Take the Consumer Price Index, a widely used measure of inflation. It tracks inflation in part by comparing a basket of commonly consumed goods over the years.

Governments don’t like inflation. So they simply pull a fast one on Joe Public and swap the goods in the basket as it suits them. This from TradeSystemGuru.com’s Matt Blackman:

In an effort to keep inflation down and accentuate growth, statisticians shamelessly distort and manipulate the data. For example, the Consumer Price Index measures inflation in part by comparing a basket of goods over the years. But what is not publicly understood is that each year, that basket changes. […]Here is just one example of how one of these tools, namely substitution, works. If the price of salmon goes up too much, the Bureau of Labor Statistics substitutes it for a cheaper food item like say hot dogs. The result is that from 2007 to 2008, CPI showed a 4.1% rise in the price of food. But according to the Farm Bureau, that tracks the same basket (without using substitution, weighting or hedonics), food prices actually rose 11.3%!

Employment figures are also fudged. As James Dale Davidson points out in the upcoming issue of Crisis Strategy Alert:

The official unemployment statistic picked up in today’s headlines, the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ U-3 measure, does not count everyone who is unemployed and underemployed.But that’s not the only problem with the numbers.

The government also inserts an official fudge factor – which in May amounted to 220,000 fictitious jobs. These so-called “birth/death” statistical adjustments arbitrarily add fluctuating numbers of jobs to the total measured employment. This supposedly accounts for jobs supposedly being created by new businesses that are supposedly too small and young for the government to detect. U-3 is also flawed in that it doesn’t count people ineligible for unemployment benefits. […]

To get a real picture of the current unemployment levels you need to focus on the grossly underreported U-6 data set known as “alternative measures of labor utilization.” The U-6 data set includes everyone counted in U-3, plus “all marginally attached workers” and people who aren’t working full-time but wish they were (i.e., the underemployed). (Marginally employed covers “persons who currently are neither working nor looking for work but indicate that they want and are available for a job and have looked for work sometime in the recent past.”)

When you add up U-3 and all the underutilized workers, the official U-6 rate for May 2009 is 16.4%. In other words, the employment picture is twice as bad 14 months after the recent peak as it was in December 1930, 18 months after the peak prior to the Great Depression.

As James says, “If you take care to analyze the data, it’s easy to see that there are not many green shoots growing. In fact, when you put aside the hype and look more carefully, indicators such as employment, industrial production, stock prices and international trade are all tracking their trajectories from the Great Depression… or worse.”

Taking care to analyze the data can clearly mean the difference between a good investment decision and a bad one… the difference between a stock market victim and a successful investor… the difference between a comfortable retirement and a last-minute scramble to cover a pension shortfall.

If you’re interested in discovering the truth behind the government’s lies about the economy and protecting your wealth during the current crisis, you can take a 60-day risk-free test drive of James’s research service.

You will get immediate access to past issues, weekly updates on how to profit in the downturn and the full Crisis Strategy Alert portfolio. If you decide within the first two months of the test drive that James’s investment research and crisis recommendations are not for you, it won’t cost you a dime… guaranteed. Frankly, this is a no-lose offer. Take it or leave it. It’s entirely up to you.

One thing the feds can’t fudge is the amount of tax receipts they take in. As Barron’s recently put it, “nobody pays taxes on phony, phantom jobs or earnings.”

According to Trim Tabs, the decrease in income-tax withholdings since May “indicates wage declines and job losses have accelerated.” This from Barron’s:

[I]ncome-tax withholdings in the past four weeks are down 6.1% from a year ago; in the last two weeks, they’re down an even bigger 8.1% from last year. That marks a sharp deterioration from May, when income-tax withholdings were off “only” 4.8% from a year ago. […]Meanwhile, “other” taxes were down 39.5% year-on-year, down from 33.6% in May. Corporate income taxes were down 35% from a year ago in the latest four weeks after having been down 12.3% year-on-year in May. […]

Not only do plunging tax revenues tighten the fiscal vise on the federal, state and municipal coffers, they provide unambiguous confirmation of the truly dire straits of the economy.

These numbers, of course, are at odds with the surge in the stock market, which had lifted the averages by about a third from those March lows. Now, however, equities appear to be rolling over, which could be nothing more than profit-taking to nail down wins ahead of the end of the second quarter.

But the advance also seems to be losing steam in bourses abroad as well as in commodities, which suggests much of the surge was liquidity-driven, not unlike last summer’s spike in crude oil prices to $147 a barrel. We’ll see.

“How to earn 367% off American Retail’s “Seven-Ten Split.”

“Biggest jump in wholesale food prices in more than a year!”

– Associated Press, commenting on the Labor Department’s latest wholesale prices report

I know that Justice and I have gone on for some length now on the recent rise in agricultural prices. And I now am about to delve into that same topic – again.

By now, you are probably wondering if you have accidentally subscribed to the Farm Report. But hey – it beats another column on car companies, eh?

(Oh wait, here’s an item on cars after all. I was just perusing Chrysler’s list of doomed dealerships. No wonder they are going under: In my area, there are some 25 or 30 outfits on the list that are all within an hour’s drive of each other. Many are mere miles apart, and a few could probably throw rocks at each other on slow days. With that sort of insane saturation, sooner or later, something was bound to bust!)

And Now, Back to the Farm Report…

I have two reports on my desk right now with almost completely contradictory messages. I am talking a real “seven-ten split” here (a technical term I filched from the local bowling league).

The first lauds the fact that there was almost no drop in consumer prices in April. The Labor Department thinks that this is just peachy because it means that we are not locked in a hideous deflationary spiral.

Apparently this has been a real fear in some quarters of Washington, as over the past 12 months, consumer prices have fallen a whopping 0.7%, the largest such drop since late 1956-early 1957.

Be Careful What You Wish For

The same report also brags that there was not but so much inflation to be found either. Core prices (which exclude most everything you use on a daily basis, particularly food and gasoline) actually did rise 0.3% in April. And while this was the biggest such spike since last July, the bean counters reassure us that 40% of that rise resulted from a huge spike in the Fed’s tax on tobacco.

So far as Washington is concerned, “it’s the best of all possible worlds.”

You know, those guys in Washington really ought to re-read Voltaire’s Candide before putting out such jolly statements. By the end, the kind professor who coins that Pollyannic phrase suffers through bankruptcy, the Spanish Inquisition, the Lisbon earthquake, and syphilis.

The Dangerous Gap

Because the other report on my desk has the latest wholesale figures, and they are a tad disturbing for all sorts of reasons.

In April, we saw a 0.3% increase in overall wholesale costs. This gain was roughly three times higher than expected. Annualize this and you get a wholesale inflation rate of 3.6%. That’s more than enough to completely neutralize the 3.7% drop we’ve seen over the past 12 months.

What’s more, the actual extent of this rise has been disguised by certain internal disparities. Over that same stretch, wholesale crude oil fell 0.1%. (You could be forgiven for somehow missing this, as the refined gasoline sold to retailers actually went up 2.7%.)

The New Luxury Food: Eggs

It’s that old “non-core devil,” food, that is really soaring. Overall it went up 1.5% in April. If you annualize that, you get an 18% rate of climb. But wait – eggs alone went up some 44%. And that’s not annualized. That’s just the jump for April, making for the largest such increase in the past 17 years.

Oh, and just to dot the “I,” as it were, pharmaceuticals went up at an annualized rate of 12.6%, just as swine flu began sweeping through the nation. (What lovely people in that biz. Ah well, this is, after all a capitalist nation, and they certainly have the right to charge what the market will bear.)

The Worst of All Possible Choices

Going forward, those businesses must do one of three things. They must either lower costs further (not gonna happen), raise their prices (not gonna happen), or admit that they lost their shirts come the next round of quarterly reports (and unless something changes, that is sooo gonna happen).

A few companies that you particularly ought to keep an eye on: Sears (SHLD:NASDAQ) is particularly vulnerable to increases in cotton, wool and synthetic fabric costs, and also Safeway (SWY:NYSE), which will have to start posting “apologies” signs on the egg bins again.

You would be in good company in these positions. The former is already being played short in WaveStrength Options Weekly to the tune of 37% gains as I sit to write, with gains over 118% anticipated in the near future and a final target of 367% lurking just out over the horizon. The latter, I believe is being shorted by my cellmate, Chris DeHaemer.

Source: Costs Up, Sales Down – A Formula for Retail Disaster

The Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 26.2 points, or 0.32% as of 11:00 a.m. today (Thursday), while the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index was up 4.58 points, or 0.52%.

The surge was prompted by an increase in U.S. wholesale prices, which allayed concern over deflation. Producer prices rose 0.3% in April after falling 1.2% in March. Food prices posted the biggest gain, soaring 1.5% – enough to offset a 0.1% fall in energy prices. Excluding food and fuel prices, so-called core-prices climbed 0.1%.

The rise in producer prices accompanied an increase in import prices, which climbed 1.6% in April, the government said yesterday. Producer prices and the cost of imports comprise two of the three major gauges of inflation. The third measure of inflation, consumer prices, is scheduled for release tomorrow.

The rise in U.S. equities was further supported by a solid earnings report from Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the world’s largest retailer. Wal-Mart posted a profit of $3 billion, or 77 cents a share, in the quarter ended April 30, up from 76 cents a year earlier, matching analysts’ forecasts, according to Thomson Reuters.

Net sales for the quarter fell 0.6% to $93.4 billion, but the company blamed that decline on the negative impact of a stronger dollar, which dented international sales. Wal-Mart’s international operating income fell 16.2% to $880 million on an 11.1% drop in sales to $21.3 billion.

However, international operating income at constant exchange rates was $1.13 billion in the three months ended April 30 on sales of $26.1 billion.

“In almost every country we grew the top line faster than the market despite the strong dollar and a recession that is even deeper in some countries than it is in the United States,” said chief executive Mike Duke.

Wal-Mart’s resilience offered a modicum of comfort to the retail sector after a report yesterday showed retail sales fell 0.4% in April, the eighth monthly decline in the last 10 months. Retail sales tumbled 1.3% in March.

Retail sales have been badly battered by a sharp rise in unemployment. And data from the Labor Department today furthered illustrated the frailty of the current labor market.

Initial claims for unemployment rose by 32,000 to 637,000 in the week ended May 9, from a revised 605,000 the week prior, the Labor Department said.

The economy has shed about 5.7 million jobs since the recession began in December 2007. Payrolls fell by 539,000 in April, as the jobless rate climbed to 8.9% – its highest level since 1983.

Source: Producer Prices and Wal-Mart Results Give the Market Edge Over Weak Jobs Data

Total retail sales for March clocked in at $344.4 billion, a decrease of 1.1% from February and a 9.4% dive from March 2008. Overall, first quarter retail sales sank 8.8% compared to the same period a year ago, the U.S. Commerce Department said in a report.

The stats reverse the back-to-back monthly gains that kicked off 2009. Those gains surprised the market not only because they followed dismal holiday shopping numbers in November and December, but also because unemployment continued to get worse.

“The surprisingly sharp drop in retail spending shows how uncertain consumers are about the recovery,” Joel Naroff, president of Naroff Economic Advisers, wrote in a note to clients. “Consumer spending had been growing much more strongly in the first quarter than any of us could have expected, so a one-month cutback should not have been a surprise.”

Among the hardest hit sectors, gasoline station sales were down 34.1% from March 2008, and motor vehicle and parts dealers’ sales were down 23.5% from last year. Food and beverage stores held strong with only a 0.1% decline. Healthcare spending posted the best figures with a 2.2% annual gain.

“This was not a pretty report as demand for just about everything fell,” Naroff said. “There were large reductions in demand for furniture, electronics and appliances, building materials, sporting goods and clothing.”

Sinking demand for energy products played a large hand in keeping producer prices in check. The U.S. Department of Labor said that the Producer Price Index (PPI) for finished goods, a measure of inflation, fell 1.2% in March after inching forward 0.1% in February.

Prices for energy products fell 5.5% after rising 1.3% in February. Food prices fell 0.7% after falling 1.6% the month prior. Excluding food and energy, the PPI was a flat for the month.

While not a positive, flat inflation isn’t much of a threat when compared to the host of other economic issues the Obama Administration is addressing. In fact, the U.S. Federal Reserve said it expected inflation to be “subdued” in a March 18 statement.

But inflationary concerns will be on the horizon, when government measures to reboot the economy kick in – flooding the market with liquidity that can’t be absorbed by record low interest rates.

Source: Retail Sales and Inflation Slip in March

• Live Nation Inc. (LYV), the world’s largest concert promoter, said it is buying Ticketmaster Entertainment Inc. (TKTM), the world’s largest ticketing company, for $2.5 billion including debt, Reuters reported. The merger will create a music powerhouse, already unpopular with fans and likely to receive intense scrutiny from government antitrust investigators.

• China inflation continued slowing in January, rising 1%, the slowest pace in nearly seven years. “Inflation could have been close to zero or worse if not for the Chinese New Year, because vegetable prices and grain prices went up,” Wang Tao, China economist at UBS AG in Beijing, told Bloomberg.

• MillerCoors, the U.S.-targeting joint venture between Molson Coors Brewing Co. (TAP) and SABMiller plc (ADR:SBMRY), said fourth-quarter profit slid 40%. The fall is mainly due to the costs to integrate the brands and impairment charges to its Sparks brand, the Associated Press reported.

• Switzerland’s largest bank, UBS AG (UBS), said it plans to cut another 2,000 jobs, this time at its security unit. Chief Executive Officer Marcel Rohner said the bank will return to profit in 2009, aided by help from the Swiss government to split off toxic assets, Bloomberg reported.

• Prices of call options to buy gold have almost doubled since Jan 15, as financial turmoil boosts demand for the precious metal, Bloomberg reported. Options contracts that allow holders to buy 100 ounces of gold for $1,000 each by April  traded as high as $17.50 yesterday on the New York Mercantile Exchange, as compared with $7.70 on Jan. 15. In that same period, options contracts that allow traders to sell gold at $800 by April plunged 82 percent.
• Oil prices fell below $39 a barrel on Tuesday after the U.S. Energy Information Administration revised downward its 2009 global oil demand forecast by 400,000 barrels per day predicting demand will fall by 1.17 million bpd from 2008, Reuters reported. The agency said it revised its demand forecasts on concerns the U.S. stimulus plan unveiled by the Obama administration will not stem the recession.  U.S. crude fell 63 cents to $38.93 a barrel. London Brent traded down 1 cent to $46.01 a barrel.
• Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT) is cutting 700 to 800 jobs at its home office in Arkansas, as the world’s largest retailer looks to realign its corporate structure and reduce costs, Reuters reported. The discount retailer, which has roughly 14,000 employees at its headquarters, is eliminating jobs in merchandising, real estate and marketing in its Wal-Mart U.S. division, while cutting merchandising positions at its Sam’s Club division.
• Cisco Systems Inc. (CSCO) the giant network equipment maker, launched a surprisingly large $4 billion debt sale on Monday, raising speculation that was poised to make an acquisition, Reuters reported.  The offering came on the same day Cisco said it would offer senior notes to help pay back $500 million of debt due this month. The company said it would also use the proceeds of the offering to bolster its domestic cash position of $3 billion to $4 billion.

Source: Global Investment News Briefs Wednesday, February 11th, 2009

This from Investment U:

What do a Wall Street analyst and a corn farmer have in common?  They both know that fertilizer prices have fallen off of a cliff.

Last year, a big increase in the demand for nitrogen-based fertilizers led the price of fertilizer and the value of the companies that make it, to triple-digit gains.

But when the commodities market cooled, fertilizers were no exception. Since then, the prices of fertilizer – and the companies that produce them – have dropped straight back to Earth.

Take a look…

That’s why CF Industries’ (NYSE:CF) recent announcement made such big news. Amid collapsing share prices and notoriously tight credit for mergers and acquisitions, CF Industries announced Friday an offer to buy out smaller-player Terra Industries (NYSE: TRA).

Terra Industries popped 27% on the news, and CF Industries rose 2.73%.  Normally, a buyer taking on a pile of debt to finance a deal that may or may not work out will see a little bit of a decline.

But two things are at play here:

1) The market thinks this is a good fit.

CF Industries expects to save $100 million over two years by combining forces. That’s nothing to sneeze at for a company that would have combined revenues just over $6 billion. This puts CF in position to maintain a much more competitive position over bigger players like Potash Corp. (NYSE: POT) and Terra Nitrogen (NYSE: TNH).

2) The future for fertilizer will be like the past.

Unfortunately, food production is going to be a major global problem for the next few decades. It will quite possibly be the biggest problem our species will ever face. And one of the only ways currently available to increase production is to load up on powerful nitrogen fertilizers. And since supply is finite, long-term prices have only one way to go.

Fortunately for CF Industries and other fertilizer companies, this spells profits. And for CF, the purchase of Terra Industries has likely improved their position to compete in that niche.

Source:  Stock of the Day: CF Industries (NYSE: CF)

Of all food categories, prices for cereal and baked goods hit U.S. consumers the hardest, zooming 11.7% in 2008 over 2007. Prices for meats, poultry, fish and eggs gained 5.1%. Fruits and vegetable rose 3.4%, while dairy products advanced 2.7%.

It was the second straight year U.S. consumers were forced to pay a lot more for their groceries. In 2007, food prices at supermarkets rose 5.6%. Prices rose only 1.4% in 2006.

Consumers had to pay the price last year because food makers battled the largest spike in commodities they’ve ever faced, walloped by duel increases in key food ingredients and fuel, which all marched to historic highs in July, a month in which crude oil peaked at an all-time record of more than $147 a barrel.

This major escalation in food prices calls to question contentions that inflation is not a problem, a stance that – on the surface – appears to be supported by government statistics that appear to be fairly benign.

“The notion that U.S. government inflation statistics are accurate has been the subject of intense debate for years,” said Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald. “My own belief, based on nothing more than what I feel in my wallet, is that those statistics are more cooked than a Christmas goose. I hear the same thing from tens of thousands of investors that I talk to around the world each year.”

The Lowdown on Inflation

For instance, inflation averaged 3.85% last year, according to InflationData.com, which offers investors statistics that are said to be more-specific versions of government figures. But just like stock prices, the inflation figures were whipsawed from one month to the next. The monthly U.S. inflation rate actually eclipsed the 5.0% mark in June, July and August, and was still above 4.9% in September. By December, however, the inflation rate for the month was a nearly imperceptible 0.09% – the lowest rate for any month in this decade.

The “official” consumer price index (CPI) – the measure of price changes that directly impact U.S. consumers – also seems to indicate that we’re right now in a fairly benign environment for prices.

On Friday, the Labor Department said that consumer prices dropped 0.7% in December, slightly smaller than the 0.9% drop economists expected, Yahoo! News and The Associated Press reported. For the year, consumer prices as measured by the consumer price index edged up by just 0.1%, down from the increase of 4.1% reported for all of 2007 and the smallest annual change since consumer prices actually fell by 0.7% in 1954.

The Labor Department said that the big yearly improvement occurred because of the sizable declines in energy prices that we’ve seen in recent months.

The so-called “core” CPI for December – which excludes volatile food and energy prices – was unchanged in December. For the year, the core CPI rose a moderate 1.8%, down from the modest 2.4% increase for all of 2007. Price pressures have eased as the recession intensified, The AP said.

Even back in July – the month in which crude oil prices reached their all-time peak – the overall CPI was only up a reported 2.1%.

The U.S. government actually has an incentive to understate inflation rates, since scores of payments – ranging from Social Security payments to retirees, to the interest payments on inflation-pegged Treasury bonds – are pegged to inflation calculations.

“The U.S. government is suffering from attention-to-deficits disorder,” Money Morning’s Fitz-Gerald says. “Scores of financial calculations are based on the inflation rate, and the additional increases could boost the deficit by trillions of dollars.”

The government contends that the decline in inflation is due to the economic slowdown. Further evidence of that slowdown came Friday in a separate report from the U.S. Federal Reserve that showed that production at the nation’s factories, mines and utilities plunged 2.0% percent in December, capping the worst year for manufacturers since 2001. Last month’s drop, double the amount analysts expected, came after a 1.3% in November, which was even sharper than initially reported.

For all of last year, industrial production declined 1.8%, a major reversal from the 1.7% increase reported last year. It marked the worst showing since a 3.4% decline in 2001, when the country last suffered through a recession.

The theory here is that a drop in industrial output means there’s an accompanying drop-off in demand for commodities used to make the products, meaning there’s no need for price increases.

But, as we’ll see, that’s not the case.

Food Prices Still Escalating

For December, gasoline prices fell by 17.2%, the biggest monthly decline on records that reach back 71 years. Overall energy prices also dropped by a record 8.3% as home heating oil and natural gas showed declines.

For 2008, energy prices fell 21.3%, with gas costs tumbling by 43.1%.

The story was different for food, however. While food costs were unchanged in December, they rose 5.8% for all of last year – including the 6.6% increase at the grocery store.

Some experts say these CPI figures drastically understate the real situation with regards to consumer prices. ShadowStats.com, for instance, has posted a chart on its Web site that shows an “alternate” CPI that peaked at better than 13% last year, and that ended 2008 at nearly 8% – far above the “official” government statistics.

The problems emanating from the big increase in food and commodities prices weren’t limited to the United States, either. In April, the leader of the United Nation’s World Food Programme warned that a “silent tsunami” of hunger was sweeping the globe because of soaring food prices, a situation that threatened the well-being of an estimated 20 million children in the world’s most poverty-stricken areas. At that time, food prices had risen 83% in the previous three years, and rice – a staple of daily diets throughout Asia – had actually doubled in price in the prior five weeks.

Here in the United States, however, the reported 6.6% jump in food prices – and the increase in the producer prices that necessitated the increase in the price of the products at retail – had widespread implications.

For instance, Pilgrim’s Pride Corp. (OTC: PGPDQ), the No. 1 U.S. chicken producer, declared bankruptcy on Dec. 1, according to MarketWatch.com.

Analysts claim that relief is on the way – for producers and consumers alike. Commodity prices – particularly prices for corn, wheat and energy – have plummeted since peaking last summer. And inflation at the grocery store level has eased since prices reached their peak in September, the Labor Department says.

But real-world developments continue to contradict the predictions of research economists and the “official” government reports.

Price Hikes Play Out in the Marketplace

Just consider Kellogg Co. (K), the No. 1 U.S. cereal maker, and the producer of the Frosted Flakes and Rice Krispies brand cereals, as well as the popular Pop-Tarts breakfast pastries. Kellogg was to increase prices on all three plans to lift prices in the “low-to-mid single digit” range this week to help offset the increase in commodity costs. It won’t increase prices for its All-Bran and Special K brands, however.

Kellogg said it was raising prices because it sets pricing behind increases or decreases in the value of the commodities it uses. A spokeswoman said a 2008 price hike didn’t help the company recover all its manufacturing costs.

And that may not be the end. UBS AG (UBS) analyst David Palmer said in a research note that the price increases by Kellogg’s will likely be matched by rivaling companies – the ones that make branded products, as well as manufacturers that make so-called “private-brand” or “private label” cereals.

On Friday, Palmer upgraded Kellogg’s shares to a “Buy” from a “Hold,” noting the company’s price pricing actions and moderate input costs put the company in a good position to aggresively promote its products in 2009, The Wall Street Journal reported.

(Many analysts say that reasonably valued stocks can be sound buys during inflationary periods for this very reason – they can pass any increases in input costs along to consumers in the form of higher retail prices).

General Mills Inc. (GIS), Kellogg’s top cereal rival, would not say whether it will follow Kellogg’s lead, telling MarketWatch that it doesn’t comment on pricing decisions it may or may not take.

Ralcorp Holdings Inc. (RAH), marketer of the Honey Bunches of Oats and Raisin Bran cereal brands, increased prices last year.

Grocery-store operators often try and push back on price increases, something that discount retailer Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT) is known for in the hardline goods world.

Supervalu Inc. (SVU) and the A&P Supermarkets (The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. Inc.) (GAP) have said they plan to negotiate lower prices with food suppliers, while Weis Markets Inc. (WMK) has instituted a price freeze through April 1 on 2,400 items it sells in 155 stores in Pennsylvania, Maryland, New Jersey, New York and West Virginia.

The mere fact that pricing is an issue with these supermarket chains underscores that price increases are a very real problem in the marketplace, meaning prices aren’t in the benign holding pattern many economists would have us believe.

Is the Financial Crisis Stoking Inflation?

Although the federal government says that the U.S. recession is reducing inflationary pressures, the opposite may actually be true – and the economic slowdown may actually stoke inflationary pressures, experts say. For one thing, even though stated interest rates are low, the fact is that there’s a credit crisis under way right now. That means banks aren’t lending. As a result, companies may be forced to look elsewhere for needed financing – financing that comes at a much higher cost.

And higher costs, as we’ve seen, are inflationary.

There’s also the massive bailout and stimulus packages the government is deploying to fight the financial crisis. To create the capital needed for these programs, the government is printing money. And that massive increase in the money supply can only be inflationary, says Money Morning Contributing Editor Martin Hutchinson, an expert on the global banking system. He believes inflation rates of 7% to 10% may well be in our future.

“Once the bottom has been reached, the excess liquidity that has been created over the last few months through the various bailouts – such the Treasury Department’s $700 billion Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP), which is fueling bank takeovers, and not expansionary lending, and the follow-on $800 billion credit-market stimulus unveiled late last month – will combine with the huge federal budget deficit to spur inflation,” he said.

Source: Big Jump in Food Prices the Latest Suggestion That Inflation is Much Higher Than the Government Says

This from Rude Awakening:

Indisputably, a slowdown of sorts now unspools across the markets of the world. But you’d never know it looking at Saskatchewan. What follows is another look at the great boom taking place here and a couple of ways to participate. There are more wrinkles to explore in what is shaping up to be a robust investment idea.

To begin, let’s add a bit of color to this unique story. As far as natural resources go, Fortune has smiled broadly on this land between the 49th and 60th parallels. It is the world’s largest producer of uranium and potash. The former is a critical component in the “nuclear renaissance.” The latter is a key fertilizer that sells for $1,000 per ton, compared with only $300 per ton a year ago. Saskatchewan is the world’s largest exporter of chick peas and lentils. And it is also rich in oil and gas. The U.S., in fact, buys more oil from its northern neighbor than it does from Kuwait.

The riches so far earned stagger the mind. At a time when governments everywhere face gaping budget shortfalls, Saskatchewan is awash in cash. On a budget of only $9.4 billion, the province reports a surplus of $3.1 billion. Of this, some will go toward highway repairs, better hospitals and improved schools. Not needing so much money, the government announced its largest cut in personal income taxes in its history.

It also paid off 40% of its provincial debt. Prudently, the government also decided to sit on a $2 billion cash cushion, just in case.

Many of these notes come courtesy of Brad Farquhar, vice president of Agriculture Development Corp. Hailing from Regina, the capital of the province, Farquhar has a front-row seat. “My house has about tripled in value in the last five years,” he says by way of illustrating the relative immunity of the province to the global ills that chill other markets. No housing bust here. In fact, values are rising for nearly everything, including farmland, which is Farquhar’s metier as an investor. His firm invests in farmland through its investor-owned funds.

Farmland stands to benefit from trends that you are now well familiar with if you’ve been reading this letter for any length of time. Some of the most important points bulls will commit to memory are these:

• World wheat consumption has exceeded production in six out of the past eight years
• World wheat stocks are at a 30-year low.

Greater prosperity in China and India lead to shifting diets consisting of more protein – eggs and meat. As reported in Farquhar’s farmland prospectus, to produce 1 pound of meat requires 10 pounds of grain: “Therefore, the dietary shift from grains to meat significantly increases the demand for grains.”

By tradition, China has usually produced and exported large amounts of grain. That is no longer the case. Rapid urban expansion and “desertification” of existing arable lands, along with water shortages, have all led to lower levels of supply. The same is happening in India.

The global urge to produce more biofuel also creates competition for a smaller base of farmland acreage. More acreage devoted to corn for ethanol, for example, means less devoted to soybeans or other crops used for food for people or livestock.

Saskatchewan is in a particularly good spot to gain from these broad trends. Almost half of all the farmland in Canada is found in its golden prairies. Wheat, canola and barley represent three-quarters of the crop acres in the province.

Even the icy-cold fingers of the credit crisis seem stunted here. Canada’s big agricultural lender is backed by the state. Farmers still have access to credit to plan for a big harvest next year.

The primary attraction of Saskatchewan farmland is cheapness. On that front, Farquhar offers the following jigsaw puzzle look at farmland prices in the region. Saskatchewan is the cheapest of the lot, at $405 per acre.

Shortsighted government policy was the main villain. From 1974-2003, you had to be a resident to own farmland. (”During this period, Saskatchewan was also a net exporter of people,” Farquhar’s prospectus points out. “It was a province whose population was in decline.”) Doing away with these restrictive ownership requirements in 2003 unlocked some of the value already. Annual declines in farmland values immediately began to reverse.

Saskatchewan farmland has a lot of ground to make up, though. Only 22 years ago, farmland here was more valuable than in neighboring Manitoba. But today, Manitoba’s farmland is more than 50% higher than Saskatchewan’s, at $668 an acre. The discount is attracting ranchers and grain farmers from neighboring Alberta, as well as immigrants from abroad. The government of Saskatchewan actually has a fast-track program in place to assist immigrants looking to farm in the province.

Statistics compiled by the Canadian government show that the average farmer in Saskatchewan is 52 years old. That leads Farquhar’s team to conclude in its prospectus: “The aging farming population in Saskatchewan has created a buying opportunity that [we] believe may not return for another generation.”

The next generation is less interested in farmland. The older generation will, in many cases, have to sell to folks beyond kith and kin.

For all of these specific reasons – and for the broader global trends affecting the grain markets – I expect that gap between Saskatchewan’s farmland and that of its neighbors to close quickly. Farmland values rose 11% last year in what I think are still the early stages of a multiyear boom.

Source: Saskatchewan!

The world’s stock markets tanked, as did some of its biggest economies. In such an environment, they thought, gold should have risen. After all, gold is widely considered to be a safe-haven investment when everything else is spiraling south.

However, Money Morning Contributing Editor Martin Hutchinson – an investment banker with more than 25 years’ experience on Wall Street and a leading expert on the international financial markets – understood perfectly what other investors did not.

“Gold is not a safe haven against recession,” said Hutchinson. “It’s a safe haven against inflation.”

In the past year, commodities prices skyrocketed – across the board. That was especially true of oil, which hit a record high $147 a barrel. Corn, wheat, and soybeans all hit record highs, as well.

That price escalation tightened household and corporate budgets, and was a primary reason why the U.S. economy posted a gross-domestic product (GDP) decline of 0.3%. With that negative growth, the third quarter was the beginning of what many experts believe will be the nation’s first recession since 2001.

However, the inflation epidemic has waned significantly, as global demand for raw materials has plummeted.

Price for such staple foods as corn, soybeans and wheat have all come down from their record highs – in near-lockstep fashion.

Corn futures are down nearly 50% from their summer high of $8 per bushel. The same is true of soybeans and wheat, with each having lost roughly half their value. In fact, wheat hit a 16-month low in mid-October.

As most of us noticed, gas prices have fallen 48% from their July 17 high of $4.114 a gallon.

And not coincidentally, gold has fallen 22% in that same time frame.

However, this report examines the pending commodities rebound – a projected slow-and-steady increase in commodity prices that will reverse the breakneck plunge below fair value that commodities have experienced for much of this year.

Our objective now: To chart the expected path of gold prices in the New Year.

This report also reveals another wild card inflationary indicator that Hutchinson believes will carry gold prices to $1,500 an ounce by the end of 2009.

Two Catalysts For Gold’s Climb

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Oct. 10 Crop Production Report said acreage for a handful of staple food commodities has shrunk:

• Corn acreage fell 1.2%.
• Soybean acreage dropped 1.4%.
• Canola acreage dropped 1.9%.
• Sunflower acreage shrank 0.8%.
• And acreage of dry edible beans fell 0.7%.

That naturally translates to higher prices because it squeezes the supply of the particular commodity. And it does so at a time when demand continues to escalate from populations in China, India and Latin America. And higher prices equal inflation.

But Hutchinson – who correctly predicted this last run-up in gold prices – says there’s another catalyst that’s right now inherent in the U.S. economy that could help vault gold prices to $1,500 an ounce by the end of 2009. And it has to do with the much-ballyhooed $700 billion rescue plan.

“The government is pumping money in so many banks, and that money has to come out somewhere,” Hutchinson said.

The philosophy behind the rescue plan is elegantly simple: By providing a portion of the $700 billion to foundering U.S banks, the Treasury Department believed it could provide banks with badly needed capital, and get them to start lending money once again – jump-starting the economy in the process.

Since September 2007, U.S. Federal Reserve policymakers have cut the benchmark Federal Funds target rate nine times – from 5.25% down to the current 1.0% rate – to increase bank-to-bank lending and bank-to-consumer lending.

“The government is pumping money in so many banks, and that money has to come out somewhere,” Hutchinson said.

Right now, banks aren’t boosting lending. Instead, they are using the cash to finance buyouts of other banks. Even so, that money will “come out” into the economy in the form of higher stock prices for banks. That will make consumer/investors wealthier, and could make them more confidence in the economy. If they’re more confident, they will spend. As that happens, food prices should begin ticking upward, adding another set of thrusters to gold prices.

“Everybody thinks that because we’re having a horrible recession, we’re not to going have inflation. I think that’s probably wrong,” Hutchinson said. “I think gold has quite good hidden-store value.”

As gold prices increase, count on more investors leaving the sidelines to invest, too, causing the surge in gold prices to accelerate and steepen.

“As gold goes up, it gets more popular and investors start piling into it,” Hutchinson said.

And if gold gets anywhere near the $1,500 mark, sell. Prices that high will likely fall back or plateau as the Federal Reserve begins raising interest rates and strengthening the U.S. dollar, Hutchinson said.

Five Ways to Play Bottom-Basement Gold

Before we get too far ahead of ourselves, let’s first look at five ways to play bargain-basement gold prices.

The SPDR Gold Trust ETF (GLD) – formerly StreetTracks Gold – is a fund whose shares are intended to parallel the movement of gold prices. Since gold prices started falling along with gas prices, SPDR Gold Trust has stayed within a 0.5% margin of gold prices. This exchange-traded fund (ETF) eliminates any investor concern over storage and delivery while giving them exactly what they want – gold.

Toronto-based Barrick Gold Corp. (ABX) has 27 mines, mostly in North America and South America, and is developing or exploring 11 more. With a market cap of more than $20 billion, it has considerably more liquidity than most mining companies. Barrick is primarily a gold miner, but it also has copper and zinc mining operations. As far as investors are concerned, there are two ways to look at that: It’s not a pure play, per se, but then again, this is a company stock, not a bar of bullion. Also, having operations other than gold can help stabilize the company’s bottom line in case problems arise at a gold mine.

Denver-based Newmont Mining Corp. (NEM) is primarily a gold producer with operations in the United States, Australia, Peru, Indonesia, Canada, New Zealand and Mexico. Its reserves are hovering around 86.5 million ounces. Like Barrick, this is a mining stock play, and is subject to market swings – as well as fluctuations in gold prices. That can be a significant tailwind, especially if you believe the stock market has bottomed out or is close to doing so. Hutchinson – forever a value-oriented investor – warned that Newmont might be a little too pricey now. Investors may want to wait for the company’s stock price to settle before getting in.

Hutchinson thinks the best value for a gold mining stock can be found in Yamana Gold Inc. (AUY), another Toronto-based company that’s small now, but has rapidly expanding production. 

But for investors who just want gold – not an ETF or stock – the best avenue is an EverBank Select Metals Account: EverBank accounts has a minimum deposit that is 98% lower than its competitors, and its commission costs are up to 86% lower than other metals’ brokers and bullion banks. It offers two types of gold accounts: Unallocated (your purchased gold is pooled with that of other investors, eliminating storage and maintenance costs; the minimum deposit is $5,000), and Allocated (you directly own the gold you purchase, held in your own private account; $7,500 is the minimum deposit here).

Both types of accounts can be set up 24/7 online. But if you prefer the phone, call 866-326-6241, and be sure to give them the code 12608 when setting up an account.

We should point out that the publisher of Money Morning has a marketing relationship with EverBank, but that’s because its products are among the best in class.

Source: Five Ways to Play Gold’s Rebound to $1,500 an Ounce

[Editor's Note: With the New Year upon us, it's a good time for investors to be looking ahead. With that in mind, Money Morning will be running installments of our "Outlook 2009" economic forecasting series into the New Year.]

This from Fleet Street Invest:

Just a few months ago it seemed like the whole investment world was jumping onto the commodities bandwagon. Now it seems that they can’t jump off fast enough.

The benchmark Reuters/Jefferies Commodity Index has now fallen by 51% from its peak in July (see chart below).

But as I’ll explain in a moment, commodity prices are set for a rebound. And if you are willing to take a longer term view, this is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.

Commodity prices reflect future expectations about the global economy. Less business activity and infrastructure spending means less demand for commodities. And right now the markets are pricing in a sharp slowdown next year.

A big part of the commodities sell-off has been driven by fear. In addition, speculators and hedge funds have been forced to sell to raise cash as markets tumble.

However, the underlying supply and demand for some key commodities are little changed from when prices were at all-time highs just a few months ago.

And that means commodity prices could rebound a lot faster than markets are predicting. Let’s look at the supply and demand situation for oil.

Oil will lead the rebound

In July oil hit a record price of $147 per barrel. It has since fallen by 67%. But the International Energy Agency (IEA) forecasts that demand will grow by 0.5% next year, despite the global economic slowdown. That’s because developing economies like India and China are still growing.

In addition, the markets are currently pricing in a substantial drop in demand for oil from developed countries. But the IEA predicts that demand won’t fall that much. Again, this should support the oil price.

At the same time, the OPEC oil exporters’ cartel is getting ready to slash production to boost the price. They will meet in Oran, Algeria on December 17th. Just yesterday the cartel’s president, Chakib Khelil, warned that “the Oran meeting will decide a severe production cut to stabilise the oil market.”

And it’s not just OPEC cutting oil production. Russia’s president says his country may join OPEC in reducing output to boost prices. That is big news. Because Russia is the world’s biggest energy exporter, and this is the first time it is openly talking about coordinating oil cuts with OPEC.

With demand holding up and major oil cuts looming, the recent drop in the oil price just can’t be justified. And now the market is catching on to it.

The price of oil surged by 10% yesterday to $47.98. Our forecast is that it could easily double by the end of next year.

Buying into oil is the first way to position yourself to profit from the rebound in commodities prices.

But there is more to the coming commodities rebound then just oil…

Agricultural commodities are set to follow

A rising oil price will have a knock-on effect on many other commodities. And I expect that some of the biggest moves will be in agricultural commodities over the next twelve months.

Agricultural commodities were the last to join in the commodities rally this decade. There is a good reason for that. The surge in agricultural prices wasn’t driven by the Indians and Chinese suddenly eating a whole lot more. Prices went up because crops like maize and sugar were diverted into use as biofuels (rather than as food) – as the high oil price made biofuels more a more cost-effective substitute.

The relationship between oil and biofuels is crucial. It becomes efficient to produce ethanol from maize when oil is at $50 per barrel. For sugar it makes sense when oil is just $39. The higher above those prices oil is, the more sense it makes to produce ethanol. Now as the oil price rebounds, demand for cheaper biofuel will soar.

Increased production of these biofuel crops will also mean diversion of land and other resources away from the other food crops. That’s why it’s highly likely we’ll see a broad rebound in agricultural prices next year.

Not all commodities are going to be winners

Be aware that the commodities outlook is not universally bullish. Metals, for example, could be in for a lot more pain. But oil and agriculture definitely look set for a rebound in 2009.