Baltimore — (TFN): Well, look at that. There are consequences for our actions. Even in this day and age when it is virtually illegal to step on your neighbor’s toes or wish the corner beggar a Merry Christmas, we are still held responsible for our wrongdoings.

Just ask Balloon Boy’s old man. The trickster just got sentenced to ninety days in jail, with two thirds of the time allocated to a work release program. But even better than his time defending himself from shivs and bathroom sneak attacks is the four-year time span in which it is illegal for him to profit from his eye-popping stunt.

So long book deal. In four years, it will be Balloon Boy? Who?

I wish there was similar legislation for the folks in Washington, some sort of law that banned rule makers and regulators from profiting from their own outrageous stunts.

Chances are folks like Pelosi, Reid, Geithner and Bernanke would be out of a job.

After last week’s close-call confirmation vote in the Senate, many pundits are saying Bernanke should be out of a job regardless of the law.

I have a feeling the position is shared by Oliver Garrett, the CEO of Casey Research.

Read what he just sent me and you be the judge:

Ben Bernanke is a dubious choice to be named “Person of the Year” by Time magazine.  While Time’s Managing Editor Richard Stengel credits him with recognizing early and reacting appropriately to the ongoing financial crisis, in reality, he was wrong time and again with both his predictions and his remedies.

Just remember these gems:

•    On July 1, 2005, Bernanke stated without hesitation that we were not experiencing a housing bubble: “I think what is more likely is that house prices will slow, maybe stabilize, might slow consumption spending a bit.”

•    November 2005, on derivatives: “With respect to their safety, derivatives, for the most part, are traded among very sophisticated financial institutions and individuals who have considerable incentive to understand them and to use them properly.” And “the Federal Reserve’s responsibility is to make sure that the institutions it regulates have good systems and good procedures for ensuring that their derivatives portfolios are well managed and do not create excessive risk in their institutions.”

•    February 15, 2006: “Housing markets are cooling a bit. Our expectation is that the decline in activity or the slowing in activity will be moderate, that house prices will probably continue to rise.”

•    February 2008: “I expect there will be some failures of smaller banks” (Bear Stearns collapsed a couple of weeks later).

•    But then again, I guess in regards to his nomination we are talking about achievements in 2009. That was the year Bernanke said, “Currently, we don’t think [the unemployment rate] will get to 10 percent.”

This is the same chairman of the Federal Reserve who told us that Fannie and Freddie were “adequately capitalized” and “in no danger of failing.”

Unfortunately, he has not just been wrong about housing, unemployment, banking, and derivatives — his policies have directly contributed to all of the problems we now face.

High unemployment and the weak dollar threaten to further undermine our economy, yet his policy is to just keep borrowing.

The massive debt his policies have foisted on the American taxpayer is weakening the U.S.’s position as global economic leader and hurting already tenuous relations with foreign governments.

Bernanke has supported the policies of Greenspan and our current and previous administrations – the very policies that got us into this mess.  He has supported the leveraging of the American economy to rescue companies long past saving and the borrowing of billions from foreign governments to line the pockets of corrupt investment bankers.

I could recommend a few alternative names for runner-up, if Time’s criteria are really as dubious as they appear:

•    Lloyd Blankfein from Goldman Sachs for robbing taxpayers legally

•    Rick Wagoner of GM for taking the world’s largest car maker to bankruptcy in a quarter-century

•    Tim Geithner for ensuring that all of our bankers prospered during the worst financial crisis since the ‘30s

•    Tiger Woods for providing the nation with great dinner conversations and helping to spur tabloid sales.

Bernanke is insistent on using inflation to make our personal debts seem small, all the while setting the country up for a much larger disaster long term. Bernanke is borrowing from Peter to pay Paul… and robbing taxpayers to pay Peter.

As you may have noticed, the government will not save you from the reverberations of a declining U.S. economy. You’ll have to take matters into your own hands… and no one is better at pointing the way than the editors of The Casey Report.

No matter how dire the economic trend, double- or triple-digit gains within 12 to 24 months are easy if you discover the right opportunities to profit. Find out more by clicking here.

*** That’s it for this week. The TFN offices are closed tomorrow and Friday for the holidays and I’ll be spending the days with friends and family.

Even if you are not a fan of Christmas and all it stands for, my wish for you is to at least share in some of the pleasantries and delights of the season. There are far too many folks that won’t be able to this year.

Olivier Garrett (Casey Research):

Ben Bernanke is a dubious choice to be named “Person of the Year” by Time magazine.  While Time’s Managing Editor Richard Stengel credits him with recognizing early and reacting appropriately to the ongoing financial crisis, in reality, he was wrong time and again with both his predictions and his remedies. Just remember these gems:

• On July 1, 2005, Bernanke stated without hesitation that we were not experiencing a housing bubble: “I think what is more likely is that house prices will slow, maybe stabilize, might slow consumption spending a bit.”
• November 2005, on derivatives: “With respect to their safety, derivatives, for the most part, are traded among very sophisticated financial institutions and individuals who have considerable incentive to understand them and to use them properly.” And “the Federal Reserve’s responsibility is to make sure that the institutions it regulates have good systems and good procedures for ensuring that their derivatives portfolios are well managed and do not create excessive risk in their institutions.”
• February 15, 2006: “Housing markets are cooling a bit. Our expectation is that the decline in activity or the slowing in activity will be moderate, that house prices will probably continue to rise.”
• February 2008: “I expect there will be some failures of smaller banks” (Bear Stearns collapsed a couple of weeks later).
• But then again, I guess in regards to his nomination we are talking about achievements in 2009. That was the year Bernanke said, “Currently, we don’t think [the unemployment rate] will get to 10 percent.”

This is the same chairman of the Federal Reserve who told us that Fannie and Freddie were “adequately capitalized” and “in no danger of failing.”  

Unfortunately, he has not just been wrong about housing, unemployment, banking, and derivatives — his policies have directly contributed to all of the problems we now face.

High unemployment and the weak dollar threaten to further undermine our economy, yet his policy is to just keep borrowing. The massive debt his policies have foisted on the American taxpayer is weakening the U.S.’s position as global economic leader and hurting already tenuous relations with foreign governments. Bernanke has supported the policies of Greenspan and our current and previous administrations – the very policies that got us into this mess.  He has supported the leveraging of the American economy to rescue companies long past saving and the  borrowing of billions from foreign governments to line the pockets of corrupt investment bankers. 

I could recommend a few alternative names for runner-up, if Time’s criteria are really as dubious as they appear:

• Lloyd Blankfein from Goldman Sachs for robbing taxpayers legally
• Rick Wagoner of GM for taking the world’s largest car maker to bankruptcy in a quarter-century
• Tim Geithner for ensuring that all of our bankers prospered during the worst financial crisis since the ‘30s
• Tiger Woods for providing the nation with great dinner conversations and helping to spur tabloid sales.

Bernanke is insistent on using inflation to make our personal debts seem small, all the while setting the country up for a much larger disaster long term. Bernanke is borrowing from Peter to pay Paul… and robbing taxpayers to pay Peter. 

As you may have noticed, the government will not save you from the reverberations of a declining U.S. economy. You’ll have to take matters into your own hands… and no one is better at pointing the way than the editors of The Casey Report. No matter how dire the economic trend, double- or triple-digit gains within 12 to 24 months are easy if you discover the right opportunities to profit. Find out more by clicking here.

Geithner just reaffirmed this, though not in so many words, in an interview with Charlie Rose.

Asked about the possibility of letting a major bank fail, he said, “I’ll say again, they play a critical role in our markets, in our financial system. We want to continue to make sure they play that role. Now, where they need temporary assistance through the government to get through that, we’re going to make sure it comes with appropriately tough conditions so that they emerge stronger and that we’re providing a level of conditions and accountability that’s appropriate in this context.”

Translation:  They can continue screwing up indefinitely, and we’ll still come to their rescue.

The “stress tests”?  That’s just a sham to make it look as if the banks are being held to some sort of standard.

Working from the same playbook, Fed chief Ben Bernanke said yesterday, “We have reiterated the U.S. government’s determination to ensure that systemically important financial institutions continue to be able to meet their commitments.”  And if it that means the Fed has to buy up Treasuries (and print money for that purpose), so be it.

Consider yourself warned.

Consider also that the Zombie Policy isn’t even achieving its stated aims.  Weren’t we promised that if the Fed and Treasury kept pumping money into these banks, the banks would lend more freely, and businesses could borrow more easily, and so businesses could create more jobs?

Well, not so much.  “Banks that have received billions of federal dollars to encourage them to make loans — JPMorgan Chase & Co., Goldman Sachs Group, Citigroup Inc. and Bank of America Corp. — are lending money to Pfizer and Merck” so they can buy out Big Pharma competitors, according to the Los Angeles Times.  The mergers could result in 35,000 jobs lost.

Source:  Zombie Policy Reaffirmed