Your family’s share of the government debt is now over half a million dollars. A record $546,668, to be exact.

That cheery Monday stat comes courtesy of a USA Today study, which claims that each American family’s share rose 12% in 2008. That’s $55,000 in new government debt last year for every U.S. household — thousands more than the median household annual income. Here’s how it breaks down:

Last year’s spike is the biggest since the Medicare prescription drug benefit was added in 2003. According to the rag, the government garnered $6.8 trillion in “new obligations” in 2008, bringing the total U.S. tab to $63.8 trillion. Given our spending record so far in 2009, it’s safe to say your family’s burden is already much, much larger.

And you ain’t seen nothin’ yet… the Social Security program will grow by 1-2 million beneficiaries every year until 2032 as baby boomers retire. Medicare will add just as many each year starting in 2011, when that same demographic starts turning 65.
Unless the U.S. becomes a net saver, “another global financial crisis triggered by a dollar crisis could be inevitable,” forecast former Chinese central banker Yu Yongding over the weekend. (Oy… Beijing is 7,000 miles from Washington, and even they can see this coming.)

Yu’s comments were purposefully timed — U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner embarked on a sudden PR tour of China this weekend. His mission? Keep the cash flowing from America’s No. 1 creditor.

“No one is going to be more concerned about future deficits than we are,” said Geithner, whose government’s budget deficit will exceed $1.75 trillion this year. “As we recover from this unprecedented crisis, we will cut our fiscal deficit [and] we will eliminate the extraordinary government support that we have put in place to overcome the crisis.”

In the meantime, Geithner assured students at Peking University that China’s investments in U.S. paper are “very safe.”
“I doubt the Chinese believed him,” says the man, the myth, the legend Chuck Butler. “Of course, I’m not a Chinese official, so I don’t really know what they are thinking. But I’ve watched them smile and tell former U.S. Treasury Secretary Paulson that they were going to allow greater currency flexibility, and after he would board his plane, it would business as usual… Same thing for Graham and Schumer, who thought their prestigious status as lawmakers would get them someplace with the Chinese.

”It all comes down to the fact that the U.S. needs China more than the other way around.”
General Motors, once the backbone of U.S. manufacturing, is officially bankrupt. As you’ve no doubt heard, the company declared bankruptcy this morning. But since it’s 2009, lord knows it can’t be a run-of-the-mill insolvency. The Obama administration has its hands deep in this thing… here’s the fine print of the biggest industrial bankruptcy in U.S. history:

• Uncle Sam gets a 60% stake. The government will pump an additional $30 billion into GM (on top of the $20 billion already squandered). In exchange, the government will be the largest shareholder… leverage it will use to usher GM through bankruptcy and convert it to this “leaner, stronger company” we’ve been promised
• Half of the UAW’s $20 billion health care fund will be converted to GM stock, which will give it a 17.5% stake in the company. 12-20 factories will be closed, at the cost of approximately 21,000 union workers. 40% of the 6,000 GM dealers will have to close, too
• The Canadian government gets a 12% stake, given all GM’s design/manufacturing activity up north.
• Bondholders were bought (bullied?) out. They’ll swap their $27.1 billion in unsecured debt for 10% of GM, with warrants to own 15% more. Surely, they learned from Chrysler’s bondholders, who were publicly vilified by President Obama for demanding what was lawfully theirs… so much for that hallmark of American capitalism
• Current shareholders get nada. At least that rule of bankruptcy is still intact. If you were long GM, please consider letting someone else manage your money. Anyone.

“GM Bankruptcy to Bring Taxpayer Ownership,” headlined Bloomberg this morning. Shame on them and the U.S. government for perpetuating this “taxpayer ownership” BS.

We must have been asleep when the “taxpayer” got any say in this one. GM is owned by wealthy politicians in Washington who, under threat of imprisonment, forced their constituents to finance the deal. Insinuating the public has any control is “Orwellian in the extreme” Addison suggested when we discussed the matter late Friday. Amen.

And let’s be really honest… taxes haven’t gone up to cover the GM bailout (or any credit crisis expense), but government borrowing certainly has. If any “taxpayers” truly own GM, their tax returns get mailed to Beijing or Tokyo.
Sign of the times… GM and Citigroup are getting kicked off the Dow. Cisco and Travelers will replace them next Monday. Extra irony (and foreshadowing?) in this exchange, as Citi is the former owner of Travelers, which it spun off in 2002.
The market baked in GM’s insolvency a long time ago. In fact, the Dow’s off to the races this morning, even though one of its 30 components is rapidly approaching zero (the “beauty” of a weighted index). The big indexes rose 2% within the first 30 minutes of trading.
“We have reached a pivot point in financial markets,” forecasts Rob Parenteau, steward of the Richebacher Society.

“As we have documented in recent weeks, the list of U.S. macro series showing stable nominal levels over the past three-four months continues to increase. These include retail sales, new orders for durable goods and imports of materials and finished goods. That is not what usually happens in a debt-deflation dynamic, which cumulatively builds on itself. It appears the debt-deflation risk is being contained by extreme fiscal and monetary measures.

“Stability is better than free fall, but it is not the same as expansion, and we believe equity investors have shoved valuations high enough over the past three months that they now require signs of economic growth, not just stability, to carry equity indexes higher. We think the odds of them getting that could improve after we get past the auto production and dealer downshift later in the summer, but the rise in Treasury yields is becoming alarming.

“So from a strategic point of view, we believe equity investors want and need to see stronger economic and earnings results to drive indexes higher, while bond investors need just the opposite to calm Treasury yields down. In addition, through near-zero interest rate policy (ZIRP) and quantitative easing (QE) approaches, the Fed has been trying to push private investors into riskier asset classes while the Treasury’s debt issuance calendar implies they need private investors to prefer owning Treasury bonds, which are generally not the asset of choice in an economic recovery scenario.

“In other words, we have contradictory cross currents here. If the Fed doesn’t intervene to slow or halt the Treasury yield backup, there is a chance the stabilization in unit home sales will wither away. If the Fed does step up QE operations to halt the Treasury yield rise, professional investors taking the ‘green toilet paper’ view will continue to sell dollars and buy commodities. Down the line, that implies higher energy prices for consumers and higher input prices for manufacturers, neither of which we would consider growth-supportive developments.”

If you seek a better, richer life through macroeconomic awareness, you’ll be right at home in the Richebacher Society. Get in, here.
Like last week, materials and energy companies are leading the way today. The great global rebound argument is still hot, and this data point is keeping the commodity fire ablaze:
China’s manufacturing sector expanded for the third month in a row in May, its government reports today. China’s purchasing managers index registered a score of 53.1 during the month, down just a bit from April but still above the expansion/contraction score of 50.
Oil’s up to a fresh seven-month high of $67 a barrel today, largely due to China’s PMI number.
The dollar is still falling, giving commodities an even bigger boost. The dollar index fell right through support at 80 on Friday and has plunged another point and a half since. It’s at 78.8 as we write, just off its 2009 low.

Thus, the cost of your European vacation has popped 7% since the start of May. The euro is up 9 cents over the last 30 days, to just under $1.42 as we write. The pound has followed suit, up 11 cents over the last month, to $1.62.

And could parity be around the corner for our neighbor to the north? The Canadian dollar is up to 92 cents today, its highest level since October 2008.
Gold continues to flourish, but silver has been the real precious metal story of late. The yellow metal is up about 9% over the last month, to roughly $980 today. Silver, on the other hand, shot up 29% in May, to $15.50 an ounce.

“In general,” says Byron King, “the precious metals are up because the big-spending politicians in Washington have no respect for the U.S. dollar. Break out the black crepe and armbands of mourning for the U.S. dollar.

“Specifically, silver has always been the “poor man’s gold.” Silver tends to lurk in the shadows of the price of gold, sort of a stepchild to the yellow metal.

“But on occasion, silver undergoes a slingshot effect. Between the basic industrial demand for electronics, plus jewelry demand (’cuz gold’s getting pricey!), and now the monetary pull… silver is accelerating in a price rise that is — believe it or not — leaving gold in the dust.

“Silver could break $20 sooner than we’ll see gold at $1,200, and the silver miners (my readers own several) will soar to new heights. Do you have your ticket for this ride? All aboard!!!”

Heh, get your ticket here: Byron’s latest special report on precious metals investing.
Silver may continue to outperform gold. If you’re a believer in historic ratios, silver still has room to rise in order to meet its average gold price ratio over the last decade.

Either that, or gold’s price needs to fall. And in this environment, we’d sooner go long silver than short gold. Do you agree?
“I’m a raving fan, but sometimes you guys get misled a bit,” writes a reader in response to Robert Gordon’s call that the recession has bottomed.

“The so-called ‘ultimate indicator’ of recession ends of the four-week moving average of initial jobless claims is hardly as accurate as suggested. It is true that it does turn down typically, just as a recession ends from the retrospective declaration of that recession, but it is NOT true that every time the four-week moving average of initial jobless claims turns down during a recession, the recession ends.

“In the ’81-’82 recession, the indicator turned down from over 500k four times before a correct signal — in December ’81, February 82, May 82, June 82, and finally at the real ultimate peak in October 82. In the 1990 recession, it turned down in January of ’91, before its ultimate peak in April 1991.

“In the 2000 recession, it turned down in June 2001 from high levels, to give a false signal before peaking in October 2001, although many other recession indicators suggest that the recession went on for far longer than in the graphic you presented.

“Virtually every recession therefore has witnessed false signals of at least one and often many times before the ultimate peak in initial claims and before the later declared end of the recession. Why would this time be any different — particularly in view of the potential for auto mess to lead to accelerated claims?”

The 5: We agree… guess we didn’t lay the skepticism on thick enough when we introduced the idea. Glad to hear you’re a fan.

Source: Your Share of the Debt, GM Dies, Silver Still a Buy, A Pivot Point and More!

We’re not so sure. It seems too early to us.

But we’re not even going to think about it. Today, we’ve got to make tracks. We’re traveling.

In light of our voyage we’re turning today’s essay over to guest host Ian Mathias, of Agora Financial’s 5 Min. Forecast. He’ll take over from here…

Your family’s share of the government debt is now over half a million dollars. A record $546,668, to be exact.

That cheery Monday stat comes courtesy of a USA Today study, which claims that each American family’s share rose 12% in 2008. That’s $55,000 in new government debt last year for every US household – thousands more than the median household annual income. Here’s how it breaks down:

Last year’s spike is the biggest since the Medicare prescription drug benefit was added in 2003. According to the rag, the government garnered $6.8 trillion in “new obligations” in 2008, bringing the total US tab to $63.8 trillion. Given our spending record so far in 2009, it’s safe to say your family’s burden is already much, much larger.

And you ain’t seen nothin’ yet… the Social Security program will grow by 1-2 million beneficiaries every year until 2032 as baby boomers retire. Medicare will add just as many each year starting in 2011, when that same demographic starts turning 65.

Unless the US becomes a net saver, “another global financial crisis triggered by a dollar crisis could be inevitable,” forecast former Chinese central banker Yu Yongding over the weekend. (Oy… Beijing is 7,000 miles from Washington, and even they can see this coming.)

Yu’s comments were purposefully timed – US Treasury Secretary Geithner embarked on a sudden PR tour of China this weekend. His mission? Keep the cash flowing from America’s No. 1 creditor.

“No one is going to be more concerned about future deficits than we are,” said Geithner, whose government’s budget deficit will exceed $1.75 trillion this year. “As we recover from this unprecedented crisis, we will cut our fiscal deficit [and] we will eliminate the extraordinary government support that we have put in place to overcome the crisis.”

In the meantime, Geithner assured students at Peking University that China’s investments in US paper are “very safe.”

“I doubt the Chinese believed him,” says friend and currency expert Chuck Butler. “Of course, I’m not a Chinese official, so I don’t really know what they are thinking. But I’ve watched them smile and tell former US Treasury Secretary Paulson that they were going to allow greater currency flexibility, and after he would board his plane, it would be business as usual… Same thing for Graham and Schumer, who thought their prestigious status as lawmakers would get them someplace with the Chinese.

“It all comes down to the fact that the US needs China more than the other way around.”

General Motors, once the backbone of US manufacturing, is officially bankrupt. As you’ve no doubt heard, the company declared bankruptcy this morning. But since it’s 2009, lord knows it can’t be a run-of-the-mill insolvency. The Obama administration has its hands deep in this thing… here’s the fine print of the biggest industrial bankruptcy in US history:

• Uncle Sam gets a 60% stake. The government will pump an additional $30 billion into GM (on top of the $20 billion already squandered). In exchange, the government will be the largest shareholder… leverage it will use to usher GM through bankruptcy and convert it to this “leaner, stronger company” we’ve been promised
• Half of the UAW’s $20 billion health care fund will be converted to GM stock, which will give it a 17.5% stake in the company. 12-20 factories will be closed, at the cost of approximately 21,000 union workers. 40% of the 6,000 GM dealers will have to close, too
• The Canadian government gets a 12% stake, given all GM’s design/manufacturing activity up north
• Bondholders were bought (bullied?) out. They’ll swap their $27.1 billion in unsecured debt for 10% of GM, with warrants to own 15% more. Surely, they learned from Chrysler’s bondholders, who were publicly vilified by President Obama for demanding what was lawfully theirs… so much for that hallmark of American capitalism
• Current shareholders get nada. At least that rule of bankruptcy is still intact. If you were long GM, please consider letting someone else manage your money. Anyone.

“GM Bankruptcy to Bring Taxpayer Ownership,” headlined Bloomberg this morning. Shame on them and the US government for perpetuating this “taxpayer ownership” BS.

We must have been asleep when the “taxpayer” got any say in this one. GM is owned by wealthy politicians in Washington who, under threat of imprisonment, forced their constituents to finance the deal. Insinuating the public has any control is “Orwellian in the extreme” Addison suggested when we discussed the matter late Friday. Amen.

And let’s be really honest… taxes haven’t gone up to cover the GM bailout (or any credit crisis expense), but government borrowing certainly has. If any “taxpayers” truly own GM, their tax returns get mailed to Beijing and Tokyo.

Sign of the times… GM and Citigroup (NYSE:C) are getting kicked off the Dow. Cisco and Travelers will replace them next Monday. Extra irony (and foreshadowing?) in this exchange, as Citigroup is the former owner of Travelers, which it spun off in 2002.

The market had baked in GM’s insolvency a long time ago. In fact, the Dow’s off to the races this morning, even though one of its 30 components is rapidly approaching zero (the “beauty” of a weighted index). The big indexes rose 2% within the first 30 minutes of trading.

“We have reached a pivot point in financial markets,” forecasts Rob Parenteau, steward of the Richebächer Society.

“As we have documented in recent weeks, the list of US macro series showing stable nominal levels over the past three-four months continues to increase. These include retail sales, new orders for durable goods and imports of materials and finished goods. That is not what usually happens in a debt-deflation dynamic, which cumulatively builds on itself. It appears the debt-deflation risk is being contained by extreme fiscal and monetary measures.

“Stability is better than free fall, but it is not the same as expansion, and we believe equity investors have shoved valuations high enough over the past three months that they now require signs of economic growth, not just stability, to carry equity indexes higher. We think the odds of them getting that could improve after we get past the auto production and dealer downshift later in the summer, but the rise in Treasury yields is becoming alarming.

“So from a strategic point of view, we believe equity investors want and need to see stronger economic and earnings results to drive indexes higher, while bond investors need just the opposite to calm Treasury yields down. In addition, through near-zero interest rate policy (ZIRP) and quantitative easing (QE) approaches, the Fed has been trying to push private investors into riskier asset classes while the Treasury’s debt issuance calendar implies they need private investors to prefer owning Treasury bonds, which are generally not the asset of choice in an economic recovery scenario.

“In other words, we have contradictory cross currents here. If the Fed doesn’t intervene to slow or halt the Treasury yield backup, there is a chance the stabilization in unit home sales will wither away. If the Fed does step up QE operations to halt the Treasury yield rise, professional investors taking the ‘green toilet paper’ view will continue to sell dollars and buy commodities. Down the line, that implies higher energy prices for consumers and higher input prices for manufacturers, neither of which we would consider growth-supportive developments.”

Just like last week, materials and energy companies are leading the way today. The great global rebound argument is still hot, and this data point is keeping the commodity fire ablaze: China’s manufacturing sector expanded for the third month in a row in May, its government reports. China’s purchasing managers index registered a score of 53.1 during the month, down just a bit from April but still above the expansion/contraction score of 50.

Oil’s up to a fresh seven-month high of $67 a barrel today, largely due to China’s PMI number. On the other had, the dollar is still falling, giving commodities an even bigger boost. The dollar index fell right through support at 80 on Friday and has plunged another point and a half since. It’s at 78.8 as we write, just off its 2009 low.

Thus, the cost of your European vacation has popped 7% since the start of May. The euro is up 9 cents over the last 30 days, to just under $1.42 as we write. The pound has followed suit, up 11 cents over the last month, to $1.62.

And could parity be around the corner for our neighbor to the north? The Canadian dollar is up to 92 cents today, its highest level since October 2008.

Gold continues to flourish, but silver has been the real precious metal story of late. The yellow metal is up about 9% over the last month, to roughly $980 today. Silver, on the other hand, shot up 29% in May, to $15.50 an ounce.

“In general,” says energy and oil expert Byron King, “the precious metals are up because the big-spending politicians in Washington have no respect for the US dollar. Break out the black crepe and armbands of mourning for the US dollar.

“Specifically, silver has always been the “poor man’s gold.” Silver tends to lurk in the shadows of the price of gold, sort of a stepchild to the yellow metal.

“But on occasion, silver undergoes a slingshot effect. Between the basic industrial demand for electronics, plus jewelry demand (’cuz gold’s getting pricey!), and now the monetary pull… silver is accelerating in a price rise that is – believe it or not – leaving gold in the dust.

“Silver could break $20 sooner than we’ll see gold at $1,200, and the silver miners (my readers own several) will soar to new heights. Do you have your ticket for this ride? All aboard!!!”

Silver may continue to outperform gold. If you’re a believer in historic ratios, silver still has room to rise in order to meet its average gold price ratio over the last decade.

Either that, or gold’s price needs to fall. And in this environment, we’d sooner go long silver than short gold. Do you agree?

So again, we thank Ian for his contribution today as guest host and his insightful above look at the news.

Our regular commentary, such as it is…tomorrow.

Bill Bonner

Source: Your Share of the US Debt

In their search for explanations as to why oil has surged past $130 per barrel, Washington, Wall Street and the financial media are as clueless as cavemen after a freak summer snowstorm. Despite the head scratching, the blame game is nevertheless in full force.

Speculators and big oil companies are being trotted out as scapegoats, and increased margin requirements and taxes on windfall profits and futures trading have been mentioned as appropriate sanctions. It should be clear that this is pure farce, and that no one understands what is actually happening.

The reality is that after years of reckless consumption and dollar debasement, Americans are now being priced out of the very markets over which they formerly held unchallenged title. As more affluent foreigners consume more of the resources and products they previously exported to us, Americans are being forced to cut back. The rising dollar-based price of gasoline is simply an illustration of this global trend.

Poorly concealed behind contrived government statistics, the signs of America’s falling standard of living are everywhere; all one has to do is look. We are unloading our SUVs for less-desirable compacts, and are paying more to fly on crowded planes (where we pay to check luggage and dine only on what we bring onboard). We now buy our lattes from McDonald’s Corp. (MCD) or not at all, and we increasingly forego dining out, trips to the mall and vacations – just so we can scrape together enough to fill our gas tanks and kitchen pantries, pay taxes and insurance, or make credit card, mortgage or car payments.

The collective belt tightening is simply the down payment on the U.S. government’s massive bailout of Wall Street investment banks and mortgage lenders. As the U.S. Federal Reserve creates money to buy bad mortgages and other shaky securities held by banks and brokerage firms, the value of the savings and wages of everyone on Main Street will continue to fall. As a result, the costs of products previously taken for granted have begun to bite.

The various housing bills and stimulus packages now passing through Congress will add significantly to the staggering final price tag. In the end, the “free lunch” currently being dished out by Washington will be the most expensive meal ever served. The cost will be borne by ordinary Americans citizens every time they open their wallets. And four-dollar gasoline is just the beginning.

For all the talk of increased global demand, few seem to understand from where it actually comes. The surge in global demand is both a function of the increased purchasing power of foreign currencies and the fact that foreigners are choosing to spend more of their incomes themselves.

In other words, former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan’s famous “global savings glut” is turning into a global consumption binge, with Americans unable to crash the party. This trend will only get worse as the dollar-denominated price of just about everything that is either imported, or capable of being exported, goes through the roof.

We can look for scapegoats all we want but the simple fact is Americans are going to have to get used to a much lower standard of living. Those who have been putting all the food on our tables are finally pulling up chairs and are serving themselves.

Source: That Pain You Feel at the Pump is From a Dollar Crisis, Not an Oil Crisis

The Man Who Tamed Inflation

Volcker is known as “the man who broke the back of inflation” in the early 1980s. He took the hard measures necessary to undo the damage wrought in the wild 1970s. The double-digit interest rates Volcker imposed were extremely punishing, though; he had to endure hatred and ridicule to see the job through.

In one lasting example of the fortitude required, angry builders sent two-by-fours to Volcker’s office, to show how outraged they were by the slowdown he created. He let the boards pile up and carried on. The tough discipline paid off, and the U.S. entered a historic boom time once inflation was tamed.

In assessing the current Fed, the old disciplinarian doesn’t much like what he sees. On Tuesday, someone asked Volcker if a U.S. dollar crisis was in the works. His response was blunt: “You don’t have to predict it. We’re in it.”

On the matter of the Bear Stearns rescue, Volcker said the Fed had gone “to the very edge of its lawful and implied power.” He added that the current climate reminds him of the early 1970s… and he wasn’t talking about fashion.

A Bitter Maestro

The second ex-Fed head we heard from this week is the pygmy, Alan Greenspan. Once known as “The Maestro” for his ability to sway markets, Greenspan has been reduced to a small, crotchety, bitter little man. These days, The Maestro expends half his energy trying to win back the spotlight he loved so dearly; the other half goes to defending his tattered reputation.

Greenspan’s self-centered howls of self-defense grew rather shrill this week. After once being hailed as “the greatest central banker who ever lived,” more accurate assessments — like the one that suggests he may have been the worst central banker who ever lived — seem to be getting to the man.

The Maestro’s mission is to absolve himself of all responsibility for the current crisis. For all the rambling and double-talk, his excuses boil down to three basic assertions: “You weren’t there; you couldn’t know what it was like; such-and-such bubble simply couldn’t have been my fault.”

The first two points are true as far as it goes. We critics weren’t in the man’s shoes; we don’t know what it was like. But we do know that in 1967, a younger, more idealistic Greenspan wrote an essay titled “Gold and Economic Freedom,” in which he stated the following:

In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value… This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists’ tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights.

Those words make Greenspan one of two things. Either he is a jaw-dropping hypocrite, or he is one of the greatest double agents of all time. Perhaps many years down the road, when the fiat money system has finally collapsed and some new form of gold standard has been restored, the Maestro will leave a full libertarian confession on his death bed.

The Opposite of Courage

Needless to say, those waiting for a confession shouldn’t hold their breath. The truth of what happened is likely far less inspiring. Where Chairman Volcker rose to a hard task, showing himself to be a giant, Chairman Greenspan shrank timidly from his duties, showing himself to be a pygmy.

Volcker saw what needed to be done and did it, sparing little concern for the criticism and even outright hatred he would have to endure. Greenspan tested the waters of courage as far back as 1996 — the year of the famous “irrational exuberance” phrase — and decided that even the smallest backlash would be too high a price to pay. That tentative warning in 1996 was the last one we heard; it was all warm smiles and eagerness to please after that.

The Maestro chose to bask in glory and adoration rather than do what was right. Where he could have been strong, he was weak. Where he could have been stern, he was gentle. Where he should have been responsible, he broke out the pom-poms and acted as cheerleader instead. He thought only of being loved, regardless of future cost. For a supposed leader with a heavy burden of responsibility, that counts as a disastrous failing.

For 18 years, Greenspan unfailingly gave Wall Street exactly what it wanted — easy money plus lax oversight — and now we are paying the price. The current Fed would not be forced to explore “the very edge of its lawful and implied power,” as Paul Volcker lamented, if not for the massive mess Greenspan left behind.