Since the stock market rally reached a pinnacle nearly two weeks ago, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has lost about 3.3% while the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index has fallen about 3.7%. And if this week’s earnings report come in below expectations, the rally that helped stock prices surge more than 50% could come to an abrupt end.

Fortunately, many of the companies set to report earnings this week are traditionally strong performers and for the most part, companies that have weathered the financial crisis. But not all of them have met Wall Street’s expectations.

The quarterly results for five companies in particular – Yum! Brands Inc. (NYSE: YUM), Alcoa Inc. (NYSE: AA), Costco Wholesale Corp. (Nasdaq: COST), Monsanto Corp. (NYSE: MON) and PepsiCo Inc. (NYSE: PEP) – will of particular interest to investors.

Yum! Brands Inc.

Scheduled to report today (Tuesday), the Louisville, Ky.-based Yum! will be one of the first companies to report its quarterly take.

As owner of the Taco Bell, Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) and Pizza Hut brands, Yum! is the world’s largest restaurant company. Even more impressive, the company has beaten the market’s consensus forecast in the last four quarterly reporting periods.

Analysts’ estimates for the quarter ending September 2009 range from a low of 52 cents a share to a high of 63 cents a share, with a consensus of $0.59 a share. Yum will lean heavily on its international business if it’s going to continue its trend of topping analysts’ estimates.

Yum! is a well balanced company with about 41% of its 2008 operating profit coming from the United States and the rest from overseas – particularly China.

By 2013, China will account for 40% of Yum’s operating profit – up from 28% in 2008 – while the United States and the rest of the world will each account for a 30% share, according to company projections.

KFC, in particular, has long seen its most robust growth coming from China, with less than 10% of its franchises on the mainland accounting for more than a quarter of the company’s earnings.

Yum! added 328 new restaurants in the second quarter, including 118 in Mainland China.

“Yum!’s global growth potential, consistent performance and track record of generating strong free cash flow give us the confidence and ability to return significant cash to our shareholders even in these challenging economic times,” said Yum! Chief Executive Officer David Novak.

An analyst with Credit Suisse Group AG (NYSE ADR: CS) earlier this week told Barron’s that Yum! shares deserve a better premium because of its large international footprint and ongoing reallocation of capital.

Yum! shares should trade at a premium to their peer group and could climb nearly 25%, a the analyst said.

Shares of Yum! surged 5.13% yesterday to close at $34.85.

Alcoa Inc.

Though its release comes a day after Yum’s, Alcoa’s quarterly report marks the unofficial start of earnings season.

Hit hard by the collapse of commodities prices and sluggish industrial demand, Alcoa has missed earnings expectations in three of the past four quarters. And the company’s latest earnings report will likely show that its struggles continued, albeit at a slower pace.

Alcoa is expected to report a net loss of 12 cents per share for the three months that ended in September. That’s down substantially from a profit of 37 cents a share in the same period last year, but would be a marked improvement on the 32 cents a share loss the company posted in the second quarter.

Indeed, Alcoa’s earnings will provide an important look at just how far global demand for industrial metals has come. Hopes are high, as Alcoa stock has surged more than 143% since mid-March.

Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB) analyst Jorge Beristain has increased his rating of Pittsburgh-based Alcoa to “Buy” from “Hold” and increased his price target to $17 from $12.

The upgrade partially reflects Deutsche Bank’s higher price projections for base metals. The bank sees base metal prices climbing an average of 31% next year, on account of strong third-quarter “price surges” and increased demand from China, Beristain said in a note to clients.

“China’s seemingly insatiable appetite for industrial raw materials has led to record high imports in many metals and a consequent tightening in market balances,” he said.

Alcoa’s stock rose 4.68% in trading yesterday, to close at $13.42 a share.

Costco Wholesale Corp.

Costco is the largest membership warehouse club chain in the world by sales volume. That makes it an ideal choice for cost-conscious consumers. Costco has enjoyed seven straight years of earnings growth, but the company’s past two quarters have disappointed investors.

The third time might be the charm for the nation’s largest warehouse chain. William Blair & Co. LLC analyst Mark Miller last month upgraded the stock to “Outperform” from “Market Perform” and after the company stepped up sales in August.

Sales at established locations declined 2%, beating Wall Street expectations for a larger 5.7% decline.

“With the step-up in sales during August and positive takeaways from our meeting last week with [Costco Chief Financial Officer] Richard Galanti and [Vice President of Financial Planning and Investor Relations] Bob Nelson, we are more confident that sales and earnings could meaningfully surpass Street expectations over the next year,” said Miller.

Like Yum!, Costco could receive a significant bump from its overseas operations, as recent store openings in Asia have been strong and the dollar has weakened.

For the third quarter, the average analysts’ estimate is for a profit of 76 cents a share – a 17% drop from the 92 cents a share it earned in the same quarter last year.

Costco CEO Jim Sinegal said earlier this month in an interview with Motley Fool that he expects his company to turn around regardless of whether or not the economy experiences a quick recovery.

“We can always blame bad sales on weather and on economic conditions and everything else,” he said. “But when we have the right merchandise out on the floor, it sells. … [We] don’t like the fact that the [average customer] basket is down, but we certainly like the fact that the customers are coming back more frequently and, as things turn, they will start to buy again. Now it is on us to get the hot merchandise.”

Costco stock edged up 0.73% yesterday to close at $56.88 a share.

Monsanto Co.

As the world’s largest producer of genetically modified seeds, Monsanto is a closely watched biotech bellwether. Like Alcoa, Monsanto was hit in recent quarters by a drop in commodities prices, as well as a drop in demand for its products.

However, the company announced an acquisition, a partnership, and a divestiture in its fiscal fourth quarter. It is expected to squeeze out a one cent per share profit, compared to three cents per share loss in the same quarter last year.

Monsanto’s acquisition of WestBred LLC – a Montana-based company that specializes in wheat germplasm – will bring wheat into its seeds and traits portfolio, and its joint venture with Dole Fresh Vegetables, Inc. will put more genetically modified vegetables on Monsanto’s plate. Meanwhile, Monsanto’s divestiture of its global sunflower assets to Syngenta brought in $160 million.

The company also shed 9,000 employees in a bid to cut costs, and despite being heavily targeted by anti-trust groups and chief rival E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. (NYSE: DD), Monsanto insists it’s on track to more than double its 2007 profit by the year 2012.

“We have committed to using our technology to double yields in our three core crops – corn, soybeans and cotton – by 2030, while reducing our use of key resources by one-third per unit produced,” said Monsanto Chairman and CEO Hugh Grant. “Innovation has us well on our way to achieving this, with our most robust pipeline ever. We’re on the verge of an unprecedented technology explosion that will deliver the types of products growers want most – those that offer greater yield and value.”

By 2012, Monsanto expects its gross profit from its core seeds and traits business to be between $7.3 billion and $7.5 billion – about 2.5 times its 2007 level. Grant said this increase will be facilitated by the development of seven new “high impact technologies” that by 2020 will boost revenue by $3 billion.

Monsanto has reported better-than-expected earnings in the past three quarters, and at Monday’s close of $74.85 a share is an undervalued stock according to Morningstar.

“Monsanto is a fierce competitor that continues to dominate a market that it essentially created more than a decade ago,” said Morningstar senior analyst Ben Johnson. “Through its ongoing commitment to research and development and assertive capital allocation, the company has positioned itself to grow value for its shareholders over the long haul.”

PepsicCo Inc.

Of all the companies reporting this week, PepsiCo has generated the most buzz. Bullish speculators yesterday piled into PepsiCo call options after Deutsche Bank raised its earnings for the salty-snack-and-soda giant.

Call volume surged by nearly 700%, according to optionMonster.

Deutsche Bank raised its price target for PepsiCo shares, which closed yesterday at $60.85, to $70 from $66. The bank maintained its buy rating on the stock, and said shares have been negatively affected by an “unwarranted deal overhang” related to the company’s acquisition of Pepsi Bottling Group Inc (NYSE: PBG).

PepsiCo in August said it would merge with Pepsi Bottling, as well as invest in Russia, during the three months that ended in September, and is expected to post a profit of $1.02 per share – four cents per share less than a year ago. Revenue for the quarter is expected to come to $11.3 billion, about the same as last year.

PepsiCo has only missed expectations in one of the past four quarters, and by just two cents at that.

Source: The Five Stocks to Watch This Week

Now, JPMorgan Chase & Co.  (NYSE: JPM) has issued a report suggesting that investment-banking returns on capital will be sharply down over the next few years. Perhaps this will be only a moderate downturn.

However, there’s also a good chance that labor-cost pressures – combined with tightening margins – will take the likes of JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS) down a path similar to that of General Motors Corp. (NYSE: GRM) and Chrysler Group LLP, both of which earlier this year declared bankruptcy.

Challenging Headwinds

JPMorgan anticipates that the regulatory changes that are likely to take place over the next year or so will reduce investment banks’ return on equity (ROE) to around 11% – down from its previous forecast of 15%.

More capital will be needed for trading activity, which naturally reduces the return on capital from that activity. However, there will also be effects from new transparency requirements on derivatives. (Most – if not all – derivatives will have to be traded and cleared across central exchanges.) And tighter limits on commodities positions will prevent firms from cornering less-active markets.

This effect will be concentrated on investment banks themselves – firms such as Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) – as well as on the investment banking activities of such firms as Credit Suisse Group AG (NYSE: CS), Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB), Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C), and JPMorgan Chase.

Old-fashioned commercial banking, on the other hand, will likely become somewhat more profitable. That’s because the sharp reduction in securitization activity has reduced the excessive competition for much of the lending business. It’s also improved the lending business profitability.

Investment banks will have to reduce their headcount by another 3% from present levels and cut their overall cost per employee by another 15%, to around $543,000 in 2011, according to the JPMorgan study.

What agony! (Actually, that joke is not quite fair – the cost per employee includes the building, the equipment and all the fancy information services, so the take-home is much less. Even so, these guys – at least those who keep their jobs – won’t starve.)

The New Reality

We are so used to investment banking growing and becoming increasingly more profitable – on virtually an uninterrupted basis – that we have never even considered what might happen if that trend were to reverse.

Even after last year’s crash, Goldman Sachs reported record second quarter profits in 2009. Spreads in all kinds of trading widened dramatically and Goldman found its market share dramatically increased after the demise of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (OTC: LEHMQ).

But here’s the thing: The trillions of dollars poured into the markets by the U.S. Treasury Department and the U.S. Federal Reserve were the driving force behind those profits. Investment banks like Goldman weren’t just given a level playing field – they were given one that was essentially (and artificially) cleared of obstacles. Even the few “competitors” that remained were hobbled by their past mismanagement.

Investment banking is not particularly difficult or intellectually challenging. And the proliferation of new and complex products that turbocharged the profit growth of investment banks during the past few decades won’t continue. Any new financial product will be forced to run a gauntlet of regulatory bureaucrats before being allowed to emerge.

Had the credit-default swap (CDS) been invented today, can anyone doubt that it would have been fenced in by restrictions so onerous that the damaging derivative would have never made it to market? The painful memories of last year’s near-unraveling of the global financial markets are still fresh. So it’s unlikely that investment banks would be able to get the regulatory nod for a big-risk strategy that is likely to result in a taxpayer bailout.

The bottom line is clear: The reduction in U.S. investment banking profitability is likely to be permanent, with various rent-seeking scams blocked. In this post-crisis era, investment pools from China, the Middle East and other parts of Asia – backed by increasingly sophisticated financial players in those markets – will acquire the necessary capabilities to enter the market and further reduce the returns of domestic investment banks.

We have seen this before: An industry, previously very profitable, finds itself hemmed in by government restrictions and its most-profitable products get regulated out of existence. Foreign competition enters the market and grinds away at the domestic market share.

The natural reduction of competitors doesn’t happen, as one or more are bailed out by taxpayers and survive to continue competing for the business.  Legacy costs of remuneration promises made when things were better place an ever-increasing burden on the industry’s returns. Reducing the work force pay becomes very difficult, as the workers have great power over production and resist the necessary downsizing of their excessive pay.

Sound familiar? Last time, it was the U.S. auto industry, and the eventual result was the bankruptcy of GM and Chrysler. Reducing pay to a work force when market conditions become harsh is extremely difficult, if now downright impossible.

Of course, investment bankers have no United Automobile Workers (UAW) representing them. But shareholders will know from past experience that the investment-banking work force’s ability to suck up available profits is huge, whereas losses suddenly devolve back on shareholders.

Don’t forget, militant autoworkers could only beat up “scabs” when their livelihood was threatened. Militant traders could re-jig the computer systems so that the trading algorithms worked backwards, producing losses instead of profits. In an era of credit default swaps and millisecond trading, this could wipe out shareholders in half an hour of frantic activity before anyone realized what had gone wrong in an era of credit default swaps and millisecond trading.

It may take a couple of decades for the investment banking business to decline, as it did for the much larger U.S. auto industry. But by 2030, collapse could loom.

The comparison isn’t a stretch. In fact, it wasn’t just a ticker-symbol letter – “G” – that  the two companies shared: GS for Goldman Sachs, and GM when General Motors was still a public company. It turns out that their underlying business models also shared similar strategic flaws. And those flaws put the two on a similar path to ruin at the hands of forces that grew out of the crises in their particular industries – crises that they each helped create.

Source: Could Goldman Sachs Share GM’s Fate?

Shares of Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL) have gained 100% since the start of the year, and with the likely release of an innovative “tablet” computer and the pending debut of its wildly popular iPhone in China both in the offing, the company’s stock could still find some room to run.

Shares in the Cupertino, Calif.-based company are at their highest level since August 2008, thanks to a successive string of upbeat earnings reports, a near-$30 billion cash reserve and recession-defying sales of its products.

The iPhone alone sold 5.2 million units in the second quarter, compared to 717,000 the year before, and its Macintosh computers, which still have a miniscule share compared to Windows-based PCs, are gaining momentum.

Several market research firms, including Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB) and Barclays PLC (NYSE ADR: BCS), now have price targets for Apple stock that exceed $200 a share.

Apple’s shares closed Friday at $170.05, up 60 cents, or 0.35%, each. An advance to $200 would represent a gain of about 18% from current levels.

Sales of Apple’s now-ubiquitous iPod have slowed, but Apple executives anticipated that would be the case, as sales of its music-playing iPhone and iPod Touch grow.  Both of those devices have access to thousands of applications sold in the App Store.

A tablet computer from Apple, which has been a hot news topic in the tech world since last spring, moved closer to reality last week. The Wall Street Journal reported that since returning from leave to undergo aliver transplant, Apple Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer Steve Jobs has devoted almost all of his time to this specific device.

Pundits have already dubbed the gadget the “MacBook Tablet” or “iTablet,” and executives believe it will have positive implications for media going forward.

“It’s a portable entertainment device,” one entertainment executive toldThe Financial Times. “It’s going to be fabulous for watching movies.”

Recording executives say Apple plans on using the large screen for interactive booklets and liner notes that typically accompany compact discs. And book publishers could view the tablet as an alternative to Amazon.com Inc.’s (NASDAQ: AMZN) popular Kindle or Sony Corp.’s (NYSE ADR: SNE) Reader in the growing e-book market.

Sign up below… and we’ll send you a new investment report for free: “Credit Crisis Report.”

“It would be a color, flat-panel TV to the old-fashioned, black-and-white TV of the Kindle,” one book executive told the FT.

Hollywood and video game executives haven’t been briefed on the tablet, but both have shown optimism for it. A large selection of movies and games are already available for the iPod, iPod Touch and iPhone.

Apple is one of the most secretive companies in Silicon Valley. Its iPhone 3G S, which sold 1 million units in its first weekend, wasn’t announced until a few days before its release. By contrast, one of its primary competitors Palm Inc.’s (NASDAQ: PALM) Pre smartphone, released a few weeks before the 3G S in June, was first announced in January at the Consumer Electronics Show. Apple is aiming for a September or October launch of the tablet, The FT said.

While tablet computers are nothing new – they first debuted in the early part of this decade – they only comprise 1.4% of the global portable market, The Journal said. Toshiba Corp., Hewlett-Packard Co. (NYSE:HPQ) and Fujitsu Ltd. (OTC ADR: FJTSY) all attempted to sell tablets, but ultimately the devices proved to be too cost-prohibitive for consumers.

Despite the worst economic downturn since World War II, Apple is having no trouble convincing consumers to buy iPhones with pricey plans and more expensive Macs. Oppenheimer & Co. analyst Yair Reiner told the FT he expects Apple’s tablet to cost between $600 and $1,000, the range for many Windows-based laptops today.

The tablet is considered by analysts to be Apple’s answer to popularnetbooks, which are smaller laptop PCs designed for navigating the Internet. They usually cost between $200 and $400. CEO Jobs and others in the Apple brass ruled out developing a netbook in a conference call last fall.

“We don’t know how to make a $500 computer that’s not a piece of junk,” Jobs said at the time.

The iPhone Meets the Red Dragon

Apple, whose Mac computers have played second fiddle to personal computers since 1984, found mainstream success in the gadget realm starting in 2002 when it debuted the iPod. To date, roughly 300 million iPods have been sold since 2002. In 2007, Apple debuted the iPhone, which has sold more than 26 million units.

The iPhone will make its debut in mainland China in the fourth quarter with state-owned China Unicom Ltd. (NYSE ADR: CHU) having cut a deal to act as the exclusive carrier for three years. Like AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) in the United States, Unicom will not share revenue with Apple. Instead, it will offer a subsidy to consumers to lower the price, which is expected have a similar $99 to $299 range with two-year service contracts.

Unicom, which is rolling out its third-generation network (3G), enabling wireless video and high-speed Internet navigation, has 141 million wireless users. Unicom will be competing with an estimated 1.5 million gray market iPhones, The Journal reports, citing research firm BDA China Ltd. Unicom, which just reported a 45% drop in profit, is counting on Apple’s iPhone to gain share over market leader China Mobile Ltd. (NYSE: CHL), which has over three times Unicom’s subscribers.

The overall Chinese mobile market, which has 687 million subscribers – more than twice the population of the United States – is highly competitive. Several phones running Google Inc.’s (Nasdaq: GOOG) Android operating system are due by year’s end, and China Telecom Ltd. (NYSE ADR: CHA) is in talks with BlackBerry maker Research in Motion Ltd. (Nasdaq: RIMM) and Palm to bring those phones to the world’s fastest-growing major market.

“It’s essential for Apple to be in China; it’s a huge market,” CIMB Securities Ltd. Deputy Head of Research Bertram Lai told Bloomberg News. The iPhone “is not just the premium product, it’s an aspirational product,” he said.

Source: Hot Stocks: Up 100%, Apple’s Shares May Still Have Room to Run ]]> http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/hot-stocks-up-100-apple%e2%80%99s-shares-may-still-have-room-to-run/20247/feed 0 http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-second-leg-of-the-housing-crisis/19734 http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/the-second-leg-of-the-housing-crisis/19734#comments Thu, 06 Aug 2009 22:30:04 +0000 Ian Mathias http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19734 According to one of the world’s biggest banks, 48% of U.S. mortgages will be underwater by 2011. Man… and the critics call us “doom and gloom”?

But that’s the word from Deutsche Bank (NYSE:DB) this week, which claims the number of U.S. mortgages worth more than the actual value of homes is going to double in the next couple of years. In line with our forecast yesterday, the bank is especially worried for prime and jumbo borrowers. 41% of prime borrowers will be underwater by 2011, says the DB forecast, up from 16% at the start of this year. Jumbos will be even worse, with a 46% underwater rate.

“The impact of this is significant given that these markets have the largest…

When the U.S. Commerce Department on Friday said the U.S. economy contracted at a 1% annual pace in the second quarter, the report was actually seen as good news: It was a slower decline than in each of the two prior quarters, and economists had expected a contraction of 1.5%.

“This is good news,” Nariman Behravesh, an economist with IHS Global Insight Inc. (NYSE: IHS), told The San Francisco Chronicle.

But here’s the wild card: Although government spending did increase during the April-to-June quarter, only about 7.7% – $60.4 billion – of U.S. President Barack Obama’s stimulus package had actually made its way into the U.S. economy by June 30, the quarter’s official conclusion. Of that total, the largest component went to U.S. states to help defray the jump in Medicaid costs, CNNMoney.com reported.

Much of the $43 billion in stimulus tax relief – including the “Making Work Pay” tax credit for individual workers – also took effect during the second quarter, CNNMoney said.

At this point, it’s really difficult to “see how the effect of stimulus has been very large,” Edward Lazear, an economics professor at Stanford’s Graduate School of Business – who served as an advisor to former U.S. President George W. Bush – told CNN. “Very little has gone out.”
And that’s the problem.

In short, it looks like we’re already experiencing an economic rebound – without the Obama stimulus having really even kicked in … yet. In fact, the impatience over the continued U.S. malaise, the slowness of the economic turnaround and the fact that when growth does return we’re almost assured of a “jobless recovery” actually has some Washington legislators already pushing for a second stimulus.

That means the economy will be in rebound mode when nearly three-quarters of a trillion dollars in stimulus money starts to flow in. Dumping all that money into an already-growing economy won’t just serve as a simple tailwind that gives the economy a gentle push; it will be more like the head-snapping start followed by the thunderous charge down the quarter mile that we see from one of the supercharged Top Fuel Funny Cars driven by National Hot Rod Association (NHRA) star John Force. (From a standing start, Top Fuel Funny Cars cover a quarter mile in less than five seconds at speeds well in excess of 325 miles per hour).

And there’s only one outcome from that scenario – rampant inflation. In fact, U.S. consumers are probably headed for the worst bout of inflationsince the 1980s. And that makes the so-called “exit strategy” of U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke all the more important.
To be sure, the Obama stimulus has given the economy a bit of a boost. So far:

• The states have deployed what stimulus money they have received, which helped fuel the biggest surge in state and local spending since 2007.
• Some early pieces of the stimulus – such as the $25 increase in unemployment benefits – have allowed consumers to spend more.
• And one economist – Economic Policy Institute’s Josh Bivens – said Obama stimulus money may have boosted growth by as much as three percentage points during the second quarter.

But other economists say that – given the environment – the second-quarter GDP numbers were much too strong. After all, business spending dropped 8.9% and hours worked fell 7%. Somehow that doesn’t translate into a mere 1% drop in GDP. That latter figure will most certainly be revised downward in the future.

Unless or until that happens, look for the third quarter GDP statistics to give us a better picture of the U.S. economy’s health. Complaints that the promised stimulus money isn’t getting where it needs to be have Obama’s economic team working overtime to iron out the problems that keep cropping up.

Mark Thoma, an economics professor at the University of Oregon, toldCNNMoney that “the third quarter will be a critical time period for assessing the stimulus package.”

And for assessing the inflation threat – which Money Morning has repeatedly warned is a very real threat. Gold, commodities, and other hard assets will be key holdings. The same is true for dividend-paying stocks. And make sure to go global – the best growth prospects will continue to be overseas.

Market Matters

A report by the New York Attorney General’s Office claims the initial nine institutions that received Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) money paid out $33 billion in bonuses in 2008.  Of particular note, Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) and Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) rewarded a combined 900 employees (combined) with bonuses of at least $1 million, despite having received $45 billion each in government aid (and that doesn’t count the $3.6 billion Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. employees received).  Imagine how much they would have made if the companies were actually doing well?

While President Obama continued his road trip across America to promote health care reform, a group of conservative Democrats (Blue Dogs) came up with their version of a bill, but offered no timetable for completion.

Meanwhile, regulators pushed forward with proposed rules aimed at reducing speculation in the marketplace and focused on so-called “naked” short selling and on lpacing strict limits on commodities contracts.

In corporate news, deals were the theme of the week.  Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT) made amends with Yahoo! Inc. (Nasdaq: YHOO) and forged a 10-year partnership to cut into Google Inc.’s (Nasdaq:GOOG) share of the Internet search business. And International Business Machines Inc. (NYSE: IBM) is expanding its software empire with the purchase of SPSS Inc. (Nasdaq: SPSS) for $1.2 billion.

On the earnings front, energy companies highlighted the week’s reports and the results were not pretty (though were expected).  On a positive note, Motorola Inc. (NYSE: MOT) surprised analysts by reporting an unexpected profit, while offering a promising outlook, and Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB) continued the favorable trend among (previously depressed) financials by posting strong earnings on solid investment banking operations.

Investors digested the mixed earnings news and chose to focus more on the positives.  Despite a temporary setback in China (5% index decline before encouraging comments by its central bank), the Dow Jones Industrial Average moved higher late in the week after General Electric Co. (NYSE: GE) was upgraded to a “Buy” by a major analyst, a sign of an improving climate.  The Nasdaq Composite Index even flirted with 2,000 for the first time since October 2008, and theStandard & Poor’s 500 Index edged closer to 1,000, a level not seen since last November.

The Dow ended July with its best monthly performance since October 2002.  Japanese stocks moved to their highest levels in about 10 months and European equities soared to nine-month highs.  Bond investors breathed sighs of relief as a record $115 billion Treasury auctions came to a close and foreign bankers emerged as buyers on the final day.

Economically Speaking

Has Fed Chairman Bernanke suddenly become Mr. Optimist these days? Early in the week, he proclaimed that the financial debacle ultimately would produce favorable results as “not only will we will be back on track, but the economy will be stronger than it had been before this started.”  He also urged Congress to move forward with a regulatory reform package to ensure that such dire times will not be repeated.

The Fed’s Beige Book showed that the economy remained weak, though signs of stabilization and improvements in manufacturing, housing, and even labor are occurring across several regions of the country.  Some districts reported enhanced corporate hiring, particularly within the healthcare and technology sectors.

The afore-mentioned second-quarter GDP report was better than expected, giving yet another indication that the recession is drawing closer to an end.

Still, it’s a much deeper recession than most realized: For the first time since records have been kept (1947), economic activity has declined for four consecutive quarters.  New homes sales skyrocketed in June by 11%, the fourth increase in the last six months, and home prices even climbed on a month-over-month basis for the first time since July 2006 according to the S&P Case-Shiller index.

Durable good orders fell in June, though once the volatile transportation category was removed from the statistic, orders actually increased.  Consumer confidence fell in June, as ongoing pressures on the labor markets brought continued concerns and many Americans are refraining from major purchases (now and for the foreseeable future).

On the other hand, jobless claims rose in the most recent week, though analysts pointed to discrepancies from the auto industry.   Looking at the four-week moving average as a better gauge, claims for unemployment benefits actually fell to the lowest level since January and continuous claims unexpectedly declined, as well.

Weekly Economic Calendar

Source: Why the Obama Stimulus Has Us on a Collision Course with Inflation

The number was so big and the results beat Wall Street estimates by so much at a time when the credit crisis was wreaking havoc on so many other sectors that Oppenheimer & Sons (NYSE: OPY) oil analyst Fadel Gheit couldn’t help but quip that he didn’t think Exxon “will be lining up for any TARP money or government handout anytime soon.”

Exxon wasn’t the only heavyweight reaping the benefit of a zooming energy market that had seen crude oil climb to an all-time record of $147 a barrel in July. The combined revenue for Exxon and Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX) for all of last year actually exceeded the gross domestic product (GDP) of all but 16 of the world’s nations, Bloomberg News reported.

What a difference a few months can make.

If the name of the game is corporate profits, the global economic slowdown has transformed some of the world’s biggest oil companies from leaders to laggards.

Global-energy heavyweights Exxon and Royal Dutch Shell PLC (NYSE ADR: RDS.A, RDS.B) yesterday (Thursday) became the latest players to feel the one-two punch of dwindling demand and rising supplies, reporting profit drops of 66% and 67%, respectively.

Exxon’s net income fell to $3.95 billion, or 81 cents a share, compared to $11.68 billion, or $2.22 a share, in the same quarter a year ago. The results were well below Wall Street estimates for earnings of $1.02 a share. Shell’s bottom line fell to $3.82 billion, or 62 cents a share for the second quarter, compared to $1.87 per share in the same period last year.

“Global economic conditions continue to impact the energy industry both in the volatility of commodity prices and reduced demand for products,” said Exxon Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Rex Tillerson.

With consumers and companies alike slashing costs in any way possible in an environment of spiraling unemployment and the looming possibility of inflation as a result of government stimulus efforts around the world, Exxon, Shell and other Big Oil companies are feeling the squeeze and are cutting back in almost every way possible.

“Our second quarter results were affected by the weak global economy,” Shell CEO Peter Voser when the results were released. “This weakness is creating a difficult environment both in upstream and downstream” oil production.

Shell, for instance, said it’s embarked on a cost-cutting program that will pare billions of dollars in operating expenses. In one bright spot, however, The Netherlands-based oil giant did say that it had increased its second-quarter dividend 5% to 42 cents a share, and Chief Financial Officer Simon Henry said Shell will be able to keep raising the dividend to keep pace with inflation.

Exxon’s shares fell about 1% yesterday to close at $70.72 each. They’re down about 14% from their 12-month high of $84.76. Royal Dutch Shell’s “A” shares edged up 0.13% to close at $52.53; they’re down 29% from their 52-week high of $73.97.

“There’s a lack of follow-through on production” at Exxon, Macquarie Research analyst Jason Gammel told Barron’s in an interview. “The Street rewards companies that grow production, not those who are flat.”

Exxon’s combined oil and gas production dropped 3% in the quarter, and the company blamed the year-over-year decline on restrictions imposed by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). Shell’s production suffered more, falling 5.3%, placing part of the blame on a politically unstable Nigeria.

The heft that gave Big Oil companies the huge advantage of global scale last year is now working against them; with their large size, and against the backdrop of a global economic downturn, finding new revenue to bump up profits – and, ultimately, their share prices – will be a major challenge, analysts say.

“I think it’s generally going to be difficult for the Big Oils to move the needle,” Howard Weil analyst Doug Leggate told Bloomberg News. “Those companies that can move the needle in terms of adding value through exploration or other methods of improving their portfolios, they’re the ones who are going to win out.”

Profit at Exxon’s production and exploration unit fell to $3.81 billion in the second quarter, down $6.2 billion compared with a year earlier. In its refining business, its profit fell to $512 million, down $1.05 billion from a year ago. Profit in the same category at Shell dropped 77%, to $1.33 billion, from $5.9 billion a year ago, mostly on lower oil prices.

The grim oil earnings news yesterday followed Wednesday’s report from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) that U.S. crude stocks rose by 5.1 million barrels to 347.8 million barrels for the week ended July 24. Estimates by market research firm Platts were calling for a gain of just 1.1 million barrels, MarketWatch.com reported.

U.S. crude stocks are 29.8 million barrels above the five-year average and 52.6 million barrels above year-ago levels, according to Platts.

“The data has been bearish for most of the year, and the market may be ready to acknowledge that we are awash in crude oil and products, and demand is lower than last year despite the fact that oil and product prices are much lower,” WTRG Economics analyst James L. Williams told MarketWatch. “We will be well into the recovery from the recession before there is any appreciable increase in demand.”

As of yesterday afternoon, crude oil for September delivery was trading at $66.80, up $3.45 a barrel. But that’s down $55 a barrel from this time last year – a 45.16% decrease.

Those hoping for a rally may find that they’ve only engaged in a bit of wishful thinking, since a number of analysts say there aren’t any catalysts for higher prices in sight.

Take James Cordier, president of Liberty Trading Group, who says that the rally to prices in excess of $70 earlier this year was “well overpriced.” He expects prices to continue to fall in the weeks and months to come, Cordier said in an interview with Yahoo Inc.’s (Nasdaq: YHOO) Tech Ticker.

Cordier points to the speculative demand driven by government stimulus packages, notably the liquid commodities in China, a nation whose economy looks “a little bit like a bubble to us.”

Cordier’s firm, which trades commodity-based options, is “selling calls with both hands.”

If there’s an upside to any of this, Cordier says it will be lower gas prices, which he expects to fall 15-to-20 cents per gallon around August or September, a welcome relief for consumers.

The low demand and rising supply of oil is catching the eye of regulators worldwide, who are applying the heat to speculators who are believed to be behind the main force behind wild swings in the futures markets over the past two years.

Here in the United States, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) this week held the second of three hearings on energy trading. In the United Kingdom, the Financial Services Authority (FSA) will hold a special meeting on Aug. 5 with oil companies, banks, hedge funds and oil brokers to review regulation in the market.

“A lot of what we’ve seen in recent years has nothing to do with the underlying fundamentals of the market,” Tom Bentz, a senior energy analyst at BNP Paribas Commodity Futures Inc. (OTC ADR: BNPQY), told Bloomberg. “Something has to be done to reduce some of the speculation, no doubt about it.”

Indeed, the supply-and-demand fundamentals taught in high school and college have actually come under fire just because of how speculators have allegedly distorted the oil-price market in recent years.

This year’s volatility in the market defy the “accepted rules of economics,” French President Nicolas Sarkozy and U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown said in an opinion column published earlier this month in The Wall Street Journal.

“The surge in prices last year gravely damaged the global economy and contributed to the downturn,” the two statesmen said. “The risk now is that a new period of instability could undermine confidence just as we are pushing for recovery. Governments can no longer stand idle. Volatility damages both consumers and producers.”

Big Oil executives said it is doubtful the looming U.K.-based meeting would result in any substantial new initiatives, but added that it would discuss “whether the current arrangements [in the oil market] remain appropriate,” The Financial Times reported. “The question of position limits does not seem to have the same level of priority (in Europe) as it does in the United States,” Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB) Chief Energy Economist Adam Sieminski told the FT.

Source: Global Slowdown and Plunging Profits Have ‘Big Oil’ Companies Searching for Ways to Rebound

• Verizon Communications (NYSE: VZ) will lay off 8,000 full-time and contract workers following a 21% profit drop in its second quarter, The Wall Street Journal reported. All of the job cuts will come from Verizon’s wireline business, which was hit by 630,000 residential phone subscribers canceling their service. This was offset by a rise in its fledgling fiber-optic television and Internet service called FiOS, which saw subscriber gains of 300,000 and 303,000, respectively. For the quarter ended June 30, Verizon posted a net income of $1.48 billion, or 52 cents a share on revenue of $26.86 billion. That compares to a net income of $1.88 billion, or 66 cents a share on revenue of $24.12 billion in the same quarter last year. The company’s wireless division, which is the No. 1 carrier in the United States, saw its revenue increase 28% thanks to its acquisition of Alltel Corp.

• The bulls were out in force on Wall Street yesterday (Monday) after all three markets posted gains. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 15.27 points, or 0.2% to close at 9108.51, theStandard & Poor’s 500 climbed 2.92 points, or 0.3% to close at 982.18 and the tech-laden Nasdaq Composite Index increased 1.93, or 0.1% to 1967.89. “The bottom line is that there are signs of life, and the market doesn’t want to go down. Buying late in the day and closing near the high of the day is more proof that the bulls are in control,” Ryan Detrick, senior technical strategist at Schaeffer’s Investment Research told TheStreet.com.

• The Securities and Exchange Commission made permanent a temporary rule that seeks to limit “naked shorting” by requiring broker dealers to promptly purchase or borrow securities that they would use to deliver on a short sale, MarketWatch.com reported. “Until the SEC actually toughens its rules so that abusive short selling can be stopped effectively with enforceable standards, I am concerned that the abuses that took place last year that hastened the demise of Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns could happen again,” said Sen. Ted Kaufman, D-Del. “Instead of proposing action today to deal with the problem, the SEC apparently is content to let potential solutions sit on the shelf for another two months,” he added.

• New single-family home sales rose 11% in June over the previous month to a seasonally adjusted rate of 384,000, the Commerce Department said yesterday (Monday). Still, year-over-year sales were down 21.3%. The Midwest saw 43% growth in the category, the sharpest increase in the category. Sales in the west were also strong, up 23%.

• Crude oil for September delivery rose 94 cents yesterday (Monday) to $68.99 a barrel in after-hours trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), thanks to expectations thatgains in Asian equity markets will spur fuel demand, Bloomberg News reported. The rise was also spurred by investors seeking commodities as a hedge against inflation, as the dollar traded near a seven-week low against the euro. “Investors see the equity markets as a good lead for what you can expect oil demand to be going forward,” Ben Westmore, an energy and minerals economist at National Australia Bank Ltd. told Bloomberg. “At times when you’ve got high inflation expectations, investors tend to move toward real assets such as commodities.”

• Thirty-four percent of corporate chief information officers plan on upgrading their companies to Microsoft Corp.’s (NYSE: MSFT) Windows 7, and 75% also plan on refreshing their hardware investments according to MarketWatch.com, citing a Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB) survey. The investment bank says the Oct. 22 release of its new operating system “could trigger significant new investment across the technology value chain.”

• A strong value proposition can’t stop the video game industry from suffering the wrath of the worst recession in more than 60 years.Software sales fell 29% from a year earlier, while console sales dropped 38%, The Wall Street Journal reported, citing data from market research firm The NPD Group Inc. The decline of the industry, which until the market’s March lows was thought of as recession-proof, has ripped to retailers such as Amazon.com Inc. (Nasdaq: AMZN), which blamed its weak quarterly results from its media business on falling game sales.

Source: Investment News Briefs Tuesday, July 28, 2009

• Senate Democratic leaders late yesterday (Thursday) abandoned plans for an overhaul of the nation’s $2.4 trillion healthcare system before Congress recesses in August – dealing U.S. President Barack Obama a major political blow. The decision was delivered by U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., who said that “it’s better to have a product based on quality and thoughtfulness rather than try to jam something through.” The decision to reject President Obama’s ambitious timetable – he wanted a vote on the plan before Congress adjourned – had been anticipated for weeks. Sen. Reid’s comments mirrored those of Republicans, who feared the implications of a quick vote on such a politically charged issue.

• Sagging worldwide PC and server sales resulted in a 17% revenue decline and a 29% drop in Microsoft Corp.’s (Nasdaq: MSFT)fourth quarter ended June 30. The company reported a net income of $3.05 billion, or 34 cents per share on revenue of $13.1 billion, compared to a net income of $4.29 billion, or 46 cents per share on revenue of $15.83 in the same quarter last year. For the year, the software giant posted a net income of $14.56 billion, or $1.63 a share on revenue of $58.43 billion, compared to a net income of $17.68 billion, or $1.90 per share on revenue of $60.42 billion in the same quarter last year.

• Initial unemployment benefit claims in the United States grew by 30,000 to 554,000 for the week ended July 18, according to the Department of Labor. However, the less volatile four-week moving average shrank, falling by 19,000 to 566,000. “The numbers have come down but they still have a ways to go down before the bleeding of jobs is over,” said Andrew Gretzinger, a senior economist at MFC Global Investment Management in a Bloomberg News interview. “The labor market is still weak and is going to remain that for some time to come.”

• Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB) has raised its target for Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL) from $150 to $225 following its strong second quarter showing and impressive iPhone sales. Apple moved 5.2 million units of its lucrative iPhone, exceeding Deutsche’s projection of 5 million. Deutsche estimates iPhone margins to be roughly 60%. Another reason for Deutsche’s optimism regarding Apple is it expects the iPhone’s international reach to expand from 18 to 80 countries by the end of the September quarter, with a possible partnership with China Unicom Limited (NYSE ADR:CHU) as early as this fall, representing the iPhone’s debut in the emerging market.

• Existing home sales in June rose by 3.6% to a 4.89 million annual rate from a revised 4.72 million in May, when the number rose by 2.4% according to the National Association of Realtors. “Housing may no longer be the weakest link,” said Joel Naroff, president and chief economist at Naroff Economic Advisors Inc. “Demand has clawed itself back to where it was a year ago, a very nice signal that the market has not only hit bottom but is making its way back.” In another sign the housing market may be on the upswing, rates on fixed-rate mortgages increased this week to 5.20%, up from 5.14% last week, Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE) Vice President and Chief Economist Frank Nothaft said in a prepared statement.

• Increasing landline cancellations and heavy iPhone subsidies contributed to a 15% drop in profit for AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T). The company reported a net income of $3.2 billion, or 54 cents a share on revenue of $30.73 billion for the quarter ended June 30. That compares to a net income of $3.8 billion, or 64 cents a share on revenue of $30.86 in the same quarter last year. The company did benefit from the new iPhone model released last month, activating 2.4 million accounts for the smartphone in the United States.

• Rising customer traffic and operating income could not helpMcDonald’s Corp.’s (NYSE: MCD) profit, which fell 8.1% in the second quarter due to currency fluctuations, the company said. The fast-food chain posted a net income of $1.09 billion, or 98 cents a share on revenue of $5.65 billion for the quarter ended June 30. That compares to a net income of $1.19 billion, or $1.04 a share on revenue of $6.08 billion in the same period last year.

• 3M Co. (NYSE: MMM) suffered an 18% drop in its profit, but beat expectations due to stronger demand for electronic healthcare products in its second quarter ended June 30.  The conglomerate posted a profit of $783 million, or $1.12 a share on revenue of $5.7 billion, compared to a net income of $945 million, or $1.33 a share on revenue of $6.7 billion in the same quarter last year.

Source: Investment News Briefs Friday, July 24, 2009

Stock investors will key next on earnings from tech giant Intel Corp.(Nasdaq: INTC) and banks including J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) for hints of what to expect in the third quarter — and how badly the recession hurt businesses in the second quarter.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and Dow Jones Industrial Average delayed declined for the fourth straight week last week – the longest string of losses since stocks hit their low point in March – and investors are looking at the tech sector to squelch the ongoing decline. The Nasdaq Composite Index complost 2.47% in the week ended Friday.

Earnings reports this week from computer-chip giant Intel and several big banks – including JPMorgan Chase & Co. - could provide investors and economists some insights on where the U.S. economy appears to be headed. Earnings are expected to improve over the last quarter, even though they’ll still be down substantially on a year-over-year basis, Binky Chadha, chief U.S. equity strategist at Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB), told MarketWatch.com,

“A necessary condition for the markets to go up from here is that earnings have to deliver, and we need a dissipation of the uncertainty about earnings,” Chadha said.

Year-over-year (annual) earnings comparisons are typically the financial yardstick that analysts use to assess whether the U.S. economy is growing or declining, meaning that “sequential” (quarter-to-quarter) earnings aren’t as crucial. This time around, however, the quarterly numbers may be viewed as important because they might give a better picture of the economy’s health.

During periods of extreme uncertainty, earnings estimates for companies tend to be widely dispersed – a function of investors not really knowing what to expect. That’s particularly true right now of banks and financial-services companies – and companies that derive most of their income from discretionary consumer spending.

And that makes sense, given that those are the two most uncertain portions of the U.S. economy – thanks to the ongoing global financial crisis and a jobless recovery that is badly crimping consumer confidence.

After mounting one of the strongest surges in history from their March lows, U.S. stocks have fallen back in recent weeks as investors dealt with a growing realization that the U.S. economy – and its counterparts abroad – won’t rebound with the speed or strength that had been widely expected. Further evidence of this came on July 2, when a U.S. payrolls report said the economy had lost more jobs than had been expected.

Against that backdrop, analysts and other investors are looking to the U.S. high-tech sector to pull the economy out its doldrums, Money Morning recently reported as part of its mid-year forecast series.

Thomson Reuters predicted that S&P 500 earnings will decline by 36% from last year’s levels, with financials (-53%) leading the way and techs (-24%) performing better than other sectors.  This should represent the eighth-straight quarterly decline, though analysts seem more concerned about the ensuing management comments on future operations, since that will shed some light on where the economy is headed.

When Intel reports tomorrow (Tuesday) analysts expect to see that /quotes/comstock/15*!intc/quotes/nls/intcsecond-quarter sales and earnings plunged, but some analysts believe demand may be returning to the battered market following a sharp slowdown in demand for high-tech goods. Internet-search juggernaut Google Inc. (Nasdaq: GOOG) will report on Thursday.

Other firms that report this week include Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS), Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC) and Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C). JPMorgan reports Wednesday.

“The market is filled with folks who want to be optimistic, but simply cannot find enough genuine reasons to buy into the market,” Mike Gambale, an analyst at Informa Global Markets, told journalists. “We don’t expect impressive numbers across the board, but there will be some surprises, as there always are.”

[If you're new to the commodities-investing arena, and are uncertain about the landscape - or even if you're an "old hand" at natural-resource stocks, but want some insights into the new profit plays and new players - consider hiring a guide: Money Morning Contributing Editor Peter Krauth, a recognized expert in metals, mining and energy stocks, is also the editor of the Global Resource Alert trading service, which ferrets out companies poised to profit from the so-called "Secular Bull Market" in commodities. A former portfolio advisor, Krauth continues to work out of resource-rich Canada, which keeps him close to most of the companies he researches. Against the growing global financial malaise, Krauth says that commodities are among the most-profitable and least-risky investments available, and notes that this may well be the most powerful bull market for commodities we'll see in our lifetime. He makes a strong case. To read more about his strategies, and the sector plays he likes the most, Please click here. ] 

Market Matters

“New and improved” was the market mantra of the week. General Motors Corp. (OTC: GMGMQ) emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection after just over a month, eager to start anew as a “new and improved” automaker.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) set its sights on “new and improved” trading regulations to limit excessive speculation within the energy and other commodities markets.  Some politicos are calling for a “new and improved” stimulus package to move the economy beyond the worst recession since the Great Depression.  A “new and improved” Public-Private Investment Program (PPIP) was scaled back dramatically as selected managers will begin purchasing toxic assets from ailing banks.  Unfortunately, as the week progressed, investors did not seem too keen on these “new and improved” developments.

Despite harsh protests by consumer groups and creditors, new GM reopened for business, “leaner and meaner” than ever.  A judge’s ruling allowed the once-bankrupt company to sell its performing assets to a new government-controlled entity (thanks to a $50 billion “investment” by taxpayers).

The government then shifted its attention to the regulatory world and announced plans to propose trading restrictions on certain commodities and increase the oversight over risky derivative products that have proven so detrimental to the financial markets.

The widely anticipated earnings season got started as Alcoa Inc. (NYSE: AA) reported another quarterly loss (with better-than-expected numbers) and oil giant Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX) warned that its results would be hindered by poor refinery operations and a weak dollar.

Investors have taken a more cautious approach heading into the new (but not improved) earnings season, particularly after last week’s pessimistic labor data.

Stocks fell throughout the week and fixed income again became beneficiary of safe-haven trades.  The tech-heavy Nasdaq now remains the only major domestic stock index “in the black” for the year.

Fickle energy traders suddenly turned bearish, as well, as the weak economic data implied that oil demand would be curtailed for the foreseeable future (or, at least, until 2013 according to Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries’ “2009 World Oil Outlook”).  Crude oil plunged beneath $59, or more than 10% during the week, on ongoing economic concerns,  although consumers ultimately may be recipients of cheaper gas prices.

Economically Speaking

Talk of a second stimulus surfaced this week, with several leaders – including U.S. Vice President Joe Biden and investing icon Warren Buffett – stating that the Obama administration’s $787 billion stimulus isn’t enough to jumpstart the U.S. economy.

On the other hand, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., believes the plan needs more time to work through the system as only 10% or so has even been distributed thus far.  Economists seem to agree with “Hank,” as the latest Wall Street Journal survey reported that over 80% of respondents feel that the country does not need a new round of stimulus in the current environment.  Still, the “Oracle of Omaha” painted an optimistic picture of the future by stating that the United States is “going  to come out of this better than ever, the best days of America lie ahead but not next week or next month.”

On the global front, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) revised – upward – its forecast of economic growth for 2010 and confirmed its belief that the developing economies in China and India will greatly contribute to the global rebound.

The May trade balance highlighted a slow week of data as the deficit declined to its lowest level since late 1999 and the weak labor market helped reduce consumer demand for foreign goods.

While initial claims for unemployment benefits fell to levels not seen since the beginning of the year, continuous claims (those folks who remain on the unemployment rolls for over a week) rose by another record amount.

In other words, no matter how one dissects the numbers, the labor picture looks dire and may not begin to improve for some time.  As such, the latest University of Michigan consumer sentiment reading dropped for the first time since February, another sign that the optimism of the past few months may be fading fast.

Weekly Economic Calendar

Source: Investors Looking to Tech to Pull U.S. Stocks – and the Economy – Out of Their Doldrums

While the long-term outlook for oil prices remains bullish, don’t be surprised to see a near-term correction. After tumbling to a low of $33.98 a barrel on Feb. 12, crude oil more than doubled in price, soaring to $69.82 on the New York Mercantile Exchange (Nasdaq: CME) – before tumbling nearly 4% on Thursday on a worse-than-expected jobs report.

Indeed, Money Morning predicted precisely that kind of a run-up for crude oil, first in January and then again on April 16.

As a basis for those previous analyses of the oil market, we cited the declining value of the U.S. dollar, falling production, and the possibility that demand for oil would soar as the global economy emerges from the worst financial crisis since World War II. And those factors continue to suggest that the price of oil will rise over the long-term.

However, while we still believe the long-term outlook for oil prices is bullish, it’s important to note that the recent oil price rally is not supported by supply/demand fundamentals. It is the result of a shift in market sentiment and a corresponding reversal in U.S. stocks, not a material change in the global economy.

And because the five-month rally has proceeded at an exceptionally quick pace, it’s made prices more volatile. That means prices could experience a significant correction in the short-term.

So here’s what you need to know as we approach a major inflection point for one of the world’s most volatile commodities.

What to Make of Oil’s Recent Rally

Prior to Thursday’s stumble, oil prices had soared about 106% since sliding below $34 a barrel in February. The main reason for this jump has been the so-called “green shoots” of economic recovery led investors to believe oil was oversold and that the global economy will return to growth much sooner than originally predicted.

This is highlighted by the fact that the U.S. stock market has experienced an almost simultaneous recovery. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is up about 5% from February, and 30% from mid-March. Meanwhile, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index has climbed about 11% since Feb. 12 and is up more than 30% from its March lows.

“Historically, equities have been a leading indicator of economic growth and commodities have been a coincident indicator,” Hussein Allidina, head of commodities research at Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS), toldCNNMoney.com. “Right now, you’re seeing commodities and equities move up together as money comes back in at the same time.”

However, there are other factors at work, including the declining value of the U.S. dollar and a shift in the futures market.

Because oil is priced in dollars, any decline in value of the U.S. currency drives crude oil prices higher.   During last year’s huge run-up in oil prices, the U.S. dollar fell to a record low of $1.59 against the euro, though it subsequently rebounded. Since oil began its current rally on Feb. 12, the dollar has fallen about 10%, declining to about $1.40 against the euro.

Additionally, many speculators reversed their positions on oil from short to long, and that can also pull prices higher.

“Prospects for equity markets and the global economy, backed up by exchange rate fluctuations, expectations about future oil market tightness, and, by inference, a shift of money into or out of futures markets can all influence short-term prices,” the International Energy Agency (IEA) said in its June Oil Market Report. “Indeed, it is tempting to conclude that the shift in [New York Mercantile Exchange] WTI noncommercial positions from a net 11,000 short in early May to 40,000 net long a month later is sufficient explanation for the surge in prices” of more than 20% during May and into early June.

On top of that, some $3.8 billion has flowed into oil-and-gas exchange traded funds (ETFs) this year, compared with $1.4 billion in the first half of 2008, Goran Trapp, head of global oil trading at Morgan Stanley, toldBusinessWeek.

“Considering that supply seems ample and demand is weak, the fact that oil is going up looks kind of weird,” Adam Sieminski, chief energy economist at Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB), told CNN. “But those factors are being overwhelmed by a huge sigh of relief that we’re not going to have the Great Depression. A lot of money is coming out of mattresses.”

But while investors’ perceptions of the economic recovery – and, by extension, the oil market – have changed, the underlying supply and demand fundamentals have not. There is still a glut of oil on the market and not enough demand to soak it up.
Investors seemed to undergo a min-epiphany of that reality on Thursday, when disappointing jobless numbers raised concern “about the strength and timing of a recovery,” James Williams, an economist at energy-research firm WTRG Economics, told MarketWatch.com.

August crude futures dropped $2.58 a barrel, or 3.7%, to settle at $66.73, the lowest closing level for a front-month contract since June 3,MarketWatch said.
That development supports the conclusions put forth in some recent research.

In its five-year forecast for the worldwide oil market, the IEA last week cut its five-year forecast for global crude demand and predicted that consumption won’t rebound to last year’s levels until 2012 – at the earliest.

“The deep economic recession that has spread worldwide in the past year has taken a severe toll on oil demand,” the IEA said in its Medium-Term Oil Market Report. “This marks a break after several years of strong oil demand growth.”

The IEA cut its oil demand estimates for every year through 2013 by about 3 million barrels per day (bpd). According to the agency, world oil demand would grow at an average annual rate of 0.6%, or 540,000 bpd, annually over the 2008 to 2014 period, reaching 89 million barrels a day by 2014.

Those estimates are based on the International Monetary Fund (IMF) forecast for global economic growth of about 5% a year between 2012 and 2014. In the IEA’s “lower GDP scenario,” in which the global economy expands by 3% a year, demand won’t reach 2008 levels until 2014.

With oil demand not expected to reach 2008 levels for another three years at least, the fact that oil prices are climbing more rapidly than they did in last year – when demand was high, supplies were tight, and the U.S. dollar was trading at significantly lower levels than it is today – is a red flag for many analysts.

“There may be enough momentum to carry us up to just $72.50 [a barrel], but then I think the correction is going to be just that dramatic,” Guy Gleichmann, president of the United Strategic Investors Group, told The Wall Street Journal.

Additionally, a continued rise in oil prices could threaten the economic recovery by raising production costs and hurting consumers at the pumps.

Oil prices between $30 and $40 per barrel were like an “additional stimulus package,” Fatih Birol, the IEA’s chief economist, said last month. “But now this stimulus package is losing its strength and it will be definitely a problem for the global economy if prices continue to rise.”

Prices at above $70 a barrel “may well strangle the economic recovery,” Birol said.

If that’s true, oil prices, should they continue to rise, would only be setting themselves up for a bigger tumble when the economy slips back into recession later in the year.

Still Bullish Long-Term

While the short-term outlook for oil remains murky, if not bearish, the long-term outlook for crude is still strong, thanks to the weakness of the U.S. dollar and the probability that demand will eventually return.

In fact, the IEA estimates that oil demand will strengthen in India and Saudi Arabia this year, despite a 3% decline in global consumption.

And China, which has been using low commodities prices to stock up on resources, plans to increase strategic crude oil reserves by 160% to 270 million barrels during the next five years. Citing an unidentified official from China’s National Energy Administration, Nikkei English News said that Beijing would spend $4.39 billion (30 billion yuan) on stockpiling facilities with a capacity to hold 169 million barrels of crude oil.

“The wild card is really the Chinese,” said Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald. “Don’t forget the Chinese are trying todiversify away from the dollar, and there are only two ‘non-currency currencies’ on the planet: gold and oil.”

And with the expansive monetary policy being employed by the U.S. Federal Reserve, the value of the dollar seems destined to retest the lows it reached in 2008.

The U.S. Federal Reserve has cut its benchmark lending rate to a range of 0.0% to 0.25%, and the central bank plans to purchase up to $300 billion in long-term U.S. Treasury securities and $750 billion of mortgage-backed securities as it pursues a policy of quantitative easing.

“Our forecast has been that oil will be at $100 in 2015 and it could happen faster if the economy recovers,” Deutsche Bank’s Sieminski toldCNN.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS) raised its 2009 oil price forecast to $85 a barrel from $65 and said prices would reach $95 a barrel in 2010. Other analysts agree.

J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) lifted its forecast for the average price of oil in 2009 to $55.63 a barrel from $49.38, though the investment bank noted “global demand and inventory levels look horrendous.”

“We’re concerned about oil prices rising so rapidly in the near-term,” Hussein Allidina, head of commodities research at Morgan Stanley, toldCNN. “But the bet in the long-term is one way, and that’s just up.”

Source: Oil Prices Due for a Short-Term Setback, Although Long-Term Outlook Remains Bullish

Editor’s Note: This oil preview is the latest installment of a new Money Morning series that will make economic projections for key U.S. sectors for the last half of 2009. As part of that series, look for forecasts for housing, energy, U.S. stocks and the emerging markets. ]]> http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/oil-prices-due-for-a-short-term-setback-although-long-term-outlook-remains-bullish/18735/feed 0