Motorola’s stock is up nearly 12% since the announcement, as investors are hoping the new phone will be enough to win back some of the company’s lost market share.

However, saving Motorola’s mobile division – which the company plans to spin off – is a daunting task. The company – which invented the cell phone, as well as a plethora of other communication devices used by police and military – has seen its global market share of wireless phones fall to 2% in its second quarter this year from 31% in 1995. Mobile phone sales accounted for 33% of Motorola’s second-quarter revenue, down from 41% a year ago.

Motorola had enjoyed some success in 2004 when it released its popular Razr clamshell-style phone, which was viewed as a fashionable and useful high-tech gadget. During its four-year run, more than 110 million Razrs were sold.

However, Motorola failed to respond to innovation in the mobile phone market that was pioneered by its fiercest competitors. Apple and RIMM have whittled away at Motorola’s market share over the past five years.

With the Cliq, Motorola is trying to separate from the competition by angling its device toward a younger, less professional base. The Cliq’s biggest draw will be its quick access to social networking content from Facebook Inc., Twitter Inc. and News Corp.’s (NYSE: NWS) MySpace.

“Our initial take is favorable, and it seems that Motorola is carving out a niche in the crowded smartphone market by focusing on socially minded demographics as opposed to enterprise users or pro-sumers,” RBC Capital Markets Corp. analyst Mark Sue told Reuters. Sue upped his share target for Motorola from $8 to $10 a share.

Aside from that distinction, the Cliq includes features typically found in most any smartphone: A touch screen, slide-out keyboard, and access to an application store. It runs on Google Inc.’s (Nasdaq: GOOG) Android mobile operating system, already found on two other T-Mobile Phones.

However, if Motorola’s Android-based phones are going to take off, they’ll need bigger wireless carriers. The phones currently function on Deutsche Telecom AG’s (NYSE ADR: DT) T-Mobile USA Inc. network. But with just 34 million users, T-Mobile is the fourth-largest carrier in the United States.

For that reason, a second Android phone will be offered for Verizon Communications Inc.’s (NYSE: VZ) mobile network, which is nearly three times as large. Verizon Wireless has about 88 million subscribers and is the largest carrier in the United States.

Wall Street may be underestimating the boost in profit Motorola will get from its smartphone line in 2010, UBS AG (NYSE: UBS) analyst Maynard Um said in a note to investors. Um has upgraded the communications firm’s stock to “buy” from “neutral.” Um attributed the upgrade to the expected holiday release of the Cliq, as well as additional deals with mobile carriers in the fourth quarter.

Pricing for the Cliq was not announced, but Um anticipates recession-friendly pricing.

“We do not expect new competitor handset announcements to have a materially negative sentiment impact on Motorola, as the company is not defending share, likely only has share upside, and is likely to be an aggressor on price,” he wrote.

A sizeable boost in profit could come from the Android phones’ access to the Android Market, Google’s application store. Apple’s App Store for its iPhone and iPod Touch devices have proven to be a boon for the company, with more than 1.8 billion paid and free apps downloaded since its debut in July 2008. While many of the apps, such as those from The New York Times are free, they present consumers a strong value proposition when buying a smartphone.

However, Apple’s App Store has more than 75,000 applications available, while Google’s Android Market offers just 10,000 apps.

Motorola will add more Android-based phones next year, Chief Executive Officer Sanjay Jha said at a conference last week in San Francisco, and Avian Securities LLC analyst Matt Thornton expects Android phones to represent 30% of the total handsets it sells in 2010, Bloomberg News reported.

“It’s the first step in a long journey,” said Jha, who insists the Cliq will not make or break his company.

In March 2008, Motorola to split its core business from its mobile division after pressure from billionaire investor Carl Ichan mounted. At the time, analysts said the split would put the company in a better position to sell assets or negotiate a joint venture.

A week later, Videocon Industries Ltd., the largest electronics maker in India, said it was interested in buying Motorola’s mobile business. However, neither a sale nor split of Motorola has happened.

Motorola shares closed at $8.79 in trading yesterday (Monday), up 11 cents or 1.27%.

Source: Hot Stocks: Motorola Throws Hat Into Smartphone Ring

Investment News Briefs Wednesday, September 9, 2009

And with some justification, for China and the two Asian “tigers” share some alluring characteristics like:

• A highly competitive and innovative manufacturing industry.
• Excellent government and workforce discipline.
• Modest fiscal and monetary stimulus (or, like China, they started from a position of budget surplus).
• And an export orientation that seems likely to benefit quickly as order is restored in the global trading economy.

But there’s another country that shares those characteristics. It’s nowhere near East Asia. But investors can expect this particular economy to also bounce back from this recession with considerable vigor.

I’m talking about the center of supposedly sclerotic Old Europe itself: Germany.

Germany lacks the huge financial sector that has been the bane of the United States and British economies, but it has manufacturing industry that is the envy of the world. Its balance of payments surplus was $205.8 billion in the 12 months through April, and is expected to be 4.4% of gross domestic product (GDP) for all of 2009.

The German government resisted the urge to splurge on “stimulus” packages, and consequently is expected to run a budget deficit of only 4.4% of GDP in 2009 – a ratio that’s far smaller than those of other “advanced” economies, and one that should be easy to finance. Furthermore, the European Central Bank (ECB) has been the most conservative of all major central banks outside Brazil, and German Chancellor Angela Merkel has indicated pretty strongly that it had better stay that way, as she is worried about inflation.

German labor discipline is world-famous, partly because of its sophisticated system of “mitbestimmung” (co-determination) between industry and labor unions. Thus, Germany loses only four days to strikes per 1,000 employees in an average year, an average that’s well below the same statistic for each of its European neighbors. Skill levels are also excellent, because of the superior German education system, much of which is run in partnership with industry.

Because of its more conservative fiscal stance – with less stimulus – Germany has suffered through a much-deeper recession than many other countries, with first-quarter GDP down 6.9% from the previous year.

By comparison, economic output declined 2.5% in the United States and 4.2% in Korea, but 8.8% in Japan and 10.2% in Taiwan.  However, manufacturing orders stabilized in April and it seems likely that Germany will experience a return to growth in the second half of 2009. The ZEW indicator of German economic sentiment for June came in at 44.8 – up more than 13 points from the previous month, and a three-year high. When Germany starts to recover, its economic rebound is likely to be healthy, without resurgent inflation or bond market turmoil, because of Germany’s cautious fiscal and monetary policies.

What to buy? Well, for a start there’s the German exchange-traded fund (ETF), the iShares MSCI Germany Index (NYSE:EWG). At $489 million, it’s surprisingly small, but it has a Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio of 12 and a yield of 6.4%, meaning it provides shareholders with a decent income. It also provides a much-broader exposure to the German market than do the American Depository Receipt (ADR) shares, which relate only to very large companies, and not to the highly successful “mittelstand” medium-sized enterprises.

There are eight German companies whose ADRs have a sponsored full listing on the New York Stock Exchange (several others have moved to the Pink Sheets recently because of the costs of Sarbanes-Oxley compliance). Of these, Infineon Technologies AG (OTC ADR: IFNNY), a semiconductor manufacturer, is making a loss, while Qimonda AG (OTC ADR: QMNDQ), a maker of computer memory devices, is in bankruptcy.
That leaves six possible profit plays:

• Allianz SE: (NYSE ADR: AZ): This huge insurance company sold its shares in Dresdner Bank AG and is now a shareholder in Commerzbank AG (OTC ADR: CRZBY). Allianz lost money in 2008 because of investment losses, but is trading on only nine times projected 2009 earnings, with a 5% dividend yield.

• Daimler AG (NYSE ADR: DAI): A major automaker, and producer of the upscale Mercedes Benz brand (including the fashionable “Smart” small car), Daimler is now thankfully devoid of Chrysler LLCinvolvement. Daimler gratuitously tossed away a considerable amount of shareholder value with two foolish diversifications – into aerospace in the 1980s and into Chrysler in the 1990s. If management can keep its eyes on the road (stay on the black stuff between the trees), this stock could be quite attractive. Daimler’s shares are trading at 20 times recession-year earnings. The dividend yield is only 1.7%, but overall there’s a lot of upside in an economic recovery.

• Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE ADR: DB): This is Germany’s premier bank and investment bank, but it is currently losing money and the stock yields only 1%. For a play on a German financial sector recovery, I prefer Allianz.

• Deutsche Telekom AG (NYSE ADR: DT): Germany’s traditional fixed-line telephone service, Deutsche Telekom also has mobile-phone operations and has increased its revenue by also offering high-speed Internet access. Currently operating at a loss, DT also cut its dividend. Avoid – there are better telecom plays out there.

• SAP AG (NYSE ADR: SAP):  A globally known provider of so-called “enterprise resource planning” (ERP) software, SAP shares have a dividend yield of only 1.2%, and are trading at 19 times prospective earnings. The stock looks a bit pricey to me: I like the sector, but not SAP’s bureaucracy-friendly product line.

• Siemens AG (NYSE ADR: SI): With its wide array of product offerings, Siemens is operationally akin to General Electric Co. (NYSE: GE). Indeed, with  heavy-equipment offerings that range from locomotives to electric power plants, Siemens is selling the kinds of products that are likely to benefit from heavy “stimulus” spending worldwide. The company has recovered from losses in 2006. But the shares are trading at only 11 times estimated earnings for the 12 months that end in September. That low valuation, coupled with a nice dividend yield of 2.9%, makes the stock appear fairly attractive.

Source: Germany: Emerging Market Profit Potential, With (Only) Developed Market Risk

This from Money Morning:

Commentators are tripping over one another to declare this country or that country’s stimulus package as a primary reason to pour money into its stock market. Yet if you look at the highly damaging long-term effects of such loose monetary and fiscal policies, an investor can come to only one conclusion: You should invest in the country with the smallest stimulus package.

Stimulus packages are all the rage right now. President-elect Barack Obama has promised an $800 billion package for the United States, which equates to nearly 7% of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP). And there are plenty of others:

• Japan has a stimulus package of $720 billion – roughly 14% of GDP.
• South Korea plans two stimulus packages – the larger of them “green” – totaling about $50 billion, or about 6% of GDP.
• Great Britain is expected to inject about $177 billion into its economy, the equivalent of 8% of GDP.
• France has a modest $40 billion stimulus package in place but that’s on top of a $300 billion European Union (EU) stimulus package, so the total’s about 3% of GDP.
• China has announced a $586 billion stimulus – almost 20% of GDP – and now appears to have decided even that is too little.

Then there’s Germany. When the British stimulus was announced, Germany’s finance minister, Peer Steinbruck, described it as “crass Keynesianism.” Since then, he’s been forced to back off that stance a bit: On Jan. 12, Germany announced a stimulus plan totaling $70 billion over two years.

Still, even that is only is a relatively modest 2% of GDP, and Germany’s 2009 budget deficit – even with the stimulus – is projected to come in at less than 3% of GDP. That’s far less of a deficit than the country faced during the 2001-2003 recession, and means that Germany enjoys one of the soundest fiscal positions of any country in the world.

Germany’s short-term economic outlook is unexciting, as is currently the case for most countries. According to The Economist, the country’s GDP is forecast to shrink by 1.4% in 2009, after actually advancing 1.0% in 2008. That’s equal to the Euro zone average and equal to Japan, a bit less than the United States (projected at minus 1.2%), but better than Britain (minus 1.7%). But at a projected 1.0%, at least inflation at 1% is expected to be satisfactorily low.

Where Germany stands out, however, is when you look at its balance of payments, which is in surplus by $265 billion in the year to November 2008 – the equivalent of 6.6% of GDP. That immediately distinguishes it from the finance-based economies of the United States and Britain, both of which have perennial balance-of-payment deficits.

The most impressive thing about the German payments surplus is that it is achieved against a background of some of the highest wage rates in the world, very heavy tax and Social Security costs and a strong euro exchange rate. Even though it has among the world’s highest labor costs, Germany also has among the world’s highest labor skill levels, and those are more concentrated in manufacturing than in finance or business services, making the German economy less vulnerable to this finance-based recession or to erosion through globalization.

Like other countries, Germany will see its exports hit by this global recession, but it has the ability to grow domestic demand to compensate without affecting its budget or payments position.

For a decade and a half, the German economy and its budget were bedeviled by the huge costs of integrating the former communist East Germany into the West. However, that was a one-off cost; anyone who graduated high school in East Germany under Communism before 1989 is now nearing 40, so younger workers have been given the education and training common to their splendidly productive West German counterparts. From about 2005 on, the drag on the budget and on productivity from East German integration costs has begun to decline, and it will continue declining in the years ahead.

With its low budget deficit and large payments surplus, Germany is the strongest economy in the EU. It is potentially the strongest economy in the world; while the United States, Japan and Britain will struggle for years with the nasty side-effects of their massive government-stimulus spending, Germany will remain in sound shape.

It is thus likely that over the next few years, the huge flows of “safe haven” money that for decades helped prop up the U.S. Treasuries market will flow instead into the German bund and equities markets: After all, where the hell else is there? That will reduce German interest rates and increase multiples on German stocks. For an international investor, it thus becomes essential to have a significant part of your portfolio in German stocks.

What to buy? Well, for a start there’s the German exchange-traded fund (ETF), the iShares MSCI Germany Index (NYSE:EWG). At $334 million, it’s surprisingly small, but it has a Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio of 9.6, and a yield of 6.6%, so this ETF provides decent income as well as a broad exposure to the German market.

There are eight German companies whose American Depository Receipts (ADRs) have a full sponsored listing on the New York Stock Exchange (several others have moved to the Pink Sheets recently because of the costs of Sarbanes-Oxley compliance).

Of these, Allianz SE (ADR:AZ) and Deutsche Bank AG (DB) are both caught up in the travails of the global financial-services sector, while financial services industry’s travails, while Daimler AG (DAI) offers the limited prospects of the automotive industry (though Daimler’s a good bet once economic recovery is clearly in sight). Infineon Technologies AG (ADR: IFX), a semiconductor manufacturer, and Qimonda AG (ADR: QI), a maker of computer memory devices, are each currently making losses.

That means there are only three other possible recommendations, which is why, if you want a broad exposure to the German market, you should also consider a mutual fund or an ETF like EWG.

Deutsche Telekom AG (ADR:DT) is Germany’s traditional fixed-line telephone service, which has mobile operations and that also has increased revenue by providing high-speed Internet access services. Based on both 2008 and 2009 earnings, the P/E ratio of its shares is a somewhat high 15. On the other hand, however, the stock’s dividend yield is better than 8%. A dividend cut must be possible, but the company in general seems fairly recession-proof.

SAP AG (ADR:SAP), the well-known international maker and marketer of enterprise software, has a lower dividend yield of only 2.1%, but much better earnings-growth prospects: 2009 is currently projected ahead of 2008. At 14 times earnings, the stock currently looks cheap for this sector.

Siemens AG (ADR:SI) is active in a broad range of heavy equipment, including items such as locomotives and electric power plants – the very kinds of businesses that are likely to benefit from heavy “stimulus” spending worldwide, especially infusions aimed at infrastructure development, which is very much the case in China.

With Siemens having recovered from losses in 2006, the company’s shares are now trading on only 8 times estimated earnings for the year to September 2009, with a dividend yield of 3.7%. They seem attractively priced.

Source: Four Ways to Profit From the Country With the Smallest Stimulus Package

And these aren’t the best of times. So why are there 153 companies with a P/E ratio of over 100 (according to the search I did on my Yahoo stock screener)?

I didn’t go through every one of these companies. But going through about half of them, I found that just a few earned their high P/E ratios because of strong growth fundamentals.

Usually, it was because earnings have fallen faster than the price. eBay (EBAY) is a good example. Its earnings have dropped 65% over the past 12 months. But its price has only dropped 8 percent from a year ago. Its P/E ratio is 99. eBay has gotten more expensive from having a bad year, not a good year.

UPS is another super-expensive stock. Its P/E ratio is 173. Its earnings have gone down 89 percent over the last year. During the same period, its price has actually increased by 3.4 percent. It’s true that UPS shares look overbought, but why even buy this stock on the dip?

It’s not only U.S. stocks that are getting a rich valuation from earnings falling faster than share prices. Deutsche Telecom (DT) from Germany followed this same pattern. DT’s earnings dropped 82 percent this past year. Its P/E ratio is 91. Telefonica de Argentina (TAR) is another overseas example. With a P/E ratio of 91, its earnings dropped 67 percent over the past 12 months.

Do any of these highly priced companies actually deserve their rich valuation? There are rare exceptions to this pattern and one comes from overseas. Baidu is China’s Google. Its P/E ratio is 127. But it also grew its earnings over the past year by 95 percent. Phoenix-based First Solar’s (FSLR) P/E ratio is 110. But its earnings grew over 1,000 percent last year.

Investing in stocks with P/Es of over 100 has always been a risky proposition. It’s hard to sustain such a high valuation for long. Google was one of the few that managed to do it. But even mighty Google’s valuation has fallen back to earth. Its P/E is now just over 40.

At one time, you could have argued that Google’s ultra-fast growth in revenue and earnings warranted such a high P/E ratio. With very few exceptions, the current crop of super-expensive companies can make no such claim.