Olivier Garrett (Casey Research):

Ben Bernanke is a dubious choice to be named “Person of the Year” by Time magazine.  While Time’s Managing Editor Richard Stengel credits him with recognizing early and reacting appropriately to the ongoing financial crisis, in reality, he was wrong time and again with both his predictions and his remedies. Just remember these gems:

• On July 1, 2005, Bernanke stated without hesitation that we were not experiencing a housing bubble: “I think what is more likely is that house prices will slow, maybe stabilize, might slow consumption spending a bit.”
• November 2005, on derivatives: “With respect to their safety, derivatives, for the most part, are traded among very sophisticated financial institutions and individuals who have considerable incentive to understand them and to use them properly.” And “the Federal Reserve’s responsibility is to make sure that the institutions it regulates have good systems and good procedures for ensuring that their derivatives portfolios are well managed and do not create excessive risk in their institutions.”
• February 15, 2006: “Housing markets are cooling a bit. Our expectation is that the decline in activity or the slowing in activity will be moderate, that house prices will probably continue to rise.”
• February 2008: “I expect there will be some failures of smaller banks” (Bear Stearns collapsed a couple of weeks later).
• But then again, I guess in regards to his nomination we are talking about achievements in 2009. That was the year Bernanke said, “Currently, we don’t think [the unemployment rate] will get to 10 percent.”

This is the same chairman of the Federal Reserve who told us that Fannie and Freddie were “adequately capitalized” and “in no danger of failing.”  

Unfortunately, he has not just been wrong about housing, unemployment, banking, and derivatives — his policies have directly contributed to all of the problems we now face.

High unemployment and the weak dollar threaten to further undermine our economy, yet his policy is to just keep borrowing. The massive debt his policies have foisted on the American taxpayer is weakening the U.S.’s position as global economic leader and hurting already tenuous relations with foreign governments. Bernanke has supported the policies of Greenspan and our current and previous administrations – the very policies that got us into this mess.  He has supported the leveraging of the American economy to rescue companies long past saving and the  borrowing of billions from foreign governments to line the pockets of corrupt investment bankers. 

I could recommend a few alternative names for runner-up, if Time’s criteria are really as dubious as they appear:

• Lloyd Blankfein from Goldman Sachs for robbing taxpayers legally
• Rick Wagoner of GM for taking the world’s largest car maker to bankruptcy in a quarter-century
• Tim Geithner for ensuring that all of our bankers prospered during the worst financial crisis since the ‘30s
• Tiger Woods for providing the nation with great dinner conversations and helping to spur tabloid sales.

Bernanke is insistent on using inflation to make our personal debts seem small, all the while setting the country up for a much larger disaster long term. Bernanke is borrowing from Peter to pay Paul… and robbing taxpayers to pay Peter. 

As you may have noticed, the government will not save you from the reverberations of a declining U.S. economy. You’ll have to take matters into your own hands… and no one is better at pointing the way than the editors of The Casey Report. No matter how dire the economic trend, double- or triple-digit gains within 12 to 24 months are easy if you discover the right opportunities to profit. Find out more by clicking here.

Bill Bonner (The Daily Reckoning, UK):

Gold rose $15 yesterday. What to make of it?

Perhaps it was because Ben Bernanke’s extended his “extended period” pledge?

He said, in effect, if this economy doesn’t come out of its slump, it won’t be his fault. He’ll keep monetary policy as loose as possible for as long as possible. Not that we had any doubt about it. He has a theory. It’s a bad theory, but it’s all he has. And it tells him that you fight a depression with loose money.

So, what do you expect? Interest rates will remain artificially low as long as Bernanke can get away with it… or until the depression ends… whichever comes sooner.

That said, he hardly has to lift a finger. Judging from the last auction of short-term Treasury debt, lenders can’t think of anything better to do with their money than to give it to the government – in return for nothing. The last auction produced a yield of zero on one-month loans.

We went to visit a pair of clever Swiss bankers yesterday. These fellows manage money for clients all over the world. What do they think? They were focused on stocks:

“This year, the people who made the most money were those who were most heavily invested in equities. And if the patterns of the past hold up, 2010 will be a good year for equities too.

“Whenever the ten-year performance goes close to zero, the next few years tend to be very good for stock market investors.

“In fact, there has never been an exception, going all the way back to 1881. Last year was one of the worst years in stock market history. This has been one of the best. And next year should be one of the best too.”

He handed us a chart to illustrate his point. It shows the 10-year performance of the stock market.

We see that very rarely are stock market returns negative over a 10-year period. In fact, there are only two worth mentioning. One was in the ‘30s, when in August ‘39 stocks had returned MINUS 4.68% for the previous ten years.

The other major losing period came in February of this year, when investors had gotten an average annual return of -3.43% since 1999.

The message seems simple enough. When the market turns down sharply… expect a sharp turn-up to follow. But studying the chart more carefully, we see two things.

Click here for the rest of Mr. Bonner’s commentary on The Daily Reckoning, UK Edition.

Baltimore — (TFN): It’s not an award I would want. First Putin, then Obama, now Bernanke. Big Ben is not joining the best of company with his “Person of the year” award. If history is an indication, the Fed boss’ approval rating will be significantly lower in the next twelve months.

As if being the master of the secret domain known as the Federal Reserve isn’t a hard enough job to handle, Time goes and slaps Bernanke on the cover and tells us the award is due not because of where Bernanke got us today, but because of where we have not ventured.

In other words, it’s like giving out a Nobel Prize to a guy with big plans for humanity, never mind the fact the goal of world peace is further away than ever before and Iran proved today it is just a step away from nuking Israel.

I am not sure what Time’s policy is on awarding this title posthumously, but it may be something worth investigating. After all, the true ramifications of letting one, unelected politically motivated man in charge of a great nation’s monetary future isn’t a near-sighted event. It could be a while to we learn Bernanke’s true merit.

Who knows, this time next year, China’s president, Hu Jintao, could be gracing the glossy’s cover as we hail his decision to extend our debt obligations for just a couple more years while we get things back on track.

I am not saying Bernanke didn’t do a decent job. I’m saying we should wait before sending him any praise. Last I checked, one out of every ten of my fellow Americans was in the unemployment line and currency risk is rising across the globe.

But that can’t have anything to do with free money flowing from the Fed, can it?

*** By now, you’ve got to know my thoughts on gold… sell the stuff. I was all about the precious metal this time last year, but that was a different situation and time. Now, you can’t turn on the radio, TV or open the newspaper without hearing some pitchman’s take on the stuff.

Remember the contrarian motto: when everybody else wants in, you want out.

For those of you that are viewers of late-night cable news parodies, I am a huge fan of Comedy Central’s Colbert Report. When trends get out of control, his dry humor has a way of bringing things back to Earth.

That’s why when Colbert talked about the sudden rush to the gold markets this week, I knew we were in trouble.

Here’s what I told TFN readers this morning:

“Finally an up day for gold. After sliding for nearly two weeks, the precious metal is moving far enough into positive territory today to bother noting it.

“Did Glen Beck up his marketing? Did Rush bring on a few more listeners? Or is this yet another example of the Colbert bump?

“Does it even matter? Nope, when gold is getting this much attention, the only thing that matters is how quickly you dump your position.

“Gold is supposed to be the safest investment around. Just as real estate investors love to say, there is only so much of the stuff. Unfortunately, we all know how well the real estate folks are doing these days.

“Back in the day when gold actually backed the nation’s debt and played an integral role in the monetary system, a horde of gold made sense. But today, when it’s only value comes from the fact we say its valuable, gold’s no different than a fiat currency.

“If the economy collapses like so many gold bugs are sure is about to happen, wouldn’t you rather have something of tangible value? Colbert is right. Sheep are the way to go. Better yet, follow the natives and take advantage of a buffalo’s ability to provide food and shelter.

“While I’m pushing the argument over the top, many investors are using similar logic in their bullish pursuit of gold. It has created a micro-bubble that is ready to burst.

“That is not good news for the investors that have piled into the junior gold miner sector.”

Keep reading to learn why.

*** I cannot believe this is not getting more press. If you think a handful of bank failures dealt a blow to your portfolio, wait until you see what happens when a few heavy-hitting governments begin to drop.

The good-old-boy network is alive and well on Wall Street. Just about every major financial firm has some vested interest in its “competition.” But it is nothing like the international scene where friendships and rivalries date back centuries and nuclear weapons are used as bargaining tools.

Less than a month ago, Dubai started the default-scare trend. Since then, we’ve heard from Greece, Austria and Spain. Earlier this week, Mexico made the list when Standard and Poor’s cut our southern neighbor’s credit rating.

This is not good news. It proves that, although the dollar looks weak, it’s stronger than its competition. In all things financial, value is relative.

Over the next few weeks, the dollar is going to strengthen, the Dow will drop and gold bugs will wonder what all the hoopla was about.

With most investors working on polishing their year-end portfolio, now is a good time to get in position to take advantage of the upcoming action. Come January 1, it’s a whole new game.

Chuck Butler (The Daily Reckoning):
As I checked the currencies throughout the day yesterday, I noticed that as the day went on, the non-dollar currencies were stronger, led by the Big Dog, euro (EUR)… But then late last night, and I mean late last night, I checked them, and those gains had been wiped out.

So, when I arrived here this morning, I had one thing on the top of my list of things to do, and that was to find out what happened… Come on, I said to myself, it had to be more than the “risk on, risk off” stuff that’s been hanging over the markets like the Sword of Damocles! But, when you get right down to the nitty gritty, that’s all it was… For once again, there was some data, or story, or rumor, that spooked the markets into believing the global recovery isn’t going to happen, and the “risk off” came into play.

So what was it that spooked the markets… Well… The only thing I can find was the report yesterday about falling Housing Starts that Chris told you about… Did you know that about 14% of US homeowners were either delinquent on their mortgage or in some stage of foreclosure? That is the highest rate since the group started collecting the data in 1972!

But there was something else that was announced as the day went on, that I think probably spooked the markets more than anything else… And that is a key House panel approved two amendments to a sweeping financial-overhaul bill that would give federal watchdogs new authority to audit the Federal Reserve, and would establish a fund of as much as $200 billion to help dissolve large, troubled institutions. Rep. Ron Paul (R., Texas) offered the amendment seeking to subject the Fed to audits.

The House Financial Services Committee voted 41-28 to approve the amendments, wrapping up weeks of debate but postponing a final vote on the bill until after Thanksgiving.

OK… More deficit spending for sure, and I’m positive that this was “hung on this bill” to audit the Fed as the only way it would get through the gauntlet.
Click here to finish Mr. Butler’s article at The Daily Reckoning.

Don Miller (Money Morning):
The U.S. Federal Reserve may take an unorthodox approach to raising interest rates by paying interest on bank reserves rather than relying on traditional open market remedies, as it exits from its long-term fiscal stimulus programs, Reuters reported today (Tuesday).

Paying interest on reserves is mostly untested and would represent an unexpected twist in the Fed’s response to the financial meltdown.

“In the old days … the Fed controlled the federal funds rate with open market operations,” Antulio Bomfim, a former Fed economist now with Macroeconomic Advisors LLC in Washington told Reuters. “Now, at least in this period when reserves are over-abundant, the way the Fed hopes to raise the federal funds rate will be primarily by raising the interest rate it pays on reserves.”

Usually, when the central bank wants to set a target for the federal funds rate it buys or sells Treasury securities on the open market, influencing interest rates by deploying or withdrawing capital.

By paying interest on reserves, the Fed makes it attractive for banks to keep their money at the central bank as long as interest rates in private markets are lower.

By doing that, the Fed can put a floor under the lending rate that banks charge each other for overnight loans, which is the central bank’s traditional choice for influencing the economy. Open market operations to raise interest rates would be relegated to a supporting role in the initial stages of tightening.

In order to spark an economy mired in deep recession . . . Click here to read the rest of Mr. Miller’s article.

Yesterday, we had a couple of Fed Heads talking, but the Big Kahuna stood out and moved the markets with his statements… Here’s the skinny…

Big Ben was giving a speech, and said, “The Fed will monitor closely the currencies, and the Fed’s policies will ensure that the dollar is strong.” Now, when he first uttered those words, the dollar got bought and the non-dollar currencies were sold… But then, a few of us had this feeling… It was a feeling that we had heard all this before… And there – in the archives, circa June 2008 – Bernanke said, “In collaboration with our colleagues at the Treasury, we continue to carefully monitor developments in foreign exchange markets.” Wait! We won’t get fooled again!

In June 2008, his statements spooked the markets into believing the Fed was really going to do something to bolster the dollar… But when nothing came along, the dollar REALLY got sold until the financial meltdown of August 2008… I mean… What has the Fed done in the past 1 1/2 years to “bolster the dollar”? Near zero interest rates that will remain in place for longer than they should… Quantitative easing… A bloated balance sheet of toxic bonds.

You could see the V-8 moments on traders’ faces when they realized, yesterday, that all this had been said before, and nothing came of it, so… We won’t get fooled again!

So, then traders reversed their buying of the dollar and sent the dollar to the woodshed. You should have seen the reversal… It was amazing…

Click here to read the rest of Mr. Butler’s article.

But we’re not…yet.

Classic economic theory says that money supply can be used to stimulate the economy and our central bankers seem to agree. That’s why they’ve pumped more than $1 trillion dollars into the economy, engineered countless bailout bonanzas for zombie institutions, put Detroit on life support, and delivered a bunch of financial Band-Aids to the trauma ward — all in a desperate bid to make Americans feel better about the global financial crisis.

To their way of thinking, the trillions of dollars have been a success. That’s why any meeting of the Group of Eight (G8) nations looks more like a mutual affection society with central bankers anxious to claim credit and backslap each other in congratulations for having avoided the “Great Depression II.”

But by taking the Federal balance sheet to more than $2 trillion from $928 billion 2008, they’ve created a situation that should have resulted in an epic inflationary spike to accompany the 137% increase in liabilities.

Yet that hasn’t quite happened.

Core inflation — which denotes consumer prices without food and energy costs — has actually decreased from 2.5% in 2008 to 1.5% presently. And that has many investors who have heard the siren call of the doom, gloom and boom crowd wondering if they’re worried about nothing.

So what gives?

Well, there are four reasons we haven’t yet seen hyperinflation:

Click here to continue reading Mr. Fitzgerald’s article.

Precious metals have always been intriguing to investors because they tend to hold their value. In times of geopolitical crisis or currency devaluation, for example, the value of paper money might fluctuate, but a hard asset will always be worth something. As a result, historically, precious metals have been considered a “safe haven” in times of economic and financial instability.

That brings us to why gold is on a tear today. It declined in 2008 and early 2009 as panicked investors rushed into cash in an attempt to weather the financial crisis. But sometime in the middle on 2009, when investors began to move their money from the sidelines, gold started to rally. It returned 32.59% through the third quarter of 2009, vs. 19.26% for stocks.

The question is, where can we expect gold to go from here? In order to predict whether gold prices will skyrocket or come crashing down, it’s important to understand the principal factors that affect the price of any commodity: supply and demand.

The supply side of the equation is not particularly relevant in regard to gold because gold supplies remain fairly constant. That’s because production has not significantly increased due to a lack of new mining sites. Should supplies increase, however, investors may want to be cautious.

The demand side of the equation, then, is the one gold investors must look at. And as we noted above, demand for gold tends to increase when investors have a lack of confidence in the U.S. economy and financial markets.

That’s certainly the case today. In fact, we see two factors, that could lead gold to outperform in the near future: inflation and currency devaluation. In response to the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009, the Federal Reserve injected massive amounts of liquidity into the money markets. Ultimately, that increase in the money supply could devalue the U.S. dollar and lead to inflation. In fact, the U.S. dollar is already shockingly low. On October 14, 2009, it fell to a 14-month low against the euro, hitting $1.4947, the weakest since August 2008, according to Bloomberg. And while inflation is not yet a problem, economists are on the lookout for it.

These conditions led Standard & Poor’s (S&P) to raise its gold price assumption for 2010 from $750 per ounce to $800 per ounce. “Investors seeking a hedge against inflation risks and uncertainty in the financial markets continue to support gold prices,” the S&P analysts write. “The metal’s properties as a safe haven, and to a lesser extent the demand for jewelry, also support its longer-term price prospects.”

S&P’s estimate, however, may be on the low side. As of November 2009, gold was trading at more than $1,000 per ounce. And since gold exceeded $1,000 per ounce level, the price has been extremely resilient, with no meaningful pullback seen. There have been periods of profit-taking, but increased demand quickly appears on any weakness in price.

In sum, then, good old-fashioned gold fever is back—and investors who are looking for a promising trend may want to consider investing in it and other precious metals.

But don’t consider gold an investment only for troubled times. One of the greatest advantages of precious metals exists regardless of economic and market conditions. Precious metals tend to perform differently from other assets. As a result, investing in precious metals may be a good diversification strategy for a portfolio comprised mainly of stocks, bonds and real estate—in all environments.

This article was written by OilPrice.com – who offer free information and analysis on Energy and Commodities. The site has sections devoted to Fossil Fuels, Alternative Energy, Metals, Oil prices and Geopolitics. To find out more visit their website at: http://www.oilprice.com

With the global economy taking off without us and foreign interest rates already on the rise, the Fed is desperate to look bullish while acting bearish.

Anybody that has ever tried to prove the existence of Santa Clause or the Tooth Fairy to a six year old knows what Bernanke is trying to do. At this point, he’ll do anything to change the subject and focus the attention on something else.

With all of this talk about an increasingly deadly carry trade bubble, it is beyond obvious that American interest rates need to rise. If it doesn’t happen, soon enough all of America’s money will be invested in some high rise in China’s Guandong province… or Saudi oil.

But we all know Bernanke would commit career suicide by lifting a headliner like short-term rates even by a quarter of a percent. The blame for any upcoming financial downturn will be squarely on his shoulders.

For the youngsters in the room, he’ll be blamed for outing Santa Clause.

So what’s the guy to do? He’s already doing it.

The Fed is unraveling its plans to buy a whopping $1.25 trillion worth of mortgage-backed securities and $200 billion worth of other mortgage-related notes.

By March, the Fed’s massive buying spree will be over, once again letting the markets deal with a massive amount of very “un-transparent” securities. The same lion that brought the bull down is once again about to be un-caged, hungrier than ever.

If you thought the market had a hard time swallowing so many mortgage defaults, wait until $1.45 trillion dollars runs straight into 10% unemployment and a real estate market worth a fraction of what it was even a year ago.

And here’s the kicker, just by refraining from hitting the “buy” button, Bernanke effectively raises mortgage rates by as much as 100 basis points.

Let’s see… 10% unemployment, a weakened currency, deflating home prices and inflating borrowing costs. It’s a recipe for disaster.

At least Bernanke gets to keep his job and he gets the keen realization that he would not be in this bind if he never would have meddled with the markets in the first place.

We all knew the day would come when the Fed had to clean up its mess. That day has come.

***As if the markets have not shown enough contempt for government intervention, Uncle Sam is once again trying to throw sand into the gears and cogs of American business.

This time they want us to pay workers for not showing up to the job.

Thanks to a representative from California (there’s a surprise), legislation is working its way through Capitol Hill that would force employers to pay an employee for up to five days worth of sick leave if the worker is diagnosed with ANY infectious disease.

The rational side of my brain says there is absolutely no way this is going to make it the White House. The harm it would do to production is simply too immense to deny, even by politicians.

But the irrational side of me can already imagine the last-minute phone calls. “Sorry boss. I can’t flip burgers today. Got herpes. See you on Friday to get paid.”

Gotta love where we are headed.

Investors must be pondering the future.

What will the future look like? No one knows. But investors thought they saw things they liked.

For one thing, there was the Federal Reserve governor from New York, who told the world that there was no risk of a rate hike anytime soon. Bill Dudley knows which way the wind is blowing. He said the Fed would hold money policy loose “indefinitely.”

Indefinitely is otherwise known as “as long as it takes.”

But as long as it takes for what? Ah…as long as it takes until the economy appears strong again.

How long will that be? Ah…maybe longer than anyone realizes.

Yesterday, we were calculating how long it would take to get the jobless number back down to ’90s levels…that is, around 5%. There are now about 131 million jobs in the United States…and about 15 million people who would like a job but can’t find one. Meanwhile, population growth adds about 1.5 million new workers every year. That means the economy has to grow at 1% (in real terms) just to stay even with population growth. Currently, the economy is going in the wrong direction – backwards. It’s losing jobs…maybe 3 million this year…and maybe another 2 million or so before it finally stabilizes (who knows?)…for a total of 20 million jobs down (about 13% unemployment) by the time unemployment bottoms out.

Let’s suppose, by some miracle, the economy turns around…and begins growing at 3% per year. That should be about 3 million new jobs per year. Half of those, remember, are just to keep up with population growth. So the other half – 1.5 million – gradually reduce unemployment. Now, let’s get out the calculator…20 million divided by 1.5 million equals a little more than 13. By these numbers you can expect full employment again in 2022!

But what if the economy doesn’t grow at 3% per year? Ooooh…that’s the problem, isn’t it? All the feds – and practically all other economists too – are projecting a return to normal. They expect a ‘recovery.’ But what if there never is a recovery?

Heck, yesterday, the central bank of Australia said it was so sure that everything was going well it raised its key lending rate by 25 basis points.

“Canberra says risk of serious retraction over,” The Financial Times reports.

But they get a lot of sunshine down under. Possibly, the heads of the Reserve Bank of Australia got a little too much of it yesterday. Australia is also a supplier of natural resources to China; possibly, the sun burnt bankers failed to notice that China is a bubble.

Or maybe they failed to notice that China’s biggest customer is broke.

Right under The Financial Times’ article about Australia is the following headline:

“No sign of credit revival for US households.”

“The latest data from the Federal Reserve show consumer credit declined at an annual rate of 10.4% in July – the fastest rate since the crisis began two years ago.”

Yes, dear reader, Americans are shedding debt. They are cutting back. They are saving.

Another headline in The Financial Times tells us, “Holiday sales [are] set to fall.”

Hold on. Who makes all that junk that Americans buy for Christmas? And how can China buy more raw materials from Australia when it is selling fewer finished products to Americans?

Perhaps China is focusing more sales on the domestic market; we don’t doubt it. But you don’t refocus the world’s second or third largest economy in 12 months. It takes years. And you don’t get this kind of rebirth without some kind of suffering. The big, old oak tree has to fall down before the sapling can take its place. And when the oak falls – it makes one helluva mess.

Meanwhile, President Obama is adding more gin to the party punch. He says he’s considering ways to create more jobs without a new stimulus program. Among the schemes under consideration is a $3,000 new job tax credit.

Hey, why not! They had such great success with the Clunker tax credit…and with the first time house buyer tax credit. Of course, when you pay people to do things, you can’t be too surprised that they do them. And then, you can’t be too surprised when they stop doing them after you stop paying them. Thus, when the Clunkers program conked out in August car buyers stopped buying. And when the new house purchase tax credit expires in November, don’t be surprised if house sales collapse too. So, if the feds are going to pay people to hire other people, they better be prepared to do it for a long time.

Which brings us back to our calculations. How long will it be before this economy can walk without the feds clutching both arms? A few months ago, we wondered how long it would take consumers to put their finances back in order. Five years? Ten years? There are so many assumptions required that the numbers barely make sense. Still, if you think the total debt burden is headed back to under 200% of GDP, where it was for most of the last century, that would require the elimination of debt equal to about 160% of GDP…or more than $20 trillion worth. How do you eliminate debt? Well, some of it simply disappears…through defaults, foreclosures and bankruptcies. The rest is paid off. How? By saving. Now, imagine that the United States could put an amount equal to 15% of GDP to work paying down its debts. That’s savings and capital formation of all types – corporate as well as individual. It ignores government, which is going in the other direction. At 15% of GDP per year, paying America’s private debt down to under 2 times annual output is still about a 7-year project.

So, prepare for a long dry spell. In the best of cases, the American public has to stay on the frugality wagon for 7 to 13 years.

And in the worst of cases? Oh, well…that’s a different matter. The aforementioned US government is desperate to short-circuit the process of balance sheet repair. It is propping up the old tree every way it can. Thus, the whole period of adjustment may take much, much longer than it should. Instead of coming down with a crash, the limbs fall off one at a time. At this rate, the whole process could take nearly forever.

As the private sector eliminates debt, for example, the feds add it. The deficits are scheduled – by the Congressional Budget Office – to be monstrous, but controllable. Cash for clunkers, cash for houses, cash for jobs – it adds up. But the CBO projections are based on very optimistic assumptions, in which the economy ‘recovers’ quickly and grows strongly. They do not take into account the real nature of the slump. It is not a pause…it is a permanent change. The Obama administration cannot, ultimately, prevent change. But it can slow down the process so much that the depression begins to seem eternal.

Until tomorrow,

Bill Bonner

Source: The Eternal Depression