I call them the “zombies,” the institutions being propped up by government bailouts. Companies like Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C), Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC), General Motors Corp., Chrysler LLC, etc. On an operating level, these walking dead are sucking the life out of the recovery.

Unlike in previous downturns, huge resources have been devoted to propping up entities that should have been taken out of the picture.

Of course, it’s easy to avoid zombies directly. No one is going to force you to take a position in GM. But if you really want to know where to look for the bargains – for companies that have the greatest potential for serious growth in real numbers and real markets – you need to look for what I call “zombie-free zones.”

Unfortunately, the United States and the United Kingdom are not “zombie-free” zones – and thus offer the worst hunting ground available right now.

If you’re looking for something solid, there are only three places to aim your portfolio. In fact, my top three picks are…

Germany, Korea, and Canada.  All have an abundance of companies you can invest in with at least a good chance of not being forced to compete with the undead.

The Problem with Zombies

You see, the problem with zombie banks and companies is that they soak up resources that should be devoted to living banks and companies, while providing unfair competition that makes their competitors unsound.

It’s difficult to see this effect at the moment, because the U.S. Federal Reserve is propping up the banking sector. It’s much clearer in the automobile sector, where the zombies GM and Chrysler make it more difficult for Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) to compete. There’s no question that the continued existence of Chrysler after its first non-bankruptcy in 1979 drastically weakened Ford in the 1980s and 1990s.

There’s the effect on wages too. The United Auto Workers (UAW) union is a huge supporter of the GM and Chrysler rescues, partly because they keep UAW members employed at above-market wage rates. One certainly can sympathize with the great many American autoworkers that have lost their jobs, but by keeping the sector over-employed, the government is driving up wages and hurting businesses – particularly Ford, the only member of Detroit’s “Big Three” to not ask for a bailout.

The same effect can be seen in the banking sector. The bonus pool at JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) is partly inflated by the continued employment of all the Citibankers who should have lost their jobs. Since banking pay scales got over-inflated during the bubble, it is reasonable now for them to come back down to earth, but that’s not going to happen while banks are in their current undead state.

Turning to the international market, it is immediately clear that Britain has the same problem as the United States, only on a larger scale. Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC (NYSE ADR: RBS) and Lloyds Banking Group PLC (NYSE: LYG), two of Britain’s largest banks have been kept open by the government. (Though, to be fair, Lloyds only got in trouble because the government made it acquire another failing bank, HBOS.)

Financial services is a huge part of Britain’s economy, which needs to diversify, but it won’t be able to diversify if so much of its talent is locked up in banking, and its best graduates are sucked into the high-paying dealing rooms of the City of London.

Japan has the same problem. Here the zombies are really ancient, cobwebbed skeletons left over from the 1990 collapse of Japan’s bubble. Some of them were put out of their misery by Junichiro Koizumi, the reformist prime minister, in 2003. Yet just this week we learned that many Japanese retailers face losses because of competition from The Daiei Inc. and Ito-Yokado Co. Ltd., gigantic retailing companies that were effectively bankrupt in 1993 but have been propped up by Japan’s banks. If you’re afraid of zombies, Japan is really creepy!

Historically, Europe is the continent where investors have suffered most from zombies propped up by governments. Certainly some countries, notably Italy, are attractive only for investment necrophiliacs.

Where to Find “Zombie-Free Zones”

There are some exceptions. Germany has only a few relatively small zombies. Both Sachsen LB and IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG, the banks that got in trouble buying U.S. subprime mortgage-backed bonds, have been sold to other buyers – Sachsen to a larger Landesbank and IKB to the private equity group Lone Star Funds. Whatever their subsequent fate, those banks are currently being managed on a profit-maximizing basis.

There is a large older zombie, Hypo Real Estate Holding AG, the former Bayerische Hypothekenbank, which got in trouble in the late 1990s lending to real estate in the former East Germany, but that appears an isolated example. Industrially, Germany has been admirably rigorous in cleaning up its dead companies, and with its new pro-market government looks attractive for zombie-fearing money.

In Asia, South Korea is probably your best bet. The country had a big zombie problem ten years ago, but that problem has been cleared up with the bankruptcy and reorganization of several conglomerates and much of the banking system. This time around, there have been few major casualties and so the economy looks relatively zombie-free.

Finally, there is our northern neighbor, Canada. Canadian housing never became as over-extended as U.S. housing, and the Canadian bank bailout was correspondingly smaller, with none of the banks facing bankruptcy. Canada had a bad zombie problem fifteen years ago from decaying heavy industry, but today those zombies are long gone and the Canadian economy is resilient. The most recent bankruptcy, Nortel Networks Corp. (OTC: NRTLQ) in Jan. 2009, is being handled in a thoroughly market-oriented fashion, with its assets being sold off piecemeal. So your money is safe in Canada – lots of snow, but no zombies!

Source: Why You Need to Look at these Three ‘Zombie-Free Zones’

China has used depressed commodities prices to stock up on long-term supplies of raw materials such as oil, copper, and iron.  And it’s used structural weakness in the U.S. financial system as justification for replacing the dollar as the world’s main reserve currency.

Now, the Red Dragon is looking to make headway on the highway by winning global market share in the automotive market while U.S. heavyweights spin out.

“We aren’t afraid of the financial crisis,” Zhou Fuquan, vice president of Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd. (PINK: GELYF), told Bloomberg News. “On the contrary, we hope it will penetrate even further as it has provided us with some opportunities.”

Geely is China’s biggest private automaker, but that isn’t exactly saying much. The company’s annual output is just 300,000 units, and its market share in China is a meager 3%. Still, Hangzhou- based Geely is determined to become a global player in the auto industry. It has ambitions to sell 2 million cars a year, including 1.3 million overseas – even though right now the company generates just 5% of its sales from abroad.

Of course, that’s why the financial crisis has been more of a financial opportunity for Geely. In March, Geely bought key assets from bankrupt Australian gearbox maker Drivetrain Systems International – the world’s second-largest maker of automatic transmissions.

“The economic downturn provides us with very good overseas acquisition opportunities,” Daniel Dai, vice president for international business at Geely, told China Daily. “We get the best technology with the best price.”

Geely has also set up a joint venture with Manganese Bronze Holdings PLC (MBH) to produce the TX4 London Taxi in Shanghai. MBH supplies taxis to Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Spain as well, boosting Geely’s global presence.

For months, analysts have speculated that Geely will continue to its overseas expansion by launching a bid for Ford Motor Co.’s (NYSE: F) Volvo unit. Ford, which is the only “Big Three” auto company to not receive government aid, last December started looking to offload the Swedish car brand in an effort to pay off the debt it accrued when the company borrowed $23.5 billion in 2006.

Geely said on Sept. 9 that it might partner with a state-owned investment company to bid for Volvo. And earlier this week, the company announced that it would raise $334 million in funds from Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS) through a convertible bond offering to “fund the capital expenditures of the group, potential acquisitions by the group and for general corporate purposes of the group.”

However, some analysts have pointed out that the Goldman capital falls well short of the roughly $2 billion Ford is asking for Volvo. They believe Geely instead will use the money to increase capacity and market the models it already has to buyers outside of its home market.

“The management is planning to expand its distribution channel to foreign countries,” Richard Li, research director at Celestial Asia Securities Holdings, told Forbes magazine. “This deal can provide this company enough funds so that the cash flow will be upgraded long term.”

And if nothing else, Goldman’s investment could be enough to instill investor confidence in the small Chinese carmaker.

Almost a year ago to the day Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE: BRK.A, BRK.B) subsidiary MidAmerican Energy Holdings Co. agreed to pay roughly $230 million for a 9.89% stake in Chinese car and battery producer BYD Co. Ltd. Since then, BYD’s shares have jumped more than fivefold in that time.

“A big name investor certainly helps boost stock prices and brand recognition,” Li Lixi, a Northeast Securities Co. analyst in Shanghai, told Bloomberg. “Goldman’s investment in Geely may repeat the impact that [Warren] Buffett had on BYD.”

Geely’s Hong Kong shares yesterday (Wednesday) surged to their highest in more than nine years on the news of Goldman’s investment.

The Race to Build a Competitive Chinese Brand

Geely isn’t the only Chinese companies looking to use the financial crisis as an opportunity to broaden its global reach either. Other Chinese companies, including Beijing Automotive Industry Holdings Co. (BAIC), SAIC Motor Corp. Ltd., and Sichuan Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery Co., are determined take the lead in what has become a race to be the first world-renowned Chinese automotive company.

“It takes decades to establish a recognized, renowned brand,” Jim Hossack, an industry analyst at researcher AutoPacific Inc., told Bloomberg. “China wants to do it much faster, perhaps within as little as five years.”

BAIC on Sept. 9 joined Koenigsegg Group in its bid for GM’s Saab division. Koenigsegg – backed by U.S. and Norwegian investors – in June agreed to buy Saab from GM, but struggled with financing the deal.

SAIC group, the parent of China’s largest automaker, had also considered coming to Koenigsegg’s aid in the Saab bid. But ultimately it was BAIC that came through with the $420 billion in financing needed to close the deal.

“This is a great opportunity for us to partner up with a brand like Saab that we believe has a great future with a new business plan and new ownership,” Wang Dazong, general manager of Beijing Auto, said in a statement posted on its Web site.

Koenigsegg and BAIC will form a joint venture to market Saab cars in China, where the brand has little-to-no presence. BAIC will also gain valuable technology from the Swedish car company.

“Chinese manufacturers are hoping to buy up technology that will help them catch up to world standards on both the product and the development side more quickly than they would on their own,” Christoph Stuermer, automotive analyst at IHS Global Insight Inc., told the Financial Times.

However, not every Chinese endeavor has been greeted with success. Shanghai-based SAIC in 2004 paid $500 million for 49% of Ssangyong Motor Co. just to watch the South Korean carmaker go into receivership in February. And Sichuan Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery’s attempted takeover of GM’s Hummer brand is still being stalled by China’s central government.

“It’s not in coordination with our nation’s industrial policy,” Vice Minister of Commerce Chen Jian said after sending back Sichuan’s application to acquire the Hummer brand for $100 million.

Still, Chinese auto companies won’t be satisfied until they race ahead of their Western counterparts.

“I’m fighting for what’s in overseas automakers’ rice bowls,” Geely founder Li Shufu told Bloomberg. “I want to build Geely into a global first-tier automaker.”

Source: Financial Crisis Gives Chinese Car Companies a Chance to Get Up to Speed

Whether the action can be accredited to the greatly debated Cash for Clunkers program or if it is merely the effect of natural economic forces, there is good news out of the auto industry these days… finally.

First, there is word from General Motors (NYSE:GRM) that it plans to expand production at three of its manufacturing facilities. For the nearly 2,400 workers that will be invited to work on the third-shift line, the news is the best they have heard in a while.

It is a similar story at cross-town rival, Ford (NYSE:F), except few American workers will be clocking in for the new shifts. The company is widely expected to announce its plans for a third major production facility in China later this week.

Ford’s news is strong evidence of Asia’s long-term growth potential, especially for American car manufacturers dealing with a weak currency back home.

A bit further down the supply chain, Dana Holding Corp. (NYSE:DAN), a major automotive industry supplier,  is adding to its spectacular six-month run today as its shares surge by nearly 30%.

The stellar gains come as the company kicks off a public offering of 27 million shares. The sale, which is likely to bring in close to $200 million, will be used to repay the company’s massive debt.

While $200 million won’t pull the company out of debt, it will help. The heavy load created by over a billion dollars in debt was one of the driving forces that took share price as low as $0.19 over the last year.

With shares of the company trading for close to $7.30 today, investors who got in at the bottom are sitting on gains of more than 3,700%. Not a bad profit for six months.

Room for more gains?

Over on the retail side of things, the situation is nearly as optimistic.

CarMax (NYSE:KMX) shareholders are smiling today as their company’s value has surged by double-digit proportions on news that the company’s second-quarter sales were better than expected.

Thanks to the crowds awakened by the Cash for Clunkers incentive program, the massive car retailer raked in a record-breaking profit of $103 million over the past three months.

Now the big question on everybody’s mind is will the profitability and growth be sustainable?

Already, there are signs the industry is beginning to slow. Some reports have new-car showrooms even emptier than before the massive incentive program. If that is the case, those recalled workers may be back in the unemployment line all too soon.

If you are a long-term investor, you can afford to keep your shares in the game. Eventually, today’s prices will look cheap.

But if you can’t stand some short-term volatility or are sitting on a hefty pile of profits, now would be a good time to pull some chips from the table.

Detroit has found safety in a calm meadow, but it is not out of the woods yet.
Source: Detroit Update: Finally Some Good News?

For a bunch of financial writers, we sure do a lot of talking. There is no debating we have a lot of interesting discussions around the TFN office. Yesterday we got into an in-depth conversation about penny stock investing.

The question: what does the perfect small cap look like?

Of course, each of us had differing opinions based on our own theories and experiences, but we came to one obvious conclusion. Give us a small cap that has the books of a Blue Chip and we will show you a winning pick.

As if it was some sort of divine intervention, our conclusion was proven to be deadly accurate this morning.

When I initially recommended SpongeTech (OTC BB:SPNG) to Hot Stock Confidential subscribers on August 13, I said, “The company’s balance sheet reads more like a blue chip than a speculative penny pick.”

It’s true. SpongeTech was highly undervalued. It was buying back its shares and is growing like the national debt.

The recommendation was only made two weeks ago, but already it has paid off. I advised readers to sell half of their positions for gains of 30% today. By locking in at today’s price, we can afford to ride out any future volatility.

Room for more

Almost instantly after sending out the sell alert, another “small-cap Blue Chip” popped up on my screen.

The headline from the Associated Press reads, “Kewaunee Scientific raises dividend to 10 cents.”

My first thought… who in the world can raise their dividend in this economy?

For any investor who has ever studied signaling theory, this is the ultimate buy signal from the company’s management. It shows that Kewaunee’s (NASDAQ:KEQU) top brass is confident growth is going to exceed shareholder expectations organically.

Investors rewarded the company by increasing its share price by as much as 8% during the session.

Of course, digging through the company’s books, it is obvious this company is a Blue Chip in a small-cap shell.

With a market value of just $33 million, many of this company’s brethren barely have revenues worth noting. Kewaunee flexed its muscle by sporting a top line of $104 million last year. Best of all, the company turned the sales into a net profit of $4.2 million.

A 4% margin is not worth shouting about, but it sure beats what Ford (NYSE:F), Boeing (NYSE:BA) or Hone Depot (NYSE:HD) did during the same period.

Now, with a market cap of $33 million and $4 million in earnings, we get a price/earnings (P/E) ratio of 8.25.

Home Depot’s ratio stands at 20. Boeing comes in at 15. And Ford, well, it may be a few years until it finds a positive figure for the ratio’s denominator.

Of course, with any small cap, liquidity is a major risk factor. With $25 million in debt, investors should certainly watch Kewaunee’s leverage. But it is nothing worth crossing this one of your buying list for.

After all, aren’t liquidity concerns an issue at almost every Blue Chip these days? The Dow was built (and crashed) on debt.

As a manufacturer of laboratory equipment (cabinets, vent hoods and work surfaces) Kewaunee is in a strong position to take advantage of Washington’s trillion-dollar spending spree. As the biotech industry continues to grow and as more and more high-tech school labs are built, Kewaunee’s phone is going to be ringing a lot.

I am not saying to buy shares of the company right this instant – prices have risen a lot of the last six months – but it is worthy of your watch list.

I know it is at the top of mine. Our subscribers may be reading more about this winner in the months ahead.

Source: A Small-Cap Blue Chip

Here in the United States, at a cost of a mere $3 billion, the “Cash-for-Clunkers” program appears to have given new hope to the U.S. auto industry.

But that new hope is destined to be short-lived.

It’s true that – in terms of value delivered for the money invested – “Cash for Clunkers” has eclipsed every other stimulus program that has been tried. But the program has a projected lifespan of only three months, meaning it can’t reverse the powerful global forces that are destined to turn the U.S. auto market from leader to laggard on the global stage.

Financial Crisis Fallout Reshapes Sector

Thanks to the financial crisis whose impact continues to be felt, worldwide automobile demand had dropped on an overall basis since 2008.

But regional differences are already emerging.

In the United States, for instance, the benchmark seasonally adjusted annual sales rate (SAAR) finally jumped up past the 11-million mark in July after failing to eclipse the “breakeven point” of 10 million vehicles in any prior month this year. But the actual year-to-date sales of 5.81 million vehicles through July was still 33% below the 8.55 million that had been sold by that point in 2008, and is 67% below the all-time annual record of 17.4 million achieved in 2000 and 65% below the decade average of 16.4 million.

(Prior to the global financial crisis and accompanying recession – which prompted the U.S. auto industry to restructure and shift its breakeven point down to 10 million vehicles – the breakeven point was actually 16 million vehicle sales in a year. Below that point, several or all of the U.S. “Big Three” would be spinning their wheels in red ink.)

It’s a much different story abroad, however, where several markets are in a long-term growth mode. In India, for example, sales were up 31% on a year-over-year basis, while auto sales in China were an astonishing 70% above those of a year ago. Even if U.S. auto sales continue to improve, China’s automobile market may outsell its U.S. counterpart for a full year for the first time ever.

Granted, India’s auto market – around 2.5 million cars and light trucks a year – is still much smaller than either China or the United States. However, its growth makes it comparable to the Japanese or German markets, the next largest automobile markets after its U.S. and China counterparts.

Thus, global automobile sales are undergoing a major reorientation towards Asia and away from the United States and Europe. This will inevitably have a huge effect on the structure of the sector.

That’s why Asia will become the new Detroit – the future center of the automaking world.

Gone For Good?

In the United States, General Motors Corp. and Chrysler Group LLC have lost market share because of the government takeover. They are unlikely to get it back in spite of the debt costs they have relinquished through bankruptcy.

For Chrysler, the partnership with Fiat SpA (OTC ADR: FIATY) is unlikely to help much. Fiat is among the weakest of the European companies, and has not been competitive in the United States since the 1980s. The U.S. market is undoubtedly moving toward smaller automobiles. That trend is being “fueled” by the new Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for 2015 and probably by higher fuel taxes for environmental and budget reasons. Nevertheless, it seems unlikely that the Chrysler/Fiat partnership will have the models to compete.

General Motors has the model range to compete in the United States. However, GM is doing much better in China, thanks largely to its joint venture with Shanghai Automotive Industry Corp., which expects to sell 1.4 million vehicles in 2009. Since GM is also selling Opel, its European operation, GM (NYSE:GRM) will find itself driven primarily by the demands of the Chinese market. Given the growth of that market, it will probably make the most economic sense for GM to become Chinese-owned. Politics may delay this, but probably only for a few years.

The United States’ One “Better Idea”

Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) has picked up market share in the United States from GM and Chrysler’s problems. It should benefit both from “Cash for Clunkers,” and from the early stages of the U.S. market recovery. If GM and Chrysler continue to have difficulties, Ford may be in a good position here in the large U.S. market – as the most-effective manufacturer of the large automobiles that Americans continue to prefer – no matter what the government tells Ford to do.

Nor is that Ford’s only competitive advantage going forward. Ford Europe is big and viable enough to allow Ford to remain credible as a producer of smaller cars, primarily in the higher price brackets.

Outside the United States, European manufacturers will find themselves increasingly confined to the luxury end of the market. However, as global incomes rise and the newly wealthy become brand-conscious – particularly in the emerging economies of Asia – that upscale portion of the auto market should continue to be strong.

Japanese and Korean manufacturers will continue to dominate their domestic markets. And such companies as Honda Motor Co. Ltd. (NYSE ADR: HMC), Toyota Motor Corp. (NYSE ADR: TM) and Kia Motors Corp., will also do well in the United States and Europe, and in countries where they have been able to establish viable local manufacturing operations, and lower labor costs.

But it will be the players from China and India who are destined to be the big market-share gainers on a global basis.

The New Leaders

For U.S. investors, India’s Tata Motors Ltd. (NYSE ADR: TTM) is the best known of the newly emerging global auto elite. Tata’s $2,500 for-the-masses “Nano” car has been well received. Over the long term, the Nano may expand the entry-level portion of the worldwide auto market, forcing other manufacturers to produce equivalent low-price models.

Indeed, the introduction of $2,500 cars may greatly expand the market’s size in India and other emerging markets, much as Ford’s Model T did after its introduction in 1908, or the Volkswagen AG (OTC ADR: VLKAY) VW Beetle did in the 1950s and 1960s.

Tata looked to be in financial difficulty after it bought the loss-making Jaguar and Land Rover brands in 2008 at the top of the market. However, the $300 million loan for its Jaguar Land Rover Unit announced on Aug. 10 gives Tata the room it needed to maneuver. Market growth in India, combined with the strength of its Tata Group parent now suggest that Tata Motors has the strength to survive without dismemberment.

The bottom line: Tata and its India-based competitors – Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. (Mumbai: MSIL) and Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. (London: MHID) – as well as such top China carmakers as Chery Automobile Co. Ltd. (still publicly owned), Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd. (OTC: GELYF) and Great Wall Motor Co. (OTC: GWLLF), are thus the companies that will see most growth in the automotive market of the decade to come.

By 2020, the global auto sector will look nothing like it does today. Given that most of the muscle will be in Asia, investors shouldn’t be surprised.

Source: Why Asia Will Supplant Detroit as the Global Center of the Auto Industry

The stock is still a far cry from its record-high level of $83.56, but is only 0% below its 52-week high of $53.46.  Much has changed since then, as the U.S. auto industry is no longer producing the 16 million cars it produced in 2007, nor the 13 million it managed to sell last year.  This year we are looking at some 10 million units sold, according to J.D. Power and Associates, the leading forecaster in the industry.

But there is encouraging news:  The very quick restructuring of both General Motors Corp. (NYSE: GRM) and Chrysler Group LLC, the U.S. Federal Reserve’s efforts to stabilize the financial markets, and the U.S. government’s fiscal stimulus plans have helped keep the economy from falling into a depression.  The Fed’s support for the auto industry included buying auto receivables under the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF) program, in order to restart this type of securitization.

Therefore, the paralysis of sales that we saw late last year, when the financial system froze and there was no financing available, has subsided and sales are increasing.  In fact, J.D. Power expects U.S. vehicle sales to increase to 11.5 million units next year, a full 15% pickup from projected 2009 levels.

In fact, we are already seeing an increase in auto sales already, thanks in no small part to the government’s Car Allowance Rebate System (CARS), popularly known as “Cash for Clunkers.” So far, CARS has spent some $1.29 billion and Congress has expanded the original $1 billion authorization by another $2 billion.

Total light vehicle sales for July were just shy of 1 million units, a milestone the industry hasn’t topped since August 2008, mostly due to the program’s success.

This shot in the arm on the back of the general cost restructuring that Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) is carrying out under Allan Mulally has already prompted Ford to increase production of its Focus model.

Similarly, Chrysler has reported that it is running two plants in overtime and a third shift at another plant just to keep up with demand.  And GM, which is seeing a huge rebound in sales, will add to this by increasing advertising spending and selling new cars on eBay Inc.’s (Nasdaq: EBAY) popular online auction Web site. Most of Wall Street is in “wait-and-see” mode, which gives us more of an incentive to jump in.  But the steel story is not just about cars.

Nucor will not only profit from the remaining $1.75 billion to be deployed through the government’s cash for clunkers program and the general improvement in market conditions, but on the pick-up in government construction in the United States that will result from U.S. President Barack Obama’s massive fiscal stimulus.

Additionally, the company will benefit from the already massive stimuli being deployed in China, Brazil, India and Russia.  And let us not forget Europe, where the European Central Bank will soon consider raising its benchmark lending rate to 1.25% from its current record low of 1% in order to prevent inflationary expectations from building up.

China will achieve more than 8% growth this year, driven by public spending, especially in construction and a strong pickup in auto sales  (up 63.6% in July from a year earlier) and domestic appliances.  All of these have a very high content of steel.

Similarly, India’s gross domestic product (GDP) will grow by more than 6%, barely down from last year’s 6.7% expansion. Auto sales in India jumped 18% last month.  Remember that India’s Tata Motors Ltd. (NYSE ADR: TTM) launched the cheapest car in the world last January and this is likely to work wonders in today’s budget-conscious market.

So what about Nucor itself?

The company reported a second quarter loss of $133 million, which improved over the first quarter’s $189 million loss.  But the key is that volumes are already turning around.

Volumes increased 11% in the second quarter, which allowed the company to increase its capacity utilization from 45% to a still very low 46%.

And this is where the upside lies.

In capital-intensive industries like steel, the very high fixed costs induce very large swings in profits, depending on volumes.  And not only did Nucor see its volumes pick up in the second quarter, the trend should continue accelerating in the third quarter and beyond, thanks to the recent burst in car sales and increased government infrastructure spending.

In addition, prior to the cash for clunkers program, Nucor announced it already expected to see an improvement in its third-quarter results. The company said that many of its customers had run their inventories too low and would need to replenish them just to meet demand.

So, at reporting time, investors could be very positively surprised by Nucor and many other companies in the sector, which will provoke many analysts to increase their stock targets.

And to make the whole story even better, we are counting on increasing inflationary expectations and a weaker dollar, which will continue to drive portfolio managers to hedge this risk in commodity stocks.

That means Nucor, which has been bumping into strong resistance levels since the beginning of January, but making higher lows in every subsequent correction, is likely to break out of its current range with an explosive rally before it even reports third-quarter earnings.

Nucor stock closed down 92 cents, or 1.93%, Friday at $46.79 a share.

Source: Nucor Corporation Will Get Is Due for a Boost from Government Spending

How would you like to have been the guy that bought shares of Ford (NYSE:F) when they dipped to a 27-year low of $1.01 back in November? If you were lucky enough to have made the move, a thousand-dollar investment would now be worth just shy of $7,500.

Thanks to today’s news that the company saw its first year-over-year sales increase since late 2007, shares of the company are up by about 6%.

Of course the success comes to the detriment of its recently bankrupt competitors, General Motors and Chrysler, which announced declines of 19.4% and 9%, respectively.

While the quick billion-dollar burst of the Clash-for-Clunkers plan will get all the credit from Washington, there are several factors involved in the surge in buying.

First, with bankruptcy filings now in the history books, the market is filled with much less risk and uncertainty. That means wary buyers now know who will be around next year and who will be joining the growing list of economic casualties.

Of course, Cash for Clunkers is making its mark. But only time will tell if last month’s figures are destined to become an anomaly as the funding eventually dries up and vanishes or if buyers will continue shopping even when the free money runs out.

More importantly that what is compelling buyers to head back to dealerships is the list of companies bound to profit from the government’s free money and the turnaround in demand.

Who gets my tax dollars?

Ford is obviously one beneficiary. And with the market bidding shares of the company up today, the market has already spoken its obvious bullishness for the company’ s future revenue-generating potential.

Some other companies worthy of the attention they are getting today are the big dealerships, like Sonic Automotive (NYSE:SAH). Shares of the small-cap company are up by double-digit proportions as the market re-figures the impact of several billion dollars worth of new-car buying.

With nearly 140 dealership franchises, you can bet the company’s bean counters are preparing for a few extra zeroes on the next accounting statements, especially if the Senate caves later this week and dishes another round of cash.

Of course, the nation’s automotive supply chain runs deep. Some analysts even draw it as long as the corner donut shop down the street (blame the unions).

A bit further upstream than the donut shops, look at the action at ever-volatile Dana Holding (NYSE:DAN). Shares of the parts maker are soaring by 20% today as investors rush to get in before Detroit makes a rebound that mirrors the broad market’s recent moves.

Now, before you get all jumpy thinking today’s action will continue for weeks or even months, let me explain how hype-driven investments work.

Rule number 1: It doesn’ t last.

Rule number 2: If the government is in charge, be cautious.

Rule number 3: Take your profits and run.

This message is not so much for the folks looking to get into a few goods stocks, but for the investors looking for a signal to get out.

Volatility is getting sheepishly low. It scares me.

Stocks don’t like to make broad turnarounds when everybody is looking. Instead, they do it when nobody is looking. Or, more succinctly, when presidents exclaim, “mission accomplished.”

If you want to be greedy and stick it out, you have a few more days. But in auto industry, I am a seller, especially after today’s moves.

There are simply too many other under-valued, low-risk plays to be made to be investing in an industry running on government whims.

Source: Three Winners from Cash for Clunkers

Speaking of open interest numbers, gold o.i. on Thursday fell 3,216 contracts to 391,144…on absolutely monstrous volume of 174,662 contracts. Silver’s decline was much more modest…only 93 contracts to 96,309…on total volume of 18,664 contracts.

The Commitment of Traders report issued yesterday, was as expected. In silver, the bullion banks decreased their net short position by 1,522 contracts. This doesn’t seem like a very big number, but it’s impressive because o.i. fell in the face of a silver price that rose quite a bit during the reporting week. The full color COT report is linked here.

Gold o.i. was exactly as expected…with the bullion banks going short against every long…effectively stopping the gold rally in its tracks. The bullion banks increased their net short position by a staggering [but not surprising] 21,939 contracts. The bullion banks are now net short 204,226 contracts…20.4 million ounces. The full-color COT graph for gold is linked here.

We are now sitting with a COT structure that is bullish to very bullish for silver…and very bearish for gold. This situation has only existed a few times during the last ten years. Ted suggested [and not for the first time] that maybe ‘da boyz’ are trying to permanently separate silver and gold prices so that silver will rise independently of gold. That’s possible…but we’ll have to wait and see if it pans out that way.

The Comex Delivery Report for Friday showed that only 55 gold contracts were delivered…and nothing at all in silver. There were no changes in the alleged holdings of either GLD or SLV. The U.S. Mint has updated their production numbers in silver eagles again. This time they showed that another 275,000 silver eagles were minted…bringing the monthly total up to 2,300,000. Nothing was added for gold eagles. And the Comex-approved warehouses reported that 320,392 ounces of silver were withdrawn from their collective inventories.

The usual N.Y. gold commentator mentioned that The Gartman Letter’s buy stop at $955 was not triggered yesterday because gold did not, in fact, trade long enough above that price to trigger its buy. He also had this…”There is a good deal of commotion today regarding forecasts that China will pass India in gold consumption in some five years. It is odd that so many observers extrapolate about the intensely volatile Indian gold market based on a few months recent history. At the time of the enormous imports last summer, the talk might well have been of India monopolizing the world gold stock! In any case, China’s gold production, bolstered by subsidized fuel and the hugely undervalued Yuan apparently supplies almost all local demand (India mines almost no gold). How seriously can one take the Shanghai Gold Exchange, which today reports that the gold contract is backed by only 156 kilos of metal? The Bloomberg story is headlined “China May Overtake India in Gold Demand, Council Says”..and the link is here.”

The other day, several companies [i.e. Ford (NYSE:F), eBay (NASDAQ:EBAY) and AT&T (NYSE:T)] reported better than expected earnings and as a result, the stock market rallied on the news. While some companies have reported better than expected earnings for Q2/2009, others have struggled. Today’s chart provides some perspective on the current earnings environment by focusing on 12-month, as reported, S&P 500 earnings. You can see how earnings are expected [38% of S&P 500 companies have reported for Q2/2009] to have declined over 98% since peaking in Q3/2007, making this by far the largest decline on record…and the data goes back to 1936. I thank P.S. for providing this data…which is all [including the chart] courtesy of www.chartoftheday.com …the link to the website is here.

Besides the Bloomberg story embedded in the usual N.Y. gold commentator’s paragraph above, I have three other stories for your reading pleasure this weekend. The first is from yesterday’s edition of The Economist out of London. It bears the headline “Here today, gone by 2010: Russia reserve fund is emptying fast.” The story is certainly worth the read…and I thank P.S. for sending it along. The link is here.

The next story is from the hallowed halls of the The New York Times. It’s a story about high-frequency trading—which has become one of the most talked-about and mysterious forces in the markets. Casey Research’s own Bud Conrad was circulating this story around the company yesterday…and I thought it worthy of your time. It’s entitled “Stock Traders Find Speed Pays, in Milliseconds”…and the link is here.

The last story today is from commodityonline.com…and filed from Johannesburg. The title pretty much says it all…”New law boosts gold bar sale in South Africa.” Until I read this story, I wasn’t aware that South Africans were not allowed to own gold in bar form. You learn something new every day. The link is here.

Throughout all my years of investing, I’ve found that the big money was never made in the buying or the selling…the big money was made in the waiting. – Jesse Livermore

Today’s ‘blast from the past’ goes back to 1972. I believe that this was their biggest, if not their only, hit. But what a hit it was. Turn up your speakers and then click here.

Something appears to be up in the gold and silver market…which the latest COT confirms. Further rallies in gold never amount to much when the bullion banks are short this amount of gold. Sure, I’ve seen their short position as high as 26 million ounces…which is 55,000 contracts higher than we are today…so I guess we can go higher, but the odds are not in our favor. How high we go from here [if we do go higher] depends entirely on whether the bullion banks are prepared to take on an even larger short position. But once that high [whatever, and whenever it is] is in, there is only one direction gold can go…down. Will silver go with it? Don’t know, but Ted Butler says that they would have to get the price below its latest low, which is around $12.40…about $1.50 below where it closed yesterday…before there would be any more significant long liquidation by the tech funds and the small traders. The 200-day moving average is at $12.29. Ted doesn’t think they can do it. We’ll see.

I note in closing that this is the last edition of Casey’s Daily Resource Plus. I hope that you have found it to be both educational and entertaining. Many parts of it will be shuffled off into other reports…and as most of you already know, I’ve been fortunate enough to be given my own daily stand-alone column. That honor is entirely because of you, dear reader…and for that, I’m grateful, appreciative…and thankful.

Enjoy the rest of your weekend and I’ll see you next week with a brand new look…which I look forward to seeing for the first time myself…as I haven’t seen it yet either.

Source: And Then There’s This…Monday, July 27, 2009

Source: Investment News Briefs Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Source: Another Dismal Earnings Season for U.S. Companies?