Merger Mondays are back. But the markets don’t like the news. Even though a handful of the nation’s most economically sensitive firms are pulling their heads from the sand and shelling out big bucks in the name of growth, the markets started the week deep in the red thanks to a disastrous end-of-the-month selloff in Asia.

As investors across the globe wonder if revenue growth is necessary to prop up current share prices, China’s market dipped by more than 6% on Monday. The bears trounced their way across the globe, taking European markets down by about 1% and the S&P down an equal proportion so far today.

But there is good news, especially if you are a fan of comic books. Word is quickly spreading that Disney (NYSE:DIS) has worked out a $4 billion deal to purchase Marvel Entertainment (NYSE:MVL).

Now Mickey and Donald will have to fight with the likes of Spider Man and Iron Man for the attention of Minnie and Cinderella.

This is an interesting deal for several reasons. First, the move shows Disney needs to find growth any way it can find it. With a nasty recession hurting its theme park sales and its media business, the easiest path towards top-line growth is by purchasing it.

The fact that nearly half of the $4 billion deal will come in the form of Disney shares helps to illustrate Disney top brass feels share price is heading towards overpriced territory.

While the deal will add to Disney’s revenue stream, the news will likely be detrimental to share price over the next few weeks and months. So far today, however, shares are down by just 1.25%, only slightly worse than the overall market.

Cartoons and chemicals

About as far removed from the fast-action world of comic book characters and theme parks is the competitive and rather boring chemical industry.

The nation’s top titanium-dioxide pigment manufacturers may not be a conversation during a Saturday-night date, but come Monday morning, with word of a major acquisition, it is worth checking out, especially for us finance geeks.

Earlier today, Huntsman (NYSE:HUN) announced its $145 million bid for Tronox (PINK:TRXAQ), a bankrupt company with loads of debt but over a billion in annual revenues.

The offer, while agreed on by both sides is anything but final. It still has to be approved by a bankruptcy court, and as a “stalking horse” contract can be outbid by another party, like the industry leader Dupont (NYSE:DD).

Although Huntsman will have to pay for the acquisition through added debt, the move will almost immediately benefit Huntsman’s balance sheet and cash flow.

Shares of Huntsman are down by just over 5% so far today (after tripling since March), but don’t expect the bearishness to persist. Once this deal comes closer to finalization, share price will change direction.

Investors that get in over the next week or so will likely get a bargain.

While both stories are creating trading opportunities, the best news is for the overall markets. Increased M&A activity is a sign of a recovering market and a strengthening economy. The more cash we see put on the line, the higher stock prices will go.

I am already looking forward to next Monday.

Source: Let the Buying Begin: Merger Mondays are Back!

Private equity is an asset class consisting of equity securities in operating companies that are not publicly traded.  The name “private equity”is the rechristened, kinder and more gentile label for what used to be known as leveraged buyouts, or LBOs. But make no mistake about it, while leverage may not be part of the name any more, it remains a big part of every private equity deal.

LBO firms, or “franchises”, as Henry Kravis, co-founder of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR), likes to call his shop, acquire publicly traded operating companies. Then they streamline management and operations to increase profitability and hope to cash out through a merger, an outright sale of the company, or by taking the company public again through an initial public offering, or IPO.

Private equity firms are the debutante sisters of hedge funds. They raise huge pools of capital from pension funds, endowment funds, sovereign wealth funds, institutional investors and wealthy entrepreneurs. But while hedge funds buy and sell the stocks of companies they hope to profit from, private equity shops buy whole companies.

Generally, once a target is identified, an offer is made to buy a majority, or all of the stock of the company. The trick of the deal is to pay for the target by using as little equity capital as possible, and raising the remainder by actually having the target company borrow the required funds. Except for the private equity firm’s initial equity investment, the target company is essentially buying itself.

And if that isn’t enough of a trick, very often when the target is privatized, their new masters have the company borrow even more money so they can then pay themselves a dividend as a bonus for the good job they did in leveraging the company to the hilt so they can streamline it.

The leveraged buyout business has been around for a long time and it has worked very well for investors and the private investment bankers who make an extravagant living with other people’s money. In fact, the business was so successful it eventually led to its now very problematic fork in the road. The problem facing private equity is that their leveraged deals were at one time in such great demand that it became too easy to borrow too much money.

The result was that they chased too many deals, paid too much for targets, paid themselves too many dividends and fees, and now their portfolio companies are straining and collapsing under the weight of too much debt.

Act I: The Two Big Mistakes that Made Leveraging Possible

There are two elements that made massive borrowing possible.

The first was a ready supply of capital courtesy of the U.S. Federal Reserve’s easy money policy and low interest rates. The second was the ability of banks that lend money to acquired companies to pool those loans into securities called  collateralized loan obligations, or CLOs, and sell them off to investors. Banks and investors refer to this asset class as “leveraged loans.”

Since banks were able to sell off their leverage loans to investors they had plenty of recycled money to lend out again and again. Competition to lend out all that money put borrowers in an advantageous position, which they exploited.

Banks and non-bank lenders attach covenants to the loans they make. Typically, covenants dictate to borrowers what specific balance sheet requirements must be met and include debt-to-cash flow leverage ratios, limitations on the total amount of debt a company can carry, minimum equity provisions and other dictates that serve to secure collateral that is relied upon by lenders.

But, banks were so flush with money and so eager to lend that privately acquired companies, driven by their new private equity masters, proposed that the money they borrowed should not be encumbered by the protective covenants lenders are used to demanding. Hence the birth of “covenant-lite” loans.

Covenant-lite loans included insane “reverse covenants” that benefited the borrowers not the lenders.

Among other things, some borrowers demanded and got rights to:

• Increase debt-to-EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, and Amortization) levels to 10:1.
• Freely substitute collateral.
• Have collateral “released” outright.
• Issue unsecured debt equal to the total amount of existing debt (if they hedged or effected swaps.
• Employ PIK (payment-in-kind) options, where instead of paying interest in cash they could substitute more debt.
• Employ PIK toggles, sometimes called “extendibles.”

PIK toggles (think of a toggle switch which is used to turn something on or off) let the borrower can roll interest payments into principal and extend the maturity, instead of making twice yearly cash payments. If that sounds like an option ARM mortgage, where borrowers can choose whether to pay the interest due, some part of it, or none of it, and roll unpaid interest into principal, it’s because it is the exact same borrower covenant.

It’s like déjà vu all over again.

Act II: With No Leverage Private Equity Deals Fall Apart

Junk, junk and more junk. When the music stopped and the credit crisis began last August, money and credit evaporated. Only then did it bother leveraged loan investors that the private equity guys were leveraging their private companies to pay themselves huge dividends – enough in many cases to repay the entire initial cash equity investment used to underpin the leveraged buyout of their targets. And only then did they realize that all the debt heaped onto these companies was going to drag many of them into bankruptcy.

At that point, investors simply stopped buying leveraged loans. And the net result is that banks may be sitting on over $150 billion of junk leveraged loans that they can’t place. They are taking hits to their balance sheets as they have to mark down these loans which were securitized and subject to mark-to-market accounting. And they are terrified that the recession will drive more of these leveraged companies into bankruptcy.

Thomson Reuters recently reported that 40 private equity companies have sought bankruptcy this year. According to Standard & Poor’s, of 86 S&P rated companies that defaulted this year, 53 of them were private equity related transactions. Linens ‘n Things which was taken private by Apollo Group Inc. went bankrupt. Sharper Image, Wickes Furniture and catalogue company Lillian Vernon, were all taken private by Sun Capital Partners Inc., all of them are bankrupt. Mervyn’s which was taken private by Sun Capital and Cerberus Capital Management LP. is bankrupt.

Also in the clutches of the three-headed-dog from Hades, Cerberus, is Chrysler LLC; Chrysler Financial, GMAC LLC (General Motors Acceptance Corporation) (GMA) – 51% owned by Cerberus – and Residential Capital LLC, a GMAC company. By most accounting standards, all of these companies are, if not already, close to insolvent.

GateHouse Media Inc. (OTC: GHS), 40% owned by Fortress Investment Group LLC (FIG), is at risk of debt default and may likely be headed for bankruptcy. Former Lazard Ltd. (LAZ) deputy chairman and  media honcho Steve Rattner’s Quadrangle Capital Partners may lose control of American Media Inc., publisher of The National Enquirer and Star magazine, as he battles with bondholders and may also lose portfolio company Alpha Media Group Inc., publisher of Maxim magazine. These few examples of failures are just the tip of the iceberg.

Then, of course, there’s the pure genius of PE firms coming to the rescue of troubled banks. But, TPG Capital (formerly Texas Pacific Group) doesn’t look so genius with its $7 billion investment in Washington Mutual Inc. (OTC: WAMUQ) which was wiped out in a matter of five months.

It’s understandable that bankrupt target companies are suing. Mervyn’s, for example, filed a 57 page suit against its lead dog master Cerberus, alleging fraud among other charges. But what is not as easily understandable is that some other lawsuits have the potential to turn the game viciously against the private equity firms and all the major bank lenders. I’m not talking about the deals that got done; I’m talking about the deals that didn’t get done because private equity firms walked away or otherwise tried to dissolve pending deals.

Apollo Management asked a Delaware Court of Chancery to kill a transaction it had entered into to have one of its portfolio companies, Hexion Specialty Chemicals Inc., buy NYSE listed Huntsman Corp.(HUN) for $6.5 billion. Huntsman sued and won. The judge issued a ruling that Hexion “knowingly and intentionally” breached parts of the merger agreement and ordered the company to complete the deal. Not only is Apollo being forced to go through with the deal, the ruling allows Huntsman to seek damages from Apollo. Apollo is now suing the banks it had lined up to provide debt financing for the deal.

There are hundreds of billions of dollars of abandoned deals that may now be re-visited in courts around the country. The implication for private equity firms and banks is potentially staggering.

Here are a few of the larger failed deals that resulted from a lack of debt investor interest:

• Cerberus’ failed  deal for United Rentals Inc. (URI).
• The Blackstone Group LP’s (BX) failed deal for Alliance Data Systems Corp. (ADS).
• J.C. Flowers’ failed deal for SLM Corp. (SLM), also known as Sallie Mae.
• And Appaloosa Management in conjunction with Harbinger Capital Partners, Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. (MER), Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS), and UBS Securities LLC’s failed financing of Delphi Corp. (OTC: DPHIQ) to take it out of bankruptcy, for which they are being sued for fraud and conspiracy to “derail” the bankruptcy plan; a serious situation because interfering with a bankruptcy is a federal crime.

The amount of leverage involved in private equity deals is a problem if banks aren’t eager, or able, to supply needed loans. But that alone isn’t scary. What is scary is the effort private equity firms are making to actually get into the banking business themselves.

Act III: Private Equity Seeks to Corrupt Banking System

There’s a lot of pressure on banks to raise capital and there’s a lot of pressure being exerted by the private equity guys to lean on the Fed and U.S. Treasury to bend the rules to let them play in that sandbox. Pushing hard from the private equity camp are Randall Quarles, Managing Director of Carlyle Group Ltd. and a former senior Treasury official and none other than the former Treasury Secretary himself, Chairman of Cerberus Capital Management, John Snow.

What the private equity guys want is the ability to buy into banks and control them. If they get their hands on the low cost deposit-based capital at commercial banks, they’ll be unstoppable. How about having the piggy-bank, backed by taxpayers to leverage at will?

The prospect is frightening.

Right now there’s a limitation imposed on investors in Federal Deposit Insurance Company insured commercial banks. Once an investment exceeds 9.9% there must be an agreement with regulators to not “control or influence” management. If an investment exceeds 24.9% the investing entity must register as a Bank Holding Company, and subject itself to all necessary transparencies called for by regulators and the Fed. In addition, the holding company is forced to serve as a “source of strength”, meaning its capital will be called upon to support its bank.

Private equity guys do not want any part of either of those restrictions. They don’t want their business looked through nor do they want their capital encumbered. The private equity firms are sitting on hundreds of billions of dollars of fresh money raised recently. While it may seem reasonable and expedient to allow private equity capital to be infused into ailing banks, any compromise of existing regulations would result in the creation of the mother of all moral hazard enablers.

There’s no doubt that if the recession is as deep and as long as feared,, the continuing failure and bankruptcy of leveraged private equity portfolio companies will result in far greater unemployment, and in and of itself, has the potential to deepen the recession on an inordinate scale.

There’s too much greed and far too much power in the form of private equity firms. Their greed has encumbered American banks with significant CLO and leveraged loan exposure and encumbered American companies with too much debt. Now, they threaten to undermine sound banking (wait a minute, that’s already been done by the banks themselves) by investing capital into them in order to control them.

Until concrete underpinnings replace the glue and duct tape that’s holding together the banking system, and until leverage is wrung out of companies, investment vehicles and households, banks and private equity firms will both be on a slippery slope.

Source: Overly Leveraged Private Equity Deals Add to Unemployment and Deepen Recession

• Citigroup Inc. (C) may lay off more workers this week under a March plan to cut its trading and investment-banking workforce by about 6,000, or 10%. So far, about half of the jobs have been shed, a source with knowledge of the matter told Bloomberg.

• The Joint Center for Housing Studies released its annual State of the Nation’s Housing report yesterday (Monday), MarketWatch reported. According to the report, the slump still has further to run, as local markets continue to grapple with drops in housing starts, new home sales and existing home sales.

• Republic Services Inc. (RSG) said yesterday (Monday) that it would buy Allied Waste Industries (AW) in a $6.07 billion stock deal that would combine the second- and third-largest disposal companies in the industry. Republic Services Inc. will pay Allied Waste shareholders .45 worth of a Republic share for each share held, valued at $14.04 per share based on Republic’s Friday closing stock price of $31.19, the Associated Press reported.

• The euro fell 0.6% to $1.5516 at 4:31 p.m. in New York yesterday (Monday), from $1.5606 on June 20 after the Ifo survey showed German business confidence fell to its lowest level since 2005 in June, Bloomberg News reported. A separate study showed that Eurozone manufacturing and services both contracted in June, which also put downward pressure on the euro.

• Chemicals manufacturer Huntsman Corp. (HUN) sued Leon Black, head of Apollo Management LP, for more than $3 billion after a failed takeover. In a complaint filed yesterday (Monday), Huntman alleged that Black and Apollo co-founder Joshua Harris engaged in fraud and tortious interference to gain acceptance of a bid for Apollo’s Hexion Specialty Chemicals Inc. unit.

• General Motors Corp. (GM) announced it would increase prices on its 2009 line in response to soaring commodity costs, The Wall Street Journal reported. The struggling automaker will also extend its summer shutdown at six plants and offer more sales incentives in hopes of decreasing inventory on its larger vehicles such as pick-up trucks and sport-utility vehicles.

• French firm Safran SA (PINK: SAFRY) made a $300 billion cash offer for the secure ID business of Digimarc Corp. (DMRC) topping a previous offer from L-1 Identity Solutions Inc. (ID) put forth in March, Reuters reported. In a statement. Digimarc said its board has determined that Safran’s proposal “could reasonably be expected to lead to a superior proposal,” which would allow the company a chance to back on out on its deal with L-1.

• Shares of Motorola Inc. (MOT) dropped over 6% yesterday (Monday) after analysts downgraded the outlook for the mobile phone maker. The stock dropped 50 cents to close at $7.44 after analysts at Piper Jaffray Cos. (PJC) and Avian Securities lowered ratings on Motorola stock, Reuters reported.

Source: Global Investment Roundups Tuesday, June 24th, 2008