Gold’s best part is still ahead. And this is not just a bull market; this is a fortune maker.

Bill Bonner (The Daily Reckoning, UK):
Yesterday, gold closed at $1,200. Long-term Daily Reckoning sufferers can finally hold their heads up. We bought gold at the beginning of the bull market. New readers, with no gold buried in their back yards, may wonder: is it too late?

Here is a quick answer: no. We’re still a long way from gold’s ultimate destination. Our ‘Trade of the Decade’ was to buy gold on dips and sell stocks on rallies. The idea of that trade was that gold and stocks were going in opposite directions. Stocks were supposed to go down. Gold was supposed to go up. They would meet at some point, we imagined.

But lately they’ve been going in the same direction. Yesterday, for example, stocks rose with gold; the Dow added 126 points.

Which poses a bit of a dilemma. We think stocks are more likely to go down than up. Will gold go down too? Yes, probably.

Does that mean you shouldn’t buy gold here? No, not necessarily. If you’re trading, we’d suggest you wait. Gold is ready for a correction.

But it is usually a mistake to trade in and out during a major bull market. If the trade goes against you, you end up sitting by the sidelines as the market roars forward. You miss the best part.

Gold’s best part is still ahead. And this is not just a bull market; this is a fortune maker. Gold still hasn’t entered the bubble phase. It is just a very strong bull market. Eventually, it will soar… adding $100 in a single day. It will take our breath away. You want to be in it when that happens.

But is $1,200 the best price you can get to enter the gold market? Probably not. But it’s not a bad price. You can wait for a better one; but don’t wait too long.

John Hussman puts the odds of a major market crash sometime in the next 12 months at 80%. If stocks go, gold is likely to go down too. And it could stay down for a long time.

We keep our Crash Alert flag flying… and have a hunch the crash will come sooner rather than later. Day after day, the bubble gets bigger… and the pins get closer. Greece? Britain? The US?

Click here for the rest of Mr. Bonner’s analysis at The Daily Reckoning, UK Edition.

Karim Rahemtulla (Investment U):
Of all the great investments you could have made in 2009, gold is right up there among the best of them.

The price of gold has surged this year, taking gold shares upwards with it. Readers of my Xcelerated Profits Report have rung the register with 45% profits on Goldcorp (NYSE: GG) and a triple-digit winner on Golden Star Resources (NYSE: GSS). We’re also up big on Yamana Gold (NYSE: AUY) at the moment.

All is good, right?

On the surface, perhaps. But not if you believe what the options market is saying…

Yamana Options Signal a Share Price Drop

Using Yamana as an example, the options market is betting that over the next 12 months or so, Yamana may fall from current levels of around $13 back into the single digits again.

Just take a look at the January 2011 $7.50 put options (the right to sell Yamana shares at $7.50), currently trading at $0.70 cents per contract. This means the put buyer thinks Yamana’s price will fall to $6.80 – almost 50% below current levels – in order to be in the money. The $6.80 price is derived from subtracting the price of the option from the strike price ($7.50 minus $0.70 = $6.80). This tale is similar across other gold shares, too.

These put options are expensive relative to Yamana’s share price – the result of gold prices moving sharply in previous weeks and causing the volatility in gold stocks to increase.

As a quick refresher, the price of an option is based on four major factors:

The price of the underlying shares
The options strike price
The time to expiration
The volatility of the underlying shares
Two Ways to Play Gold Prices… But Only One Viable Option

So if you’re a gold investor looking to participate in the market, what can you do to protect your profits, or buy shares at a lower price? Here are two potential ways…

Click here for the rest of Mr. Rahemtulla’s Analysis at Investment U.

(Taipan Publishing Group) – Gold, small caps and the U.S. dollar have had a stable three-way relationship for the better part of the 2009 rally. Now the three could be parting ways.

Dr. Marc Faber is one of the few market wise men whose thoughts are worth pondering. His monthly “Gloom, Boom & Doom Report” is always a good read. He is an active, Asia-based investor with decades of experience, hundreds of millions under management, and many prescient calls under his belt.

Faber has stated firmly and clearly what he thinks of the U.S. dollar. As you might expect, his opinion is not too flattering.

In the long run, Faber assigns the buck a value of “zero.” In the manner of all fiat currencies, America’s scrip is slowly being turned into toilet paper. The present cast of clowns in Washington seems bound and determined to accelerate this process as Wall Street cheers them on.

But that’s the long term, mind you. In the shorter term – i.e. for at least the next quarter or so – Faber is bullish on the buck. So bullish, in fact, that he is now on record as a buyer of $USD.

“As of today, I will be long in dollars,” Faber told Bloomberg last week. (Perhaps he is buying from my colleague Adam Lass, who professed on Thursday his intent to remain short.)

Continue reading Justice Litle on Taipan Daily.

I have to confess that – deep down – this makes me smile. The reason: I know that the real question to ask is “When will gold go on to set new highs?”

So let me cut right to the chase. This breakout run in gold prices will last.

The “Golden Staircase” tells us so.

After bottoming out about $250 an ounce about nine years ago, such key fundamental catalysts as increasing demand, lower supply, inflationary fears and a flight to safety have been driving the price of gold northward.

But gold is like any other financial asset in that prices don’t rise in a straight line – especially if they’re rising a long way. But they follow a clear and discernable pattern.

As asset prices rise, they often initially overshoot. Then they “correct” – fall back a bit. Then they “consolidate,” or trade sideways, usually for a period of six to 18 months, but sometimes for even longer.

It’s this period of sideways trading that creates the horizontal “step” in the “Golden Staircase” – a technical-analysis tool that lets us “see” the foundation for the next step up in the long-term uptrend in the price of gold.

The formation of the newest “step” in the staircase was started in mid-2007. That’s when the $1,000 price level was first breached. On Tuesday, Sept. 8, when gold prices eclipsed that key barrier on Tuesday, Sept. 8, it was the fifth time they’d attempted to do so.

Each of these attempts has helped define $1,000 as a ceiling.  But in a “Golden Staircase,” the ceiling eventually becomes a new floor.  So once the $1,000 price point is eclipsed in a decisive manner, it will become a key “support level” for gold prices.

You can also think of it as the top surface of a new step.

And that’s precisely the juncture where gold finds itself right now. [Editor's Note: Please see accompanying graphic: "Gold 'Steps' Toward New Highs"].

From a technical standpoint, the outlook for gold is bright, indeed. But the fundamental picture is even more bullish.

Barrick’s Bullish ‘Bought Deal’

Now, I realize it was probably pure coincidence that the world’s largest gold miner, Barrick Gold Corp. (NYSE: ABX), announced it would raise $4 billion on the same day gold flirted with $1,000.  But the conspiracy theorist in me likes to believe otherwise.

For Barrick Chief Executive Officer Aaron W. Regent, this so-called “bought deal” was a conscious strategic move. Barrick has a reputation for wisely using hedges to its own advantage.  The strategy served the company well in its copper-production business. And when gold prices fell in the late 1990s, Barrick turned to this strategy again – and again benefited nicely.

Recently, however, Barrick’s bankers have been coaxing the company’s leaders to ditch the hedges in order. The reason: In an environment of rising gold prices, hedged bets dampen profits. Removing those hedges, by contrast, elevates profits. But it also elevates the company’s risk.

So when a company such as Barrick makes a strategic decision to raise equity capital in order to close a large portion of its infamous hedge-book, that’s a highly bullish sign for gold prices.

When Central Bankers Become Gold Buyers

A third Central Bank gold agreement has recently been ratified. And, interestingly, it’s a weaker version of its two predecessors.

New limits will allow for only 400 metric tons to be sold annually, down from 500 metric tons in the previous deal.  The deal is bullish on its face. And, even better, this more to it than meets the eye.

You see, the last 10 years of these agreements have seen some 4,000 metric tons unloaded into the market.  And even into the face of the $80-billion-selling headwind these divestitures created, gold has managed to stage a rise from $250 an ounce to the current $1,000.

And story gets better, still: According to the World Gold Council, the world’s central banks became overall net buyers of gold as of this year’s second quarter – the first time that’s happened since 2000.

China Goes For the Gold

In the post-financial crisis global economy, China is quickly becoming the proverbial “800-pound gorilla” – the player that has to be courted, but that can’t be tamed.

And now, in a signature move, China has decided to take a remarkable step, choosing to take control of its own gold.

Just this month, in fact, Hong Kong announced that it would bring all its gold bullion back home, recalling the reserves from depositories in London. Hong Kong has just completed construction of a high-security depository at the city’s Chek Lap Kok Airport (Hong Kong International Airport), and plans to market the facility as a safe storage option to other Asian central banks, commodity exchanges, precious metals refiners, commercial banks, and exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

This development can (and will) be spun in all sorts of ways, but what it really means is that China has lost confidence in the West.  After last fall’s near-meltdown of the global financial system – a financial cataclysm due almost entirely to major missteps by Western economic powers – China’s Beijing-based leaders want much greater control over its own assets.

And who can blame them?

China’s Ravenous Gold Appetite

At more than $2.3 trillion and counting, China’s foreign currency reserves have become the stuff of legend in recent years. But here’s the rest of that story, with apologies to the late Paul Harvey: According to a late August Financial Times report, “Beijing recently revealed that it had been secretly buying gold for years in order to diversify its foreign reserves, and has almost doubled its bullion holdings.”

China’s official gold reserves now run 1,054 metric tons. That means its holdings have doubled in just six years.

And when you consider the risk China faces on its $2.3 trillion in paper (foreign currency) reserves – much of them U.S. dollar denominated – it’s understandable that China has been ardently seeking shelter.  In a late-July special report for Money Morning called “The Three Triggers of the Global Gold Bubble,” I told readers:

“All it would take is a loss of faith in the greenback. It’s important to understand that dollars are nothing more than paper and ink, backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.  In a year in which the budget deficit could easily top $2 trillion, this does not reassure me.

The dollar holds its value only as long as the greenback’s holders maintain their faith in the currency. The moment people decide they don’t want your dollars, they become worthless, or at least worth much less.  In that case, it will take a lot more dollars today to buy the same thing you bought with many fewer dollars only yesterday.”

For China, this is a very real concern. Especially when it comes to the Beijing’s concerns about the loose-credit stance of the U.S. Federal Reserve. China’s Cheng Siwei, former vice chairman of the Standing Committee of the Chinese Communist Party, recently told Great Britain’s Telegraph newspaper that “If [the Fed] keep[s] printing money to buy bonds, it will lead to inflation, and after a year or two, the dollar will fall hard. Most of our [Chinese] foreign reserves are in U.S. bonds and this is very difficult to change, so we will diversify incremental reserves into euros, yen and other currencies.”

In an exciting addendum, Siwei noted that while gold is solid alternative, “when we buy, the price goes up. We have to do it carefully so as not to stimulate the markets.”

This statement tells us a lot. For instance, there’s definitely an upward price bias contained within gold’s recent price consolidation. And don’t expect gold’s price “floor” to fall too far below the $1,000-an-ounce level: China will almost certainly step in to scoop up all it can.

Meanwhile, it seems that China’s populace is catching on to the ideas of its central government.  In the just-mentioned FT article, the newspaper said “the rising tide of wealth among middle-class Chinese has made China the second-largest gold jewelery market in the world since 2007, behind only India.”  The article goes on to say “Total gold demand in China last year was nearly 400 [metric tons], up by 21% from 2007.”

The lesson here is clear: China’s growing appetite for gold is a powerful trend that will benefit gold investors for years – even decades – to come.

Warning: The IMF Is Now The World’s Central Bank

This fundamental bullish sign for gold is perhaps also the most ominous for the world’s financial well-being.

In an August maneuver that somehow stayed off the radar screens of most global investors, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Board of Governors “voted” to create new “money” in the form of Special Drawing Rights, or SDRs.

As Money Morning told readers back in April, SDRs have been a unit of account used by the IMF since 1967, and denominated in a basket of currencies, including the dollar, pound, yen, and euro.

But now they’ve become a convertible asset.  China, Russia, and Brazil will begin purchasing SDR bonds later this year, with China’s share starting at a whopping $50 billion.

As Bloomberg News reported, “the allocation … will not increase the fund’s pool of money available for lending [but] will provide members with an additional method to obtain hard currencies.”

And that’s scary, because the implications are enormous.

The IMF has become the world’s central bank.

The IMF can create SDR debt instruments out of thin air, without having hard assets to back them.  The IMF’s own Web site explains the basic process, noting that “SDR allocations provide each member with a costless asset.”

Sorry, but I have to ask.  What in the world is a “costless asset?” How can you “create” an asset that has no cost to either produce or acquire? And if it costs nothing to create, how can it have any real value?

It’s outrageous. And it would even be comical – laughable, even – if the implications weren’t so dangerous.

The IMF no longer has to depend on borrowing – much less on contributed assets – to increase the funds it has available to lend.

So a new international fiat currency has just been created and added to the long list of national fiat currencies already in use.  Like most of its brethren, this “currency too an this one, too, can be expanded at will by a handful of un-elected officials. And, as one writer recently stated, “hyper-inflation is the terminal stage of any fiat currency.”

Consider yourselves forewarned. Worldwide inflation is now a bigger threat than ever. Expect the IMF to embark on its own monetary printing spree. A tidal wave of inflation could be headed our way.

Folks, this is going to get ugly.

The Next Bubble?

I have said in the past, that gold could very well be the next bubble.

Now, it seems, that idea is gaining acceptance.

In a recent interview with Canada’s BNN (Business News Network), Canada’s serious business program, Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at Standard & Poor’s Equity Research (NYSE: MHP), said that “if we end up with concerns about the U.S. dollar, we could probably end up with a bubble in gold prices.”

I rest my case.

How to Play Your ‘Golden’ Opportunity

So what can you do to protect yourself?  Well, it seems that even former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan knew the answer to that question.  In May 1999, while testifying before the U.S. House Banking Committee, Greenspan actually said that “gold will always remain the ultimate form of payment in the world.”

That’s one piece of Greenspan-given advice that I believe investors should take.

As the price of gold advances, gold-miners will be the “go to” stocks to play. They will benefit from leverage as the yellow metal advances in price.

To measure the health of gold stocks, an often-used proxy is the Amex Gold Bugs Index (HUI), a weighted benchmark composed of 15 of the world’s largest gold-and-silver mining companies. However, the HUI only includes those companies who don’t hedge their gold production beyond 1.5 years. That was done on purpose. The index was designed to provide significant exposure to near-term movements in gold prices. In an environment of rising gold prices, these stocks tend to be much more profitable.

To then gauge whether gold stocks are a relative bargain, we look to the HUI-to-gold  relationship.  By dividing the HUI “price” by the price of gold (HUI/gold price), we get a ratio that’s a very useful value indicator.

From mid-2003 until mid-2008, this ratio held around the 0.50 range, meaning the HUI bought about 0.50 ounces of gold.

In last fall’s stock panic, we saw this relationship insanely stretched to 0.20.  In late October 2008, the HUI only bought 0.20 ounces of gold.  That was totally irrational and unsustainable.

Gold stocks were trading at levels not seen in nearly two decades.  Extremes like this simply cannot last.

Today, we’ve seen that gap close as I had predicted in January.  To see how the HUI-to-gold relationship looks now, check out the graphic below.

This chart provides a ratio that tells us the “buying power” that gold stocks have to buy gold. The ratio had improved from the 0.20 ratio of last fall and was recently as 0.42. Expect that to continue to shift toward the 0.50 level. In fact, it will most likely overshoot, running up to 0.65, before settling back to the historical norm in the 0.50 neighborhood.

The message here is that spectacular gains are still in store for gold and silver stocks.

The biggest bang-for-buck still lies with the junior gold sector.  The best proxy for this is the S&P/TSX Venture Composite Index (CDNX), otherwise known as the Toronto Venture Exchange. It consists of about 75% resource stocks.

The CDNX has been steadily carving new highs almost uninterrupted since March, now posting a whopping 80% gain since its December 2008 low.  That’s an impressive performance. Remember, this is an index.

The players in this sector promising the best returns are the junior gold-and-silver companies either already producing, or with near-term production.

In the next 12 months, some will likely throw off returns of in the multiple hundreds of a percent, or even multiple thousands of a percent. Major miners really need them to replace depleted production and to grow their reserves. So many will be takeover candidates.

And with gold breaking and sustaining the $1,000 barrier, junior gold and silver miners are the place to be for explosive returns.  Just hold onto your hat.

Source: The ‘Golden Staircase’ Points to Record Prices for Gold

But sometimes, we make exceptions – especially when their over-zealous attitude causes a stock to blast higher and hand us triple-digit gains.

I remember one such occurrence in particular with a high-tech company that we own in our Xclerated Profits Report portfolio. Thanks to some giddy CNBC analysts pumping up the price, the stock surged from $6 to $20 and we took half our position off the table for a gain of more than 100%.

The small-cap stock has suffered along with the broader market, but there’s no doubt that its business is viable. It’s leading the way in the field of touch screen and force-feedback technology – otherwise known as “haptics.” In short, this simplifies and enhances human interaction with technology in a variety of ways.

Cellphones… Games… Cars… Healthcare… This Technology is Everywhere

You’ve probably used the company’s tactile feedback technology and don’t even know it.

• For example, its technology is what causes cellphones to vibrate when they ring, or you get a message. And the company has licensed the technology to major firms like Nokia (NYSE:NOK), Samsung, Motorola (NYSE:MOT), and LG.
• It’s also present in video games, which gives gamers a more interactive, realistic experience, as the action on the screen is “forced” back into the controller.
• Elsewhere, it’s used in the auto industry in dashboard instruments, the casino industry in gaming machines, and the medical industry, in helping to train surgeons and doctors by replicating the behavior of the human body.

The company holds hundreds of patents and it recently signed a deal with a major chip company, a move that an influential analyst called a “game changer.”

In short, we spotted the vast potential well before Wall Street and we’re looking for another triple-digit win on the stock. And if that happens, we’ll adopt the same practice that we always do – one that you should use in your own investing…

The Name of the Game is Profits

We have a hard and fast rule at the Xcelerated Profits Report: We don’t discriminate when it comes to profits. That means if we have a winner of 100%-plus, we take our money off the table. This is true for stocks or options.

We did this last week when we sold half our shares in the gold company Golden Star Resources (NYSE: GSS) for a cool 103% gain in just a couple of months. But what makes this trade even sweeter is that we bought the shares using the proceeds from call options that we sold on another gold stock we’ve owned for a while – Yamana Gold (NYSE: AUY).

Come options expiration in January, if Yamana is trading above $6.75 per share or thereabouts (it’s currently close to $11), we’ll have essentially bought the shares of GSS for nothing.

And speaking of gold, I’ve made another play in the upcoming October Xcelerated Profits Report issue, due out at the end of this week. But it’s a play with a twist – we’re taking a “show me” stance on gold prices, arguing that gold is either going to soar or plunge from current levels. What’s more, we’ll make it do so for about $3. If you’re looking for exposure to gold, or to hedge against a price drop, you don’t want to miss it.

The bottom line is that we don’t just make picks. We take our ideas and then figure out how to turn them into “xcelerated” profits by using straightforward investment strategies that many other investors don’t know about. We teach, then we trade.

Good investing,

Karim Rahemtulla

Source: How to Turn Ordinary Profits into ‘Xcelerated’ Profits

This issue is entirely in the contrarian spirit of playing devil’s advocate. So put your pitchforks down. Take a deep breath. There is plenty of space to poke holes in (or rant) about our thesis by writing to notes@todaysfinancialnews.com

So here it goes. The four reasons you shouldn’t buy gold today…

Reason 1: Did you know that the seventh largest holder of gold in the world is not a country, but an exchange traded fund? Yes, gold ETF SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has amassed the seventh largest gold reserve in the world. This fund holds more gold than China, Switzerland, Japan, the United Kingdom or the European Central Bank.

So why does this matter? Because should big investors (hedge funds, pension funds) who hold this fund (and many due), decide to dump their shares or are forced to liquidate their holdings because of investor redemptions, who will buy up the excess slack? This excess supply would surely drive the price of gold down making for some unhappy gold bugs.

Reason 2: Gold is overbought at today’s price level. When anything becomes overbought quickly, as gold has in recent months, it has a habit of correcting just as quickly. According to Bob Prechter, CEO of Elliot Wave International, the precious metals are “heavily overbought” and the “path of least resistance” will be to the downside for many months. “[Gold's] going to go much further [down] than people think.”

While gold stocks have recently pushed their 200 and 50 day moving averages higher, which is a bullish indicator, the threat that speculators are leading the way is ever present. And if the current recession takes a double dip, which we think is highly possibly (and so does Nouriel Roubini), investors around the world will flee to the dollar again. When the dollar gets propped up, gold falls. And when it starts to fall, you can bet these speculators will be abandoning ship just as fast as they boarded. This could leave you, dear reader, with a sinking boatload of gold in the middle of the vast and hopeless ocean.

Reason 3: More inflation hedges are available today. In the past, gold served as the best inflation hedge out there. In the 1970s when inflation started taking off, so did gold. People piled into the precious metal at rates never before seen, driving the price up to historic highs.

Fast forward to today, and you have a much different investing environment. Gold’s monopoly as the only inflation hedge is over. Now, investors have a wealth of options such as currency ETFs, TIPS, short US Treasury ETFs, other baskets of commodities, and stock in companies that can raise prices on pace with inflation. While none of these vehicles is the perfect inflation hedge, each attracts money away from gold. And the less demand for gold, the less upward price pressure there will be.

Reason 4: The run up in gold is based on fear, not on increased demand. Right now, owning gold is a “fear trade.” The price of gold is not up because people are buying more jewelry or Indian saris. It’s up because people are scared of hyperinflation taking over, the mountain of debt crushing the US, and the fiat money system collapsing. But what if Chairman Ben, and all his merry henchmen, are actually doing the right thing? While it is hard to say this with a straight face, what if everything returns to normal and we experience a nice V-shaped recovery? Or, more plausibly, what if deflation wins the day? Both these scenarios will have serious downward consequences on the price of gold.

So, dear readers, what do you think? Are any of these scenarios possible? Write to us at info@contrarianprofits.com

There is a buzz in the commodities markets this week. Just about anything that can be pulled from the ground is surging in value. Everything, that is, but natural gas.

Most notably, gold is just about ready to reach over the critical $1,000 level, proving that investors are looking for safety. Even without a hint of inflation, the precious metal has surged by over 5% so far this week.

The quick run means the world’s gold miners are surging in value. The more leverage packed into their balance sheets, the higher their prices are going to go.

So far, Yumana Gold (NYSE:AUY) is up by nearly 20% this week, while AngloGold Ashanti (NYSE:AU) is up by over 15%.

It is a similar situation for the silver industry. As investors search for tangible value, the silver industry is taking its investors on a wild ride.

One of the more popular ways of playing the trend, the iShares Silver Trust ETF (NYSE:SLV) was up by as much as 5%, taking the week’s gains into double-digit territory.

TFN Strategic Trader subscribers love the action. Our call options are worth 66% more this afternoon than they were this morning.

The juicy story

Now, I realize you come to TFN sight looking for more than the usual take on the day’s news. Fortunately, our friends over in Russia are creating more than enough action to feed our appetite for story material.

As if the government-centric action unfolding around the Chinese commodity market was not enough to prove my prediction and profit potential of the “Commodities Carry Trade,” the Russian government is stepping into the ring to create some action on its own.

Unable to secure a firm economic future through normal economic means, Putin is “calling” for the country’s banks to start buying Mechel’s (NYSE:MTL) debt. There are also rumors of strong tax breaks heading towards the large Russian miner.

Not only is this yet another wrinkle in my Commodity Carry Trade theory, it helps prove that the effort truly is becoming a global phenomenon.

With their economies weak and the world’s banking industry even weaker, governments are quickly turning to the commodities market for their financial security.

Why invest in paper backed by a desperate government when you can invest in a commodity the world will need no matter what happens in the coming years?

No questioning the profit potential

While there are lots of facets affecting this trade, one thing that is certain is it will be extremely bullish for the commodities market.

We are seeing a mere glimpse of things to come.

Once demand surpassed production… stand back. Prices will soar.

I have a fantastic way to take advantage of this situation, but I absolutely cannot give it away to a wide audience.

Its value was up by nearly 50% today with a trading volume of just 287 trades. Imagine what would happen if thousands of eager investors suddenly jumped in.

If you want me to email you with the trade to make, just click here.

Finally, just to prove there is an exception to every rule, natural gas prices are hitting yet another new low today, dropping the to a paltry $2.50 per million BTUs.

Could it be that foreign investors want nothing to do with an American-based economy? Or is the bearish action a result of the growing inventory glut across the globe?

Now that some of the world’s most powerful governments are getting in on the action, the commodity trade is not going anywhere anytime soon.

This is exciting stuff that is going to drastically change the commodities industry. The situation has profit opportunity written all over it.

I say we take advantage of it.

Source: Russia’s Maneuvering Boosts the Commodities Market

Here’s how…

In this case, I’m assuming that you’re short on Yamana and are trying to manage the position in order to not take a big loss in case it moves against you.

The way to do this would be to buy out-of-the money call options to protect you against any sharp moves up. This is like insurance. You’ll lose a little bit of money, but your downside will be capped once the option goes in-the-money.

The problem here is that if Yamana trades sideways, you’ll lose on the call option and would have to buy more as each one expires. The way around this would be to buy a LEAP call option, but it will be more expensive and eat away at your potential profits.

But what if you want to “go deep?”

Buying Short-Term Options Is A Sucker’s Bet

Here’s another question:

“Please explain the benefits of buying deep-in-the-money options.”

The buyer stands a lesser chance of benefiting than the seller, since the underlying shares must rise in order for the buyer to make money.

On the other hand, the seller can either have Yamana stay at the same price, move up, or move down to make money. Just as long as it’s not by more than his cost.

So what prompts buyers to buy options? Simple… they’re gambling and wish to spend a little bit of money, as opposed to buying the shares. They’re betting on a strong move up, but will unfortunately lose out 70% to 80% of the time. That’s why we don’t buy short-term options. Because doing so is basically saying that we can predict where Yamana will be by expiration in a few weeks or months.

What To Do When Your Options Expire

Finally, here’s another question – a two-parter:

Part 1: Whenever I read about covered calls strategies, there never seem to be much information of what to do after expiration. For example, if the shares get called away or increase in share price, do we buy the same shares again? And do we still sell deep-in-the-money calls then?

It depends on your goals. For us, when we’re using the deep in the money strategy, the objective IS to get called away every time since we are looking to own the shares at lower levels. However, if you’re looking to own the shares and continuously sell calls, then you would buy back the calls the day before expiration, taking advantage of all the premium you have captured from the expiration of time value and volatility. Then you would sell another option with either a higher strike and further out. This is called “rolling” your trade.

Part 2: If the shares don’t get called away, due to a drop in the share price, do we sell covered calls again, except at a lower strike price in order to get a good premium? Or do we sell out-the-money calls now (but the premium is lower).

With the strategy we use, we always try to sell options at the same strike price. So if the shares are lower than the strike price and we hold on to them, we’d then sell options at the same strike price and lower our cost even more. Our goal is to own the shares for zero or negative cost.

If you want to go out-of-the-money, you’re now engaging in a pure long strategy, which is not the goal of deep-in-the-money investing. The worst case is that the shares fall well below the strike and your cost. In this case you can either book the loss, or if you’re investing in a very good company, you just hold the shares until they recover. This happens about 20% to 25% of the time.

This is also the reason why you should only invest in companies that you truly do want to own… because sometimes you’ll end up owning them.

Good investing,

Karim Rahemtulla

Source: Why You Shouldn’t Buy Short-Term Options

The deflationist view, which makes some compelling and elegant arguments, maintains that the credit losses in the U.S. financial system far surpass the size of the government’s monetary and fiscal stimulus. All those trillions in bad loans – plus the yanking of credit from consumers and businesses – overwhelm new money creation. The Fed, in other words, is trying to fill a swimming pool with a Dixie cup. This might take a while.

Therefore, this reasoning goes, the greater risk is that asset prices continue to fall. This is the classic debt-deflation point of view. I don’t dismiss these arguments lightly. I’ve spent some time going over the arguments of some of deflation’s most persuasive and sophisticated advocates – like the successful Treasury bond investor, Van Hoisington and the insightful economist, David Rosenberg.

Still, I think the endgame is for inflation — which is when paper currencies buy less. Given the choice of holding U.S. dollars or real assets (such as gold or iron ore or land), I’ll take real assets.

Over the weekend, Thomas Donlan at Barron’s presented a good analogy for it all. He asked what you would rather own as store of value, bananas or corn? The obvious answer is corn, because you can store it for months. Corn lasts longer than bananas. Fruit rots. You can also use corn for a lot of different things — corn flour, animal feed, etc. You can also arrange to sell corn into the future, say, by arranging to deliver corn so many days from today.

Corn can lose value, obviously, as can any real asset. But it is a better choice than holding the bananas.

Donlan likens paper money to bananas and natural resources to corn. “In the modern economy,” he writes, “a barrel of oil is much like a bag of corn… Paper money and bank balances are more like the bag of bananas.” When currency rots, we call that inflation.

The problem with the deflation arguments long term, it seems to me, is that you are betting against a government’s ability to destroy its own currency. Governments are seldom good at anything, but one thing they are undeniably good at is destroying their own currencies. The dollar has lost 95% or so of its value since 1913, the year the United States established the Federal Reserve. Enough said.

Long-term, betting that a government will safeguard its currency seems like a very bad bet. Deflation – or at least symptoms of deflation – may prevail today, but the real question is for how long. My own crystal ball is frustratingly cloudy on the issue. But the great rewards in investing are always with the out-of-consensus view.

The upside from holding Treasuries seems hardly worth the risk of being wrong, for instance. On the other hand, if we are right about currency rot, then we’ll make multiples of our money on natural resource stocks.

The downside on many commodities seems low, because the prices have already corrected. In several instances, as with oil and natural gas and iron ore, we are already below the marginal cost of production for much of the industry. So unless we don’t need these things at all anymore, the simple economics of the businesses involved help support a certain price structure.

And anyway, as far as the case for gold is concerned, I’ve been arguing that it is less about inflation or deflation than it is about creditworthiness in general. Gold does well during times of credit troubles. It did well in the 1930s, for instance, even though that was largely a deflationary era. Banking troubles made investors turn to gold.

On that front, we’ve got plenty of banking troubles on the way. Yesterday’s Wall Street Journal headline, buried in the middle of the paper, hints at what’s to come: “Pick-a-Pay Loans: Worse Than Subprime.” The piece begins:

“For the third straight month, option adjustable-rate mortgages are generating proportionately more delinquencies and foreclosures than subprime mortgages, the scourge of the U.S.”

These loans require only partial-interest payments each month. So the loan balances on many of these loans have actually gone up while housing prices have tumbled. Bad combination. As of April, 36% of these loans were at least 60 days past due.

These troubled loans will mean more large losses for banks — in particular for Wells Fargo, J.P. Morgan Chase and others who were active in these markets. Wells Fargo, the WSJ points out, has a mountain of this stuff — $115 billion of it.

So as long as we have banking troubles, we have the potential for fear to return in a big way. And that is when gold does well…with or without inflation. But I’m not counting inflation out just yet.

I’d use the market weakness in the gold price and in gold shares to pick up your favorite gold miners.

Source: Gold…If Not Now, When

We’re scanning markets of the world today and scratching our heads… haven’t we heard this before?
There was a scare at the start of the year – banks were in trouble, the housing market was crashing and unemployment was rising. The S&P fell at a rate unseen in a long, long time. But then,a sucker’s rally! The worst was likely over, they said… stocks were oversold. The U.S. consumer, China and oil companies promised to lead us out of this mess. And of course, the current administration’s new multibillion stimulus plan will kick in any second.

After bottoming in early March, stocks soared well off their lows. With the S&P 500 at break-even for the year, stocks now face an inflection point.

Wait a second… what year is it?

We need not remind you of what happened in the second half of 2008. But it’s not worth worrying about… it’ll be different this time!
Stocks took quite a tumble Thursday. The worse-than-expected jobs report gave traders more than enough reason to be short into the three-day weekend. The S&P 500 fell nearly 3%. Since reaching its 2009 high in early June, the S&P is down 5%.
Major indexes are in trouble again today. The Dow and S&P opened down 0.75%, mostly thanks to sour moods left over from Thursday.
And just as in 2008, the smart money says there is more pain ahead:

“You may have green shoots, whatever you want to call them,” said market sage and author of The Black Swan Nassim Taleb. “You may have temporary relief, but you are still in a world that’s breaking. We’re in the middle of a crash. So if I’m going to forecast something, it is that it’s going to get worse, not better.”

And the root of all our woes, Mr. Taleb? “The monkey on our back is debt.”

Amen. This should be deja vu to our most dedicated readers…Nassim shared a similar sentiment at the 2007 Agora Financial Investment Symposium. We expect equally prophetic forecasts from our speakers this year. If you haven’t signed up to join us, better get on it right now… the show starts in two weeks.
Just like in 2008, the logical move is to sell dollars and buy useful assets, like gold. But just like last year, the current trade du jour is buy greenbacks, sell everything else. After Thursday’s, stock sell-off, the dollar index broke out of its recent range. It had been hovering just around 80 and now goes for 80.7.
“The dollar system or the system based on the dollar and euro have shown that they are flawed,” Russian President Medvedev told the international press today, yet another call from a BRIC nation to ditch the dollar. He’ll meet with President Obama this week. We wonder if he’ll have the stones to bring this up:

“In the long term, we must also think about a single unit of payment such as the International Monetary Fund’s Special Drawing Rights. We cannot be hostages to the economic situation of a single country, as is happening today with the United States.”
“Of the major world currencies, I have to say that Australia’s dollar is my favorite,” writes our currency man Bill Jenkins. “It has an edge because of its commodity-related economies and currencies.

“Now, Canada has the same edge. In fact, you may hear the Canadian and Australian dollars called the CommDolls (commodity dollars) for short. But Canada is inextricably tied to its neighbor to the south (namely, us), and that’s more than just a little problematic.

“Australia, on the other hand, is not tied to the United States. Instead, it’s better placed to trade with another resource-hungry nation — China.

“As China attempts to lift itself up by its own bootstraps, Australia comes into the picture. It has been widely understood that Australia is a little China. Not in culture, custom or language, but in economics. A significant part of Australia’s commodities flow into China, and the more the Chinese move ahead, the better it is for Australia.

“Also, let’s consider that Australia’s central bank is still holding its interest rates at 3%. In a fairly stable country, with a fairly stable currency, that is one heck of an attractive rate. Why, it is downright appealing!

“Indeed, Australia may now become the benefiting member of the next carry trade. After all, if can you borrow money at 0.25% and invest it at 3%, you stand to make a decent haul. And as risk appetite re-enters the market, you can bet your bottom dollar that Australia will likely be a real beneficiary.”

That’s just a snippet from Bill’s latest special report, which his Master FX Options Traders received over the weekend. Only subscribers have access to this report, which includes his provocative new short euro trade. If you want in on the action, click here.
From a technical standpoint, gold looks set for some short-term pain. Just like stocks, the gold chart is taking a page from 2008. Check it out:

When it hit the fan last year, gold failed to deliver the righteous moonshot many had forecast. It certainly was a better place to be than stocks, but gold still suffered. Until further notice, the same playbook appears to be in use today… gold may be the once and future money, but the dollar and U.S. Treasuries remain the ultimate flight to quality when the going gets tough.

After sticking to a tight range the last few weeks, gold fell today along with stocks. The spot price shed $10, to $925 an ounce.
“I see everything coming up roses for gold and those who mine it,” says Chris Mayer, armed with proof he’s not the only value hound with his eye on gold.

“For the first time in a couple of decades, some of America’s most successful, big-name investors are buying gold. David Einhorn, the hedge fund manager who predicted the downfall of Lehman Bros., recently bought gold for the first time.

“And then there is John Paulson, the guy who made billions of dollars by correctly anticipating the housing bust and credit crisis. Paulson just plunked down $1.3 billion for an 11% stake in AngloGold. He’s also got a big position in Kinross Gold.

“Peter Munk, the 81-year-old chairman and founder of Barrick Gold, also offers up his own anecdote about gold’s broadening appeal. ‘I have had more phone calls in the past six months than ever before — from people who have $120,000 inherited from grandmother, and from hedge fund managers with millions,’ he says. ‘I am not saying George Soros, but people of that caliber have told me they are buying gold.’

“You no longer have to be a gold bug to think gold will rise in price. In fact, this buying by some of the world’s greatest investors may be the leading indicator for a quick 116% climb — to $2,000 per ounce or higher. Give gold the cold stare of a professional handicapper and the odds look very good, indeed.”

Chris just gave his Capital & Crisis readers another gold stock for the long haul. He tells us it’s “a miner in a in politically safer area with a growing production profile, falling costs, a good balance sheet and a stock that is cheap on the face of it.” Sounds hard to beat, eh? For access to this pick and the rest of the C&C portfolio, click here.
Oil’s down today, too. The front-month contract is off $2, to $66 a barrel.
The American service industry contracted again in June, the ISM reports today. Their monthly gauge of the service sector scored 47 last month, 3 points below a “growth” reading of 50. At least that’s an improvement from May’s score of 44. In fact, June was the third straight monthly increase… we’ll keep on an eye on this one.
The FDIC closed down seven banks late Thursday, a single-day record for the credit crisis. That brings the total to 52 for the year. Considering the five bank failures the week before, it’s clear the pace of bank busts is accelerating.
Last in today’s deja vu issue, a role reversal that doesn’t remind us of the last 18 months whatsoever. Get this: A struggling bank bailed out a municipality over the weekend.

In an unfortunate sign of the times, many communities across the country canceled fireworks shows for the Fourth. You know the drill… budgets are tight, revenues are down, savings are nil.

New Providence, N.J., was one of those towns, until its local bank stepped in. Investors Savings Bank blew the dust of its wallet and wrote New Providence a $12,000 check to finance the fireworks display. That’s a tiny sum, even for a community bank, and probably equal parts philanthropy and marketing. But good grief… it’s the first such role reversal we’ve heard in a long time.
“How can we expect a heavily debited consumer-based economy to ‘recover’?” asks a reader, with a barrage of rhetorical questions. “When borrowing and spending drives the economy and unemployment soars and credit shrinks, how can we expect an increase in spending? When our goal is to recover and we have issues like this to deal with, can we really get there from here? I don’t see how it’s possible. In my opinion, we have been in a depression for over a year and our path from here is down, not up. What am I missing? How can our consumer economy recover? What will a recovery from here look like?

“By the way, paying a million dollars to have lunch with Buffett, who just lost $30 billion, is beyond stupid. Buffett can make it in good times, but in bad times, do just the opposite of what he does and you will get some of his money!”

The Ghosts of 2008, Gold Stocks, A Currency Play, Bank Role Reversal and More!