<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; Economic Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/economic-problem/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why I Don&#8217;t Care About Fixing the World (and Neither Should You)</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/why-i-dont-care-about-fixing-the-world-and-neither-should-you/18803</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/why-i-dont-care-about-fixing-the-world-and-neither-should-you/18803#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justice Litle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Litle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ll forgive the indulgence, today I&#8217;d like to respond  to an interesting – and personal – reader inquiry. The question may not have  been intended as personal, but it wound up inspiring a fair bit of reflection.  Here it is:</p>
<p style="PADDING-LEFT: 30px"><em>Mr.  Litle,</em></p>
<p style="PADDING-LEFT: 30px"><em>I  find your opinions on the world and U.S. economies very fascinating, to say the  least. What I will like to read more of, if you can, is your opinions on some  potential solution to these problems, or are you just good at highlighting  problem but no solutions?</em></p>
<p style="PADDING-LEFT: 30px"><em>Thanks  for your time in advance.</em></p>
<p style="PADDING-LEFT: 30px">– <em>TD</em> Reader &#8220;Chuck&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks, Chuck! (I think&#8230;)</p>
<p>If you want all the solutions you can stomach, here&#8217;s what I  suggest. First, subscribe to <em>Forbes</em> and <em>The Economist</em> (two highly respected financial&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ll forgive the indulgence, today I&#8217;d like to respond  to an interesting – and personal – reader inquiry. The question may not have  been intended as personal, but it wound up inspiring a fair bit of reflection.  Here it is:<span id="more-18803"></span></p>
<p style="PADDING-LEFT: 30px"><em>Mr.  Litle,</em></p>
<p style="PADDING-LEFT: 30px"><em>I  find your opinions on the world and U.S. economies very fascinating, to say the  least. What I will like to read more of, if you can, is your opinions on some  potential solution to these problems, or are you just good at highlighting  problem but no solutions?</em></p>
<p style="PADDING-LEFT: 30px"><em>Thanks  for your time in advance.</em></p>
<p style="PADDING-LEFT: 30px">– <em>TD</em> Reader &#8220;Chuck&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks, Chuck! (I think&#8230;)</p>
<p>If you want all the solutions you can stomach, here&#8217;s what I  suggest. First, subscribe to <em>Forbes</em> and <em>The Economist</em> (two highly respected financial rags). Then  make sure to catch Steve  Forbes&#8217; opening column in each issue of <em>Forbes</em>, and furthermore scan the final paragraphs in the lead  article section of <em>The Economist </em>each  week.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a tongue-in-cheek suggestion (as you might have  guessed). But you really will find a smorgasbord of &#8220;solutions&#8221; that way. Steve  Forbes seems to have a forcefully simplistic opinion on how to fix every single  economic problem on the planet. In similar vein, <em>The Economist</em> never tires of ending pieces  with a schoolmarmish finger wag that always  boils down to, &#8220;It would simply be best if world leaders did X.&#8221;</p>
<p>I subscribe to both of those venerable publications (plus at  least a dozen others, if not more), and I take in absurd quantities of  market-related information every single day. The challenge of this process  requires me to read at different speeds, ranging from &#8220;leisurely&#8221; to &#8220;lightning  bolt.&#8221; When it comes to the hand-waving solutions, I zip right past ‘em as if  they weren&#8217;t even there. (When I come across a Thomas Friedman column, it&#8217;s like a blank page.)</p>
<p>The reason why is because most &#8220;solutions&#8221; of the forcefully  delivered type fall into what I call the perfect world trap. The trap applies  if whatever solution being offered deserves a &#8220;perfect world&#8221; qualifier. For  example, &#8220;in a perfect world, Americans would have a more rational attitude  towards healthcare.&#8221; Or, &#8220;in a perfect world, politicians would have a  long-term rather than short-term focus.&#8221; And so on.</p>
<p>Many answers to the world&#8217;s problems are obvious in terms of  what &#8220;should&#8221; be done. The more interesting question, in my view, is why what  &#8220;should&#8221; be done in a perfect world so rarely plays out in the real one. Power  corrupts. Self interest corrodes. Human nature throws a monkey wrench into the  works yet again. And so it goes&#8230;</p>
<p>As a result of the many slips twixt cup and lip, the gap  between clean theory and messy reality is more often than not Grand-Canyon  sized. And thus I find myself with zero patience for goobers like Steve Forbes  who, in their constant righteous claims of what &#8220;should&#8221; be done, act as if  such a gap does not exist.</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t always so &#8220;anti-solution.&#8221; There was a time when I,  too, thought fixing the world was merely a matter of getting the right  multi-step instruction guide into the right hands. Over time, though, I soaked  up more of the zen-like wisdom embedded in the old  saying, &#8220;The wise man thinks what is easy is hard.&#8221;</p>
<div>
<div style="border: 1px solid #debe7c; padding: 4px; background: #f2ead7 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; width: 590px; text-align: left;">
<p><strong>Right now, you could &#8220;pirate&#8221; $18,187 from corporate account #865851</strong></p>
<p>A little-known clause buried deep in Section 77F of the SEC code gives you the legal right to plunder huge lump sums of cash from any public corporate account. And as I write this, you could <a title="Find Out How Here" href="https://www.web-purchases.com/TAI/NTAIK618/landing.html" target="_blank">swipe an easy $18,187 from just one of these accounts</a>.</div>
</div>
<p><strong>Pragmatism and Profit</strong></p>
<p>So why talk about this stuff then? Why bring up the world&#8217;s  troubles in these pages, and dissect them as we do, if sweeping solutions are  not the main point of interest?</p>
<p>I see two powerful reasons to do so – pragmatism and  knowledge.</p>
<p>First, on the pragmatic side, let me share a crass aside  with you. I intend to retire rich. Actually, I&#8217;ll probably never retire&#8230; I  love what I do so much that it hardly feels like work. I can just as easily  write to you, or make adjustments to my trading portfolio, from a luxury lodge  in New Zealand or an old world villa in Spain as from my comfortable home  office here in Reno/Tahoe.</p>
<p>But anyhow, point being, it is my direct and deliberate  intent to accumulate a vast sum of wealth before riding off into the sunset. I  don&#8217;t really give a damn about the money&#8230; but I love freedom and I love the  great game that is markets. Trading is my passion.</p>
<p>And so, when something of import happens or some new  political development bursts on the scene, the natural approach for yours truly  is not, <em>&#8220;Hmm&#8230; how can I find the ideal  solution to this issue so that I can share it with the world in hopes that they  will listen?&#8221; </em></p>
<p>Instead, my internal response runs more along the lines of, <em>&#8220;Okay, what kind of curveball are these  goofballs going to throw at us next&#8230; and how can we hit it out of the park?&#8221; </em></p>
<p>Or, more simply put, <em>&#8220;How  might this development impact markets, in either the short run or the long run  (or both)? How can we profit from this (or just as importantly, avoid loss)?&#8221;</em></p>
<p>You see, pragmatically speaking, you and I can&#8217;t do a thing  about the decisions being made in Washington, Brussels or Beijing. (They&#8217;re not  listening to muckety-mucks like Steve Forbes or <em>The Economist, </em>so why in the world would they listen to us?)</p>
<p>Nor can we repeal human nature, or cure short-sightedness,  or otherwise turn water into wine. But what we <em>can </em>do is accept the world as it is&#8230; interpret reality as it  stands&#8230; and seek to create prosperity for <em>ourselves </em>from the swirling nexus of forces that drives current events.</p>
<p>One of the ironies in all this, I believe, is that the  righteous souls hell-bent on saving the world often find themselves neglecting  their own little corner of it. So much time and energy is spent banging on  about impossibly idealistic solutions that <em>real </em>steps in the direction of <em>real</em> goals and dreams are left untaken.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the general trouble, as I see it, with the popular  focus on &#8220;making a difference.&#8221; All too often, the key question &#8220;Making a  difference to whom?&#8221; is never properly considered.</p>
<p><strong>Why the World Wags  and What Wags It</strong></p>
<p><em>&#8220;But hold on just a  second,&#8221;</em> I hear some of you say. <em>&#8220;</em><a href="http://www.taipanpublishing.com"  class="alinks_links" onclick="return alinks_click(this);" title="Taipan Publishing"  style="padding-right: 13px; background: url(http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-content/plugins/alinks/images/external.png) center right no-repeat;" rel="external">Taipan</a> Daily<em> isn&#8217;t all pragmatism, all the time, as you seem to be suggesting here.  On occasion you talk about civil liberties and historic world events and other  such things. And sometimes you guys take the odd turn that seems to have little  to do with trading and investing at all. So what gives?</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>To which I say, yep, absolutely true. It&#8217;s not all &#8220;show me  the money&#8221; around here, if you&#8217;ll pardon the phrase.</p>
<p>And there are reasons for that too&#8230; the first one being  that a real body of knowledge (as related to trading and investing) is broad  and diverse and takes time to build – sometimes taking one to unexpected  places. I have always seen that as a good thing, not a bad thing.</p>
<p>When I first got excited about markets (back in my  wet-behind-the-ears college days), it was in part because trading and investing  seemed such a grand excuse to learn a little bit about everything, yet still  put that knowledge to work in a pragmatic way.</p>
<p>In other words, to be a trading and investing virtuoso  requires some level of comfort and familiarity not just in the realms of  finance and economics, but history, psychology, sociology, philosophy, game  theory&#8230; even biology and physics to some degree&#8230; the list goes on and on.  Above all, in your humble editor&#8217;s view, success in markets is tied to an  intimate knowledge of the human condition (including one&#8217;s self) and the  ongoing state of the world at large.</p>
<p>Again, what a great excuse to dig in and learn new things!  There&#8217;s a lot happening on this silly old ball, as <a href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/author/bill-bonner/"  class="alinks_links" onclick="return alinks_click(this);" title=""  style="padding-right: 13px; background: url(http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-content/plugins/alinks/images/external.png) center right no-repeat;" rel="external">Bill Bonner</a> sometimes likes  to call it – and I, for one, often feel like a little kid turning over rocks in  the woods, bursting with curiosity at the next potential find.</p>
<p>So in that respect, too, <em>Taipan  Daily</em> is less focused on packaged solutions because there&#8217;s only so much  time and energy to spare. Telling the world what should be done leaves less  room for understanding the world as it is&#8230; and figuring out what might happen  next&#8230; and learning how to profit from it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll leave you with one of my all-time favorite quotes, from  T.H. White in <em><a title="Amazon: The Once And Future King" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0441003834?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=taipanpublishinggroup-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0441003834" target="_blank">The  Once and Future King</a></em>. Merlyn said it better than I ever could:</p>
<p style="PADDING-LEFT: 30px"><strong><em>&#8220;</em></strong><em>The best thing for being sad,&#8221; replied Merlyn, &#8220;&#8230;is to learn to  something. That is the only thing that never fails. You may grow old and  trembling in your anatomies, you may lie awake at night listening to the  disorder of your veins, you may miss your only love, you may see the world  about you devastated by evil lunatics, or know your honor trampled in the  sewers of baser minds. There is only one thing for it then – to learn. Learn  why the world wags and what wags it. That is the only thing which the mind can  never exhaust, never alienate, never be tortured by, never fear or distrust,  and never dream of regretting.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.taipanpublishinggroup.com/taipan-daily-070709.html">Why I Don&#8217;t Care About Fixing the World (and Neither</a> <a href="http://www.taipanpublishinggroup.com/taipan-daily-070709.html">Should You)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/why-i-dont-care-about-fixing-the-world-and-neither-should-you/18803/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.189 seconds -->

