And that suggests higher oil and gasoline prices in coming months – perhaps as much as 50% – 70% higher, or more – particularly if a U.S. economic recovery is truly in the offing.

To really see what I’m talking about, let’s start with a close look at consumption. I’m asked about this frequently in my global wanderings, most recently at the Las Vegas Money Show last week.

For months we’ve been hearing about a drop in global demand. It’s a popular story and one that sounds credible: After all, it seems logical to assume that during economic chaos, consumers and businesses alike will rethink their budgets and ratchet back their spending.

For consumers, the continued economic malaise will mean fewer trips to the store, less-ambitious vacations, and car-pooling to school or work . For businesses, the cutbacks by consumers will clearly translate into canceling trips where conference calls will suffice and using lower-cost shipping alternatives for the decreased sales volumes most U.S. companies will experience.

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, oil consumption fell by nearly 50,000 barrels a day throughout 2008. According to the latest figures, the EIA suggests that global oil demand may slump to 83.4 million barrels a day in 2009 – nearly 2.4 million barrels below 2008 consumption levels. On a percentage basis, that’s almost a 3% drop. I have my doubts that we’ll actually see a decline of this magnitude, but if it does occur, it will be the first time ever that consumption has declined for two straight years. That alone is pretty noteworthy in this era of cohesive and powerful global growth.

The reason I have my doubts about such a steep decline in demand is this: While overall consumption is dropping in such developed economies as the United States, Europe and Australia, it’s being at least partially offset by continued growth in China, the Middle East and Latin America. Because the data produced there is less than transparent, I can’t help but think that analysts are underestimating the growth we’ll be seeing in those markets, where consumption is accelerating strongly. And it’s entirely possible that growth in those markets will outstrip any fall here in the developed world.

Even if the growth in the emerging markets doesn’t quite offset the decline in their developed brethren, analysts seem to be forgetting that oil prices are a function of two variables – consumption and production. And it’s the change in production that’s going to catch a lot of people by surprise.

After a run of record high oil prices punctuated by frantic resources development, we’re now seeing the opposite scenario. The long period of lower than anticipated oil prices following oil’s meteoric rise last year means that the entire industry is no longer making the investments needed to sustain production capacity or actual production.

And not many folks recognize this fact.

For instance, direct project investment in drilling may be down as much as 20%, while the number of drill rigs in operation in America alone has dropped by more than 40%. Various estimates from the EIA and private sources suggest that actual U.S. production may fall by as much as 320,000 barrels a day. While the amount is a matter of debate, the fact that production is declining is not.

More than 20% of total U.S. oil production comes from tiny wells located in remote areas that were marginally profitable producers when crude oil was trading at $100 a barrel. With oil currently at about $61 a barrel, those producers are practically worthless now.  So the “mom-and-pop” shops that own them are actually abandoning entire fields and equipment without a moment’s thought.

To be fair, at least part of the drop in demand can be attributed to increased reliance on methanol, ethanol and other types of biofuel, but that’s hard to quantify at the moment because the long period of low oil prices has eroded the economic viability of alternative fuels – at least for now.

The story is much the same with new exploration projects being cancelled left, right and center. The trend is particularly apparent in the Canadian oil sands that were everybody’s fancy only 24 months ago. Now we’re seeing Royal Dutch Shell PLC (NYSE ADR: RDS.A, RDS.B), StatoilHydro ASA (NYSE ADR: STO) and Petro-Canada USA (NYSE: PCZ) each backing away from multi-million dollar investments that were to bring online an estimated 500,000 barrels a day.

Russian, Saudi and Mexican producers are reporting the biggest production drops seen in 50 years. Even Venezuelan leader President Hugo Chavez – the perennial motor mouth and longtime U.S. critic – is eating crow. He’s begrudgingly invited (read that to mean “is begging”) the oil companies whose assets he nationalized only a year ago to “come back” into the market.

He has no choice. Venezuela’s oil production is already below its 1997 levels, and many analysts say that output could fall even more since Chavez has done such a thorough job of alienating the big foreign oil companies that actually possess the technology needed to extract crude oil from that country’s hard-to-reach reserves.

Chavez’s Chavez’s government seized the assets of 60 foreign and domestic oil service companies after conflict erupted over nearly $14 billion in debt owed by the country’s state-owned energy company, Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA). PDVSA accumulated the debt as oil prices took a dramatic slide from over $147 a barrel last July to less than $35 a barrel in February.

Then there’s simple shrinkage. This is an oil industry term for declining output. The EIA recently released data suggesting that production at more than 800 oil fields around the world is going to decline by about 9.1%. It doesn’t matter whether the decline is prompted by depletion, war, or simple neglect. The fact is that this shrinkage will take an estimated 7.6 million barrels per day out of the system.

I could go on but I think you get the picture.

Now imagine what could happen to oil-and-gasoline prices when normalized demand resumes. Not only will there be less oil in storage, but virtually the entire industry – exploration, production, refining and sales – is going to be caught sitting on its heels when the world needs it to be zooming along in high gear. And that means the companies that make up this industry will have to ramp up again to meet the newly increased consumption demands.

This whole process could take two years – or even longer – to play out.

As for prices, history is replete with examples of what happens when there are major shortages of key commodities.

In the Energy Crisis of 1973-74, for example, I can still remember the numbingly long gas lines and waiting in the car for hours to get a fill-up. My father and grandfather vividly remember that prices quadrupled in a matter of months. I’m sure you do, too.

Only a few years later, in 1979, we got another oil shock when prices quadrupled again. Because it was coupled with stagnant economic growth and virulent inflation (stagflation), this period was an economic disaster for the United States.

For those who had learned from the earlier crisis, however, it was a mondo- profit opportunity.

The same can be said for 2007-2008, when the huge spike in oil prices that I predicted contributed to the bear market in stocks, tight credit and recessionary conditions that led to the current malaise that continues to grip the U.S. economy. As much as anything else, high oil prices contributed to the carnage we’ve seen in the auto-making and airline industries, and to the financial crisis that started here before spanning the globe.

Which brings us full circle.

Many investors will refuse to believe we’ve arrived at this new energy nexus, especially given all the hype we’ve seen surrounding alternative fuels, hybrid vehicles and the new “green” mentality that’s taken hold here in this country. If you listen to some of the real believers, they’ll tell you that we could be living in a petroleum-free Nirvana – as early as tomorrow.

While I personally would like that, too, it’s a misleading argument if for no other reason than there are millions of consumer items we use – from plastic bags to makeup – still created using petroleum. And there are still more than 60,000 manufacturing processes that depend on petroleum, and even the most aggressive estimates suggest that it will take the world decades to shift away from them.

We’re in much the same situation when it comes to hybrid vehicles. There isn’t a mass-produced electric vehicle available today that could offset the coming rise in recovery-driven demand for oil and gasoline. There’s a strong effort underway, but I’m not aware of a single company ready to field the solution in cost-affordable quantities by 2010 – which is when most analysts say a recovering economy will stoke demand for oil.

Of course, U.S. President Barack Obama’s much-lauded efficiency and greenhouse-gas-standards mandate will help significantly, but that’s like bolting the barn door after the horses have run for the fields. The irony of watching auto executives “applaud” his press conference was almost too much to watch with a straight face. But that’s a story for another time.

The bottom line is this: Our society will be highly dependent on oil for many years to come and investors should plan accordingly.

If governments around the world really want to get serious, they could collectively work to eliminate the fuel subsidies that are part of the price paid for gasoline in Asia or sugarcane ethanol in Brazil. We could also stop our own energy pork barreling. But given the complete lack of transparency that surrounds this issue – not to mention the influence wielded by vested industry interests, and the scores of well-paid lobbyists that patrol the halls of power in our nation’s capital – I don’t think we’ll see any big changes anytime soon.

So I’m left with one inescapable conclusion, at least in the intermediate term. Every investor needs to have at least some sort of energy strategy – preferably one that includes a range of drillers, producers and suppliers to cover the spectrum from wellhead to consumer.

That way, we can profit from an increase in energy prices that we can only hope rise fast enough to jump-start the oil industry’s production arm but not so fast that it snuffs out the badly needed economic recovery.

Editor’s Note: Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald is the editor of the new Geiger Index trading service. As the whipsaw trading patterns investors have endured this year have shown, the ongoing global financial crisis has changed the investment game forever. Uncertainty is now the norm and that new reality alone has created a whole set of new rules that will help determine who profits and who loses. Investors who ignore this “New Reality”will struggle, and will find their financial forays to be frustrating and unrewarding. But investors who embrace this change will not only survive – they will thrive. With the Geiger Index, Fitz-Gerald has already isolated these new rules and has unlocked the key to what he refers to as “Golden Age of Wealth Creation” The Geiger Index system allows Fitz-Gerald to predict the price movements of broad indexes, or of individual stocks, with a high degree of certainty. And it’s particularly well suited to the kind of market we’re all facing right now. Check out our latest report on these new rules, and on this new market environment.

Source: With Oil Prices Poised to Jump as Much as 70%, Every Investor Needs an Energy Strategy

Voicing interventionist sentiments, James Williams, of WTRG Economics, said that, “We had another week of uncertainty, with oil trading more as a currency and inflation hedge than based upon the fundamentals … This will continue to be the case as long as the long-only index funds are allowed free rein in the futures market.”

On the supply side, said it expects global oil demand to grow to 86.88 million barrels per day for 2008, down from the estimate of 86.95 million it forecast in its May report.

OPEC knows that their “ability to increase production over the entire organization is severely limited, if possible at all, so by backing down their demand outlook, they have no reason to have to get into the debate on why they shouldn’t be increasing their supply,” said Neal Ryan, of Ryan Oil & Gas Partners.

Source: Crude Backs Down

May, being a hard act to follow
God created June…

Peak this…peak that…

This just in from a Dear Reader, throwing our own words back in our face:

“‘Now, it appears that the gains from mechanization, bioengineering, chemistry and land clearing may have reached their limits. We may soon reach Peak Food’

“Now, let me ask: Has the DR morphed into a Marxist newsletter or something?”

Another reader was more flattering…

“Your writing reminds me of H.L. Mencken, after he had his stroke. But seriously, the one thing that marks human history…above all else…is the constant rise in population and the constantly improving technology to support it. I don’t see any reason why that basic theme should change. Peak Food? Don’t trouble yourself about it…”

Don’t worry about us, dear readers…we have not lost a wink of sleep to the peaks…neither Peak Oil nor Peak Food bothers us. No, it is not the peaks that disturb our sleep…it’s the valleys.

As our Dear Reader points out, we’ve faced peaks before. Many of them. Somehow we’ve made it over them – and then scooted down the other side. That’s how history works – like topography. Peaks, valleys, and broad, fertile plains. What more could you ask for?

We’ll return to the Peaks in a moment…but first let us look around…and get the lay of the land.

Oil sold off last week…and ended at $127. Gold rallied on Friday, but still ended the week considerably down.

Last week, we thought we saw an important break in the terrain. Speculators were betting that the Fed would reverse course and begin raising interest rates. This boosted the dollar, whacked gold, and sent the bond market tumbling. Lower bond prices come with higher yields; soon, the economy begins to sulk as if it had been punished.

“US mortgage rates leap ahead as investors bet on move from Fed,” is the headline in the Financial Times this morning. Thirty-year fixed-rate mortgages rose above 6% for the first time in nearly three months; jumbo mortgage money cost 7.21%. Ten-year notes, meanwhile, fell to yield more than 4%.

Ain’t markets wonderful, dear reader? All that hard work that the feds have been doing – all designed to keep rates low so that people would borrow more money; it can all be undone by a day’s trading!

“The surge in mortgage rates will make it more expensive to buy homes and less likely that existing homeowners will be able to refinance mortgages. That in turn, is likely to dampen hopes of an early recovery in the US housing market,” explained the FT .

What went wrong?

Ah…remember the “crude oil vigilantes?”

When the Fed began cutting rates last September, the price of oil shot up. High oil prices are now oozing into the entire economy…greasing up prices for everything from cucumbers to diapers. And the trends that held consumer prices down for so long are shoving them in the other direction. Labor costs were forced down, for example, as hundreds of millions of Asians entered the worldwide job market. But now those laborers are cooking with gas…and driving automobiles…and eating regular meals – competing with Americans for food and energy, and driving up prices even as the U.S. economy goes into a slump.

Here is the latest from the Associated Press :

“Indonesians are staging protests against shrinking gasoline subsidies in a nation where nearly half the population of 235 million lives on less than $2 a day. And there are now 887 million vehicles in the world, up from 553 million vehicles just 15 years ago, and on track to nearly double to a billion by 2012, according to London-based consultancy Global Insight.

“So as oil prices have soared, average U.S. [gasoline] prices have gone up 144 percent in the past five years – from $1.67 in May 2003 to $4.02 a gallon this month, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Over the same period, gas prices in France went up 117 percent to $9.66 a gallon.

“Proposals by U.S. presidential candidates John McCain and Hillary Clinton to suspend federal gas taxes this summer would lower the price tag – but have little effect on the underlying oil price. French President Nicholas Sarkozy has urged the EU to cut value-added tax on fuel.

“French fishermen and farmers, who need fuel for their trawlers and tractors, say their livelihoods are threatened by soaring prices and have blocked oil terminals around France and shipping traffic on the English Channel to demand government help. Italian, Portuguese and Spanish fisherman joined them and went on strike Friday. British and Bulgarian truckers are staging fuel protests, too.

“Turkey faces similar problems – and even higher prices – $11.29 a gallon, which for a full tank in a midsize car can reach nearly $200, enough for a domestic plane ticket.”

This is just the tip of the iceberg…keep reading here .

For almost five decades, Indonesia held a unique position as the only Asian member of the OPEC oil-exporters’ cartel. When it joined OPEC in 1962, it was Southeast Asia’s undisputed energy giant. But yesterday marked the end of an era for the country. Indonesia has formally withdrawn from the oil cartel.

You see, the country’s oil production hit a peak in 1976. And In the early 90’s it was still producing about 1.7 million barrels per day. But ageing oil fields and a lack of investment has seen falling production since 1995. The country now produces about 800,000 barrels per day and it’s been a net oil importer since 2005. Its days in OPEC were obviously numbered.

It’s big news in the oil industry, but I think that the country’s withdrawal from OPEC is really a bit of a non-event — at least from an investor’s point of view. Indonesia is still a major energy exporter. The country is the world’s biggest exporter of thermal coal, which is widely used in the power sector. It is the world’s second biggest exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG) after the Gulf state of Qatar. And it has recently overtaken Malaysia as the world’s biggest producer of palm oil as well.

Global oil demand is expected to increase by 1.03 million barrels per day this year. And about 70 per cent of that additional demand is going to come from Asia. But it’s not just oil. Asia’s growing economies are fuelling demand for just about all forms of energy. And Indonesia is well placed to profit from it.

Coal is gold…

The country is sitting on about 90.5 billion tons of coal. And demand for the stuff is surging. In fact, Indonesian companies are now selling coal to Japanese buyers at double last year’s prices. So, investors have been flooding into the sector. Indonesia’s biggest coal miner, Bumi Resources, has seen its share price soar by about 431 per cent in the last year. Its market cap is now $16.4bn

Now the country’s second and third biggest coal miners are planning on floating on the markets as well. Number two producer, Adaro Energy, is planning a Rp12,000 billion ($1.3bn), public offering. That will make it the biggest IPO in Indonesia’s history. And it’s going to be the world’s 8th biggest IPO this year.

Adaro has already pulled in top international investors. 64% of the company is controlled by two Indonesian strategic investors. But 36 per cent of the shares are owned by major global investors, including Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation.

And demand for the IPO has been huge. In March, the company announced that it planned to raise $500 million. Then, earlier this month, they raised that to about $1 billion…and then $1.3 billion…

The Adarco IPO is scheduled for next month. The country’s second biggest coal miner Indika Inti Energy plans on raising $300 million through selling an 18 per cent stake in an IPO shortly before the Adarco float. Both these IPOs are probably going to do well. Investors and speculators who missed out on Bumi Resources’ rally will probably try to get in early this time… a move I see as being quite sensible.

Bumi Resources is one to watch…

The two new coal IPO’s might take some of the wind out of Bumi’s sails. And if we see that happen, a fantastic buying opportunity will present itself.

Just consider: China is building new coal-fired power plants at a rate of about one per week! And then there is India. Asia’s other giant plans on adding more than 400,000 Megawatts of new capacity by 2030 — and the bulk of that is going to be powered by coal. So, the coal story still has a long way to go. In the months to come there could be moves to be made… and a second chance for anyone who missed out the first time around.

I’ll keep you posted.

Regards

Manraaj Singh
Profit Hunter
Editor

PS If you liked what you read here — you can become one of my regular subscribers and receive all our new Profit Hunter recommendations the moment we make them.

Source: Careful Timing Could Mean Big Profits From The Worlds No.1 Coal Exporter

No sooner had the words “oil at $120 per barrel” left my lips yesterday, Chakib Khelil, President of OPEC, said it could hit $200 and there was little he or his cartel could do about it.

It’s making Americans restless…

A group of senators have just written a letter to President Bush accusing the Saudi’s of slashing oil production by 2 million barrels a day over the last three years, even as the price of oil has skyrocketed.

The Saudis don’t seem too bothered about America’s oil woes. Of course, the U.S. is making OPEC’s job so much easier…

Its interest rate cuts are driving down the value of the dollar and its sabre rattling at Iran is boosting the “risk premium” in the price of oil.

Some analysts have put the value of that premium at up to $40 per barrel.

But the simple fact is…

OPEC won’t raise output… non-OPEC producers can’t

OPEC simply won’t raise output, the non-OPEC producers simply can’t.

Right now, the non-OPEC countries produce about 60% of global oil supply – about 50 million barrels a day. But they’re stuck there. In fact production is falling quickly in some of the biggest of them.

Norway’s output has fallen by 25% from its peak in 2001. British output has slumped by 43% in eight years. In America, the giant Prudhoe Bay field in Alaska has seen output drop by 65% from its peak two decades ago…

And in Mexico, production at the giant Cantarell oil field is collapsing and they haven’t found any new fields to replace it. But Mexico’s economy is growing rapidly. So, domestic consumption is shooting up while production is falling. Mexico’s exports could be wiped-out within five years. That means more sleepless nights for America’s leaders because Mexico is the second-biggest oil exporter to the US.

Then there’s Russia… the biggest contributor to the growth in global energy supplies over the last decade. Output shot up from about 6 million barrels in 1996 to about 10 million barrels per day today. But the Russians say that they’ve hit peak production… so it’s all down hill from here.

Of course, huge chunks of Siberia are still unexplored and there could be lots more oil out there.

But the Russian government has shown a nasty habit of muscling-out Western companies operating in the country to gain more control over its energy resources. So they are reluctant to invest and we probably won’t see any meaningful growth in supplies there for years.

OPEC turns the screws on global oil prices

As they see output falling everywhere, OPEC is steadily turning the screws on global oil prices.

I think it’s almost funny to watch the reactions of politicians everywhere. Someone must have forgotten to tell them that OPEC is a cartel. Its job is to make its members rich, not provide cheap oil to faltering Western economies.

And it must be doing something right… because the petrodollars are really beginning to pile up.

Sovereign wealth funds already control $3.5 trillion in assets – that’s more than the U.K. French or German economies are worth. But that’s nothing compared to what’s still to come…

By 2015, their assets will be worth more than the entire U.S. economy and by 2016 they will overtake the European Union.

Leave China out of that equation and practically all those sovereign wealth funds are being boosted by the rising price of oil.

And the fastest growing funds are based in oil producing countries that don’t figure on most investor’s maps.

In the last five years, Nigeria’s SWF has grown by 291%, Oman’s by 256%. Kazakhstan’s SWF is up 162%; Angola’s by 84%…

How to ride the ‘petrodollar’ bandwagon

Now you can’t invest directly in a sovereign wealth fund, but they’re an excellent way of keeping track of where the money is going today and where the biggest economic booms are happening right now…

The point that I’m trying to drive home here is that high oil prices aren’t going to benefit all the oil producers equally.

The real tide of petrodollars is flowing to the OPEC countries. The big winners are going to be countries like Nigeria and Angola, Venezuela and Bahrain… and we can already see the winners and losers in the new equation.

Here at Profit Hunter we are well placed to benefit from this tide of wealth, which can only increase in the years ahead.

We aren’t directly invested in oil. There are too many unknowns that go into its price. Instead we are focussed on uncovering the investment opportunities being opened up by this dramatic shift in economic power.

And we have no doubt that that shift is going to continue.

We’ve been emphatic that we are now in the era of $100 oil. I doubt that we are ever going to see it go back below that price for a sustained period.

What does all of this mean for us as investors?

Simple – if we can tap into the same pools of capital that are fuelling the growth of these sovereign wealth funds, we are going to be on to very good thing indeed.

You’re very welcome to join us… just follow the links below
Regards,

Manraaj Singh
Editor Profit Hunter