And so it begins. Just yesterday, we here at the TFN offices got into a late-day discussion about the fate of the nation’s natural gas markets.

With prices remaining low and entirely removed from the recent commodities bonanza, the nation’s expanding natural gas drilling industry is headed for trouble.

Today we got the news that proves our theory.

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP), the third largest of the nation’s Big Oil players, announced it is cutting its capital spending budget by nearly 10% and is selling some $10 billion worth of assets.

Why the drastic moves? Thanks in part to stubbornly low natural gas prices, the company needs to make the cuts to shore up a leveraged balance sheet.

If you recall, just last week the company warned Wall Street to expect reduced earnings figures thanks to a 67% reduction in natural gas prices.

There was similar news yesterday from nation’s second-largest producer, Chevron (NYSE:CVX). The California-based company quietly announced all drilling has stopped at its Piceance Basin facilities in Colorado.

I bet you can guess why they plugged the well. Yep, you betcha, low natural gas prices.

Drill, baby, drill

So if the natural gas price conundrum is having this effect on the nation’s largest companies and their multi-billion dollar cash flows, what is it doing to the tiny, marginal players?

Early last month, Trident Resources gave us a glimpse of what is likely to come. Citing liabilities of nearly a billion bucks and assets worth just $10 million, the Canadian gas driller was forced to walk into bankruptcy court and ask for protection from its creditors.

Indeed, the same companies investors were pumping their money into when gas was soaring to record highs are now failing under the weight of massive debt.

Here’s the kicker that is really going to tear the gas industry apart.

That massive debt that was picked up over the past few years doesn’t simply go away now that prices have plummeted. Drillers still have to pay their bills. That means any bit of cash flow available is direly needed.

That is how we got to where we are today, with natural gas inventories across the country at record high levels and growing by the minute.

With bills to pay, drillers simply refuse to close the valves on their producing wells. If they do, they’ll go bankrupt. But until they slow the flow, the price they get for that gas will sink lower and lower.

Eventually, prices will get so low the weak will be shaken out of the market whether they like it or not. They won’t be able to produce enough gas even to make their weekly payroll.

One of many

I could pick on dozens of small drillers that are facing gale-force headwinds, but since Rex Energy Corp. (NASDAQ:REXX) recently expanded its drilling in the Marcellus Shale formation, which is the chief cause of the current market glut, I will put their issues in the spotlight.

With $70 million in liabilities, the $330 million company is one of the better positioned drillers in its category. But much of that debt is focused on bringing the company to the Marcellus Shale region. If the move does not pay off, Rex could be forced to pay on a dud for quite some time.

Common estimates put the break-even price for Marcellus Shale drilling somewhere around $3.70 per 1,000 cubic feet of gas. Right now, drillers are able to get that price from the futures market, but the overfilled spot market is not willing to spend so much.

With nearly $1.50 difference between spot and future prices, something has got to give. With inventories about to overflow, the spot price won’t budge an inch.

The common argument throughout the market is that typical winter demand will reduce supplies and bring the markets back in equilibrium. But remember, the markets rarely go with the crowd.

The speculators have gas prices going higher over the next two months, but the facts and economic laws show prices will be going lower.

If it happens, it won’t be good for drillers. ConocoPhillips knows it. Now so do you.

Source: Natural Gas Industry Braces for Impact

Even a first grader can look at this market and know anything but fundamentals are driving the action. Fortunately for guys like me, few grade-school can figure out why.

These days, it is all about the macro-economy. More specifically, the only thing anybody cares about is the value of the dollar. When the greenback is up, the market is down (like today). When the dollar is weak, the market rallies – like last week.

There are several reasons for the trend: flight to safety, inflation, political risk… you name it.

What matters for us as traders is the pattern is unwaveringly true for the crude markets. With oil settlement denominated in dollars, the ever-important energy source is tied directly to the greenback.

The correlation makes oil a great hedge against the dollar, even better than the politically critical gold markets (few entities can dump billions of dollars of oil reserves into the market like the IMF may do).

Unfortunately, today’s strength in the dollar has sent crude prices back below the critical $70 level. As I write, a barrel is trading at $69.14, down $2.90 on the day.

That is not good news for industry giants like Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM), BP (NYSE:BP) and Chevron (NYSE:CVX), which all gapped down at the day’s opening bell.

Could be worse

While a small drop in Big Oil valuations erases billions in paper wealth, their shareholders are not feeling nearly the level of pain as the folks unlucky enough to be long on Delta Petroleum (NYSE:DPTR).

The stock is down 43% on news its Columbia River Basin test well performed far below expectations. While some gas was pumped, the company has deemed the level s “uneconomic.”

While the action has little to do with the value of the dollar or even commodity prices, the nasty decline goes a long way in showing the increasing levels of volatility in the nation’s energy industry.

As political, currency and economic risk swirl into a virtual perfect storm fueled by speculation, we are going to see larger and larger swings in the oil and natural gas industry. For some investors, it is exactly what they were hoping for. But for others, it will be a costly trap.

The folks with the most to win are options traders. Over at TFN Strategic Trader, we have used the increased volatility to our great advantage. Last Thursday, we locked in gains of 40% on a set of Chesapeake Energy call options.

Even better, the portfolio currently boasts a Big Oil short position and a dandy covered call already worth double-digit gains. Increased volatility will be a boon for options traders.

But for speculative investors looking to play the global economic rebound by grabbing shares of small-cap producers on the cheap, I have just three words… do your homework. If the dollar gets much weaker, the industry is going to start looking very different.

I am a huge fan of the commodities market, especially with China on a buying spree, but oil industry investors have a few more risk factors to handle.

Fail to understand how they all work together and you could have serious trouble on your hands. But get it right and make the smart moves, well, the rest of this year is going to treat you very well.

Keep your eye on that dollar.

Source: Oil Investors: Keep Your Eye on That Dollar

The first was an unprecedented $41 billion liquefied natural gas (LNG) deal with Australia, which was announced last week. The deal calls for PetroChina Co. Ltd. (NYSE: PTR) – Asia’s largest oil and gas company – to buy 2.25 million tons per year of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the Gorgon field in Western Australia over a period of 20 years.

It is the largest deal ever brokered between the two nations.

The Gorgon field has yet to be developed but is considered to be a key global resource and an economic boon for Australia.

“The Gorgon Project is globally and nationally significant with a resource base of more than 40 trillion cubic feet of gas and an estimated economic life of at least 40 years from the time of start-up,” said Chevron Australia Managing Director, Roy Krzywosinski.

“Furthermore, the Gorgon Project is Australia’s largest single resource project and is set to deliver significant economic benefits and create around 10,000 indirect and direct jobs during peak construction.”

Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX) owns and operates 50% of the field.

Yet this is just one of the mega-deals signed between China and Australia. China was Australia’s second largest merchandise trade partner in 2008 with two-way trade of $56.3 billion (A$67.74 billion). Australian exports to China grew 37% in 2008 from the previous year to $27 billion (A$32.48 billion) and comprised chiefly of raw and lightly processed farm, mineral and energy products.

“China needs us, we need China,” said Australian Trade Minister Simon Crean.

Of course, China’s demand for natural gas and other resources is growing so fast that it needs more than Australia.  That’s why the Red Dragon recently signed a $5.6 billion deal with a consortium of energy companies operating off the coast of Myanmar.

The consortium, led by South Korea’s Daewoo International Corp., will supply China National United Oil Corp. (CNUOC) with 500 million cubic feet of natural gas a year from 2013 to 2043. The supply, which will come from Myanmar’s A-1 and A-3 offshore blocks, amounts to about 7% of China’s current gas consumption, Reuters reported.

The consortium – which also includes India’s Oil and Natural Gas Corp., Myanmar Oil & Gas Enterprise, India’s GAIL Ltd., and Korea Gas Corp. – will invest a total of $5.6 billion in the project and be responsible for production and offshore pipeline transportation.

Land transportation will be jointly managed with CNUOC. The two parties also plan to build oil and gas pipelines through Myanmar and into China’s southwestern Yunnan province, Reuters reported.

Few Western countries, or Western companies do business with Myanmar, which has been heavily criticized for its human rights violations. The military junta that controls the country is considered one of the most repressive and brutal regimes in the world today. Forced labor, child labor, human trafficking, and instances of sexual abuse are widespread.

However, China, which has itself been a target among human rights watchdogs, chooses to overlook these discretions, preferring instead to focus on Myanmar’s resources. And in its defense, China is rightly concerned about securing enough raw materials to support its booming economy and a population of about 1.3 billion people.

Natural gas, for instance, accounts for just 3% of China’s total energy needs, but its use is expected to grow rapidly as energy demand increases. China currently consumes about 7.3 billion cubic feet per day, but that is expected to grow at a 10% compound annual rate to 18 billion cubic feet per day by 2020, according to Bernstein Research.

And China is doing the right thing by securing long-term supplies of natural gas now, while prices are low and supplies are high. It’s taken similar action with other commodities over the past year, stocking up on large amounts oil, copper, and iron ore as prices swooned.

China Gases Up While Prices Are Low

Natural gas prices yesterday (Thursday) fell to levels not seen since 2002 after the U.S. Energy Department said the amount of gas in storage hit a record high for this time of year.

Natural gas stockpiles rose by 52 billion cubic feet to about 3.2 trillion cubic feet in the week ended Aug. 21 –21% above year ago levels. Levels are now so high that some experts believe the United States will run out of storage capacity before winter begins.

“We have never been here before in terms of what to expect when storage gets this high,” Aubrey K. McClendon, Chief Executive Officer of Chesapeake Energy Corp. (NYSE: CHK), told the New York Times. “It’s like a balloon; there comes a point where you can’t blow any more air into it.”

Natural gas prices tumbled more than 6% to $2.725 per 1,000 cubic feet of gas on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), a price not seen since Aug. 7 2002, The Associated Press reported.

However, now that gas prices have tumbled roughly 80% from last year’s high above $13, some investors believe the market is bottoming out – or at the very least, significantly below its fair value.

Chesapeake Energy stock has risen nearly 8% in the past month, despite plunging prices and mounting inventories. Devon Energy Corp. (NYSE: DVN) is up about a 5.5%.

“The perception is that gas has finally gotten to its lowest point, so people are buying exploration and production stocks,” Marshall Adkins, energy analyst at Raymond James Financial Inc. (NYSE: RJF), told Reuters.

However, Adkins does not expect a rebound to come any time soon. His firm expects natural gas prices to fall below $2.50 per thousand cubic feet in the months ahead as an inventory overhang overshadows gas’ attractive price.

Still, there’s good reason to believe gas prices will have a strong rally in early 2010. To begin with, gas companies are slashing production exploration in dramatic fashion.

Newfield Exploration Company, for instance, has announced the plans to voluntarily curtail about 2.5 billion of cubic feet equivalent of gas of its third quarter of 2009 production in response to the recent lull in prices.

U.S. producers have cut the number of rigs drilling for new gas by more than half since Sept. 2008. Oil-services company Baker Hughes Inc. (NYSE: BHI) recently reported that 688 gas rigs were active in the United States, down about 56% from one year ago.

“We think the decline curve for production will be fairly steep because of the big drop in drilling,” Rich Howard, manager of the Prospector Capital Appreciation fund, told CNNMoney.

Source: China Landing Natural Gas Deals as Prices Plummet

If you’re looking for the next “Big Oil” play, bet on Beijing.  As we’ve been reporting for the past several years, China has been on a global commodities shopping spree, which includes locking up every source of oil that it can.

The Red Dragon has cut deals in Africa, South America Russia and the Middle East – and won’t stop there. Even the mainstream news media is finally becoming aware of this crucial trend.

But here’s the thing. It’s not enough just to know that this is happening. In order to profit, an investor really needs to understand why it’s happening – and to invest accordingly. Investors who lack this insight may make the strategic misstep of betting heavily (or exclusively) on the Western heavyweights – Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE: XOM), BP PLC (NYSE ADR: BP) or Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE ADR: RDS.A, RDS.B) – while ignoring the oil sector’s real growth story, which is China.

Just this year alone:

• China and Russia have signed a multi-billion-dollar, intergovernmental agreement to construct an oil line from Russia that will supply oil directly to China. Actually seven agreements in one, the terms depict a deal worth trillions of dollars – including a 20-year oil contract to pump Russian oil to the Chinese market. In return, China has agreed to provide a total of $25 billion in loansto Russian oil companies Transneft and OAO Rosneft Oil Co. China even gets a cut of Rosneft’s production, as part of the deal.
• In Africa, China’s CNOOC Ltd. (NYSE ADR: CEO) and Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co. (NYSE ADR: SHI) are teaming up to buy a $1.3 billion stake in Angolan offshore development rights from U.S.-based Marathon Oil Corp. (NYSE: MRO). A key point of note: Angola – historically one of Exxon’s favorite investment targets – has recently overtaken Nigeria as Africa’s biggest oil producer.
• While noting that it’s hardly a done deal, The Wall Street Journaldid report earlier this month that China National Petroleum Corp. (CNPC) is interested in buying all or a part of Argentina’s YPF SA (NYSE ADR: YPF) for $14.5 billion.
• In Africa, China’s CNOOC Ltd. (NYSE ADR: CEO) and Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co. (NYSE ADR: SHI) are teaming up to buy a $1.3 billion stake in Angolan offshore development rights from U.S.-based Marathon Oil Corp. (NYSE: MRO). A key point of note: Angola – historically one of Exxon’s favorite investment targets – has recently overtaken Nigeria as Africa’s biggest oil producer.
• Reports continue to circulate that CNPC will be taking the majority stake in Iraq’s Rumaila oilfield from BP. Rumaila is Iraq’s biggest oil field, producing more than a million barrels of crude oil per day.
• And China has become quite chummy with Brazil’s Petroleo Brasileiro (NYSE ADR: PBR). Petrobras is developing a huge new offshore field – one of the biggest new discoveries in decades, in fact – and any deal would include a production-supply agreement.

This flurry of deals hasn’t been a surprise to Money Morning readers. Even so, it’s worth taking a moment to look at some of the key catalysts behind many of these deals. Let’s look at the Top Three:

• Nervous Reserves: China is sitting on the world’s largest pile of cash – more than $2.3 trillion by some estimates. With an estimated 70% of that, or about $1.61 trillion, in U.S. dollars, there is no question it’s a huge source of financial firepower strength at a time when global markets are uncertain, if not downright weak. But it’s also a liability, too, in that China can’t diminish its high-concentration of greenback holdings without pushing the dollar off a cliff. So buying oil is a great way for China to diversify its reserves without kneecapping poor old Uncle Sam.
• Those Not-So-Free “Free” Markets: China has less faith in the “free” markets than the West does. Ironically, the United States and other Western powers are partly to blame for Beijing’s free-market skepticism. For instance, not only did the United Statesslam the door in China’s face when China tried to buy Unocal Corp. [now a part of Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX)]  a few years back, but when former U.S. President George W. Bush invaded Iraq, the war summarily cut off China’s ability to source oil from that Middle East member of the OPEC 12 (the Organization of the Oil Producing and Exporting Countries). Prior to the invasion, Beijing really didn’t consider the need to diversify China’s foreign-oil sources so our military action prompted their economic reaction. Now the genie’s out of the bottle.
• Peerless Perspective: China’s leaders know that they must lock up oil supplies at a time when the Western world can’t seemingly be bothered to understand that this is a zero-sum game. In other words, China views the global financial crisis as an opportunity to be exploited for economic gain and the security of its people, not as a problem to be solved. China understands the big picture, and even though we apparently painted it, the West doesn’t.  By scouring the earth for oil at a time when the West is hamstrung by the global financial crisis, not only is China able to strike more favorable deals at more favorable prices, but it’s locking up huge supplies of commodities for its own use for years, even decades, to come. In doing so – and this is the part of the equation so many experts don’t get – these resources are no longer available for our use here in the United States, which has major supply and pricing implications for this market.

Bamboozled by the Western media – which has perpetuated the “global-recession-means-lower-demand” story – it simply hasn’t dawned on most people here in the West that China doesn’t care about the majorlong-term impact this global buying spree will have on our economy.
Besides, this whole story thesis is flat out wrong. While the recession is definitely dampening our use of oil and gasoline, China’s oil demand is growing by more than 20% a year. And of the 8 million barrels a day that China already uses, half comes from imports. Beijing sees those as troubling statistics, which means that China:

• Absolutely must lock up as many significant external supplies oil as possible right now.
• And must accelerate its domestic exploration-and-processing efforts at warp speed.

Nor is this a static situation. China’s auto market is growing by 50% a year. It’s already the world’s largest, having passed the United States earlier this year. In fact, according to some estimates, China will have more cars on its roads in the next 20 years than all those we currently have in this country – even if you include the engine-less “restoration project” your next-door neighbor’s son has sitting under an oak tree in their back yard.

China’s never known high prices and its consumers haven’t either. So they don’t care like we do about what “price” is posted at the pump. Sure, you can argue as many Western analysts do, that China’s fuel is highly subsidized, but so what? That’s a moot point. Consumers who remember what it was like back when gasoline was 99 cents a gallon aren’t going to grouse about how it now costs $6 a gallon – these newly minted motorists will merely see gasoline as just part of the cost of having a car.

Because it understands its need for continual economic progress – as well as the role oil has to play to make that a reality – China is doing whatever it takes to guarantee future supplies, including structuring deals in ways that have caught Western companies by surprise. For instance, China’s companies are looking at how they can get a deal done by giving the other party something it actually needs. Moreover, in a move that’s as frustrating to Western leaders as it is surprising, many of these deals come with no strings attached. I suppose you could call it the “Red Dragon Option” – although Western firms would do well to embrace these as potential Harvard Business Review case studies.

After reading this overview, a U.S investor might want to conclude that China’s already got this one wrapped up and that “any resistance is futile.” But that’s not necessarily true. While China’s grown by leaps and bounds in terms of its financial sophistication when it comes to these deals, the country still lacks the relative exploration-and-production technology to go after the deep-water reserves and complicated fields where most of the still-undiscovered oil remains. Those are also the same kinds of locations where natural gas may be the better bet.

And that suggests that investments in both sectors – including deep-water drillers and companies that specialize in natural-gas liquification -may pay off for investors anxious to dine with the Red Dragon, instead of being listed as an entrée on the menu.

Source: Three Reasons China is Positioned to be the Oil Sector’s Next Big Profit Play

[Editor's Note: The global economic recovery will create an estimated $300 trillion worth of global-investing-profit opportunities. To find out how to capitalize and profit, you just need to know where to look.

]]> http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/three-reasons-china-is-positioned-to-be-the-oil-sector%e2%80%99s-next-big-profit-play/19976/feed 0 http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/a-hot-stock-in-a-cool-market/19819 http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/a-hot-stock-in-a-cool-market/19819#comments Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:30:39 +0000 Andrew Snyder http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19819 It is hard to find a “true” growth story these days, especially in the United States. In China, however, things are not quite as bleak. The action from SmartHeat (NASDAQ:HEAT) is a perfect example.

Call it an earnings season hangover. Call it profit taking. Or call it a technical reverse. Just don’t call it a good day on Wall Street.

With the equities market down by over 1% at the moment, investors who got in at the recent highs are wondering what in the world they may have gotten themselves into. A slew of the markets most-popular investments of late are taking it square on the chin.

General Electric (NYSE:GE) is down by over 3%. Harley Davidson (NYSE:HOG) is down by nearly 3.5%.…

The number was so big and the results beat Wall Street estimates by so much at a time when the credit crisis was wreaking havoc on so many other sectors that Oppenheimer & Sons (NYSE: OPY) oil analyst Fadel Gheit couldn’t help but quip that he didn’t think Exxon “will be lining up for any TARP money or government handout anytime soon.”

Exxon wasn’t the only heavyweight reaping the benefit of a zooming energy market that had seen crude oil climb to an all-time record of $147 a barrel in July. The combined revenue for Exxon and Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX) for all of last year actually exceeded the gross domestic product (GDP) of all but 16 of the world’s nations, Bloomberg News reported.

What a difference a few months can make.

If the name of the game is corporate profits, the global economic slowdown has transformed some of the world’s biggest oil companies from leaders to laggards.

Global-energy heavyweights Exxon and Royal Dutch Shell PLC (NYSE ADR: RDS.A, RDS.B) yesterday (Thursday) became the latest players to feel the one-two punch of dwindling demand and rising supplies, reporting profit drops of 66% and 67%, respectively.

Exxon’s net income fell to $3.95 billion, or 81 cents a share, compared to $11.68 billion, or $2.22 a share, in the same quarter a year ago. The results were well below Wall Street estimates for earnings of $1.02 a share. Shell’s bottom line fell to $3.82 billion, or 62 cents a share for the second quarter, compared to $1.87 per share in the same period last year.

“Global economic conditions continue to impact the energy industry both in the volatility of commodity prices and reduced demand for products,” said Exxon Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Rex Tillerson.

With consumers and companies alike slashing costs in any way possible in an environment of spiraling unemployment and the looming possibility of inflation as a result of government stimulus efforts around the world, Exxon, Shell and other Big Oil companies are feeling the squeeze and are cutting back in almost every way possible.

“Our second quarter results were affected by the weak global economy,” Shell CEO Peter Voser when the results were released. “This weakness is creating a difficult environment both in upstream and downstream” oil production.

Shell, for instance, said it’s embarked on a cost-cutting program that will pare billions of dollars in operating expenses. In one bright spot, however, The Netherlands-based oil giant did say that it had increased its second-quarter dividend 5% to 42 cents a share, and Chief Financial Officer Simon Henry said Shell will be able to keep raising the dividend to keep pace with inflation.

Exxon’s shares fell about 1% yesterday to close at $70.72 each. They’re down about 14% from their 12-month high of $84.76. Royal Dutch Shell’s “A” shares edged up 0.13% to close at $52.53; they’re down 29% from their 52-week high of $73.97.

“There’s a lack of follow-through on production” at Exxon, Macquarie Research analyst Jason Gammel told Barron’s in an interview. “The Street rewards companies that grow production, not those who are flat.”

Exxon’s combined oil and gas production dropped 3% in the quarter, and the company blamed the year-over-year decline on restrictions imposed by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). Shell’s production suffered more, falling 5.3%, placing part of the blame on a politically unstable Nigeria.

The heft that gave Big Oil companies the huge advantage of global scale last year is now working against them; with their large size, and against the backdrop of a global economic downturn, finding new revenue to bump up profits – and, ultimately, their share prices – will be a major challenge, analysts say.

“I think it’s generally going to be difficult for the Big Oils to move the needle,” Howard Weil analyst Doug Leggate told Bloomberg News. “Those companies that can move the needle in terms of adding value through exploration or other methods of improving their portfolios, they’re the ones who are going to win out.”

Profit at Exxon’s production and exploration unit fell to $3.81 billion in the second quarter, down $6.2 billion compared with a year earlier. In its refining business, its profit fell to $512 million, down $1.05 billion from a year ago. Profit in the same category at Shell dropped 77%, to $1.33 billion, from $5.9 billion a year ago, mostly on lower oil prices.

The grim oil earnings news yesterday followed Wednesday’s report from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) that U.S. crude stocks rose by 5.1 million barrels to 347.8 million barrels for the week ended July 24. Estimates by market research firm Platts were calling for a gain of just 1.1 million barrels, MarketWatch.com reported.

U.S. crude stocks are 29.8 million barrels above the five-year average and 52.6 million barrels above year-ago levels, according to Platts.

“The data has been bearish for most of the year, and the market may be ready to acknowledge that we are awash in crude oil and products, and demand is lower than last year despite the fact that oil and product prices are much lower,” WTRG Economics analyst James L. Williams told MarketWatch. “We will be well into the recovery from the recession before there is any appreciable increase in demand.”

As of yesterday afternoon, crude oil for September delivery was trading at $66.80, up $3.45 a barrel. But that’s down $55 a barrel from this time last year – a 45.16% decrease.

Those hoping for a rally may find that they’ve only engaged in a bit of wishful thinking, since a number of analysts say there aren’t any catalysts for higher prices in sight.

Take James Cordier, president of Liberty Trading Group, who says that the rally to prices in excess of $70 earlier this year was “well overpriced.” He expects prices to continue to fall in the weeks and months to come, Cordier said in an interview with Yahoo Inc.’s (Nasdaq: YHOO) Tech Ticker.

Cordier points to the speculative demand driven by government stimulus packages, notably the liquid commodities in China, a nation whose economy looks “a little bit like a bubble to us.”

Cordier’s firm, which trades commodity-based options, is “selling calls with both hands.”

If there’s an upside to any of this, Cordier says it will be lower gas prices, which he expects to fall 15-to-20 cents per gallon around August or September, a welcome relief for consumers.

The low demand and rising supply of oil is catching the eye of regulators worldwide, who are applying the heat to speculators who are believed to be behind the main force behind wild swings in the futures markets over the past two years.

Here in the United States, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) this week held the second of three hearings on energy trading. In the United Kingdom, the Financial Services Authority (FSA) will hold a special meeting on Aug. 5 with oil companies, banks, hedge funds and oil brokers to review regulation in the market.

“A lot of what we’ve seen in recent years has nothing to do with the underlying fundamentals of the market,” Tom Bentz, a senior energy analyst at BNP Paribas Commodity Futures Inc. (OTC ADR: BNPQY), told Bloomberg. “Something has to be done to reduce some of the speculation, no doubt about it.”

Indeed, the supply-and-demand fundamentals taught in high school and college have actually come under fire just because of how speculators have allegedly distorted the oil-price market in recent years.

This year’s volatility in the market defy the “accepted rules of economics,” French President Nicolas Sarkozy and U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown said in an opinion column published earlier this month in The Wall Street Journal.

“The surge in prices last year gravely damaged the global economy and contributed to the downturn,” the two statesmen said. “The risk now is that a new period of instability could undermine confidence just as we are pushing for recovery. Governments can no longer stand idle. Volatility damages both consumers and producers.”

Big Oil executives said it is doubtful the looming U.K.-based meeting would result in any substantial new initiatives, but added that it would discuss “whether the current arrangements [in the oil market] remain appropriate,” The Financial Times reported. “The question of position limits does not seem to have the same level of priority (in Europe) as it does in the United States,” Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB) Chief Energy Economist Adam Sieminski told the FT.

Source: Global Slowdown and Plunging Profits Have ‘Big Oil’ Companies Searching for Ways to Rebound

Stock investors will key next on earnings from tech giant Intel Corp.(Nasdaq: INTC) and banks including J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) for hints of what to expect in the third quarter — and how badly the recession hurt businesses in the second quarter.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and Dow Jones Industrial Average delayed declined for the fourth straight week last week – the longest string of losses since stocks hit their low point in March – and investors are looking at the tech sector to squelch the ongoing decline. The Nasdaq Composite Index complost 2.47% in the week ended Friday.

Earnings reports this week from computer-chip giant Intel and several big banks – including JPMorgan Chase & Co. - could provide investors and economists some insights on where the U.S. economy appears to be headed. Earnings are expected to improve over the last quarter, even though they’ll still be down substantially on a year-over-year basis, Binky Chadha, chief U.S. equity strategist at Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB), told MarketWatch.com,

“A necessary condition for the markets to go up from here is that earnings have to deliver, and we need a dissipation of the uncertainty about earnings,” Chadha said.

Year-over-year (annual) earnings comparisons are typically the financial yardstick that analysts use to assess whether the U.S. economy is growing or declining, meaning that “sequential” (quarter-to-quarter) earnings aren’t as crucial. This time around, however, the quarterly numbers may be viewed as important because they might give a better picture of the economy’s health.

During periods of extreme uncertainty, earnings estimates for companies tend to be widely dispersed – a function of investors not really knowing what to expect. That’s particularly true right now of banks and financial-services companies – and companies that derive most of their income from discretionary consumer spending.

And that makes sense, given that those are the two most uncertain portions of the U.S. economy – thanks to the ongoing global financial crisis and a jobless recovery that is badly crimping consumer confidence.

After mounting one of the strongest surges in history from their March lows, U.S. stocks have fallen back in recent weeks as investors dealt with a growing realization that the U.S. economy – and its counterparts abroad – won’t rebound with the speed or strength that had been widely expected. Further evidence of this came on July 2, when a U.S. payrolls report said the economy had lost more jobs than had been expected.

Against that backdrop, analysts and other investors are looking to the U.S. high-tech sector to pull the economy out its doldrums, Money Morning recently reported as part of its mid-year forecast series.

Thomson Reuters predicted that S&P 500 earnings will decline by 36% from last year’s levels, with financials (-53%) leading the way and techs (-24%) performing better than other sectors.  This should represent the eighth-straight quarterly decline, though analysts seem more concerned about the ensuing management comments on future operations, since that will shed some light on where the economy is headed.

When Intel reports tomorrow (Tuesday) analysts expect to see that /quotes/comstock/15*!intc/quotes/nls/intcsecond-quarter sales and earnings plunged, but some analysts believe demand may be returning to the battered market following a sharp slowdown in demand for high-tech goods. Internet-search juggernaut Google Inc. (Nasdaq: GOOG) will report on Thursday.

Other firms that report this week include Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS), Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC) and Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C). JPMorgan reports Wednesday.

“The market is filled with folks who want to be optimistic, but simply cannot find enough genuine reasons to buy into the market,” Mike Gambale, an analyst at Informa Global Markets, told journalists. “We don’t expect impressive numbers across the board, but there will be some surprises, as there always are.”

[If you're new to the commodities-investing arena, and are uncertain about the landscape - or even if you're an "old hand" at natural-resource stocks, but want some insights into the new profit plays and new players - consider hiring a guide: Money Morning Contributing Editor Peter Krauth, a recognized expert in metals, mining and energy stocks, is also the editor of the Global Resource Alert trading service, which ferrets out companies poised to profit from the so-called "Secular Bull Market" in commodities. A former portfolio advisor, Krauth continues to work out of resource-rich Canada, which keeps him close to most of the companies he researches. Against the growing global financial malaise, Krauth says that commodities are among the most-profitable and least-risky investments available, and notes that this may well be the most powerful bull market for commodities we'll see in our lifetime. He makes a strong case. To read more about his strategies, and the sector plays he likes the most, Please click here. ] 

Market Matters

“New and improved” was the market mantra of the week. General Motors Corp. (OTC: GMGMQ) emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection after just over a month, eager to start anew as a “new and improved” automaker.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) set its sights on “new and improved” trading regulations to limit excessive speculation within the energy and other commodities markets.  Some politicos are calling for a “new and improved” stimulus package to move the economy beyond the worst recession since the Great Depression.  A “new and improved” Public-Private Investment Program (PPIP) was scaled back dramatically as selected managers will begin purchasing toxic assets from ailing banks.  Unfortunately, as the week progressed, investors did not seem too keen on these “new and improved” developments.

Despite harsh protests by consumer groups and creditors, new GM reopened for business, “leaner and meaner” than ever.  A judge’s ruling allowed the once-bankrupt company to sell its performing assets to a new government-controlled entity (thanks to a $50 billion “investment” by taxpayers).

The government then shifted its attention to the regulatory world and announced plans to propose trading restrictions on certain commodities and increase the oversight over risky derivative products that have proven so detrimental to the financial markets.

The widely anticipated earnings season got started as Alcoa Inc. (NYSE: AA) reported another quarterly loss (with better-than-expected numbers) and oil giant Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX) warned that its results would be hindered by poor refinery operations and a weak dollar.

Investors have taken a more cautious approach heading into the new (but not improved) earnings season, particularly after last week’s pessimistic labor data.

Stocks fell throughout the week and fixed income again became beneficiary of safe-haven trades.  The tech-heavy Nasdaq now remains the only major domestic stock index “in the black” for the year.

Fickle energy traders suddenly turned bearish, as well, as the weak economic data implied that oil demand would be curtailed for the foreseeable future (or, at least, until 2013 according to Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries’ “2009 World Oil Outlook”).  Crude oil plunged beneath $59, or more than 10% during the week, on ongoing economic concerns,  although consumers ultimately may be recipients of cheaper gas prices.

Economically Speaking

Talk of a second stimulus surfaced this week, with several leaders – including U.S. Vice President Joe Biden and investing icon Warren Buffett – stating that the Obama administration’s $787 billion stimulus isn’t enough to jumpstart the U.S. economy.

On the other hand, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., believes the plan needs more time to work through the system as only 10% or so has even been distributed thus far.  Economists seem to agree with “Hank,” as the latest Wall Street Journal survey reported that over 80% of respondents feel that the country does not need a new round of stimulus in the current environment.  Still, the “Oracle of Omaha” painted an optimistic picture of the future by stating that the United States is “going  to come out of this better than ever, the best days of America lie ahead but not next week or next month.”

On the global front, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) revised – upward – its forecast of economic growth for 2010 and confirmed its belief that the developing economies in China and India will greatly contribute to the global rebound.

The May trade balance highlighted a slow week of data as the deficit declined to its lowest level since late 1999 and the weak labor market helped reduce consumer demand for foreign goods.

While initial claims for unemployment benefits fell to levels not seen since the beginning of the year, continuous claims (those folks who remain on the unemployment rolls for over a week) rose by another record amount.

In other words, no matter how one dissects the numbers, the labor picture looks dire and may not begin to improve for some time.  As such, the latest University of Michigan consumer sentiment reading dropped for the first time since February, another sign that the optimism of the past few months may be fading fast.

Weekly Economic Calendar

Source: Investors Looking to Tech to Pull U.S. Stocks – and the Economy – Out of Their Doldrums

It doesn’t matter whether you believe in “Peak Oil” because this isn’t about Peak Oil coming to fruition. Peak Oil believes that oil discoveries have peaked leading to oil production’s inevitable decline.

This crisis will be strictly man-made. Governments and oil companies have already planted the seeds of the next great energy crisis. And there’s nothing anybody can do to prevent those seeds from sprouting.

The U.S. government got its religion late. But it’s now following the lead of European governments in limiting the use of fossil fuels through taxes and restrictive regulations.

That’s bad enough in itself. But then there’s the roller-coaster ride which oil prices have taken. The price of oil fell more than $100 from over $140 to under $40 (before going back up again).  Oil companies everywhere had the same response. They all cut back on oil spending and production…

•    OPEC has cut back production by 2.2 billion barrels a day.
•    UAE has put off plans to expand oil production by 1 million barrels a day.
•    Saudi Arabia has delayed two $10-$20 billion refining projects (and may cancel them altogether).
•    Russia’s biggest oil company, Gazprom, has slashed production spending by 24 percent.
•    Venezuela, Nigeria, Malaysia and other national oil companies have cut back on their capital spending.
•    Statoil, EnCana, Petro-Canada, Suncor, Imperial Oil, and Royal Dutch Shell have all delayed or cancelled major        projects in Canada’s vast but expensive-to-produce oil sands.

How bad are these cutbacks? Just ask the widely respected oil consulting agency, the International Energy Agency. It recently warned of a “second capacity crunch” causing widespread underinvestment in the oil industry.

Oil’s recent price rise could have loosened up oil producers’ purse strings. But oil companies are facing increasing disincentives from a government trying to replace fossil fuels with renewables.

If you want to know how the CEOs of Big Oil feel about the Obama administration’s energy policy, just ask Jim Mulva, head of ConocoPhillips.
This global oil company has operations in more than 30 countries. Mulva said last week that government intervention in the energy market “has an impact on the willingness of companies to pour billions into the development of new projects.”

In the meantime, the Obama administration is spending hundreds of millions of dollars on renewables, like the $467 million to encourage the development of geothermal and solar energy.|

The result? Geothermal and solar energy will have slightly bigger pieces of the energy pie. But oil priced at over $150 per barrel will kill the U.S. and global economic recovery in its infancy.

The cost of plastics and resins will go way up. Gas prices will surge over $5/ gallon. New highs in jet fuel will crash several airline companies. Actually, practically everything will cost more. I don’t think that’s what these governments have in mind.

And even with ample government support you shouldn’t invest in geothermal or solar companies. They will still depend on government subsidies to compete with the price of electricity generated by – take a guess – fossil fuels.

Instead you should invest in oil producers but not just any oil producer. Thanks to vast underinvestment and government policies, the price of oil will sky rocket. The only thing keeping the price of oil from going higher right now is that we’re still in the middle of the worst recession in seven decades.

But once demand returns, watch out.

Total’s CEO Christophe de Margerie says that a rise in demand while supply is constrained will unleash oil prices again.
And Mitsubishi warns that spare capacity will quickly disappear when oil demand picks back up.

But, as I said, most oil companies have cut back production and spending. That’s going to prevent them from getting windfall profits from soaring oil prices.

But four of the world’s major oil companies haven’t cut back on spending. Three of them are Exxon Mobil, Chevron and Thailand’s PTT Exploration & Production. But by far the best oil investment you could make is in a fourth big oil company.

Last year it spent 34 percent more on drilling for oil. And this year it’s spending 19 percent more. While the other oil majors are cutting back on spending and facing stagnant output, this company plans on raising production by 7-11 percent a year. I’m predicting its shares will go up at least 80 percent over the next three years, and the gains could be much bigger than that.

I’m sorry but I can’t give you the name of the company because it’s my latest recommendation to readers of my INCOME service. They deserve first crack at this company, especially since its price is so cheap at the moment. But if you’re interested in this company, just click here for more information, including how to sign up in order to get this company as your first recommendation.

Source: The Coming Global Blackout

]]> http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-coming-global-blackout/18794/feed 0 http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/wall-st-falls-on-economic-worries/18152 http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/wall-st-falls-on-economic-worries/18152#comments Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:00:39 +0000 Contrarian Profits http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18152 U.S. stocks slid on Monday as investors questioned the strength of an economic recovery, while energy shares were dragged down by lower oil prices. After a sharp three-month rally, indexes have eased as traders increasingly questioned if stocks are due for a correction.

Worries that the economic recovery could be tepid have wilted the optimism that drove the S&P 500 up by as much as 40 percent from the 12-year low in March.

Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM) and Chevron Corp (CVX) were the biggest drags on the Dow as the price of oil fell below $68 a barrel on the stronger dollar. Exxon was down 2 percent to $69.61, while Chevron fell 2.5 percent to $66.34.

While higher oil prices can be a boon for energy companies,…

• A stronger dollar and falling oil prices helped U.S. stocks to suffer a sharp drop yesterday (Monday), as investors continue to find it difficult to see real signs of an economic rebound, Reutersreported. All three major U.S. indices – including the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the Standard& Poor’s 500 Index, dropped more than 2%. Hardest hit were the shares of energy companies such as Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX), which closed down more than 2% at $71.08. The dollar gained against all 16 of its major counterparts currencies, except for the Japanese yen, after Russian Finance Minister Alexi Kudrin said it was too early to consider an alternative to the greenback following a Group of Eight meeting. Of note, the euro fell versus the dollar following the European Central Bank said commercial banks in the 16-country euro region may lose an additional $283 billion by the end of 2010, Bloomberg News reported.

• Homebuilder confidence has dipped by one point, according to theNational Association of Home Builders (NAHB)/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index. “The outlook for home sales has improved somewhat in recent months, due largely to implementation of the first-time homebuyer tax credit and gains in housing affordability,” said NAHB Chairman Joe Robson, a home builder from Tulsa, Okla. “However, looking forward, homebuilders are facing a few headwinds, including expiration of the tax credit at the end of November; a recent upturn in interest rates; and especially the continuing lack of credit for housing production loans.” The index is based on a monthly survey of 548 homebuilders.

• The International Monetary Fund (IMF) raised its outlook for the United States and called for steps to reduce concern about increasing public debt and inflation, Bloomberg News reported. The IMF forecasts the United States’ gross domestic product (GDP) will contract 2.5 % this year before growing 0.75% next year, according to a statement today after an annual staff analysis the world’s largest economy. Previously, the IMF’s World Economic Outlook report, released in April, had the United States’ economy contracting 2.8% this year, before stalling in 2010.

• President Barack Obama yesterday (Monday) told the largest doctors group in the country that changes are needed in areas from insurance to payment procedures to lower costs and cover the uninsured, MarketWatch.com reported. “What I am trying to do and what a public option will help do,” he said to the American Medical Association, “is put affordable health care within reach for millions of Americans.” The group said last week it opposes any public plan that forces doctors to participate or expands Medicare or pays Medicare rates. In his weekly radio address on Saturday, Obama laid out a proposal to cut $313 billion in government health spending, saying the reductions in Medicare and Medicaid payments to health-care providers would increase efficiency and the quality of care, while setting aside about $950 billion for reform over the next 10 years.

• In a sign that more Americans are curbing their discretionary spending, Six Flags Inc. (OTC: SIXF) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on Saturday, Reuters reported. The New York-based company said the move will deleverage its balance sheet by $1.8 billion and eliminate $300 billion in redeemable preferred stock obligations. Day-to-day operation of its 20 parks will not be affected, and the filing “paves the way for a full revival of the company,” Chief Executive Officer Mark Shapiro said.

Source: Investment News Briefs Tuesday, June 16, 2009