The suits on the Street ask themselves these questions every day. They don’t realize that these superpowers aren’t the only places you can make big money.

Indonesia has the world’s fourth largest population, over 200 million people, but it ranks no. 16 in GDP purchasing power. Poverty and disease plague this sleeping giant. That’s why the median age of the country is just 28 years old.

The country has made some progress of late through the presidency of Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. Elected in 2004, Yudhoyono was an already important and popular figure in Indonesia after a few stints in the first couple cabinets of the fairly new democracy. He has the rank of General and is a very influential military leader worldwide.

He continues to stay popular and will, in all probability, get reelected later this year. Yudhoyono is not only a military-focused politician, he’s also an economic visionary in a country that desperately needs that kind of vision.

In just his first term, he’s already signed an important trade agreement with Japan, opening his country’s enormous population to the world’s second largest economy.

Barack Obama recently invited Yudhoyono to the White House to discuss the U.S.’s role in helping developing countries during this economic recession. The two met again a few weeks later at the G-20, which Indonesia recently joined.

All of this prestige helped Yudhoyono make Time’s 100 Most Influential Persons list this year. But it’s also helped segments of Indonesia’s population obtain some new G-20 benefits.

Even with all of the international help, Indonesia may not ever become a superpower. But the country does provide unique opportunities…if you know where to look.

The Growth Story of the Century

One of the most exciting growth industries in the Far East is Internet service providers. According to InternetWorldStats.com, 73.8% of Japanese and 76.1% of South Koreans are online. Even about one in every four Chinese citizens now has Internet access…

Indonesia is trailing in the region with just 10.5% of its population online. Here’s our growth opportunity! In 2000, only two million Indonesians had the Internet. That number is set to reach 25 million this year.

But this growing ISP industry is only part of the story…

While Indonesia continues to struggle with some basic luxuries that the Western world takes for granted — such as cable television and wireless Internet access — its citizens do have cell phones. In fact, around 58% of the population already has a cell phone subscription — that’s over 130 million subscriptions.

Even with so many current subscribers, growth hasn’t slowed at all. The mobile phone industry is still growing at a 36% clip annually.

The reason I bring these two industries up together is because of a unique opportunity. I found a company with a 46% market share of both the broadband Internet and the cellular industries. That’s the top spot. This is like finding Ma Bell at the turn of the 20th century — minus the anti-trust issues.

You see, this company’s largest investor is the Indonesian government. It’s a rock solid company that I’ll be recommending early next week to my Lifetime Income Report readers.

Sincerely,
Jim Nelson

Source: A Second Chance to Buy AT&T at the Turn of the Century

Of course the floods in the Midwest will only aggravate rising food prices. But Kevin Kerr of Resource Trader Alert says the worst pain for consumers probably won’t make itself felt till next year. That is, for the moment the cattle and hog farmers have enough corn-based feed in reserve… but once that runs out, they’ll slaughter a significant portion of their livestock and do nothing to replace it, because it will simply cost too much to do so.

Energy? Not much better. Byron King from Outstanding Investments is watching the rapid depletion of Mexico’s Cantarell oil field. I asked him what the latest estimates are for when Mexico goes the way of Indonesia and becomes a net oil importer. 2011, he said. Not a good situation for the U.S. #2 supplier (after Canada).

We discussed any number of other matters too, the results of which will show up in the editors’ recommendations to their paid membership in the weeks ahead. You can access all of it with the Agora Financial Reserve. Membership opens up only a couple of times a year, and one of those times is now.

In-between meetings I’m still keeping my eye on the nonsense that passes for economic news in the mainstream press. A front-page story in yesterday’s Washington Post marked a severe setback to the burgeoning trend last month in which the accuracy of government economic figures were starting to come under scrutiny. In the world of the Posties, the economy is just ducky and perception just isn’t matching up with reality. The notion that the books are being cooked wasn’t even acknowledged. Sigh.

Source: Report from the Editorial Meeting

That decision may not seem very significant, but consider it this way: If you were Indonesia, which countries would you rather have as your buddies? A bunch of sleazy, corrupt, idle “lottery winners” such as Nigeria, Venezuela and Angola? Or would you prefer a set of hard-working and diligent neighbors such as Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand? Not to mention two of the largest growth economies in the world: India and China?

Believe me, when Indonesia left OPEC it wasn’t to save the paltry $3 million annual dues. Like Groucho Marx, Indonesia decided it didn’t want to be a member of a club that had such low standards for membership. Instead, it would rather join the good guys.

For emerging market investors, that choice is a significant one.

To be fair, Indonesia’s decision wasn’t just based on a snobbish desire to mingle with a classier set of countries. For one thing, while Indonesia still produces and even exports quite a lot of oil, it’s a big country and is no longer self-sufficient from a petroleum standpoint: While its needs are about 1.1 million barrels per day, its production is now only 860,000.

What’s more, Indonesia doesn’t share OPEC’s ambition, which currently appears to be to squeeze the rest of the world until oil costs $1 million a drop. Indonesia subsidizes oil for its domestic consumers (237 million of them, most of who are pretty poor) and so the last thing it wanted was yet higher oil prices – the subsidies were killing its budget.

President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono took a huge amount of heat when he increased domestic oil prices by 125% in 2005; there were more riots after he found it necessary to raise them another 30%. However, if he hadn’t done so, oil subsidies alone would have been more than 20% of government spending – and that’s before taking into account food subsidies for the poor, also necessary in a year when rice prices have trebled.

The bottom line is that Indonesia wants lower – not higher – oil prices. More so, in the last decade, it has abandoned the sillier features of an OPEC-member country’s economic-management playbook. While the oil company Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara – commonly referred to as Pertamina – is still state-owned, it is allowed to do joint ventures with foreign companies. And, unlike Russia or most OPEC countries, Indonesia’s government has the sense not to steal the proceeds of those joint ventures that prove themselves successful. As a result, more than half of Indonesia’s oil-import deficit will disappear when the Cepu Block offshore oil fields, jointly developed by Pertamina and Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM), opens up to full production in 2010.

Since Indonesia doesn’t agree with OPEC’s prime objective, and doesn’t approve of OPEC’s typical state-owned kleptocracy as a way of conducting business, it’s not surprising it decided to leave.

That’s not to say that Indonesia has reached free-market perfection. For one thing, it remains astonishingly corrupt – ranked 143rd on Transparency International’s 2007 Corruption Perceptions Index. That places the country far below China and India and close to the level that makes Nigeria and Myanmar such charming places in which to do business. The corruption dates back to the 32-year rule (1966 to 1998) of Indonesian strongman Suharto, who modernized the economy but used his position to grab billions of dollars for himself and his family and was forced out of office in an economic collapse. He died early this year.

Nevertheless, in the last decade, instead of wasting energies on rooting out every vestige of Suhartoism, Indonesia has moved a long way towards being a functioning democracy. Under Yudhoyono, the economy has grown at around 5% per capita, while privatizations have taken place – the steel company Krakatau is due to be privatized later this year, for example. Public spending has been kept under control and, most importantly, Indonesia has used these years of easy money and high commodity prices to pay down debt. Its international debt is now only 35% of its gross domestic product (GDP), a level it should easily be able to live with without major crises.

In summary, Indonesia has moved from a commodity exporter to a true emerging market, and deserves the attention of investors accordingly.

There are only two Indonesian companies with full American Depositary Receipt (ADR) listings, both of them in the telecom sector. Thus, the easiest way for a U.S. individual investor to invest in Indonesia is through the closed-end Indonesia Fund (IF) The fund is run by Credit Suisse Group AG (ADR: CS), is rather small at only $93 million in assets, but has the advantage of selling at a 9% discount to net asset value (NAV), with an expense ratio of 1.55%. It has returned 38% per annum over the last five years, as Indonesia has demonstrated its recovery from the 1998 “Asian contagion” financial crisis, but there would appear to be more to go for.

Indonesia’s satellite telephone company PT Indosat Tbk (ADR: IIT) operates cell-phone and long-distance services, and is currently trading at a Price/Earnings ratio of 15 on trailing earnings. It has a dividend yield of 4%.

Indonesia’s fixed-line telephone company, PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia (ADR: TLK), is trading at a trailing P/E of 14, and features a dividend yield of 3.6%. It offers fixed-line and cell-phone services, and is the country’s traditional telephone provider, founded in 1884.

With the two ratings so close, I would tend to go for the satellite service PT Indosat Tbk, since Indonesia is a large and enormously complex archipelago, with shaky infrastructure.

Source: Even Groucho Marx Would be Happy With Indonesia’s Profit Opportunities

For almost five decades, Indonesia held a unique position as the only Asian member of the OPEC oil-exporters’ cartel. When it joined OPEC in 1962, it was Southeast Asia’s undisputed energy giant. But yesterday marked the end of an era for the country. Indonesia has formally withdrawn from the oil cartel.

You see, the country’s oil production hit a peak in 1976. And In the early 90’s it was still producing about 1.7 million barrels per day. But ageing oil fields and a lack of investment has seen falling production since 1995. The country now produces about 800,000 barrels per day and it’s been a net oil importer since 2005. Its days in OPEC were obviously numbered.

It’s big news in the oil industry, but I think that the country’s withdrawal from OPEC is really a bit of a non-event — at least from an investor’s point of view. Indonesia is still a major energy exporter. The country is the world’s biggest exporter of thermal coal, which is widely used in the power sector. It is the world’s second biggest exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG) after the Gulf state of Qatar. And it has recently overtaken Malaysia as the world’s biggest producer of palm oil as well.

Global oil demand is expected to increase by 1.03 million barrels per day this year. And about 70 per cent of that additional demand is going to come from Asia. But it’s not just oil. Asia’s growing economies are fuelling demand for just about all forms of energy. And Indonesia is well placed to profit from it.

Coal is gold…

The country is sitting on about 90.5 billion tons of coal. And demand for the stuff is surging. In fact, Indonesian companies are now selling coal to Japanese buyers at double last year’s prices. So, investors have been flooding into the sector. Indonesia’s biggest coal miner, Bumi Resources, has seen its share price soar by about 431 per cent in the last year. Its market cap is now $16.4bn

Now the country’s second and third biggest coal miners are planning on floating on the markets as well. Number two producer, Adaro Energy, is planning a Rp12,000 billion ($1.3bn), public offering. That will make it the biggest IPO in Indonesia’s history. And it’s going to be the world’s 8th biggest IPO this year.

Adaro has already pulled in top international investors. 64% of the company is controlled by two Indonesian strategic investors. But 36 per cent of the shares are owned by major global investors, including Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation.

And demand for the IPO has been huge. In March, the company announced that it planned to raise $500 million. Then, earlier this month, they raised that to about $1 billion…and then $1.3 billion…

The Adarco IPO is scheduled for next month. The country’s second biggest coal miner Indika Inti Energy plans on raising $300 million through selling an 18 per cent stake in an IPO shortly before the Adarco float. Both these IPOs are probably going to do well. Investors and speculators who missed out on Bumi Resources’ rally will probably try to get in early this time… a move I see as being quite sensible.

Bumi Resources is one to watch…

The two new coal IPO’s might take some of the wind out of Bumi’s sails. And if we see that happen, a fantastic buying opportunity will present itself.

Just consider: China is building new coal-fired power plants at a rate of about one per week! And then there is India. Asia’s other giant plans on adding more than 400,000 Megawatts of new capacity by 2030 — and the bulk of that is going to be powered by coal. So, the coal story still has a long way to go. In the months to come there could be moves to be made… and a second chance for anyone who missed out the first time around.

I’ll keep you posted.

Regards

Manraaj Singh
Profit Hunter
Editor

PS If you liked what you read here — you can become one of my regular subscribers and receive all our new Profit Hunter recommendations the moment we make them.

Source: Careful Timing Could Mean Big Profits From The Worlds No.1 Coal Exporter

Indonesia, the only OPEC member in Southeast Asia, will pull out of the group as aging fields and declining production force the region’s biggest economy to boost imports.

Energy Minister Purnomo Yusgiantoro will sign a decree today to exit the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, he told reporters in Jakarta. The nation, a member since 1962, has been considering leaving the body in the past three years.

As OPEC shrinks in numbers, there’s a new oil rush going on in Alberta, Canada.

“Alberta’s oil sands are the largest known reserve of oil on earth containing between 1.7 and 2.5 trillion barrels,” says Alex Green in InvestmentU. (Saudi Arabia, by comparison, has only 262 billion barrels of proven reserves. In fact, all OPEC nations combined have less than 900 billion barrels.)

“For decades, these sands weren’t even considered part of the world’s oil reserves because the oil there wasn’t economically extractable at prevailing prices using then-current technology. But times have changed… And the new gold rush is on.

“Here’s the kicker: Exploration of Alberta’s oil sands is virtually risk-free. You can’t drill a dry hole here. There’s no drilling at all. It’s a mining operation – and the reserves are thoroughly outlined. So what you really need is a company with plenty of machinery, money and manpower to dig it up and process it as quickly as possible.”

Read on here to find out the one undisputed blue-chip play on Alberta’s oil sands.

The good news is that there is new oil production capacity in the pipeline this year and next,” says Dan Denning in The Daily Reckoning Australia.

“Keep in mind that the final investment decision on the projects entering into production this year was made anywhere from 3-6 years ago. That shows you how far in advance you have to plan for new production (assuming you’ve even found oil in the first place).

“There are some massive LNG and natural gas projects coming on-stream between 2011 and 2015. Gazprom, Shell, BP, and ExxonMobil all look like big winners, should oil prices stay high and pass through to higher LNG prices.”

Energy Minister Purnomo Yusgiantoro announced today (Wednesday) that he would sign a decree officially withdrawing Indonesia from OPEC when its membership expires at the end of 2008.

A member since 1962, Indonesia’s exports have been waning for years due to aging oil wells and a lack of infrastructure investment by the government. Oil production is down 49% from its 1977 peak. The country has now become a net importer of oil, Purnomo said.

“If production comes back to give us the status of net oil exporter then we can go back to OPEC,” Purnomo said, speaking before the Jakarta Foreign Correspondents Club today, Bloomberg News reported.

Indonesia’s withdrawal from OPEC will help the Asian nation save an estimated $3.1 million (2 million euros) in membership fees per year, Purnomo noted.

The country has more than 4 billion barrel in proven reserves, according to the AFP. However, Indonesia’s production has been dropping steadily since 1995. So while other OPEC member nations have been benefiting from high oil prices, Indonesia has suffered as it has been forced to import oil.

“If OPEC had more solidarity with its members and helped those like us who are suffering from the current high prices, it would have been a different matter,” Indonesia’s Parliament energy committee chairman Agusman Effendi told the AFP.

Indonesia’s daily oil output has fallen to 927,000 barrels per day (bpd) this year, down from 950,000 barrels a day in 2007. Its daily output falls short of the nation’s daily consumption of approximately 1.2 to 1.3 million barrels per day, according to Reuters UK.

The Indonesian government heavily subsidizes retail oil sales to the tune of almost $13 million per year. But due to rising costs, the government has had to enact unpopular fuel price increases, which have sparked civilian protests.

Oil’s Bubbling Higher

Oil reached a record high of $135 per barrel on May 22, but since then the price has dropped.

Oil prices have been volatile today. At 1:48 p.m., oil for July delivery was trading at $131.28 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Earlier, however, crude oil traded down as low as $125.96 today, according to Bloomberg data.

But the slight reprieve we’re currently experiencing is likely to reverse itself just as quickly as we head into the summer driving season and speculators continue to drive up the price of “black gold.”

Both Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) and JP Morgan Chase & Co. (JPM) recently released reports that have oil soaring over $200 a barrel within the next two years.

Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald – one of the first investment gurus to predict triple-digit oil prices – has boosted his own target, suggesting that oil could go as high as $225 a barrel.

“The math is really simple here,” Fitz-Gerald said in a recent e-mail interview from China. “We are burning through supplies at a rate that’s four times to five times faster than we’re discovering new reserves. Throw in a few [surprises]… perhaps a terrorist event… and add in the accelerating use of oil and gasoline in Third World countries, and we have the recipe for far higher prices.”

Source: Indonesia to Withdraw from OPEC Due to High Oil Prices

Right now the gold-to-oil ratio is trading around 7. That means a single ounce of gold is roughly worth seven barrels of light sweet crude. With oil trading near $130 a barrel, this is an extreme low point for the ratio.

The previous drop in mid-2005, when an ounce of gold was briefly worth 6.5 barrels of oil, was the lowest the ratio has been in decades.

Oil Too Expensive, or Gold Too Cheap?

So what does it mean when the gold-to-oil ratio moves toward an extreme like this? In historical terms, it suggests that something is out of whack. Either oil has gotten too expensive, or gold has gotten too cheap.

The last time we saw an extreme in the other direction was late 1998, when the gold-to-oil ratio rose above 26. That was a case of oil being way too cheap… and of course, crude oil bottomed out for all time just a few months after that.

Given the way oil is trading now — the recent rocket ride to $130 a barrel, etc. — some think that oil has gotten too expensive, too fast. Their view would be that the price of oil has to come down, perhaps by a lot, and that the gold-to-oil ratio is reflecting this.

Your humble editor disagrees with this view for a number of reasons.

For starters, there’s a lot of hot air about how oil could be a bubble and speculators are driving oil prices… but there is little proof of this charge, and a lot more evidence pointing in the other direction.

Germany’s Folly

Angry German politicians have gone so far as to call for a worldwide ban on oil trading. They think that $130 oil is all the evil speculators’ fault, and that all the traders should have their hands tied.

This is about the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard, and a good example of how politicians can be dangerous. One of the key functions of markets is price discovery; through self-interested buying and selling, the markets act as a useful forecasting tool. (One of the best forecasting tools we have at any rate.)

Without a functioning market mechanism to determine the price of a valued good, the market breaks down. You either have lots of one-off transactions taking place in the dark, or else you have some government committee setting the price by fiat. I hear Soviet Russia tried that. It didn’t work out too well.

The activity of traders and speculators also provides much-needed liquidity to markets. When, say, an airline like Southwest buys heating oil futures contracts to lower its exposure to jet fuel costs, more often than not there are traders on the other side of the transaction. Without someone to take the other side of a trade, end-users of oil and gas products have no way to hedge their business risk.

In a very real sense, speculators are paid to take on risks that hedgers don’t want. Risk transference is a vital market mechanism. The German politicians don’t get this. Or maybe they do get it, but they just don’t care.

Trying to restrict trading would be a fool’s errand anyway. There is more than enough competition among global exchanges to keep the trading going, even if some goofball government tries to ban trading on a local basis. That’s a very good thing.

Et Tu, George?

Hedge fund legend George Soros is blaming the speculators, too, calling the oil price a bubble. Without putting too fine a point on it, this is a major piece of hypocrisy.

Why? Because the existence of men like Soros show exactly why big markets are hard to manipulate.

If the price of oil were truly in a bubble, some big hedge fund player with guts and foresight could come along and make a killing by shorting the daylights out of it… thus driving the price of oil back down to non-bubble levels in the process.

This is exactly what Soros himself did in 1992. That was the year he earned the nickname “The Man Who Broke the Bank of England,” for the huge score he made shorting the British pound.

And a few days ago, Avocet promised to announce profits of $47-$52m for the year to end March.   While precise figures will have to wait for the full announcement in July, this will do nicely to be going on with. Last year profits were only $23m.

Reassuringly dull

Low costs…rising production… politically relatively stable locations… prudent management – the Avocet story is reassuringly dull.

It wasn’t always so. Until recently, they operated in such locations as Tajikistan. Avocet got out of that country – much to the relief of the shareholders.   Now Avocet is mining and exploring in Malaysia – it owns 100% of Malaysia’s Penjom mine, the country’s largest gold producer. It also owns 80% of the North Lanut gold mine in North Sulawesi, Indonesia.

The trading statement also announced the latest gold production figures. These came in 10% better than the same time last year, at 157,907 ounces. The average price received was 26% higher.

While those numbers went up, costs went down. Cash costs are 10% lower than a year ago, at around $316 an ounce. In fact Avocet is one of the cheapest gold producers.

As CEO Jonathan Henry commented: “In the current inflationary environment it is especially pleasing to be able to report continuing cost reductions which firmly place Avocet in the lowest quartile of global gold producers.

“Meanwhile the strong gold price has improved margins and our operations continue to generate significant cash that we are investing in our portfolio of production, development and exploration assets.”

Those profits do not even include money from disposals. There is another $21m from the sale of a prospect in Malaysia.

Continues below

Recommended

Grab an easy £550 – £1,100 every single week.

Become a part-time Forex profit raider – in no time: in fact within 30 days you’ll be trading an average weekly income of £550 – £1,100, depending on what you stake. That’s between £28,600 and £57,200 per year tax free!

Terry Hodgkinson piled up £1,455 in his first week using stakes no higher than £5…

How much will you make?

Management is playing it safe on the gold price. It has prudently set up a cap arrangement on 190,000 ounces of production from January 2010 to July 2011 at $755 an ounce. And it has placed put options on 400,000 ounces at $600 an ounce between April this year and July 2011. So it has protected its profits even if the gold price does not hold at current levels.

Rising capacity and loads of cash

Not that this kind of arrangement pleases everybody! Some of the investment message boards have carried grumbles at its complexity.

For the board, it is a reflection of having lived through $350 gold. The effect of that was nasty even for low cost producers. The directors prefer to take out insurance – just in case!

Production is rising nicely. Avocet’s Bakan project in Indonesia will be commissioned in 2009. Based on the current mine plans, Avocet should produce around 170,000-200,000 ounces a year for the next five years. There are ten new exploration projects in Indonesia, and a number have been showing “excellent” drilling results.

Capacity will likely expand beyond what Avocet currently indicates, as exploration projects mature.

There is a load of cash – $122m at the year end – and no debt. But that cash is a bit of a two-edged sword!

Institutional shareholders don’t buy gold miners for their cash. They want that money put into producing gold.

Pressure is now on for an acquisition

While Avocet has produced deals in the form of exploration projects and has steadily increased the resources and reserves in its portfolio, that’s not enough!

It’s in a hurry to increase production. Avocet wants to reach an annual production level of 1 million ounces. And it wants to do this while it can still enjoy the current high gold price. Hence the pressure for acquisitions.

Avocet already has an interest in approximately 27% of Dynasty Gold Corporation, and a 19% interest in Monument Mining. Both companies are listed on the TSX Venture Exchange in Canada.

Jonathan Henry has given the reassurance that the board is discussing potential acquisition opportunities. As a 1% shareholder himself he also has a vested interest in growing Avocet as fast as possible. But the pressure is on.

Keep looking!

Erin and Isabel

PS Make sure you don’t miss out on getting all the latest industry news in one daily hit with a brand new free eletter from Fleet Street Publications.

But this decline is likely just the start for rice prices, which have been artificially inflated by government controls and may continue to plummet by as much as 20%.

Rice – which supplies one-fifth of the world’s calorie intake – really began its journey skyward last October, when India banned exports of non-basmati rice to protect the wildly popular grain from succumbing to inflationary pressures. Later that month, India eased the ban, but reapplied it last March.

Faced with civil unrest brought on by rising food prices, other countries have been following suit. In just a few months…

• India banned exports of non-basmati rice after inflation hit a 14-year high.
• Egypt, which typically brings 1.4 million metric tons of rice to the world market each year, banned exports from April 1 to Sept. 30.
• Vietnam, after curtailing exports in March and April, extended a ban on rice sales through May.
• Brazil suspended rice exports, approximately 313,000 metric tons a year, in an effort to maintain price stability.
• Indonesia suspended exports of medium-grade rice exports to combat inflation.

The price of rice doubled, and in some cases tripled, in the first four months of 2008, according to BusinessWeek. U.S. long grain rice jumped from $400 a ton to $800 a ton. Indian Basmati rice soared 182% from $850 a ton to $2,400 a ton. And Thai jasmine shot up from $559 per ton to $1,125.

But the price surge had little to do with supply and demand. Instead, experts pointed to the protectionist measures by rice producers.

“The primary reasons for the recent price spike in rice are due to export bans and restrictions by several major exporters globally that have tightened supplies in the global market,” Nathan Childs a rice specialist at the U.S. Department of Agriculture told Voice of America. “Overall though, the 2007-2008 rice crop is the largest on record and supplies are up a little bit from a year earlier.”

Only 7% of global rice production is traded internationally, which means any government intervention in the export or import markets could have a dramatic impact on rice supply and prices. Traders, millers, wholesalers and retailers also began hoarding supplies to see how much higher prices would go. A weak U.S. dollar and higher costs for fertilizer and shipping also contributed to the rise.

Speculation among investors and consumers has run rampant in recent months, adding to political and economic pressures. As the run-up in commodities price steepened in the early part of the year, driving the price of corn and wheat to all-time highs, traders on the Chicago Board of Trade dove head first into the volatile rice market. Rice futures have gained slightly less than 80% in the past year as a result.

“We have enough food on this planet today to feed everyone,” Adam Steiner, head of the U.N. Environment Program told the Associated Press, adding that the way that access to that food is being distorted by perceptions of future markets is distorting access to that food.

“Real people and real lives are being affected by a dimension that is essentially speculative,” Steiner said.

However, the market has begun to turnaround this week, with rice prices falling 11.6% from its April 24 peak. 

The drop accompanied news that Vietnam would produce enough rice to meet demand from exporters, as well as local consumers. The country also banned speculators from its domestic market.

Also, Thailand has announced it will release 2.1 million tons of rice from the state’s stockpiles for sale to the public to ensure that consumers pay moderate prices for the grain for the rest of the year.

Thailand is the world’s leading rice supplier and has repeatedly assured the public that it would not curb exports despite speculation to the contrary. The nation produces 18 to 20 million metric tons of milled rice each year, of which 9 million is consumed at home. The rest is exported.

Thailand has committed to the export of 8.75 to 9 million metric tons this year and remains confident it can meet that commitment, Reuters reported. In addition to causing a worldwide panic, going back on its word and imposing export curbs would be political suicide for the nations current governing party, which came into power largely on its populous farmer support. Almost half of Thailand’s 65 million people are involved in agriculture, which accounts for 11% of the nation’s GDP.

“I believe the government will not betray farmers who voted for them by imposing any export restrictions, which would cut export demand and adversely affect domestic prices,” Paka-on Tipayatanadaja, a rice analyst at Kasikorn Research in Bangkok, told Reuters. “Farmers invested a lot to grow more rice after the government said it has to plans to curb export. The government has no chance to reverse the policy now.”

Thai jasmine rice is one of the most popular types of rice in the world. U.S. imports of jasmine rice have jumped by 78% over the past ten years. One shopper outside a San Francisco Costco Wholesale Corp. (COST) stores told BusinessWeek that Thai jasmine rice was “the priced one, because of its smell.”

The price of the fragrant rice has benefited greatly from the bullish rice market as its price has more than doubled. As they did so, American shoppers and restaurant owners began panic buying the popular scented rice prompting wholesale clubs like Costco and the Wal-Mart Stores Inc.-owned (WMT) Sam’s Club to limit customers’ purchases.

Fortunately for jasmine rice fans, it’s likely that the price of all Thai rice will continue to ease next few weeks, possibly by 20% according to the secretary general of the Thai Rice Exporters’ Association.

“The market is likely to correct up to 20% even if the bans by India and Vietnam remain,” Korbsook Iamsuri, who is also managing director of Kamolkij Co. Ltd., told Reuters.

The benchmark Thai 100% B-grade white rice was quoted between $1,030 and $1,050 per metric ton, slightly below last week’s record of $1,080 per metric ton, Korbsook said. If she’s right, the price could adjust to $864 by mid-May. And if the price of Thai rice drops, it’s likely others will follow suit, as Thailand – which accounts for nearly a third of the global rice trade – is typically the standard bearer for global rice prices.

If rice prices persist at record levels, most experts expect that consumers will overcome cultural loyalties and switch to medium grade rice, like that grown in California and Arkansas. California will harvest approximately 4 billion pounds of rice this year, 40% of which will be exported. While it’s not as popular as its Asian counterparts, California rice has experienced a price jump of its own. According to the San Francisco Chronicle, California growers will get $20 per 100 pounds of rice this year, double the 2007 price. As a result the amount of rice being planted in the region is on the rise. Rice has been planted on an estimated 549,000 acres in California this year, up from 534,000 acres in 2007.