He is best known for his daily newsletter, The Gartman Letter, which is read with morning coffees by countless Wall Street operators. In short, Gartman is an underground investor par excellence.
Gartman recently gave an interview with Canada’s The Globe and Mail. In it, he reveals his stance on the inflation/deflation argument and how to best hedge against an inflationary outcome.

Gartman is not your typical inflation hawk. He sees deflation and inflation taking hold in the future: inflation in raw materials prices “sooner rather than later” and deflation in wages. When asked, “Will we have inflation or deflation?” his answer is “Yes.”

For those who want to hedge against inflation, however, Gartman has perhaps the best hedge combination we’ve seen thus far here at Notes. This is a remarkably simple, yet we believe effective way of preparing your portfolio for an inflationary cycle, albeit one that doesn’t affect asset classes across the board (Gartman sees health-care costs rising for instance, but not car prices or house prices).

Gartman’s formula is as follows: equities (in raw materials manufacturers or miners) + gold + TIPS.

(We told you it was remarkably simple!)

Gartman is singularly measured in his approach to investing. He is conservative in his approach and has little time for the histrionics often displayed by the talking heads on TV. (He is dismissive, for instance, of popular dollar bear Peter Schiff, who he believes is “terribly hot headed and is prone to loud, ungentlemanly screaming at debates.”) What follows are some other Gartman gems that come out of his interview with The Globe and Mail.

• The dollar will trade “to parity… and beyond” with the US dollar. That’s because Gartman sees Canada “as a country of stability; of reasonably stable financials; of a stable banking environment and as an exporter of the things the world needs.”
• Gartman is bullish on the currencies and the stock markets of Canada, Brazil and Australia relative to the US dollar and US stock market. According to Gartman, “Canada, Brazil and Australia are net exporters of ‘stuff,’ and the world will need these things: grain; energy; water; et al.”
• The trend for gold is “quietly upward.” Gartman doesn’t believe the yellow metal will reach $5,000 in his lifetime. Nor does he see gold dipping below $840 an ounce. According to Gartman, “Someone or something is leaning on gold at $980-$1000.” He says he’ll let that seller be sated before he ventures back to the long side.
• The trend for nat gas is strong, but supplies are stronger. Those who are bullish, says Gartman, will have to wait for winter as a cooler summer means demand for air conditioning is unusually low. When Gartman does go long nat gas he will invest in the nat-gas trusts to ensure a “steady stream of income.”
• Gartman is cautiously bullish on raw materials manufacturers and miners: steel; copper; zinc; grain growers; water.
• Canada’s banks are in “much better shape” than their US counterparts and they enjoy the same benefit of the positively shaped yield curve.
• The dollar will remain the world’s reserve “until the US relinquishes its position as the world’s most important military power AND as the world’s largest economy.”
• Protectionism is “lurking everywhere and it is especially problematic in election years.” This is bad news for the US dollar.

But the Fed and Treasury have engineered a strategy to pay off the debt with weaker and weaker dollars. And guess what? So far, so good. Since November 2002, the dollar has fallen against the euro more than 50 percent since its high in October 2000. Of course, this is not the first time we’ve gone through a managed devaluation of the currency. In the 34-year period since Nixon slammed the gold window shut and subsequently ended the Bretton Woods exchange rate mechanism, we’ve had only five major currency trends:

1. Weak dollar 1972–1978 (7 years)
2. Strong dollar 1979–1985 (7 years)
3. Weak dollar 1986–1995 (10 years)
4. Strong dollar 1996–2001 (6 years)
5. Weak dollar 2002– (? years)

The most notable period spanned the 10 years from 1986 through 1995. Then as now, the United States was fighting a historic current account deficit through managed debasement of its currency. But because the present bear market only began in February 2002, the current cycle looks like it still has a number of years to run.

In the best-case scenario, if the current bear market follows the trajectory set by the 1986 — 1995 slump, we could see a weakening dollar for up to 10 years. This presents an opportunity for selling the dollar in one of four ways: direct and indirect speculations, using short- and long-term options for each. These plays will help you safely position your money outside the dollar bear market. And you stand to make a fair amount of money, too.

*************************************

Using the “Off Switch” to Shut Down Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s Diseases, Too

It turns out the “off switch” discovery could have lots of uses beyond radically improving a patient’s chances of beating cancer.

For instance, take Alzheimer’s. Right now, there’s no cure.

But imagine the implications — for both victims and medical investors — if this same breakthrough could be used to reverse Alzheimer’s symptoms in just weeks.

Check it out here…

*************************************

But there is great danger ahead. Since the trade deficit passed the $759 billion mark — 6.3 percent of GDP — foreigners now must shell out about $1.5 billion a day just to keep the dollar afloat. And even during the managed dollar decline of 2003, the trade imbalance continued to grow. In 2005, Stephen Roach, Morgan Stanley’s chief global strategist, predicted that the current account deficit at the time was on course to reach $710 billion — 6.5 percent of GDP. He was short by only a few billion.

Herein lies the drama. The Bank of Japan spent the equivalent of $187 billion in 2003 — and $67 billion in January 2004 alone — in a bid to prevent its strengthening currency from choking off the country’s export-led recovery. In dollar terms, the Bank of Japan is now spending more than $1.5 billion every day trying to keep the yen from strengthening against the greenback.

Over a four-week period in the fall of 2003, combined foreign central bank purchases of U.S. securities topped $40 billion, more than $2 billion every trading day. Yet these central bank billions managed merely to limit the greenback’s decline to just 2.3 percent over the same period. Can you imagine what would have happened if the banks hadn’t pumped that money into the Fed’s reserves? One former currency trader has asked, “If $40 billion cannot bring about even a minor rally, just how weak and despised is the once — almighty dollar?”

We have relied on the kindness of strangers for too long. “We’re like the untrustworthy brother-in-law who keeps borrowing money, promising to pay it back, but can never seem to get out of debt,” Jim Rogers writes. “Eventually, people cut that guy off.”

There is no way the United States can possibly pay off its creditors should they decide to cash in their IOUs. Right now, the United States holds only about $70 billion in reserves against its obligations — much less than 2005’s $87 billion. That would last about three minutes should creditors begin to sell the dollar, rather than trying to support it.

It’s hard to imagine, isn’t it? The world’s reserve currency spiraling downward, out of control. But then, that’s what the British must have thought in 1992 when they attempted to manage a devaluation of the pound. Despite the Bank of England’s best efforts, sterling got away from them; the currency collapsed and Britain was kicked out of the Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) established to pave the way for the euro. On that day, known as Black Wednesday in Britain, currency speculator George Soros is rumored to have made as much as $2 billion. Don’t be surprised if more fortunes emerge in the future as the dollar slips dangerously close to free fall.

By flooding the system with liquidity, the Fed cannot control the value of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies; nor can they control its purchasing power — at least not indefinitely. The Fed’s current policies can “give the majority of investors the illusion of wealth as asset markets appreciate,” wrote Marc Faber in November 2003, “while the loss of the currency’s purchasing power is hardly noticed. This is particularly true of a society that has a very large domestic market, where 90 percent of the people don’t have a passport and therefore know little about what is going on outside their own continent. And where the import prices of manufactured goods are in continuous decline because of the entry of China, as a huge new supplier of products with an extremely low cost structure, into the global market economy.” If that’s the case, you should look at any declines in the dollar as an opportunity to make some money.

The dollar is the single biggest element of risk in the world of finance today. Rearrange the current system of world finance ever so slightly, let confidence in the greenback falter, and the mighty dollar could go up in flames. There are many ways to hedge against this risk. Better still, there are many ways to profit from the likelihood the dollar will fall. Some methods are direct, some indirect. Some are leveraged, some unleveraged. There is a methodology for every taste, but before explaining the specifics, we ask: What ails the dollar?

The dollar is a victim of its own success. It is America’s most successful export ever — more successful than chewing gum, Levi’s, Coca-Cola, or even Elvis Presley, Britney Spears, and Madonna put together. Trillions of dollars flow through the global financial markets every week, and they are readily accepted at large and small — and clandestine — business establishments from Kiev to Karachi.

Today, there are simply too many dollars in circulation for the currency’s own good. Why? Americans have been living beyond their means for more than two decades. The U.S. dollar’s problems stem from a single cause. “If there’s a bubble,” wrote David Rosenberg, chief economist at Merrill Lynch,” it’s in this four-letter word: debt. The U.S. economy is just awash in it.”

You’ve seen it firsthand: John Q. Public now holds more credit cards and outstanding loans — with a higher and higher total debt load — than ever before. Outstanding consumer credit, including mortgage and other debt, reached $9.3 trillion in April 2003 — a significant increase from its $7 trillion total in January 2000 — but by the third quarter of 2007, debt had nearly doubled since 2000, to $13.7 trillion. With consumer spending alone responsible for approximately 70 percent of U.S. GDP, that’s quite a hefty personal debt load.

The corporate debt picture is no better. American companies have never depended so much on sales of their corporate bonds. Between 2002-2007, investment-grade corporate bond sales increased nearly 60 percent, growing from $598 billion to $951 billion. But junk bond sales for that same period broke the bank, surging from $57 billion to $133 billion.

The third leg of the debt problem, following consumer and business debt, is Uncle Sam. Government debt as of November 7, 2007, officially passed $9,000,000,000,000. That’s about $30,000 for every man, woman, and child in the country. This total includes debt owned by many types of investors, from individuals to corporations to Federal Reserve banks and especially to foreign interests. (By 2004, foreign central banks had stockpiled more than $1.3 trillion worth of dollar-denominated Treasury bonds and agency bonds at the Federal Reserve. By 2007, foreign debt had nearly doubled, to $2.033 trillion.)

What the $7.8 trillion figure does not account for are items like the gap between the government’s Social Security and Medicare commitments and the money put aside to pay for them. If these items are factored in, the government debt burden for every American rises to well over $175,000. In 2005, the Methuselah of investment mavens, Sir John Templeton, then 93, said you should get out of U.S. stocks, the U.S. dollar, and excess residential real estate. Templeton believed the dollar would fall 40 percent against other major currencies, and that this would lead the nation’s major creditors — notably Japan and China — to dump their U.S. bonds, which would cause interest rates to run up, thus beginning a long period of stagflation. He was right.

*****************************************

The Slow-Motion “Black Monday” Ahead

Here’s a picture for you: If the market today falls as fast and as far as it did in 1987, you’ll see more than 3,000 points erased from the Dow alone. In a single day.

Could it happen?

Banks hold the same blue chip shares you’ll find parked in your retirement fund. When the “level three” losses get declared, those same banks might have to start dumping those shares to raise cash. And that could send these blue chips…along with most of the rest of the stock market…into full-scale collapse.

I urge you to take the seven steps outlined for you in your free Strategic Financial Survival Library. Click here to reserve yours…

*****************************************

Don’t let his age fool you — Templeton was still sharp in 1999 when the financial industry hacks in Florida were urging their customers to buy more tech stocks. Templeton warned that the bubble would soon burst. He was right; they were wrong. Of course, he was only 87 back then. He is almost certainly right again. Other great investors, too, are getting out of the dollar. For the first time in his life, Warren Buffett is investing in foreign currencies.

George Soros, who made a fortune selling sterling in the 1992 ERM crisis, warns that the U.S. system could “blow up” at any time. Richard Russell, the influential editor of the Dow Theory letters, speaking at the New Orleans Investment Conference, warned: “If ever there was a crisis that could shake the global economy — this is it.” Jim Rogers is teaching his daughter to speak Chinese. When old-timers nod their heads in agreement — especially when they happen to be the most successful investors in the world — their advice may be worth listening to.

American consumers, companies, the U.S. government, and the country as a whole owe more dollars to more people than ever before. But perhaps the greatest threat to the U.S. economy is its foreign creditors. There is — or should be — a limit to the number of dollars foreigners are willing to buy and hold and thus a limit to their willingness to service our credit habit. Why? Because the United States, while still the world’s number — one economic power, is showing itself to be an unreliable steward of its own currency.

Regards,
Addison Wiggin

Source: How to Sell the Dollar

It is widely regarded that such utterances, if repeated often enough, can constitute the sum total of what is still laughingly known as the nation’s “strong dollar policy.”

Over the past two generations, the American government has launched many failed campaigns. There has been the war on drugs, the war on poverty, and the continued attempts to improve education. But the “strong dollar policy” must be seen as the poster child for all failed Federal policies.

Many in the market took cheer that the policy is now being greatly expanded. In an unprecedented move, the Fed Chairman is now adding his voice to the chorus and using the same rhetoric previously used by Treasury alone. That’s two people saying the words…not just one:

A double-barrel strong dollar policy!

As the administration is so fond of saying, a nation’s currency reflects the underlying strength of its economy. In that sense it can be seen as a nation’s economic report card. In truth, a strong currency is in the interest of every nation, just as good grades are in the interest of every student.

___________________________________________________________
URGENT WARNING: American Debt Crisis Set to Implode

Ben Bernanke is just DAYS away from unwinding the world’s biggest gamble – and his actions could spin markets into a “deflationary, global collapse.” To learn his dirty little secret – and grab potential gains of 319% or MORE, read Money Trader Jack Crooks’ latest report.
___________________________________________________________

A flunking student cannot improve his grades by simply telling his parents and teachers that he has adopted a “straight A policy.” If his words are not accompanied by a change in actual behavior, his new policy is unlikely to achieve results. As long as his bad habits persist, the policy will not be any more effective simply because one of his friends chimes in.

In his speech this past Tuesday, Ben Bernanke finally admitted that the weakness in the dollar was contributing to both higher inflation and elevated inflation expectations. This stands in stark contrast to his recent testimony in front of the House Banking Committee, where in response to a question asked by Congressman Ron Paul, he confidently declared that the weakness of the dollar only effected Americans who travel abroad. It is amazing how little attention this complete reversal received.

The media of course wasted no time in declaring that Bernanke’s speech heralded the opening of a new front in the campaign against the falling dollar. For example, CNBC’s Larry Kudlow proclaimed that Bernanke had endorsed “King Dollar” (someone needs to remind Kudlow that the king has long since abdicated his throne) and the network ran an entire segment on how to profit from the new dollar rally. All of this because Bernanke merely mentioned the dollar, acknowledged its effects on inflation, and expressed concern for its plight. As far as the media and Wall Street are concerned, words without action are enough. Too bad that’s not the way things work here on the planet Earth.

The real take away from Bernanke’s comment is not that the dollar is about to rally, but that it is now more likely to sink even lower. I believe the main reason Bernanke has refrained from mentioning the dollar in the past is that he did not want to be put in a position of actually having to do something about its decline. He is now so fearful of an imminent dollar collapse that he must have felt compelled to throw down the gauntlet despite his fear that someone might actually pick it up.

My guess is that currency traders will ultimately see this as an act of desperation. When the dollar keeps falling a chorus will swell to demand that the Fed put teeth in its new policy. If Bernanke does nothing the world will finally see a naked emperor and the dollar’s decline will turn into a rout. If, on the other hand, the Fed raises rates to defend the dollar, and only a short term bounce results, then all remaining confidence in the Fed’s ability to support the dollar will evaporate as well. This is probably Bernanke’s greatest fear and is likely the main reason he waited so long before mentioning the dollar. The fact that he felt compelled to do so now likely means he knows the game is coming to an end.

Source: Dollar Bear Torpedoes the Fed’s ‘Strong Dollar Policy’

At the time, our debt stood at $7 trillion, with interest payments in fiscal 2003 totaling $318 billion. But now the U.S. national debt stands above $ 9 trillion, with interest payments in fiscal 2007 adding $ 1.4 billion a day.

But the Fed and Treasury have engineered a strategy to pay off the debt with weaker and weaker dollars. And guess what? So far, so good. Since November 2002, the dollar has fallen against the euro more than 50 percent since its high in October 2000. Of course, this is not the first time we’ve gone through a managed devaluation of the currency. In the 34 – year period since Nixon slammed the gold window shut and subsequently ended the Bretton Woods exchange rate mechanism, we’ve had only five major currency trends:

1. Weak dollar 1972 – 1978 (7 years)
2. Strong dollar 1979 – 1985 (7 years)
3. Weak dollar 1986 – 1995 (10 years)
4. Strong dollar 1996 – 2001 (6 years)
5. Weak dollar 2002 – (? years)

The most notable period spanned the 10 years from 1986 through 1995. Then as now, the United States was fighting a historic current account deficit through managed debasement of its currency. But because the present bear market only began in February of 2002, the current cycle looks like it still has a number of years to run.

In the best-case scenario, if the current bear market follows the trajectory set by the 1986 – 1995 slump, we could see a weakening dollar for up to 10 years. This presents an opportunity for selling the dollar in one of four ways: direct and indirect speculations, using short- and long-term options for each. These plays will help you safely position your money outside the dollar bear market. And you stand to make a fair amount of money, too.

But there is great danger ahead. Since the trade deficit passed the $ 759 billion mark – 6.3 percent of GDP – foreigners now must shell out about $ 1.5 billion a day just to keep the dollar afloat. And even during the managed dollar decline of 2003, the trade imbalance continued to grow. In 2005, Stephen Roach, Morgan Stanley’s chief global strategist, predicted that the current account deficit at the time was on course to reach $ 710 billion – 6.5 percent of GDP. He was short by only a few billion.

Herein lies the drama. The Bank of Japan spent the equivalent of $187 billion in 2003 – and $67 billion in January 2004 alone – in a bid to prevent its strengthening currency from choking off the country’s export-led recovery. In dollar terms, the Bank of Japan is now spending more than $ 1.5 billion every day trying to keep the yen from strengthening against the greenback.

Over a four-week period in the fall of 2003, combined foreign central bank purchases of U.S. securities topped $ 40 billion, more than $ 2 billion every trading day. Yet these central bank billions managed merely to limit the greenback’s decline to just 2.3 percent over the same period. Can you imagine what would have happened if the banks hadn’t pumped that money into the Fed’s reserves? One former currency trader has asked, “If $40 billion cannot bring about even a minor rally, just how weak and despised is the once – almighty dollar?”

We have relied on the kindness of strangers for too long. “We’re like the untrustworthy brother – in – law who keeps borrowing money, promising to pay it back, but can never seem to get out of debt,” Jim Rogers writes. “Eventually, people cut that guy off.”

There is no way the United States can possibly pay off its creditors should they decide to cash in their IOUs. Right now, the United States holds only about $ 70 billion in reserves against its obligations – much less than 2005’s $ 87 billion. That would last about three minutes should creditors begin to sell the dollar, rather than trying to support it.

It’s hard to imagine, isn’t it? The world’s reserve currency spiraling downward, out of control. But then, that’s what the British must have thought in 1992 when they attempted to manage a devaluation of the pound. Despite the Bank of England’s best efforts, sterling got away from them; the currency collapsed and Britain was kicked out of the Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) established to pave the way for the euro. On that day, known as Black Wednesday in Britain, currency speculator George Soros is rumored to have made as much as $ 2 billion. Don’t be surprised if more fortunes emerge in the future as the dollar slips dangerously close to free fall.

By flooding the system with liquidity, the Fed cannot control the value of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies; nor can they control its purchasing power – at least not indefinitely. The Fed’s current policies can “give the majority of investors the illusion of wealth as asset markets appreciate, ” wrote Marc Faber in November 2003, “while the loss of the currency’s purchasing power is hardly noticed. This is particularly true of a society that has a very large domestic market, where 90 percent of the people don’t have a passport and therefore know little about what is going on outside their own continent. And where the import prices of manufactured goods are in continuous decline because of the entry of China, as a huge new supplier of products with an extremely low cost structure, into the global market economy.” If that’s the case, you should look at any declines in the dollar as an opportunity to make some money.

The dollar is the single biggest element of risk in the world of finance today. Rearrange the current system of world finance ever so slightly, let confidence in the greenback falter, and the mighty dollar could go up in flames. There are many ways to hedge against this risk. Better still, there are many ways to profit from the likelihood the dollar will fall. Some methods are direct, some indirect. Some are leveraged, some unleveraged. There is a methodology for every taste, but before explaining the specifics, we ask: What ails the dollar?

The dollar is a victim of its own success. It is America’s most successful export ever – more successful than chewing gum, Levi’s, Coca – Cola, or even Elvis Presley, Britney Spears, and Madonna put together. Trillions of dollars flow through the global financial markets every week, and they are readily accepted at large and small – and clandestine – business establishments from Kiev to Karachi.

Today, there are simply too many dollars in circulation for the currency’s own good. Why? Americans have been living beyond their means for more than two decades. The U.S. dollar’s problems stem from a single cause. “If there’s a bubble,” wrote David Rosenberg, chief economist at Merrill Lynch, ” it’s in this four – letter word: debt. The U.S. economy is just awash in it. “

You’ve seen it firsthand: John Q. Public now holds more credit cards and outstanding loans – with a higher and higher total debt load – than ever before. Outstanding consumer credit, including mortgage and other debt, reached $ 9.3 trillion in April 2003 – a significant increase from its $ 7 trillion total in January 2000 – but by the third quarter of 2007, debt had nearly doubled since 2000, to $ 13.7 trillion. With consumer spending alone responsible for approximately 70 percent of U.S. GDP, that’s quite a hefty personal debt load.

The corporate debt picture is no better. American companies have never depended so much on sales of their corporate bonds. Between 2002-2007, investment – grade corporate bond sales increased nearly 60 percent, growing from $598 billion to $951 billion. But junk bond sales for that same period broke the bank, surging from $57 billion to $133 billion.

The third leg of the debt problem, following consumer and business debt, is Uncle Sam. Government debt as of November 7, 2007, officially passed $ 9,000,000,000,000. That’s about $ 30,000 for every man, woman, and child in the country. This total includes debt owned by many types of investors, from individuals to corporations to Federal Reserve banks and especially to foreign interests. (By 2004, foreign central banks had stockpiled more than $ 1.3 trillion worth of dollar – denominated Treasury bonds and agency bonds at the Federal Reserve. By 2007, foreign debt had nearly doubled, to $ 2.033 trillion.)