of the conference! And then I head off to vacation! So… Busy, busy, busy… Time to hit send, Hope your Monday is absolutely Marvelous I tell you!

Source:  Back To Risk Aversion!

Caution was the order of the day, with the dollar rising against the euro in a seesaw session in which risk tolerance rose and then fell as investors weighed the outlook for growth and corporate earnings.

Data showed orders in Germany, Europe’s largest economy, rose at the strongest monthly pace in nearly two years in May. But economists said the yearly comparison would remain weak for some time.

Euro zone government bond prices fell and the Bund future retreated from seven-week peaks as heavy European supply of almost 14 billion euro cut safety bids for bonds.

Another decline on Wall Street rekindled a safety bid for U.S. government debt, offsetting worries about demand for this week’s sale of $73 billion in bonds.

Tumbling energy shares dragged down European and U.S. equity markets as oil fell more than 2 percent, pressured by investors’ caution over recovery and an expected increase in gasoline stocks during the heart of the U.S. driving season.

Exxon Mobil Corp fell 1.7 percent and Chevron Corp dropped 1.3 percent in U.S. trading, while Royal Dutch Shellshed 0.75 percent and Total lost 1.2 percent in Europe.

“The markets are in a consolidation mode,” said Andrew Bell, head of research at Rensburg Sheppards. “To propel the markets higher, we have got to see evidence of the turning point in earnings and of the recovery and economic growth moving from less bad to a little bit better.”

At 1:30 p.m. EDT (1730 GMT), the Dow Jones industrial average was down 67.41 points, or 0.81 percent, at 8,257.46. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index was off 6.44 points, or 0.72 percent, at 892.28. The Nasdaq Composite Index lost 18.77 points, or 1.05 percent, at 1,768.63.

Disappointing UK industrial output data pulled shares lower in London, with utilities among top European decliners.

The FTSEurofirst 300  index of top European shares closed 0.8 percent lower at 826.36 points. The FTSE 100 closed down 7.91 points at 4,817, a fresh two-month low.

British manufacturing output unexpectedly fell 0.5 percent in May, official data showed, making it less likely the economy returned to growth in the second quarter.

Copper prices turned negative as concerns over demand and world growth persisted. Copper for three-months delivery in London traded at $4,930 a tonne.

Gold erased earlier gains to trade near break-even as the dollar recovered lost ground against a basket of currencies, reducing the precious metal’s appeal as an alternative asset.

Spot gold prices rose 20 cents to $924.20 an ounce and the U.S. Dollar Index  was up 0.25 percent at 80.584.

The euro was down 0.23 percent at $1.3942, while against the yen, the dollar fell 0.56 percent to 94.83.

An expected increase in U.S. gasoline stocks for the week ended July 3, ahead of the long U.S. Independence Day holiday weekend, pressured oil.

“Consumer confidence is weighed down by higher retail prices and rising unemployment and so the number of Americans taking to the road over the holiday weekend was probably lower than last year,” said Harry Tchilinguirian, senior oil analyst with BNP Paribas.

The benchmark interbank cost of borrowing euros fell to a new low on Tuesday as a banking system flush with funds remained reluctant to lend money into the real economy.

The benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note was up 11/32 in price to yield 3.47 percent. The 2-year U.S. Treasury note was little changed, yielding 0.94 percent.

Asian stocks edged up slightly but struggled, with the MSCI index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan rising 0.4 percent. Japan’s Nikkei share average <.N225> dipped 0.3 percent as a stronger yen hit exporter shares.

NEW YORK, July 7 (Reuters)

As much as I would like to see the recovery turn into sustained growth, I have to agree with Rick Pendergraft’s article a few weeks ago that this rally will soon run out of steam.

The reason is a bit different than Rick’s however. Looking at the charts, instead of the potential inverse head-and-shoulders that Rick points to, my reasoning is a little less fancy.

“Sell in May and go away”. As corny as it may seem, there is some merit to the old saying.

Here’s a chart of the last 5 years with June 1st denoted with a red bar and Sept. 1st denoted with a blue bar.

As you can see, the market goes virtually nowhere between June 1st and Sept. 1st. The moves each year were as follows:

2004: -3.3%
2005:  -0.08%
2006:  1.8%
2007: -1.6%
2008:  -7.8%

Unfortunately, things don’t look good for this rally. Expect sideways movement at best for the next few months, but more than likely a slide as Rick mentioned.

Source:  Will The Rally Last?

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) reports tomorrow (Tuesday), while JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) reports Thursday, and Citigroup Inc (C) reports on Friday.

While the chief executives of several of the largest U.S. banks were quick to announce favorable showings for the first two months of the year, analysts are concerned that the strong showings may not have carried over into March, and that the performances of some of these money-centered banks may disappoint.

Contradictions hit the financials last week as diverse reports about Morgan Stanley (MS) and Wells Fargo brought even more confusion to a sector that cannot seem to stay out of the daily headlines. On one hand, analysts expect Morgan Stanley to write down an additional $1.2 billion worth of bonds; subsequently, the firm may suffer its second straight quarterly loss.

On the other hand, Wells Fargo expects earnings to far surpass Wall Street’s projections as its Wachovia Corp. acquisition has enhanced its mortgage-lending capabilities at a time when rates are at historic lows and when the U.S. housing market is showing some signs – be they ever so slight – of rebounding [Indeed, a Money Morning report from just last week made this same point].

Bear in mind that since the financials have led the charge in equities during the past five weeks, investors may be looking for any excuse to take some recent profits.  Intel Corp. (INTC), which reports tomorrow, Google Inc (GOOG), which reports Thursday and General Electric Corp. (GE), which reports Friday, figure to be crucial announcements.

The March inflation gauges highlight the economic calendar, and economists hope that price pressures remain far off of their radar screens.  The retail sales data should lend a bit more insight into the current plight of the consumer.

Market Matters

Alcoa Corp. (AA) kicked off earnings season with more of whimper than a bang.  While the aluminum producing giant lost about $500 million during the quarter, the company expects to benefit from the infrastructure programs promoted in the economic stimulus package – key areas that could enhance demand for its products.  Bed Bath and Beyond Inc. (BBBY) reported better-than-expected quarterly results and even received a favorable analyst upgrade.

With the season set to kick off in a big way in the weeks to come, Thomson Reuters has called for a 37% drop in profits at Standard & Poor’s 500 Index companies, the eighth consecutive quarterly decline (though that prediction came before the Wells announcement).

Economically Speaking

A light week on the calendar still provided plenty of headlines on the economic home front last week.  Corporate executives painted a rather bleak picture of the short-term future for U.S. industry as the Business Roundtable issued a quarterly outlook that turned negative for the first time in its survey’s history.  The majority of those participating expect their companies to experience layoffs and reductions in business spending during the coming six months.

However, Roundtable Chairman Harold McGraw III, who is also the CEO of The McGraw-Hill Cos. Inc. (MHP), expressed confidence in the Obama administration’s ability to generate renewed business activity. McGraw said he also believes the economy may be close to a bottom.

On the other hand, minutes from the latest U.S. Federal Open Market Committee policymaking meeting that U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and friends revised their expectations (to the downside) for the economic recovery. While they anticipate that gross domestic product (GDP) will flatten (from its current contraction state) by the end of the year, unemployment is expected to continue its downward spiral well into 2010.

Though initial claims for unemployment benefits surprisingly fell last week, they remain at very high levels, and total claims (those looking for jobs over extended periods) jumped to a record high. While the trade deficit narrowed to its lowest level since November 1999, the improvement is more indicative of the sluggish economy and the reduced global demand for any and all goods and services.

Retailers posted their results of March sales and the numbers were mixed at best.  While Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT) had long been the one “steady Eddie” during this economic downturn, the world’s largest retailer reported March sales that missed expectations (though the company does expect its quarterly results to be strong, thanks to a stellar February).  Stores that target teens like Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF), Aeropostale Inc. (ARO) and American Eagle Outfitters (AEO) each posted disappointing numbers, though analysts point out that Easter (and many spring breaks) fall later in the 2009 calendar (April 12 this year versus March 23 a year ago) and most holiday shoppers are waiting until the last minute these days.

Still, more than 50% of those retailers reporting beat Wall Street expectations, and some even issued favorable guidance for the quarter as a whole.  Of note, The TJX Cos. Inc. (TJX) (TJ Maxx and Marshalls) and Penney Co. Inc. (JCP) both posted better-than-expected sales results and increased their outlooks for the three-month period.

Weekly Economic Calendar

Source:  As Earnings Season Heats Up, U.S. Banks Will Make or Break the Stock-Market Rally

These delectable little guys are usually served steamed, with a splash of soy sauce. When China’s booming like it was in recent years, shoppers are hard-pressed to find a store that can keep them on the shelves. And at 720RMB, or $420HK (about $60 U.S.), that’s no small feat for a palm-sized morsel. They’re expensive, and taste great.

A hairy crab, if you’ve never seen one, is usually a bit smaller than the Dungeness crabs many Americans are more familiar with. These freshwater crustaceans start to fatten as soon as the autumn chill cools the Yangtze River Delta. That adds to their taste and desirability.

When China’s feeling pinched, hairy crab sales drop and prices plummet. At the moment, hairy crab prices are off by more than 80%, which is a steeper drop than during the Asian Financial Crisis a decade ago, or during the SARS epidemic in 2003. After the best sales in history last year, that’s significant because of what falling hairy crab sales imply about the state of China’s economy at a time when it is struggling to stave off the effects of a global recession and growth may drop to the slowest pace China’s seen in nearly a decade.

Since hairy crabs are a luxury both in the home and at restaurants, the falling prices suggest that people are “eating cheaper.” Rather than ordering up haute cuisine – including hairy crabs – at such restaurants as Cuisine Cuisine in the International Financial Centre (IFC) Tower, or the famous Jumbo Floating Restaurant in Hong Kong Harbor, most Chinese are eating “cheap” and seem to prefer smaller, more modest places these days.

They’re also apparently “shopping cheap,” too. Call it a Chinese version of the “Wal-Mart Effect” (WM), but that’s what’s happening as savvy Chinese consumers downshift. They’re still spending – as reflected by Chinese retail sales figures, which suggest year-over-year growth of 21% in 2008 – but they’re spending differently.

Nowhere is this change more evident than in those stores where luxury items are sold. Shanghai and Hong Kong store managers I’ve spoken with recently told me privately that such big-ticket brand names as Dior, Chanel, Hermes and others aren’t moving as fast as they were a year ago.

Knock-offs, of course, are still flying off the shelves.

On a related note, many Chinese merchants are actually refusing to take credit cards these days, at least from Chinese consumers. Don’t think for a minute this is limited to convenience store items, either. Big-ticket items like tours and holiday excursions that have long been paid for on credit are now cash or check only as many travel companies – like Hong Kong’s Sincere International Travel Service Co. Ltd. – look to avoid getting caught short.

Many merchants say that banks are hoarding cash and delaying payments on personal credit cards. While no banks would comment officially in response to my inquiries, it’s clear that Chinese lenders are dumping riskier credit-card holders just like their Western banking brethren. Only faster.

Unlike their Western cousins, for whom credit has been a bonanza, Chinese banks have only relatively recently gotten into the credit game after being so cash-centric that the rest of the world’s bankers viewed China’s lenders as antiquated. But now that generation of cautiousness is paying off.

Chinese banks are apparently also going the extra mile to ensure they don’t get burned. Lenders are making credit-card transactions as unattractive as possible for the merchants who process the charge slips and they’re doing so by using the most effective tool of all – delayed payments.

Only a year ago, most banks paid credit-card transactions in 14 days. But now, according to reports by CNN and other news outlets, it’s not uncommon for a merchant to have to wait 20, 40 or even 90 days to get paid. And that obviously affects cash flow at a time when luxury businesses in China are already under pressure.

This all speaks to something we at Money Morning have talked about repeatedly over the past 12 months: Investing in China is not about luxury as so many investors have mistakenly thought. It’s about the basics. To be sure, luxury items and top-shelf brands have enjoyed a heyday in China that coincides with the dramatic growth spurt the country has experienced in recent years. But luxury brands are hardly the key to steady growth and profits over the long term.

That mantle, instead, belongs to much more basic industries, such as power-generation, railway-and-infrastructure construction, water filtration, and pollution control. All will benefit substantially from China’s $583 billion stimulus package, which is designed to fuel growth that not only benefits the economy, but also staves off social unrest, which is what Beijing’s power elite fears the most. To China’s Politburo, running out of power is a far more significant risk than running out of Gucci.

So for investors who are interested in grabbing the best that the Red Dragon offers while avoiding the risks there, hairy crabs are yet another harbinger of where and how to invest in China in 2009.

If You Want a Forecast for China’s Economy, Ask a Hairy Crab

Immediately, I think to the Price-to-Earnings ratio of the S&P 500 index, as shown in Barron’s, and sure enough, earnings have been trending down for the entire year, which is, of course, bad news, as is proved when you see that the market value of the S&P 500 is down by about half in the last year, meaning that if you owned the stocks in the S&P 500 for the last year, then you have lost half of your money, and you are probably plenty upset!

So you would think that, you know, the P/E ratio would have fallen, especially since the prices of the stocks in the index (which are the P in the P/E ratio) have fallen by half, and you have lost half your damned money, about which you are still plenty peeved.

But surprise! Even though the S&P 500 index itself has fallen from about 1,590 a year ago (with a P/E of 18.9) to where the index is actually down by about half, earnings are down by half, too!

So this means that although the company made half as much money, and you, the hapless investor, lost half of your money investing in their stocks, both the P and the E went down, and thus the Price-to-Earnings ratio is still at an elevated 19! It’s actually higher! Hahaha!

Anyway, the point is that this current Price-to-Earnings ratio of 19 for the S&P 500 index is so high (audience shouts out, “How high, Mogambo?”) that it is still near where, historically, the market soon started down in a huge bear market, and is still high even after losing half its value! Gaaaah! I’m scared!

In fact, you can still have a high P/E of 19, indicating a high price, even if the earnings of the entire S&P 500 fell to a measly 1-cent and the shares in the index sold for a collective 19 cents! Hahaha! It’s weird!

You can tell by their faces that they are aghast that I would be ruining their presentation with my stupidities, and so they immediately get away from P/E ratios altogether, and instead turn to consumption and interest rates, whereupon they write, “consumers have started a spending strike, so any business that sells to them is heading into a huge headwind. This in itself is probably enough to do the damage but there’s more. Credit markets are at worst, closed and at best, much more expensive”, which they prove by noting, “Spreads for investment grade corporate bonds are 550 basis points over treasuries; even worse, junk bonds are a huge 20 percentage points above treasuries.”

They then cite a statistic that I have never heard of before, perhaps because I am an ignorant and stupid guy, but I was surprised to learn that “Looking forward, companies have no option but to slash capital expenditure, which is to say, slash other companies’ earnings, a vicious spiral that carries with it so much potential consequence that the Markit iTraxx Crossover Index is above 1000 for the first time since it was created, inferring that a record…number of companies are on the verge of default.”

Now, naturally I have no idea what in the hell any of this means, but I am always very interested in indicators that are in record territory, and I am willing to believe anything bad after hearing the words “on the verge of default”.

Then I remember that I am in gold, and I am calmed. Whew!

Of course, I’ll be ecstatic when gold zooms in price in response to such fiscal and monetary madness, but right now I am calmed. But really looking forward to ecstasy! And at these rates of monetary insanity, it can’t be far away! Whee!

Source: Markets Get an ‘F’ in P/E

Business sales are down a couple of percent, factory shipments are down a couple of percent – which may explain why electric power is down about one percent – and all kinds of stuff are down, except, of course, the damned government payrolls.

Even retail sales are down 2.8% from September, and down a whopping 4.1% in the last 12 months. And as bad as that 4% drop is, Anthony M. Cherniawski of The Practical Investor newsletter notes that it is worse than it appears, as “these prices are not adjusted for price changes in the past year”, and if you look at the year-over-year 4.9% inflation statistic from the Department of Labor, as he did, then “That means retail sales, adjusted for inflation, are down 7.6%” in the last 12 months! Gaaahhh!

If people aren’t buying stuff, then this may have something to do with what I saw at Chartoftheday.com. They write, “It has been said that earnings drive the market. That may be so, but it has been the ongoing financial crisis that has driven earnings – off a cliff.”

And since, when examining my whole life, I can be characterized as “a paranoid, xenophobic, penny-pinching little tightwad, armed-and-dangerous gold-bug bastard going off the deep end again”, I am particularly attuned to other things that are “going off a cliff.” So I run to the tables in Barron’s, and I see that the earnings of the S&P500 – the 500 biggest corporations in the country – went down again last week to $46.10 from $51.37, a drop of about 10%! And $46.10 is a long, long, LONG way down from the $84.92 they made last year! Earnings have been cut almost in half! Wow!

And looking even more long-term, earnings of the S&P500 are back to where they were in 2000! Hahaha!

Naturally, being a scared and paranoid-yet-disagreeable little man who grows more so with every tick of the clock, I was trying to think of something clever to write that would convey both my Utter Mogambo Contempt (UMC) at anyone who thought that investing in the stock market over the long term was a good idea, and my Utter, Utter Mogambo Contempt (UUMC) at anyone who thought that placing all their retirement eggs in the stock market was a good idea.

This, of course, leads me to how the monstrous Alan Greenspan, while chairman of the abomination known as the Federal Reserve, irresponsibly created all the money and credit that allowed such rampant inflation in the prices of assets, so much so and for so long that it made such “invest for the long-term” idiocy actually seem possible; and then that naturally leads me to how Greenspan could not have done it without the despicable educational system graduating students who rank at the bottom of the world, the despicable news media for their gullibility and ignorance, and the despicable Congress in general (and Sen. Christopher Dodd and Rep. Barney Frank in particular) for being so stupid, incompetent and worthless as to allow the Federal Reserve to commit such monetary villainy, which naturally leads me to how even all these execrable halfwits, together, could not have done it if the damnable Supreme Court had not bizarrely ruled that FDR was allowed to corrupt the dollar by substituting a fiat currency instead of the strictures of the Constitution’s Article 1, Section 10 that mandated that only “gold and silver coin” will be money.

Then, predictably overwhelmed by the enormity of such supreme stupidity and total failure, I am soon angry and outraged, again yelling, “Damn them! Damn them all!”, shouting out revolutionary slogans and ranting, “To the bunkers! We’re freaking doomed, you morons!”

It was not until later that I learned that Chartoftheday.com also had a comment about the idea of “investing for the long-term” using these earnings numbers as a springboard, but which was a lot more calm, more nuanced, and classy, even though I could feel the marrow congeal in your bones when I read, “Altogether not a historically high number considering that it is merely 19% greater than where earnings were back in 1966.”

But I suppose it all proves, for the umpteenth time in history, that you cannot achieve prosperity by printing money, as James Grant, of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer makes perfectly clear in his article at online.wsj.com when he writes, “partly because there was no external check on monetary expansion, debt grew much faster than the income with which to service it. Since 1983, debt has expanded by 8.9% a year, GDP by 5.9%. The disparity in growth rates may not look like much, but it generated a powerful result over time. Over the 25 years, total debt – private and public, financial and non-financial – has risen by $45.1 trillion, GDP by only $10.9 trillion.”

And now total debt is north of 350% of GDP, the highest ever, and with a federal government putting us on the hook for another accrued $95 trillion or so in promised future benefits for which they will cause the necessary money to be created, then if that is not a Damned Good Reason (DGR) reason to buy gold, then nothing is! Whee! This investing stuff is easy!

Source: Corporate Earnings Go Cliff Diving

Investors will be utterly confused today about what to fear most. First, you had the nightmare open in New York on Friday. The futures markets were limit down and closed briefly. By the time order was restored to electronic markets, the Dow opened down 6%.

The Dow rallied-if you can call it that-to close down “just” 3.6% on the day. A that point, you could safely say the market was ‘pricing in’ the fear of a global recession, and just what that would mean for corporate earnings. Not even an oil price of US$65-meaning lower prices at the pump-could cheer investors.

And then, this weekend, European and Asian leaders met and, “pledged to undertake effective and comprehensive reform of the international monetary and financial systems,” according to Bloomberg. China’s Premier summed up the argument for the 40 heads of state present by saying, “we need even more financial regulation to ensure financial safety.”

And thus a great debate unfolds in the weeks ahead of the November 15th G20 summit in Washington. Was the crisis a result of unregulated “cowboy capitalism”? Or did it have its roots in phony, government-regulated interest rates, which skewed corporate and personal incentives in favour of debt-based speculation? More that in a moment.

Did you see news reports that the RBA intervened in the currency markets? The Bank is trying to prevent the Aussie dollar from going “splat!” Truly, there are few currencies in the world that have fallen so much, so quickly. But why?

Chatting with Swarm Trader Gabriel Andre this morning, he said the seven-year up-trend in the Aussie-Yen currency pair has been completely reversed in the last three months. Kris Sayce will be running Gabriel’s comments in today’s Money Morning. What does it mean?

The currency pair is as good a symbol as any for what fuelled the global rise in speculation. You could borrow virtually for free in yen and invest in high-yielding currencies and assets. Those assets included Aussie stocks and the Aussie currency itself. The collapse of the yen and dollar carry trades is what’s behind the plummeting Aussie dollar.

Meanwhile, the government still hasn’t fixed the problem that’s mushrooming in the cash and mortgage fund market. Over $11 billion is still frozen in those accounts as the firms that run them try to work out a deal with the government. But what deal could there really be?

Investments in mortgage funds are not deposits in banks. By guaranteeing bank deposits, the government drew attention to the fact that investments always have risks, and that some risks cannot be insured against. You either take them and accept the risk (in exchange for the return), or you keep your cash in a safer, but lower-yielding security (or in cash, subject to inflation).

It would be nice if you could get a guarantee in life that you’d never lose money no matter what kind of decision you made. But no such guarantee exists. It just happens that we live in an age where no one expects to lose at anything, ever. This goes for kid’s soccer games as well as financial markets. But if there aren’t real winners and losers, you don’t have a real market.

Congratulations to our friends at www.businessspectator.com.au. The financial news and analysis site is turning one year old this week. It’s a precocious one-year old, though. And there is a lot of collected wisdom there.

For instance, Robert Gottliebsen recently made this chilling observation about the hedge fund meltdown, “The mortgage fund freeze has escalated the number of superannuation investors who are demanding to exit the managed fund equity system. At the moment it is containable but if the move to quit shares balloons we will see big forced selling of Australian stocks.”

Hopefully the mortgage freeze will end soon. Perpetual says this morning that it would like to end its freeze on redemptions as soon as possible. Exactly when that is is anybody’s guess.

As if the credit crunch and a global recession weren’t bad enough, investor now have to deal with calls by the Europeans and Asians for Bretton Woods two. Everyone wants a new global financial system. But it’s not like buying a new shower head or toilet seat, is it? You can’t just run down to the shops and get one, along with some beef jerky.

It’s obvious the current system is breaking down. Globalisation-made possible by cheap money and cheap energy-is contracting. You know for certain that governments, being blame artists, will blame markets. But it’s not the market’s fault. As with every bubble, from Tulips to the South Seas to the Mississippi Scheme, it’s people who pervert markets.

Sure, CEOs and corporations turned normal businesses into vehicles for private speculation. But that is a failure of management, not the market. More oversight by corporate boards and shareholders might have made for better discipline in risk taking. But discipline is exactly what people lose in a bubble.

The credit bubble was remarkable because it leveraged the interconnectedness of global markets, allowing investors to borrow in weak currencies and invest in high-risk, high-yield assets. It wasn’t a regional or even national bubble. It was the whole planet.

But in its other essential features, it is indistinguishable from previous bubbles, manias, panics, and crashes. One of those features in fact, is how governments and bad regulations actually enlarge, prolong, and generally abet the bubble. And in this one, because everyone had a stake in its expansion, everyone has tried to keep it going. The best example of this is the determined allegiance to the dollar-pegged world financial system.

The price of money is fixed by central banks via interest rates. For years, everyone followed the Fed’s lead in the U.S. and set the price of money below rate of consumer price inflation. Australian mined. China produced. Europe traded. OPEC pumped. The U.S. spent.

Global bubbles in all asset classes ensued. That is a failure of the highest order by the regulators of global interest rates. Now politicians see massive wealth destruction and blame free markets for screwing things up when it was the non-market price of money that touched off the crisis to begin with.

In any event, we’re going to get some sort of hogwash in the next month from the confab in DC. There will be more supervision of banks. It will probably lead to less bank lending and tighter credit. Hedge funds will be regulated. Many investors will anticipate this by taking their money out ahead of time. Redemptions will force more asset sales. Stocks will fall.

The International Monetary Fund will probably enjoy some enhanced status. The IMF is already bailing out a bankrupt Iceland. It will loan US$16.5 billion to Ukraine. Before it’s all over, we reckon Japan and China might even consent to loaning some of their huge dollar reserves to the IMF in exchange…for something.

We’re not sure what it would be yet. The IMF may become a super-bank with access to funding from central banks, a kind of supra-sovereign wealth fund in the service of a world government and regulation. That sounds…not encouraging.

Also, keep in mind that the entire strain of the crisis in the U.S. was generated by a politically desirable outcome in residential housing. The original mis-allocation of investment dollars came about because politicians insisted that banks make loans to people who couldn’t repay them. Market discipline was actively subverted by political opportunism.

The U.S. set up Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE) with preferential borrowing terms so those two could buy up mortgages originated by the banks. The banks could sell the mortgages quickly, which put them in the position to fund even more mortgages and expand “home ownership” in America.

We all know how that’s working out. Median U.S. house prices continue to fall. The loans made to finance those homes are going bad. The securities made up of bundles of those mortgages are rotting, taking bank capital with them. And insurance sold against default in them is putting the sellers of that insurance into great difficulty.

Europe, for its part, has a brewing problem in emerging market debt. Austrian banks are exposed to sovereign emerging market debt to the tune of 85% of GDP. Swiss banks have emerging market debt equivalent to 50% of GDP. It’s 25% in Sweden, 25% in the U.K., and 23% in Spain. If more emerging markets go the way of Iceland and default on debt or go bankrupt, Europe’s banking system faces major trouble. Just what we needed. More trouble.

Dan Denning
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

Source: Europe Faces Day of Reckoning in Emerging Market Debt