With the nation’s unemployment rate officially in double-digit territory and the under-employed rate ready to the 20% mark, the politicians that promised bliss in the days ahead are eating their words today.

And that means Wall Street is eating its recent gains.

For nearly a month, the Dow has hovered around the 10,000 mark. After hundreds of billions of dollars were withdrawn earlier this year, it was relatively easy to put that money back to work and send the equities market higher.

But now that the economic data is showing facts of slower-than-expected expansion rather than “ideas” of growth, investors are forced to explain their logic. The Dow doesn’t want to budge from 10k.

So far, I’ve heard very few reasons for prices to go any higher. Maybe in China or Australia, but certainly not here in the land where everything is changing.

Think about what has occurred over the past twelve months and tell me if you believe today’s companies are worth as much as they were two years ago or even five years ago.

We’ve had government takeovers of major banks, mortgage lenders, auto manufacturers and insurers. Washington has told people how much they can make in a year. Legislators even introduced retroactive taxes.

Then there is the threat of cap and trade blowing energy prices (an input to nearly every American business) sky high. Now it is mandatory healthcare and the risk to corporate payrolls, tax structures and discretionary spending.

After all that, I hate to think about what is next. An assault on allergens?

*** Maybe I’m just being too pessimistic. After all it has been a long week and I spent five hours at the airport in the middle of the night yesterday waiting to pick up my mother-in-law.

Don’t get me wrong. I think there are some fantastic buying opportunities out there. There are just not in the places most Americans are looking.

But since the mother-in-law brought me eighty pounds of fresh Alaskan salmon, halibut and moose meat (she’s as close to Sarah Palin as you can get without committing to Playgirl), I am starting to feel a bit generous today.

That means I’m going to share with you what I am certain will be the biggest gainers of the next twelve months.

First… healthcare. Think about it. Who is easier to rip off than the federal government?

Just ask Haliburton, Goldman Sachs and whoever sold those $750 toilet seats.

Within a year of signing some diluted version of Pelosi-care, the headlines are going to be filled with record-breaking profits out of the nation’s largest healthcare providers and drug companies.

If Wall Street has the nerve to toss out billions in bonuses while the ink on their bailout checks is still drying, imagine the kind of zeroes that will be added to the paychecks of healthcare executives.

I can hear the excuses now. “If we want to save lives, we have to retain the best workers.”

It is going to be a feeding frenzy when Uncle Sam is the third-party payer.

Next, forget about gold.

One reader wrote to me yesterday and said, “I think it will hit $2,000, but it will probably hit $600 first.”

Could not have said it better myself. Gold’s value is too tied up with political moves and currency fluctuations. With one well-timed press release, China can send the price wherever the heck it wants.

I don’t want my wealth facing that kind of risk, especially after we just rammed Beijing with the largest tariffs yet.

That’s why my money is on palladium. It’s much harder to find and has a huge industrial demand.

Palladium is at the heart of the world’s commodity carry trade. I told TFN Strategic Traders to play Stillwater Mining several months ago and the trade nearly doubled in a week. It is still a good buy, especially as China’s auto industry takes shape.

Finally, go short on natural gas. Get as much leverage as you can because prices are about to plummet fast.

On Wednesday, the International Energy Agency was one of the first major groups to back my opinion. In a draft of a report due out next week, the influential group warned of a massive glut of natural gas as global demand begins to top off and turn around just as we are pulling more of the stuff out of the ground than ever.

But don’t wait until Tuesday to read the report. You can read my version right now. In it, I recommend three ways to play the situation.

So far, two of the plays would have already doubled your money. All three are well into positive territory. Prices are almost out of my buying range, so do not hesitate to take action.

*** Before I go for the week, I need to make a correction. Yesterday, I inadvertently said the Senate extended unemployment benefits for 14 months. The actual extension is 14 weeks.

I apologize for accidentally releasing my psychic secrets. The 14-month extension won’t come until next spring, when Congress finally makes it illegal to layoff any employee.

Enjoy a great autumn weekend,
Andrew Snyder

Unfortunately, that’s not the case. And that means Constellation will have to clear a number of hurdles if it’s going to fulfill its long-term promise.
Last year, the company bet big on higher energy prices and paid the price dearly when the economy collapsed.

Constellation’s very high level of debt, with large bond maturities in 2009 and 2012 at that time meant they were flirting with financial disaster.  That forced the company into a deal with Électricité de France SA (EDF), in which the European energy giant agreed to inject $4.5 billion into Constellation in exchange for almost 50% ownership of its nuclear plants.

That includes a brand new plant, Calvert Cliffs 3, that’s still subject to pending regulatory approval. Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley has convinced the Public Service Commission (PSC) to hold open, public hearings to determine if this new deal is in the public’s best interest.

One of the main points of contention is the two energy companies’ demand to access the cash at distributing subsidiary Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. (BGE).

“We know that BGE is a cash cow for Constellation Energy,” said Gov. O’Malley. “We know that BGE pays more than half of all dividends paid into Constellation Energy and has a huge impact on Constellation’s bottom line.  We also know that Constellation Energy has had a tumultuous history over these last few years.”

The Maryland governor also noted that Constellation last year lost 80% of its stock value and was just hours away from bankruptcy before EDF stepped in.

Potential construction costs associated with the new nuclear plant are another large uncertainty. Nuclear plants have the tendency to run over budget, and that means the utilities then come back to regulators asking for rate increases in order to fund the cost overruns.

On the other hand, EDF Vice President John Morris recently testified to the PSC that “a decision denying EDF’s application or imposing conditions on the approval of the application that cause it to fail, would bring an end to the development” of the project.

And the company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Pierre Gadonneix, told French lawmakers that EDF expects to get all the necessary approvals for this transaction by the end of the year.

The approval would generate strong economic gains for the state of Maryland, where EDF’s U.S. headquarters are based.

Électricité de France, a firm owned 84% by the French government has its own challenges.  Having bought British Energy Group PLC and embarked in other growth-oriented investments, it too got caught with too much debt. Like Constellation, EDF is in debt-reduction mode.  The company is rumored to be pondering the sale of another 20% stake in British Energy, a swap of electricity assets with German utility E.On AG and the possible float of another 14% of its own stock.

We must also factor in the possibility that destructive protectionism will affect the deal.  The Obama administration recently levied special import duties on Chinese tires.  When governments are forced to confront the tough realities of high unemployment, the likelihood that they resort to protectionism to boost local employment is high.  And this always conspires against efficiency and global growth.

Fortunately, there is no evidence of any such pressure playing a role yet.

In addition to the many uncertainties about the EDF deal and the Calvert Cliffs plant, we have to deal with regulatory uncertainties that are plaguing the industry.  Evolving environmental regulations will require large increases in capital investments.  These eventually are passed on to consumers, reducing demand.  In the months and years ahead, we might see so-called “cap-and-trade” legislation, smart grid systems and renewable portfolio standards that will complicate things even more in unpredictable ways.

The cap-and-trade legislation, should it pass, could benefit Constellation greatly.  If the United States made a stronger commitment to reducing carbon emissions, nuclear would have to be a big part of the equation. And Constellation already is well positioned to take advantage of this.  But while such regulation would be good for the company in the long run, right now it is just another uncertainty.

We also need to remember that a new nuclear power plant in the United States hasn’t been built in 20 years, so a new labor force and supply chain is needed.  And despite the fact that with the support of EDF, Constellation is the largest nuclear operator in the world, these challenges cannot be achieved overnight.

We are not going to go into the Constellation results in detail.  Demand was down in the United States in general, the summer was mild, and industrial demand – which is down between 3% and 7% in different regions – is not coming back yet.

Constellation has indeed taken steps to reduce its trading and other risks and divested several non-profitable operations.  The vast majority of Constellation’s June 30 earnings were due to special items that boosted GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) earnings.  The special one-time items from divested earnings accounted for about 60% of the strong upside adjustment. But they are not likely to recur, and in this complex business, some other one-time items have the unfortunate trait of appearing out of nowhere – just when it is least convenient to shareholders.

I love Constellation’s strong operating performance, its strong position in nuclear energy, and its focus on growing alternative energy.  These strengths are likely to play out well over the long term, and could even lead this company to superior profits down the line.  But there are too many uncertainties weighing on an already damaged balance sheet, which makes the risk for this company too large to bear in the short term.

If Constellation is hit by any one of these risks, another big hit to the stock could lead to another equity infusion.  And the traditional argument for buying utility stocks as an income investment does not work well either, given its low dividend yield and the company’s need to conserve cash.

So, with so much left to chance, I would not buy Constellation at this time. But there is enough long-term potential, that if I already owned Constellation stock, I would hold it for a while to see if those uncertainties are resolved. But be aware that holding the stock is an overly speculative position that needs to be monitored constantly for the developments that we outlined above.

Shares of Constellation Energy closed Friday down 1.45%, or 47 cents, at $31.84. The stock earlier this month hit a 52-week high of $33.37 after falling to a 52-week low of $15 in March.

Recommendation: Hold Constellation Energy Group Inc. (NYSE: CEG) (**).

Source: Constellation Energy Group Inc. Has Long-Term Potential, But Short-Term Problems

When a large holder of U.S. dollars declares that the dollar is in “great shape,” should we believe him? My answer is, “Probably not.”

Russia’s Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin told journalists this week that the U.S. dollar is in “good shape.” He added that, “It’s too early to speak of an alternative [to the U.S. dollar].” These remarks came after Chinese and Russian officials have quite publicly suggested that the world’s financial system would benefit from using a currency that wasn’t being run by a bunch of inflationistas in America.

But the dilemma for the large dollar-holders of the world – Japan, Russia, and China to name a few – is how candidly they should verbalize in public about what everyone knows in private. By blowing the whistle on the Fed’s inflationary monetary policy, dollar-holders penalize themselves. The lesson? There’s a price to pay for rightly pointing out that a huge supply of Treasury bonds threatens the credit rating of the U.S. That price is paid by owners of dollar-denominated assets.

The dollar-supportive remarks by Kudrin, then, should be seen for what they are: a white lie, designed to halt the dollar’s slide…at least temporarily. In the meantime, however, you can bet that these same dollar-holders are working behind the scenes to find alternatives to the greenback and, of course, to diversify their currency reserves into other currencies or tangible assets. It’s just that you don’t want to precipitate a crisis until you’re good and ready to profit from it with a well-planned trade. Goldman Sachs would never make that kind of mistake!

There may be a few escape avenues from the dollar. It comes down to figuring out what-if anything-will go up when the U.S. dollar resumes going down. In fact, the question on everyone’s minds is what U.S. creditors will do with their money if they aren’t lending it to Barack Obama to spend.

“Over time,” says Nouriel Roubini, professor of economics at the Stern School of Business at NYU, “the willingness of the U.S. creditors to finance U.S. spending and buy dollar reserves is going to be reduced. People are getting nervous rightly about us devaluing or inflating our way out of the debt problem and causing real losses on the holdings of those assets.”

If you’re losing money on an asset, naturally you’re going to either sell of it, or at the very least, accumulate less of it. But then what? Where does your money go after that? We’d suggest the investment needs of the emerging market nations are the natural replacement for throwing away money in the U.S. Treasury market. Granted, there’s risk in emerging markets. But it’s now clear there’s risk in the sovereign bond market too. Take your pick.

Speaking of those emerging markets, four of them spoke with one voice in Russia this week. The leaders of Brazil, Russia, India, and China gathered to figure out how to solve their dollar dilemma. Criticize it too much, you lose value on your current dollar-denominated holdings. Do nothing, you lose value on your dollar-denominated holdings as Obama and his Congress spend America into poverty and servitude…and then inflate like mad men.

“There is a strong need for a stable, predictable and more diversified international monetary system,” the final statement from the BRIC nations read. Russia’s Dmitry Medvedev added his own “two roubles,” saying that existing reserve currencies, “have not managed to perform their functions.”

And what is the function of a reserve currency? Well, it’s probably the same as the tripartite function of any money: as a store of value, a unit of account, and a medium of exchange. Countries hold baskets of currencies (yen, Euros, Swiss Francs, U.S. dollars) in order to conduct international trade and commerce.

Of course all this is relatively new. That is, when money used to be a commodity (gold and/or silver) then a country’s monetary reserves were the same as its precious metal reserves. Debtor nations that consumed more than they produced and borrowed to do so paid the price in a net outflow of commodity money. But things don’t work that way in a world where everyone uses fiat money. So what we’re seeing now is a worldwide monetary system that is, well, systemically flawed.

Make of it what you will. What we make of it is that the very foundation of the world’s commerce and the currency in which it’s conducted is shifting. The stock markets of the world have no idea what to make of all this because it is not clear yet who the winners and losers will be.

All that we know is that paper currencies and government debts are proliferating very rapidly. We also know that natural resources are not. In fact, they are depleting very steadily.

So we conclude that the prices of most natural resources will go up…a lot. That’s why lots of bears on the U.S. dollar suggest buying gold. We are sympathetic to this idea, but we’d suggest a slightly different strategy: Sell bonds. Buy energy.

Source: Sell Bonds, Buy Energy

Editors Note: Pulbished by the Rude Awakening, this article origianlly appeared in the Australian Daily Reckoning

If we’re using numbers instead of metaphors, we’d say the CRB Reuters/Jeffries Index had its biggest monthly rally in 34 years. It was up 14% on the month. That was the best performance since July of 1974.

A monthly performance like that can only mean one thing. We’re just not sure what one thing it is. It could mean commodities have rebounded from being oversold, as they were in late 2008. It could mean that markets are less pessimistic about the global economy than your editor at the Old Hat Factory (though we doubt that).

It could also mean that investors increasingly prefer tangible assets as a long-term growth strategy over financial assets. Even after $1.465 trillion in realised losses by global banks and financial institutions, there are trillions more to come. Commercial real estate…the option-ARM recast period in the U.S. housing market…European banks…any or all of these things could conspire to lead to more losses and more capital raisings in the financial sector.

Perhaps that is what explains crude oil’s biggest monthly gain in a decade. July crude futures traded at $66.52 in Friday’s New York action. The U.S. dollar price of gold powered to $981.20, before sliding back a bit $975.

The Aussie gold price is fighting its way up despite the fact that the Aussie dollar keeps gaining on the greenback. While the Aussie gold price is up just $1.71 in the last 30 days (0.14%), the U.S. gold price is up nearly nine percent. We reckon the Aussie gold price will begin moving up closer to $1,500 again on a combination of events (weakness against the greenback for one.)

There are also two data releases this week that will affect the Aussie dollar. The RBA meets tomorrow to decide the price of money in Australia (set interest rates). And then Wednesday, the March quarter GDP figures come out. This will tell us how bad the recession is, although not how bad it may become.

It’s no use predicting these things. But for what it’s worth, our view is that we’re in a bit of a plateau between down moves. The “down moves” will come again in financial stocks, although they may not be as “down” as before, and employment. Mostly, the indices are going to have to price in very slow GDP growth for the remainder of the year and more job losses.

The wildcard for Australia is trade. Its proximity to Asia means that a rebound in that part of the world provides some cushion to resource companies. But then, we thought the resource stocks would be pretty well insulated from the first round of deleveraging too, and we were wrong about that. And the second time around?

Well, even if the long-term underlying demand for Aussie resources is real and growing, it still takes real money to make new projects happen. The financing of resource projects will continue to be a key issue in your stock selection. The other issue, obviously, is the direction of commodity prices.

Take LNG, for example. Last year the Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association said it wanted to triple Australia’s LNG output to sixty million tonnes per year. Meeting this weekend in Darwin, the group says 50 million is a more realistic target, given both the slump in energy prices and tight credit markets.

If LNG prices track oil prices-as they did in the big run up to $150 per barrel for crude-the economics of big Aussie projects get a lot better. Our view is that energy prices are going structurally higher anyway. Global recession aside, the big plunge in energy capital spending virtually guarantees a supply shortage in the coming years anyway.

Besides, you have to wonder why big international energy firms would be investing in conventional and unconventional Australian LNG projects if they weren’t convinced that a) oil prices were going higher, or b) more carbon-friendly fuels like gas would gain as coal gets politically demonised and punished with cap-and-trade or emissions-trading-schemes.

Obviously, if global trade continues to contract and a second round of losses in the global banking industry triggers another financial crisis, demand for energy is going to fall. And while we’re at it, stocks would probably test the 2003 lows too. We enter a new stage of grimness.

In the meantime, energy and precious metals stocks are riding higher commodity prices. And there’s a distinctly 2007 mind-set in the air. It’s vogue to be long-commodities and indifferent to risks in the financial system. It’s enough to make an investor with a short memory nervous. More on that tomorrow.

Dan Denning

Commodities Tell Us the World Wont Stop Turning in a Financial Crisis

The Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 26.2 points, or 0.32% as of 11:00 a.m. today (Thursday), while the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index was up 4.58 points, or 0.52%.

The surge was prompted by an increase in U.S. wholesale prices, which allayed concern over deflation. Producer prices rose 0.3% in April after falling 1.2% in March. Food prices posted the biggest gain, soaring 1.5% – enough to offset a 0.1% fall in energy prices. Excluding food and fuel prices, so-called core-prices climbed 0.1%.

The rise in producer prices accompanied an increase in import prices, which climbed 1.6% in April, the government said yesterday. Producer prices and the cost of imports comprise two of the three major gauges of inflation. The third measure of inflation, consumer prices, is scheduled for release tomorrow.

The rise in U.S. equities was further supported by a solid earnings report from Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the world’s largest retailer. Wal-Mart posted a profit of $3 billion, or 77 cents a share, in the quarter ended April 30, up from 76 cents a year earlier, matching analysts’ forecasts, according to Thomson Reuters.

Net sales for the quarter fell 0.6% to $93.4 billion, but the company blamed that decline on the negative impact of a stronger dollar, which dented international sales. Wal-Mart’s international operating income fell 16.2% to $880 million on an 11.1% drop in sales to $21.3 billion.

However, international operating income at constant exchange rates was $1.13 billion in the three months ended April 30 on sales of $26.1 billion.

“In almost every country we grew the top line faster than the market despite the strong dollar and a recession that is even deeper in some countries than it is in the United States,” said chief executive Mike Duke.

Wal-Mart’s resilience offered a modicum of comfort to the retail sector after a report yesterday showed retail sales fell 0.4% in April, the eighth monthly decline in the last 10 months. Retail sales tumbled 1.3% in March.

Retail sales have been badly battered by a sharp rise in unemployment. And data from the Labor Department today furthered illustrated the frailty of the current labor market.

Initial claims for unemployment rose by 32,000 to 637,000 in the week ended May 9, from a revised 605,000 the week prior, the Labor Department said.

The economy has shed about 5.7 million jobs since the recession began in December 2007. Payrolls fell by 539,000 in April, as the jobless rate climbed to 8.9% – its highest level since 1983.

Source: Producer Prices and Wal-Mart Results Give the Market Edge Over Weak Jobs Data

Ready to burn an extra $3,000 each year? As if energy prices were not creating enough havoc throughout this country, the Obama administration is getting ready to pounce on the idea of a cap-and-trade system.

There is a good chance their plans could cost each of us a few extra grand each year.

Call the extra figures that will trickle into our monthly energy bills an investment on the future. Or call the increased costs a “usage” fee that goes straight to Uncle Sam. Just don’t call it a tax, as we all know Obama is a tax-cutter.

It is too early to tell if Congress will be naïve or stupid enough to pass any sort of cap-and-trade legislation in the near future, but it is certainly not too early to hear some of the nation’s best and brightest investors calling the idea what it is.

“Monstrously stupid,” is what Berkshire Hathaway’s vice chairman, Charlie Munger, called Obama’s plan.

Even if the majority of credits were given to the nation’s carbon-producing industries, Obama’s cap-and-trade system would almost instantly raise the price of just about every product and service sold in this country. It stands to be the most ineffective, yet most dangerous tax in the nation’s history.

Even so, emotional, feel-good investors are finding a way to profit.

Unsustainable investing

If you visit these pages often, you probably know my disdain for the green-energy industry runs deep.

It’s not that I hate Mother Nature and want to see the earth shrivel up and die (in another career I am an outdoors writer and nature junky). My hatred of the green investing movement is due to its infallible record of destroying wealth.

I started my career as a financial advisor, and my fiduciary duty to protect wealth still runs deep.

For generations folks have been working on electric cars, super-efficient solar panels and waste-based fuel sources. It has been one of the most predictable cyclical markets in history. Invest when energy prices are high. Lose money when prices naturally decline.

One company on track to lock investors into the cycle is First Solar (NASDAQ:FSLR). The company and its low-cost solar panels are making its in-and-out investors a pile of short-term profits. But if you are a set-it-and-forget-it kind of investor, you had better pay attention. The action will not last.

Set your sights on a long-term investment in anything solar, and you might as well forget about profits. The momentum fostered over the last six months or so is simply not sustainable. The government will not be handing out billions in stimulus for the next thirty years (I hope). New venture capital won’t be spurring the industry in a race to be a first mover. And most importantly, consumer demand will have long moved onto the next trend. We are a fickle nation.

Let’s face it. With current technology, solar panels cannot provide the kind of reliable energy the average consumer needs. Sure, a handful of “greens” will build their houses in a cloudless desert to make themselves feel good. But for those of us that live in area where moisture rules the middle atmosphere, solar panels are nothing more than expensive yard art.

So here’s my advice. If you can make a trading move with relative speed, invest away. The “green” industry will do well over the next six months while Congress gains votes debating cap and trade.

But if you are risk adverse and are investing for retirement, stay away. Stick with proven industries with high-quality revenue streams.

Until science is no longer a political debate (when did that start, anyway?), the solar industry will be too unpredictable for quality-minded investors.

Source: Solar Investing: My apologies in Advance

Total retail sales for March clocked in at $344.4 billion, a decrease of 1.1% from February and a 9.4% dive from March 2008. Overall, first quarter retail sales sank 8.8% compared to the same period a year ago, the U.S. Commerce Department said in a report.

The stats reverse the back-to-back monthly gains that kicked off 2009. Those gains surprised the market not only because they followed dismal holiday shopping numbers in November and December, but also because unemployment continued to get worse.

“The surprisingly sharp drop in retail spending shows how uncertain consumers are about the recovery,” Joel Naroff, president of Naroff Economic Advisers, wrote in a note to clients. “Consumer spending had been growing much more strongly in the first quarter than any of us could have expected, so a one-month cutback should not have been a surprise.”

Among the hardest hit sectors, gasoline station sales were down 34.1% from March 2008, and motor vehicle and parts dealers’ sales were down 23.5% from last year. Food and beverage stores held strong with only a 0.1% decline. Healthcare spending posted the best figures with a 2.2% annual gain.

“This was not a pretty report as demand for just about everything fell,” Naroff said. “There were large reductions in demand for furniture, electronics and appliances, building materials, sporting goods and clothing.”

Sinking demand for energy products played a large hand in keeping producer prices in check. The U.S. Department of Labor said that the Producer Price Index (PPI) for finished goods, a measure of inflation, fell 1.2% in March after inching forward 0.1% in February.

Prices for energy products fell 5.5% after rising 1.3% in February. Food prices fell 0.7% after falling 1.6% the month prior. Excluding food and energy, the PPI was a flat for the month.

While not a positive, flat inflation isn’t much of a threat when compared to the host of other economic issues the Obama Administration is addressing. In fact, the U.S. Federal Reserve said it expected inflation to be “subdued” in a March 18 statement.

But inflationary concerns will be on the horizon, when government measures to reboot the economy kick in – flooding the market with liquidity that can’t be absorbed by record low interest rates.

Source: Retail Sales and Inflation Slip in March

The price of oil is a function of many things, but as with all economic issues its prime mover is demand. Demand for the past 18 months has been dropping due to the economic meltdown worldwide. This has made for great energy prices, but it’s like a warm day in January in Canada.  It’s not real and anyone who has ever lived through a northern winter knows it will not last.

Why?

First, the world is coming out of this recession and oil demand is about to explode and we, the USA, the biggest energy pig in the world, have done nothing to prepare for it. We have less of an ability to provide for our energy needs now than we did 35 years ago.

Second, Asia and the rest of the developing world are coming out of this worldwide slow down, too. Consider how much more oil will be going to Asia and the developing world as they rebound and start to suck up what’s left of the world’s capacity to produce black gold. The demand picture really begins to come into focus.

Third, the current effort of the Obama administration to avoid a depression by pumping trillions into the economy has worked. We are soaring out of the hole faster than anyone could have imagined a year ago. At the same time we are doing so with no way to fuel it, literally fuel it.

We are completely unprotected from the threats to our economy and future well being that comes from importing 75% of our oil.

Fourth, there has been zero new development of oil reserves partly because of a very admirable effort by the Obama administration to shift to clean renewable energy. Clean and renewable is great, but we have about a ten year gap that has to be filled with oil before we can make that a reality.

Fifth, a dysfunctional congress whose priorities are their careers, their party, their district and whatever is left over goes to the well being of this country, in that order. Congress is all but incapable of working toward a long term solution to the problem.

Add them up and we have all of the necessary elements for the biggest rise in oil prices in our history over the next three to five years. Here’s how we can make money on this mess.

DXO, Power Shares Deutsche Bank Crude, or DIG, Ultra Oil and gas Pro Shares, both are designed to give you twice the percentage return of any increase in the price of oil. In the past month or so DXO bottomed at about $1.90 per share and ran to about $3.20 on just a $12 dollar move up in the price of crude. That’s a 68% move. DIG has had a similar neck snapping rebound.

If oil only goes to the $75 range, which is a given at this point, the DXO and DIG stand to move another 130%. The money we can make here is mind boggling.

The best part of this play is that it is inevitable. The chances of oil not moving up in price are almost zero.

You will only get a few opportunities like this in your investing life. Think of all the times you looked back at the market and thought how great it would have been if you had put money in at the bottom. This is the bottom!

As always time is the key to the success of this recommendation. A move to $75 a barrel is very likely by the end of this year, but the big money could be several years out. Give this time to work and you won’t be disappointed.

100% plus this year is just the beginning of this move.

Source: Retire Early Compliments of OPEC

Total retail sales for March clocked in at $344.4 billion, a decrease of 1.1% from February and a 9.4% dive from March 2008. Overall, first quarter retail sales sank 8.8% compared to the same period a year ago, the U.S. Commerce Department said in a report.

The stats reverse the back-to-back monthly gains that kicked off 2009. Those gains surprised the market not only because they followed dismal holiday shopping numbers in November and December, but also because unemployment continued to get worse.

“The surprisingly sharp drop in retail spending shows how uncertain consumers are about the recovery,” Joel Naroff, president of Naroff Economic Advisers, wrote in a note to clients. “Consumer spending had been growing much more strongly in the first quarter than any of us could have expected, so a one-month cutback should not have been a surprise.”

Among the hardest hit sectors, gasoline station sales were down 34.1% from March 2008, and motor vehicle and parts dealers’ sales were down 23.5% from last year. Food and beverage stores held strong with only a 0.1% decline. Healthcare spending posted the best figures with a 2.2% annual gain.

“This was not a pretty report as demand for just about everything fell,” Naroff said. “There were large reductions in demand for furniture, electronics and appliances, building materials, sporting goods and clothing.”

Sinking demand for energy products played a large hand in keeping producer prices in check. The U.S. Department of Labor said that the Producer Price Index (PPI) for finished goods, a measure of inflation, fell 1.2% in March after inching forward 0.1% in February.

Prices for energy products fell 5.5% after rising 1.3% in February. Food prices fell 0.7% after falling 1.6% the month prior. Excluding food and energy, the PPI was a flat for the month.

While not a positive, flat inflation isn’t much of a threat when compared to the host of other economic issues the Obama Administration is addressing. In fact, the U.S. Federal Reserve said it expected inflation to be “subdued” in a March 18 statement.

But inflationary concerns will be on the horizon, when government measures to reboot the economy kick in – flooding the market with liquidity that can’t be absorbed by record low interest rates.

Source: Retail Sales and Inflation Slip in March

The first set of announcements to pay attention to are the housing figures for January, which come out simultaneously on Wednesday morning. Both the Building Permits and Housing Starts are expected to post declines from December.

Last month, both reports missed estimates by about 50k units. I’ve got to think that this month will come in lower than estimates by at least that amount. It seems no matter how low the estimates, the housing market will still disappoint.

On Thursday, we have the PPI and Core PPI figures for January.  For the first time since last July, expectations are for an increase in the PPI. This could be due to a number of factors, such as an increase in energy prices, but the concerning one would be inflation. Could the Fed monetary policy finally be catching up with us? Time will tell.

The same holds true for the CPI estimate that is announced on Friday along with the Core CPI reading. For the first time since last July, the CPI reading is expected to increase. Since this reading includes energy costs, it could be simply due to the slight increase in gas prices recently. That would be the preferred reason, anything but dreaded inflation.

The final report of interest this week is the Philadelphia Fed announcement on Thursday. Unfortunately, the report is expected to show further decline in the manufacturing sector in the Tri-State area. In order for the economy to turn around, every manufacturing report, including this one, needs to start showing an increase in production.

Source: Are We Starting To See Inflation Creep Up?