Humor me. Let’s crunch those numbers.

Those gold certificates have a book value of about US$14 billion, if you include special drawing rights and coin holdings ($1.7 billion). Even if you revalued this inventory, it would still total less than $300 billion, or 12% ofthe Fed’s total assets. So far, that’s a weak defense against our allegations. And it only goes downhill from there. Assuming it still got the goods at all, a lot has changed in just three months. In August, this gold had a market value that represented over 30% of the Fed’s assets.

Back then, additionally, U.S. Treasury securities still made up half the Federal Reserve’s asset base.

Today, however, in a very short space of time, the market value of both of these assets together comprises just 30% of the central bank’s total assets. It is fruitless to discuss what makes up the rest of its “portfolio,” because whatever it is, it is of lesser quality — aka higher risk.

His proposal was interesting, however, for other reasons. In case you missed its inference, the idea of a revaluation in gold reserves on the Fed’s balance sheet is to boost confidence. It is but a keyboard stroke away, a technical matter. Most analysts already take gold’s market value into account anyway.

Still, two outcomes of such a revaluation occurred to me over and above the obvious, I think.

The first: It would align the Fed’s interests with gold prices — by increasing gold prices, it would boost the value of its balance sheet, for instance.

Second, it would inflate gold’s perceived importance — an endorsement of sorts, in the eyes of the Fed. The public and the market would have to reassess their fundamental outlook about the importance of gold, too.

On the surface, Gramley’s proposal aims at making the Fed look like some kind of gold standard bank. But in fact, this kind of thing, especially if it were spun out in reaction to a crisis of confidence, might be so bullish for gold that it sinks the Fed.

If Bernanke were smart, he would want that gold to disappear off the balance sheet without notice.

But let’s forget about what would be bullish for gold and point out what in fact is the fear of deflation.

The Great Reinflation Update

In December, the Fed shoveled another couple hundred billion new Washingtons into the banking system, out of its many open windows. B-r-r-r!

Its balance sheet expanded to over $2.3 trillion as of last week’s report, which came out the day after it decided to cut rates to nothing. My guess is that we’ve seen nothing yet. You thought “cheap money” was bad. This is the era of FREE money. This stuff grows on trees. You don’t even need choppers. Already, despite the intensity of the deflation rhetoric, the money supply numbers continue to point the other way — toward the Great Reinflation. Or should we say “because” of the intensity of the deflation rhetoric!

This week’s money supply numbers suggest the alleged credit freeze continues to thaw.

After stagnating with little or no growth, stuck at under $1.4 trillion over the past four years (since the Fed began hiking rates in 2004), even as the Federal Reserve started cutting rates in 2007 again, U.S. M1 has grown by over $130 billion, or 10%, since August alone. That’s when it stopped sterilizing its “liquidity” injections. But this kind of growth in three months is a record. Percentage-wise, too.

Most of that growth, moreover, is occurring in checkable (demand) deposits. U.S. M2 is growing at almost $100 billion per month, and it is approaching a 9% year-over-year growth rate — its strongest growth since early 2002, midway through the Fed’s last reinflation effort (2001-03).

Most of that growth is occurring in money market fund holdings.

The definitions of money supply that I put stock in suggest that the banking system is inflating deposits at roughly5% year over year, but of special significance is that this growth rate is picking up now.

It certainly is not as robust as the narrow measures of money or the Fed’s balance sheet.

But it is not deflation.

I promise to keep looking for it, nevertheless.

Source: The Great Reinflation

This from The Sovereign Society:

Your bank is a counterfeiter, as facilitated by the Federal Reserve System and permitted by the government that allegedly represents you.

The lie of fractional reserve banking is at the heart of our ‘banking’ system. And its acceptance as fact or necessity by the world’s populace is the basis on which most other economic lies and myths gain so much credibility.

To understand why we’re in so much trouble right now, and why the privately owned Federal Reserve Banks are to blame, one must understand fractional reserve banking, and why it amounts to little more than counterfeiting.

King Edward II, Goldsmiths and “Legal” Counterfeiting

For all of history through to the 1800s, goldsmiths were the world’s primary bankers. It made sense in those hard money days to keep your gold with the fellow who molded it into coins and acted as the community’s central cash register.

So here we have the goldsmiths…guardians of bullion and protectors of everyone’s wealth. I’ve personally always seen this as the primary function of a bank.

But just guarding money and issuing certificates for it…I suppose it just didn’t pay as well as it could. That and you always end up with a huge pile of cash (gold) that’s just sitting around and not really doing anything other than backing promissory notes. So the goldsmiths got crafty, and at this point they became the bankers we know today.

They started issuing more certificates than they could back in gold, allowing them to collect interest on the physical gold collecting dust in their shop… gold that already belonged to someone else. But weren’t there already certificates attached to that gold? Of course. But the bankers believed those certificates wouldn’t all be cashed in at the exact same time, so they could get by and no one would ever be the wiser.

This is the critical point in our story, and at few points in history has the difference between right and wrong been so very clear.

The value of goldsmith’s notes was in the gold behind them. So when they issue a new note backed by…well backed by nothing other than the supposition that they’d have enough inventory to pay it off if it fell through…they were engaging in wishful thinking, at best. Ladies and gentlemen, I give you irrational exuberance. At the very core of our banking system.

But how could the goldsmiths get away with such blatant counterfeiting? Didn’t anyone realize that they were pulling wealth from thin air, that they were trading worthless notes for valuable goods? Well, the governments knew. Why didn’t they do anything to stop the goldsmiths?

Put clearly; it wasn’t in the interest of the world’s ruling monarchs to stop them. King Charles II of England had his own con game going with the bankers…one where they traded him physical gold for sticks of wood (I’m not kidding at all…we’ll be covering government debt next week.)

So by complying with the government’s con games and ponzi schemes, the goldsmiths earned themselves a back-scratching from the world’s monarchs, received in the form of Fractional Reserve Banking.

The Whole World Falling for the Same Tricks…500 years later

And so we arrive at the modern-day. The Dollar is the world’s reserve currency, making us in some sense the world’s goldsmith. And we have a Federal Reserve System – composed of privately owned member banks – that represents how cloudy and convoluted the relationship between governments and banks has become in the last half-millennium.

But somehow, the world economy keeps falling for the same scam.

You see, the Federal Reserve controls not only the interest rate at which banks are allowed to lend, but the fractional reserve ratios they’re required to keep (as a percentage of their reserves).

Let’s backpedal for a second here… make it even simpler. An institution composed of banks and their representatives is in control of not only our money supply, but the amount of new money (in the form of loans issued) that banks are allowed to ‘counterfeit’ and the interest they’re required to charge on those conjured-from-nowhere dollars.

Interest rates – when the decision is left to the borrower and the lender – represent the time preferences and assumed risk of borrower and lender. Like the price of any other good, the interest rate of a loan ideally represents a compromise for both parties in terms of time and risk.

But when the government intervenes with a mandated interest rate (like Greenspan’s sub-zero “liquidity experiment”) those decisions to lend and borrow are often made with little or no consideration to time and risk. Since the money is cheap, free, or the government might even be paying you to take it, incentives are changed across the board.

And then fractional reserve banking comes in. Since the banks only have to keep a percentage of their reserves – a ratio set by an institution they own…making them essentially self-governing – these ridiculously low interest rates spur the banks into a lending frenzy.

Lending to and from each other, commercial interests and private parties, the banks go hog-wild. Without the restraint of reasonable lending costs, they lend as much credit against your money as humanly possible, flooding the economy with fresh dollars that never existed before.

Euphoria takes over. Of course housing prices will continue to go up when the pool of dollars chasing those houses is growing so rapidly…that’s just common sense. But many of us bought into it, in some way or another. And that’s what makes the coming correction so painful.

The M3 Chart:
Ever wonder why the government dropped it a few years ago?

Because of the one-two punch of mandated interest rates and fractional reserve banking, an epic amount of bad business decisions are inevitably made. That’s a simple truth of economics… no matter who tries to ignore it.

But what can I do?

Well, it’s pretty easy actually. Just don’t believe all the hype, take everything with a grain of salt, and make your own decisions. I’m not telling you to protest at your local federal reserve bank, I’m just saying you should use reason and that you shouldn’t take most things at face value.

Like when the keepers of our national pocketbook – and thereby our national sovereignty – are run by the very banks they’re supposed to govern, and those banks (whose original purpose was to guard the money of the people) have a balance sheet that looks like this:

You should be asking questions.

When our government gives a US$25 Billion bailout to Citigroup (NYSE:C), and then the company’s market capitalization is listed at around US$20 Billion shortly before the company is taken over… you should certainly be asking questions.

When Detroit’s CEOs fly to Washington in separate luxury jets, and they beg for US$75 Billion in bailout money for companies with a combined market capitalization of less than US$10 Billion…you should be asking questions.

There’s a heist going on out there… and plans are afoot. Through the careful control of information sources, those in power can control the actions of the masses. But you don’t have to be a part of the masses.

To make the difference and speak out on the part of personal sovereignty, The Sovereign Society’s Chairman John Pugsley has assembled this comprehensive report to tell you about a few of their most dangerous and pervasive of lies. I urge you to have a look.

Regardless of whether you voted for the current President. Regardless of whether or not you like or even trust our country’s political and economic systems. You need to give this special information enough of your time to understand the grim situation you could be facing. Not just for your sake, but for the sake of the Sons & Daughters of America, now being laden with years and years of debt.

Source: Fractional Reserve Banking a.k.a. Counterfeiting

This from The Daily Reckoning:

To give you an idea of the wild measures undertaken by the feds, we look at what is happening at the world’s leading bank – the US Federal Reserve.

The short form of how the Fed operates is this: it holds a certain amount of securities in its vault; this is the cornerstone capital – or monetary base – of the whole banking structure. How does it get this capital? It buys it, creating the money to pay for it as necessary. Naturally, the Fed doesn’t want to create too much money or the inflation rate would get out of control and economists would point their fingers accusingly. But now, people fear dandruff more than inflation. So, the Fed has gone wild.

From the day of its founding in 1913 to September 24, 2008 the Fed’s assets – the aforementioned cornerstone capital for the US financial system – grew to $1 trillion. By November 14, 2008 the amount had grown to over $2 trillion. And in a speech in Texas, the head of the Dallas branch of the Fed said he expected the total to reach $3 trillion by year end.

For the moment, this explosion of monetary inflation is hardly noticed. Asset deflation has the headlines. People worry about having too few dollars, not about having too many.

Comes the news this morning that US business chiefs are asking the up-coming Obama administration for another $500 billion ‘stimulus’ program. They’ll get it. And much more. Trillions worth.

Trying to stimulate the economy with easier credit in the early 2000s, Alan Greenspan overdid it. He gave the world the credit it wanted, and created the biggest bubble in human history.

Now that bubble is collapsing and his successor – Ben Bernanke – is confronted with a new problem. Now it is cash that people want – income to pay their debts! Bernanke will give them what they want. And, most likely, he will overdo it too.

Source: Into The Wild

This from Whiskey & Gunpowder:

Under Bernanke’s direction, the Federal Reserve has completely rewritten its mission. Many articles in the International Speculator and The Casey Report have reported the strange growth in the loans they have made and explained that Bernanke has, for a long time, espoused unconventional actions to avert deflation and to expand the economy. So the charts below tell that story, and it is truly amazing.

The Federal Reserve was never envisioned to be lender of last resort to a whole slew of investment banks, money market mutual funds, and commercial paper issuers.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Special~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Your Personal Bailout Package Is Here

The greatest economic crisis ever is still gathering power…what’s going on today is just a precursor.

The time bomb of our national deficits is still ticking away. Don’t be caught unprepared.

Our offer is currently exclusive to Agora readers, but only until Dec 21 when we make it available to the general public.

Click here to read more…

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The situation is not easy to sort out, for the simple reason that the extent of their actions is not presented by the Fed via clear and concise data. Instead, the data is complex and hard to analyze, partly because of the piecemeal way the actions were taken, but also probably due to a desire by the Fed to avoid public scrutiny and criticism.

Digging into the details of the Fed’s balance sheet reveals, however, the complete change of composition and direction of the Fed. The most obvious change is that they have doubled the size of their assets and liabilities. A year ago, the Fed’s assets consisted almost entirely of government Treasuries and a little gold.

That is a clean, safe balance sheet.

The only important liability was the currency they issued (our paper dollars). They also had a small reserve of deposits from all the banks. When Greenspan wanted to give the economy a boost by lowering short-term interest rates, he would create some money and buy Treasuries. He could also do the reverse.

Bernanke has turned this upside down. Initially he made focused loans to big banks. But then the loans became bigger than the reserve deposits, leaving the banks in total as net borrowers. The concept of a fractional reserve no longer applies when the reserve is net negative.

To fund yet more loans, Bernanke then sold off half of the Fed’s Treasuries. And he traded Treasuries for toxic waste of poor-quality mortgage-backed securities. And he encumbered half of the remaining Treasuries with “off balance sheet” swaps of about $220 billion. (Does this sound like Enron accounting?) The balance sheet started with $800 billion of mostly reliable assets and now has about $250 billion of unencumbered Treasuries.

The biggest source of funding is from the Treasury. Banks are leaving deposits in the Fed now that the Fed is paying interest.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Special~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Get Gold Cheap… Before It Takes Off Again

Gold is giving you another chance to get in for the inevitable ride up at a bargain.

Here’s how to get it at a discount and multiply those gains.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The important conclusion is that the paper dollars are now issued by a far less soundly structured Fed, an organization that is more interested in bailing out the financial community than defending the dollar.

This chart below compares last year’s assets, which were mostly Treasuries, to this year’s twice-as-large and far more questionable mix:

The other side of the balance sheet shows that the Fed has borrowed and taken in deposits to fund the loans that are as big as the issuance of currency. In effect, the Fed has doubled its footprint and doubled its responsibilities. Mostly under the covers, they added almost $1 trillion in new credit to the financial world in about two months.

There are additional important Fed actions not included in their balance sheet. For example, they invented a Money Market Investor Funding Facility (MMIF) to guarantee up to 90% of $600 billion of loans to that sector. They do this through special-purpose vehicles established by the private sector (PSPVs). The latest Commercial Paper Funding Facility (CPFF) started October 27 and has issued $143 billion so far. These are both in addition to the Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility initiated September 19. The programs are beyond keeping up with.

Nothing like this has ever been done before by the Federal Reserve. In time, the consequences in terms of confidence in the dollar will be bad.

Source: Backfield in Motion at the Fed