<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; CRXL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/crxl/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Takeover Targets: 3 Steps to Finding Them &amp; 3 Stocks for Any Portfolio</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/takeover-targets-3-steps-to-finding-them-3-stocks-for-any-portfolio/16346</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/takeover-targets-3-steps-to-finding-them-3-stocks-for-any-portfolio/16346#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Louis Basenese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRXL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GILD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investing in biotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Basenese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LWSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ORCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pfe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sgp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WYE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=16346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I promise. Alexander Green and I are not in cahoots about the coming boom in corporate takeovers… We both researched the possibility separately. Unprompted, I might add. And yet, armed with different evidence, we arrived at the same conclusion. If you ask me, such a convergence of analysis in a narrow space of time shouldn’t be ignored. So today, let’s move on from why a takeover boom is imminent and focus exclusively on three takeover targets you can profit from…</p>
<p><strong>Identifying The Market’s Next Takeover Targets </strong></p>
<p>The task of identifying the market’s next <a href="http://www.investmentu.com/research/index/profit-from-takeover-targets.html" target="_blank">takeover targets</a> can be daunting. Literally thousands of potential targets exist, which is probably why most investors liken it to a crapshoot and in turn, shun such a strategy&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I promise. Alexander Green and I are not in cahoots about the coming boom in corporate takeovers… We both researched the possibility separately. Unprompted, I might add. And yet, armed with different evidence, we arrived at the same conclusion. If you ask me, such a convergence of analysis in a narrow space of time shouldn’t be ignored. So today, let’s move on from why a takeover boom is imminent and focus exclusively on three takeover targets you can profit from…<span id="more-16346"></span></p>
<p><strong>Identifying The Market’s Next Takeover Targets </strong></p>
<p>The task of identifying the market’s next <a href="http://www.investmentu.com/research/index/profit-from-takeover-targets.html" target="_blank">takeover targets</a> can be daunting. Literally thousands of potential targets exist, which is probably why most investors liken it to a crapshoot and in turn, shun such a strategy altogether.</p>
<p>But that’s a monumental mistake!</p>
<p>They’re passing up easy double-digit profits. Historical takeover premiums (the amount paid over the current share price for a target company) average 22%, according to a study in <em>The Journal of Finance</em>.</p>
<p>And that’s just the averages.</p>
<p>It’s common for many deal premiums to reach into the high double digits and even triple digits.</p>
<p><strong>Investing in Takeover Targets &#8211; 3 Steps to Improving Your Odds</strong></p>
<p>By following three simple steps when investing in <a href="http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2008/January/takeover-trader.html" target="_blank">takeover targets</a>, we can dramatically improve our odds of success…</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Go where there is consolidation. </strong>Consolidation trends are a powerful predictive tool because they tend to persist. Think about it. When your biggest competitor goes out and doubles in size overnight, there’s only one way to respond &#8211; find a suitable acquisition of your own to remain competitive. Thus, by focusing on those industries and sectors undergoing the most rapid consolidation, we can isolate high probability targets.</li>
<li><strong>Focus on companies with valuable (and undervalued) assets. </strong>Whether it’s a new drug, a mammoth oil discovery, key market share, distribution channels, or a few promising patents, the real reason a company is acquired is because it owns a particular asset of value to the acquirer. Only invest in companies with such “must have” assets. And to reduce risk even further, I suggest buying clearly undervalued companies &#8211; ones trading at or near cash levels on the balance sheet. (Yes, they do exist.)</li>
<li><strong>Insist on improving fundamentals. </strong>Understand that takeovers take time. In fact, acquiring companies might spend as much as nine months conducting due diligence. Yet, even then, there’s nothing stopping them from walking away from a deal (Microsoft -NASDAQ:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AMSFT">MSFT</a>- and Yahoo! -NASDAQ:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=yhoo">YHOO</a>- ring a bell?). I recommend buying an “insurance policy” to protect against such unprofitable break-ups. By that I mean, only buy companies with improving fundamentals &#8211; whether it’s strong earnings growth, new product launches, increasing market share, etc. That way, you stand to profit even if a takeover never materializes.<strong></strong></li>
</ul>
<p>You’ll recall in my previous article about the imminent <a href="http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/April/takeover-boom.html" target="_blank">takeover boom</a>, I singled out three sectors that fit the first criteria above &#8211; health care (specifically drug makers), energy and technology.</p>
<p><strong>3 Takeover Targets to Add to Your Portfolio Today</strong></p>
<p>For those unwilling to expend the effort to carry out the next two steps… or just eager to get going immediately, here are three takeover targets to consider adding to your portfolio today:</p>
<ul type="square">
<li><strong>Crucell NV</strong> (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=CRXL" target="_blank">CRXL</a>): Merck (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:MRK">MRK</a>) and Schering Plough (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=Schering+Plough">SGP</a>). Pfizer (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=Pfizer">PFE</a>) and Wyeth( NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=Wyeth">WYE</a>). <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC%3ARHHBY">Roche</a> and Genentech (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=Genentech">DNA</a>). Now Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=Gilead+Sciences">GILD</a>) and CV Therapeutics. Crucell is likely next. It’s the largest independent vaccine maker, with products for treating influenza, childhood diseases and hepatitis B. Crucell’s PER.C6 cell line is its most valuable asset. The company already licenses out the technology to over 60 companies. And there’s no doubt management is accepting offers. In January, it was in friendly talks with Wyeth, before Pfizer swooped in and bought Wyeth and ended the discussions. Best of all, multiple suitors exist (Novartis -NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:NVS">NVS</a>-, Sanofi-Aventis (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:SNY">SNY</a>), Merck and eventually Pfizer) so a bidding war could unfold, which translates into greater profit potential for us.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="square">
<li><strong>Anadarko Petroleum, Corp</strong>. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=APC" target="_blank">APC</a>): As oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens famously observed, it’s often cheaper to drill for oil on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange than in the ground. Andarko proves it, as its reserves currently trade for less than $10 per barrel. Throw in a recent deep-sea discovery off Brazil, minimal political risk (80% of assets are located in North America) and high-quality, relatively untapped and undervalued natural gas assets and the takeover case here is an cinch. A multi-billion dollar stock repurchase program provides downside protection, too.</li>
</ul>
<ul type="square">
<li><strong>Lawson Software</strong> (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=LWSN" target="_blank">LWSN</a>): The company is a quickly growing niche vendor of enterprise resource planning (ERP) software for medium-sized businesses. Tech heavyweights like Oracle (NASDAQ:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=Oracle">ORCL</a>), Cisco (NASDAQ:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=Cisco">CSCO</a>)and Microsoft are in desperate need of new growth initiatives. They have little exposure to the middle-market. And they have the cash to afford to buy it. The $308 million in cash sitting on Lawson’s balance sheet reduces our risk and also represents a 32% instant rebate to any potential suitors.</li>
</ul>
<p>Full disclosure: I have recommended all three of these companies to subscribers in recent months. And we’re sitting on gains of 8%, 25% and 59%, respectively, proving it pays to follow step 3 above.</p>
<p>So to echo Alex’s sentiments from Monday, if you haven’t added a handful of potential <a href="http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/May/corporate-takeovers.html" target="_blank">corporate takeover</a> targets to your portfolio, what are you waiting for? The opportunities and potential profits will be historic.</p>
<p>Good investing,</p>
<p>Lou Basenese</p>
<p><a href="http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/May/takeover-targets.html"><br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2009/May/takeover-targets.html">Source:  Takeover Targets: 3 Steps to Finding Them &amp; 3 Stocks for Any Portfolio</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/takeover-targets-3-steps-to-finding-them-3-stocks-for-any-portfolio/16346/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Standard Flu Vaccines Won’t Make Investors Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/why-standard-flu-vaccines-won%e2%80%99t-make-investors-rich/16279</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/why-standard-flu-vaccines-won%e2%80%99t-make-investors-rich/16279#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 19:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCRX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBMX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRXL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DCGN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HEB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEDX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Cox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swine Flu Epidemic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VICL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=16279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A more recent addition to my transformational technologies portfolio, Medarex (NASDAQ:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=Medarex">MEDX</a>), has scored a huge win. The company, along with Massachusetts Biologic Laboratory, will get $60 million upfront from Merck (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:MRK">MRK</a>) for license rights to a monoclonal antibody that apparently cures <em>C. difficile</em> infection. They are eligible for another $165 million in milestones as well as royalties.</p>
<p>Think about the service this company has done mankind. <em>C. diff</em>, as hospital diarrhea is called, is a growing cause of hospital deaths. Though many cases outside of hospitals are never diagnosed, we know it kills at least 30,000 Americans annually. Those who do recover, about 9 out of ten, can suffer horribly for months. Bravo to Medarex and all those who made this breakthrough&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A more recent addition to my transformational technologies portfolio, Medarex (NASDAQ:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=Medarex">MEDX</a>), has scored a huge win. The company, along with Massachusetts Biologic Laboratory, will get $60 million upfront from Merck (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:MRK">MRK</a>) for license rights to a monoclonal antibody that apparently cures <em>C. difficile</em> infection. They are eligible for another $165 million in milestones as well as royalties.<span id="more-16279"></span></p>
<p>Think about the service this company has done mankind. <em>C. diff</em>, as hospital diarrhea is called, is a growing cause of hospital deaths. Though many cases outside of hospitals are never diagnosed, we know it kills at least 30,000 Americans annually. Those who do recover, about 9 out of ten, can suffer horribly for months. Bravo to Medarex and all those who made this breakthrough possible by investing your money in this incredibly worth effort.</p>
<p>So what does this have to do with swine flu?</p>
<p>So far, swine flu is a minor problem compared to <em>C. diff</em>. Only one person in the U.S. has died from the infection. Survival rates, in fact, are far higher than they are for <em>C. diff</em>. Still, it could get worse, and governments are looking for a vaccine. So, just what are the financial opportunities?</p>
<p>I see nothing significant in the short run. One can never account for mob psychology though, and there have already been surges in some vaccine companies. In terms of fundamentals, however, I don’t think standard flu vaccines are going to make investors rich. The reason is that governments are the real customers for flu vaccines. On top of that, vaccines are an established industry and yields tend to be driven down by competition.</p>
<p>Those who are interested in playing swings should probably look into:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Novavax  (<a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.google.com');" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=nvax" target="_blank">NASDAQ: NVAX</a>)</strong></li>
<li><strong>Dynavax (<a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.google.com');" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=dvax" target="_blank">NASDAQ: DVAX</a>)</strong></li>
<li><strong>Hemispherx Biopharma (<a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.google.com');" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=heb" target="_blank">AMEX: HEB</a>)</strong></li>
<li><strong>BioCryst Pharma (<a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.google.com');" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=bcrx" target="_blank">NASDAQ: BCRX</a>)</strong></li>
<li><strong>AVI BioPharma (<a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.google.com');" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=avii" target="_blank">NASDAQ: AVII</a>)</strong></li>
<li><strong>deCode Genetics (<a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.google.com');" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=dcgn" target="_blank">NASDAQ: DCGN</a>)</strong></li>
<li><strong>Crucell (<a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.google.com');" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=crxl" target="_blank">NASDAQ: CRXL</a>) </strong></li>
<li><strong>Vical (<a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.google.com');" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=vicl" target="_blank">NASDAQ: VICL</a>)</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>This does not mean there are not long-term flu-related opportunities. Even if swine flu doesn’t turn into a major pandemic, influenza is a serious international problem that drains resources and lives. The World Health Organization, estimates that influenza infects 5 to 15% of the world’s population in a typical year. This results in 250,000 to 500,000 deaths. The WHO and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are, of course, concerned about the potential for a major global pandemic. Medical science has progressed significantly since 1918, when the “Spanish Flu” killed upward of 50 million people; but it is still a serious illness.</p>
<p>Right now, the headlines generated by the flu are largely about trying to track and stop its progress. Today, this is extremely difficult. There are, however, solutions on the horizon.</p>
<p>I’ve written before about biochip sensors. These are a true transformational technology. Last year, agricultural losses of hundreds of millions of dollars were caused by the inability to quickly locate the source of a salmonella infection. What is needed, and will arrive in the not-so-distant future, are sensors that can detect disease pathogens cheaply and instantaneously. Think <em>Star Trek</em> tricorders…</p>
<p>And we’re getting close. <em>EETimes</em> is reporting that CombiMatrix Corp. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=CombiMatrix+Corp.">CBMX</a>) has made biochips that can be programmed to identify any known flu type. CombiMatrix says its microarray can be updated for new influenzas in less than a day and can deliver test results in only four hours.</p>
<p>A little bit further out are even bigger profit opportunities. Specifically, we’re looking at is an end to specific flu vaccines.</p>
<p>Pandemic influenzas emerge from a sudden change in the flu virus against which there is no immunity. Vaccines are the mainstay of flu prevention, but they have two key limitations. First, they are developed against single, known flu strains. Therefore, they may be ineffective against new strains. Second, vaccines are produced using a lengthy process requiring incubation in chicken eggs. New flu vaccines take months or years to stockpile.</p>
<p>There are general antiviral medications approved to treat influenza. Influenza virus strains, however, can become resistant to these medications. For this reason, scientists are looking to RNA interference for a brand new approach to preventing flu viruses.</p>
<p>I know of at least two companies that have been engaged in the search for an RNAi flu cure. The potential advantage of RNAi antiviral therapeutics is that RNAi can be used to provoke an immune response that prevents replication of all influenza viruses, new or old. Stockpiling of an effective RNAi treatment would be possible in advance of a global pandemic and could be used for routine flus as well. Moreover, whoever produces the therapy would have a significant profit potential.</p>
<p>For transformational profits,<br />
Patrick Cox</p>
<p><a href="http://pennysleuth.com/why-standard-flu-vaccines-wont-make-investors-rich/">Source: Why Standard Flu Vaccines Won’t Make Investors Rich </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/why-standard-flu-vaccines-won%e2%80%99t-make-investors-rich/16279/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Market’s Safest Sector Also Has Enormous Potential to Rise</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-market%e2%80%99s-safest-sector-also-has-enormous-potential-to-rise/13088</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-market%e2%80%99s-safest-sector-also-has-enormous-potential-to-rise/13088#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Fannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRXL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GILD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HGSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Genome Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pfe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Fannon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VRUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WYE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XBI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=13088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In  the past few years, a strange new “defensive” asset has appeared in  the market.</p>
<p>Investors use the “defensive” label to describe businesses that enjoy steady demand for their products &#8211; like food, cigarettes and electric utilities.</p>
<p>The thinking goes, you want to own these sectors when the economy stinks. Their sales and cash flows should hold up better than retailers and hotel chains when consumers are broke.</p>
<p>This from Rob Fannon, guest editor on Today&#8217;s <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links" onclick="return alinks_click(this);" title=""  style="padding-right: 13px; background: url(http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-content/plugins/alinks/images/external.png) center right no-repeat;" rel="external">Money Morning</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Considering we’ve just had the worst credit crisis in 80 years, and one of the worst-ever bear markets in stocks, the new “defensiveness” shown by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biotechnology" target="_blank">biotechnology</a> stocks is  extraordinary.</p>
<p>Biotech is typically a wild sector. Most people don’t think of it as place to find safe stocks. But&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In  the past few years, a strange new “defensive” asset has appeared in  the market.</p>
<p>Investors use the “defensive” label to describe businesses that enjoy steady demand for their products &#8211; like food, cigarettes and electric utilities.<span id="more-13088"></span></p>
<p>The thinking goes, you want to own these sectors when the economy stinks. Their sales and cash flows should hold up better than retailers and hotel chains when consumers are broke.</p>
<p>This from Rob Fannon, guest editor on Today&#8217;s <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links" onclick="return alinks_click(this);" title=""  style="padding-right: 13px; background: url(http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-content/plugins/alinks/images/external.png) center right no-repeat;" rel="external">Money Morning</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Considering we’ve just had the worst credit crisis in 80 years, and one of the worst-ever bear markets in stocks, the new “defensiveness” shown by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biotechnology" target="_blank">biotechnology</a> stocks is  extraordinary.</p>
<p>Biotech is typically a wild sector. Most people don’t think of it as place to find safe stocks. But have a look at the accompanying chart, which tracks the SPDR S&amp;P Biotech ETF (<a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/keyDevelopments?rpc=66&amp;symbol=XBI&amp;timestamp=20081107000000" target="_blank">XBI</a>) over the past two years. This fund has big holdings in the 10 or so large biotechnology companies that have viable products bringing cash in the door.</p>
<p>As the chart shows, the XBI ETF is actually higher today than it was back in 2007. You can’t say that about oil, real estate, retail stocks, food stocks, tech stocks, gold stocks, or financial stocks.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.moneymorning.com/images2/onthemove.gif" alt="" hspace="5" align="left" /></p>
<p>The strength in biotech shares is confirmation of something I’ve been predicting for the past few months: We’re due for huge rally in biotechnology stocks.</p>
<p>Biotech  companies are much different than giant pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer  Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=pfe" target="_blank">PFE</a>) or Merck &amp;  Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mrk" target="_blank">MRK</a>). Biotech firms make their drugs from living cells, rather than from mixtures of chemical compounds. Biotech drugs treat life-threatening diseases &#8211; so recessions barely dent sales growth. People can pass on the cholesterol-lowering effects of <a href="http://www.drugs.com/lipitor.html" target="_blank">Lipitor</a> for a while, but stopping  a cancer treatment can kill a patient in weeks to months.</p>
<p>And  because most biotech drugs are made from living cells, they’re hard to copy.  Right now, the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/" target="_blank">U.S. Food and Drug Administration</a> (FDA) has no approved pathway for <a href="http://www.kiplinger.com/businessresource/forecast/archive/congress_moving_on_generic_biotech_drugs_070710.html" target="_blank">generic  biotech drugs</a>. While Big Pharma is struggling with dwindling pipelines, big biotech companies are profitable, have growing sales, are generating tons of cash, and face no generic competition in the near term. Biotech bull markets are often good for gains of 300% to 500% &#8211; across the entire sector.</p>
<p>That’s  why I think you should become familiar with the sector immediately.</p>
<p>I recommend you start with three of the hottest areas of biotech. Each one has the potential to generate new “blockbuster” drugs (drugs with annual sales of more than $1 billion). Those three key areas are:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Metabolic disorders</span></strong><strong>: </strong>“<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metabolic_syndrome" target="_blank">Metabolic syndrome</a>” is a politically correct term for patients who are obese, diabetic, and face increased risk of heart disease. There are good drugs to control diabetes and help prevent heart disease, but no good drugs to treat obesity. With half of the U.S. population technically obese or overweight, an effective diet pill is the Holy Grail of drugs. Right now, Americans spend more than $50 billion per year on over-the-counter diet remedies. An FDA-approved fat pill would be a monster seller.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Vaccines</span></strong>: With new products to  prevent cervical cancer, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601080&amp;sid=a9Wn03ZEMFSo&amp;refer=asia" target="_blank">avian  flu</a>, and the common cold, <a href="http://health.usnews.com/articles/health/2009/02/05/health-buzz-universal-flu-vaccine-and-other-health-news.html" target="_blank">vaccines  are back in vogue</a>. Big Pharma player Wyeth (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=wye" target="_blank">WYE</a>) has one of the biggest  vaccines businesses in the drug world. It’s part of the reason the company <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/02/02/pfizer/" target="_blank">recently fetched a $68  billion buyout offer from Pfizer</a>. Dutch biopharma player Crucell NV (ADR: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=crxl" target="_blank">CRXL</a>) is the top remaining  independent vaccine players in biotech. I predict it’ll be acquired before 2009  is over.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Infectious diseases</span></strong>: The transformation of HIV from a death sentence to a chronic disease has turned the infectious-disease-drug market into a multibillion-dollar industry. Gilead Sciences Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=gild" target="_blank">GILD</a>) is  the top player in this space. The next frontier is an effective treatment for <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/HepatitisC.htm" target="_blank">Hepatitis C</a>. Current drugs have terrible side effects and only “cure” 50% of patients. A handful of biotech companies &#8211; Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=vrtx" target="_blank">VRTX</a>), Human Genome  Sciences Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=hgsi" target="_blank">HGSI</a>),  and Pharmasset Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=vrus" target="_blank">VRUS</a>)  &#8211; are nearing pivotal clinical data for next-generation Hepatitis C drugs.</li>
</ul>
<p>There’s never been a more exciting time to be a biotech investor. Big Pharma companies have nearly $100 billion in cash that will keep buyout offers large. We have plenty of “Holy Grail” areas to focus on. And, as you’ve seen, we have a strong trend on our side.</p>
<p>P.S. I expect the biggest opportunity in biotech (or the entire stock market for that matter) will arrive on March 30. By this day, one company will announce test results for a new drug that could create the single biggest return of any investment I’ve ever found. One drug expert calls the potential market for this drug the “biggest untapped goldmine in the industry” and speculates that it would be worth $10 billion per year. <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.stansberryresearch.com/pro/0902DILOUTSP/EDILK218/PR" target="_blank">Click here</a></span></strong> for the  full details of the situation.</p>
<p><a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/02/06/rob-fannon-phase-1/">Source: The Market’s Safest Sector Also Has Enormous Potential to Rise</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-market%e2%80%99s-safest-sector-also-has-enormous-potential-to-rise/13088/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Strange New Way to Invest</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/a-strange-new-way-to-invest/3100</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/a-strange-new-way-to-invest/3100#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 23:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Fannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oil Investment & Alternative Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celera Genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRXL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novozymes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SYT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://98.129.13.34/?p=3100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Biotech is no longer just a  drugs game.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">I&#8217;m at the annual Biotechnology Industry Organization (aka &#8220;BIO&#8221;) Conference here in San Diego. The buzzwords I keep hearing are <em>biofuels</em>,<em> green energy,</em> and <em>agribusiness</em>. This year&#8217;s tag line is <em>Innovate. Heal, Fuel, Feed the World. </em>And no shortage of businesses are claiming to do just that&#8230;</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">On Tuesday, keynote speaker Arnold Schwarzenegger highlighted several state energy programs that use biotechnology. And before the &#8220;governator&#8221; took the stage, genomics pioneer Dr. Craig Venter discussed his biofuels research&#8230; </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">As CEO of Celera Genomics, Venter headed efforts to sequence the human genome. Today, he&#8217;s launched his own private research institute focused on creating synthetic life forms&#8230; Essentially, he&#8217;s making creatures that eat carbon and excrete fuel. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Innovators like&#8230;</font></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Biotech is no longer just a  drugs game.</font><span id="more-3100"></span></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">I&#8217;m at the annual Biotechnology Industry Organization (aka &#8220;BIO&#8221;) Conference here in San Diego. The buzzwords I keep hearing are <em>biofuels</em>,<em> green energy,</em> and <em>agribusiness</em>. This year&#8217;s tag line is <em>Innovate. Heal, Fuel, Feed the World. </em>And no shortage of businesses are claiming to do just that&#8230;</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">On Tuesday, keynote speaker Arnold Schwarzenegger highlighted several state energy programs that use biotechnology. And before the &#8220;governator&#8221; took the stage, genomics pioneer Dr. Craig Venter discussed his biofuels research&#8230; </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">As CEO of Celera Genomics, Venter headed efforts to sequence the human genome. Today, he&#8217;s launched his own private research institute focused on creating synthetic life forms&#8230; Essentially, he&#8217;s making creatures that eat carbon and excrete fuel. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Innovators like Venter are about to make a boatload of money in ag-bio, biofuels, and other &#8220;green&#8221; life-science technologies. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">You see, when oil was $30 a barrel and corn still cost $2, biotechs didn&#8217;t have a reason to develop alternative energies or agricultural breakthroughs. Now, oil is over $130 and corn is $7.50 – and hitting new highs along with wheat, soybeans, and rice. The biotech industry wants a piece of the action&#8230;</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Large players like Monsanto (MON) and Syngenta (SYT) dominate the food side of the game. Both companies develop insect-resistant crops and genetically engineered seeds. Over the last year, Monsanto&#8217;s shares have doubled, up nearly 110%. Syngenta is up nearly 75%. Both are still in relentless uptrends.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- Advertisement &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
<strong>Use this Secret 9-Digit Code to Cash in 181% Gains</strong> </font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">925335AD3.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Give the above 9-digit Code to any regular broker, like TD Ameritrade, Fidelity, or Schwab&#8230;</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">And you are entitled, BY LAW, to receive as much as 181% in gains by June 15, 2009.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Just to be clear: This Code has nothing to do with the stock market. In fact, once you learn the full details, you may never want to buy stocks, EVER again.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"><a href="http://www.stansberryresearch.com/pro/0806TINDIGSP/ETINJ633/200806TIN-LEG-SP.html" target="_blank">Click here</a> for details.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>But today, the stocks are too  rich for my taste: Monsanto sells for 45 times earnings and Syngenta for 30.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">One company I like better is Denmark-based Novozymes. Novozymes works on food, energy, and&#8230; oh yeah&#8230; drugs. The company makes specialty enzymes. Its products are used in dishwashing detergents, food and alcohol production, oil and ethanol processing, livestock feed, and pharmaceuticals. Novozymes netted $1.5 billion in sales last year. And the $5 billion company is trading at reasonable levels today. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The one catch is that the stock trades on the OMX Nordic Exchange in Copenhagen. That makes it more difficult for U.S. investors to buy.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">The same is true of a couple of other interesting companies I found at  BIO&#8230; </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Take Danish company Danisco, for example. Danisco is one of Europe&#8217;s largest producers of sugar. Its technology also transforms raw materials into livestock feed, biofuel, and plastics. Last year, it brought in $4 billion in sales from customers in close to 50 different countries.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">And Euronext-traded DSM sells plastics, polymers, and chemicals used in human health and animal feed. And half of its $13 billion in sales last year came from industrial materials. The $10 billion company also has a manufacturing relationship with one of my favorite <em>Phase 1</em> picks, Dutch  biotech Crucell (CRXL).</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">I&#8217;m not suggesting you buy any of these stocks, not without putting in some solid research. But these companies are all cashing in on a trend I expect to track for some time. The agriculture and energy sectors are minting money right now&#8230; As the biotech industry is figuring out, there&#8217;s plenty to go around. </font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Good investing,</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Rob Fannon</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">P.S. Analyst George Huang and I are busy seeking out  the trend&#8217;s smallest and most innovative newcomers. <em><a href="https://www.isecureonline.com/secure/FORM1.CFM?PUBCODE=DIL&amp;PCODE=EDILJ600&amp;ALIAS=evergreenDIL" target="_blank">Phase 1</a></em> readers can  expect recommendations focused on  cleaner fuels, sustainable food production, and agricultural technologies.</font></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.growthstockwire.com/archive/2008/jun/2008_jun_20.asp">A Strange New Way to Invest</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/a-strange-new-way-to-invest/3100/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.356 seconds -->

