Louis James (Casey’s International Speculator):

At a recent Casey Research editors’ meeting, the team took on the question of whether the somewhat steady recovery since last February’s washout bottom in the broader markets had any of us thinking that the recession might be over. The gathering of minds included: Doug Casey, Managing Director David Galland, CEO Olivier Garret, Casey Chief Economist Bud Conrad, Senior Energy Analyst Marin Katusa (my counterpart on the energy side), myself heading the metals division, and several other editors.

Doug’s guru-vision remains locked on the disaster channel. The U.S. economic problems, he says, remain so profound and, if anything, have been worsened by the government’s actions, that Americans are headed for a significant lowering of their standard of living.

As this reality unfolds, it will send out shock waves that will impact much of the world: the Greater Depression.

And the next step, Doug believes, will be a change in interest rates. The Bright Boys in DC will resist doing this, but while they seem willing to let the dollar slide to ease their mounting debts, they don’t want it to crash. They may soon be forced to raise interest rates. When that happens, Wall Street usually moves in the opposite direction – which could be the end of the “Things Aren’t as Bad as We Thought” rally of 2009.

Bud Conrad – in proper, responsible chief economist-style – considered the question carefully and conceded that there do indeed seem to be many “green shoots” now, but still concluded that conditions will continue deteriorating. He sees the government deficits in the driver’s seat, the main variable to keep a watch on.

As the U.S. government persists with its spending spree, valiantly dousing the deficit fire with more debt-gasoline, it will continue destroying the dollar, and that will push ever more people into gold.

A year ago, Bud predicted that gold would top $1,150 by year-end 2009. His call was bolder than most forecasters’ – but he was right. Looking at the numbers today, Bud’s new baseline 2010 forecast is for gold to top $1,450. He sees a “possibility of further international instability or currency debasement as adding to that baseline.” In plain language, Bud’s confident that resource stocks of all sorts will, on average, benefit greatly from the demise of the U.S. dollar.

Somehow, I can’t shake the image of Bud singing Don’t Fear The Reaper with Blue Öyster Cult for back-up… but that’s really more like something Marin would do.

Speaking of Marin Katusa, he commented that there is money to be made in the current rebound environment, but speculators should be extremely cautious: “You should know you’re dancing with the devil in the pale moonlight. You need to make sure you know the dance steps: get in early and exit before you get the dip by the devil at the end of the song.” (Marin not only has made huge amounts of money for our subscribers, he sings in a rock band, so he knows what he’s talking about.)

My own thinking has evolved into seeing 2009 as being like the eye of a monstrous storm.

The sky has cleared substantially, and the sea looks amazingly calm, given what we’ve just been through. But it’s not over yet; the trailing edge of the storm always delivers the most damage, and that’s yet to come. Anyone fooled into abandoning shelter is taking a terrible risk.

This doesn’t mean we should stay huddled in our huts, however – it makes more sense to go out, restock supplies, repair what damage we can, and get ready for the deluge to come. The renewed fury of the storm will sink many more ships, but it will also make vast fortunes for those who invest in the ships that survive and even thrive in the tumult.

Essential strategy: For the near term, buy only an initial “tranche” (portion of your desired position) in the most storm-proof (cash-rich) companies you can find – ideally with great discovery or development stories that will deliver exciting news regardless of market conditions – and hold a good chunk of cash in reserve for the next big buying opportunity.

Nothing goes up in a straight line, as share prices over the last month have amply demonstrated. There are some great picks that have been heading up all year that are now paused in their advances. Any more correction in precious metals could put them on sale, temporarily, offering great buying opportunities with a lot of the technical (e.g., discovery) risk removed from the plays. You’ll kick yourself if you don’t have any cash on hand to take advantage of them – and kick twice as hard if you paid too much for a large whack of something that goes on sale.

Worried about sitting on cash with the U.S. dollar in a death spiral? Remember: gold is also cash, highly liquid, and with terrific speculative upside to boot.

With gold having just corrected sharply (as I predicted it would in Casey’s International Speculator), gold is unquestionably the best investment we can recommend right now – fluctuations aside, it has nowhere to go but up for quite some time. Perhaps as long as a decade.

That, plus our essential “eye of the storm” strategy as above is what we’re recommending to all our subscribers – and indeed to all investors around the world who want to not only survive the trailing edge of the financial storm still to come, but thrive because of it.

While gold has gone up 38% since last December, junior gold stocks can provide even greater gains than the yellow metal itself. Currently, for example, Louis is following eight juniors that have all the right conditions to become takeover targets by gold majors… which would drive share prices through the roof. If you want to get in early, this is the time: with our special holiday offer, you’ll save $400 on a one-year subscription of Casey’s International Speculator – but only until midnight, December 18. Hurry up and click here to learn more.

An interview with Marin Katusa, Casey Research

In the past three years, Marin Katusa, senior energy analyst at Casey Research, has become one of the most respected and listened-to authorities in the investment advisory business. He spends the bulk of his time on airplanes and in far-off places studying the future of energy… and the best ways to make money from it.

Brian Hunt, editor in chief of Stansberry’s free online investment digest, The Daily Crux, interviewed Marin to get his take on where oil prices are headed for the long-term… the regions where investors and traders should focus their dollars… and some of his favorite energy companies with massive upside.

The Daily Crux: Marin… we noticed you guys at Casey Research are bullish on energy. Can you explain to us why?

Marin Katusa: Well, as we’ve mentioned in our Casey Energy letters, we’re short-term bears but long-term bulls.

I think there’s a very good chance oil will be knocked back down along with other markets in the short term, but I’d consider that a rare opportunity to buy the best companies at a steep discount. Long term, I’m very bullish on oil because I think the supply of cheap oil is running out.

The days of cheap and easy oil are over. Oil is getting harder and harder to extract because most of the easy-to-find deposits have already been found and extracted.

The best remaining deposits are deep underwater like in the Gulf of Mexico or offshore of Brazil, in state-controlled or politically unstable areas like Iran and Venezuela, or experiencing dramatically falling production like Mexico. There are also huge oil-sands deposits in Canada, but these are more expensive to extract – anywhere from $35-$40 per barrel for existing production, up to $65 or more for new production.

The simple fact is oil prices will eventually rise due to the increased costs involved in meeting existing demand.

On top of that, you’ve got developing countries beginning to significantly increase their own demand. Right now, you’ve got just 30 or so of the world’s most developed countries, known as the OECD, that consume about half of all the oil produced.

As emerging countries like China and India begin to increase their standard of living, they’ll start using a lot more oil. As you guys know, oil consumption per capita is tied very closely to GDP per capita of the country. So this means these emerging countries could be using multiples of the oil that they use now.

Today, China uses just under six barrels of oil per day for every thousand people. In India, it’s about two and a half barrels for every thousand. In the U.S., it’s just under 70 barrels for every thousand. Even if you figure just a 20% increase in China and India per person – those are huge, huge numbers. China alone has over a billion people. This is going to add tremendous upward pressure on prices.

And of course, I’m sure your readers are aware of the long-term threats to the U.S. dollar. Dollar depreciation will only make the problems I just mentioned that much worse.

That said, in the short term, I think oil is very vulnerable to pullbacks in the general stock market. So we’ve been telling our subscribers to be very cautious. In fact, a year ago, I decided to use $40 oil as the basis for all of our analyses for our newsletter. If a company we were looking at wouldn’t be profitable at $40 oil, then we wouldn’t go any further. The logic behind $40 was to provide a real margin of safety should we get the correction in oil I’m expecting.

But it also pushed me to look a lot deeper and be more selective, and it’s really paid off in our results – over 90% of my recommendations over the last year have delivered significant profits for our subscribers.

The funny thing is that by not using $70 or $80 oil, I started getting hate mail from people, saying, “Don’t you know oil’s at $73 and you’re using $40?” It was hilarious, but that’s exactly my point. If a company cannot be profitable at $40 per barrel of oil, it will underperform its peers even when oil is higher. When I use $40 oil and I like the financials – it’s gold.

A good example of this is what we did with Nexen. When I first wrote it up, it was trading at C$23 per share. After doing my analysis, I thought its intrinsic value was less. I said, “Buy under C$16 per share.” Of course, I got people writing in saying I was out of my mind for setting the buy price so low. Just over a month later, it was trading down below C$16 per share, and my subscribers ended up making about 50% within four months on a low-risk company.

So by using $40 oil, I get my true value, rather than the market value. There’s a difference between intrinsic value and the market value, and I go with intrinsic value. I don’t care what people are paying in the market right now. You might not get it today, you might not get it next week. You have to be patient. It’s what I call “stink bid investing.”

Crux: What else do you look for?

Katusa: Another factor I like to look at is what I call game changers. An example of a game changer is what has recently happened to the natural gas sector in the United States. Companies were victims of their own success, because they were so successful in using new technologies to retrieve gas from the shales, they drove the natural gas price down.

Using advanced technologies to discover big offshore deposits is an example of a game changer in oil. But what you’re going to see is a lot of the big finds are going to be drilled by the major oil companies – what I call the super majors – because it’s just so expensive to drill these targets.

Crux: Nobody else has the money.

Katusa: That’s right. So the only frontiers left for conventional oil production that can be extracted easily and cheaply, like I mentioned before, are in politically unstable countries like Iran, Iraq, Libya.

These countries are fully aware of the potential of their resources locked within their borders. They’re increasing the royalties they charge, including the gradual increase in the use of service fee contracts.

We spent a whole issue talking about this in our Casey Energy Report, in the October issue. In countries where the governments hold the ownership of the oil – such as south central Iraq, Kuwait, even potentially Mexico – these are places that you want to watch out for, because they are constitutionally barred from giving foreign oil companies ownership of the oil in the ground. They’re not as positive as people think they are.

A reliable and friendly oil source to the United States, such as the Alberta oil sands, is not cheap to produce. The oil sands require at least $35-$40 per barrel at the very minimum to extract, compared to less than $5 per barrel in places like Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Kuwait.

Proven reserves in politically stable parts of the world unfortunately will cost the U.S. consumer a lot more money per barrel. We spent a lot of time in our latest issue of Casey’s Energy Opportunities looking at all of the national oil companies. Of those, you’ve really only got three you can possibly invest in, if you dare.

Crux: How about your take on the likelihood of big takeovers and buyouts? Do you see oil-hungry nations like China coming in to buy up a lot of reserves?

Katusa: Absolutely, but it’s not just going to be the Chinese, it’s also going to be big oil companies who want to replace their production with proven reserves in the ground.

An advantage the Chinese companies will have over the Western oil companies is the Chinese ability to leverage their political and economic muscle in places such as Africa, Venezuela, and Bolivia.

These countries potentially hold world-class oil deposits, but it’s much riskier for a Western company to explore these regions than the powerful Chinese oil companies.

Crux: China is already in a bidding war with ExxonMobil for African oil…

Katusa: Right. What our angle is, if you’re looking to invest in Africa, you’re looking for elephant-size deposits – what they call “world class deposits.”

The company needs to go in with a crew able to maneuver in politically unstable parts of the world. We had a big and fast win on a company called Tanganyika Oil, using just that concept. They went in, they built up production, then sold the company to the Chinese.

We’re doing it again right now on a company called Africa Oil – ticker symbol is AOI on the Toronto Venture Exchange – that’s partnering with the Chinese.

The man behind AOI is the same person behind Tanganyika Oil, Lukas Lundin.

Lukas Lundin, like his father before him, has a long record of going into politically unstable parts of the world and succeeding in developing world-class deposits and selling them at huge gains for the investors. So you’re going to see a lot of this type of partnering going on where the Chinese want the North American expertise, and in return, the Chinese add value by political clout and financial clout, helping to pay the costs of development.

We wrote up Africa Oil as a buy under C$1, and when it popped up to about C$1.50, we told our subscribers to take a Casey Free Ride [a profit-taking strategy] when the stock was trading above C$1.30, and it subsequently went as high as C$1.70. Currently we have AOI as a buy under C$1, and it’s trading at C$0.87, which we view as a very cheap cost for this stock.

Crux: Are there any other countries you’re interested in right now? Are you interested in Iraq?

Katusa: In northern Iraq in the Kurdistan region, there are some good onshore blocks with decent royalty rates.

A company called ShaMaran (ticker symbol is SNM on the Venture Exchange) we think has huge potential. It’s totally cashed up. I wrote it up as a buy under C$0.20 and put two buy signals on it. It’s trading at C$0.57 now. It went as high as C$0.80.

And they’ve got about C$0.25 in cash per share. This was a company that was trading less than cash – they had more cash than the market cap. Our shareholders bought millions of shares, because we were the only ones writing it up. And it had zero interest – there was nothing going on with it. And they’re now in northern Iraq in the area of Kurdistan, which has huge, huge potential.

I’ve also been looking at Colombia. I think that’s a country that people have to pay attention to. In the last month, a lot of the smart money, the big, big players in Vancouver – Frank Giustra and Sam Magid – have been putting huge money, their own personal money, into a bunch of oil plays in Colombia. I would recommend your readers take a look at some Colombia plays. One that I really like is Petroamerica, symbol PTA on the Venture Exchange.

Crux: Great. Any parting thoughts?

Katusa: I think what you have to emphasize to people is to buy at a discount to intrinsic value when it’s unpopular, and sell at market value when it’s popular.

That’s not just being a contrarian. A contrarian is just buying something that’s unpopular. Buy something unpopular that has a great discount to its intrinsic value, and when you sell, sell when it’s popular and trading at the market value, not at its intrinsic value. So those are the two rules that I have.

Crux: Thanks for your time.

Katusa: My pleasure.

As mentioned above, Marin’s track record for profiting in resources like crude oil, natural gas, and uranium is unmatched in the industry.

If you’re interested in reading a monthly analysis on the trends and stocks Marin likes, you can get on board as a Casey Energy Opportunities subscriber for only $39 per year. It’s an incredible deal and completely risk-free, with our 3-month, 100% money-back guarantee. You can learn more about a subscription here.

To answer those questions we turn to a report published in late March by UBS energy analyst Jon Rigby and his team in London. Their incredibly useful report is called, “Will there be enough production capacity?” UBS has been battered by its huge sub-prime related losses. But their work on where future oil production will actually come from nearly redeems them. They have asked just the right question at the right time, and answered it in detail.

The report reaches a number of surprising conclusions about the global oil market. It also includes a useful database of oil projects scheduled to enter production in the next five years. These are projects which could add meaningful capacity (100kbpd or more) to global oil production. We’ll look at who stands to benefit in a moment. But first, some of the report’s findings [emphasis added is ours]:

• “Declining existing basins, rising costs, increased technical challenges, stretched supply chains, geopolitical blocks and tightening fiscal terms all seem impediments to growing global production capacity for oil and gas, despite the clear pricing signals.
• “There is no obvious wall of new production coming to the market in response to high prices.”
• New projects scheduled to come on-line from National Oil Companies (NOCs) belong mostly to three major firms: Aramco, Petrobras, and Gazprom.
• New project cost is rising and becoming more technologically challenging, especially deep-water.
• “Nominal growth rates tied to global GDP now look more unrealistic as potential upstream growth slows. This appears reasonably consistent with a growing view that oil production may actually not exceed 100Mbbl/d.”

The idea that global oil production may never exceed 100mbbl/d is worth a much closer look. I’ll get to that later. But before we look at the end, let us look at the beginning of the end and where new production might come from as the world’s oil producers try to bridge the gap between 87mbpd and 117mbpd.

The good news is that there IS new production capacity in the pipeline this year and next. Keep in mind that the final investment decision on the projects entering into production this year was made anywhere from 3-6 years ago. That shows you how far in advance you have to plan for new production (assuming you’ve even found oil in the first place).

There is no such thing as just-in-time oil production. But let’s take a look at projects that will come on line between now and 2010. We’ve selected only those projects that will produce more than 200kbp or more:

If you include LNG and the barrels of oil equivalent produced from it, your list expands a little more to include the following projects:

Beyond 2010, the future is murkier. But the UBS team has identified projects for which the final investment decision has been made. Assuming cost blowouts can be avoided and the projects aren’t cancelled, here are some of the bigger projects that could come on-stream between 2011 and 2015:

There are some massive LNG and natural gas projects coming on-stream between 2011 and 2015. Gazprom, Shell, BP, and ExxonMobil all look like big winners, should oil prices stay high and pass through to higher LNG prices.

The new oil finds off-shore in Brazil’s Santos Basin are not included in the UBS report because they are not likely to enter into production during the next five years. They will be difficult to produce in any event. Petrobras says the Tupi find may contain as many as 8 million barrels, while the Carioca field may have 33 billion barrels of reserves, of which about 10 billion could be recoverable, according to Citigroup.

Current Production Trumps Reserves

One UBS claim which may surprise older oil hands is that, “the capacity to produce—not reserves—is critical to energy markets.” UBS does not conclude that current producers should be valued differently that companies with large reserves but current production challenges. But it’s worth thinking about.