Fast-growing industry and a reliance on coal-fired power plants turned China into the world’s largest emitter of greenhouse gas a few years ago. Clouds of smog far thicker than that of Los Angeles hang over many of its cities and much of the water is densely polluted. But that’s something the central government aims to change.

China plans to reduce energy consumption per unit of its gross domestic product (GDP) by 20% of 2005 levels by the end of next year. It’s more immediate goal is to reduce reliance on coal-fired plants to 60% of its energy production from 70%, and replace with renewable energy sources like wind and solar.

Since 2007, about 54 gigawatts – about 7% of the nation’s electricity-generating capacity – of coal and oil-fired power plants have been closed down as part of the effort to reduce carbon emissions.

Alternative energy sources, including wind, solar, and hydropower, are in line to replace fossil fuels. China’s market for green technology could reach $1 trillion annually, or about 15% of the country’s forecast 2013 GDP, according to a report released last week by the China Greentech Initiative and the American Chamber of Commerce.

“Climate change brings a range of new risks and challenges for business, but it is also creating huge opportunities, particularly in the greentech sectors,” Richard Gledhill, global leader on climate change and carbon market services for consultancy PricewaterhouseCoopers, told the People’s Daily. “The International Energy Agency predicts that we will have to spend an additional $9 trillion over the next 20 years to deliver a stabilization scenario of two degrees Celsius.”

Already solar companies in China are benefiting from the government’s push for clean technology.  China plans to install more than 500 megawatts of solar pilot projects in two to three years.

“Given the nascent nature of China’s solar domestic market, this 500 mW program, though not huge, sends a strong signal that China is serious about developing its domestic solar market, and will undoubtedly stimulate more activity in domestic deployment by enterprises outside of the subsidy program,” Julian Wong, a senior policy analyst with the Center for American Progress, told the People’s Daily.

The central government could raise its 2020 solar power generation target more than fivefold to at least 10 gigawatts, the paper reported. Analysts expect that more than two gigawatts of new solar capacity will be installed by 2011, up from about 100 megawatts in 2008.

To help the country meet its goal, the central government in July said it would subsidize 50% of investment for solar projects as well as transmission and distribution systems that connect to grid networks. The subsidy rises to 70% for independent photovoltaic power generating systems in remote regions of the country that have no power supply.

However, Chinese solar companies aren’t just benefiting from the growing market of the mainland. Many are now building factories in the United States to bypass protectionist legislation. They’re also encouraging executives to join industry trade groups to squelch any anti-Chinese sentiment.

One such company is Suntech Power Holdings Co. (NYSE ADR: STP), which earlier this year said it plans to build a factory in the Southwest United States. The company said it is exploring opportunities in several states as it seeks to expand its presence in the U.S. solar market.

“It’ll be to facilitate sales — ‘buy American’ and things like that,” Steven Chan, Suntech’s head of global sales and marketing told The New York Times.

However, Suntech Chief Executive Officer Shi Zhengrong told The Times in an interview that 90% of the workers at the $30 million factory will be blue-collar laborers welding together panels from solar wafers made in China. And because of the generous subsidies it receives from Beijing, Suntech can sell solar panels on the U.S. market for less than the cost of the materials, assembly and shipping.

Yingli Green Energy Holding Co. (NYSE ADR: YGE), another large Chinese manufacturer, announced last week that it also had a “preliminary plan” to build solar panels in the United States, The Times reported.

Suntech is on track to pass Germany’s Q-Cells SE as the world’s No. 2 supplier of photovoltaic cells. After losing $69 million before interest and tax in the first half of the year, Q-Cells said it would cut 500 jobs – nearly a fifth of its workforce. Two other German solar companies – Conergy and Solarworld – also reported steep losses and are fighting for survival.

“A large part of the German solar cell and solar module manufacturers will not survive,” UBS AG analyst Patrick Hummel told the Financial Times Germany newspaper.

Both Conergy and Solarworld have accused Chinese manufacturers of dumping and called on Western governments to protect the solar industry with import tariffs on Chinese products. But so far there has been no action on the part of U.S. and European governments.

“It’s absolutely disgraceful that [U.S. President Barack] Obama is going around the world saying we will not resort to protectionist measures against China when they’re stealing the solar-panel business out from under us,” Peter Morici, an economist at the University of Maryland and former chief economist of the U.S. International Trade Commission, told The San Diego Union-Tribune.

Morici noted that China’s protectionist measures include a requirement that 75% of the content of government-purchased solar panels be Chinese-made. The United States has no such requirement.

In response to critics, Suntech’s Shi insists that his firm is helping the solar industry by making the technology more affordable.

“Western countries worry about the dramatic price reduction and talk about dumping. That shows a protectionist attitude. That’s wrong,” Shi told the United Kingdom’s Guardian. “We must work together to promote and utilise each other’s strengths.”

China recently  took a big step toward enhancing cooperation with Western solar companies by signing a deal with the Phoenix-based First Solar (Nasdaq: FSLR) to build the world’s largest solar plant.

The 2,000 megawatt complex will be built in Ordos City in Inner Mongolia by 2019. At that size, it would be about 30 times larger than any existing solar power stations in Europe.

“There are a few existing solar projects of about 50 to 60 megawatts, but this would be the biggest by a country mile,” Charles Yonts, an analyst specializing in alternative energy at CLSA Ltd. in Hong Kong, told Bloomberg. “China is suggesting the solar market will be up to 20,000 megawatts by 2020, but the scale of this project suggests these estimates are far too conservative.”

First Solar will consider solar module and manufacturing sites in Ordos City as part of the agreement.

The deal raised the eyebrows of many industry leaders who were skeptical about China’s willingness to work with Western companies.

“If you announce that we have such a huge need for solar panels that we are even going to put First Solar panels into China, all of a sudden we’ve gone from this massive threat to maybe we saw it the wrong way around,” Stephan Dolezalek, managing director of Silicon Valley-based venture capital firm VantagePoint Venture Partners, told Reuters.

“Maybe we should see the size of the Chinese market as this enormous upside potential, and maybe all of solar should be seeing it much more positively.”

BrightSource Energy Chief Executive Officer John Woolward said his company is moving “slowly and deliberately” to find a partner in China, while Tom Werner, chief executive of the California-based SunPower Corp. (Nasdaq: SPWRA) said the deal “clearly makes use more bullish on China.”

“We hope that that will result in us being able to penetrate that market as well,” he added.

Source: Solar Energy’s Future Shines Brightest in China

Oil prices have recovered, climbing over $60 a barrel, the recent stock market rally has lured many investors back off the sidelines, and President Barack Obama’s clean energy agenda has breathed some life back into the browbeaten sector.

Now, solar energy stocks – some that lost more than two-thirds of their value last year – have come roaring back.

After topping $300 a share last spring, shares of First Solar Inc. (Nasdaq: FSLR) plummeted to just $85.28 a share in November. But since then the company has bounced back, soaring 125% to Friday’s close of $191.72 a share.  Shares of Trina Solar Ltd. (NYSE: TSL) hit $52 last summer before bottoming out at $5.61 in November. That stock is up more than 260% since Nov. 21.

Global economic growth is far from guaranteed at this early stage, but there’s good reason to believe that when a recovery does get underway, solar stocks will be shooting for the moon.

California’s Gold Standard

While many other solar energy companies have collapsed under the weight of the economic downturn, a small upstart out of California has managed to greatly expand its business.

That company is BrightSource Energy, which last week agreed to what the company’s Chief Executive Officer, John Woolard, called the “the largest solar deal in the world.”

Pacific Gas and Electric Co. agreed to purchase 1,310 megawatts (MW) of solar thermal power from BrightSource Energy for a sum that analysts’ believe tops $3 billion.

BrightSource had already agreed to transmit 900 MW of solar power to PG&E in a deal that analysts valued at $2 billion to $3 billion. The terms of the new deal, which expands upon the original 900MW agreement, will build on top of that figure.

BrightSource plans to build seven solar power plants in the Mojave desert of California that will use mirrors to direct sunlight onto a group of centralized water towers to create steam that will, in turn, power turbines. PG&E estimates that the amount of energy produced by the plants will be sufficient enough to power 530,000 homes.

Earlier this year, BrightSource signed a similar 1,300 MW agreement with Southern California Edison Co. – an indication that, despite economic hardship, the solar energy business is still hot.

But a lot of BrightSource’s recent activity has to do with California’s newly adopted state energy policy. In 2006, California passed a law that required electrical utilities to get 20% of their power from renewable sources by 2010.

However, on November 17, 2008, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger took the state’s green energy mandate further by signing Executive Order S-14-08, which requires that utilities generate 33% of their power through renewable sources by 2020.

Indeed, the state of California has led the country in adopting renewable sources of energy, particularly solar.

Renewable energy accounts for 13.5% of the state’s energy consumption, and for the past three years, the California Energy Commission has been managing $400 million targeted for solar on new residential building construction. That includes an ambitious “Million Solar Roof” initiative that will create 3,000 megawatts of installed photovoltaic capacity by 2018.

But California is more than an energy pioneer. It’s an early indication of where U.S. energy policy is headed.

If President Barack Obama’s administration has its way, mandates similar to those issued in California will be employed across the country over the next 10 years. In fact, they already are.

Solar Shift

Obama announced Tuesday that he is making California’s standard for vehicle fuel efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions the new national standard.

Under Obama’s new proposals, vehicles would be 30% cleaner and more fuel efficient by 2016. And that’s just the beginning.

The President’s budget incorporated $646 billion in revenue from capping global-warming pollution, while allocating $150 billion to renewable energy investment over the next 10 years, making his green-funding initiative the largest such effort in U.S. history.

Among other things, Obama’s recent stimulus package provides a tax credit of up to 30% for home solar installations.

The Obama administration also advocates a policy that would require 25% of U.S. electricity demand be met by renewable energy by 2025. The President has the support of the Democrat-led Congress. U.S. Sen. Jeff Bingaman, (D – N.M.), Chair of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, is working on legislation that aims to make 20% of U.S. energy demand renewable by 2021.

While a renewable energy policy was largely neglected by the administration of George W. Bush, Obama’s effort can hardly be described as partisan. It is more representative of a shift in political ideology that arose when gas prices soared above $4 per gallon last summer.

A recent Gallup Poll showed that the majority of Americans support higher fuel efficiency standards such as those Obama announced Tuesday. In March, 80% of Americans said they favored higher fuel efficiency standards for automobiles.

Currently, just 28 states have renewable energy goals, but with the Obama administration’s effort and a shift in public opinion, it won’t be long before all 50 are enacting their alternative energy mandates.

According to a study by Allianz Global Investors, 78% of investors think green technology could be the “next great American industry,” and 97% of investors believe the development of alternative fuel sources will remain important even if oil prices remain relatively low.

And statistics bear that out. Venture capitalists invested $4.1 billion in alternative energy projects in 2008 – a 54% increase from the year prior, according to a report by PricewaterhousCoopers. What’s more, 45% of that money went to solar projects, compared to 23% in 2007.

“Alternative energy’s rise isn’t going to be smooth, but it’s going to be one of the great new growth industries,” Steven Berexa, managing director of research for RCM Informed, an Allianz subsidiary, told Kiplinger’s Personal Finance magazine.

A Global Industry

In addition to the United States, solar energy is gaining traction around the world.

After subsidizing 2,400 MW of solar projects last year, the Spanish government will subsidize an additional 500 MW this year. Japan aims to create more than 100,000 new jobs in its solar industry as part of an effort to jumpstart its flailing economy. Proposals for solar energy plants are also being considered in the Middle East and northern Africa.

Even BrightSource’s Woolard has attributed some of his company’s success to its overseas operations.

“PG&E looked hard at what we’d done,” Woolard told The San Francisco Chronicle. “They looked at the results from our plant in Israel, and that built a lot of confidence that we were meeting milestones and delivering.”

Most recently, Australia announced plans to build a solar power station that will rival BrightSource’s Southern California operation. The network is expected to produce about 1,000 MW of energy, but won’t be operational until at least 2015.

“We don’t want to be clean energy followers worldwide, we want to be clean energy leaders worldwide,” Prime Minister Kevin Rudd told the Financial Times.

The Australian government hopes renewable energy will account for 20% of the country’s power grid by 2020. Rudd said the government intends to spend about $1 billion (A$1.4 billion) of the $3.6 billion (A$4.7 billion) it has pledged to clean energy initiatives over the next decade.

Like in the United States, the Australian government hopes its alternative energy initiative will be a catalyst for private investment. John Connor, head of the Sydney-based Climate Institute, told the FT that Australia’s clean energy plan will drive an estimated $15.5 billion (A$20 billion) in private investment.

Another country with an ambitious solar agenda is China. A country with notoriously high greenhouse gas emissions, China installed about 50MW of solar capacity last year, more than double the 20 MW in 2007, Renewable Energy World reported.

Beijing plans to expand the installed capacity to 1,800 MW by 2020, as the demand for new solar modules in China could be as high as 232 MW each year from now until 2012.

China is also a good place to find promising solar companies. LDK Solar Co. Ltd. (NYSE ADR: LDK), Yingli Green Energy Holding Co. Ltd. (NYSE ADR:YGE), and JA Solar Holdings Co. Ltd. (NYSE ADR: JASO) have all been beaten down by the market, but could post a strong rebound when China’s solar initiative takes full flight.

Many analysts also like the aforementioned First Solar and Trina Solar Ltd., which stand a better shot of withstanding the recession because of their size and experience.

[Editor’s Note: Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald is the editor of the new Geiger Index trading service. As the whipsaw trading patterns investors have endured this year have shown, the ongoing global financial crisis has changed the investment game forever.

Uncertainty is now the norm and that new reality alone has created a whole set of new rules that will help determine who profits and who loses. Investors who ignore this “New Reality”will struggle, and will find their financial forays to be frustrating and unrewarding. But investors who embrace this change will not only survive – they will thrive. With the Geiger Index, Fitz-Gerald has already isolated these new rules and has unlocked the key to what he refers to as “Golden Age of Wealth Creation” The Geiger Index system allows Fitz-Gerald to predict the price movements of broad indexes, or of individual stocks, with a high degree of certainty. And it’s particularly well suited to the kind of market we’re all facing right now. Check out our latest report on these new rules, and on this new market environment.

Source: Is the Dark Cloud Over Solar Energy Beginning to Break?

Ready to burn an extra $3,000 each year? As if energy prices were not creating enough havoc throughout this country, the Obama administration is getting ready to pounce on the idea of a cap-and-trade system.

There is a good chance their plans could cost each of us a few extra grand each year.

Call the extra figures that will trickle into our monthly energy bills an investment on the future. Or call the increased costs a “usage” fee that goes straight to Uncle Sam. Just don’t call it a tax, as we all know Obama is a tax-cutter.

It is too early to tell if Congress will be naïve or stupid enough to pass any sort of cap-and-trade legislation in the near future, but it is certainly not too early to hear some of the nation’s best and brightest investors calling the idea what it is.

“Monstrously stupid,” is what Berkshire Hathaway’s vice chairman, Charlie Munger, called Obama’s plan.

Even if the majority of credits were given to the nation’s carbon-producing industries, Obama’s cap-and-trade system would almost instantly raise the price of just about every product and service sold in this country. It stands to be the most ineffective, yet most dangerous tax in the nation’s history.

Even so, emotional, feel-good investors are finding a way to profit.

Unsustainable investing

If you visit these pages often, you probably know my disdain for the green-energy industry runs deep.

It’s not that I hate Mother Nature and want to see the earth shrivel up and die (in another career I am an outdoors writer and nature junky). My hatred of the green investing movement is due to its infallible record of destroying wealth.

I started my career as a financial advisor, and my fiduciary duty to protect wealth still runs deep.

For generations folks have been working on electric cars, super-efficient solar panels and waste-based fuel sources. It has been one of the most predictable cyclical markets in history. Invest when energy prices are high. Lose money when prices naturally decline.

One company on track to lock investors into the cycle is First Solar (NASDAQ:FSLR). The company and its low-cost solar panels are making its in-and-out investors a pile of short-term profits. But if you are a set-it-and-forget-it kind of investor, you had better pay attention. The action will not last.

Set your sights on a long-term investment in anything solar, and you might as well forget about profits. The momentum fostered over the last six months or so is simply not sustainable. The government will not be handing out billions in stimulus for the next thirty years (I hope). New venture capital won’t be spurring the industry in a race to be a first mover. And most importantly, consumer demand will have long moved onto the next trend. We are a fickle nation.

Let’s face it. With current technology, solar panels cannot provide the kind of reliable energy the average consumer needs. Sure, a handful of “greens” will build their houses in a cloudless desert to make themselves feel good. But for those of us that live in area where moisture rules the middle atmosphere, solar panels are nothing more than expensive yard art.

So here’s my advice. If you can make a trading move with relative speed, invest away. The “green” industry will do well over the next six months while Congress gains votes debating cap and trade.

But if you are risk adverse and are investing for retirement, stay away. Stick with proven industries with high-quality revenue streams.

Until science is no longer a political debate (when did that start, anyway?), the solar industry will be too unpredictable for quality-minded investors.

Source: Solar Investing: My apologies in Advance

This from Penny Sleuth:

We don’t play politics at Penny Sleuth. Frankly, we can’t agree on politics. But that doesn’t mean smart investors should ignore what Washington’s doing. Some of the largest profits in history spawned from legislation and court rulings.

Take solar energy for example. After the introduction of the Solar Energy Research and advancement Act of 2007, investors watched as solar companies’ share prices exploded.

One of the biggest winners was First Solar Inc (NASDAQ:FSLR). The bill was brought before the House of Representatives on June 19, 2007. Over the next 12 months, First Solar’s shares jumped 300%.

Another was SunPower Corp (NASDAQ:SPWRA). SunPower’s shares blew up 151% in just six months.

Both of these gains can be directly contributed to a small bill being read in the House. This can happen on any particular day with any particular piece of legislation. We never know which bill or act will cause such run ups. But after November 4, we have a pretty good idea.

Obama Profit Opportunity No. 1:
Science’s Most Important Breakthrough in Centuries

While on the campaign trail, Barack Obama called for the ban on stem cells to be peeled back. He said that we have a duty to advance science in any way we can to cure the sick and improve the health of the world.

This should send all stem cell stocks through the roof. But if investors can pinpoint the right biotech/R&D firm, they’ll see the largest of these gains. Potentially collecting triple or even quadruple digit profits.

Fractured Spinal Cord? No Problem

Neuralstem Inc (AMEX:CUR) is an industry leader in Human Neural Stem Cell technology. Simply put, Neuralstem is working on cures for central nervous system diseases. The company currently has four issued patents and 12 more pending. Each of these are crucial to the industry. It limits competition, while providing a lucrative asset for future growth.

These patents cover a specific regenerative process where neural stem cells are administered to the area where a spinal cord fracture occurred. These stem cells grow and heal the fracture, which restores motor functions to the parts of the body where it’s been cut off.

For instance, if someone falls and fractures their spinal cord, there’s a good chance that person will lose control over the lower half of his or her body. In the past, that person would never be able to walk again. With Neuralstem’s technology, a simple injection can restore the person’s control.

Currently, the market values Neuralstem at just $51 million. Shares can be bought for around $1.60. That’s obviously too cheap. It’ll only take one bill, announcement, or speech to send shares flying. It appears that the stem cell ban will be lifted in the first 100 days of the Obama Presidency, so Neuralstem could see a huge boost in early 2009.

Obama Profit Opportunity No. 2:
Fixing Renewable Energy’s Fatal Flaw

There is only a certain amount of time during the day when windmills can produce energy. The average capacity factor for wind power is about 30%. The rest of the time, these windmills sit like giant statues, waiting for the next gust of wind. During that period — the “energy time gap” — no new electricity is going onto the power grids.

The same goes for solar power. The sun doesn’t shine 100% of the time. Even in the vast deserts of the U.S. Southwest in the peak of summer, the sun is up only about 14 hours per day. When it is up, there are problems with cloud coverage. The average capacity factor for solar power is around 25%.

Round-the-Clock Energy Storage

ZBB Energy Corp (AMEX:ZBB) designs and manufactures a special type of fuel cell storage device called Zinc Energy Storage Systems (ZESS). ZBB’s systems are used worldwide in the renewable energy fields. For instance, wind and solar farms use ZESS to store extra energy during peak hours. Then, in off-peak periods (no wind or at night), the ZESS can transmit its stored power to the grid. This system allows for continuous electricity 24 hours a day.

Here’s the best part… It only takes three to four hours to charge a ZESS. That’s plenty of time to store the solar or wind power during peak time. The company sells its systems to wind and solar farms, utilities, and commercial/industrial sites.

Banking on the First 100 Days

Within the first 100 days of Obama’s Administration, the demand will likely multiply. Obama plans to invest $150 billion to help create five million jobs in clean energy over then next 10 years. You can bet that a good portion of that money will be sent to wind and solar farms. Those farms will need to increase efficiency and storage. That’s when they’ll call ZBB.

On top of the spending, Obama has already declared he’ll push for new, strict mandates on energy and efficiency. For instance, he’s calling for 10% of our electricity to come from renewables by 2012 and 25% by 2025.

Obama Profit Opportunity No. 3:
It’s Upgrade Time

Many investors run from the defense industry when they hear a Democrat coming. We think you should jump right in. You see, the largest defense contracts in our nation’s history have come under Democrats. In fact, almost every period of the military buildup has come from a left-of-center White House…with the exception of Ronald Reagan.

As we enter our sixth year of the Iraq War and our eighth year of the one in Afghanistan, our weapons, vehicles, and equipment are desperately overdue for repairs and upgrades.

Whether you are a Democrat or a Republican, you still provide our troops with the best equipment available. It certainly wouldn’t look good for Obama to enter the oval office on day one and cut equipment upgrades to the troops in war zones.

We think he’s going to take the opportunity to “reach across the aisle” and upgrade our military’s technologies and defenses. He’ll want to do that early if he plans to get any of his agenda passed.

Niche Player in a Mega Industry

That’s why we recommend you check out Herley Industries (NASDAQ:HRLY). Herley is a leader in RF microwave and millimeter wave components. These components are crucial to flight instrumentation, weapons sensors, guidance systems, and radars.

The company currently has a backlog of $157 million, with a market cap of just $139 million. Herley’s list of customers include Northrop Grumman, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and the U.S. government.

While you might not have heard of it, Herley has been around since 1965. It’s been designing microwave devices for the defense industry for over 40 years. The company’s technology has been implemented in such projects as the F-16 Falcon, E-2C/D Hawkeye, and the AMRAAM air to air missile.

This kind of background puts it in the front spot for any future defense upgrades. On top of that, it’s stock is extremely cheap. It’s trading at just 0.72 price-to-book, and 0.63 price-to-sales.

Defense is likely a top priority for the incoming Obama Administration. The time is right to jump in on a niche defense company like Herley.

Source: The Three Best Plays for Obama’s First 100 Days

This from Investment U:

Our next President will be faced with unprecedented challenges in health care, energy, global warming, an aging infrastructure and huge “legacy” automobile businesses that are teetering on the verge of bankruptcy.

He’s also being presented with an incredible opportunity… one that, if implemented correctly, could have profoundly positive effects on the economic health of the world, just when we need it.

For years, the engine that fueled global economic growth was the spending of the American consumer. Market crashes because of the dot-coms and the housing boom have left many individuals with too much debt and not enough money. Americans are tapped out, and they’re closing their wallets.

Reinvigorating our economy rests upon jumpstarting consumer spending – and ultimately improving the financial condition of millions of Americans. It’s much easier said than done – and this new administration will have its work cut out for it.

If you’ve got an eye on how these government actions could benefit your bottom line, you should take a look at our past. You might find these newest sources of “economic fuel” and wealth creation look surprisingly familiar. The government’s solution could be just the thing our portfolio needs for a healthy return in the years to come…

The Cause of The Current U.S. Economic Slowdown

Ask most people to give you the cause of the current economic slowdown enveloping the United States and the rest of the world, and their likely answer will be the explosion of housing and the subsequent bubble in the credit markets.

But that was just the peak of the problem, not the beginning. The trouble has its roots in something that started 20 or 30 years ago.

That was when we started seeing the shift away from personal savings in America and toward the beginning of a huge consumer credit crisis.

And now, we are witnessing first-hand the effects of the increasing use of massive leverage can have on the markets, and ultimately on the American consumer. They’re broke and can no longer be the fuel that powers the world’s economic engine.

With consumer spending slowing, layoffs increasing and hiring all but stopped, the prospects for future economic growth aren’t particularly bright. Or are they? We have almost everything we need to fire up the world’s economic engine again: The ingenuity of the American people, plenty of factories, etc.

There’s only one thing missing… the fuel to get it going again. So what’s going to be the new “fuel?” History is a great teacher, and we need look no further than the Great Depression, and Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal.

The New Deal was a series of programs Roosevelt employed between 1933 and 1936 with the intent to provide work for the unemployed, reform of financial and business operations, and economic recovery. Here are a couple of examples:

• The Works Progress Administration (WPA) was the largest of the New Deal agencies. It alone was responsible for providing almost eight million jobs. What did all of those people do? They built public buildings, roads, bridges and other infrastructure projects. Anyone who needed a job could easily become eligible.

• Another program, created by an act of Congress in 1933, was the Tennessee Valley Authority. The TVA, as it was known, was chartered to provide food, navigation and flood control, electrical generation, fertilizer manufacturing and general economic development for the people of the Tennessee Valley, a region hard hit by the Great Depression. And it was just what the doctor ordered: The TVA’s projects were catalysts that fueled unprecedented economic growth in the area that continued through the 1960s. Today, the TVA’s 43 power plants make it one of the largest producers of power in the country.

7 Companies Profiting From a “New” New Deal

While the slowdown we are experiencing is nowhere near as severe as the Great Depression, the solution will be the creation of similar New Deal programs in two specific areas: the infrastructure and energy sectors.

More specifically, developing energy savings, making alternative forms of energy our mainstream sources, and building the green infrastructure to support what will be our growing energy independence.

More insulation in a house’s walls, lower thermostats, fluorescent bulbs, more fuel efficient cars and commercial building energy management systems are just a few of the ways to save energy. Public transportation is another. Expect the new government to provide tax incentives for these and other programs as short-term incentives to save. Companies that stand to benefit are Owens Corning (NYSE:OC): insulation, General Electric (NYSE:GE): lighting and Johnson Controls (NYSE:JCI): energy management systems.

Clearly wind, solar geothermal and tidal energy companies stand to benefit, too. While a comprehensive list is beyond the scope of this article, companies like First Solar (Nasdaq:FSLR): solar panels, Ormat Technologies (NYSE:ORA): geothermal and Vestas Wind Systems (PINK:VWDRY): wind turbines, will do well.

As new green sources of energy begin to come on-line in a big way, the nation’s electrical grids will have to be upgraded to move the power to where it’s needed. This is a huge project, and one of the biggest winners will be ABB (NYSE:ABB): power and automation technologies.

Ironically, the same government that’s trying to find a solution to the energy problems we face has been the biggest roadblock to solving them. The trillion dollar coal and oil subsidies prolong the carbon industry’s advantage over – and are a constant roadblock for – fledgling alternative energy companies.

The new President and his administration have an opportunity to turn the recession ship around, before it runs aground. By implementing new energy and infrastructure projects, thousands of new jobs will be provided at a time when they are desperately needed, and most importantly, these projects will provide the fuel to restart the world’s economic engine.

Source: Obama’s New “Economic Fuel”… and 7 Ways to Profit

If John McCain manages to pull off a surprise victory next week, Martin says biotech stocks will get a boost from fewer restrictions on drug prices.

This from Smart Profits Report:

One week from today, America will elect its next president.

What was a hotly contested race a few weeks ago now appears to be swinging in favor of Democratic candidate Barack Obama, but that doesn’t necessarily mean Election Night will be much less dramatic.

The question is: How will this major event and changing of the White House guard affects the economy, the stock market – and more importantly, individual investors? Many investors are already sick to death of the drama that the stock market has tossed at them this year, so aren’t likely to welcome much more.

Let’s take a look…

The Four-Year Presidential Cycle And Its Impact On The Stock Market

Despite the current rhetoric and hype surrounding the candidates’ respective policies, measures enacted typically don’t make any serious dent on the economy for a year or two after they’re passed into law.

Yale Hirsch, one of the co-authors behind the respected Stock Trader’s Almanac has studied the effect that presidential election cycles have on the stock market. And his research indicates that the market generally follows a pattern, regardless of whether a Republican or Democrat administration wins the White House.

According to the theory, here are the stock market returns between 1948 and 2007…

• The first post-election year is typically the worst performer in the presidential cycle, with the S&P 500 posting a 7.3% return
• The second year sees the highest record of bear market bottoms, with the S&P recording a 10.1% advance.
• In the third year of the presidency, the market picks up dramatically, notching up a 22.9% gain.
• The final year of a presidency sees more uncertainty creep into the market, with a 12.1% gain. That’s still above average, though.

While the past four years haven’t followed the above trend, this is an entirely different time, with the U.S. experiencing an epic financial crisis right on top of the presidential election.

And the market could easily fall back into this pattern… because right on schedule, economists foresee recession conditions over the next two years.

The Post-Election Healthcare Environment

As an investor, if you’re looking for a map of how the next cycle will play out – and who could be affected the most – a lot depends on whether the winning candidate can live up to his promises. But that can depend largely on who controls Congress and the importance of the sector.

For example, areas like healthcare, energy, education, and defense are always going to be pretty heavily funded, no matter who is running the show.

With regard to healthcare, this election is once again filled with candidates’ promises of how they’re going to create affordable healthcare for all Americans – a task that always seems to be easier said than done.

According to the International Strategy and Investment (ISI) research firm, a McCain administration would probably represent good news for firms like Pfizer (NYSE:PFE), Genzyme Corp. (NASDAQ: GENZ) and Genentech (NYSE:DNA), since they’d be less likely to face restrictions on drug prices.

In addition, McCain may not opt for as much of an overhaul of healthcare as Obama, so managed care firms could see an advantage. Obama would seek changes to Medicare and crack down on medical malpractice areas, so look for managed care and insurance companies respectively to undergo Obama’s favorite word… change.

Since both men have espoused unique alternatives to our current system, the healthcare sector will see changes regardless though.

Look To Renewable Energy Firms… No Matter Who Wins

As for energy – one of the hottest spots on the market – both Obama and McCain support crucial efforts to explore alternative energy in order to relieve some of America’s dependence on getting energy from volatile nations.

Earlier this year, McCain even went so far as to offer a $300 million reward for anybody who could design a “battery package that has the size, capacity, cost and power to leapfrog the commercially available plug-in hybrids or electric cars.” And both men attended former president Bill Clinton’s National Clean Energy Summit in Las Vegas, Nevada, back in August.

McCain has also thrown his weight behind greater offshore drilling and “clean coal” production, right alongside ethanol production from corn. Obama has expressed more interest in other forms of alternative energy, such as wind and solar power – two areas that could receive more subsidies and mandates under his administration.

In this respect, ISI says solar leader like First Solar (NASDAQ:FSLR), wind turbine manufacturer Vestas Wind Systems (CPH:VWS) and waste-into-energy firms like Covanta Holding (NYSE:CVA) could see benefits.

The Battle For Headlines: Economy And Market vs. Obama And McCain

The bottom line here is that while both candidates are busy championing their ideas and policy proposals to the country and certain sectors and stocks will benefit more than others from a regime change, the overall stock market isn’t going to be as affected as some people might think.

According to John Merrill, chief investment officer of Tanglewood Wealth Management, the market isn’t really paying that much attention to the candidates, no matter how much both like to speak out. “Today, the market and the economy are shaping events much more than the presidential election.”

Source: The Presidential Election Cycle… What The Obama-McCain Battle Means For Stocks

Since then, however, concerns of oversupply have whacked solar stocks. This prompted Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) to downgrade several solar companies to a “sell”.

J. Cristoph Amberger says the current financial crisis will hurt investment in solar power. He recommends investors sell their positions while they still can.

This from Today’s Financial News:

Two key solar stocks are being hit hard in early indications. First Solar, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLR) had already cut its 52-week high of $317.00 by more than half. Trading below $140 today (down 10%-plus), it’s still twenty bucks above its 52-week low of $124.96.

SunPower Corporation (NASDAQ: SPWRA), too, has been decimated. (In fact, “decimated” — meaning a violent elimination of a tenth! — seems too tame a term to describe what’s happened!) The stock is worth just a third of its 52-week high of $164.49, trading just above its 52-week low of $52 right now.

My own recent recommendation of Yingli Green Energy (NYSE:YGE) is down to $7.59 (-10.50% just today) for a total loss of -55.58%.

I do not believe the stock will double any time soon for us to break even on it. Goldman Sachs’ change of direction tell me we’re in for a sea change in the attitude toward solar companies in general, beyond the upheaval in the current market.

My original call on Yingli — which we had covered since its IPO back in the Taipan days — was motivated by expectations that Obama will win the election, unleashing a tidal flow of speculative money into “politically correct” investments. A flow triggered by the expectations of a Federal gravy train of subsidies that could make up for the economic shortcomings of solar energy.

That money may still be coming. But overall, I believe recent fascination with solar is a Prosperity Phenomenon. It’s the equivalent of a Levenger catalog (”Tools for Serious Readers”) or an Eagle Scout project marking storm drains in prosperous suburban neighborhoods with “Don’t Dump” stencils. (I did that last Saturday!)

Large-scale adoption of solar technology by consumers represents a huge investment. And currently, it doesn’t look like there will be excess play money lying around anywhere… or credit being extended.

Plus, there’s talk of a huge solar over-supply by 2010.

My recommendation: Solar technology is the new bio-ethanol. Sell while you still get money for your shares.

Source: The Death of Solar? Yet Another Bubble Has Popped!

William says every successful investor needs a China investing strategy, despite the fact that China’s benchmark index, the Shanghai stock index, is down 56% so far this year.

Following Jim Rogers’ bullish comments on China in a recent exclusive interview with Money Morning, Bill gives six reasons to invest in China and five solid China profit plays.

In an exclusive interview with Money Morning, global investing guru Jim Rogers said that giving up on that country now would be like selling all your U.S. stocks at the start of the 1900s – before America created massive wealth by evolving into a world superpower.

“I have never sold any of my Chinese companies,” Rogers said. “You know, selling China in 2008 is like selling America in 1908. Sure, let’s say the market goes down another 40% – so what! You look back over 100 years, you look back from the beauty of 1928, or even 1938 [in the depths of the Great Depression], and there is somebody who bought shares in 1908. He was still a lot better off having not sold in 1908.”

Even if the U.S. economy skids into a recession, China’s long-term growth outlook remains strong – and that’s after nearly 30 years of double-digit growth that country has already logged.

Here are some of the key points – as well as some profit plays – to consider:

First, China remains one of the strongest economies in the world. Even after China reduced its growth outlook, the country remains on track for an economic expansion of better than 9% for the year to come. We aren’t so naïve as to expect a straight path of uninterrupted growth. But neither do we expect a U.S. downturn to squelch the Red Dragon’s long-term growth prospects.

For broad exposure to China’s growth, consider the China Region Opportunity Fund (USCOX), managed by the San Antonio-based U.S. Global Investors Inc. (GROW).

Second, China remains awash in liquidity, with $1.68 trillion in foreign reserves. And much of that excess capital is being focused on the upside, particularly when it comes to boosting disposable income and then building brand awareness for its own products.

And now that liquidity is allowing the country to go on a global shopping spree, enabling its companies and its state-run sovereign wealth funds to pick up such choice assets at bargain prices. One beneficiary of such outside capital: Companies such as MGM Mirage (MGM), which is being positioned as a high-profit play on China.

Third, China’s markets are quickly becoming much “narrower.” Money is being reallocated from highly risky ventures into more-predictable enterprises. That’s an important trend for investors to track, for history shows time and again that these more-predictable ventures fare the best during uncertain, volatility-laced markets. One advantage that these companies have, believe it or not, is that they don’t have to tap into the credit markets at a time when credit is costly, or not available at all. Weaker companies won’t be able to get financing, even if it is available. Consider such potential “New Dragon” companies as online media player SINA Corp. (SINA) or fast-growing advertising play Focus Media Holding Ltd. (ADR: FMCN), for instance. As the economy becomes more “normalized,” consumers will increasingly need such products as insurance, so take a look at China Life Insurance Co. Ltd. (ADR: LFC).

Fourth, many of China’s companies are now reporting real profits. For decades, most Chinese companies operated on the slimmest of margins, with profits that were actually based on taxes or export-incentive “loopholes.” They were kept on life support with an endless stream of bank loans. All of this is being eradicated by Beijing. Money is being taken out of highly risky ventures, or the uncompetitive, state-run enterprises that are ridden with debt. In China, that capital is now being redeployed into the innovative, more-promising ventures that we refer to as the “New Dragons” – many of which are destined to rival the U.S.-based “Global Titans” as the dominant global brands and investor stalwarts of tomorrow. One New Dragon that’s already making a global splash is solar-energy player First Solar Inc. (FSLR). Also consider Huaneng Power International Inc. (ADR: HNP), the domestic China power producer that’s also getting involved in projects outside its home market.

Fifth, the still-weak U.S. greenback will make brand-name imports (both products and services) even more popular in China. And rapidly growing consumer income will give China’s consumers the cash to spend on such one-time luxuries as travel and tourism. One big beneficiary: The Boeing Co. (BA) of the United States, which says that China and other Asian nations will need $340 billion worth of new aircraft over the next two decades.

Sixth, look for companies that generate revenue “from” China, even if they’re not based “in” China. This is a great risk-management strategy: It’s a way for investors to profit from China, while enjoying the investor protections and regulatory oversight of such developed markets as the United States and Europe. The Global Titans are our No. 1 choice here. Many pay a dividend, as well.

If you’re seeking some solid, specific picks, some of the best ones to consider include PepsiCo Inc. (PEP), Diageo PLC (DEO), Yum! Brands Inc. (YUM), McDonald’s Corp. (MCD), The Coca-Cola Co. (KO), and a few others.

The bottom line is this: These days, and forever more, every investor has to have a China investing strategy. And while choosing to sit on the sidelines certainly qualifies as a strategy, remember this: Over the long haul, it’s probably not a profitable plan to follow.

P.S. The first part of this two-part story, Why Every Investor Should Have a China Investment Strategy, appeared in the Aug. 8 issue of Money Morning.

Source: How to Profit From A China Investing Strategy

“By facilitating the growth of one of the solar industry’s leading developers, this investment gives us immediate access to attractive solar markets in Europe and the United States and will form an important part of GE’s broader strategy to become a major player in solar power,” Alex Urquhart, President and CEO of GE Energy Financial Services, said in a statement. “GE has all the right ingredients to succeed in solar: capital, technology, research and ecomagination.”

Ecomagination is GE’s in-house term for its program to help customers meet their energy needs through cleaner technologies such as solar and wind power. The company recently announced that its alternative energy investments had crossed the $4 billion threshold.

Fotowatio owns and operates solar-power installations in Spain, Italy and the United States, which will amount to approximately 960 megawatts when all projects currently under development are completed.

Countries around the world are setting aggressive renewable energy targets in hopes of reducing both environmental damage and overdependence on fossil fuels. The European Union has set a 20% target for that portion of EU energy consumption to come from renewable sources by 2020.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) projects that $45 trillion will be spent on clean technology development over the next 20 years.

And solar power is one of the fastest growing sources of alternative energy, as technological advances make solar panels thinner and more energy-efficient. To get in on the global commitment to alternative energy, here are some investments to consider.

First Solar Inc.’s (FSLR) reliance on low cost thin-film cells has helped the Phoenix-based solar module manufacturer to produce solar cells for a lower cost than its rivals. According to MarketWatch data, the average rating for this stock is “overweight” with a price target of $350. First Solar shares have traded in a range from $74.77 – $317.00 over the past 12 months and closed at $XXX.XX on Friday.

LDK Solar Company Ltd. (LDK) is a manufacturer of multicrystalline solar wafers, used to produce solar cells. This China-based firm has been hard hit this year, with a share price down over 30% year-to-date. But LDK Solar has several lucrative projects in the pipeline that could turn things around as it puts the finishing touches on a brand-new silicon plant with a 1,000-ton production capacity. Another plant with a production capacity of 15,000 tons per year is set to come online some time next year. LDK Solar shares closed at $XX.XX on Friday.

If you prefer the built-in diversification that mutual-fund-type investments offer, consider an exchange-traded fund (ETFs) that focuses on such “clean” technologies as solar and wind power. One of the top ETF names in this category is PowerShares WilderHill Clean Energy Fund (PBW). This ETF has also been battered, but if you have a long-term investment horizon and believe global governments will honor their pledge to clean energy investments, now might be the time to buy.

Source: GE Strengthens Its Commitment to Alternative Energy with a $230 Million Solar Power Investment

Pickens’ Mesa Power LLP yesterday (Thursday) unveiled the first phase of an eventual $10 billion alternative energy project that has the potential to become the world’s largest wind farm.

“You find an oilfield, it peaks and starts declining, and you’ve got to find another one to replace it,” Pickens, who once operated one of the largest independent oil-and-gas production companies in the country, said of the deal. “It can drive you crazy. With wind, there’s no decline curve.”

Mesa Power will purchase 667 wind turbines from General Electric Co. (GE). Each turbine can produce 1.5 megawatts of electricity. The first phase of the project will produce 1,000 megawatts, enough energy to power 300,000 homes. GE will begin delivering the turbines in 2010, and current plans call for the project to start producing power in 2011.

“T. Boone Pickens’ commitment underscores the ability of wind technology to help meet the country’s need for diverse sources of energy,” said Jeffrey R. Immelt, GE’s chairman and CEO. “As America’s demand for energy escalates, it is clear that wind can and will play a bigger part in meeting that need. We’re excited to partner with an energy visionary like T. Boone Pickens to bring our wind technology to the marketplace.”

Ultimately, Mesa Power plans to have enough turbines to produce 4,000 megawatts of energy, the overall project is expected to cost $10 billion and be completed in 2014.

Mesa Power has leased sparsely populated land in the Texas panhandle, where the wind often blows during daylight hours when energy needs are highest. Texas’ Competitive Renewable Energy Zones (CREZ) transmission lines will deliver what Pickens hopes will be “cost effective and reliable electricity generated by renewable energy power projects.”

“We have had a great response to this project,” Pickens said. “We are making Pampa the wind capital of the world. It’s clear that landowners and local officials understand the economic benefits that this renewable energy can bring not only to landowners who are involved with the project, but also in revitalizing an area that has struggled in recent years.”

“Alternative” Energy No Longer Just an Alternative

At a time when oil is costing upwards of $125 a barrel, alternative energy sources are no longer just for the environmentally conscious, but for the cost conscious, as well.

“The development of alternative energy projects, especially renewable resources such as wind power, is critical for the future of the country in the face of declining world oil resources,” Pickens said.

For years, emerging economies such as China have chosen “cheap” over “clean” when it comes to energy sources. But with the cost of traditional fuel sources such as oil and coal skyrocketing, environmentally friendly choices are becoming more appealing.

When it comes to China investments, “the smart money is in the clean money,” says Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald.

And when it comes to alternative energy, wind power isn’t the only option. The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) says that solar power will provide 50% of all new electricity in the United States within eight years, creating tens of thousands of new high-tech jobs, while helping to conserve natural gas and saving American taxpayers billions in energy costs.

And while that estimate might be a bit ambitious, it’s certainly true that solar power use is on the rise, both domestically and abroad.

One of the solar power stars is First Solar Inc. (FSLR), which designs and manufactures solar modules using a proprietary thin-film semiconductor technology. With that know-how, the company’s average cost for making a solar module is among the lowest in the world.

Another up-and-comer is LDK Solar Company Ltd. (LDK), which expects to complete a brand-new silicon plant with a 1,000-ton production capacity this summer. And another plant with a production capacity of 15,000 tons per year is set to come online sometime next year.

If you prefer the built-in diversification that mutual-fund-type investments offer, consider an exchange-traded fund (ETFs) that focuses on such “clean” technologies as solar and wind power. One of the top ETF names is PowerShares WilderHill Clean Energy (PBW).

If you’re the type of investor who prefers cool breezes to sunny skies, you could invest in the makers of wind turbines.

Two of the largest include GE and Siemens AG (ADR: SI). GE just received the $2 billion order from Pickens and expects another $6 billion in orders from the planned 4,000 MW Pampa project alone. And Siemens will supply the turbines for a 500 MW wind farm planned in the United Kingdom.

Source: Former Oilman T. Boone Pickens Makes a $2 Billion Bet on Alternative Wind Energy