An interview with Marin Katusa, Casey Research

In the past three years, Marin Katusa, senior energy analyst at Casey Research, has become one of the most respected and listened-to authorities in the investment advisory business. He spends the bulk of his time on airplanes and in far-off places studying the future of energy… and the best ways to make money from it.

Brian Hunt, editor in chief of Stansberry’s free online investment digest, The Daily Crux, interviewed Marin to get his take on where oil prices are headed for the long-term… the regions where investors and traders should focus their dollars… and some of his favorite energy companies with massive upside.

The Daily Crux: Marin… we noticed you guys at Casey Research are bullish on energy. Can you explain to us why?

Marin Katusa: Well, as we’ve mentioned in our Casey Energy letters, we’re short-term bears but long-term bulls.

I think there’s a very good chance oil will be knocked back down along with other markets in the short term, but I’d consider that a rare opportunity to buy the best companies at a steep discount. Long term, I’m very bullish on oil because I think the supply of cheap oil is running out.

The days of cheap and easy oil are over. Oil is getting harder and harder to extract because most of the easy-to-find deposits have already been found and extracted.

The best remaining deposits are deep underwater like in the Gulf of Mexico or offshore of Brazil, in state-controlled or politically unstable areas like Iran and Venezuela, or experiencing dramatically falling production like Mexico. There are also huge oil-sands deposits in Canada, but these are more expensive to extract – anywhere from $35-$40 per barrel for existing production, up to $65 or more for new production.

The simple fact is oil prices will eventually rise due to the increased costs involved in meeting existing demand.

On top of that, you’ve got developing countries beginning to significantly increase their own demand. Right now, you’ve got just 30 or so of the world’s most developed countries, known as the OECD, that consume about half of all the oil produced.

As emerging countries like China and India begin to increase their standard of living, they’ll start using a lot more oil. As you guys know, oil consumption per capita is tied very closely to GDP per capita of the country. So this means these emerging countries could be using multiples of the oil that they use now.

Today, China uses just under six barrels of oil per day for every thousand people. In India, it’s about two and a half barrels for every thousand. In the U.S., it’s just under 70 barrels for every thousand. Even if you figure just a 20% increase in China and India per person – those are huge, huge numbers. China alone has over a billion people. This is going to add tremendous upward pressure on prices.

And of course, I’m sure your readers are aware of the long-term threats to the U.S. dollar. Dollar depreciation will only make the problems I just mentioned that much worse.

That said, in the short term, I think oil is very vulnerable to pullbacks in the general stock market. So we’ve been telling our subscribers to be very cautious. In fact, a year ago, I decided to use $40 oil as the basis for all of our analyses for our newsletter. If a company we were looking at wouldn’t be profitable at $40 oil, then we wouldn’t go any further. The logic behind $40 was to provide a real margin of safety should we get the correction in oil I’m expecting.

But it also pushed me to look a lot deeper and be more selective, and it’s really paid off in our results – over 90% of my recommendations over the last year have delivered significant profits for our subscribers.

The funny thing is that by not using $70 or $80 oil, I started getting hate mail from people, saying, “Don’t you know oil’s at $73 and you’re using $40?” It was hilarious, but that’s exactly my point. If a company cannot be profitable at $40 per barrel of oil, it will underperform its peers even when oil is higher. When I use $40 oil and I like the financials – it’s gold.

A good example of this is what we did with Nexen. When I first wrote it up, it was trading at C$23 per share. After doing my analysis, I thought its intrinsic value was less. I said, “Buy under C$16 per share.” Of course, I got people writing in saying I was out of my mind for setting the buy price so low. Just over a month later, it was trading down below C$16 per share, and my subscribers ended up making about 50% within four months on a low-risk company.

So by using $40 oil, I get my true value, rather than the market value. There’s a difference between intrinsic value and the market value, and I go with intrinsic value. I don’t care what people are paying in the market right now. You might not get it today, you might not get it next week. You have to be patient. It’s what I call “stink bid investing.”

Crux: What else do you look for?

Katusa: Another factor I like to look at is what I call game changers. An example of a game changer is what has recently happened to the natural gas sector in the United States. Companies were victims of their own success, because they were so successful in using new technologies to retrieve gas from the shales, they drove the natural gas price down.

Using advanced technologies to discover big offshore deposits is an example of a game changer in oil. But what you’re going to see is a lot of the big finds are going to be drilled by the major oil companies – what I call the super majors – because it’s just so expensive to drill these targets.

Crux: Nobody else has the money.

Katusa: That’s right. So the only frontiers left for conventional oil production that can be extracted easily and cheaply, like I mentioned before, are in politically unstable countries like Iran, Iraq, Libya.

These countries are fully aware of the potential of their resources locked within their borders. They’re increasing the royalties they charge, including the gradual increase in the use of service fee contracts.

We spent a whole issue talking about this in our Casey Energy Report, in the October issue. In countries where the governments hold the ownership of the oil – such as south central Iraq, Kuwait, even potentially Mexico – these are places that you want to watch out for, because they are constitutionally barred from giving foreign oil companies ownership of the oil in the ground. They’re not as positive as people think they are.

A reliable and friendly oil source to the United States, such as the Alberta oil sands, is not cheap to produce. The oil sands require at least $35-$40 per barrel at the very minimum to extract, compared to less than $5 per barrel in places like Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Kuwait.

Proven reserves in politically stable parts of the world unfortunately will cost the U.S. consumer a lot more money per barrel. We spent a lot of time in our latest issue of Casey’s Energy Opportunities looking at all of the national oil companies. Of those, you’ve really only got three you can possibly invest in, if you dare.

Crux: How about your take on the likelihood of big takeovers and buyouts? Do you see oil-hungry nations like China coming in to buy up a lot of reserves?

Katusa: Absolutely, but it’s not just going to be the Chinese, it’s also going to be big oil companies who want to replace their production with proven reserves in the ground.

An advantage the Chinese companies will have over the Western oil companies is the Chinese ability to leverage their political and economic muscle in places such as Africa, Venezuela, and Bolivia.

These countries potentially hold world-class oil deposits, but it’s much riskier for a Western company to explore these regions than the powerful Chinese oil companies.

Crux: China is already in a bidding war with ExxonMobil for African oil…

Katusa: Right. What our angle is, if you’re looking to invest in Africa, you’re looking for elephant-size deposits – what they call “world class deposits.”

The company needs to go in with a crew able to maneuver in politically unstable parts of the world. We had a big and fast win on a company called Tanganyika Oil, using just that concept. They went in, they built up production, then sold the company to the Chinese.

We’re doing it again right now on a company called Africa Oil – ticker symbol is AOI on the Toronto Venture Exchange – that’s partnering with the Chinese.

The man behind AOI is the same person behind Tanganyika Oil, Lukas Lundin.

Lukas Lundin, like his father before him, has a long record of going into politically unstable parts of the world and succeeding in developing world-class deposits and selling them at huge gains for the investors. So you’re going to see a lot of this type of partnering going on where the Chinese want the North American expertise, and in return, the Chinese add value by political clout and financial clout, helping to pay the costs of development.

We wrote up Africa Oil as a buy under C$1, and when it popped up to about C$1.50, we told our subscribers to take a Casey Free Ride [a profit-taking strategy] when the stock was trading above C$1.30, and it subsequently went as high as C$1.70. Currently we have AOI as a buy under C$1, and it’s trading at C$0.87, which we view as a very cheap cost for this stock.

Crux: Are there any other countries you’re interested in right now? Are you interested in Iraq?

Katusa: In northern Iraq in the Kurdistan region, there are some good onshore blocks with decent royalty rates.

A company called ShaMaran (ticker symbol is SNM on the Venture Exchange) we think has huge potential. It’s totally cashed up. I wrote it up as a buy under C$0.20 and put two buy signals on it. It’s trading at C$0.57 now. It went as high as C$0.80.

And they’ve got about C$0.25 in cash per share. This was a company that was trading less than cash – they had more cash than the market cap. Our shareholders bought millions of shares, because we were the only ones writing it up. And it had zero interest – there was nothing going on with it. And they’re now in northern Iraq in the area of Kurdistan, which has huge, huge potential.

I’ve also been looking at Colombia. I think that’s a country that people have to pay attention to. In the last month, a lot of the smart money, the big, big players in Vancouver – Frank Giustra and Sam Magid – have been putting huge money, their own personal money, into a bunch of oil plays in Colombia. I would recommend your readers take a look at some Colombia plays. One that I really like is Petroamerica, symbol PTA on the Venture Exchange.

Crux: Great. Any parting thoughts?

Katusa: I think what you have to emphasize to people is to buy at a discount to intrinsic value when it’s unpopular, and sell at market value when it’s popular.

That’s not just being a contrarian. A contrarian is just buying something that’s unpopular. Buy something unpopular that has a great discount to its intrinsic value, and when you sell, sell when it’s popular and trading at the market value, not at its intrinsic value. So those are the two rules that I have.

Crux: Thanks for your time.

Katusa: My pleasure.

As mentioned above, Marin’s track record for profiting in resources like crude oil, natural gas, and uranium is unmatched in the industry.

If you’re interested in reading a monthly analysis on the trends and stocks Marin likes, you can get on board as a Casey Energy Opportunities subscriber for only $39 per year. It’s an incredible deal and completely risk-free, with our 3-month, 100% money-back guarantee. You can learn more about a subscription here.

Let’s make some trades this morning. We asked Rick Rule, a living legend here in Vancouver, what’s the next bubble market?
“The Canadian market does not care about small oil and gas companies,” he told us yesterday. “Which means that small Canadian O&G companies are selling for 50-60% of net asset value. They are very, very, very cheap. They are unloved, with no finance options and no trading liquidity… and I love that. This value is free. There will be much money made in small-cap Canadian energy.

“But that will pale in comparison to alternative energy. This is what investors need to pay attention to. There is money to be made in solar, wind, even something as stupid as biofuels. Alt energy is now politically and socially correct. It has the full backing of the U.S. government.

“I would encourage you to look at small hydro and geothermal. The others have problems. Solar has one big problem — night. Wind doesn’t always blow either, and people don’t like to live places where the wind blows all the time. You might make money in solar and wind, because government likes it, but I don’t have the courage to buy a biz that’s success is determined by the Governator.

“Geothermal is always there. It is spectacular. So is hydro. In the short, medium and long term, you will all turn out to be happy. They are the uranium of this generation. I think we are on the verge of an incredible mania in alt energy.”

Which specific geo and hydro businesses? Rick has named company after company after company to our attendees at this year’s Investment Symposium. We’ve recorded nearly every second of his presentations and recommendations… you can hear them too with the Symposium CD/MP3 set.
“The world’s biggest energy player has thrown $600 million into a research partnership to study algae oil’s potential,” reports Greg Guenthner in a similar vein. Not coincidentally, we’ve heard several Symposium speakers mention this exact transaction. “Exxon Mobil and human genome researcher Craig Venter have teamed up in an attempt to make algae oil a viable fuel source.

“‘There has been so much hype and hope about the potential for algae that this announcement should act as a reality check for everyone,’ Venter told the Financial Times.

“Of course, this new partnership does not mean we will be filling our tanks with pond scum biodiesel just yet. Developers will still need to tackle genetic engineering and oil extraction issues…

”But Exxon Mobil’s leap into the algae oil market effectively legitimizes the industry.”

Want Greg’s microcap algae play? Check it out here, along with the rest of his Bulletin Board Elite portfolio.
Of course, alt energy is dead to Wall Street (all the more reason to buy). For the last two weeks, surprise blue chip earnings anouncements have led the market up, and today is no exception. Better-than-expected earnings from AT&T and 3M are in the spotlight today, and the S&P is up 2% as we write.
Hell, even The New York Times is making money again.The Old Gray Lady earned almost $40 million in the second quarter, the paper reported this morning. The NYT pulled it off by jettisoning staff and cutting opperating costs by 20%… and there was this little “favorable tax adjustment” that boosted earnings by $37 million.
Exisiting home sales rose for the third straight month in June, the National Association of Realtors says today, adding to the buying frenzy. Sales of previously owned homes inched up 3.6%.

“We have finally bottomed out,” PNC’s chief economist told Bloomberg. Heh, we’ve got a fine bridge to sell that fellow…

Best we can tell, the market-clearing process is still chugging along. Of all the sales in June, 31% were distressed. Prices are still plunging — the median price is down 15% from the same time last year, to $181,000. There is a still a historically high 9.4-month supply of exisiting homes on the market. Is that what a bottom looks like to you?
Not to mention, the job market still stinks. This morning, the government said there were 554,000 initial jobless claims last week. That’s off crisis highs of over 600,000, but obviously not by much. Continuing claims rang in around 6.2 million.
“Chicken sales will probably lead unemployment numbers as an economic indicator out of the recession,”writes our resource man Alan Knuckman, just back from annual National Chicken Council conference (sounds like a real hoot!). “Chicken growth has slowed with the toughening economic conditions, but still is three times that of beef. Restaurants and home consumers have seen a shift in protein demand and replacement with chicken or other chicken parts.

“These guys do volume because people love chicken to the tune of over 700 million pounds a week, with per capita consumption now at 86 pounds per year. In fact, consumption has quadrupled in the last 40 years and doubled in the last 20. BSBM — boneless, skinless breast meat — has paved the way for growth, but now dark meat is making a move as consumers cut food costs.

“Now, all this chicken talk is fun and interesting, but how does this make us money? BRIC consumers (Brazil, Russia, India and China) all have expanding middle-class populations that are now in the position to buy better food. Not fancy cars or electronics, but simply better protein to feed themselves and their families.

“Here in the United States, there is a 0.95 correlation between chicken consumption and income and personal consumption expenditures. More money to spend means more chicken bought. As others have their incomes rise worldwide, those citizens can add more meat to their diets.

“This growth will put tremendous upside pressure on the base inputs: commodities, which are used to feed, process and transport the protein of chicken, beef, pork and even farmed fish. Protein is what’s for dinner, and the U.S. is serving the rest of the world.

“The income growth in underdeveloped countries will continue to put our farmers in the leadership position to deliver. Plus, all along the way, we’ll be ready to profit here at Resource Trader Alert.”

If you want to trade this trend, you’ve got to check out Alan’s latest report on his “no-brainier” trading strategy.
The 2011 state budget crisis has already begun. You likely read the headlines last week, that state governments around the country were able to close $142 billion worth of budget gaps for the 2010 fiscal year. Well, according to the latest from the Center for Budget Policy and Priorites, 12 states and D.C. are already facing new budget gaps totalling $23 billion.
That’s not great for the ol’ U.S. dollar, nor is today’s stock rally. The dollar index is down to a fresh six-week low of 78.5.
What would be the best way to get money and yourself out of the country if there is a sudden collapse in the U.S. dollar? That question was posed last night to our Whiskey Bar panel — one of the highlights of the Symposium thus far. We managed to round up our most opinionated, venom-spitting editors for a panel discussion — Doug Casey, Chris Mayer, Eric Fry, Byron King, James Howard Kunstler, Gary Gibson, Patrick Cox and Barry Ritholtz. There’s no way to paraphrase a group like that, so here’s a snippet:

Casey: “It is still possible to send all the money you want out of the country… very possible to buy real estate. I bet in two years, it will be a problem to do both. I think the fuse is getting really short. Once you send it out of the country, buy something like real estate. My two favorites are Argentina and Thailand. I think Argentina is about to change radically, like New Zealand in the ’80s.”

King: “You need to start wrapping your brain around this. When I was in South Africa, I was told by this old Dutchman — and now I really don’t mean to offend anyone, this is just what he said — when the Jews leave, it’s time to leave. When the Portuguese leave, it’s too late.”

Ritholtz: “Keep your boat fully fueled and get ready to sail… pretty safe out there. I don’t think it’ll be an ongoing firestorm. You’ll just need a place to lay out for a week while the worst of it passes.”

Kunstler: “It’s important for those in business leadership to start thinking about defending your country and doing things that make this culture better. We have no time to be crybabies. Just too much to do to get this country back together again.” (Spontaneous applause.)

Gibson: “I’m looking to get work on Bill Bonner’s ranch.”

The event likely peaked when Doug Casey called everyone in the room “whipped dogs that roll over and wet themselves” whenever they’re scolded. Evidently, he was upset there was no gunpowder or tobacco allowed at an event sponsored by Whiskey & Gunpowder. Heh. For more from Doug, be sure to check out his presentation in the Symposium CD/MP3 set.
With that in mind, one last note — a genuine tragedy: The Brits are taxing one of their few national treasures into extinction:

As if the legnedary British watering hole didn’t have enough head winds — smoking ban, the recession, etc. — the Economist reports that recent tax hikes on booze are causing over 50 pubs to close every week. Taxes on a pint were around 8 pence 30 years ago… they are 38 pence today. Maybe it’s just the reminants of last night’s Whiskey Bar still in our bloodstream, but what a shame!
“Your reader who was looking at Florida real estate hit the nail on the head,” writes another reader. “My wife and I also went last year to Florida to look at ‘super’ deals and foreclosures and short sales. We concentrated in the Palm Coast area and learned that most banks had stopped foreclosing and were doing all things possible to help short sellers (except take less than what was owed by any great degree). The banks realized that if they foreclosed, THEY would now have to pay the taxes, upkeep, etc. on the properties, and, even in the case of condos, maintenance fees or dues!

“Most of the properties we looked at were in the $300,000-600,000 price range, and, as a result, had taxes of $6,000-7,000 and maintenance fees of nearly equal cost! Ouch! We too have decided to rent — unless you live there at least six months out of the year, it doesn’t pay to ‘own,’ and even then it may not.”

Source:  The Next Bubble, The Chicken Indicator, Surviving the Worst Case Scenario and More!

With the “not-as-bad-as-expected” news surrounding the economy and the initial government stimulus measures have been priced in to the market, we are moving into a period of profound uncertainty. With the release of Alcoa Inc.’s (NYSE: AA) earnings report, earnings season has officially begun.

In most cases each company’s own “easy” restructurings are also behind us.  They have resorted to massive lay-offs and inventory liquidations to bring costs down to the bare minimum required to run their respective businesses.  Those cuts and gained efficiencies also have been priced in.  Now, it is time for these companies to show what they can do organically.

Energy companies appear to have hit a wall now that China has run out of space to store oil. And other commodities businesses are suffering, too, as the U.S. Federal Reserve seems to have found religion and veered toward a much more prudent monetary policy.

After its last meeting the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) signaled the end of quantitative easing, at least for the foreseeable future.  This is of paramount importance, because it seems to be a concession to those who worried that the Fed might debase the U.S. dollar with by over-expanding its balance sheet and fanning inflationary forces down the road.

The Fed has done a tremendous job of first restoring some sense of “normalcy” and confidence in the core markets, like interbank lending and money markets, and then proceeding to work outwards to U.S. Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities.  This later step towards more prudent actions is welcome and you are seeing it in the U.S. dollar and renewed confidence in Treasuries.  The latter have been received extremely well by investors and yields have started to move down, reflecting not only the lack of current inflation, but also the confidence that the Fed will not go bananas with quantitative easing.

So, ahead of a very difficult earnings season, I am not going to try to out-predict the market.  The experts have been going around for a couple of months trying to just that by using expensive consultants that do channel-checking and by contacting the companies themselves to clarify statements made under full disclosure.

But the earnings season has extraordinary challenges to surmount, that are deriving from the uncertainty that is hanging over the markets like the proverbial sword of Damocles.

General Motors Corp. (OTC: GMGMQ) and Chrysler Group LLC are emerging from bankruptcy in record time and their costs, debt and massive corporate restructurings will probably make them internationally competitive once more.  But there are still questions about how these companies will cope with the still dormant auto market.

The outlook for the large financial behemoths that are due report earnings is equally uncertain. We still need to see how these institutions play around with their toxic asset valuations, their loan loss reserves and their predictions for the future, particularly given the potential stumbling blocks on the road to recovery.

The three obstacles that I find especially troubling are:

1. The spike in credit card delinquencies.
2. The outlook for commercial real estate.
3. And the pending second wave of residential foreclosures, now in the prime and option-ARM sectors.

But do not discount the possibility of seeing mark-ups in toxic asset valuations that might favor some financials strongly.

Now, with the Fed seemingly on hold and the U.S. government’s stimuli only 30% deployed and showing little traction, where is the growth going to come from, especially since unemployment blew right through the promised 8% peak to the current level of 9.5%? On top of that, last week’s rise in continuing jobless claims and Friday’s drop in consumer sentiment offered little solace.

The good news in all of this is that savings rates spiked to 7% as consumers used their money to pay down debt.  Even though this improvement in consumers’ balance sheets does not show in immediate sales growth, it bodes very well for the future.  And this savings trend, which translates into reduced demand for imported consumer products, together with rising exports, resulted in the lowest trade deficit in nearly a decade.

We are making the difficult progress that we need to make in order to restore the U.S. economy to financial health, and that, in turn, is helping the dollar and Treasuries in the short term.

So, based on these massive uncertainties, waiting to be played out, the best risk-reward ratio appears to be in bonds.  With a massive U.S. Treasury supply well absorbed, we are going to jump into long term U.S. Treasuries for a conservative upside, while we keep waiting for resolution on the healthcare reform, social security, and corporate earnings.

Recommendation: Buy the iShares Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSE: TLT) (**).

(**) - Special Note of Disclosure: Horacio Marquez holds no interest in the iShares Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

Source: Buy, Sell or Hold: Buy iShares Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF For Solid Profit at a Time of Great Uncertainty ]]> http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/buy-sell-or-hold-buy-ishares-barclays-20-year-treasury-bond-etf-for-solid-profit-at-a-time-of-great-uncertainty/19017/feed 0 http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/wall-st-falls-on-economic-worries/18152 http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/wall-st-falls-on-economic-worries/18152#comments Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:00:39 +0000 Contrarian Profits http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=18152 U.S. stocks slid on Monday as investors questioned the strength of an economic recovery, while energy shares were dragged down by lower oil prices. After a sharp three-month rally, indexes have eased as traders increasingly questioned if stocks are due for a correction.

Worries that the economic recovery could be tepid have wilted the optimism that drove the S&P 500 up by as much as 40 percent from the 12-year low in March.

Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM) and Chevron Corp (CVX) were the biggest drags on the Dow as the price of oil fell below $68 a barrel on the stronger dollar. Exxon was down 2 percent to $69.61, while Chevron fell 2.5 percent to $66.34.

While higher oil prices can be a boon for energy companies,…

As prices have recently touched lows of $33.20 per barrel, inexpensive oil has caused severe problems for Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez and Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Chavez just invited oil companies Chevron (NYSE: CVX), Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE: RDS.A) and Total S.A. (NYSE: TOT) back into the country. And Ahmadinejad is fighting re-election troubles caused by a government used to surpluses and excess cash.

Apparently inefficient state-run energy companies can’t squeeze out profits like the professionals. And when they aren’t screwing production up, Russia has proven that it can simultaneously show the world it’s a bully – in addition to cutting off it’s income stream.

And things certainly don’t seem to be getting any better for these three. OPEC just released its 2009 demand forecast that spells out a dismal outlook for the coming year. But it’s not just low demand.

Oil inventories are at all time highs, “contango” opportunities abound, and OPEC hasn’t cut production anywhere near to where it needs to be to level out prices. And even if it did, the “bad boys,” mentioned above, would still be pumping it out at full speed to meet their obligations.

Lets fact it, oil could be down for much longer than they expect.

Source: Oil – U.S. State Department’s Newest Ally

Today, 88 businesses qualify for this exemption under the government’s rules. They are all publicly traded. The government calls these stocks “master limited partnerships” (MLPs) or “publicly traded partnerships” (PTPs).

Eighty-five percent of MLPs are in the energy business. Two-thirds of these energy companies operate pipelines. The rest run miscellaneous “midstream” energy businesses – things like refining, compressing, pumping, and field gathering. Only 15% of MLPs are outside the energy sector.

You likely know several MLPs already. Kinder Morgan used to be part of Enron. It’s an MLP. And though you’ve probably heard of Blackstone Group and its private-equity operations, you may not know Blackstone is also structured as an MLP. Carl Icahn’s business – Icahn Enterprises – is an MLP, too. (For a full list of MLPs, see the website of the National Association of Publicly Traded Partnerships at www.naptp.org.)

I like MLPs as an investment. One of the secrets of income investing is avoiding tax. When you avoid tax, you generate higher returns without taking on more risk. Besides, MLPs invest in infrastructure. The population of the United States grows every year. Population growth supports 8% average annual MLP market growth.

But here’s the thing: I think MLPs are going to beat almost all other income investments over the next two years for another reason altogether:

Canada.

The income-trust market in Canada is almost identical to the MLP sector in the United States. Canadian income trusts pay no tax, they distribute all their earnings in dividends, and they operate mostly in the commodity and energy sectors.

In other words, MLPs compete directly with Canadian income trusts for investment.

Millions of income investors, pension funds, retirees, and other dividend hogs have enjoyed these trusts’ high dividends over the last 20 years.

But on October 31, 2006, the Canadian government changed the law. It ended the Canadian income-trust structure. Existing trusts have until January 1, 2011 to convert back to corporations, begin paying corporate taxes again, and cut their dividends.

MLPs are the perfect substitute. Yield hogs will turn their attention to MLPs as the 2011 deadline approaches.

Right now, MLPs are paying 7.4%. A 10-year Treasury note pays only 4%. The “spread,” or difference, is 3.4%. This spread is the largest it’s been in five years. That means MLPs are as cheap as they’ve been since 2003.

North American Pipeline MLP Yields Versus
10-Year Treasury Bonds

If nothing changes, MLPs will keep generating 7.4% dividend yields. Add that to 8% industry growth, and we’ll make total annual returns of 16% – matching returns of the last 18 years.

But when you take into account the demise of the Canadian income trusts… I think MLP investors could easily see 25% annual returns over the next couple of years.

Good investing,

Tom

P.S. I’ve found the best way to invest in MLPs. It’s a basket of these investments, it pays a 6.5% dividend yield… and you can buy it at a discount to its net asset value. Here’s something else: You won’t have to worry about tax paperwork associated with MLPs because the SEC considers this investment a regular stock for tax purposes…

I recently published a report on this investment for readers of my advisory The 12% Letter. Click here to learn more about The 12% Letter.

Source: Canada’s Loss Will Make These U.S. Stocks Soar

 Three stocks just executed stocks splits in May — all of which should be part of your portfolio.

Petroleo Brasileiro (PBR: NYSE)

PBR engages in the exploration, development and production of oil, liquefied natural gas, and natural gas in Brazil. It’s quickly emerging as one of the world’s top oil and energy companies. Petrobras split 2- for- 1 on May 8.

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF: NYSE)

CLF is a mining company that produces iron ore pellets and supplies metallurgical coal to the steelmaking industry in North America. So long as steel demand remains hot, shares of CLF will continue to rise. Cleveland-Cliffs split 2- for- 1 on May 16.

Union Pacific Corp. (UNP: NYSE)

With high gas prices crippling the trucking industry, Union Pacific’s 32,205 rail miles linking the Pacific and Gulf c oasts with the M idwestern and eastern United States offers a strong investment thesis. UNP shares split 2- for- 1 on May 29 .

Based on my experience with stock splits, all three will continue moving higher. I consider all three names strong buys at current levels.

Sincerely,

Bryan Bottarelli, Bottarelli Research

NEVER BEFORE REVEALED…

A Newspaper Reporter Making $15,000 Per Year Used These Secrets to Compile a $50 Million Net-Worth.

- Source: 60 Minutes

Next Week, You Could Make $35,000 in 10 Minutes.

Source: Three Bullish Plays 

But have no fear.

It’s not too late to grab a piece of the pie.

The trick is that you’ll have to look beyond the obvious choices like major oil companies, drillers and other sectors that are hopelessly bid up right now. And you can play various types of funds, as well as stocks, as we’ll demonstrate.

The Four Factors Giving Life to the Commodity Bull

But before we tackle the how, let’s tackle the why:

• First, it’s important to understand that high oil prices are simply going to go higher, still. There will be inevitable pullbacks, but as we’ve written so many times in the past, the math is very simple – people are simply using more oil than at any time in history and worldwide demand is accelerating.

• Second, it’s also important to note that we haven’t had a major new discovery of any substantial size in the last 30 years. And by substantial, we mean big enough to change the balance of supply and demand and, by implication, to reverse the runaway increase in prices. The lack of any new discoveries, then, also points to higher prices.

• Third, absent an immediate, cost-effective and widely available substitute, oil is increasingly nationalistic in nature. This means that oil producers – and particularly the tyrants with spigots – will begin holding back production for their own use. That will reduce the supply available on world markets, further enhancing the upward pricing pressure.

• And fourth, while higher prices are finally inducing some drivers in modern industrialized countries to drive less, developing nations don’t give damn about conservation and are guzzling gasoline like there’s no tomorrow – which, for them, is entirely true. For these nations, access to energy and to petroleum is the literal equivalent to survival and they’ll do everything they can to ensure it. So any drop in demand we’re experiencing is almost immediately offset by higher consumption in such markets as China, India and many parts of South America. And that offsetting consumption may well persist for years.

That’s a very painful reality to face. But it does bring us to the fun part of this commentary: The profits.

New Markets = New Profit Opportunities

Any time you have sustained supply-and-demand imbalances, you also the potential for huge profits. And what’s happening now is no different.

Viewed in that light, higher oil prices can actually be a good thing for the stock markets, just as the rising price of such “commodities” as gold, copper, cotton, silk and spices have been for various nations since the dawn of time.

The reason is that excess profits that would ordinarily flow to Caracas, Moscow and Riyadh, are being recycled into the best global stocks on the best first-tier global stock exchanges, including the New York Stock Exchange, the Tokyo and Hong Kong stock exchanges, and the Frankfurt, Euronext and London exchanges.

But that may be coming to a head as trillions of dollars are chasing a diminishing number of high-quality stocks, which over time will propel those shares to excessively high valuation levels.

So what’s an investor to do? Savvy investors will once again have to go with the (global money) flow, ferreting out markets that haven’t yet hit “mainstream” radar screens, but that still are likely to benefit from rising oil prices.

We refer to them as “frontier” markets and they include such mineral- and resource-rich places as Nigeria, Sudan, Egypt and Bangladesh among others. They’re obviously beyond the same old BRIC choices that have become so popular in recent years.

Most of these markets are so small that many investors overlook them altogether – but they’ll soon become very popular because of the tremendous upside they offer.

Even with political upheaval, hyperinflation, open warfare and catastrophic human and natural disasters, frontier markets are piling on stunning returns. Most are benefiting significantly from rising commodity prices that, in turn, produce higher corporate profits.

As a case in point, consider the Standard & Poor’s/IFCG Frontier Markets Composite Index posted a mouth watering 43.3% return last year. And individual markets did even better. Bangladesh turned in 128.3% while Cote d’Ivoire nailed down a 122.7% gain. The index’s worst performer, Estonia, plunged -14.2%.

Clearly with a range like that, so-called frontier markets aren’t for everybody especially since they’ve gotten so expensive as more money has flowed into them. Data shows that many are trading at Price/Earnings (P/E) ratios that range from a high of nearly 100 for Vietnam to a “mere” 35.9 in Slovenia.

Still, even at these valuations, we can make the case that higher commodity prices will allow these markets to grow for years to come – especially given that they are starting from such a small base.

Which makes them a logical choice for adventurous investors who want to get in before they become hot on the country club cocktail circuit.

Crude prices jumped on Monday in electronic trading as news of the attack broke, but analysts said the impact on prices spilled over into Tuesday, when exchanges on both side of the Atlantic re-opened after the long weekend.

“Is it demand? Is it speculation? Is it OPEC punishing George Bush for the war in Iraq?” asks Dan Denning in The Daily Reckoning Australia. “OPEC thinks there’s plenty of oil. It’s the declining U.S. dollar that’s to blame. OPEC says that for every one percent decline in the dollar oil rises by US$4, and vice versa.

“The solution to high oil prices, then, is not increased supply or reduced demand, but a stronger U.S. dollar! Well, there is certainly some truth to that, but it is not likely to happen any time soon. As a tangible good whose supply cannot be increased by a central banker, the oil price (a little like the gold price) tells you there’s too much paper money chasing too little stuff.”

Alexander Green in Investment U has identified a new, highly profitable oil source: “Alberta’s oil sands are the largest known reserve of oil on earth, containing between 1.7 and 2.5 trillion barrels. (Saudi Arabia, by comparison, has only 262 billion barrels of proven reserves. In fact, all OPEC nations combined have less than 900 billion barrels.) For decades, these sands weren’t even considered part of the world’s oil reserves because the oil there wasn’t economically extractible at prevailing prices using then-current technology.

“But times have changed… And the new gold rush is on.

“In Alberta’s oil sands, energy companies don’t drill for oil. They dig it up. After excavation, giant trucks three stories high – carrying up to 400 tons of oil sands – carry it off to a processing plant.”

Read on here to find out how to cash in on the tar-sands “black gold” rush with this oil mining company.

“If oil prices keep going up, it is simply not in any country’s best interest to keep subsidizing these prices indefinitely,” says Peter Gastreich, a UBS oil and gas analyst, in the Financial Times. More from that story:

The recent surge in the price of oil has been particularly painful for Asian oil importers such as India, where imports cover 73 per cent of petroleum needs. But it has also deprived state energy companies of additional revenues to make bigger investments in exploration, as well as downstream infrastructure.

Analysts warned that planned cuts in subsidies and controls would have to be followed by more substantial energy market deregulation.

The Chinese government said that stock market rumors of an imminent increase in domestic fuel prices were “groundless”. However, analysts forecast that Beijing would eventually endorse subsidy cuts.

“The story of oil is no longer a U.S.-centric story,” says Chris Mayer in The Daily Reckoning. “China and India are only beginning to consume oil at any meaningful level. Right now, they are consuming oil at a rate the U.S. did in the early years of the 20th century.

“But look, we don’t need China to start guzzling oil like we do. Even if it moves half the distance between it and Hong Kong, that’s a lot of extra demand. The way I look at it is this: What’s more likely, China stays at 1910 oil usage or moves somewhere closer to, say, 1950s U.S. oil usage? I think the latter.”

Jason Simpkins in Money Morning says: “Every investor must have a China strategy. And that also holds true for the energy sector.

Read on here for a long-term play on both China and on oil prices. Jason reckons investors with the patience to let such a strategy play out may find this a profitable pick.