Although it is standard procedure for governments to soothe their citizenry with placebo politics in order to avoid panic and uprising, there is a line after which such a campaign is counterproductive. In fact, misleading statements about financial security are potentially dangerous to the country’s long-term economic wellbeing, and potentially toxic to investors.

Economic and financial statistics are the battleground over which the war of perception is fought. But as the saying goes: “Figures lie, and liars figure.”Politicians are masters of the selected use of statistics to lend credibility to their statements. In reality, the numbers often mask the truth.

A year ago, financial markets hovered near nominal highs, retail sales appeared to be growing and real estate prices were near historic highs. Wall Street and Washington made the most of these “over-the-top” numbers to foster a sense of economic invincibility. With the national gaze lifted towards sunny skies, few noticed the danger of the mortgage crisis, which lay below like a tiger trap.

But like watching a poorly dubbed martial arts film, the average American is beginning to notice that the dialogue does not match the on-screen action. As a result, many people are developing a deep suspicion of statistics, which over time will greatly diminish the government’s credibility. In the coming economic crisis, this loss of credibility may have severe consequences.

One vital statistic in the perception battle is gross domestic product (GDP), which is the total of all spending on goods and services within our economy, and is used as the key measure of national wealth generation and economic growth. It may be surprising to some, but GDP includes money spent on clearing up natural disasters such as hurricane relief and pollution control. How such expenditures – that really only replace what has been lost – increase national wealth, is beyond me.

Unemployment figures are another worry. Government adjustments for seasonal and population changes are acceptable. But excluding from the unemployment rolls those who are neither actively seeking jobs nor the “long-term” unemployed is not.

Perhaps, the greatest area of concern about statistical manipulation is the measurement of inflation, or Consumer Price Index (CPI). By manipulating this single statistic the government can miraculously transform rising prices into economic growth.

The Department of Labor has set so-called “core” inflation, excluding food and energy, at 2.2%. Even “headline” inflation, including food and energy, is published officially at only some 4%. The problem is that these figures bear very little relation to the reality of price increases experienced on Main Street, which some estimate to be in excess of 10%.

Statisticians assign different weights to the elements comprising the CPI that are often not reflective of the spending habits of ordinary citizens. For example, housing maintenance (including heating oil), a major expenditure, is given only a small part in the Index’s makeup. In addition, the re-pricing of items such as automobiles to allow for added “hedonistic” features such as enhanced “value for money” is wide open to varying judgments. How these statistical decisions are made is really anyone’s guess. But it is absurd to assume that the government’s overwhelming interest in reporting low inflation does not influence the final numbers.

The financial consequences for investors can be severe. For example, the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index, against which many investment returns are measured, closed at a nominal high of 14,093 on Oct. 12, 2007. The media reported it as a sign of good things to come. On May 23, 2008, the Dow closed at 12,480 – off a bit, but apparently not too bad. But if that day’s close is adjusted for the official CPI, then it’s not worth 12,480, but only 9,856 when compared with its previous market cycle high, of 11,723, in the year 2000.

Worse still, if adjusted for the more likely but still conservative inflation rate of 8%, the recent close of 12,480 becomes the equivalent of only 6,742 in the year 2000. What looks like a nominal gain of some 757 points or 6.4% is, in fact, a real loss of 4,981 points or some 42% over those eight years!

One set of statistics that is impossible to distort are currency exchange rates, which have provided a somber report card on America’s economic fortunes. Not able to manipulate these numbers, the authorities instead distort their meaning, and have attempted to convince Americans that a weak dollar is in the national interest.

Those wise enough to ignore the spin, and see the falling dollar for what it is, namely a loss of wealth, have invested in good companies listed on the stock exchanges of producer nations, such as Australia, Canada and Switzerland – all countries with appreciating currencies. Such moves have greatly enhanced wealth and protected those investors against further dollar erosion.
[Editor’s Note: John Browne is the senior market advisor for Euro Pacific Capital Inc. For a more-detailed analysis of the nation’s financial problems, and the inherent dangers that these problems pose for both the U.S. economy and for dollar-denominated investments, click here to download Euro Pacific’s new financial-research report, “The Collapsing Dollar: The Powerful Case for Investing in Foreign Securities.” The report is free of charge. Peter D. Schiff, Euro Pacific’s president and chief global strategist, is a regular contributor to Money Morning, and most recently wrote about the oil crisis and China’s growing consumer class in his most recent Money Morning column.]

Source: The Statistical Battleground

Platinum was up, peaking at $2040 in late Hong Kong trading, but it slid in Europe, and plummeted in New York before recovering most of its lost ground to end at $2003/oz., down $4. Overnight, platinum has been trending lower.

Silver tracked gold, skidding from $16.90 in London to as low as $16.50 in New York, but it staged a better turnaround than gold, moving sharply higher to close at $16.77/oz., down just 2 cents. Overnight, silver has declined.
(Click here for charts)

It was a predictable day for the metals, since the usual suspects moved against them, with the dollar rising and oil prices coming off.

But one didn’t have to look far for the main reason for either the buck’s strength, crude’s drop or gold’s early weakness.

“The proximal cause of today’s drop in gold was … Bernanke’s comments regarding commodities and the dollar,” wrote Brien Lundin, editor of Gold Newsletter.

“The fact that he broke ranks with tradition and addressed the status of the dollar — which is the Treasury Secretary’s bailiwick — was remarkable enough to send a shudder through the gold and currency markets,” Lundin added.

Equally remarkable, perhaps, was the fact that gold did make at least a partial recovery from the plunge brought on by Big Ben’s remarks, while silver was barely down at all by day’s end.

But, no surprise, Kitco’s Jon Nadler accentuated the negative, writing that “comments by the Fed chairman echoed the sentiment that an unwelcome rise in inflation had raised the central bank’s levels of concern.”

Bernanke has drawn “ ‘a line in the sand’ as to the amount that the dollar could or should fall by, [and] effectively obviates the ‘death plunge’ in the currency that oil and gold had been eagerly awaiting since September,” Nadler said.

Thus, “the risk to the downside for gold has now been significantly augmented once again,” Nadler concluded.

But Mark O’Byrne, a of Gold and Silver Investments Ltd., might have been countering that very argument when he said that “no amount of jawboning by Bernanke or anyone else will help rectify the huge fundamental headwinds facing the U.S. economy in the face of a housing crash, huge deficits, huge credit and systemic risks and the increasing reality of stagflation.”

Source: Gold Declines on Bernanke Jawboning – But Silver Holds Up

The immediate reaction was for the dollar to rally and for gold and other commodities to sell off.

But think about it for a second.

Have things really changed? Have we suddenly now turned a corner and are about to get Paulson’s oft-talked-about, but never-delivered ’strong-dollar policy’? Has anything actually been done?

In a word, no.

“We are attentive to the implications of changes in the value of the dollar for inflation and inflation expectations,” said Ben Bernanke yesterday. “And will continue to formulate policy to guard against risks to both parts of our dual mandate, including the risk of an erosion in longer-term inflation expectations.”

Let’s have that again in English. “Yes, we have noticed that the dollar is going through the floor, and we are aware that we’re meant to care about inflation, and not just about the level of the Dow Jones.”

Could Bernanke have changed his inflationary philosophy overnight?

Strong words indeed. But the first thing to remember is that these were just words. They were not actions. Almost without exception, every action the Fed has taken in recent years, from lowering rates to injections of liquidity, has been to create inflation, not to fight it.

A man does not change his philosophy overnight. Let’s remind ourselves of Bernanke’s. In 2002 he said, “people know that inflation erodes the real value of the government’s debt and, therefore, that it is in the interest of the government to create some inflation.” It is also worth reminding ourselves of the unprecedented and dangerous levels of debt America holds, both individually and nationally. Inflating away the value of the currency has been and remains America’s easiest short-term solution to its problems.

If the Fed meant what they said about a strong dollar policy and fighting inflation, we would see Paul Volker-style interest rate rises (Volker was the Fed governor in the late 1970s and early 1980s, and had to take interest rates well into double-digit levels to combat inflation). But we are not seeing any such thing. Nor is any such thing possible in today’s debt-ridden environment. They would be crippling. What’s more they would be deflationary and deflation is something Bernanke will not tolerate. At Milton Friedman’s funeral he said regarding the deflationary 1930s, ‘You’re right. We did it. We’re very sorry. But thanks to you, we won’t do it again.’

How the Fed are putting the ‘con’ into confidence

The Fed seems to be trying to create a situation whereby they are seen to be fighting inflation, simply by not lowering rates any further. This is because, while the Fed may have no interest in fighting inflation, they have a big interest in fighting what they call ‘inflationary expectations’. In other words, they are more interested in fighting people’s perception of the problem, rather than the problem itself.

They seem to think if people do not see a problem, then there is no problem. As Ian McAvity puts it, they are putting the ‘con’ into confidence. It is the old politician’s trick of saying one thing and doing another. ‘Look over there,’ shouts the magician, the Wizard of Oz. ‘A strong dollar policy’. And everyone looks over there to see a strong dollar policy. Meanwhile, over here, a bucket load of money is emptied onto the audience.

The problem is that when inflation spread into homes and stocks, everything was just fine – unless you were a saver who rented of course. Now that inflation has moved from asset prices into energy and food, then there is a real problem for those who were unprepared, such as our very own Gordon Brown.

We saw the inflationary reaction of the Fed and the Bank Of England to the subprime crisis and the subsequent credit crunch. The notion that the worst is behind us is tosh. All that is behind us is the first wave of an ongoing financial crisis – perhaps a couple of cavalry charges. We still have the infantry, the artillery and the rest of the cavalry to get through before this is over.

The next wave will be in the form of a derivatives crisis: the oft-mentioned collateral debt obligations and credit default swaps. It is apparent that few people really understand what they are and how deep they go. That is bad news. Because it means when the crisis hits, people are more likely to panic. Panics tend to be disproportionate to the problem, particularly when trust in institutions has disappeared, as is the case with banks today.

Source: The Truth Behind Bernanke’s Fears for the Dollar

It is hard to reconcile the sunny optimism of CNBC with the grinding reality of the stock market. Where will earnings and growth come from in 2008? What sector? If inflation is out of control, are shares the best refuge? The stock market looks more and more nervous as investors try to sort all these things out.

The grim news Stateside is that the board of directors of Wachovia, the fourth largest bank in America, fired its CEO Ken Thompson. Wachovia lost US$708 million in the first quarter of 2008. It didn’t help Thompson that he engineered the acquisition of mortgage lender Golden West Financial in 2006—right at the peak of the mortgage lending bubble.

Thompson joins a long list of CEOs falling on their sword for thinking a credit boom would never end. It has. It’s still ending, in fact. Ratings agency Standard and Poor’s lowered the credit ratings of three big Wall Street firms earlier today. JP Morgan, Lehman Brothers, and Merrill Lynch were all downgraded because the S&P reckons the firms will have to take further asset write downs this year.

What did you expect? It’s a bear market in credit. The story comes straight from the department of news so obvious a rock would know it. What does it mean?

Well, a bear market in credit is bad for firms with heavily leveraged balance sheets. That includes most financial stocks. Why any investor would go bottom fishing in the financials when we still have a bear market in credit is beyond our feeble Tuesday-morning reckoning capabilities (still jet lagged).

Turning to our adopted homeland, we notice that other people are starting to get really worried about inflation. “Inflation rising at record rate,” reads a headline. “Inflation is rising at its swiftest pace on record,” according to a survey by TD Securities and the Melbourne Institute. You don’t say?

The RBA reckons inflation is running about 4.5% a year. It’s probably even higher than that, especially for people that eat, drive, get sick, and wear clothes. Hunger striking nudists who commute to work on bicycles are probably doing just fine. If there were only more of them.

There are comments by the usual morons on TV that the U.S. dollar is headed for a rally against the euro and the yen. This, the morons reckon, should lead to some “easing” in commodity prices. Oil eased itself up US$1.48 in early us trading, getting back on the north side of US$128. Gold eased itself up US$7 to just shy of US$900.

What if the dollar goes up against other currencies, but down against tangible assets? Is that even possible? Well of course it is!

The greenback weakened even more against oil and gold in the last few years than it did against the euro and the yen. Beware the false prophets of a dollar resurrection. They are looking at an incomplete picture because it’s more comforting.

How will shares behave if the global inflation bush fire becomes an inferno? Well, resource shares could melt up. The weak dollar is responsible for a lot of the nominal gains in commodity prices. But it’s not responsible for all those gains. Demand is too; especially demand from the 3.2 billion new industrial consumers in India and China, and the billion more in the next wave of industrializing countries.

We’d better be careful though. If people begin to think the central bank fight against inflation is lost, they will modify their behavior accordingly. This includes demanding higher wages to keep up with spiraling prices. And it includes trading cash for things before things get more expensive.

You’d be surprised how quickly the shelves of a supermarket can be picked to the bone when people become convinced (and afraid) that prices are going inevitably higher. There is probably not that much difference between the human genome and the locust genome.

Buy extra toilet paper.

And here’s a note we’ve been waiting to see. “Deal nears on iron ore price rise of BHP, Rio,” reports Jamie Freed in the Age. It looks like the Aussie miners are going to get something like a 95% increase from last year’s contract price. The Chinese steel makers won’t be happy about that. But if they don’t agree to a deal before June 30th, both Aussie ore titans are free to sell ore in the spot market, where prices are double the current contract price.

You can find more share market news from our pals over at Money Morning, who are all over the coal-seam-methane story. Until tomorrow…

Dan Denning
The Daily Reckoning Australia

Source: It’s a Bear Market in Credit

May, being a hard act to follow
God created June…

Peak this…peak that…

This just in from a Dear Reader, throwing our own words back in our face:

“‘Now, it appears that the gains from mechanization, bioengineering, chemistry and land clearing may have reached their limits. We may soon reach Peak Food’

“Now, let me ask: Has the DR morphed into a Marxist newsletter or something?”

Another reader was more flattering…

“Your writing reminds me of H.L. Mencken, after he had his stroke. But seriously, the one thing that marks human history…above all else…is the constant rise in population and the constantly improving technology to support it. I don’t see any reason why that basic theme should change. Peak Food? Don’t trouble yourself about it…”

Don’t worry about us, dear readers…we have not lost a wink of sleep to the peaks…neither Peak Oil nor Peak Food bothers us. No, it is not the peaks that disturb our sleep…it’s the valleys.

As our Dear Reader points out, we’ve faced peaks before. Many of them. Somehow we’ve made it over them – and then scooted down the other side. That’s how history works – like topography. Peaks, valleys, and broad, fertile plains. What more could you ask for?

We’ll return to the Peaks in a moment…but first let us look around…and get the lay of the land.

Oil sold off last week…and ended at $127. Gold rallied on Friday, but still ended the week considerably down.

Last week, we thought we saw an important break in the terrain. Speculators were betting that the Fed would reverse course and begin raising interest rates. This boosted the dollar, whacked gold, and sent the bond market tumbling. Lower bond prices come with higher yields; soon, the economy begins to sulk as if it had been punished.

“US mortgage rates leap ahead as investors bet on move from Fed,” is the headline in the Financial Times this morning. Thirty-year fixed-rate mortgages rose above 6% for the first time in nearly three months; jumbo mortgage money cost 7.21%. Ten-year notes, meanwhile, fell to yield more than 4%.

Ain’t markets wonderful, dear reader? All that hard work that the feds have been doing – all designed to keep rates low so that people would borrow more money; it can all be undone by a day’s trading!

“The surge in mortgage rates will make it more expensive to buy homes and less likely that existing homeowners will be able to refinance mortgages. That in turn, is likely to dampen hopes of an early recovery in the US housing market,” explained the FT .

What went wrong?

Ah…remember the “crude oil vigilantes?”

When the Fed began cutting rates last September, the price of oil shot up. High oil prices are now oozing into the entire economy…greasing up prices for everything from cucumbers to diapers. And the trends that held consumer prices down for so long are shoving them in the other direction. Labor costs were forced down, for example, as hundreds of millions of Asians entered the worldwide job market. But now those laborers are cooking with gas…and driving automobiles…and eating regular meals – competing with Americans for food and energy, and driving up prices even as the U.S. economy goes into a slump.

Here is the latest from the Associated Press :

“Indonesians are staging protests against shrinking gasoline subsidies in a nation where nearly half the population of 235 million lives on less than $2 a day. And there are now 887 million vehicles in the world, up from 553 million vehicles just 15 years ago, and on track to nearly double to a billion by 2012, according to London-based consultancy Global Insight.

“So as oil prices have soared, average U.S. [gasoline] prices have gone up 144 percent in the past five years – from $1.67 in May 2003 to $4.02 a gallon this month, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Over the same period, gas prices in France went up 117 percent to $9.66 a gallon.

“Proposals by U.S. presidential candidates John McCain and Hillary Clinton to suspend federal gas taxes this summer would lower the price tag – but have little effect on the underlying oil price. French President Nicholas Sarkozy has urged the EU to cut value-added tax on fuel.

“French fishermen and farmers, who need fuel for their trawlers and tractors, say their livelihoods are threatened by soaring prices and have blocked oil terminals around France and shipping traffic on the English Channel to demand government help. Italian, Portuguese and Spanish fisherman joined them and went on strike Friday. British and Bulgarian truckers are staging fuel protests, too.

“Turkey faces similar problems – and even higher prices – $11.29 a gallon, which for a full tank in a midsize car can reach nearly $200, enough for a domestic plane ticket.”

This is just the tip of the iceberg…keep reading here .

A Wall Street Journal story describes the CFTC “expanding surveillance of energy markets” to counter “potential oil-market manipulation.” The Journal notes that it’s unusual for the CFTC to announce an investigation in progress, so there’s a clear PR component to all this. Too bad there’s not a sanity component.

According to Rupert’s new rag:

Many economists and oil-industry executives say possible shenanigans by market traders have little or nothing to do with the high price of oil. They maintain that the rise is mainly due to fundamental factors such as rising demand, constrained supplies and the weak dollar.

Still, suspicions have lingered that speculators have helped drive oil prices higher. At a series of congressional hearings over the past month, energy consumer groups and some financial insiders have contended that large investments in commodity futures by hedge funds and pension funds are distorting prices.

After months of a building blame-game against “speculators” across nearly every commodity sector, I just want to tear my hair out when I see reporters posit these either-or explanations. Because, as even a middling UN bureaucrat can recognize, an increasingly worthless U.S. dollar is what’s driving hedge funds and pension funds to seek shelter in tangible goods.

But as long as this elephant in the room goes unrecognized and/or unacknowledged, we get pernicious proposals like that of Holy Joe Lieberman, aiming to limit the role of institutional investors in the commodities markets.

For more on all of this, check out Eric Fry and Paul Van Eeden in yesterday’s Rude Awakening. Don’t miss the chart tracking the oil price with M3.

Source: Blame the Speculators, Continued

Today is a holiday in Britain and America. But here at The Daily Reckoning, we are on the job – because there are things that need to be reckoned with.

Before we get down to serious reckoning, however, we give you a look at the news from the end of last week.

On Friday, the Dow fell another 145 points. Oil stuck around $132 and the dollar at $1.57 per euro. Gold rose to $925.

Remember when you could buy an ounce of gold for less than $100? We do. Remember when you could buy a gallon of gas for 25 cents? We do. What is Memorial Day for…but for remembering?

First, let us pause for a moment of silence, in honor of our ancestors, our veterans and our war dead. Like Pericles, we recognize that we have a big debt to the generations that went before us — their sacrifices have helped made us what we are…and made the country what it is. They saved. They invented. They built. What we see around us is mostly the result of their hard work…and many years of saving. If our ancestors had used up everything they produced, there would have been nothing left behind. But they didn’t. They left us their inventions and their constructions. They left us money, too. In the post-WWI period up until the mid-‘1980s, America was the world’s biggest creditor. More people owed more money to Americans than to any other nation. Public finances were occasionally stretched – such as during WWII itself – but from the founding of the republic almost until the Reagan years, each federal administration generally tried to leave the government cash till in about the same state it found it.

But in the space of a single generation, that huge legacy of capital and custom has been squandered. Now, the United States is the world’s greatest debtor – by a huge margin. Every year, it spends approximately 6% more than it earns. Its leaders have abandoned the virtuous practices of their ancestors. They no longer even pay them the homage of hypocrisy; they don’t even pretend to balance the budget, and the latest tally reported in these reckonings put the total unfunded liability at $61 trillion. This has effectively bankrupted the average family. It also turns every new baby in the U.S.A. into a major debtor – with more than $100,000 worth of unpaid bills –on the day he is born.

So we have a lot to remember this Memorial Day, and a lot to reckon with.

Warren Buffett was born in 1930. He must remember what the United States was like when it was still growing and genuinely prosperous.

“I’m fond of 1929,” said he a few months ago. “I was conceived that year and have always had an agreeable feeling towards the crash.”

Now, the richest man in the world, Buffett has come to Europe looking for better investments.

In an interview for Der Speigel, the Sage of the Plains said the United States was already in a recession and that it would be “deeper and longer than people think.”

He was in Madrid over the weekend, so we picked up a copy of El Pais to see what else he was saying.

When will growth in the U.S. economy pick up, the Spanish paper wanted to know?

“I have no idea,” Buffett replied.

When will the financial markets stabilize?” El Pais persisted.

“No idea about that either.”

So you see, Buffett could write for The Daily Reckoning; he would fit right in. Go ahead; ask us a question. We’ll give you the same answer Buffett gives:

We have no idea. But we do have opinions.

And in our opinion, George Soros is probably right when he says:

“The current financial crisis was precipitated by a bubble in the US housing market. In some ways it resembles other crises that have occurred since the end of the second world war at intervals ranging from four to 10 years. However, there is a profound difference: the current crisis marks the end of an era of credit expansion based on the dollar as the international reserve currency. The periodic crises were part of a larger boom-bust process. The current crisis is the culmination of a super-boom that has lasted for more than 60 years.”

*** Yes, it was a super-boom that Soros describes. And it coincided with your author’s life. He was born at the beginning of it. He has now reached what he thinks is the end of it. That financial super-boom also probably marked America’s great peak – when everything went so well for so long that politicians and central bankers all wanted to claim credit for it.

But the tippy top of the peak also coincided with a number of trends and events that made it possible. Among the most important was a low oil price. Back in the ‘70s, the price of oil went to $30 – and shocked the world. It stayed around that level for 5 years, long enough to convince people that it was permanent. Consumers – especially in Europe – learned to live with less energy. Oil companies spent fortunes to produce more. And then the price plummeted back to $10…and world enjoyed a great boom.

That boom seems to be over, it drowned in the rising tide of the oil price. The black goo has gone up $50 a barrel since last September. The world’s consumers and producers should simply take the price clue with good grace – cutting back consumption and looking for new supplies, just as they did in the ‘70s.

That is what is happening. The oil companies are spending four times as much on exploration as they did eight years ago. And consumers are being forced to cut back too. But it is not all that is happening. Central banks are fighting the correction with everything they have – and all they have is cheap money.

As you know, the combination of higher fuel prices…and lower housing prices…is squeezing America’s family. Comes news at the end of last week that the typical house in California is down 32% from a year ago. The state also has the second highest foreclosure rate in the nation, with one out of every 204 houses going back to lenders.

The other thing putting pressure on U.S. family budgets is the price of food. For the 15 years, up to 2007, food prices rose only 2.5% per year. This was the “Great Moderation” that central banks felt so proud of. But in the last 12 months, food prices are said to be up 4%.

The buck declined despite some upbeat news from the Institute for Supply Management. The ISM said nonmanufacturing sectors of the U.S. economy expanded during April after three months of contraction. Its services index rose to 52.0% from 49.6% in March. That handily beat economists’ projections for a decline to 49.4%.

Analysts believe traders were locking in their gains from last week’s rally, which was based on signals from the Federal Reserve that it is near the end of its interest-rate cuts. The dollar index, which charts the greenback against a basket of currencies, rose 2.5% last week.

Currency strategists at Brown Brothers Harriman are of the opinion that the “pieces of the puzzle we believe will contribute to a U.S. dollar uptrend this year are beginning to fall into place, but more pieces are needed for a more significant U.S. dollar rally.”

But the good feelings were diluted considerably by a report from the Federal Reserve on the credit crunch, which continues.

More than half of the banks surveyed by the Fed said they had tightened commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans, residential mortgages, and home-equity lines of credit. Almost no banks eased credit terms for any type of loan, the Fed said in its quarterly senior loan officer survey.

“The significant tightening of standards for consumer loans is probably the ugliest news of this report,” wrote Harm Bandholz, of UniCredit Markets. “Investment will continue to shrink, while private consumption growth will come to a halt or even turn negative” in the second quarter.

London ’s leading index headed straight up at the open adding 69 points at the open to 6,156 following a good day on Wall St. yesterday.

The Dow put on 189 points to close above 13,000 for the first time since the start of the year – no doubt a significant closing level for technical analysts. The gain came as financial stocks made the running and in spite of ExxonMobil shedding 3.6%. Exxon is struggling to up production reports the FT as it falls victim to resource nationalism. African production fell 20% after it was forced to hand over more to host governments and its Venezuelan interests were nationalised.

Continues below …

FLEET STREET LETTER ALERT

3 “Gloom-Loving Stocks” for the Coming Recession

Dark clouds are gathering over the UK economy.

But for contrarian-minded investors, this spells opportunity.

The Fleet Street Letter has just been given permission to share three such money moves with you today.

You can read the full briefing here

Forecasts are not a reliable indicator of future results. Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares, never risk more than you can afford to lose. Please seek independent financial advice if necessary. Fleet Street Publications Ltd. Customer Services: 0207 633 3600.

The bounce in US stocks reverberated around the time zones. The Nikkei was up over 2% to close above 14,000 and China’s leading index, the Shanghai Composite added almost 5% as it breaks out from a six month downtrend. European bourses are up across the board this morning.

So is it over? Or is this premature as the IHT suggests? Stock markets are forward looking by six months or so, so are presumable focused somewhere on the end of this year and the bulls see something better out there. But lest we get too carried away the world can look very different at street level. It was only on Monday that Warren Buffett was warning “ my general feeling is that the recession will be longer and deeper than most people think. This will not be short and shallow. I think consumers are feeling gas and food prices and not feeling they’ve got a lot of money for other things.”

Except perhaps for the one off “tax rebate” cheque sent to US taxpayers in the post this week. But some relief is coming too from a sector that of late has been a chronic thorn in the side of central bank inflation targets – the commodities market. Commodity prices have been falling of late across the board – energy, industrial and precious metals and agricultural commodities. The price of crude is down for a fourth day running with Brent Crude at $110 and West Texas light sweet crude a shade under $112. Lehman Bros said recently there was $20-30 of “hot money” in the crude price.

Why the pull back? It’s all about the dollar says commodity strategist, David Moore of Commonwealth Bank in Australia:

“The demand for investing in commodities as a hedge for U.S. dollar weakness has faded.”

Which gives us a clue as to the nature of the demand. There’s actual physical demand for commodities according to their use and then there’s more speculative investment demand. With the revival of interest in the sector, how much of the price is attributed to each? We don’t know but given the rapid rise in popularity of the commodity exchange-traded fund, we suspect the balance has tilted significantly in recent years towards the speculator.

That fading interest in hedging has helped the dollar claw itself back from a low point at 1.60 to the euro, to 1.54 now. When even central bankers are telling the market it’s not so bad, investors worries are starting to subside. Says Japanese fund manager Tetsu Emori:

“Worries about the financial market turmoil and even an economic slowdown seem to be softening, so that’s why people are selling gold.”

As such gold continues its slide south, at one point unwinding all the way to its $850 price at the start of the year. Just as the dollar stages something of a rally, the Gulf States may finally be coming to the conclusion that pegging to it is not after all such a good idea as dollar weakness adds to their domestic inflation problems. Something even Alan Greenspan actually advised them to do on a visit to the region. Kuwait has been the only one to drop its peg to date and has seen its currency appreciate almost 8% against the dollar since. Its Finance Minister Mustafa al-Shimali seems confident other Gulf Cooperation Council states will follow its lead – “some countries will do what we are doing.”

Here at home, the winds of political change look to have blown pretty hard yesterday. UK government worries about taking a pasting from the electorate in the local elections proved well founded. They did – their worst result for 40 years. With the Mayoral vote still pending, it could prove a very black day for New Labour. Still after 11 years in government you take some wear and tear, mistakes are made, support disintegrates, people get disillusioned or just fed up with the same old faces.

And it doesn’t help when the much touted UK economic miracle that has notched up 60 consecutive quarters of growth is looking a good deal less miraculous. The progressive puncturing of inflated house prices, aided and abetted by a mortgage famine is exposing gradually testing the debt-laden underbelly of once enthusiastic consumers. British bank HBOS announced house prices fell by 3.7% annualised over the year to April. It is the worst housing market performance since 1993 and comes on top of a controversial scrapping of the 10% starter tax rate. Who’s to blame? The government, of course. Much to the delight of the Tories for whom the ERM debacle is now but a fading memory.

Regards,

Rob Mackrill
The Daily Reckoning

Be the first to comment on this article! Now you can post your thoughts, reactions and views on the topics we talk about.
To comment, click here.

Steve called these bargain-hunting foreigners “the new saviors of America,” because they were propping up prices in U.S. malls.

A similar spending spree is taking place in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry… and I think it’s going to mean big profits for biotech investors. Let me explain…

Early last week, British drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline gobbled up Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, a tiny Massachusetts-based biotech, at a whopping 84% premium. The deal was all cash.

———- Advertisement —————–
This One-Page Federal Letter has Predicted 58 of the Most Shocking Stock Swings THIS DECADE…

At first glance, it looks like any other piece of Government mail…

But this seldom-publicized and seldom-understood Federal Letter holds the secret to the easiest returns you’ll ever see in the US stock market.

Dr. George Huang – a PhD trader and former VC – has spent the past 12 months studying this letter, and discovered the secret to making money from it.

The next letter arrives on April 30th.

For more information, click here.
———————————————-

The really crazy thing is that Sirtris has no chance of selling any products for at least five years. Heck, Sirtris only has one compound in clinical trials… and that’s in the earliest Phase I safety testing stage. Most of its “drug candidates” are still being tinkered with in the lab.

So, why was GSK willing to shell out $22.50 per share for a company that went public just 11 months earlier at $10? GSK will tell you – “great science.” But as you know, the real answer is the cheap dollar.

No American drug company – Merck, Pfizer, or Bristol Myers – could have afforded to pay so much for so little. But like the holiday shoppers Steve described, GSK can pony up such a premium because, by paying in pounds sterling, it essentially got Sirtris half-off.

GSK’s fellow British drugmaker, AstraZeneca, made a similar deal last spring. It bought Maryland-based MedImmune for a staggering 12 times sales – a 60% premium.

As the dollar continues to sag against world currencies, the British aren’t the only ones eying U.S. biotech assets… Japanese drugmaker Takeda Pharmaceuticals coughed up a 53% premium to buy Boston-based Millennium Pharmaceuticals. Its peer Eisai scooped up U.S.-based MGI Pharma for 10 times sales.

This year, U.S. health care firms have seen $80 billion in merger and acquisition deals… 60% came from foreign buyers. This is not a trend I expect to let up anytime soon.

As I’ve written before, the world’s largest drugmakers are in trouble. Expiring patents, generic competition, and anemic pipelines all point to a bleak future for Big Pharma. At this point, buying up biotechs is the only choice they have. And they’re going to have to pay huge “knock out” premiums to outbid their competition.

Now, with lots of extra dollars in the bank, foreign companies are flooding U.S. biotechs with rich cash offers, even if it means paying shareholders astronomical premiums. The entire industry is going in one direction – up. It may be a bad time to own dollars, but it’s a great time to be in biotech.

Good investing,

Rob Fannon