Throughout the “sh*t hitting the fan” events of last fall, and the subsequent policy response, we’ve listened intently on what this Canadian had to say. The picture he paints today is one of bearish conviction. That’s exactly the reason he’s come under recent criticism as his ilk of ivory tower economists have started calling an end to this recession.

Though we don’t think he has anything to prove, he released a special report reaffirming his key points. You can read it in full here. But if you don’t have the time to peruse the twenty-two page (slightly wonkish) document, we’ve broken down the basic takeaway for you.

The equity markets have moved too far, too fast, and a correction is coming. Rather than buy into this rally, you should look at commodities. That’s because David believes that since 2001commodities took off on a secular bull market run.

Also, rather than hold US dollars, Rosie bets that the Canadian buck is a safer bet due to Canada’s smaller national debt (26% of GDP vs. 62% in the US), smaller budget deficit (-3.4% of GDP vs. -11.2% in the US), stronger banking sector (no Canadian bank needed a bailout), lower unemployment, and an economy more reliant on commodity exports like lumber, oil, natural gas and precious metals.

But the scariest–for holders of US dollars—forecast Rosie makes is that the US has yet to use a power policy tool: the devaluing of the greenback.

As Obama continues to take pages out of FDR’s playbook, he’s yet to devalue the dollar as FDR did in 1933. Rosenberg doesn’t say that the US policy wizards will directly devalue the dollar. Rather, he thinks it will happen by the expansion of the Fed’s balance sheet and the creation of freshly printed dollars.

We think he’s dead on about this call. The US’s “strong dollar” policy has become the latest oxymoron to enter the American vernacular. There is only one direction the value of the US dollar is going over the long-term—down.

Where exactly should you invest amidst this economic malaise? Here are the seven places to park your cash. Not surprisingly, our favorite precious metal tops the list.

1.) Gold

2.) Commodities

3.) The Canadian dollar

4.) Resource sectors of the stock market

5.) US sectors that have high foreign exposure (materials, tech, staples, healthcare)

6.) Canadian sectors that benefit from lower import costs (consumer stocks) but lose export competitiveness (manufacturers)

7.) Canadian bonds (a higher Canadian dollar will keep inflation low, hence reinforcing positive fixed income returns)

There may be a growing sense that because the stock market has enjoyed a nice bounce, credit spreads have come in and new issue activity has perked up, that somehow things are going to get better in the real economy. Not so fast. We may be out of the hurricane, but it’s still raining outside. The economy bottomed in the summer of 1932 but the Depression did not end for another nine years and as a reminder, by the end of that decade, after seven years of grandiose New Deal stimulus, the unemployment rate was still at 15%, consumer prices were deflating at a 2% rate and we still had yet to reach the pre-Depression peak in GDP.

Better does not mean good, and we must all brace ourselves for a much more frugal future. This does not mean the world falls apart. It means that lifestyles are going to change: frugality replaces frivolity, the family budget plan includes more savings for retirement and education, attitudes towards credit and discretionary spending shift, and owning the largest home on the block and the flashiest car is no longer going to be fashionable.

As Bill Bonner noted in Friday’s DR, USA Today was prompted to run a headline, “Inflation may be worse than the consumer price index shows.” Alas, I can’t find the article online, but I’m going to chalk this one up in the “Perceptions are changing” column, along with the CNN Money piece I cited last week, and the Kevin Phillips article in Harper’s that started this ball rolling.

On the other hand, in the “Power elite push-back” column we have a story from the Christian Science Monitor trying to explain away the gap between statistics and reality: “The short answer: [The situation is] bad enough, but don’t judge the problem only by what it costs to fill a fuel tank.” And, “Critics say the index has important flaws. But in general, economists across the political spectrum say the system works pretty well.” The story cheerily quotes Merrill chief economist David Rosenberg about how prices “for everything from clothing and furniture to toys and TVs” have fallen in the last year. Um, yeah, because demand for those items has fallen, because people are spending more on food and energy? I expect better of the sober, sensible Monitor, but this piece of journalistic bilge is right up there with the David Leonhardt column in the NYT I picked apart last week.

The Monitor story does note a CNN/Opinion Research poll in which 47% of adults surveyed cite inflation as the biggest economic concern. Nothing else — housing, unemployment, you name it — scored even half that high. Bad news for the Fed, which cares not a whit about money supply (hence its decision to cease publishing M3 figures in 2006) but cares very, very much about inflation expectations.

Source: Keeping Tabs on Inflation, and Perceptions

At the time, our debt stood at $7 trillion, with interest payments in fiscal 2003 totaling $318 billion. But now the U.S. national debt stands above $ 9 trillion, with interest payments in fiscal 2007 adding $ 1.4 billion a day.

But the Fed and Treasury have engineered a strategy to pay off the debt with weaker and weaker dollars. And guess what? So far, so good. Since November 2002, the dollar has fallen against the euro more than 50 percent since its high in October 2000. Of course, this is not the first time we’ve gone through a managed devaluation of the currency. In the 34 – year period since Nixon slammed the gold window shut and subsequently ended the Bretton Woods exchange rate mechanism, we’ve had only five major currency trends:

1. Weak dollar 1972 – 1978 (7 years)
2. Strong dollar 1979 – 1985 (7 years)
3. Weak dollar 1986 – 1995 (10 years)
4. Strong dollar 1996 – 2001 (6 years)
5. Weak dollar 2002 – (? years)

The most notable period spanned the 10 years from 1986 through 1995. Then as now, the United States was fighting a historic current account deficit through managed debasement of its currency. But because the present bear market only began in February of 2002, the current cycle looks like it still has a number of years to run.

In the best-case scenario, if the current bear market follows the trajectory set by the 1986 – 1995 slump, we could see a weakening dollar for up to 10 years. This presents an opportunity for selling the dollar in one of four ways: direct and indirect speculations, using short- and long-term options for each. These plays will help you safely position your money outside the dollar bear market. And you stand to make a fair amount of money, too.

But there is great danger ahead. Since the trade deficit passed the $ 759 billion mark – 6.3 percent of GDP – foreigners now must shell out about $ 1.5 billion a day just to keep the dollar afloat. And even during the managed dollar decline of 2003, the trade imbalance continued to grow. In 2005, Stephen Roach, Morgan Stanley’s chief global strategist, predicted that the current account deficit at the time was on course to reach $ 710 billion – 6.5 percent of GDP. He was short by only a few billion.

Herein lies the drama. The Bank of Japan spent the equivalent of $187 billion in 2003 – and $67 billion in January 2004 alone – in a bid to prevent its strengthening currency from choking off the country’s export-led recovery. In dollar terms, the Bank of Japan is now spending more than $ 1.5 billion every day trying to keep the yen from strengthening against the greenback.

Over a four-week period in the fall of 2003, combined foreign central bank purchases of U.S. securities topped $ 40 billion, more than $ 2 billion every trading day. Yet these central bank billions managed merely to limit the greenback’s decline to just 2.3 percent over the same period. Can you imagine what would have happened if the banks hadn’t pumped that money into the Fed’s reserves? One former currency trader has asked, “If $40 billion cannot bring about even a minor rally, just how weak and despised is the once – almighty dollar?”

We have relied on the kindness of strangers for too long. “We’re like the untrustworthy brother – in – law who keeps borrowing money, promising to pay it back, but can never seem to get out of debt,” Jim Rogers writes. “Eventually, people cut that guy off.”

There is no way the United States can possibly pay off its creditors should they decide to cash in their IOUs. Right now, the United States holds only about $ 70 billion in reserves against its obligations – much less than 2005’s $ 87 billion. That would last about three minutes should creditors begin to sell the dollar, rather than trying to support it.

It’s hard to imagine, isn’t it? The world’s reserve currency spiraling downward, out of control. But then, that’s what the British must have thought in 1992 when they attempted to manage a devaluation of the pound. Despite the Bank of England’s best efforts, sterling got away from them; the currency collapsed and Britain was kicked out of the Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) established to pave the way for the euro. On that day, known as Black Wednesday in Britain, currency speculator George Soros is rumored to have made as much as $ 2 billion. Don’t be surprised if more fortunes emerge in the future as the dollar slips dangerously close to free fall.

By flooding the system with liquidity, the Fed cannot control the value of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies; nor can they control its purchasing power – at least not indefinitely. The Fed’s current policies can “give the majority of investors the illusion of wealth as asset markets appreciate, ” wrote Marc Faber in November 2003, “while the loss of the currency’s purchasing power is hardly noticed. This is particularly true of a society that has a very large domestic market, where 90 percent of the people don’t have a passport and therefore know little about what is going on outside their own continent. And where the import prices of manufactured goods are in continuous decline because of the entry of China, as a huge new supplier of products with an extremely low cost structure, into the global market economy.” If that’s the case, you should look at any declines in the dollar as an opportunity to make some money.

The dollar is the single biggest element of risk in the world of finance today. Rearrange the current system of world finance ever so slightly, let confidence in the greenback falter, and the mighty dollar could go up in flames. There are many ways to hedge against this risk. Better still, there are many ways to profit from the likelihood the dollar will fall. Some methods are direct, some indirect. Some are leveraged, some unleveraged. There is a methodology for every taste, but before explaining the specifics, we ask: What ails the dollar?

The dollar is a victim of its own success. It is America’s most successful export ever – more successful than chewing gum, Levi’s, Coca – Cola, or even Elvis Presley, Britney Spears, and Madonna put together. Trillions of dollars flow through the global financial markets every week, and they are readily accepted at large and small – and clandestine – business establishments from Kiev to Karachi.

Today, there are simply too many dollars in circulation for the currency’s own good. Why? Americans have been living beyond their means for more than two decades. The U.S. dollar’s problems stem from a single cause. “If there’s a bubble,” wrote David Rosenberg, chief economist at Merrill Lynch, ” it’s in this four – letter word: debt. The U.S. economy is just awash in it. “

You’ve seen it firsthand: John Q. Public now holds more credit cards and outstanding loans – with a higher and higher total debt load – than ever before. Outstanding consumer credit, including mortgage and other debt, reached $ 9.3 trillion in April 2003 – a significant increase from its $ 7 trillion total in January 2000 – but by the third quarter of 2007, debt had nearly doubled since 2000, to $ 13.7 trillion. With consumer spending alone responsible for approximately 70 percent of U.S. GDP, that’s quite a hefty personal debt load.

The corporate debt picture is no better. American companies have never depended so much on sales of their corporate bonds. Between 2002-2007, investment – grade corporate bond sales increased nearly 60 percent, growing from $598 billion to $951 billion. But junk bond sales for that same period broke the bank, surging from $57 billion to $133 billion.

The third leg of the debt problem, following consumer and business debt, is Uncle Sam. Government debt as of November 7, 2007, officially passed $ 9,000,000,000,000. That’s about $ 30,000 for every man, woman, and child in the country. This total includes debt owned by many types of investors, from individuals to corporations to Federal Reserve banks and especially to foreign interests. (By 2004, foreign central banks had stockpiled more than $ 1.3 trillion worth of dollar – denominated Treasury bonds and agency bonds at the Federal Reserve. By 2007, foreign debt had nearly doubled, to $ 2.033 trillion.)

But if the central bank does pare short-term interest rates, it’s likely to be the last such move in awhile; the Fed will take a break and give its rate cuts a chance to work their way through the U.S. economic system.

Despite an active-economic-calendar schedule this week – which includes a report on first-quarter gross-domestic product, and several other statistics that could confirm that the U.S. economy is entrenched in a recession – the Fed’s machinations should dominate this week’s headlines, given that the central bank’s interest-rate-setting arm is set to meet Tuesday and Wednesday.

Any announcements about interest rates will be made at 2:15 p.m. Wednesday. Experts also say that whatever the Fed says about its expectations will be just as important as what it actually does to the benchmark Federal Funds rate.

“I don’t think there’s any question that they’ll cut [a quarter-percentage point] off the rate,” David Rosenberg, chief economist for Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. (MER), told The International Herald Tribune. “The real question is what they say about the future. It won’t be an ‘all clear’ signal. But they’ll find a way to tell the markets that they’ve done enough for now, simply put.”
Not everyone agrees.

“There is no reason why the Fed should be cutting rates right now,” Richard Yamarone, director of economic research at Argus Research Corp., told MarketWatch.com.

Yamarone may be thinking back to some of the public comments certain of the central bankers themselves have been making.

Back on April 18, Fed officials hinted that they would be reluctant to cut the benchmark Federal Funds rate yet again, given that the slumping U.S. economy also faced a major inflationary threat. Indeed, Philadelphia Fed President Charles Plosser warned against believing that interest-rate cuts were “the solution to most, if not all, economic ills.”

Plosser is one of the Fed’s major anti-inflation hawks At the time, Plosser was merely the latest in a string of policy-makers to warn about the rising risks of inflation, essentially suggesting that another rate cut would probably be a very tough sell.

In a speech at Drexel University’s LeBow College of Business in Philadelphia, Plosser said real interest rates were now at “an accommodative level, meaning borrowing costs were low enough to start boosting the U.S. economy’s growth rate back toward its normal historical norm, Reuters reported.

The futures market is projecting a Fed Funds rate of 1.75% by the end of this year. Here’s a look at the futures market’s month-by-month expectations for short-term borrowing costs for the remainder of 2008:

• April: 2.17%.
• May: 1.89%.
• June: 1.85%
• July 1.79%.
• August 2008: 1.76%.
• September 2008: 1.76%.
• October 2008: 1.77%.
• December 2008: 1.73%.

The worries about inflation that Plosser and other inflation hawks have are very real. And those concerns don’t exist solely on our side of the Atlantic. The low U.S. rates are contributing to a weakness in the greenback that’s sent the American currency to record lows against most other key world currencies. That’s fueling a massive run-up in the cost of energy and food-related imports – and that’s inflationary for U.S. buyers.

But it’s made U.S. exports very competitive abroad, acting almost as a big discount for foreign buyers of such wares as Boeing Co. (BA) jetliners. In fact, just last week Boeing surprised Wall Street with record earnings and announced a record order backlog. And pan-European arch-rival Airbus SAS., was forced to announce a price increase on several  of its commercial airliners – because of rising steel prices and because of the falling dollar.

French Economy Minister Christine Lagarde yesterday (Sunday) that the gap between the U.S. and Eurozone interest rates was way too large, and called for a change in rate policies on one side of the Atlantic, or the other.

“We are in a delicate situation where we have, on the one hand, an American Federal (Reserve) which has a policy of very low rates and a European Central Bank which has maintained high interest rates,” Lagarde told LCI Television and RTL Radio, the global wire service Reuters reported. “The differential in interest between the two, it seems to me, is a little too big at the moment.”

Paris has long been a vocal critic of what French President Nicolas Sarkozy has termed the ECB’s overly narrow focus on fighting inflation – and has previously been criticized by Germany for meddling in the business of the “independent” central bank.

With Eurozone inflation running at about 3.6% – its highest rate since the measure for that portion of the European market began in 1997, the European Central Bank (ECB) has left its key refinancing interest rate unchanged at 4.0%, despite some very definite signs that Eurozone growth is slowing.

By comparison, the key U.S. interest rate is at 2.25%, though it may be heading lower this week, and inflation is “officially” said to be at right about 4% – though such experts as Money Morning Contributing Editor Martin Hutchinson believe the actual U.S. inflation rate is actually much higher.

Although the FOMC meeting is likely to top the economic the economic news of the week this week, the GDP report will come in a fairly close second and will be nearly as closely watched by some experts. The reason: Many eternal pessimists are expecting the report to show negative growth during that three-month period.

Why is that important? Simple: According to the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), two consecutive quarters of negative growth constitutes a recession.

Most folks “feel” like the U.S. economy is already in a recession. An official designation by the NBER – which usually comes well after the fact – would simply make it official.

In the meantime, some of these other reports this week could help serve as an interim and unofficial “confirmation” of that dour diagnosis of the U.S. economy:

• The health of the manufacturing sector will get a solid assessment via Thursday’s release of the much-watched ISM survey and Friday’s report on factory orders.
• The all-important U.S. labor markets will get significant scrutiny via Thursday’s report on initial jobless claims and Friday’s reports on the U.S. unemployment rate and on non-farm payroll data.
• We’ll get a bit more insight into the psyche of the American consumer with Tuesday’s report on consumer confidence for the month of April and Thursday’s report on personal income and spending for the month of March.
• And we’ll get an overview of Corporate America’s health, as U.S. energy giants Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) and Chevron Corp. (CVX) reveal how their profit reports have been boosted by record energy prices [likely also prompting new calls for Congressional investigations into allegations of price gouging].  Starbucks Corp. (SBUX) will follow up recent warning with an actual announcement, while Office Depot Inc. (ODP) and Radio Shack Corp. (RSH) will give investors a look inside the world of retail.

Market Matters

Two weeks ago, investors disregarded any semblance of bad news (and lately, there has been plenty) and instead took the stock indices to their highest levels in months. Last week, investors allowed the earnings releases to guide their trading activities while awaiting the Fed’s interest-rate decision and commentary.

So just what did the recent earnings reports say about the current state of Corporate America?

Financialscontinue to stoke the negativity (no surprise there) with Bank of America Corp. (BAC), investment banker Credit Suisse Group (CS), and bond insurer Ambac Financial Group Inc. (ABK) reporting more disappointing results.  Drugmakers, on the other hand, enjoyed a nice quarter with Merck & Co. Inc. (MRK) and Novartis AG (NVS) beating expectations.  While a sluggish economy can’t keep folks out of McDonald’s Corp. (MCD) (as least in its international markets), it does seem to be impacting coffee intake as Starbucks warned that this week’s results (and those for all of 2008) will miss earlier projections.  Of course, dire times lead to more nervous smoking (and higher cigarette sales) as happy Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) shareholders found out this quarter.  While cost-conscious folks stayed home and watched more DVDs, Netflix Inc. (NFLX) warned that future subscriber growth may be limited.

Both Delta Air Lines Inc. (DAL) and Northwest Airlines Corp. (NWA) posted sizable losses on skyrocketing fuel costs, leading some analysts to question the wisdom behind the proposed merger. While the world’s largest shipper, United Parcel Service Inc. (UPS), experienced a jump in profits, management expressed concern about the quarters to follow, since consumers just don’t seem quite as interested in finding out “what Brown can do for you.”  Even techs, which previously had been a savings grace for the market, turned pessimistic this week.  Apple Inc. (AAPL) and Texas Instruments Inc. (TXN) reported decent earnings, but warned about their respective outlooks.

Likewise, high-tech bellwether Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) disappointed with its profit numbers, while investors wait with trepidation to see what becomes of Microsoft’s bid for Yahoo! Inc., (YHOO). Meanwhile, Yahoo beat “The Street’s” expectations. However, the three-week deadline that Microsoft gave Yahoo to come to an agreement on its unsolicited bid passed Saturday without any announcement from either side, leading to the possibility that the battle for Yahoo is about to turn hostile, MarketWatch.com reported.

ConocoPhillips (COP) showed that record energy prices are not hurting everyone, as the No. 3 U.S. oil company reported a 17% increase in profits.

Transactions typically imply growing confidence in corporate boardrooms as management finds the value in certain acquisition targets.  Last week, News Corp. (NWS.A) moved closer to buying Newsday and giving Rupert Murdock greater control over the New York press.

Insurance giant Liberty Mutual Holding Co. Inc. agreed to buy SAFECO Corp. (SAF) in a $6.2 billion deal that will create the 5th-largest property and casualty firm.  Triarc Cos. Inc. (TRY) soon may be adding those terrific “hot-and-juicy” square burgers and addictive Frosty drinks to its Arby’s roast-beef-sandwich menus as it looks to acquire Wendy’s International (WEN) in a deal valued at $2.34 billion. And, of course, there’s still the Microsoft-Yahoo proposal.

With a mixed week on the earnings front, stocks traded relatively flat as investors took some profits from last week’s newfound bullish sentiment, while still searching for a bargain or two.

Economically Speaking

For many Fed-watchers, the prospect for another rate cut has been a foregone conclusion.  After all, central bank Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and clan have let their creative juices flow [not to be confused with the creative juices of those Wendy’s hamburgers] over the past few months; the Fed has tried everything from the aggressive rate-cutting campaign to liquidity injections to arranging the buyout of The Bear Stearns Cos. Inc. (BSC) by JPMorgan Chase & Co. Inc. (JPM).

Suddenly, some great prognosticators believe the Fed may be “seven and done” as they drop the Federal Funds rate again (by a minimal quarter of a percentage point this time around) – before going on a “summer hiatus” to give their earlier work the time to take effect.

With oil prices hovering around the (once unheard of) $120/barrel level, some policymakers are sure to claim that inflation should be considered as critical a concern as the sluggish housing market to the U.S. economy’s health. Indeed, comments such as those of Philly Fed President Plosser make it clear that inflation is already becoming an increasingly important consideration.

Additionally, the European Central Bank seems content to keep its lending rate at 4%, so further Fed actions will continue to have devastating impact on the value of the dollar.

The economic calendar was relatively light last week as analysts rested up for this week’s vast array of important data. After a surprising climb (better known now as an aberration) in February, existing home sales plunged again in March, while new homes sales fell to their lowest level in more than 16 years.

Furthermore, the median price of a new home dropped by more than 13% last month, the largest such decline in almost four decades.

Durable goods orders fell in March, as well, although once the volatile transportation sector was removed from the equation, the results did not look half bad.

We hope that investors and analysts got plenty of rest over the weekend to get ready for the bustle of economic reports due throughout this week. Talk of recession should resume with the release of the first-quarter GDP, which many eternal pessimists believe will show negative growth during that three-month stretch.

Weekly Economic Calendar