“I’m more interested in exploiting Buffett than defending him,” Hough writes. “The shortest path to being a great investor is to copy one.”

He recommends against Berkshire shares because of its concentration in financial service companies. “Investors who prefer to avoid that can simply cherry-pick from its holdings, which are reported quarterly.”

Hough chose five stocks that “Buffett says he still likes but that Berkshire has trimmed its stake in to make room for new purchases.”

The selections: Burlington Northern (NYSE:BNI); Eaton (NYSE:ETN), an industrial products company; ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP); Kraft (NYSE:KFT); and NRG Energy (NYSE:NRG), a utility.

This from Jason:

“I’ve been buying American stocks,” Buffett said in an editorial in The New York Times. “This is my personal account I’m talking about, in which I previously owned nothing but United States government bonds… If prices keep looking attractive, my non-Berkshire net worth will soon be 100% in United States equities.”

As the world’s richest man, Buffett offers a kind of comfort that few others can.  And it couldn’t come at a better time. The fourth quarter of 2008 was the worst quarter for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index in more than two decades, as the closely watched stock-market benchmark tumbled 23%.

It’s likely that even Buffett took the same bath as the average investor.

In separate filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK.A, BRK B) said it spent $9.45 billion on equity securities in the first nine months of last year, Bloomberg News reported. Among the purchases:

• Berkshire bought a majority stake in U.S. Bancorp (USB) over a period of time that never saw the bank’s share price drop below 29.09, according to Bloomberg News. That stock is currently trading at less than $15 a share.

• Berkshire increased its Ingersoll-Rand Co. (IR) stake six-fold last year when the shares never fell below $36.54. That company’s stock has lost about half its value since Buffett made those purchases.

• And Berkshire stocked up on shares of Eaton Corp. (ETN) between July and September  – a stretch in which the stock never fell below $52.32.  Eaton closed yesterday (Wednesday) at $44.36 a share.

With such ill-timed purchases, some analysts are beginning to think that “Warren” has lost his touch.

“People like to second guess Warren Buffett, but it’s not just a flip question to ask if he should have kept his powder dry a bit longer,” Jeff Matthews, author of “Pilgrimage to Warren Buffett’s Omaha” and founder of Ram Partners LP, told Bloomberg. “He’s paid dramatically higher prices than where some of them are now trading at, so you have to wonder if he was too quick on the trigger.”

But, as a long term investor who has said that his favorite time to hold a stock is “forever,” Buffett sees things differently.

“Let me be clear on one point: I can’t predict the short-term movements of the stock market. I haven’t the faintest idea as to whether stocks will be higher or lower a month – or a year – from now,” said Buffett.  “What is likely, however, is that the market will move higher, perhaps substantially so, well before either sentiment or the economy turns up. So if you wait for the robins, spring will be over.”

To support this claim, Fortune points to a long-revered Buffett metric: Total U.S. stock value versus gross national product (GNP). According to Buffett, stocks are a logical investment when their total market value equates to 70%-80% of GNP. And right now, it does.

In late January, total stock value equated to just 75% of GNP, down from a record peak of nearly 200% in March 2000. Indeed, for most of the past decade, the ratio of stock value to GNP has ranged from 150% to 190%. That makes now an ideal time to buy. And Buffett continues to do just that.

What Warren’s Buying

In addition to taking healthy stakes in U.S. Bancorp, Ingersoll-Rand, and Eaton, Buffett also committed $4.7 billion to Constellation Energy Group Inc. (CEG), $5 billion to Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS), and $3 billion to General Electric Co. (GE) last fall.

Buffett has also spent the past few years stocking up on railroad stocks, especially Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. (BNI). Berkshire’s most recent purchase of 2.6 million shares took its stake to more than 76 million shares – in excess of 20% – of the nation’s second-largest railroad.

And last week, Berkshire threw in a few surprises.

After buying 3% of Swiss Re (OTC: SWCEY) in January 2008, Berkshire last week poured another $2.6 billion into the world’s second-largest reinsurance company. Swiss Re has lost about three-quarters of its market value since Buffett’s original investment – further evidence that the investing icon remains undaunted by his losses.

Berkshire agreed to buy $300 million of corporate debt issued by motorcycle icon Harley Davidson Inc. (HOG). The senior unsecured notes purchased by Berkshire offer a 15% annual interest payment, making it one of Buffett’s many recent fixed-income investments.

Buffett agreed to buy $300 million of debt from USG Corp. (USG) in November, and his preferred shares of Goldman Sachs offer a 10% yield. The $2.6 billion he put into Swiss Re was accompanied by a 12% yield.

“He’s got cash coming in faster than most people would have a ready place to put it,” Frank Betz, a partner at Carret Zane Capital Management, which holds Berkshire shares, told Bloomberg. “This economy is certainly providing him with opportunities.”

With about $30 billion in cash on hand at Berkshire Hathaway, analysts are wondering where Warren’s going to strike next.

There is some speculation that if Berkshire shares continue to slide, Buffett could order a share buyback.

In the past, Buffett has said a company must meet two conditions to warrant buybacks of its stock: “First the company has available funds – cash plus sensible borrowing capacity – beyond the near-term needs of the business and, second, finds its stock selling below its intrinsic value, conservatively calculated,” he said.

Shares of Berkshire are down 37% in the past year and there’s little doubt that Buffett has the money.

Of course, Buffett also said last month in an interview with PBS that he would notify shareholders of his intentions before engaging in a buyback program.

“If I ever name a number, I’ll name it publicly,” Buffett said. “I mean, if we ever get to the point where we’re contemplating doing it, I would make a public announcement.”

The last time Buffett made such an announcement was nine years ago.

Another possibility is that Berkshire will invest in energy companies with large holdings in oil sands – notably Calgary-based Nexen Inc. (NXY).

Buffett, along with Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) mogul Bill Gates visited the Athabasca Oil Sands region in northeastern Alberta last August.

“The world will be using more oil 15 or 20 years from now,” Buffett told the Financial Post in an interview. “We are on a course that cannot be changed. It would surprise me if the world doesn’t want to use 100 million barrels a day in 15 or 20 years.”

“You need some … elephant fields [of oil to meet looming demand] and we haven’t found any elephant fields in the last 15 or 20 years,” he added. “So the sands are huge.”

However, some analysts remain skeptical.

“Seems there is a rumor that Berkshire is interested in Nexen – no one can give me comfort that this is indeed the case – they haven’t bought into [exploration and production] names before … but stranger things have happened,” investment bank Scotia Capital wrote in a note to clients.

What Buffett will do next remains unclear, but there is one certainty: He won’t be sitting on the sidelines and hoarding cash.

“Today, people who hold cash equivalents feel comfortable. They shouldn’t,” Buffett wrote back in October. “They have opted for a terrible long-term asset, one that pays virtually nothing and is certain to depreciate in value,” Buffett said in October.

“Equities will almost certainly outperform cash over the next decade, probably by a substantial degree. Those investors who cling now to cash are betting they can efficiently time their move away from it later. In waiting for the comfort of good news, they are ignoring Wayne Gretzky’s advice: ‘I skate to where the puck is going to be, not to where it has been’.”

Source: Buffett Bargain Hunting Despite 2008 Losses

Yet India remains one of the world’s great growth opportunities and investors at this level may well be getting in on the ground floor of a very major long-term profit play.

Let me explain …

India’s economy expanded at a breezy 9% clip last year. The rate of growth is expected to throttle back to about 8% this year, but that’s still excellent, justifying fairly lofty price-earnings ratios in the local stock market. Even so, market valuations there do not now appear excessive; the overall market is trading at about 18 times earnings, which is not particularly high given the economy’s growth potential.

As with China, if India can get its house in order – both politically and economically – we’re looking at the very real prospect of very rapid growth before that country’s standard of living starts to approach that of the West, causing India’s rate of growth to slow dramatically.

The bottom line: With 1.1 billion potential Indian consumers, we’re looking at a huge potential purchasing power for all kinds of consumer products.
Now, there are some potential pitfalls to be concerned about in the near term.

For instance, the current Indian government, in office since 2004, is a coalition between the Congress Party, which had ruled India for most of the period since independence, though without any great success, and the Communists (who are a pretty mild lot, but are nevertheless pro-government and fairly anti-market).

Although India Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is a moderate, the government as a whole has seen India’s economic emergence as an opportunity to fund favorite projects and social programs. For instance, this year’s budget proposes an 18% increase in public spending for the 12 months that end next March, over and above the 24% increase in public spending for the year-to-March 2008. Even after several years of rapid growth, the state budget deficit (the federal shortfall plus the local deficit) is around 7% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). With any kind of downturn at all, that 7% could quickly swell to 10% – a point at which deficits become difficult to finance.

Now there is some hope on the horizon – an election is due in May 2009, at the latest, and the center-right opposition is currently leading in opinion polls. Even so, shrewd investing veterans know better than to rely on that alone for their investment profits.

The other current problem is inflation, right now running at 8% per annum, which means that it’s higher than the level of short-term domestic interest rates. Higher commodity and energy prices have affected India as they have other countries: India’s position is made more difficult by the poverty that afflicts much of the population. The Indian government, like the good socialists that they are, has seen fit to restrict exports of rice and to subsidize other foods and gasoline (the latter makes no sense socially, since automobiles are largely owned by the middle classes, not the poor). Needless to say, these subsidies and restrictions make the budget deficit worse; and they will pose an additional problem in the future, when they are lifted and consumer prices soar in response.

Having described some of the challenges that India faces, let’s be clear on a very key point: No market is perfect. Ironically, if it were, it would be a much less alluring investment opportunity. I mean, let’s face it: If India didn’t face the problems that we’ve detailed here, the market would be trading at a hefty 40 times earnings, well above its current multiple of 18.

The underlying truth remains that economic growth has achieved real momentum in India, that any government we can picture will do no more than slow the country’s economy incrementally, and that the economics of providing manufacturing and services from a base in India – especially in the era of the Internet – is so compelling from a cost and logistical standpoint that it must inevitably continue to produce huge profits for long-term investors for decades to come.

When it comes to India, it’s almost as if the central question no longer is “how much should I invest in India?” but rather “how can I afford not to invest in India?”

Let’s take a look at how best to invest in this fast-growing economy.

India Profit Plays

The simplest way to invest in India is via an Exchange Traded Note (ETN), in this case the Barclays IPath India Index ETN (INP), whose returns are linked to the Morgan Stanley Capital International India Index (unlike a conventional ETF, an ETN is technically a 30-year note, so it distributes assets to holders at the end of 30 years). In January, INP was trading at about a 15% premium to its net asset value (NAV). But now it’s trading very close to its NAV, having slipped backward.

As an alternative you might consider the Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund (IIF) or the India Fund (IFN), both actively managed funds investing in India, which currently trade at discounts to NAV of 2.0% and 0.3% respectively.

Individual shares to look at would include Infosys Technologies Ltd., (INFY) the India-based software giant, which following the fall in the Indian market has declined to a fairly reasonable 19 times earnings, or 16 times next year’s earnings.

Another possibility is the pharmaceutical company, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. (RDY), which, as a major generic drugs manufacturer, can expect to benefit from the expiration of many U.S. pharmaceutical patents in the next five years, and right now carries a P/E ratio of only 15.

Finally, you might consider an India-based automaker that’s been in the news a lot recently: Tata Motors Ltd. (TTM), which is trading at only 11 times earnings, reflecting the risk involved in a medium-sized company taking on the world automotive industry. In the luxury end of the market, Tata recently bought Jaguar and Land Rover from Ford Motor Co. (F), for $2.3 billion. At the economy end of the market, Tata has announced the Nano, a car for the Indian market that will sell for $2,500 – 40% cheaper than any other car on the world market. And that’s after Tata had a smash hit with a light truck designed for the India market, as well.

As I’ve previously articulated in several Money Morning articles, it is highly likely that – years from now – the worldwide center of auto-making will migrate from Detroit to someplace in either China or India, or both, thanks to the combined allure of low costs and potentially huge consumer markets. That means that Tata, as India’s largest manufacturer, is likely to be a key player in the global auto market of the future.

So if you know what the ultimate outcome of that global game is going to be, why not deal yourself a winning hand right now, and then sit back and wait for this scenario (and your profits) to play out?