<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; GPS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/gps/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:03:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>In the Race for a U.S. Economic Rebound, Growing Debt and Budget Deficits Remain the Biggest Possible Roadblock</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/in-the-race-for-a-us-economic-rebound-growing-debt-and-budget-deficits-remain-the-biggest-possible-roadblock/20117</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/in-the-race-for-a-us-economic-rebound-growing-debt-and-budget-deficits-remain-the-biggest-possible-roadblock/20117#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bookkeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget deficits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Projections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citing A Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Budget Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cumulative Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Digit Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Rebound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal budget deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Tax Receipts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joblessness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office Of Management And Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Omb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roadblock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scheme Of Things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TGT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TJX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US housing crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=20117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Even as investors get more and more bullish about the outlook for the U.S. economy, the economy’s underlying foundation continues to erode.</p>
<p>In a report to be released this week, the Obama administration will boost its 10-year projection for the federal budget deficit to about $9 trillion – an increase of roughly $2 trillion, or 29%, from its prior projection, <strong><em>Fox News</em></strong> reported over the weekend, citing a source from the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/" target="_blank">Office of Management and Budget</a> (OMB).</p>
<p>The new cumulative deficit projection – for 2010-2019 – replaces the <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/21/official-obama-increase-year-deficit-trillion/?test=latestnews&#38;test=health" target="_blank">administration’s previous estimate of $7.108 trillion.</a> Changes in budget projections – whether they result in a surplus or a deficit – are often refined as economic conditions change. This new projection was necessary because the recession has&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even as investors get more and more bullish about the outlook for the U.S. economy, the economy’s underlying foundation continues to erode.</p>
<p>In a report to be released this week, the Obama administration will boost its 10-year projection for the federal budget deficit to about $9 trillion – an increase of roughly $2 trillion, or 29%, from its prior projection, <strong><em>Fox News</em></strong> reported over the weekend, citing a source from the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/" target="_blank">Office of Management and Budget</a> (OMB).</p>
<p>The new cumulative deficit projection – for 2010-2019 – replaces the <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/21/official-obama-increase-year-deficit-trillion/?test=latestnews&amp;test=health" target="_blank">administration’s previous estimate of $7.108 trillion.</a> Changes in budget projections – whether they result in a surplus or a deficit – are often refined as economic conditions change. This new projection was necessary because the recession has gone on for so long, causing federal tax receipts to plunge – and because the economic rebound will be prolonged and weak, resulting in lower forecasts for future federal revenue.</p>
<p>Although most of the news media focuses on the Obama administration’s $787 stimulus measure, the fact is that the federal government was pushing forward with nearly $12 trillion in rebound-related financing commitments, <strong><em><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links">Money Morning</a></em></strong> <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/03/11/economic-rebound/" target="_blank">reported this spring</a>.</p>
<p>The administration earlier this year predicted that unemployment would peak at about 9% without the financial-jump-starting initiatives and 8% with them. But U.S. joblessness zoomed skyward anyway, and stood at 9.4% last month, although many economists now say that a double-digit unemployment rate – one of 10% or more – is easily possible.</p>
<p>The nation’s debt now stands at $11.7 trillion. In the scheme of things, that’s more important than talking about the deficit, which only looks at a one-year slice of bookkeeping and ignores previous debt that is still outstanding.</p>
<p>Back in June, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) predicted that the federal deficit would reach $1.825 trillion this year. The CBO and the Obama administration will tomorrow (Tuesday) separately release new budget-deficit predictions. Last Wednesday, a senior White House official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j8db-x8aZtGaU-FOMlbG5cSsIRWQD9A691LO1" target="_blank">told <strong><em>The Associated Press</em></strong> that the administration estimate would reach $1.58 trillion</a> – or triple last year’s deficit.</p>
<p>The report for the budget year that ends Sept. 30 also will predict Washington to spend $3.653 trillion this year, although revenue will reach only $2.074 trillion, the unnamed senior official told <strong><em>The AP</em></strong>.</p>
<p>“Whether it’s $1.6 trillion or $1.8 trillion, it’s pretty bad,” said Robert Bixby, executive director of the bipartisan fiscal watchdog <a href="http://www.concordcoalition.org/" target="_blank">The Concord Coalition</a>, told <strong><em>Fox News</em></strong>. “I hope no one tries to spin that as good news.”</p>
<p>Total U.S. debt has soared to $11.7 trillion (the budget deficit is the “shortfall” in the annual deficit, while the debt is cumulative), having balloned to that level as a result of the multiple annual deficits that have become the norm, it seems.</p>
<h4>Market Matters</h4>
<p>Just who is the world’s great economic superpower these days?  At times, it seems, “as China goes, so go the world equity markets.”  Early in the week, the <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=SHA:000001" target="_blank">Shanghai Composite Index</a> (SSE)</strong> suffered its largest percentage decline since late 2008, with the index plunging more than 20% for the month on concerns about the sustainability of China’s recovery.</p>
<p>The global markets watched as the Japan, Europe, and the U.S. indexes followed the SSE downward.  By mid-week, however, all eyes were back on the domestic market as another sell-off in China was overshadowed by signs of growing U.S. economic strength and reports of enhanced energy demand.</p>
<p>The global bailout plans moved into a new stage as the Swiss government relinquished its control over banking giant <strong>UBS</strong> <strong>AG (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AUBS" target="_blank">UBS</a>)</strong> by selling off its investment for a $1.13 billion profit, or a 30% annualized return.  While the U.S. government has yet to reap similar benefits, several major banks have paid off their Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) loans and the CEO for one of the poster children for financial distress, <strong>American International Group Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=AIG">AIG</a>)</strong>, announced that his firm should be able to pay back the government and may even be able to “do something for shareholders as well.”</p>
<p>While many auto dealers complained about the rebate process on the “Cash for Clunkers” program, <strong>General Motors Corp. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=General+Motors+Corp.">GRM</a>) </strong>stepped forward and will begin providing advances to participants who continue to wait for the government to move through its traditional red-tape.</p>
<p>The healthcare debate (and political infighting) raged on (complete with widespread town hall civil disobedience).  Rumors that the government would remove its public-health-plan option sent related health-care stocks soaring early in the week, though the jury remains out as to how this will really play after U.S. President Barack Obama guaranteed approval of an overhaul and then bashed congressional Republicans for their efforts in blocking any plan whatsoever.</p>
<p>On the earnings front, the housing sector received mixed signals as <strong>Home Depot</strong> <strong>Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=hd" target="_blank">HD</a>)</strong> bested expectations, while rival <strong>Lowe Companies Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ALOW" target="_blank">LOW</a>) </strong>fell short and reduced its outlook. Cost-cutting was widespread among retailers as The <strong>TJX Cos. Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ATJX" target="_blank">TJX</a>)</strong>, The <strong>Gap Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGPS" target="_blank">GPS</a>)</strong>, and even <strong>Target Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=TGT" target="_blank">TGT</a>)</strong> benefited from increased margins, though sales remained lackluster at best.</p>
<p><strong>Hewlett-Packard Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=HPQ" target="_blank">HPQ</a>)</strong> struggled in its PC and printer-business segments, though management expects a healthy rebound in its fiscal fourth quarter.</p>
<p>Fixed income benefited from some early “flight-to-quality” trades and a report that showed strong foreign demand for U.S. Treasuries in June (despite ongoing rumors to the contrary).  Stocks fell sharply in sympathy with the China sell-off, though buyers reemerged in a big way on positive signs from the earnings and economic reports.</p>
<p>Likewise, oil prices shook off some early week negativity and surged to 2009 highs, as a surprising plunge in inventory levels revealed growing demand – perhaps to coincide with the beginning of a global economic rebound?  On that note, U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke’s comments about the prospects for recovery (though slow at first) were extremely well-received as investors seemed to all but forget about following Shanghai and the U.S. markets assumed the leadership role once again.  The major domestic indexes shrugged off the weak start and pushed to new highs for the year.</p>
<p align="center">
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="480" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Market/ Index</strong></td>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Year Close (2008)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="85" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Qtr Close (06/30/09)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous Week</strong><br />
<strong>(08/14/09)</strong></td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Current Week </strong><br />
<strong>(08/21/09)</strong></td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Dow Jones Industrial</td>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,776.39</p>
</td>
<td width="85" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,447.00</p>
</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">9,321.40<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">9,505.96</p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+8.31%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">NASDAQ</td>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,577.03</p>
</td>
<td width="85" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,835.04</p>
</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,985.52<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2,020.90</p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+28.15%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">903.25</p>
</td>
<td width="85" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">919.32</p>
</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,004.09<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,026.13</p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+13.60%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Russell 2000</td>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">499.45</p>
</td>
<td width="85" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">508.28</p>
</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">563.90<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">581.51</p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+16.43%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Global Dow</td>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1526.21</p>
</td>
<td width="85" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,629.31<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,803.83<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,819.50</p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+19.22%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Funds</td>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="85" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0.25%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">10 yr Treasury (Yield)</td>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.24%</p>
</td>
<td width="85" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.52%<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.56%<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="71" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.56%</p>
</td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+132 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4>Economically Speaking</h4>
<p>In addition to the Home Depot and Lowe’s earnings reports, housing news was prevalent during the week and the results were somewhat confusing.  The <a href="http://www.nahb.org/" target="_blank">National Association of Home Builders</a> reported that its <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/housingmarketindex.asp" target="_blank">Housing Market Index</a> climbed for the second month in a row and reached its highest level in over a year.  Likewise, applications for mortgages increased for the third straight month on declining interest rates.</p>
<p>However, foreclosure rates remain on the rise and, according to the <a href="file:///%5C%5Csun%5CUserData%5CJKissane%5C9-28%20email%5CMortgage%20Bankers%20Association" target="_blank">Mortgage Bankers Association</a>, 13.2% of mortgages are delinquent or worse (in foreclosure); in fact, subprime mortgages are no longer the only area of concern as the <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/category/jobless-recovery/" target="_blank">unsettled labor picture</a> has prompted homeowners with strong credit to fall behind on their prime mortgages as well.</p>
<p>Though housing starts fell in July, the decline was entirely attributable to apartment activity and construction of single-family homes actually rose for the fifth straight month.  Additionally, existing home sales in July surged by more than 7% as buyers took advantage of the misfortunes of others (in foreclosure), though prices continue to fall because of transactions related to these distressed properties.</p>
<p>In non-housing news, separate regional reports from the New York and Philadelphia Feds boosted the outlook for the domestic manufacturing sector and the overall economy.  Wholesale inflation remained benign as the producer price index (PPI) fell by a wider-than-expected 0.9% in July and prices have plummeted over the past 12 months by the largest percentage (6.8%) since records have been kept, dating back to 1947.</p>
<p>Be forewarned: Oil just hit a 2009-high.</p>
<p>U.S. Federal Reserve policymakers met for their annual conference and Fed Chair Bernanke shared a favorable assessment about the recovery process from “the most severe financial crisis since the Great Depression.”  Of course, Bernanke tempered some of his remarks and reiterated that, while the recession seems to be coming to an end, the rebound would likely be slow, with unemployment remaining a concern.</p>
<p>Bernanke also spoke of the need for financial regulatory reform in order to ensure the current financial debacle isn’t repeated.  The Fed also extended its Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF) lending program in order to help stem the potential “challenges” that remain among commercial mortgage-backed securities.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="338" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="59" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Release</strong></td>
<td width="162" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Comments </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: left;" width="59" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 18</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Housing Starts (07/09)</td>
<td width="162" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Single-family starts up, though apartments dropped</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="59" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">PPI (07/09)</td>
<td width="162" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Much larger than expected decline in wholesale prices</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="59" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 20</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (08/15)</td>
<td width="162" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Surprising rise in claims for unemployment benefits</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="59" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Leading Indicators (07/09)</td>
<td width="162" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">4th consecutive monthly increase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="59" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 21</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Existing Homes Sales (07/09)</td>
<td width="162" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Best showing in almost 2 years</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="59" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="162" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="59" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 25</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Durable Goods Orders (07/09)</td>
<td width="162" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="59" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Consumer Confidence (08/09)</td>
<td width="162" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="59" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 26</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">New Home Sales (07/09)</td>
<td width="162" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="59" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 27</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (08/15)</td>
<td width="162" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="59" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 28</td>
<td width="109" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Personal Spending/Income (07/09)</td>
<td width="162" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/08/24/federal-budget-deficit-economic-rebound/">Source: In the Race for a U.S. Economic Rebound, Growing Debt and Budget Deficits Remain the Biggest Possible Roadblock</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/in-the-race-for-a-us-economic-rebound-growing-debt-and-budget-deficits-remain-the-biggest-possible-roadblock/20117/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will This Week’s Earnings Reports Reflect a Recovery or a Relapse for the U.S. Economy?</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/will-this-week%e2%80%99s-earnings-reports-reflect-a-recovery-or-a-relapse-for-the-us-economy/19961</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/will-this-week%e2%80%99s-earnings-reports-reflect-a-recovery-or-a-relapse-for-the-us-economy/19961#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Simpkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CARS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEOREP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Simpkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macy’s Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIMM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TGT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy Geithner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=19961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Several key second-quarter earnings reports could either validate or undercut assertions that the U.S. economy is poised for recovery.</p>
<p>After the Commerce Department reported last week that retail sales fell 0.1% in July from June, and 8.3% year-over-year, retailers will stay in the limelight this week as several high-profile companies report second-quarter earnings.<strong> Target Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=tgt" target="_blank">TGT</a>)</strong>, <strong>Limited Brands Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:LTD" target="_blank">LTD</a>)</strong>, and <strong>Gap Stores (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGPS" target="_blank">GPS</a>)</strong> are among the big-name retailers set to report.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the <strong>Hewlett-Packard Co’s (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=hpq" target="_blank">HPQ</a>) </strong>report will provide a further glimpse into the world of technology, and <strong>The Home Depot Co.’s (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AHD" target="_blank">HD</a>)</strong> results <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/30/housing-market-bottom/" target="_blank">will confirm or counter claims that the recent housing rebound is for real</a>.  On that note, the upcoming economic releases include July housing starts and&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several key second-quarter earnings reports could either validate or undercut assertions that the U.S. economy is poised for recovery.</p>
<p>After the Commerce Department reported last week that retail sales fell 0.1% in July from June, and 8.3% year-over-year, retailers will stay in the limelight this week as several high-profile companies report second-quarter earnings.<strong> Target Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=tgt" target="_blank">TGT</a>)</strong>, <strong>Limited Brands Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:LTD" target="_blank">LTD</a>)</strong>, and <strong>Gap Stores (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGPS" target="_blank">GPS</a>)</strong> are among the big-name retailers set to report.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the <strong>Hewlett-Packard Co’s (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=hpq" target="_blank">HPQ</a>) </strong>report will provide a further glimpse into the world of technology, and <strong>The Home Depot Co.’s (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AHD" target="_blank">HD</a>)</strong> results <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/07/30/housing-market-bottom/" target="_blank">will confirm or counter claims that the recent housing rebound is for real</a>.  On that note, the upcoming economic releases include July housing starts and existing home sales, while the wholesale inflation gauge may show that price pressures are not yet creeping into the producers’ side of the equation either.</p>
<h3><strong>Market Matters</strong></h3>
<p>While many more bearish analysts continue to proclaim “gloom and doom” and a drop back to the March-lows in equities, at least one noted naysayer may have shifted to the other team.  Hedge fund manager John Paulson purchased over $165 million shares of <strong>Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=bac" target="_blank">BAC</a>)</strong> to become the banking giant’s fourth largest shareholder.  Paulson was among the select few who predicted the subprime debacle, so his allocation into financials may be interpreted as a nice vote of confidence from an unexpected source.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the U.S. Federal Reserve made a few bold moves to promote its case for recovery as well.  Following the policy meeting, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/08/12/federal-reserve-4/" target="_blank">Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke announced his intent to cease the program of buying up to $300 billion of Treasuries in October</a>, as a major economic lifeline may have served its purpose well.  Additionally, banks have scaled back borrowing from the Fed’s emergency short-term lending facility, a sign that the frozen credit markets have thawed considerably.</p>
<p>Finally, the <a href="http://www.cars.gov/" target="_blank">Car Allowance Rebate System</a> (<a href="http://www.cars.gov/" target="_blank">CARS</a>), popularly known as <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/08/06/cash-for-clunkers-2/" target="_blank">“Cash for Clunkers,” was expanded</a>, allowing car buyers to receive vouchers for future purchases as automakers report dwindling inventories.</p>
<p>Retailers took center stage in the earnings game as <strong>Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=WMT" target="_blank">WMT</a>) </strong>and <strong>Kohl’s Corp. (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AKSS" target="_blank">KSS</a>) </strong><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/08/13/retail-sales-wal-mart/" target="_blank">beat expectations</a>, but still offered cautious projections for the months ahead (including the upcoming holiday season).  <strong>Macy’s Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AM" target="_blank">M</a>)</strong> posted a declining profit, but gave an optimistic outlook, as it benefits from cost-cutting measures.  <strong>Liz Claiborne Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ALIZ" target="_blank">LIZ</a>)</strong>, on the other hand, reported a wider loss and new streamlining plans and <strong>J.C. Penney Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=jcp" target="_blank">JCP</a>)</strong> issued some pessimistic comments about the state of the consumer.</p>
<p>Seemingly recession-proof <strong>McDonalds Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=mcd" target="_blank">MCD</a>)</strong> announced strong July same-store sales as its coffee drinks competed effectively with the “big boys.”  On the transactional front, China continued its expansion into the global commodities markets as <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=12421020" target="_blank">China National Petroleum Corp.</a></strong> and <strong>CNOOC Ltd</strong>. <strong>(NYSE ADR: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:CEO" target="_blank">CEO</a>)</strong> have eyes on the Argentinean unit of <strong><a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=rep" target="_blank">Repsol YPF</a> SA’s (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AREP" target="_blank">REP</a>) </strong>to the tune of $17 billion.<strong> Microsoft Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=MSFT" target="_blank">MSFT</a>) </strong>and <strong>Nokia Corp. (NYSE ADR: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:NOK" target="_blank">NOK</a>) </strong>are teaming up to take on PDA leader <strong>Research in Motion</strong> <strong>Ltd. (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=rimm" target="_blank">RIMM</a>)</strong> in an alliance that brings the popular software together with a solid cellular player.</p>
<p>Fixed income investors got a boost from a successful 30-year bond auction, as $75 billion in new Treasury securities were well-received during the week.  The Treasury also announced a plan to issue more TIPS (inflation-adjusted bonds), a move aimed at alleviating concerns in China (the largest foreign holder of U.S. debt) that the government would allow a surge in inflation as it tries to finance the stimulus plans.</p>
<p>Higher inflation would increase the yields on TIPS and result in greater costs for the government.  Bond prices fell mid-week after the Fed announced its intent to end its Treasury purchase program, though the auction news was a welcome relief and a late-week flight-to-quality also ensued.</p>
<p>Investors focused on the lackluster consumer activity – illustrated by both earnings and economic releases – and worried that economic growth will be stunted as long as shoppers remain in hibernation.</p>
<p>Despite favorable reviews by the Fed, major equity indexes gave up slight ground during the week with the <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP:.INX" target="_blank">Standard &amp; Poor’s 500 Index</a></strong> and <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXNASDAQ:.IXIC" target="_blank">Nasdaq Composite Index</a></strong> still flirting with 1,000 and 2,000 respectively.</p>
<p><strong><em> </em></strong></p>
<table style="height: 186px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="408" align="left" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Market/ Index</strong></td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Year Close (2008)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Qtr Close (06/30/09)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous Week</strong><br />
<strong>(08/07/09)</strong></td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Current Week </strong><br />
<strong>(08/14/09)</strong></td>
<td width="70" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Dow Jones Industrial</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,776.39</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,447.00</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">9,370.07<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">9,321.40</p>
</td>
<td width="70" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+6.21%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">NASDAQ</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,577.03</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,835.04</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2,000.25<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,985.52</p>
</td>
<td width="70" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p style="text-align: right;"><strong>+25.90%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">903.25</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">919.32</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,010.48<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,004.09</p>
</td>
<td width="70" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+11.16%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Russell 2000</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">499.45</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">508.28</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">572.40<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">563.90</p>
</td>
<td width="70" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+12.90%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Global Dow</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1526.21</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,629.31<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,801.78<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,803.83</p>
</td>
<td width="70" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+18.19%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Funds</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0.25%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="70" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">10 yr Treasury (Yield)</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.24%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.52%<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.85%<strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.56%</p>
</td>
<td width="70" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+132 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3></h3>
<h3></h3>
<h3></h3>
<h3></h3>
<h3></h3>
<h3></h3>
<h3></h3>
<h3><strong>Economically Speaking</strong></h3>
<p>No rest for the weary (especially when auditioning to keep a job).  Fed Chief Bernanke guided the latest Fed policy meeting that saw strong signs (and language) pointing to the recession nearing an end.  The Fed claimed the economy is “leveling out” and felt the Treasury purchase program could go away with no material detriment to the nation’s financial system.</p>
<p>The accompanying statement also indicated that the funds rate would remain just above zero for “an extended period” as many anticipate the recovery will be slow to take hold.  Noted economists apparently have Bernanke’s back as a recent survey revealed that most prefer he remain on as Fed Chair for another four-year term and President Barack Obama should reappoint him based on his strong performance in righting the ship during the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression</p>
<p>Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner shared some tough talk as he objected to certain concerns that major financial companies have not learned their lessons and the recent profits are indications of pre-crisis-like risk-taking.</p>
<p>The economic data of the week offered mixed signals as retail sales surprisingly declined in July despite the popularity of the “clunker” program, though continuous claims for unemployment benefits fell to the lowest level since April.</p>
<p>The anticipated rebirth of the consumer may be on hold for now as the Reuters/U. of Michigan sentiment index fell again and individuals continue to worry about the state of the job market.</p>
<p>While the trade deficit increased in June, exports climbed for the second consecutive month and manufacturers experienced increased demand for products like semiconductors and telecommunication devises.  Likewise, industrial production rose in July as the “new and improved” domestic automakers attempt to get back on track.</p>
<p>On another favorable note, inflation remains a non-issue as the consumer price index (CPI) was unchanged from June and prices have fallen by 2.1% over the past year.  On the global stage, the French and German economies posted surprising growth in the second quarter and, though the broader Eurozone countries continue to contract, the recovery is already taking hold in that region of the world.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="262" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td width="81" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Release</strong></td>
<td width="127" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Comments </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 12</td>
<td width="81" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Balance of Trade (06/09)</td>
<td width="127" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Increase in exports good news for manufacturing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="81" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Policy Meeting Statement</td>
<td width="127" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Economy appeared to be “leveling out”</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 13</td>
<td width="81" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (08/08)</td>
<td width="127" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Lowest level of continuing claims since April 11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="81" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Retail Sales (07/09)</td>
<td width="127" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Disappointing decline despite “clunkers” program</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 14</td>
<td width="81" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">CPI (07/09)</td>
<td width="127" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Sharpest year-over-year price drop since 1950</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="81" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Industrial Production (07/09)</td>
<td width="127" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">1st increase in 9 months</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></td>
<td width="81" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="127" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 18</td>
<td width="81" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Housing Starts (07/09)</td>
<td width="127" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="81" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">PPI (07/09)</td>
<td width="127" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">August 20</td>
<td width="81" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (08/15)</td>
<td width="127" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="81" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Leading Indicators (07/09)</td>
<td width="127" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="46" valign="top">August 21</td>
<td width="81" valign="top">Existing Homes Sales (07/09)</td>
<td width="127" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/08/17/us-economy-earnings-report/"><br />
</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/08/17/us-economy-earnings-report/">Source: Will This Week’s Earnings Reports Reflect a Recovery or a Relapse for the U.S. Economy?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/will-this-week%e2%80%99s-earnings-reports-reflect-a-recovery-or-a-relapse-for-the-us-economy/19961/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>History Hints that Current Stock Market Rally May Be the Leading Edge of a New Bull Market</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/history-hints-that-current-stock-market-rally-may-be-the-leading-edge-of-a-new-bull-market/17616</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/history-hints-that-current-stock-market-rally-may-be-the-leading-edge-of-a-new-bull-market/17616#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AXP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPHIQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIATY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford Motor Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMGMQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy Geithner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=17616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<p>If history is our guide, then the rally we’ve seen in U.S. stocks in recent weeks is more than just a periodic run-up in share prices – it’s the initial stage of a prolonged bull market.</p>
<p>The 13-week rally the <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI" target="_blank">Dow</a> <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI" target="_blank">Jones Industrial Average</a></strong> has experienced off its March lows is the most powerful surge that index has seen since the Great Depression. If we look to history, stocks should continue to rally over the next three months.</p>
<p>&#8220;I say this with the utmost confidence and my fingers tightly crossed: This is the start of a new bull run,&#8221; Hugh Johnson, chairman of Johnson Illington Advisors, told <strong><em>MarketWatch.com</em></strong>.</p>
<p>The 13-week stretch from March 9 through May 29, which saw the Dow soar 28.3%, has been bested only&#8230;</p></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<p>If history is our guide, then the rally we’ve seen in U.S. stocks in recent weeks is more than just a periodic run-up in share prices – it’s the initial stage of a prolonged bull market.</p>
<p>The 13-week rally the <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI" target="_blank">Dow</a> <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI" target="_blank">Jones Industrial Average</a></strong> has experienced off its March lows is the most powerful surge that index has seen since the Great Depression. If we look to history, stocks should continue to rally over the next three months.</p>
<p>&#8220;I say this with the utmost confidence and my fingers tightly crossed: This is the start of a new bull run,&#8221; Hugh Johnson, chairman of Johnson Illington Advisors, told <strong><em>MarketWatch.com</em></strong>.</p>
<p>The 13-week stretch from March 9 through May 29, which saw the Dow soar 28.3%, has been bested only once – by the 40.8% run-up the Dow enjoyed in the 13 weeks that followed its hitting a bottom in May 1932. The Dow surged an additional 3.1% last week.</p>
<p>Going back to 1900 – in any given quarter (13 weeks) – there have been 18 cases in which the market surged 20% or more, Johnson said.</p>
<p>Looking at the trends, the odds are strong that the Dow will be higher three weeks from now, and that means the odds are strong that the index will be higher three months from now.</p>
<p>&#8220;Based on history, who knows where we’re going to be four weeks from now? But in 12 weeks, the odds are we’ll be 3.8% higher,&#8221; Johnson said.<br />
That can’t be guaranteed, however, since there has been at least case where stocks had a huge quarter, only to plunge afterward: In May 1929, the Dow zoomed 26% in 13 weeks – only to plunge 38.9% in the 12 weeks that followed.</p>
<h3>Market Matters</h3>
<p><strong>General Motors</strong> <strong>Corp. (OTC: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC%3AGMGMQ" target="_blank">GMGMQ</a><strong>)</strong> officially filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and another U.S. icon has been laid to rest (until the “new” GM emerges better than ever).  With another $30 billion in government aid in hand, GM quickly moved forward by financing the acquisition of supplier <strong>Delphi Corp. (OTC: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=DPHIQ" target="_blank">DPHIQ</a>) </strong>by a buyout firm that will help it emerge from its own bankruptcy; reaching an agreement to sell Saturn to <strong>Penske Automotive Group Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=pag" target="_blank">PAG</a>)</strong>; and entering into a deal to unload Hummer to China’s <strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sichuan_Tengzhong_Heavy_Industrial_Machinery_Company_Ltd" target="_blank">Sichuan Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery Corp</a></strong>. (though regulatory “challenges” are sure to hold up that one).  Meanwhile, <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=4090940" target="_blank">Chrysler LLC</a> </strong>progressed with its own restructuring <strong>Fiat SpA (OTC ADR: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC%3AFIATY" target="_blank">FIATY</a>), </strong>much to the chagrin of about 800 dealers; and <strong>Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=f" target="_blank">F</a>) </strong>plans to increase production to take advantage of the misfortunes of its primary competitors.</strong></p>
<p>Shifting to a more “stable” industry, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair seem to be targeting <strong>Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=c" target="_blank">C</a>)</strong> for a management shake-up, a move that could give regulators greater control of the one-time financial behemoth.  Smith Barney brokers found their new homes as a significant joint venture between Citi and <strong>Morgan Stanley</strong> <strong>(NYSE: C)</strong> was completed.  Citi also attempted to save face from the prior <strong>American International Group Inc.</strong> <strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AAIG" target="_blank">AIG</a>)</strong> embarrassment by announcing plans to withhold millions in previously promised severance packages to former execs. On the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) front, <strong>JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=jpm" target="_blank">JPM</a>)</strong>, Morgan Stanley, and <strong>American Express</strong><strong>Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=axp" target="_blank">AXP</a>)</strong> each revealed plans for stock offerings as they race to become the first major bank to repay “bailout” moneys.  With GM now in bankruptcy and Citi struggling to overcome its own problems, the<strong>Dow Jones Industrial Average</strong> is replacing them with <strong>Cisco Systems</strong>Inc. <strong>(Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=csco" target="_blank">CSCO</a>)</strong> and The <strong>Travelers Cos. Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=trv" target="_blank">TRV</a>)</strong>effective June 8.</p>
<p>Energy prices resumed their higher trek, as crude spiked above $70 a barrel for the first time since last October, despite reports that showed demand at its lowest level in 10 years.  <strong>Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=gs" target="_blank">GS</a>) </strong>analysts upwardly revised their projections for future global demand and warned of a “likely return to energy shortages” in 2010.  As gas prices have skyrocketed about 50 cents above last month’s levels, consumers are facing pressures at the pumps that threaten to hinder some of next year’s anticipated growth in the economy.</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="440">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top"><strong>Market/ Index</strong></td>
<td width="60" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>Year Close (2008)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>Qtr Close (03/31/09)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous Week</strong><br />
<strong>(05/29/09)</strong></td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>Current Week </strong><br />
<strong>(06/05/09)</strong></td>
<td width="102" valign="top">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top">Dow Jones Industrial</td>
<td width="60" valign="top">
<p align="right">8,776.39</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">7,608.92</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">8,500.33<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">8,763.13</p>
</td>
<td width="102" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>-0.15%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top">NASDAQ</td>
<td width="60" valign="top">
<p align="right">1,577.03</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">1,528.59</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">1,774.33<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">1,849.42</p>
</td>
<td width="102" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>+17.27%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td width="60" valign="top">
<p align="right">903.25</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">797.87</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">919.14<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">940.09</p>
</td>
<td width="102" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>+4.08%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top">Russell 2000</td>
<td width="60" valign="top">
<p align="right">499.45</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">422.75</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">501.58<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">530.36</p>
</td>
<td width="102" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>+6.19%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top">Global Dow</td>
<td width="60" valign="top">
<p align="right">1526.21</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">1347.38</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">1,653.06<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">1,680.43</p>
</td>
<td width="102" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>+10.10%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top">Fed Funds</td>
<td width="60" valign="top">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>0.25%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="102" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>0 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top">10 yr Treasury (Yield)</td>
<td width="60" valign="top">
<p align="right">2.24%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">2.68%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">3.47%<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top">
<p align="right">3.86%</p>
</td>
<td width="102" valign="top">
<p align="right"><strong>-162 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Economically Speaking</h3>
<p>It looks like fixed-income traders are not the only ones concerned about the expanding debt position in this country.  U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke warned that the government “can’t borrow indefinitely” and politicos need to take crucial steps to reduce a budget deficit that is rapidly approaching $2 trillion.   Bernanke again confirmed his belief that the economy will move beyond recession by late 2009, though he also warned that the weak jobs market (among other conditions) will restrict future expansion.</p>
<p>Speaking of labor, the unemployment data highlighted the week’s releases <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/06/unemployment-rate-4/" target="_blank">and the jobless rate surged to 9.4%</a>, a new 25-year high, as 345,000 nonfarm jobs were lost from the economy.  However, even bad news becomes good news these days as economists had predicted a far more substantial loss (525,000 jobs), and the May decline was the smallest since October 2008.  Still, more than six million folks have seen their jobs disappear since the recession began in December 2007 and May represents the seventeenth consecutive month of labor contraction.</p>
<p>In other news, the manufacturing sector appears to be on the verge of recovery (though ever-so-slightly) as the ISM index reported its best showing since September 2008.  On the housing front, construction spending jumped for the second straight month and pending home sales experienced its biggest increase in eight years.  Personal income surprisingly rose in April, a positive sign for future consumer activity.  Though retailers reported weaker-than-expected same-store sales for May, analysts were quick to point out that <strong>Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=wmt" target="_blank">WMT</a>)</strong> is no longer participating in these reports, a decision that should skew the numbers lower because the world’s largest retailer accounts for about 10% of total retail sales.  Luxury chains and department stores were among the worst performers last month, while The <strong>Gap Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=gps" target="_blank">GPS</a>) </strong>benefited from a nice increase in activity at its Old Navy chain.</p>
<p>U.S. Treasury Secretary <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/03/china-dollar-debt/" target="_blank">Timothy Geithner ventured over to China</a> during the week where he praised it leaders for past stimulus measures (a tad different tact than used by his predecessor).  Recently, China has complained about the ballooning U.S. debt and analysts remain worried about its continued participation in our Treasury auctions.  The domestic powers-that-be have long criticized China about unfair trade practices and currency issues.</p>
<p>While the respective leaders have reservations about each other’s policies, Geithner’s remarks may be seen as smoothing over relations as our combined efforts will be imperative to securing an effective and long-lasting global recovery.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="318">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td width="114" valign="top"><strong>Release</strong></td>
<td width="151" valign="top"><strong>Comments</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top">June 1</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">Personal Income/Spending (04/09)</td>
<td width="151" valign="top">Income increased; savings rate highest in 50 years</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top"></td>
<td width="114" valign="top">ISM – Manu – (05/09)</td>
<td width="151" valign="top">Stronger than expected showing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top"></td>
<td width="114" valign="top">Construction Spending (04/09)</td>
<td width="151" valign="top">Surprising rise for 2nd straight month</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top">June 3</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">Factory Orders (04/09)</td>
<td width="151" valign="top">Increase in orders, though lower than anticipated</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top"></td>
<td width="114" valign="top">ISM – Services (05/09)</td>
<td width="151" valign="top">8th straight monthly contraction</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top">June 4</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">Initial Jobless Claims (05/30/09)</td>
<td width="151" valign="top">Total claims fell for first time in 2009</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top">June 5</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">Unemployment Rate (05/09)</td>
<td width="151" valign="top">Climbed to 9.4%, a new 25-year high</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top"></td>
<td width="114" valign="top">Non-farm Payroll (05/09)</td>
<td width="151" valign="top">345k decline in jobs not as bad as expected</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top"></td>
<td width="114" valign="top">Consumer Credit (04/09)</td>
<td width="151" valign="top">2nd largest drop in borrowing on record</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top"><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></td>
<td width="114" valign="top"></td>
<td width="151" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top">June 10</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">Balance of Trade (04/09)</td>
<td width="151" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top"></td>
<td width="114" valign="top">Fed Beige Book</td>
<td width="151" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top">June 11</td>
<td width="114" valign="top">Retail Sales (05/09)</td>
<td width="151" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="45" valign="top"></td>
<td width="114" valign="top">Initial Jobless Claims (06/06/09)</td>
<td width="151" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/08/bull-market-for-stocks/">History Hints that Current Stock Market Rally May Be the Leading Edge of a New Bull Market</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/history-hints-that-current-stock-market-rally-may-be-the-leading-edge-of-a-new-bull-market/17616/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Europe’s Banks Next to be Stressed?</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/are-europe%e2%80%99s-banks-next-to-be-stressed/16478</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/are-europe%e2%80%99s-banks-next-to-be-stressed/16478#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRZBY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIATY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gelyf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Financial System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joblessness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loan Losses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stress Tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TJX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WFC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=16478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Now that the results of the U.S. bank stress tests are finally in the books, the extent of the capital shortfalls are known and – in many cases – are actually being addressed.</p>
<p>But there’s now another problem looming – one that could ultimately  weigh down the global financial system<strong>.</strong></p>
<p>The problem: Europe’s banks.</p>
<p>As economies slow in other parts of the world, rising joblessness and plunging housing prices and escalating loan losses are putting banks under pressure. That’s especially true in Europe, where consumers and companies are continuing to run into trouble.</p>
<p><strong>Royal Bank of Scotland PLC (NYSE ADR: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ARBS" target="_blank">RBS</a>), </strong>now 70% state-owned, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSL8101909220090508?sp=true" target="_blank">fell  to a loss in the first quarter</a> and wrote down $3.17 billion in risky assets  after its bad debts quadrupled&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that the results of the U.S. bank stress tests are finally in the books, the extent of the capital shortfalls are known and – in many cases – are actually being addressed.</p>
<p>But there’s now another problem looming – one that could ultimately  weigh down the global financial system<strong>.</strong></p>
<p>The problem: Europe’s banks.</p>
<p>As economies slow in other parts of the world, rising joblessness and plunging housing prices and escalating loan losses are putting banks under pressure. That’s especially true in Europe, where consumers and companies are continuing to run into trouble.</p>
<p><strong>Royal Bank of Scotland PLC (NYSE ADR: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ARBS" target="_blank">RBS</a>), </strong>now 70% state-owned, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSL8101909220090508?sp=true" target="_blank">fell  to a loss in the first quarter</a> and wrote down $3.17 billion in risky assets  after its bad debts quadrupled to $4.37 billion.</p>
<p>Bank executives &#8220;[expect] a slowdown in financial-market activity compared with the very buoyant conditions seen in Q1,&#8221; Chief Executive Officer <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/officerProfile?symbol=RBS.N&amp;officerId=1236036" target="_blank">Stephen  Hester</a> told <strong><em>Reuters</em></strong>.</p>
<p>In Germany, <strong>Commerzbank AG (OTC  ADR: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC%3ACRZBY" target="_blank">CRZBY</a>)</strong> had to take a $1.61 billion charge from its investment bank and a $72.38 million charge from commercial real estate initiatives, resulting in a $1.2 billion loss for the quarter.</p>
<p>In late December, the Institute of International Finance released <a href="http://www.etftrends.com/2008/12/global-bank-losses-whats-damage-etfs.html" target="_blank">its  global economic outlook for 2009</a>, and estimated that banks around the world had collectively lost nearly $1 trillion – $678 billion from U.S. banks and $300 billion from their European counterparts.</p>
<p>That was in December. We know it got worse – a lot worse – for U.S. banks after that point. Thanks to a mix that included lots of government bailout and an injection of new capital from investors, U.S. banks have experienced an improvement in their outlook.</p>
<p>Indeed, U.S. Federal Researve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke stated that the banks tested are all solvent and the results should provide &#8220;considerable comfort about the health of the banking system.”</p>
<p>But in the five months since that Institute of International Finance report was issued, it’s  likely that European banks have experienced a major decline in their fortunes.</p>
<p>Last week’s release of the bank stress tests results removed significant  uncertainty about the U.S. banks, since <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/05/09/bofa-stock-sales/" target="_blank">it created a  blueprint of what the troubled institutions needed to do</a> to stabilize their  finances. <strong>Morgan Stanley (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:MS" target="_blank">MS</a>)</strong> and <strong>Wells Fargo  &amp; Co. </strong>(<strong>NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=wfc" target="_blank">WFC</a></strong>) have  announced plans to raise an aggregate $15 billion in capital. <strong>Bank of  America Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=bac" target="_blank">BAC</a>)</strong> plans to sell assets and issue more common stock after being told by the federal government that it must raise $33.9 billion to adequately guard against “more adverse” economic conditions.</p>
<p>Bank of America <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/05/08/bank-stress-test-results-4/" target="_blank">was one of 10 banks told by the government to raise more  capital following the so-called stress test</a>. The government concluded that BofA faces a potential $136.6 billion in losses from troubled loans and investments in 2009 and 2010. The bank’s $34 billion capital shortfall was more than twice that of Wells Fargo, which had the second greatest capital need.<br />
Are we destined to see this all play out now in Europe?</p>
<h4><strong>Market Matters</strong></h4>
<p>Shifting back to autos, <strong>General Motors  Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:GM" target="_blank">GM</a>)</strong> lost  $6 billion in the first quarter and is shopping Saturn to <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=EPA:RNO" target="_blank">Renault SA</a></strong> of France as  it moves closer to its restructuring deadline (and potential bankruptcy).  China’s <strong>Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd. (PINK: <a href="http://www.icstrust.com/en/about-us-bkks.html" target="_blank">GELYF</a>)</strong> has interest in GM’s Saab unit, and <strong>Fiat  SpA </strong><strong>(OTC ADR: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC:FIATY" target="_blank">FIATY</a>)</strong><strong> </strong>may look to complement its <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?cid=4090940" target="_blank">Chrysler LLC</a></strong> line with  the German Opel (also late of GM).   Meanwhile, <strong>Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:F" target="_blank">F</a>)</strong> claims to be on track with its restructuring plan and still believes it can manage just fine without any government assistance.  On the earnings’ front, <strong>The Walt Disney Co. (NYSE:<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:DIS" target="_blank"> DIS</a>)</strong> and <strong>Kraft  Foods Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:KFT" target="_blank">KFT</a>)</strong> bested estimates, while Cisco offered some mixed results as its better than expected numbers actually prompted some profit-taking among techs.</p>
<p>A poorly received 30-year Treasury auction sent bond prices tumbling as fixed income investors focused on the massive programs the government will need to finance over the next few years.  Oil prices surged above $58 a barrel for the first time in six months as traders seemingly failed to consider rising inventory levels and instead bought on signs (feeble as they are) of an economic recovery that would lead to enhanced energy demand.</p>
<p>The <strong>Standard  &amp; Poor’s 500 Index</strong> pushed beyond the crucial 900 level and ended the week in positive territory for the year.  Techs struggled late as investors realized any economic rebound would not translate into capital expenditures overnight.  Still, the <strong>Nasdaq Composite Index</strong> has outperformed the other indexes on a year-to-date basis.  With stress tests out of the way, where will the next leaks come from?</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="460" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Market/ Index</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center">Year Close (2008)</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center">Qtr Close (03/31/09)</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center">Previous Week<br />
(05/01/09)</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center">Current Week<br />
(05/08/09)</td>
<td width="101" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center">YTD Change</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Dow Jones    Industrial</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,776.39</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">7,608.92</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,212.41</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,574.65</p>
</td>
<td width="101" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">-2.30%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">NASDAQ</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,577.03</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,528.59</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,719.20</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,739.00</p>
</td>
<td width="101" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">+10.27%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">903.25</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">797.87</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">877.52</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">929.23</p>
</td>
<td width="101" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">+2.88%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Russell 2000</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">499.45</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">422.75</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">486.98</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">511.82</p>
</td>
<td width="101" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">+2.48%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Funds</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="101" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0 bps</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="87" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">10 yr Treasury    (Yield)</td>
<td width="60" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.24%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.68%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.17%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.29%</p>
</td>
<td width="101" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">+105 bps</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4><strong>Economically Speaking</strong></h4>
<p>U.S. retailers released same-store sales data  for April and the results were actually quite promising.  As usual, <strong>Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:WMT" target="_blank">WMT</a>)</strong> led the charge  with a 5% increase in activity, while <strong>Children’s Place Retail Stores Inc.  (Nasdaq: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:PLCE" target="_blank">PLCE</a>)</strong>, <strong>Stage  Stores Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:SSI" target="_blank">SSI</a>)</strong>, <strong>Gap Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:GPS" target="_blank">GPS</a>),</strong> and <strong>The TJX Cos. Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:GPS" target="_blank">TJX</a>)</strong> were among those stores that posted better-than-expected results and beat analysts’ expectations.  A late-Easter holiday (April instead of March) helped many retailers as consumers waited until the last minute (as has become the norm) for their related holiday shopping.</p>
<p>On the global front, the European Central Bank dropped its key lending rate by 25 bps to 1%, and initiated other monetary moves to stabilize its (16-country) economy.  Likewise, the Bank of England announced a plan to buy up government and corporate bonds, thus, increasing its money supply.</p>
<p>Speaking of the labor market, the U.S. unemployment rate climbed in April to 8.9%; however, only 539,000 jobs were lost from the economy.  The contraction represented the smallest in six months and was below most analysts’ expectations.  Still, since December 2007, about 5.7 million domestic jobs have disappeared and businesses continue to be slow to hire until they see additional signs of greater stability in the economy.</p>
<p>Construction spending climbed in March after five consecutive monthly declines, though the gains were attributed to non-residential activity and the housing sector remains sluggish at best.  In more promising news, the National Association of Realtors reported a 3.2% increase in pending homes sales, the second straight monthly gain.  Because the release is considered a predictive indicator, analysts took it as a favorable sign that sales activity may pick up in the months ahead.</p>
<p>Weekly Economic  Calendar</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="351" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Date</td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Release</td>
<td width="168" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Comments</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">May 4</td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Construction    Spending (03/09)</td>
<td width="168" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">1st increase in 6 months</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">May 5</td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">ISM – Services    (04/09)</td>
<td width="168" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">7th consecutive monthly contraction, but improving</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">May 7</td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless    Claims (05/02/09)</td>
<td width="168" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Best showing in 14 weeks.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Consumer Credit    (03/09)</td>
<td width="168" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Biggest decline in borrowing in 18 years</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">May 8</td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Unemployment Rate    (04/09)</td>
<td width="168" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Climbed to 8.9%, highest since 1983</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Non-farm Payroll    (04/09)</td>
<td width="168" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fewer jobs lost than anticipated</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">The Week Ahead</td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="168" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">May 12</td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Balance of Trade    (03/09)</td>
<td width="168" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">May 13</td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Retail Sales    (04/09)</td>
<td width="168" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">May 14</td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">PPI (04/09)</td>
<td width="168" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless    Claims (05/09/09)</td>
<td width="168" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">May 15</td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">CPI (04/09)</td>
<td width="168" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="107" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Industrial    Production (04/09)</td>
<td width="168" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" /><!--Session data--><br />
<input id="jsProxy">
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/05/11/european-bank-stress-test/">Are Europe’s Banks Next to be Stressed?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/are-europe%e2%80%99s-banks-next-to-be-stressed/16478/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Wal-Mart (WMT) Lead Retailers out of the Recession Muck?</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/can-wal-mart-wmt-lead-retailers-out-of-the-recession-muck/13375</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/can-wal-mart-wmt-lead-retailers-out-of-the-recession-muck/13375#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Hill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASKS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slowdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=13375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With thinning household budgets, deteriorating retirement and home prices taking a nosedive, Wal-Mart (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AWMT">WMT</a>) is a leading recession retailer. But can it clean up the other casualties in its sector? Christian Hill of <a href="http://www.investorsdailyedge.com"  class="alinks_links">Investors Daily Edge</a> offers us his advice.</p>
<blockquote><p>Anyone can look in my closet and tell that I am not much of a shopper. I generally only replace things when they are beyond repair. As my girlfriend likes to point out, I have a pair of jeans from a store that went out of business years ago. Perhaps it&#8217;s my Midwest nature, but if they still fit, I&#8217;m wearing them. Holes be damned.</p>
<p>Obviously, this means I don&#8217;t set foot in malls very often. Usually it is only to redeem the&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With thinning household budgets, deteriorating retirement and home prices taking a nosedive, Wal-Mart (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AWMT">WMT</a>) is a leading recession retailer. But can it clean up the other casualties in its sector? Christian Hill of <a href="http://www.investorsdailyedge.com"  class="alinks_links">Investors Daily Edge</a> offers us his advice.</p>
<blockquote><p>Anyone can look in my closet and tell that I am not much of a shopper. I generally only replace things when they are beyond repair. As my girlfriend likes to point out, I have a pair of jeans from a store that went out of business years ago. Perhaps it&#8217;s my Midwest nature, but if they still fit, I&#8217;m wearing them. Holes be damned.</p>
<p>Obviously, this means I don&#8217;t set foot in malls very often. Usually it is only to redeem the gift cards I get at Christmas.</p>
<p>So, over the past few weekends, armed with my Christmas bounty, I was off to the mall. I could see it in my mind: empty parking lots, and everything 90% off.</p>
<p>We are in a recession after all. And it was far enough after the holidays that the malls would be deserted. I could park right by the door, get in and out without any long lines and not return for another 11 months.</p>
<p>You know what they say about assumptions.</p>
<p>The place was absolutely packed. The parking lot was nearly full, and while it wasn&#8217;t a last weekend before Christmas throng of shoppers, there were a startling amount of people with apparently nothing else to do on a beautiful 70 degree Sunday afternoon in Florida.</p>
<p>But we are in a recession. How can this be? Just window shoppers?</p>
<p>Unfortunately, that is very likely. According to the January Business Wire&#8217;s Monthly Retail Report, same store sales still fell 1.6 percent in January, but with a very large asterisk.</p>
<p>That large asterisk being Wal-Mart (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=wmt">WMT</a>).</p>
<p>While Wal-Mart saw same-store sales increase 2.1 percent in January, it&#8217;s weighting in the Index (53 percent) heavily skewed the final reading.</p>
<p>Take out Wal-Mart, and the rest of the retail landscape isn&#8217;t pretty at all.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGPS">Gap </a>– 23 percent drop</li>
<li><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ASKS">Saks </a>– 23.7 percent drop</li>
<li><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AJCP">JC Penney</a> – 16.7 percent drop</li>
</ul>
<p>Unfortunately for retailers, it doesn&#8217;t look like they will be turning the corner anytime soon. Faced with a continued slowdown in the economy and shrinking disposable income, it may take 90 percent off sales to get shoppers in the door.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s the flipside of generating foot traffic with such heavy markdowns. With such heavy markdowns, margins must be razor-thin, or just not there. My guess is to move older inventory to make way for the new spring merchandise, many items are being let go at or below cost. This is going to have a serious impact on first quarter earnings figures.</p>
<p>Go long WMT, short just about everything else in the retail sector. You can see the full monthly retail report <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090205005644&amp;newsLang=en" target="_blank">here.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.investorsdailyedge.com/Article.aspx?Id=1914">Source: Can Wal-Mart Lead Other Retailers Out Of The Muck?</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/can-wal-mart-wmt-lead-retailers-out-of-the-recession-muck/13375/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retailers Battle Sales Slump… Russia And Ukraine Battle Each Other</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/retailers-battle-sales-slump%e2%80%a6-russia-and-ukraine-battle-each-other/11208</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/retailers-battle-sales-slump%e2%80%a6-russia-and-ukraine-battle-each-other/11208#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Lichtenfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gazprom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Lichtenfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Denholm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SKS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine gas crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Retail Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=11208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With stores tripping over themselves to offer steep holiday season discounts, their efforts were largely in vain, as many consumers simply weren’t financially able to take full advantage. Even the beast that is <strong>Wal-Mart </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?client=news&#38;q=wmt" target="_blank">WMT</a>) struggled to make much headway. As we reported yesterday, Thomson-Reuters projected a 2.8% same-store sales rise for the firm in December. But the actual results proved otherwise.</p>
<p>Considered to be a beneficiary of the tightened household budgets, the company reported a paltry 1.7% increase in same-store sales. As a result, it cut its earnings outlook.</p>
<p>Thomson-Reuters was right about one thing, though: Higher-end retailers got spanked &#8211; some of them quite dramatically. For example, <strong>Saks</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=sks" target="_blank">SKS</a>) posted a 20% decline in same-store sales, while <strong>Gap</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=gps" target="_blank">GPS</a>)&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With stores tripping over themselves to offer steep holiday season discounts, their efforts were largely in vain, as many consumers simply weren’t financially able to take full advantage. Even the beast that is <strong>Wal-Mart </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?client=news&amp;q=wmt" target="_blank">WMT</a>) struggled to make much headway. As we reported yesterday, Thomson-Reuters projected a 2.8% same-store sales rise for the firm in December. But the actual results proved otherwise.</p>
<p>Considered to be a beneficiary of the tightened household budgets, the company reported a paltry 1.7% increase in same-store sales. As a result, it cut its earnings outlook.</p>
<p>Thomson-Reuters was right about one thing, though: Higher-end retailers got spanked &#8211; some of them quite dramatically. For example, <strong>Saks</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=sks" target="_blank">SKS</a>) posted a 20% decline in same-store sales, while <strong>Gap</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=gps" target="_blank">GPS</a>) sales sank by 14%.</p>
<p>So how can investors play this? If you’re like me, when bad news hits, you look to snap up quality companies on the cheap. But retail stocks are just too dangerous right now. While taking the opposite approach of the main sentiment often pays off, I expect retail to head lower for the next few months.</p>
<p>If you’re looking for bargains, buy the retailers’ goods, not their stocks.</p>
<p><strong>A New Cold War</strong></p>
<p>No progress.</p>
<p>That’s the verdict from the latest round of talks aimed at solving the increasing crisis over Russia’s decision to cut off gas supplies to the Ukraine &#8211; one that is affecting gas supplies throughout Europe in the depths of winter.</p>
<p>European Union officials, plus those from Russia and the Ukraine were set for more negotiation in Brussels today, but those talks were cancelled, despite a meeting between Russia’s <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=LON:GAZP">Gazprom</a> CEO Alexei Miller and Oleg Dubyna of Ukrainian firm Naftogaz in Moscow on Wednesday evening.</p>
<p>The dispute stems from a disagreement over prices, contracts, unpaid bills from the Ukraine to Russia in 2008, and Russia’s accusations that the Ukraine has stolen gas from pipelines that pass through the country. And as tensions have risen, Russia shut the taps off a week ago &#8211; a move that has resulted in some EU nations (mostly in eastern and central Europe) seeing their gas supplies dramatically curtailed, or cut off entirely, because Russia accounts for about 25% of EU gas supplies &#8211; 80% of which are pumped through the Ukraine, according to the BBC.</p>
<p>Countries not receiving any gas at all from the Ukraine include the Czech Republic, Romania, Greece, Austria, Bulgaria, Hungary and Croatia.</p>
<p>Flash back two years and you’ll find a mirror image of the situation today, when Gazprom and Ukraine battled over gas supplies and caused shortages in several EU nations.</p>
<p>This dispute will eventually be resolved, but with much of the EU in the midst of a brutal cold spell, it can’t come soon enough. Meantime, Gazprom has vowed to pump extra supplies to the EU through other non-Ukrainian pipelines.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.smartprofitsreport.com/archives/retailers-bank-of-england-russia-ukraine-battle.html">Source: Retailers Battle Sales Slump… Bank Of England Battles Recession… Russia And Ukraine Battle Each Other</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/retailers-battle-sales-slump%e2%80%a6-russia-and-ukraine-battle-each-other/11208/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Economy in 2009, Pain Will Precede the Promise</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/us-economy-in-2009-pain-will-precede-the-promise/10612</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/us-economy-in-2009-pain-will-precede-the-promise/10612#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shah Gilani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Slowdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed Funds Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gdp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hilton Hotels Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JWN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEHMQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pension Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shah Gilani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TGT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Neiman Marcus Group Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Jobless Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=10612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If there’s a proverb that captures the outlook for the U.S. economy in the New Year, it’s the one that says: “It’s always darkest before the dawn.”</p>
<p>Regardless of any formal announcement of whether or not the United States drops into an actual recession, the ongoing credit crisis guarantees a contraction of the American economy by virtually every measure we know. That period of darkness will be marked by a dramatic slowdown in economic activity, as well as by rising unemployment, additional declines in U.S. stock prices, and constant volatility. It could last as long as 12-18 months.</p>
<p>But when the dawn does come, it will be one to remember. If U.S. President-elect Barack Obama gets it right &#8211; and I have&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there’s a proverb that captures the outlook for the U.S. economy in the New Year, it’s the one that says: “It’s always darkest before the dawn.”</p>
<p>Regardless of any formal announcement of whether or not the United States drops into an actual recession, the ongoing credit crisis guarantees a contraction of the American economy by virtually every measure we know. That period of darkness will be marked by a dramatic slowdown in economic activity, as well as by rising unemployment, additional declines in U.S. stock prices, and constant volatility. It could last as long as 12-18 months.</p>
<p>But when the dawn does come, it will be one to remember. If U.S. President-elect Barack Obama gets it right &#8211; and I have every reason to believe that he will &#8211; then investors will be presented with the greatest investment opportunity of our generation. At that point, shares of American companies will be at such low levels that wholesale buying by individuals, mutual funds, pension funds, institutional money managers, and foreign-controlled sovereign wealth funds, will generate gains that will not only make us whole, they will make us rich once again.</p>
<h3>A Market Mandela</h3>
<p>Creating an analysis of the U.S.  economy’s outlook for the New Year is akin to creating a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandala" target="_blank">mandala</a>, a geometric work of art whose pattern, symbolically or metaphysically, represents a microcosm of the universe from the human perspective. In some Buddhist temples, mandalas are made of tiny colored beads, painstakingly created by several monks as a form of meditation. In celebration of the ever-changing nature of the universe, the mandala is then joyously shaken by its creators, until it is once again nothing more than chaos embodied in a box of colored beads.</p>
<p>Regardless of the big picture, analysis of a mandala &#8211; or the economy &#8211; always starts at the center and emanates outward. With the U.S. economy, that centerpiece is credit. The credit crisis has shaken the complex mandala that is our economy and transformed the United States economy into chaos. It’s complex because this economic-forecast mandala derived its form from thousands of individual pieces &#8211; in the case of the economy, from scores of data points, many of which are currently dark and foreboding.</p>
<p>The credit crisis we are experiencing results from the contraction &#8211; or worse, the cessation &#8211; of lending. Under normal circumstances, institutions and markets freely facilitate capital movement between lenders and borrowers. But that’s not happening, now.</p>
<p>Because of a lack of transparency into the balance sheets of borrowers holding such complex and illiquid securities as collateralized debt obligations, credit-default swaps, and non-performing loans, and because of increasing recessionary fears affecting businesses and households, lenders don’t want to increase their loan exposure. Banks are holding onto the cash and liquid securities they control, using them as a cushion against their own potential losses. The U.S. Treasury Department’s direct-to-bank capital injections do not alter these banking realities. In fact, as a <strong><em><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links">Money Morning</a></em></strong> investigative story recently demonstrated, instead of using these taxpayer-provided infusions to increase their lending, these <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/30/banking-system-bailout-money/" target="_blank">banks  are using the money to finance takeover deals</a>.</p>
<h3>The Recipe for a Recession</h3>
<p>Whether or not the United States  is technically in a recession ultimately will be divined by the <a href="http://www.nber.org/" target="_blank">National Bureau of Economic Research</a> (NBER).  The business-cycle dating committee of this privately run, nonprofit economic  research group <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=5b2a1b8a6b684e7988b9c5bdd893b081&amp;siteid=nwhpm&amp;sguid=KutBgB74bkqGZ7oUpERU9A" target="_blank">is  right now studying five factors in an attempt to determine if the United States  has entered a recession</a> and, if so, when that downturn started, <strong><em>MarketWatch.com</em></strong> reported. Those five factors are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Gross Domestic Product (GDP).</li>
<li>Industrial production.</li>
<li>Employment</li>
<li>Income.</li>
<li>Retail sales.</li>
</ul>
<p>Regardless of any formal announcement by the NBER of whether we’re in a recession, the credit crisis guarantees a general contraction of economic activity, by every measure.</p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/07/news/economy/karydakis_jobs.fortune/?postversion=2008110715" target="_blank">“Any doubt that we’re officially in a  recession can be put aside,”</a> Anthony Karydakis, former chief U.S.  economist for JPMorgan Asset Management (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=jpm" target="_blank">JPM</a>) &#8211; and now a professor  at New York University’s Stern School of Business &#8211; recently wrote in <strong><em>Fortune</em></strong> magazine. “The rapid deterioration of labor markets points to a sharp decline in hours worked and output in the fourth quarter. This is likely to lead to a decline in personal consumption to the tune of 5.0% or so for that period. Since [consumer spending] makes up about 70% of the economy, the stage has already been set for real GDP to shrink at a more than 4.0% rate in the fourth quarter.”</p>
<p>Confirmation of that belief is evident by looking at each of the NBER’s five key indicators.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Gross Domestic Product (GDP)</strong>: The U.S. Commerce Department estimated that the U.S. economy, as measured by GDP, rose 0.9% in the first quarter. In the second quarter, GDP advanced an estimated 2.8%. For the third quarter, GDP declined an estimated 0.3%. My own econometric models suggest that GDP actually contracted at a 1.5% pace in the third quarter and will decline another 2.75% in the fourth quarter. For the year, that would mean the U.S. economy actually fell 0.55%. The U.S. economy last posted a full year’s negative GDP in 1991, when it declined 0.2%. <strong>Verdict: Recession</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>Industrial       Production</strong>: This measure of output by the nation’s factories and mines dropped 2.8% in September, and a very steep 6.0% in the third quarter. <strong>Verdict: Recession.</strong></li>
<li><strong>Employment</strong>: The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics announced Friday that October’s unemployment rate was 6.5%, a jump of 0.4%, which was double what most economists expected, and also its highest level in 14 years. The economy has now lost a total of 1.2 million jobs since the beginning of the year, with <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/07/news/economy/karydakis_jobs.fortune/?postversion=2008110715" target="_blank"> nearly half of those losses  occurring in the last three months </a>alone, pointing to an  acceleration in the pace of erosion in labor markets. Karydakis, the Stern  School professor, wrote in<br />
<strong> <em> Fortune </em> </strong>: “By way of comparison, during the 2001 recession and in the sluggish growth that followed in 2002-03, the unemployment rate reached a peak of only 6.3%, in June 2003. We’ve already exceeded that mark and, given that we are still in the early phase of the current recession, the unemployment rate should be expected to push toward the 7.5% range &#8211; and possibly higher &#8211; during the next three months to six months.”<br />
<strong> Verdict: Recession.</strong></li>
<li><strong>Income</strong>: Personal income increased $24.5 billion, or 0.2%, and disposable personal income (DPI) increased $25.7 billion, or 0.2%, in September. <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/pce.asp" target="_blank">Personal consumption       expenditures</a> (PCE) decreased $33.6 billion, or 0.3%. Excluding the       rebate payments made to U.S. taxpayers under the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_Stimulus_Act_of_2008" target="_blank">Economic       Stimulus Act of 2008</a>, DPI increased $30.3 billion, or 0.3%, in       September, and increased $44.0 billion, or 0.4%, in August. <strong>Verdict:       Too close to call</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>Retail       Sales</strong>: October retail sales are coming in well below already-diminished expectations, and some reports have been downright depressing &#8211; including <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=3942017" target="_blank">The Neiman Marcus       Group Inc</a>. -26.8%; The Gap Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGPS" target="_blank">GPS</a>) -16%; The       Nordstrom Group (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AJWN" target="_blank">JWN</a>)       -15.7%; J.C. Penny Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=jcp" target="_blank">JCP</a>) -13%; Kohl’s Corp.       (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AKSS" target="_blank">KSS</a>)       -9%;  Ltd. Brands Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ltd" target="_blank">LTD</a>) -9%; Target Corp.       Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=tgt" target="_blank">TGT</a>) -4.8%;       and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=wmt" target="_blank">WMT</a>)       +2.4%. In a report last week, Moody’s Investors Service (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mco" target="_blank">MCO</a>) projected that the retail sector’s woes will continue into 2009 as consumers cut back on buying apparel, footwear and accessories “in order to save money for essentials.” The credit rating firm said in a separate report that holiday spending “will prove even weaker than expected,” amid October’s financial-market swoon. <strong>Verdict: Recession.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>If U.S. exports are taken out of the GDP calculations going back to January, it’s apparent that there has been very little domestic growth in the economy. And when revisions are finalized in the next few months, we’ll be looking back at the recession that we’re all but certain is upon us right now. Until the credit markets are freed up and borrowers are extended credit at reasonable rates, it’s unlikely that credit, the centerpiece of the economy, will be anything other than a major cog in the wheel.</p>
<p>There are some signs of a thaw,  but not anytime soon. The <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/10/federal-funds-target-rate/" target="_blank">U.S.  Federal Reserve’s lowering</a> of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_funds_rate" target="_blank">Fed  Funds target rate</a> to 1.0%, and coordinated rate reductions by the Bank of England and the European Central Bank, as well as other major world-wide central banks, may start to ease the stranglehold gripping the worldwide credit markets. The London interbank offered rate (Libor), a critical interest rate against which trillions of dollars of mortgages, bank loans and derivatives are priced, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/23/mortgage-re-sets/" target="_blank">dropped to 2.39%  last week</a> from a high of 4.82% on Oct. 10.</p>
<p>The prospect of President-elect Obama’s choosing a different means of attacking the credit crisis will be closely watched and, by itself, may create an air of confidence that perceptions will change. But changed perceptions will not be enough.</p>
<p>The truth about our economic outlook is that it is predicated on demonstrably better transparency. If U.S. banks follow the lead of their European counterparts, which <a href="http://www.iasplus.com/europe/0811ec.pdf" target="_blank">have recently been freed from  fair-value, mark-to-market accounting</a>, and which may retroactively mark assets to “internal models” back to July, then balance-sheet clarity will continue to be cloaked in darkness. Lack of confidence in the banking system will persist, especially among the banks themselves. The first order of attack needs to be the creation of a fundamental leadership position that leads to an open, transparent and accountable measure of balance sheet assets and liabilities. As long as failing banks are being propped up, this cycle of credit contraction will persist.</p>
<p>The outlook for the economy is inextricably tied to the price of oil. The run-up of benchmark crude this summer to the record $145 a barrel level, and its subsequent fall to half that level, has wreaked havoc throughout the economy. Similarly, the run-up in commodity prices, and their subsequent fall, also has caused a lot of damage. Together, the dramatic rise and fall in the pricde of oil and other commodities is a harbinger of greater volatility in the future.</p>
<h3>Follow the Money</h3>
<p>Follow the money. Capital rapidly inflated the tech-stock bubble. When that bubble burst, capital flowed into and flooded the hard-asset world of real estate. When that bubble burst fast, speculative money dove into oil and commodities. When the U.S. and world economies looked weak, those bubbles burst. The looming threat of inflation this past summer instantly gave way after the drop of oil, gold, metals and agricultural commodities. And now, <em>deflation</em> is seen as the looming  threat on the horizon.</p>
<p>Which threat should we worry about?</p>
<p>The answer is &#8211; both. The prospect for near-term deflation seems all too real. As raw material prices fall and finished good prices fall due to a lack of purchasing power resulting from lack of credit and world-wide recessionary fears, the U.S. consumer has fundamentally changed his or her collective psychology. Is U.S. consumerism, which is responsible for 70% of GDP, in full retreat? If it is, as all measures project, then it’s likely that government stimulus efforts will overshoot their intended mark.<br />
Just look at what the United  States has done already as it battles this financial crisis. It has:</p>
<ul>
<li>Handed out  more than $150 billion in stimulus rebate checks.</li>
<li>Floated a  $700 billion financial bailout rescue plan &#8211; almost $160 billion of which has  already been placed.</li>
<li>Bailed out  American International Group Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=aig" target="_blank">AIG</a>), to the tune of $125  billion.</li>
<li>Covered JP  Morgan Chase &amp; Co.’s bet on taking over<br />
<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=The+Bear+Stearns+Cos" target="_blank">The Bear  Stearns Cos</a>. &#8211; to the tune of $29 billion.</li>
<li>Looked to <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/11/04/big-three/" target="_blank">lend struggling  automakers</a> $25 billion.</li>
<li>Agreed to  guarantee depositors at all banks.</li>
<li>Stepped in  to buy commercial paper that no one else will buy.</li>
<li>Guaranteed  money-market-fund investors.</li>
<li>And  backstopped the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), Fannie Mae (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=fnm" target="_blank">FNM</a>) and Freddie Mac (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=fre" target="_blank">FRE</a>).</li>
</ul>
<p>And now we’re getting wind of another stimulus package and more  help for everyone.</p>
<p>If, in six months to a year, the credit markets are facilitating borrowers again, the massive buildup of U.S. debt will result in a falling dollar and higher interest rates.</p>
<p>That spells inflation.</p>
<p>A massive re-inflation of the economy portends another flood of speculative money into oil and commodities. The cycles are increasingly condensed, more volatile and will be increasingly more disruptive.</p>
<p>Welcome to the brave new world of  global finance and speculation.</p>
<p>The Federal Reserve’s balance sheet has ballooned from $900 billion to more than $1.8 trillion. That’s 13% of GDP. The Treasury Department has telegraphed <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/11/05/700-billion-banking-bailout/" target="_blank">its intention to float $550 billion of debt in the fourth quarter and estimates it will have to float another $368 billion in the first quarter of 2009</a>. Our  national debt will then be close to 49% of GDP.</p>
<p>If there is an easing of credit in the economy, and borrowers come to market with the pent-up demand that has not been met for the past year, the competition for funds will raise interest rates. Higher interest rates will counter any stimulus effect from government programs.</p>
<p>Who will buy U.S. Treasury debt if the world is less apprehensive about credit quality? Lenders will once again seek higher returns, potentially forcing the Treasury Department to increase its rates. The potential of this event may sink the dollar if investors perceive that the U.S. economy is stagnant and the world is awash in dollars. The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yield_curve" target="_blank">yield curve</a> &#8211; the spread between the Treasury’s two-year and the 10-year paper &#8211; has been steepening. A steepening yield curve, where short-term borrowing costs are low and long-term rates considerably higher, is good for banks that borrow short and lend long.</p>
<p>But if the perception of risk  diminishes, and the perception of future inflation increases, the <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/invertedyieldcurve.asp" target="_blank">yield curve  will invert</a> and the threat of rising rates will cause a sell-off in the short end of the curve and a rush into longer-dated maturities. Any increase in short-term interest rates would be painful for struggling banks. An <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/invertedyieldcurve.asp" target="_blank">inverted  yield curv</a>e would be devastating, and inevitably would lead to more bank  failures.</p>
<h3>Home on the Range …</h3>
<p>At the core of the U.S. economy sits a desperately ailing piece of the mandala &#8211; the U.S. housing market. The once bright prospect of home ownership, which historically formed a beautiful economic picture, right now doesn’t exist. For most Americans, the family home constituted the bulk of their wealth. Or at least it did. And this family financial portrait will get worse before it gets better, since the real estate collapse is far from over. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=gs" target="_blank">GS</a>), for instance, projects  another 15% drop in housing prices.</p>
<p>I think that’s conservative. Mortgage rates are actually rising as Fannie and Freddie have to pay higher interest on their short-term notes and bonds. Thirty-year fixed-rate mortgage paper averaged 6.47% last week, up from its 52-week low of 5.36%. The 15-year fixed paper was trading at 6.18%, up from its 52-week low of 4.91% (based on <a href="http://www.bankrate.com/" target="_blank">Bankrate.com</a> (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:RATE" target="_blank">RATE</a>) rate surveys). This trend is definitely not our friend. As housing prices continue to fall, and inventories stagnate and grow in many areas, homeowners are increasingly underwater and are increasingly entertaining foreclosure as a viable economic alternative to indentured servitude.<br />
The <a href="http://hopeforhomeownersact.us/" target="_blank">Hope for Homeowners Plan</a>, which looks to lower interest rates and reduce principal on mortgages, and which makes homeowners pay a share of the appreciation on their home to their lender when they sell it, was initiated in October and was expected to garner some 400,000 takers. As of last week, according to <strong><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></strong>,  there had been only 42 takers. That’s not a misprint &#8211; 42 &#8211; I even checked with <strong><em>The Journal</em></strong>.</p>
<p>In the real estate realm, the proverbial “other shoe” hasn’t dropped yet, but certainly is dangling &#8211; and that’s commercial real estate. As homeowners writhe in agony and stop spending, retailers will go out of business, businesses of all stripes will suffer and commercial real estate will implode. The leverage left over from just the private equity foray into commercial real estate in the acquisitive 2006-2007 period is staggering. Refinancing will be impossible. Banks are stuck with hundreds of billions of dollars of leveraged loans that they took on as bridge and mezzanine financing from the private-equity shops alone, at the time believing they would  be able to securitize those loans and sell them off to investors.</p>
<p>There’s no chance of that, now.</p>
<p>One deal in particular  illustrates this entire mess.  Private  equity behemoth The Blackstone Group LP (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=bx" target="_blank">BX</a>) took <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=Hilton+Hotels+Corp" target="_blank">Hilton Hotels  Corp</a>. private for $26 billion. Blackstone put up $6 billion of its own money as equity and borrowed the other $20 billion from Bear Stearns, Bank of America Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=bac" target="_blank">BAC</a>),  Deutsche Bank AG (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=db" target="_blank">DB</a>),  Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ms" target="_blank">MS</a>),  Merrill Lynch &amp; Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mer" target="_blank">MER</a>)  and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (OTC: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=OTC%3ALEHMQ" target="_blank">LEHMQ</a>).</p>
<p>Based on a current analysis of the deal at the multiple of seven times projected cash flow that the market currently puts on Starwood Hotels &amp; Resorts Worldwide Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AHOT" target="_blank">HOT</a>) -  Hilton’s nearest rival &#8211; if Blackstone values its property comparably, it will have to mark its Hilton holdings down 50%, because it paid 13 times projected cash flow. That wipes out all of Blackstone’s equity in the deal. What’s more, the $4 billion portion of the loan that Bear Stearns took on, courtesy of JP Morgan Chase casting off Bear’s orphaned liabilities, now sits on the Fed’s balance sheet &#8211; and isn’t likely to go anywhere anytime soon.</p>
<p>Until the real estate cycle completes its implosion and begins to stabilize, there’s nothing that will fundamentally alter the outlook for the economy. This is Ground Zero. President-elect Obama must resist creating only a political solution to the overwhelming economic problem of declining house prices and declining real estate prices in general. Any attempt to put a band aid on this economic plague will only delay the day of reckoning. I regret deeply the conclusion that the lake must be drained before we can realistically climb out of it. But there just aren’t enough ferrymen to get us all to shore.</p>
<h3>Always a Silver Lining &#8211; My  Forecast</h3>
<p>The outlook for the economy is not rosy &#8211; and that’s an understatement. But there is a silver lining. Even in the near term, the stock market will present innumerable wealth-creation opportunities.</p>
<ul>
<li>First, there  are plenty of shorting opportunities out there now, and more will present  themselves in the future.</li>
<li>Second, in due course &#8211; in perhaps 12-18 months &#8211; we will be presented with the investment opportunity of our generation. If President-elect Obama gets it right, and I believe he’s got the potential to bring us all together and get the country through this (and if you’re reading this Mr. President-elect, I’d like to put in my vote for [New York Fed President] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Geithner" target="_blank">Timothy Geithner</a> as next U.S. treasury secretary), American companies will be able to be purchased so cheaply that fortunes will be made. The recovery will not only make us whole, it will make our people and our nation rich again.</li>
</ul>
<p>I have absolutely no doubt that the United States will lead the world back into balance. The sea change that has arrived is the result of the conservative experiment having lost its true moorings, pushing the economy into disaster. Not that a wholesale swinging of the pendulum to the other side would be good. In fact, it would be disastrous. We have the potential to end up with a new, fair, transparent and judiciously regulated environment where capital formation can again spread its wings and the U.S. economy can fly.</p>
<p>There are new hands reaching into the colorful box of beads that comprise the American landscape and economy. From any human perspective, the United States is more than a microcosm of the universe; it is the center of the world as we know it. It will take time to construct the new mandala. We all need to meditate on the process to ensure that the design we embrace will ultimately be inclusive, forward-looking and &#8211; like all great art &#8211; an inspiration to all who view it.</p>
<p><a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/29/recession/">For the U.S. Economy in the New Year, the Pain Will  Precede the Promise</a></p>
<p>Editor&#8217;s Note: This is the second installment of a new series that  looks at the global investing outlook for 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/us-economy-in-2009-pain-will-precede-the-promise/10612/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>eBay (EBAY) To Thrive On American Thrift</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/ebay-ebay-to-thrive-on-american-thrift/9616</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/ebay-ebay-to-thrive-on-american-thrift/9616#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Snyder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Snyder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bear market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Monday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBAY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online retailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=9616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Cyber Monday was better for online retailers than most expected. But consumers were only interested in heavily-discounted goods. That&#8217;s why <strong>Andrew Snyder</strong> thinks <strong>eBay </strong>(NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AEBAY" target="_blank">EBAY</a>) is well placed to turn a profit this Christmas. It not only attracts bargain hunters, but also sellers desperate to raise cash. And better still, it has a balance sheet that most companies dream of these days.</p>
<blockquote><p>During the Great Depression, financially devastated Americans sold turnips along side the road to make ends meet. Today, they merely boot up their computer and sell their junk online.</p>
<p>For proof, I called up an acquaintance that makes her living buying and selling on <strong>eBay </strong>(NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AEBAY" target="_blank">EBAY</a>). She answered the phone sounding like she had just spent the last 48 hours on&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cyber Monday was better for online retailers than most expected. But consumers were only interested in heavily-discounted goods. That&#8217;s why <strong>Andrew Snyder</strong> thinks <strong>eBay </strong>(NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AEBAY" target="_blank">EBAY</a>) is well placed to turn a profit this Christmas. It not only attracts bargain hunters, but also sellers desperate to raise cash. And better still, it has a balance sheet that most companies dream of these days.</p>
<blockquote><p>During the Great Depression, financially devastated Americans sold turnips along side the road to make ends meet. Today, they merely boot up their computer and sell their junk online.</p>
<p>For proof, I called up an acquaintance that makes her living buying and selling on <strong>eBay </strong>(NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AEBAY" target="_blank">EBAY</a>). She answered the phone sounding like she had just spent the last 48 hours on a runaway treadmill. She was tired and grumpy.</p>
<p>“So how did Cyber Monday treat you,” I asked.</p>
<p>“It was insane. I have more orders than I can handle,” I think she replied. In her tired and mumbling tone, it was hard to know exactly what she said.</p>
<p>I do know she cursed and hung up on me when I told her to hang on to her hat with Green Monday and its huge shopping volumes on the way. Experts are predicting it will be the biggest online retailing day of the year.</p>
<p><strong>Mr. And Mrs. Clause go online</strong></p>
<p>While my auction-dealing friend was overworked and tired, I am sure she is glad for the surge in eBay spending. In all, online retail spending was up by 15% or so on Cyber Monday, the closely monitored first day back to work after the Thanksgiving holiday.</p>
<p>While online retailers like <strong>Amazon </strong>(NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=amzn" target="_blank">AMZN</a>), <strong>Gap </strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=gps" target="_blank">GPS</a>) and <strong>Best Buy </strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=bby" target="_blank">BBY</a>) raked in their share of the $846 million spent last Monday, the Web’s largest auction site saw its selling activity soar. EBay reported a 50% year-over-year increase, thanks to its fixed-price sales surging by over 125% from last year.</p>
<p>When the nation’s economy locks its brakes, one of the first places discount shoppers and money-hungry sellers head is eBay. The site’s foundation is built on allowing individual sellers to unload their unwanted “junk” for cash.</p>
<p>As tens of thousands of Americans hit the unemployment line, they are turning to eBay for a shot at some quick and easy cash. Financially desperate sellers will unload just about anything they can live without in order to pay their winter heating bills, mortgages, and, of course, their burgeoning Christmas debt.</p>
<p><strong>Some more discount buying</strong></p>
<p>Wall Street has hammered eBay’s valuation over the past twelve months. A year ago, shares were trading for nearly $35. Today, the few folks savvy enough to buy are getting their shares for just $13.</p>
<p>Unlike so many other companies trading on the major exchanges, eBay does not have any desperate liquidity issues. It does not have to beg to creditors to extend debt maturities. It will not be diluting shares with a last-ditch attempt to increase capitalization. And most importantly, it is in a position to increase its market depth through strategic acquisitions and in-house development.</p>
<p>I know a lot of folks do not like the company’s management. eBay’s CEO, John Donahoe, has made some controversial decisions and certainly plenty of mistakes, but a company with a significant cash cushion and a near-total lack of debt cannot be overlooked by value-minded investors.</p>
<p>This is one of those plays where you have to put emotions aside and look at the reality of the economic situation and the numbers the company is producing. If a bank or manufacturer could post a balance sheet like eBay’s, investors would be drooling to get in on the action.</p>
<p>The worst is behind eBay and its future looks bright. Take a look at the stock and see if it fits your portfolio. I am positive you will like what you see.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.todaysfinancialnews.com/us-stocks-and-markets/ebay-nasdaqebay-takes-advantage-of-online-spending-6146.html">Source: eBay (NASDAQ:EBAY) takes advantage of online spending</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/ebay-ebay-to-thrive-on-american-thrift/9616/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4 Low-End Retailers To Dodge Sector Slump</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/4-low-end-retailers-to-dodge-sector-slump/9509</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/4-low-end-retailers-to-dodge-sector-slump/9509#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Denholm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bear market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circuit City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discount retailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dltr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linens N Things Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Denholm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TGT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sharper Image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TJX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=9509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Early indicators suggest that there is still some life left in the American consumer. The hordes were back out for the Thanksgiving weekend, though mega discounts means retailers will still struggle to break even. <strong>Martin Denholm</strong> says investors should stick with bargain-oriented retailers like <strong>Wal-Mart</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=wmt">WMT</a>) and <strong>TJX Companies</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=TJX">TJX</a>).</p>
<p>This from Smart Profits Report:</p>
<blockquote><p>‘Tis the season to… well, spend. And in a credit-oriented nation, Americans again proved that they do that better than the rest. The National Retail Federation (NRF) says 172 million consumers hit the malls or logged on to buy goods over the extended Thanksgiving weekend &#8211; a 17% jump from the same period in 2007. And ShopperTrak says “Black Friday” sales rose 3% to $10.6 billion over “B.F. 2007,” with&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Early indicators suggest that there is still some life left in the American consumer. The hordes were back out for the Thanksgiving weekend, though mega discounts means retailers will still struggle to break even. <strong>Martin Denholm</strong> says investors should stick with bargain-oriented retailers like <strong>Wal-Mart</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=wmt">WMT</a>) and <strong>TJX Companies</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=TJX">TJX</a>).</p>
<p>This from Smart Profits Report:</p>
<blockquote><p>‘Tis the season to… well, spend. And in a credit-oriented nation, Americans again proved that they do that better than the rest. The National Retail Federation (NRF) says 172 million consumers hit the malls or logged on to buy goods over the extended Thanksgiving weekend &#8211; a 17% jump from the same period in 2007. And ShopperTrak says “Black Friday” sales rose 3% to $10.6 billion over “B.F. 2007,” with the average consumer spending $372 &#8211; up 7.2% from a year ago.</p>
<p>Granted, a 3% sales rise isn’t spectacular, but it’s not terrible for a nation with a pathetic savings rate, a 3.7% year-over-year inflation rate in October, and 1.2 million job losses. I’m sure America’s battered banks are wondering exactly where these guys are getting their money from &#8211; and whether they can pay it back.</p>
<p>Retailers are doing their best to help &#8211; and potentially at their own expense…</p>
<h3>The Retail Sector’s Vicious Cycle</h3>
<p>Many still predict a rough time for retailers, with the NRF predicting a measly 2.2% rise in holiday shopping sales &#8211; the lowest since 2002. Retailers are compelled to offer eye-popping deals to cash-strapped consumers, but they can’t sustain the bargains forever, for risk of eroding their profit margins too much.</p>
<p>That could result in flat sales and profit growth, with some analysts suggesting that it could also lead to more bankruptcies, following electronics giant <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=CircuitCity">Circuit City</a>, <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=729810">Linens n’ Things</a>, and <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=OTC:SHRPQ">The Sharper Image</a>. In turn, that could drive unemployment even higher.</p>
<p>Already, a major online trend is providing some clues…</p>
<p><strong>When High Traffic Meets Falling Sales</strong></p>
<p>The good news: Online traffic on “Cyber Monday” (the Monday following Thanksgiving, which traditionally kicks off the online shopping season) climbed by 10% over the same day in 2007, according to Pricegrabber.com. Other firms have also reported heavy activity, with <strong>Target</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=target">TGT</a>) expecting its web traffic to jump 40% this season.</p>
<p>The bad news: Online research firm comScore says web sales are down 4% so far this season and will remain the same as last year throughout the November-December compared at $29.2 billion. That’s prime evidence that deep discounts could squash profit margins. But essentially, retailers have little choice.</p>
<p>But what choices do investors have?</p>
<h3>“It’s Wal-Mart Time”</h3>
<p>A few weeks ago, my colleague Marc Lichtenfeld gave you <a href="http://www.smartprofitsreport.com/archives/2008/profit-from-the-retail-sector.html">three companies that could be set to buck the gloomy retail trend this season.</a></p>
<p>One of them was sector bellwether <strong>Wal-Mart</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=wmt">WMT</a>), whose CEO Lee Scott proudly proclaims, “It’s Wal-Mart time. This is the kind of environment that Sam Walton built this company for.”</p>
<p>He’s right. As consumers go all-out to dig up value, Wal-Mart is among those discount-oriented firms set up to not only weather this season’s storm, but to profit from it. Check out <a href="http://www.smartprofitsreport.com/archives/2008/profit-from-the-retail-sector.html">Marc’s article</a> for more details, plus his thoughts on <strong>Kohl’s</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=kss">KSS</a>) and <strong>Dollar Tree</strong> (Nasdaq: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=DollarTree">DLTR</a>).</p>
<p>I’m going to throw another one into the mix &#8211; <strong>The TJX Companies</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=TJX">TJX</a>) &#8211; a company <a href="http://www.smartprofitsreport.com/archives/2007/black-friday475.html">I actually highlighted here a year ago</a>…</p>
<h3>The Outlook For TJX</h3>
<p>At the time, the stock traded around $28.50 and bounced to $32 by early February 2008, followed by a 52-week high of $37.52 in August.</p>
<p>Since then, however, shares have sunk back to the $20 area, as a combination of high oil prices at the time stifled consumer spending, while the U.S. dollar (the company also operates overseas, including Britain and Ireland), economy and stock market slumped.</p>
<p>Despite this, though, the firm reported a 4% and 3% sales rise in August and September respectively, compared with August-September 2007. That’s a testament to its business model &#8211; the company offers fashionable, quality goods (some of which it buys from other higher-end retailers’ excess inventory) at attractive prices.</p>
<p>However, total third quarter profit came in at $235.8 million ($0.54 per share), compared with $249.5 million ($0.54 per share) in Q3 2007 &#8211; a 5.5% drop, due to the negative economic climate and an exchange rate hit. Over the first nine months of 2008, though, TJX earned $629.9 million ($1.42 per share) over the $470.6 million ($1.00 per share) from January-September 2007.</p>
<p>TJX pegs fourth quarter EPS between $0.58 and $0.62 &#8211; lower than the $0.67 in Q4 2007 and the $0.72 estimates, but $2.07 to $2.11 per share in fiscal 2009, compared with $1.68 for this year.</p>
<p>Also, the company’s T.J. Maxx and Marshall’s stores could be prominent destinations for bargain-hunting shoppers this season. The fact that <strong>The Gap</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=gps">GPS</a>) posted better than expected third quarter results could bode well for TJX. Other positive factors include the U.S. dollar strengthening a little and Card Activation Technologies settling its litigation against TJX.</p>
<p>Ultimately, fourth-quarter retail earnings will tell the full story of this holiday period</p>
<p>And while the overall gloom shrouding the retail sector could drag successful, bargain-oriented companies down with the pack in the short-term, provided their business models lure in discount-hungry consumers this season, they could end up having the final word.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.smartprofitsreport.com/archives/2008/us-economy.html">Source: Tune Out The Retail Doomsayers… These Firms Could Bust This Season’s Trend</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/4-low-end-retailers-to-dodge-sector-slump/9509/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How This Crisis Could Make You A Fortune</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/how-this-crisis-could-make-you-a-fortune/8102</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/how-this-crisis-could-make-you-a-fortune/8102#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shah Gilani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Downturn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JWN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEHMQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shah Gilani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock bargains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TGT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Neiman Marcus Group Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US housing crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Jobless Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=8102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By all reasonable measures, we are already in a recession, says <strong>Shah Gilani</strong>. Deflation has become today&#8217;s number one threat. But massive government rescues mean another bout of inflation looms on the horizon. Shah says investors should look to short vulnerable stocks in 2009. But in 12-18 months, they should be prepared for a &#8220;generational opportunity&#8221; to make a fortune.</p>
<p>This from <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links">Money Morning</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>If there’s a proverb that captures the outlook for the U.S. economy in the New Year, it’s the one that says: “It’s always darkest before the dawn.”</p>
<p>Regardless of any formal announcement of whether or not the United States drops into an actual recession, the ongoing credit crisis guarantees a contraction of the American economy by virtually every measure&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By all reasonable measures, we are already in a recession, says <strong>Shah Gilani</strong>. Deflation has become today&#8217;s number one threat. But massive government rescues mean another bout of inflation looms on the horizon. Shah says investors should look to short vulnerable stocks in 2009. But in 12-18 months, they should be prepared for a &#8220;generational opportunity&#8221; to make a fortune.</p>
<p>This from <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links">Money Morning</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>If there’s a proverb that captures the outlook for the U.S. economy in the New Year, it’s the one that says: “It’s always darkest before the dawn.”</p>
<p>Regardless of any formal announcement of whether or not the United States drops into an actual recession, the ongoing credit crisis guarantees a contraction of the American economy by virtually every measure we know. That period of darkness will be marked by a dramatic slowdown in economic activity, as well as by rising unemployment, additional declines in U.S. stock prices, and constant volatility. It could last as long as 12-18 months.</p>
<p>But when the dawn does come, it will be one to remember. If U.S. President-elect Barack Obama gets it right – and I have every reason to believe that he will – then investors will be presented with the greatest investment opportunity of our generation. At that point, shares of American companies will be at such low levels that wholesale buying by individuals, mutual funds, pension funds, institutional money managers, and foreign-controlled sovereign wealth funds, will generate gains that will not only make us whole, they will make us rich once again.</p>
<p><strong>The Recipe for a Recession</strong></p>
<p>Whether or not the United States  is technically in a recession ultimately will be divined by the <a href="http://www.nber.org/">National Bureau of Economic Research</a> (NBER).  The business-cycle dating committee of this privately run, nonprofit economic  research group <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=5b2a1b8a6b684e7988b9c5bdd893b081&amp;siteid=nwhpm&amp;sguid=KutBgB74bkqGZ7oUpERU9A">is  right now studying five factors in an attempt to determine if the United States  has entered a recession</a> and, if so, when that downturn started, <strong><em>MarketWatch.com</em></strong> reported. Those five factors are:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Gross Domestic Product (GDP).</li>
<li>Industrial production.</li>
<li>Employment</li>
<li>Income.</li>
<li>Retail sales.</li>
</ul>
<p>Regardless of any formal announcement by the NBER of whether we’re in a recession, the credit crisis guarantees a general contraction of economic activity, by every measure.</p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/07/news/economy/karydakis_jobs.fortune/?postversion=2008110715">“Any doubt that we’re officially in a  recession can be put aside,”</a> Anthony Karydakis, former chief U.S.  economist for JPMorgan Asset Management (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=jpm">JPM</a>) – and now a professor  at New York University’s Stern School of Business – recently wrote in <strong><em>Fortune</em></strong> magazine. “The rapid deterioration of labor markets points to a sharp decline in hours worked and output in the fourth quarter. This is likely to lead to a decline in personal consumption to the tune of 5.0% or so for that period. Since [consumer spending] makes up about 70% of the economy, the stage has already been set for real GDP to shrink at a more than 4.0% rate in the fourth quarter.”</p>
<p>Confirmation of that  belief is evident by looking at each of the NBER’s five key indicators.</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Gross       Domestic Product (GDP)</strong>: The U.S. Commerce Department estimated that the U.S. economy, as measured by GDP, rose 0.9% in the first quarter. In the second quarter, GDP advanced an estimated 2.8%. For the third quarter, GDP declined an estimated 0.3%. <strong>My own econometric models suggest that GDP actually contracted at a 1.5% pace in the third quarter and will decline another 2.75% in the fourth quarter</strong>. For the year, that would mean the U.S. economy actually fell 0.55%. The U.S. economy last posted a full year’s negative GDP in 1991, when it declined 0.2%. <strong>Verdict: Recession</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>Industrial       Production</strong>: This measure of output by the nation’s factories and mines dropped 2.8% in September, and a very steep 6.0% in the third quarter. <strong>Verdict: Recession.</strong></li>
<li><strong>Employment</strong>: The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics announced Friday that October’s unemployment rate was 6.5%, a jump of 0.4%, which was double what most economists expected, and also its highest level in 14 years. The economy has now lost a total of 1.2 million jobs since the beginning of the year, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/07/news/economy/karydakis_jobs.fortune/?postversion=2008110715">with nearly half of those losses       occurring in the last three months alone</a>, pointing to an acceleration in the pace of erosion in labor markets. Karydakis, the Stern School professor, wrote in <strong><em>Fortune</em></strong>: “By way of comparison, during the 2001 recession and in the sluggish growth that followed in 2002-03, the unemployment rate reached a peak of only 6.3%, in June 2003. We’ve already exceeded that mark and, given that we are still in the early phase of the current recession, the unemployment rate should be expected to push toward the 7.5% range – and possibly higher – during the next three months to six months.”<strong> Verdict: Recession.</strong></li>
<li><strong>Income</strong>: Personal income increased $24.5 billion, or 0.2%, and disposable personal income (DPI) increased $25.7 billion, or 0.2%, in September. <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/pce.asp">Personal consumption       expenditures</a> (PCE) decreased $33.6 billion, or 0.3%. Excluding the       rebate payments made to U.S. taxpayers under the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_Stimulus_Act_of_2008">Economic       Stimulus Act of 2008</a>, DPI increased $30.3 billion, or 0.3%, in       September, and increased $44.0 billion, or 0.4%, in August. <strong>Verdict:       Too close to call</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>Retail       Sales</strong>: October retail sales are coming in well below already-diminished expectations, and some reports have been downright depressing – including <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=3942017">The Neiman Marcus       Group Inc</a>. -26.8%; <strong>The Gap Inc</strong>. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGPS">GPS</a>) –16%; <strong>The       Nordstrom Group </strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AJWN">JWN</a>)       -15.7%; <strong>J.C. Penny Co. Inc.</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=jcp">JCP</a>) -13%; <strong>Kohl’s Corp.</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AKSS">KSS</a>)       -9%;  <strong>Ltd. Brands Inc. </strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ltd">LTD</a>) -9%; <strong>Target Corp.       Inc.</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=tgt">TGT</a>) -4.8%;       and <strong>Wal-Mart Stores Inc.</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=wmt">WMT</a>)       +2.4%. In a report last week, <strong>Moody’s Investors Service</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mco">MCO</a>) projected that the retail sector’s woes will continue into 2009 as consumers cut back on buying apparel, footwear and accessories “in order to save money for essentials.” The credit rating firm said in a separate report that holiday spending “will prove even weaker than expected,” amid October’s financial-market swoon. <strong>Verdict: Recession.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>If U.S. exports are taken out of the GDP calculations going back to January, it’s apparent that there has been very little domestic growth in the economy. And when revisions are finalized in the next few months, we’ll be looking back at the recession that we’re all but certain is upon us right now. Until the credit markets are freed up and borrowers are extended credit at reasonable rates, it’s unlikely that credit, the centerpiece of the economy, will be anything other than a major cog in the wheel.</p>
<p>There are some signs of a thaw,  but not anytime soon. The <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/10/federal-funds-target-rate/">U.S.  Federal Reserve’s lowering</a> of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_funds_rate" target="_blank">Fed  Funds target rate</a> to 1.0%, and coordinated rate reductions by the Bank of England and the European Central Bank, as well as other major world-wide central banks, may start to ease the stranglehold gripping the worldwide credit markets. The <a href="file:///H:/Money%20Morning%20News%20Story%20Files%20%28Week%20Ending%20Nov.%2014,%202008%29/London%20Interbank%20Offered%20Rate,">London  interbank offered rate</a> (Libor), a critical interest rate against which  trillions of dollars of mortgages, bank loans and derivatives are priced, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/23/mortgage-re-sets/">dropped to 2.39%  last week</a> from a high of 4.82% on Oct. 10.</p>
<p>The prospect of President-elect Obama’s choosing a different means of attacking the credit crisis will be closely watched and, by itself, may create an air of confidence that perceptions will change. But changed perceptions will not be enough.<br />
The truth about our economic outlook is that it is predicated on demonstrably better transparency. If U.S. banks follow the lead of their European counterparts, which <a href="http://www.iasplus.com/europe/0811ec.pdf">have recently been freed from  fair-value, mark-to-market accounting</a>, and which may retroactively mark assets to “internal models” back to July, then balance-sheet clarity will continue to be cloaked in darkness. Lack of confidence in the banking system will persist, especially among the banks themselves. The first order of attack needs to be the creation of a fundamental leadership position that leads to an open, transparent and accountable measure of balance sheet assets and liabilities. As long as failing banks are being propped up, this cycle of credit contraction will persist.</p>
<p>The outlook for the economy is inextricably tied to the price of oil. The run-up of benchmark crude this summer to the record $145 a barrel level, and its subsequent fall to half that level, has wreaked havoc throughout the economy. Similarly, the run-up in commodity prices, and their subsequent fall, also has caused a lot of damage. Together, the dramatic rise and fall in the pricde of oil and other commodities is a harbinger of greater volatility in the future.</p>
<h3>Follow the Money</h3>
<p>Follow the money. Capital rapidly inflated the tech-stock bubble. When that bubble burst, capital flowed into and flooded the hard-asset world of real estate. When that bubble burst fast, speculative money dove into oil and commodities. When the U.S. and world economies looked weak, those bubbles burst. The looming threat of inflation this past summer instantly gave way after the drop of oil, gold, metals and agricultural commodities. And now, <em>deflation</em> is seen as the looming  threat on the horizon.</p>
<p>Which threat should we worry about?</p>
<p>The answer is – both. The prospect for near-term deflation seems all too real. As raw material prices fall and finished good prices fall due to a lack of purchasing power resulting from lack of credit and world-wide recessionary fears, the U.S. consumer has fundamentally changed his or her collective psychology. Is U.S. consumerism, which is responsible for 70% of GDP, in full retreat? If it is, as all measures project, then it’s likely that government stimulus efforts will overshoot their intended mark.<br />
Just look at what the United  States has done already as it battles this financial crisis. It has:</p>
<ul>
<li>Handed out  more than $150 billion in stimulus rebate checks.</li>
<li>Floated a  $700 billion financial bailout rescue plan – almost $160 billion of which has  already been placed.</li>
<li>Bailed out  American International Group Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=aig">AIG</a>), to the tune of $125  billion.</li>
<li>Covered JP  Morgan Chase &amp; Co.’s bet on taking over <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=The+Bear+Stearns+Cos">The Bear  Stearns Cos</a>. – to the tune of $29 billion.</li>
<li>Looked to <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/11/04/big-three/">lend struggling  automakers</a> $25 billion.</li>
<li>Agreed to  guarantee depositors at all banks.</li>
<li>Stepped in  to buy commercial paper that no one else will buy.</li>
<li>Guaranteed  money-market-fund investors.</li>
<li>And  backstopped the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), Fannie Mae (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=fnm">FNM</a>) and Freddie Mac (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=fre">FRE</a>).</li>
</ul>
<p>And now we’re getting wind of another stimulus package and more  help for everyone.</p>
<p>If, in six months to a year, the credit markets are facilitating borrowers again, the massive buildup of U.S. debt will result in a falling dollar and higher interest rates.</p>
<p>That spells inflation.</p>
<p>A massive re-inflation of the economy portends another flood of speculative money into oil and commodities. The cycles are increasingly condensed, more volatile and will be increasingly more disruptive.</p>
<p>Welcome to the brave new world of  global finance and speculation.</p>
<p>The Federal Reserve’s balance sheet has ballooned from $900 billion to more than $1.8 trillion. That’s 13% of GDP. The Treasury Department has telegraphed <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/11/05/700-billion-banking-bailout/">its intention to float $550 billion of debt in the fourth quarter and estimates it will have to float another $368 billion in the first quarter of 2009</a>. Our  national debt will then be close to 49% of GDP.</p>
<p>If there is an easing of credit in the economy, and borrowers come to market with the pent-up demand that has not been met for the past year, the competition for funds will raise interest rates. Higher interest rates will counter any stimulus effect from government programs.</p>
<p>Who will buy U.S. Treasury debt if the world is less apprehensive about credit quality? Lenders will once again seek higher returns, potentially forcing the Treasury Department to increase its rates. The potential of this event may sink the dollar if investors perceive that the U.S. economy is stagnant and the world is awash in dollars. The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yield_curve">yield curve</a> – the spread between the Treasury’s two-year and the 10-year paper – has been steepening. A steepening yield curve, where short-term borrowing costs are low and long-term rates considerably higher, is good for banks that borrow short and lend long.</p>
<p>But if the perception of risk  diminishes, and the perception of future inflation increases, the <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/invertedyieldcurve.asp">yield curve  will invert</a> and the threat of rising rates will cause a sell-off in the short end of the curve and a rush into longer-dated maturities. Any increase in short-term interest rates would be painful for struggling banks. An <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/invertedyieldcurve.asp">inverted  yield curv</a>e would be devastating, and inevitably would lead to more bank  failures.</p>
<h3>Always a Silver Lining – My  Forecast</h3>
<p>The outlook for the economy is not rosy – and that’s an understatement. But there is a silver lining. Even in the near term, the stock market will present innumerable wealth-creation opportunities.</p>
<ul>
<li>First, there  are plenty of shorting opportunities out there now, and more will present  themselves in the future.</li>
<li>Second, in due course – in perhaps 12-18 months – we will be presented with the investment opportunity of our generation. If President-elect Obama gets it right, and I believe he’s got the potential to bring us all together and get the country through this (and if you’re reading this Mr. President-elect, I’d like to put in my vote for [New York Fed President] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Geithner">Timothy Geithner</a> as next U.S. treasury secretary), American companies will be able to be purchased so cheaply that fortunes will be made. The recovery will not only make us whole, it will make our people and our nation rich again.</li>
</ul>
<p>I have absolutely no doubt that the United States will lead the world back into balance. The sea change that has arrived is the result of the conservative experiment having lost its true moorings, pushing the economy into disaster. Not that a wholesale swinging of the pendulum to the other side would be good. In fact, it would be disastrous. We have the potential to end up with a new, fair, transparent and judiciously regulated environment where capital formation can again spread its wings and the U.S. economy can fly.</p>
<p>There are new hands reaching into the colorful box of beads that comprise the American landscape and economy. From any human perspective, the United States is more than a microcosm of the universe; it is the center of the world as we know it. It will take time to construct the new mandala. We all need to meditate on the process to ensure that the design we embrace will ultimately be inclusive, forward-looking and – like all great art – an inspiration to all who view it.</p></blockquote>
<p>PS. This is a cut-down version of the original Money Morning article, which can be read by clikcing the link below.</p>
<p><a class="titleref" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/11/10/recession/">Source: For the U.S. Economy in the New Year, the Pain Will  Precede the Promise</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/how-this-crisis-could-make-you-a-fortune/8102/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 3.125 seconds -->
