New home sales jumped almost 10% in July, while the Case-Shiller home price index rose for the second successive month. Yet luxury homebuilder Toll Brothers lost $493 million in the quarter ending July 31, considerably worse than analysts had expected.

Housing stocks are certainly acting as if a recovery must be on the way. Pulte Homes Inc. (NYSE: PHM) has more than doubled from its low. Toll Brothers Inc. (NYSE: TOL) is up around 70% from its bottom. D.R. Horton Enterprises (NYSE: DHI) is up almost four times from its bottom. Lennar Corp. (NYSE: LEN) is up about 4½ times from its low. Finally, Hovnanian Enterprises Inc. (NYSE: HOV) is up almost tenfold from its low after a flirtation with bankruptcy. Yet all of these companies are still racking up quarterly losses, according to their most recently released earnings reports.

In terms of house prices, it would seem unlikely that a bear market bottom has been reached. Yes, the average house price is now back down around its long-term average of about 3.2 times average earnings, or only a little above it. But history suggests that markets don’t bottom at their average valuation: In fact, after such a huge excess to the upside, they overshoot on the downside.

The Case-Shiller 20-cities index is still 42% above its January 2000 level, having outpaced inflation during the last 9½ years. Yet January 2000 was not the bottom of a housing depression – far from it, in fact. That was actually close to the top of the dot-com bubble, when valuations of all assets were at all-time highs. So an average price over the whole country that – even now – remains 42% above the average price recorded at the very top of a huge economic boom does not seem like a market bottom to me.

You also have to remember that the U.S. federal government is hugely subsidizing the market. Interest rates are artificially low, and the U.S. Federal Reserve has bought more than $1 trillion worth of housing debt. Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE) have been rescued by the government, and provided with more than $100 billion of taxpayer capital. And Ginnie Mae (the Government National Mortgage Association), directly a government agency, has provided almost $1 trillion of mortgages that require a 3% down payment.

And that’s not all.

The government is spending additional billions helping homeowners avoid foreclosure. First-time buyers are given a tax credit of $8,000 towards the down payment on their house – this credit currently runs out on December 1. So the current overall market bottom is propped up artificially. Even if the proposed tax-credit extension is approved, at some point, those props will be removed.

In individual cities, the picture is somewhat brighter. Phoenix and Las Vegas prices are less than 10% above their 2000 levels, having been halved from their respective peaks. In those markets, house prices may truly be reaching a bottom, although the overhang of foreclosures after such a huge drop may make recovery slow. At the other extreme, Detroit housing is 30% cheaper than in 2000, a testimony to the awful economic environment there, with the bankruptcies of General Motors Corp. (NYSE:GRM) and Chrysler Group LLC.

Again, with the government bailouts of both companies, there may be something of a recovery in the local housing market.

Probably the best prospects, however, are in Denver and Dallas, where prices are about 20% above their 2000 level, roughly in line with the increase in consumer prices during that same period. However, the local economies are strongly based on natural resources, particularly oil, whose price is triple its 2000 level. With prices in Dallas and Denver down only about 10% from their 2000 peaks, a true recovery in those cities may be near.

At the opposite extreme are the metropolitan “Big Three” of Los Angeles, New York and Washington, where prices are 61%, 71% and 74% above their 2000 levels, respectively.

Washington will be fine, of course: The Obama administration’s spending-and-legislation plans have attracted yet another huge influx of bureaucrats, lobbyists and lawyers, all of which will boost the housing market to new highs. With New York you have to worry about all the financial-services jobs being lost as a result of the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.

From a nationwide standpoint, the most likely path for the housing market is for a modest recovery, with some later slippage as subsidies are removed. Housing is likely destined to once again become a highly regional market, as it always was prior to the 2001-2006 market boom, with the cycles in each market being very different.

As for homebuilding stocks, they appear to already be discounting a recovery in their businesses that may well be years away. Selling at well above net asset value (NAV), with Price/Earnings (P/E) ratios that are infinite because the companies continue to lose money, shares of homebuilders represent a very poor value, indeed.

Source: The U.S. Housing Market’s False Dawn

The problem I have with this dogmatic definition of a bear market rally is the following: Assuming (and this isn’t a forecast, since I really haven’t the foggiest idea where stock markets will be in six or 12 months’ time) the S&P 500 moved up to 1350 and then declined to 500, as an investor should you care if the move to 1350 — a 100% gain! — was a bear market rally?

My impression is that investors’ fixation on the recent rally being a bear market rally has actually kept most investors on the sidelines and hoarding cash. Now, put yourself in the shoes of a fund manager who, in the last 18 months, has lost 50% of his clients’ money and missed the recent rally (34% for the S&P 500). What is he likely to do? I would think that he would be inclined to purchase equities as they correct the sharp advance since early March, especially as the economic news in the near term becomes less negative.

Based on our conversations with numerous managers in recent weeks, we believe that most quantitative managers’ portfolios were not positioned in expectation of a rally. Of the nearly 80 managers we have talked to, only one manager said they were up since March 9th and the clear majority admitted to being notably down or stopped out on their positions. These managers were both long-only and long-short quant managers using market neutral and non-market neutral strategies, sector neutral and non-sector neutral strategies, longer term and intermediate-term holding periods. It is fair to say that just about everyone is bewildered and trying to understand when this rally will end.

Another factor to consider is that there has been a significant improvement in the technical position of world stock markets. In the US the largest number of new 12-month lows was reached in October. At the November 21 low at 741 for the S&P 500, the number of new lows had already contracted, and even more so at the index’s March 6 low at 666. Also, market breadth and the number of stocks moving above their 200-day moving averages have taken a decisive turn for the better, indicating that the stock market advance is broadening and that the number of stocks that have bottomed out (at least in the intermediate turn) is expanding.

I have explained repeatedly in the past that if a government is really determined to try and postpone an inevitable collapse by “printing money” in order to lift or support asset prices, it can be done. However, the result of such a monetary policy is to lower the purchasing power of its paper currency, with catastrophic long-term consequences for its economic and financial volatility.

It forces individuals and institutions with cash to buy something…anything. So, this cash is channeled into gold and/or different paper currencies, commodities, equities, bonds, real estate, and consumer goods and services, but obviously with different intensities and at different times. For instance, at some times, such as in 2008, more money will be allocated to gold; while at other times, such as since early March, more money will flow into equities and industrial commodities. It is well understood that these money flows are driven largely by speculative activity (and more than a little dose of manipulation). The result in all asset markets is very high volatility and price fluctuations that don’t appear to make any sense to most market participants and observers who don’t understand the new rules of the investment game that were brought about by “money printing”.

This is where we are today, irrespective of whether or not you and I like policies of “quantitative easing, massive bailouts, and frightening fiscal deficits” and their long-term consequences! Another positive factor for stock markets is that a large number of Asian stock markets and individual stocks in the region had already bottomed out in October and November of 2008 and didn’t confirm the new low in the S&P in early March.

In Asia, the Taiwan and Shanghai indexes, and Korea’s Kospi Index, are all up by more than 50% from their late October 2008 lows. (The Shenzhen Index is up 90%.) But it is not only the Asian equity markets that have outperformed the US and Western European markets over the last few months; since late January 2009, the RTS Russian Index is up 66% and the MSCI Emerging Market ETF is up by 55% from its early November 2008 low.

This is not to say that the global economy is about to embark on a strong and sustainable growth phase. It also doesn’t mean that a new bull market in global equities à la 1982– 2000 has begun. But I think that, at least in nominal terms (inflation-adjusted), the global printing presses being run by the world’s central banks and fiscal deficits have begun to impact asset prices positively. Therefore, in the case of resource and mining stocks, as well as Asian equities (and, for that matter, most emerging and other stock markets around the globe), the lows thatwere reached between October and March of this year are likely to hold — that is, for now.

The markets that have the highest probability of having made major longer-term lows are resource-related equities, emerging markets, and Japan. Conversely, the asset market that has the highest probability of having made a secular high (such as Japan in 1989, or the Nasdaq in March 2000) is the US long-term government bond market.

Despite a still-weakening economy and massive quantitative easing, long-term bond yields appear to be on the verge of breaking out on the upside. I have listed again below all the equity recommendations I have made since December 2008. Some of these equities have already moved up substantially (resource and mining companies, in particular) and, therefore, I would only buy most of these recommendations on a correction.

In addition, a number of BRIC and other (mostly emerging market) closed-end country funds and ETS were recommended, such as Brazil ETF (EWZ), the Templeton Russia Fund (TRF), the Greater China Fund (GCH), the Asia Pacific Fund (APB), Taiwan iShares (EWT), the Japanese ETF (EWJ), the Japan Smaller Capitalization Fund (JOF), the Morgan Stanley India Fund (IIF), the Turkish Fund (TKF), and the MSCI Emerging Market ETF (EEM).

In the US, late last year we recommended buying the iShares iBox Investment Grade Corporate Bond (LQD) and Nicholas Applegate Convertible & Income Fund (NCV), while earlier this year we recommended the accumulation of stocks of high-tech companies such as Cisco (CSCO), Intel (INTL), Oracle (ORCL), and Yahoo (YHOO). More recently, we recommended beaten-down insurance companies and financials as rebound candidates, including Leucadia National (LUK) and CNA Financial (CNA), Citigroup (C), the BKX, the Financial Bull 3x Shares (FAS), and the Financials Select Sector SPDR.

The market’s advance had been broadening and that more and more groups such as airlines (AMR), homebuilders (TOL, CTX, HOV), and cyclicals such as Dow Chemical (DOW), International Paper (IP), and Alcoa (AA) are showing signs of having bottomed out. Among commodities, I am particularly intrigued by natural gas. There are natural gas ETFs (UNG, GAZ), but costs are high. A better way is probably just to buy future contracts, or Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD) or the First Trust ISE Revere Natural Gas Index Fund (FCG).

Source: What to Buy…or Not Buy