Martin Hutchinson (Money Morning):

U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke’s latest thesis is that the home mortgage bubble had little to do with record low interest rates, and was actually much more a problem of regulation.

It sounds plausible – until you give it some real thought. After all, I believe that humanity has already tried a system with tight, vigorously enforced regulations, and no price mechanism.

It was called the Soviet Union.

Okay, that was a bit of a cheap shot – to some extent. Bernanke stated that “borrowers chose and were extended mortgages that they could not be expected to service over the longer term.” That appears to make the problem one of regulation: The types of mortgages that banks should be permitted to offer should be limited to ones that borrowers have a reasonable chance of servicing.

In theory this makes sense. However, it is a prime example of what I in the past have referred to as the “Keynesian Bureaucrat Fallacy,” or KBF.

Under the KBF, wise bureaucrats – who, like economist John Maynard Keynes, were presumably educated at Cambridge and steeped in the traditions of the Bloomsbury Group – will decide the appropriate regulations for every sphere of the economy.

They will then enforce them with draconian rigor, forcing the economy to behave in a way that optimizes economic welfare, measured by whatever means the bureaucrats devise. Irrational market-based signals – such as the price mechanism, will be ignored – unless the bureaucrats decide it is safe to take account of them.  . .

Click here for the rest of Mr. Hutchinson’s commentary on Money Morning.

Baltimore — (TFN): Well, look at that. There are consequences for our actions. Even in this day and age when it is virtually illegal to step on your neighbor’s toes or wish the corner beggar a Merry Christmas, we are still held responsible for our wrongdoings.

Just ask Balloon Boy’s old man. The trickster just got sentenced to ninety days in jail, with two thirds of the time allocated to a work release program. But even better than his time defending himself from shivs and bathroom sneak attacks is the four-year time span in which it is illegal for him to profit from his eye-popping stunt.

So long book deal. In four years, it will be Balloon Boy? Who?

I wish there was similar legislation for the folks in Washington, some sort of law that banned rule makers and regulators from profiting from their own outrageous stunts.

Chances are folks like Pelosi, Reid, Geithner and Bernanke would be out of a job.

After last week’s close-call confirmation vote in the Senate, many pundits are saying Bernanke should be out of a job regardless of the law.

I have a feeling the position is shared by Oliver Garrett, the CEO of Casey Research.

Read what he just sent me and you be the judge:

Ben Bernanke is a dubious choice to be named “Person of the Year” by Time magazine.  While Time’s Managing Editor Richard Stengel credits him with recognizing early and reacting appropriately to the ongoing financial crisis, in reality, he was wrong time and again with both his predictions and his remedies.

Just remember these gems:

•    On July 1, 2005, Bernanke stated without hesitation that we were not experiencing a housing bubble: “I think what is more likely is that house prices will slow, maybe stabilize, might slow consumption spending a bit.”

•    November 2005, on derivatives: “With respect to their safety, derivatives, for the most part, are traded among very sophisticated financial institutions and individuals who have considerable incentive to understand them and to use them properly.” And “the Federal Reserve’s responsibility is to make sure that the institutions it regulates have good systems and good procedures for ensuring that their derivatives portfolios are well managed and do not create excessive risk in their institutions.”

•    February 15, 2006: “Housing markets are cooling a bit. Our expectation is that the decline in activity or the slowing in activity will be moderate, that house prices will probably continue to rise.”

•    February 2008: “I expect there will be some failures of smaller banks” (Bear Stearns collapsed a couple of weeks later).

•    But then again, I guess in regards to his nomination we are talking about achievements in 2009. That was the year Bernanke said, “Currently, we don’t think [the unemployment rate] will get to 10 percent.”

This is the same chairman of the Federal Reserve who told us that Fannie and Freddie were “adequately capitalized” and “in no danger of failing.”

Unfortunately, he has not just been wrong about housing, unemployment, banking, and derivatives — his policies have directly contributed to all of the problems we now face.

High unemployment and the weak dollar threaten to further undermine our economy, yet his policy is to just keep borrowing.

The massive debt his policies have foisted on the American taxpayer is weakening the U.S.’s position as global economic leader and hurting already tenuous relations with foreign governments.

Bernanke has supported the policies of Greenspan and our current and previous administrations – the very policies that got us into this mess.  He has supported the leveraging of the American economy to rescue companies long past saving and the borrowing of billions from foreign governments to line the pockets of corrupt investment bankers.

I could recommend a few alternative names for runner-up, if Time’s criteria are really as dubious as they appear:

•    Lloyd Blankfein from Goldman Sachs for robbing taxpayers legally

•    Rick Wagoner of GM for taking the world’s largest car maker to bankruptcy in a quarter-century

•    Tim Geithner for ensuring that all of our bankers prospered during the worst financial crisis since the ‘30s

•    Tiger Woods for providing the nation with great dinner conversations and helping to spur tabloid sales.

Bernanke is insistent on using inflation to make our personal debts seem small, all the while setting the country up for a much larger disaster long term. Bernanke is borrowing from Peter to pay Paul… and robbing taxpayers to pay Peter.

As you may have noticed, the government will not save you from the reverberations of a declining U.S. economy. You’ll have to take matters into your own hands… and no one is better at pointing the way than the editors of The Casey Report.

No matter how dire the economic trend, double- or triple-digit gains within 12 to 24 months are easy if you discover the right opportunities to profit. Find out more by clicking here.

*** That’s it for this week. The TFN offices are closed tomorrow and Friday for the holidays and I’ll be spending the days with friends and family.

Even if you are not a fan of Christmas and all it stands for, my wish for you is to at least share in some of the pleasantries and delights of the season. There are far too many folks that won’t be able to this year.

Olivier Garrett (Casey Research):

Ben Bernanke is a dubious choice to be named “Person of the Year” by Time magazine.  While Time’s Managing Editor Richard Stengel credits him with recognizing early and reacting appropriately to the ongoing financial crisis, in reality, he was wrong time and again with both his predictions and his remedies. Just remember these gems:

• On July 1, 2005, Bernanke stated without hesitation that we were not experiencing a housing bubble: “I think what is more likely is that house prices will slow, maybe stabilize, might slow consumption spending a bit.”
• November 2005, on derivatives: “With respect to their safety, derivatives, for the most part, are traded among very sophisticated financial institutions and individuals who have considerable incentive to understand them and to use them properly.” And “the Federal Reserve’s responsibility is to make sure that the institutions it regulates have good systems and good procedures for ensuring that their derivatives portfolios are well managed and do not create excessive risk in their institutions.”
• February 15, 2006: “Housing markets are cooling a bit. Our expectation is that the decline in activity or the slowing in activity will be moderate, that house prices will probably continue to rise.”
• February 2008: “I expect there will be some failures of smaller banks” (Bear Stearns collapsed a couple of weeks later).
• But then again, I guess in regards to his nomination we are talking about achievements in 2009. That was the year Bernanke said, “Currently, we don’t think [the unemployment rate] will get to 10 percent.”

This is the same chairman of the Federal Reserve who told us that Fannie and Freddie were “adequately capitalized” and “in no danger of failing.”  

Unfortunately, he has not just been wrong about housing, unemployment, banking, and derivatives — his policies have directly contributed to all of the problems we now face.

High unemployment and the weak dollar threaten to further undermine our economy, yet his policy is to just keep borrowing. The massive debt his policies have foisted on the American taxpayer is weakening the U.S.’s position as global economic leader and hurting already tenuous relations with foreign governments. Bernanke has supported the policies of Greenspan and our current and previous administrations – the very policies that got us into this mess.  He has supported the leveraging of the American economy to rescue companies long past saving and the  borrowing of billions from foreign governments to line the pockets of corrupt investment bankers. 

I could recommend a few alternative names for runner-up, if Time’s criteria are really as dubious as they appear:

• Lloyd Blankfein from Goldman Sachs for robbing taxpayers legally
• Rick Wagoner of GM for taking the world’s largest car maker to bankruptcy in a quarter-century
• Tim Geithner for ensuring that all of our bankers prospered during the worst financial crisis since the ‘30s
• Tiger Woods for providing the nation with great dinner conversations and helping to spur tabloid sales.

Bernanke is insistent on using inflation to make our personal debts seem small, all the while setting the country up for a much larger disaster long term. Bernanke is borrowing from Peter to pay Paul… and robbing taxpayers to pay Peter. 

As you may have noticed, the government will not save you from the reverberations of a declining U.S. economy. You’ll have to take matters into your own hands… and no one is better at pointing the way than the editors of The Casey Report. No matter how dire the economic trend, double- or triple-digit gains within 12 to 24 months are easy if you discover the right opportunities to profit. Find out more by clicking here.

Baltimore — (TFN): You don’t believe all the hype do you? As we close out another year and another decade, the pundits are busy rehashing the action of the past ten years.

The political types are discussing the rise and fall of the Bush administration, a couple of wars and the nation’s first black president. The Hollywood folks are talking about the end of the sitcom, the death of an icon and the phenomenon that is American Idol.

And, of course, the financial types are talking about the decade that never happened. You know, the fact that at the start of the decade, the Dow was actually worth more than it is today.

Sure, if you happened to be the poor sap that bought the Dow on January 1, 2000 and held it until today, you’d be down about 9.5%. But I’m willing to bet that is not you.

As a contrarian investor, you are more likely to be holding a pile of gold. In that case, you are sitting on gains of about 300% over the past decade.

But again, I don’t think that is you, at least not entirely. If you are anything like me, you are sitting back, wondering if the next decade is going to be as good as the last.

Think about it. We had high interest rates, record low rates, a housing bubble, a tech bubble, record high oil prices, ultra-low natural gas prices, a couple of wars and the biggest government bailout you could ever imagine.

If you can’t make money in that kind of environment, you flat-out aren’t trying. Even if you racked up 300% gains from gold, you could have and should have done better.

The only thing the last decade proved was buy-and-hold investing is dead. But that’s why we have exchanges, so you can buy and sell assets when the mood strikes.

If you were a true contrarian investor – bought when nobody else was buying and sold when nobody else was selling – you probably just locked in monstrous gains on gold, you are rolling in cash at the moment and are looking for the just the right opportunity to hop back in.

If so, the next year and the next decade are going to treat you very, very well. If you think the last ten years was full of upside downs, wait until you see what’s in store.

Government healthcare, more bailouts, more regulations, more taxes, more government control, more investing options, more interest rate movement, more bubbles, more international exposure… the list goes on and on.

Yeah, we may be back to where we started, but it took one hell of a journey to get us here.

Take my word for it; the next ten years will be the decade for contrarians. Gold will soar. The dollar will fall and interest rates will rise. Better yet, the exact opposite will happen during calculated, short-term blips.

That means we have the kind of market active forward-thinking traders yearn for.

Now is the time to make your move. If you have been sitting on the fence, waiting for the right time, take the end of the year to approach a new starting line and join one of our three services, TFN Strategic Trader, Hot Stock Confidential or Penny Stock Confidential.

All three perfectly play the contrarian viewpoint, and better yet, as a member, you’ll never have to worry about saying, “where’d the last year go?”

You’re at the start of the best decade of your life.

*** As contrarian investors, we like hard assets, the more down and out, the better. Right now, there is no better tangible good, with a worse reputation than good ‘ole American coal. Politicians hate the stuff, factories love it and investors have yet another shot to get rich off of it.

In 2006, I was a bit of a coal industry junkie. I read books on the stuff, wrote countless articles about my research, even went on the radio, TV and the seminar circuit talking about the nation’s dirtiest fuel source.

In today’s world of “green energy” and global warming scares, coal is a nasty four-letter word. But with a couple centuries worth of the stuff buried underground, we all know that’s going to change. Come the next political campaign or environmental hype, coal will launch back into the foreground.

You know it. I know it. And the folks at Bucyrus (NYSE:BUCY) know it. That is why the heavy equipment maker is placing a $1.3 billion coal-industry bet this week.

In a move that tells Caterpillar (NYSE:CAT) and Joy Global (NYSE:JOYG) that they had better pay attention, Wisconsin-based Bucyrus is cutting a check to Terex (NYSE:TEX) in exchange for the company’s mining business.

Again, this is the kind of far-sighted, buy-when-nobody-else-will move that pays incredible dividends in upcoming years. It’s the kind of stuff contrarians dream about.

Just when the coal industry could look no worse, the sector’s biggest names move their bishops in an ever-lasting game of chess.

Today’s move is beneficial for both sides of the bargain. Terex gets a cash infusion that allows it to concentrate on its core business and Bucyrus gets a hunk of assets that allow it to up the ante versus the industry’s behemoths like Cat and Joy Global.

Here’s what you can expect out of the coal industry over the next year: more consolidation, greatly increased share price, strong demand growth, and, most importantly, better representation amongst the nation’s politicians.

Now’s the time to make your move.

*** I wish I had better news for the gold bugs. It has been dang near a month now since I said to sell the stuff and prices have gone ever since. Don’t blame me. I’m merely the messenger.

There is good news. The downturn won’t last long. It’ll be just enough to get the speculators and the hyperbolic masses off the wagon and then prices will turn north once again.

As soon as the magical metal bars are selling for less than $1050 an ounce, put in your buy orders once again. My take is we’ll see $985 by mid-January, but just in case China makes more waves between here and there, $1050 is a good entry point.

When the stuff is selling for $1250 in April and $1,500 this time next year, the cushion won’t matter so much.

…wait until you see what’s in the cards for commercial real estate.

That’s right, the next train wreck will be in commercial real estate. Couldn’t be worse than last year’s residential market crash? That remains to be seen. But it’s coming soon, probably as early as the second quarter of next year, and there’s nothing that can prevent it. The government will intervene, trying desperately to delay the day of reckoning, and may even succeed. For a while. But make no mistake about it, that train is going off the tracks no matter what.

Every part of the sector – from multifamily apartment buildings to retail shopping centers, suburban office buildings, industrial facilities, and hotels – has accumulated a huge amount of defaulted or nonperforming paper. It’s an impossible, swaying structure that cannot long stand.

Just ask Andy Miller.

Andy is one of the most knowledgeable people around when it comes to commercial real estate. Co-founder of the Miller Fishman Group of Denver, he has spent twenty years buying and developing apartment communities, shopping centers, office buildings, and warehouses throughout the country. He’s also worked extensively – especially lately – with asset managers and special servicers (those who handle commercial mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS) from insurance companies, conduits, and the biggest banks in the U.S., advising them on default scenarios, helping them develop realistic pricing structures, and making hold or sell recommendations.

It isn’t easy. Commercial real estate sales are off a staggering 82% in 2009, compared with 2008, and last year was worse than ’07. No one is selling at depressed prices, but it hardly matters as there are no buyers, either because they’re afraid of the market or can’t meet more stringent loan requirements. Two years ago, the value of all commercial real estate in the U.S. was about $6.5 trillion. Against that was laid $3-3.5 trillion in loans. The latter figure hasn’t changed much. But the former has sunk like a bar of lead in the lake, so that now between half and two-thirds of those loans will have to be written down, Andy estimates.

“If the banks had to take that hit all at once, there wouldn’t be any banks,” he says.

And it’s actually worse than that. As even average citizens became aware during the subprime meltdown, loans in recent years were bundled into exotic financial vehicles that could be sold and resold, a class generically known as conduits. These commercial mortgage-backed securities, while less well known than their cousins built upon home loans, are nonetheless ubiquitous.

Three guesses who were among the significant buyers of CMBS. If you said banks, banks, and more banks, you got it. Thus these folks are sitting not only on their own malperforming loans, but on a whole lot of everyone else’s toxic junk, too.

This is how bad conduits are: A 3% default rate last year jumped to 6% in 2009 and is expected to double again, to 12%, in 2010. An entity that takes a 12% hit to its portfolio – and this includes countless banks, pension and annuity funds, international institutional investors, and others – is in deep, deep trouble.

The real tsunami is coming, probably in the second quarter of 2010, Andy estimates. Because that’s when banks will have to start preparing for the wave of mortgages that were written near the market top and are maturing in 2011-12. Unlike home loans, commercial loans tend to be relatively short-term in nature (average 5-7 years), because – outside of apartment building loans backed by Fannie or Freddie – there are no government programs to subsidize longer-term ones. These guys mature in bunches.

According to a recent Deutsche Bank presentation, the delinquency rate on commercial loans as of the end of 2Q09 was greater than 4%. Of these, they expect that north of 70% will not qualify for refinancing. Imagine what will happen to the estimated $2 trillion in commercial mortgages that mature between now and 2013.

And even that is not the end of it. There’s a second huge wave on the way in 2015-16.

Problem is, instead of trying to meet this inevitable challenge head on, asset managers have decided to believe in such phantoms as the tooth fairy, honesty at the Fed, and an economic turnaround powerful enough to bail them all out. De Nile is not just a river in Egypt.

To be fair, it’s difficult to envision what an intelligent, aggressive response would look like, given the breadth and depth of the crisis, and the lack of resources available to deal with it. Miller recently met with a group of asset managers from a number of different, prominent banks. They reported that they’re completely overwhelmed and can’t even begin to cope with the sheer volume of problem loans on their calendar. It’s so bad that they’re now dealing with some borrowers who haven’t paid a cent in a year and a half.

What do you do if, as Andy thinks is the case, 85-90% of the entire commercial real estate market is under water relative to its financing? What happens to a property when its value drops way below the loan, a seller can’t get enough money to get out, a buyer can’t raise enough money to get in, and the bank can’t afford to foreclose? Simple. It just sits there, carried along on the bank’s books at some inflated “mark to fantasy” price that makes the institution’s balance sheet look passable. The industry even has a catchphrase for the situation: “A rolling loan gathers no moss.”

In the case of a retail store, a bankrupt tenant walks away. Andy looked at just the part of Phoenix where his firm does business and found 90 vacant big box stores, with an aggregate floor space of 8 million square feet. If Christmas season is as lackluster as cash-strapped consumers are likely to make it, there will be many others to follow.

The hotel business is terrible. Overbuilding based upon travelers who went into debt to finance lavish vacations is taking its toll on tourist destinations. At the same time, business travel has seriously contracted. Flights into Las Vegas, which caters to both, have been slashed so much that even if every seat on every remaining flight were filled and visitors stayed for an average number of days, the hotels still couldn’t break even. In industry parlance, banks are now engaged in “extend and pretend,” i.e., giving hotels three- to six-month loan extensions in the hope that things will somehow improve in the near future.

Office space is doing okay in central business districts, but not faring well elsewhere. Some estimates tab the national office vacancy rate at over 16.5%, compared with 12.6% in January 2008. It exceeds 20% in parts of Atlanta and San Diego, and in many places in between.

Multifamily apartment buildings – and the very creaky Fannie and Freddie are carrying a load of them – may be the next to topple. As values deteriorate and landlords are faced with loans coming due, there is no incentive to fix whatever goes wrong. If, for example, you have a $10 million loan maturing in two years, and the property value has declined to $6 million, why would you spend half a million to fix leaky roofs? The question answers itself. Yet, as capital spending needs are not attended to, the apartments deteriorate. Which leads to working-class tenants replaced by meth labs. Which leads to even lower property values. And so on. In the end, when the banks are forced to take possession, they will be left with either expensive repair jobs, or the cost of demolition and a total write-off.

As the overall commercial real estate crisis escalates, the banks will do the same thing they did last year: run to the government, palms outstretched.

How will Washington respond? Good question. On the one hand, further bailouts will further infuriate the public. But on the other, the political sentiment will be that allowing the banks to fail will have even more dire consequences.

The Fed has already tried to let some of the relentlessly building pressure out of the balloon through TALF (Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility). But that hasn’t worked, because TALF only backs the most senior, creditworthy bonds in a CMBS pool. Those aren’t the problem. The problem is the junior notes no one wants.

In order to increase market liquidity and get conduits moving again, the government will likely be forced to create a guarantee program similar to the FHA, Miller thinks, whereby short-term money (on the order of 5-7 years) is made available. Will that just push our problems five to seven years down the road? Quite possibly. But what is being purchased is time, the only thing left to buy. The hope, of course, is that it’s enough time – for the real estate market to stabilize, prices to return to more “normal” levels, and the world to turn all hunky dory.

Rock, meet hard place. Let all the troubled banks fail, and the consequences will range from some excruciating but short-term pain, to a plunge into full-bore depression. Prop them up with yet more newly printed fiat money, and anything from high to hyperinflation will inevitably result, along with the possibility of extending the problem well into the next decade.

Both are frightening prospects. We don’t want either, but realistically, we’re going to get one or the other. Let’s be clear, it won’t be the end of the world. However, it will be the end of the world as we know it. That makes it imperative to prepare for the new one that’s coming.

The editors of The Casey Report, supported by real estate pro Andy Miller, have been warning of the coming commercial real estate debacle since September 2008. This one’s rather easy to time – because they know when the loans will come due. And as subscribers can testify, accurately predicting big trends is the forte of Doug Casey and his expert team. To learn how you can profit from making the trend your friend, click here.

Chinese property sales are up over 60% so far this year, the nation’s National Bureau of Statistics proclaimed yesterday. That puts the housing bubble here to shame. We’ve heard a bunch of nosebleed data points come outta there in the last few weeks… check these out:

• New loan issuance has tripled in the first half of 2009, to $1.1 trillion. That’s more than half of the entire Chinese GDP over the same period.
• 95% of those loans went to state-owned enterprises or provincial entities
• The Shanghai Composite is up 79% year to date, the best major market performance in the world
• Stocks on the Shanghai Composite trade for 35.4 times earnings, double that of the MSCI Emerging Markets index
• M2 money supply rose over 28.5% in the first half of the year
• The seven largest bond sales in the world this year were domestic transactions in China.

Damn near everything is up dramatically in China in 2009… except exports. Strangely, we don’t hear a lot of concern that the backbone of their economy has contracted 23% since this time last year.

“The Chinese government realizes,” adds Dan Amoss, “that its stimulus spending and pressure on banks to expand lending is inflating a massive bubble in the Chinese stock and property markets. The problem with unsustainable economy activity is, of course, that it must eventually end.

“But for now, the Chinese have much more room to borrow and inflate than the United States (which has spent the last few decades doing so). Eventually, the market will cut them off. The end will not be pretty, and at some point in the future, shorting Chinese stocks may be one of the best short-selling opportunities in history.

“In the meantime, it makes no sense to bet against China. The Communist government has proven very efficient at stealing the resources of its people (via inflation and taxation) and channeling them into whatever infrastructure project they deem necessary.

“This process could end next week or next year.”

Dan’s keeping an eye on China, but right now his focus is on a very well-known bank on the other side of the Pacific. He believes this major financial player will soon have to cut their dividend… crushing their stock price.

Source: China Bubble Version 2.0

This has been a tough quarter for companies. Compared to last year’s second quarter, profit is down roughly 31 percent and revenue is down even more. Wall Street thought it was going to be even worse. So in one of the worst quarters ever, the market has rallied.

Investors learn all the wrong lessons from a rally like this. Nothing about it makes sense. The smallest companies are outgunning the biggest one. The most heavily shorted stocks are doing better than the least shorted stocks. The companies with the worst analyst ratings are outshining the ones with the best ratings. Everything about this rally is backwards.

Over the past 37 years – from 1972 to 2009 – these “best of breed” companies have made shareholders 2.3 times more money than the stock market as a whole. For every $100 you made from the stock market, you would have made $230 from these “best of breed” companies.

That’s not just slightly outperforming the market. That’s lapping the market and then some. And it’s even more impressive when you take into account everything this period covered. It’s been an eventful 37 years of embargoes, stagflation, a savings & loan crisis, an Asian economic crisis, a Russian national debt default, a near collapse of the Mexican peso, 9/11, two gulf wars, the bankruptcy of the Long-Term Capital Management hedge fund, the dotcom rise and fall, a bursting of the housing bubble, credit bubble and spending bubble. Forgive me if I’ve left some “minor stuff” out like the fall of the “Iron Curtain” and the rise of China.

Through all this, these companies gave their shareholders a steady and rising stream of revenue and a return that, as I’ve said, was more than 2.3 times what the markets gave. Who wouldn’t want that?

Everybody would. And that’s a big problem for all those mutual funds which don’t touch these companies … and for the hyper-active Wall Street press which makes a fuss over a dozen things every day but somehow misses the biggest story of all…

The existence of a class of companies which know how to put ever-increasing amounts of cash into the pockets of their shareholders, year in and year out, decade in and decade out.

Almost as bizarre as our junk rally are dividend-paying companies that can do no wrong. The ones strong enough and confident enough to raise dividends are going up in price. And the ones that are cutting dividends? Many of them are going up too.

Shareholders have recently been accepting smaller checks without protest and without selling their shares. They are evidently willing to take the hit today so the company can grow profits tomorrow. It’s easier to do when investors think that some kind of recovery is around the corner. If that recovery doesn’t materialize, these shareholders will be showing much less forgiveness to dividend cutters. I don’t want to own these companies when that happens.

If I were an investor in any of those companies, I’d sell my shares right away. The whole point of investing in the “best of breed” companies is that you get paid no matter what.

Everybody is cutting costs, the strong and weak companies alike. But not all dividend companies are cutting their dividends. Just slightly more than half are these days. It pays to invest in the dividend hikers, not so with the cutters. Let other investors be forced to rely on a recovery to reverse their portfolio losses.

You should be and can be making money even if the economy remains weak. As long as there are “best of breed” companies still raising their dividends, there’s no reason why you should sacrifice your pay “for the good of the company.”

The scary thing (for us and the Fed) is that low-interest rates aren’t speeding up the recovery. People aren’t willing to borrow. And banks aren’t willing to lend. The amount of money floating around the economy is pretty stagnant. The Fed should be pretty discouraged. They have $2 trillion on their balance sheet. And all they have to show for it are some banks which should have gone under but are instead giving its employees million-dollar bonuses.

Dividend companies are getting a little respect again. They may even have become the “new fad” according to the UK’s Telegraph. Here’s the money quote…

Few professional investors are banking on a return to the super-charged capital gains we have seen from equities in the past. Rather, the new fad is for companies capable of delivering reliable sources of income. Historically, dividends have been responsible for more than half the return on equities. In the more risk-averse environment which is the new norm it may be rather more than that.

But why be satisfied with just a “reliable source of income” when you could get income which is both reliable and growing. Perhaps the Telegraph doesn’t realize that with “best of breed” companies, you can have your cake and eat it too. But the Telegraph isn’t the only newspaper or media outlet that doesn’t “get it.”

Nobody is talking about these companies providing reliable revenue to shareholders for decades (yes, I said decades) and increasing their dividends at rates of 25-40 percent every year. Yes, I said 25-40 percent every year.

Do the math. A company raising its cash payments to you by 25 percent every year will double the money it pays you every three years! If you’re getting $10,000 in cash every year from a company now, in six years you’ll be getting $40,000.

These aren’t junk bonds. They’re not risky derivatives. They don’t depend on a bull market. These payments come from some of the safest and strongest companies in the market. When companies provide rising cash payments for decades and generate plenty of cash with above average profit margins, they qualify for “best of breed” status.

Actually, some people out there do “get it.” One of them is Hersh Cohen. He has managed the Legg Mason Partners Appreciation fund for the past 30 years. Over these three decades, his fund has done better than the S&P 500, the dividend-company benchmark index and the average return for large-capitalization stock funds. Cohen, who holds a doctorate in psychology, says he focuses on companies with “superior balance sheets and rising dividends.”

Cohen says his academic training helps him when the market goes to extremes. During such times he likes to go against the flow, cutting back when the market is euphoric and increasing his bets when others panic “and stuff is being given away.”

I’m not a fan of mutual funds. I think they’re terrible instruments, trapping investors into very narrow styles of investment long past the time when those styles made a buck. And I don’t think mutual fund managers are the sharpest tools in the investment shed. So when I see an exception, I try to point him out. Cohen is an exception.

If you’re interested in doubling your money every three years with very little risk, there’s only one way to do it. Invest in “best of breed” companies.

To your investing success,
Andrew

Source: Why ‘Best of Breed’ Investing Is No Passing Fad

“[We] must control the risk of real estate loans,” said a mystery banker. “In the first half of the year, our country’s banking loans expanded rapidly… but the loans growth has led to accumulated risks also increasing.” Our man of the moment said his banking sector had become “not prudent and impulsive” in issuing loans for new housing projects, many of which have falsified their capital levels to meet current standards. He urged lenders to “strengthen risk management” right way, before they loan themselves into poor credit positions.

So who is he? Robert Shiller, who just recently suggested another housing bubble could be in the mix? Or maybe some vintage Ben Bernanke, circa 2007? Nope… Liu Mingkang, the head of China’s version of the FDIC, said the above over the weekend at a conference in Beijing. China bulls take heed.

And at the risk of belaboring the obvious — he’s Chinese. We know what kind of exigency would get an American regulator to speak out against a bubble in the making. We imagine it’s far more politically dangerous for a member of the Chinese government to publicly go against the grain.
Back in America, the housing market rejoices: Housing starts climbed an unexpected 3.6% in June. According to the latest from the Commerce Department, builders broke ground on new homes at an annual rate of 582,000 in June, well above the Street’s expectations and the “best” month for housing starts since November. Curiously, single-family homes led the way, with a 14% building boom from the month before. That’s the biggest one-month gain since 2004.

Of course, this is a “signal that the housing market was improving” in June, as The New York Times suggests. But we dug up a longer-term chart of housing starts this morning that didn’t inspire as much confidence. Starts may have come up from the deep blue abyss, but we’re yet to emerge from uncharted waters

And who says more housing starts are a good thing? We may be market simpletons, but we’re under the impression home prices are falling because demand is exceptionally weak and supply is exceptionally high. So explain to us again how adding more inventory to the 3.8 million existing homes on the market helps stop the bleeding.
Over 1.53 million homeowners were in the foreclosure process in the first half of 2009. That’s an all-time high, said RealtyTrac late last week — and up 9% from the last half of 2008 and up 15% from the same time last year.

Around 1.9 million individual properties are in some form of foreclosure, or one in every 84 U.S. properties. And we’re adding new homes at an annual rate of 582,000? Really, we must be missing something this morning.
The stock market is still giddy over recent earnings surprises. The S&P 500 finished last week up 7% after companies like Intel, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, IBM and Citigroup all beat earnings.

Today the market looks poised to finish in the black again. CIT, the commercial lender we discussed Friday looks like it might live to fight another day. The lender managed a last-minute debt-equity deal with bondholders that will give them another $3 billion to play with. (Look for this crisis to repeat in a couple weeks.) Still, the market has dodged a bullet, and is up about 0.5% as we write.
“In last week’s market, you could almost feel portfolio managers reacting to the prospect of missing a rally,”writes Dan Amoss, a former money manager himself. “Career risk drives many irrational investing decisions. And missing out on a rally is a cardinal sin for portfolio managers. This goes a long way toward explaining this week’s rally.

“The consensus seems to be looking for a return to something resembling the environment before the credit crisis. They’ll be waiting for a long time. Sure, there are still lots of wealthy people. But the essence of the financial crisis has to do with most consumers and businesses stretching their budgets and capital spending plans in unsustainable fashion. The next few years will reverse this trend, and we’ll continue to see economic development in emerging markets maintain pressure on commodity prices.

“Mr. Market is now testing the conviction of the bears. But through the rest of 2009, the momentum favors the bears. The stock market is far below its peak, but this is justified by long-term fundamentals. In fact, the recent rally has priced in very rosy earnings for many sectors and stocks, including our short ideas.

“Remain patient with your short positions. This rally will end soon enough, probably by the time the fourth branch of government — the mega banks — are done reporting their paper trading profits and we learn more about the bleak outlook for earnings in the real economy.”
Four more banks failed this weekend. Two in California, one in Georgia and another in South Dakota got the FDIC kibosh late Friday. That makes 57 failed financials for 2009, at an FDIC cost of over $13.4 billion.
After a long flight from Baltimore to Vancouver, we were able to move through Canadian immigration last night with relative ease, but many Czechs and Mexicans were suddenly not welcome. Just another sign of the times… the Canadian government recently legislated rules that prohibit any Mexican or Czechoslovakian from entering Canada without a visa.

Canadians say political and economic strife in both nations has caused a wave of immigrants seeking refugee status, many of which are bogus. So the Canadian government drafted the law last Monday and enacted it on Tuesday… Canadian diplomats in Mexico City have been ripping their hair out ever since:

The scrum for last-minute visas at the
Canadian embassy in Mexico City

Heh, nothing stokes a free market like sudden and severe travel restrictions.
We’re in Canada this week for our Investment Symposium (more below in the P.S.) and got a visceral reminder of the loonie’s recent strength. 98 cents to the U.S. dollar at the airport currency exchange! No thanks… we’ll wait till we stumble upon a bank.

The Canadian dollar is once again rapidly approaching parity. The ol’ loonie is officially at 90 cents today, up a full cent since Friday and about a nickel in July. Most of the loonie’s strength can be attributed to dollar weakness. Since breaking through that historic barrier at 80 last week, the dollar index has been in steady decline. It’s at 78.9 today, nearly a two-month low.
Oil’s recent stabilization has been helping out the Canadian dollar, too. Light sweet crude traded as high as $64 a barrel today, a $4 bump from last week’s low.
Gold is performing nicely as the U.S. dollar falls. The spot price is up $20 from Friday’s low, to $955 an ounce.
“The first thing to understand,” writes Mr. Byron King, “as an old geology professor at Harvard once told me, is that ‘gold is where you find it.’ And the second thing to understand is that no matter where you look, gold is hard to find — and getting harder.

“In the past decade, gold-related exploration efforts and expenditures have increased dramatically. I’ve seen numbers adding up to tens of billions of dollars poured by mining companies into gold exploration.

“But despite the best efforts of the global mining industry, world gold production has DECREASED since early in this decade. Take a look at the chart below, depicting world gold production 1850-2008.

“I love this chart. I could spend all day discussing it. For example, look at the very steep rise in gold output during the 1930s. That was during the depths of the worldwide Great Depression. In both the U.S./Canada (blue area), and the rest of the world (gray area), people were digging more and more gold. The Soviets (purple area) increased their gold output too, courtesy of Joseph Stalin and his Gulag. Desperate times call for desperate measures, I suppose. Will that sort of history repeat this time around?”

If it does, will you be ready? Check out Byron’s favorite gold plays here.
“To back up Mr. Shiller,” writes a reader in response toRobert Shiller’s call that the new wave of “cheap” homes might cause another housing bubble, “I was Skyping a friend in Phoenix last week, and they were all excited that they just bought a foreclosed home for a ‘steal,’ with an 80/20 FNMA-backed mortgage. Not five minutes later, I read the 5 article regarding that the Phoenix market is still dropping. I still don’t think that many people (my friend included) get it that prices can still drop, and that just a 10% drop wipes out almost all their equity, since they will have to pay some sort of 6% commission. I myself have seen a greater than 20% drop on my very expensive house in Atlanta, costing me hundreds of thousands of dollars.

”My wife is an agent, and she has counted three (yes, three) home sales in our area in six months. Two of them were foreclosures. The unsold homes continue to accumulate, and the market is moving toward ‘the only sale is a short sale.’ I live in Augusta, and my prayers go to my neighbor who was just transferred up to an area outside of Detroit. I can see the wealth destruction personally, and can only imagine the nationwide ramifications.”

Source:   China’s Bubble Warning, New Home Paradox, Gold Production Sea Change, Vancouver Updates and More!

REITs are still in the early stages of a huge deleveraging cycle that will last for years, which means that the REITs that concentrate on commercial real estate may be a deceptively dangerous asset class.

Our story begins with the massive credit bubble – and related housing bubble – of the last several years. These twin bubbles powered a dramatic rise in consumer spending. Some significant portion of commercial real estate sprouted up to serve and satisfy this artificial demand. From the top to bottom of the U.S. economy, easy access to credit during the last several years powered excess consumption – and a frenzy of knock-on commercial ventures.

Accordingly, shopping boutiques popped up everywhere, along with restaurants, real estate offices, home-furnishing stores, art galleries, etc. All of these enterprises unwittingly relied on credit-fueled demand, and believed that this demand was “normal.”

But now that credit has disappeared from the U.S. economy, thousands of businesses are discovering that they cannot survive the new normal – the one that relies on actual paychecks and savings, NOT credit. And so, one by one, business doors are closing and the empty commercial spaces are piling up.

“The severity of the recession is turning some malls that were once viewed as viable into potential casualties,” the Wall Street Journal recently observed. “‘Any mall that’s sitting on life support is probably going to get its plug pulled as the economy stalls,’ says Michael Glimcher, chairman and CEO of Glimcher Realty Trust, which owns 23 U.S. properties, including Eastland Mall in Charlotte.”

The distress in the commercial real estate market would be serious, even if credit were still flowing freely. But credit is contracting, which means that commercial real estate is in especially dire circumstances. Refinancing commercial properties has become an extremely difficult task. Without the ability to refinance – or to sell at a profitable level – properties will continue to stumble into foreclosure and liquidation, which will put continuous pressure on property values.

Owners of underwater properties will have to either default and hand the title over to the lender, or they’ll have to inject an impractically large amount of new equity into the property to qualify for refinancing. And in these cases, we are talking about face-to-face negotiations between borrowers and lenders. In the modern “securitized” economy, face-to-face negotiations have become as rare and quaint a concept as the corner malt shop. In the modern economy, most mortgages are sliced and diced into unrecognizable portions of various mortgage-backed securities (MBS).

Think of securitization this way: Image your pet pig ran away from home and stumbled into a sausage factory. If you searched for your pig at the end of the sausage production line, you probably couldn’t find him. He’d be there alright, but not in a form you would recognize. He is there; but he is now everywhere. So is your mortgage.

Securitization is, therefore, a very toxic aspect of this particular commercial real estate bust. Simply stated, securitized mortgage structures are not designed to function in our current environment — one with falling collateral values and soaring defaults. Let me highlight the loan restructuring challenge ahead for troubled commercial property owners and their lenders.

Take just one example of evaporating equity in commercial properties. It shows why stressed property owners cannot easily renegotiate terms with their lenders. A few weeks ago, Sunstone Hotel Investors Inc. defaulted on its mortgage on W San Diego hotel. Sunstone bought the W for $96 million in 2006. The transaction was financed by a $65 million mortgage that was sliced, diced, and sold into the commercial mortgage-backed security (CMBS) market. The W’s value is now below the face amount of the mortgage, so Sunstone will likely write its equity down to zero and turn the deed for the W (i.e., the mortgage collateral) over to creditors in order to eliminate its mortgage obligation.

Sunstone defaulted when it skipped its June 1 payment on the W hotel’s mortgage. Thus, Sunstone basically invited its servicer, Centerline Servicing, to foreclose on the hotel. Centerline represents the interests of the lenders, who are spread throughout the ownership structure of CMBS. Without the chance to renegotiate, the only real option is for lenders to foreclose and auction off collateral. Even worse, if Centerline were to approach the lenders about restructuring the mortgage, the lenders would have different objectives — some would want to liquidate collateral to get paid, while others would prefer to renegotiate and hope for a rebound in collateral value. This is known in the securitization business as “tranche warfare.”

From a legal standpoint, borrowers are too far away from ultimate lenders. The complex legal structure of CMBS practically guarantees that sensible loan restructurings, including debt-for-equity swaps, are very difficult.

Now apply this situation to hundreds of other properties around the U.S., and you can see how securitization (CMBS) practically eliminates the potential for property owners to meet with their creditors and renegotiate. Private sector creditors who want to participate in fire sales and in very attractive loans are waiting for property to fall to more reasonable levels first. Banks are not going to refinance commercial mortgages coming due on properties that are down 50% from peak values, and no equity is left. This means that the foreclosure market will dominate the overall market, pushing values for every comparable property down even more.

There will not be any legitimate bottom in the REIT market until there is a bottom in the prices of commercial real estate mortgages. The smart institutional money will initiate its investment in real estate by buying the distressed mortgages of attractive properties, NOT by buying REIT shares. These investors will want to buy claims on commercial property market that are high up in the capital structure, not gamble on equity in properties, which may be worth a fraction of peak values — or zero. That’s why I’m monitoring transactions in the commercial real estate debt markets, looking for signs of a true bottom.

The “bottom” we saw in early March was almost entirely due to the Fed’s extraordinary commitment to print money in an attempt to prop up old bubbles. This caused a temporary rally in CMBS and REITs. The most stressed REITs used this as an opportunity to de-lever their balance sheets just a smidge by flooding the market with new shares. With the window for REIT secondary offerings closing, by fall we should see another leg down in the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index.

The real buyers for CMBS and commercial property are professional investors – not the Fed or taxpayers. By and large, these professionals are waiting for bargains, with bids far below the current market.

So should you.

Source: Sell REITs