That’s because wealthy populations tend to eat more meat than poor ones, while also eating more fresh fruits and veggies. The diet becomes more diverse, less centered on consuming base grains.

The demand for grains doesn’t diminish, though, because the need to produce meat increases the demand for grains exponentially. Depending on who’s doing the math, five to ten pounds of grain goes into every pound of beef that lands on a dinner plate.

China’s population is also increasing, of course, which is further boosting demand for grains. There are some special issues with China, too. It holds only 10% of the world’s arable land, but 20% of the population. And its arable land resource is in decline. There were about 121 million hectares in service at the end of 2008. That’s down from 133 million hectares as recently as 1988. Increasingly, because of water shortages, desertification, development, urban migration, pollution and a host of other reasons, China is growing less of its own food and relying more on foreign suppliers.

The Chinese government is not happy about that trend and has made food production a priority. In fact, recently, the Chinese premier laid out a number of goals for China:

• Boost Chinese grain production by 50 million tonnes by focusing on increasing the yield per acre
• Subsidize agriculture – which the government does by giving farmers subsidies for irrigation equipment and new seeds and for improving crop yields and crop quality
• Invest in the infrastructure of agriculture – for water supplies, roads and the like.

So it would seem a good idea to be around Chinese agriculture in some way.

Let’s back up a bit and look again at how the dietary pattern has changed. I’ve written about how China consumes a lot more grains before. China is now also one of the largest consumers of fruits and vegetables.

That China is now a consumer of size in the world of fruits and veggies is a relatively new development. China is also a big producer of fruits and veggies. According to the FAO, China produces nearly half of the world’s vegetables and 16% of the world’s fruit. China is today a major exporter of these goods to other Asian countries, supplanting U.S. suppliers.

Well, fruits and veggies have an interesting angle when it comes to fertilizers…

You know if you’ve been reading this letter that the three main nutrients are nitrogen, phosphate and potash. Farmers use fertilizers to boost yields and improve crop quality. Perhaps not surprisingly, China is the largest consumer of fertilizers in the world, with about 25% of global demand.

China is self-sufficient in nitrogen and phosphate. As a result, its application rates are on par with those of farmers in Europe and America. But China is not self-sufficient in potash. The country has few developed potash mines. As a result, it consumes around 12-15 million tonnes per year, but produces only 3 million tones.

Therefore, China relies on imports of potash to obtain most of its supply. But Chinese farmers could use a lot more of this unique fertilizer. In fact, China’s potash “application rates” are half what they are in the West. Quite simply, the Chinese need to use more potash to boost their crop yields to where the U.S. and Europe are.

Potash is an important nutrient because it controls the plants’ water intake, reduces water loss, increases root growth and improves drought resistance. Clearly, crop yields are higher and crop quality is better with the application of potash.

Yet last year, China’s consumption of potash fell. It will probably decline slightly again this year. That’s incompatible with the goals – and the need – of increasing crop yields and quality.

Potash prices soared in 2008 and Chinese farmers pushed back by buying less. The price of potash is cheaper now, but not by all that much. In any event, the Chinese farmers can afford it, as the economic return from using potash is compelling. This two-year decline in potash consumption is unprecedented. And its effects on crop yields and production will not be good.

Most of the potash suppliers that deal in the Chinese markets believe that Chinese demand will pick up later this year as the Chinese burn through their existing inventories of potash and look forward to the 2010 planting season. The Chinese will be hard-pressed to match the record production of 2008 without potash. The quirky thing about potash is that it tends to stay in the soil and you can skip a year, maybe even two, but no more than that.

So potash is also going to be a good way to invest in China’s food story. But there is another layer here.

You see, you can’t use potash directly to grow fruits and veggies. These crops – tomatoes, avocados, melons, etc. – are sensitive to chloride and salt. So you have to modify the potash and remove the chlorine. These potash-based fertilizers, potassium sulphate (SOP) and potassium nitrate (NOP), are ideal for fruits and veggies.

As it turns out, you also need SOP and NOP to grow tobacco. Tobacco is fussy about what fertilizer it will take without messing up its taste or combustibility. It also needs a lot of potash. Yet again, chlorine is a detriment. Chlorine makes the leaves taste sour and can destroy the commercial value of a crop. As with fruits and veggies, you need SOP and NOP.

Selling SOP and NOP to China’s tobacco farmers is also a good business. For one thing, China has the largest population of smokers on the planet, some 350 million. Since potash represents less than 1% of the cost of making cigarettes, the tobacco growers are less price sensitive. What they really want is a quality product consistently delivered.

One of the companies I’m following is the largest producer of SOP and NOP in China and serves both the fruit and veggie market and the tobacco growers. But there are really many ways to get a hand in the Chinese agricultural story. Watch this space.

Source: Buy What China Buys, Part II

This from The Rude Awakening:

We have it comparatively easy in this, the crisis of 2008. We may have to make do with fewer Swatch watches and Coach handbags. We may have to pass on the latest iPod and make do with last year’s winter coat. These hardships are not important, except for people selling those goods. But the credit crisis is also affecting the world’s ability to produce one thing important to everyone: food.

It’s harder for farmers to get credit for next season’s crop, especially farmers overseas. They need fertilizer, seed, fuel and more. And most farmers need to borrow money to obtain these essential items. No credit; no crops.

Therefore, the global credit squeeze might reduce plantings of key grains, even as world inventories of these grains hover near historic lows. In Russia, for example, cash-starved banks have cut off funding for the industry. The head of the Russian Grain Union says, “Many farmers probably won’t be able to borrow money for the spring sowing.” This is important because Russia is no lightweight in the grain division. It produces 9% of the world’s wheat, for instance. No surprise that the United Nations considers Russia a critical component of the global food supply.

Ironically, Russia just had its best harvest ever. And still, global grain inventories remain low. Bloomberg reports that global inventories of corn, wheat and soybeans are the second lowest they’ve ever been since 1974.

A number of countries already fear what might happen next year. The Washington Post Foreign Service in Shanghai reports that China adopted a number of measures to protect itself from the worsening food crisis: “Among the most extreme measures [China] took was to impose new export taxes to keep critical supplies such as grains and fertilizers from leaving the country.”

These taxes are extremely high, on the order of 150%-185%. China worries that richer countries may outbid its own farmers for supplies and weaken China’s own food supply. One Chinese fertilizer company, which produces 150,000 tons per year, already said that the new taxes mean exporting is no longer profitable.
China was the biggest exporter of certain types of fertilizer. No longer. That’s a lot of supply off the market.

Fertilizers are absolutely critical in maintaining (and improving) crop yields. Without them, we’d produce far less per acre. As a result, in parts of Africa where people depend on Chinese fertilizers, the food supply problem is now more acute. China’s export taxes and bans follow those of other grain producers, including the Ukraine, India, Pakistan and Argentina.

Amazingly, despite these various maneuvers around the world to prevent grain exports, the prices for wheat, corn and soybeans are all half of their mid-summer highs. It seems the market believes a global recession will dampen demand. Maybe so, or maybe the market doesn’t know anything. The severe commodity selloff during the last few weeks might be saying a lot more about the desperation of hedge fund managers to raise cash than about the prospect that grain demand will fall – in which case, we could see another surge in prices next year.

Demand for grains is still very strong. In China, each wage-earner devotes about 40 cents of every dollar earned to buying food. In India, that number is a staggering 70 cents out of every dollar earned. In other words, the food budget in these countries is hardly a discretionary item. It will remain constant, or even rise, no matter what the global economy does.

Meanwhile, the people in these countries who have a couple of extra rupees to toss around are upping their consumption of meats, which increases the per capita demand for grains. As PotashCorp chief William Doyle recently pointed out: “The average daily protein intake in China has increased by 40% over a 20-year period, with the greatest percentage of that increase coming from meat consumption.” You can see it in the size of the people themselves: The average 6-year-old Chinese boy is 12 pounds heavier and 2 inches taller than 30 years ago. These people aren’t going back to the ways thing were. This is a long-term story, and these trends should continue.

Yet even if demand growth for grains slows, it’s not likely that those low global grain inventories will improve. Even if grain demand fell to 2% per year, we’d still need record production to keep grain inventories from falling further.

For all these reasons, I think the future is still bright for agriculture and all that it entails. I think the fertilizer companies look cheap again. We owned Agrium (NYSE:AGU) for nearly three years, and it more than tripled our money. The stock is now a good one-third below what we bought it for initially.
PotashCorp (NYSE:POT) and Mosaic (NYSE:MOS) are other names I’m looking at hard right now – both have been crushed in this troubled market.

Beyond that, irrigation companies have come way down, even after posting outstanding results. Lindsay (NYSE:LNN) and Valmont (NYSE: VMI) are two irrigation equipment makers, for example, both coming off great quarterly results.

Source: Meal Ticket

Global wheat production will likely be 4.4% less next year, Dan Basse, president of AgResource Co. in Chicago, told Bloomberg News. Basse believes the world’s corn and soybean crops will also see declines.

“The credit situation is worrying even the biggest and best farmers,” Brian Willot, a former University of Missouri commodity analyst who now grows soybeans in Brazil, told Bloomberg. “For the financially weak, credit has dried up completely. For the strong, credit has been delayed and interest rates are higher.”

The risk-aversion of Wall Street is spreading out into other industries, as the main sources of lending for farmers – rural independent banks and crop processors such as Cargill Inc. and Archer Daniels Midland Co. (ADM) – tighten credit requirements by charging higher interest, demanding more collateral or in some cases, discontinue lending completely.

“We certainly could see tight credit having an effect on agricultural production,” U.S. Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer said earlier this month. “The costs of farming operations today are huge, and that backs up to the banks that have balance sheets that are tight, it backs up to elevators that have credit stretched out.”

Worse, drops in agriculture yields could be devastating to more than just the agriculture industry.

“Stockpiles are going to be extremely tight,” AgResource’s Basse told Bloomberg. “The world cannot afford any dislocation in production next year, or there will be a real shortage.”

The United Nation’s World Food Programme says the world is already gripped in a “silent tsunami” of hunger. And every drop in production pushes more of the world’s hungry towards the brink of starvation.

“It is estimated that more than 100 million people in the world have been forced into poverty and hunger because of the dramatic increase in food prices,” said Benjamin Senauer, a professor of applied economics at the University of Minnesota, author and researcher, MarketWatch reported. “Millions of American families’ food budgets have been stretched to the limit and beyond. Food stamp enrollment is up and food banks are seeing unprecedented demand.”

Smaller crops could mean higher prices at a time when consumers were just starting to see some slight signs of relief in the grocery store checkout line.

The change in food and beverage prices, as tracked by the U.S. Department of Labor, had moderated slightly in August and September after the record-highs of the summer. But even off the summertime highs, the overall Consumer Price Index increased 4.9% for the 12 months ended September 2008. In the food and beverage category, the increase was 6.0% year-over-year.

Agriculture futures for corn, wheat and soybeans are trading lower from earlier 2008 highs, but a steep decline in crop yields could cause future prices to reverse course.

Source: Tight Credit for Farmers Leads to Smaller Crops, Higher Prices and More Hunger