But we’re not…yet.

Classic economic theory says that money supply can be used to stimulate the economy and our central bankers seem to agree. That’s why they’ve pumped more than $1 trillion dollars into the economy, engineered countless bailout bonanzas for zombie institutions, put Detroit on life support, and delivered a bunch of financial Band-Aids to the trauma ward — all in a desperate bid to make Americans feel better about the global financial crisis.

To their way of thinking, the trillions of dollars have been a success. That’s why any meeting of the Group of Eight (G8) nations looks more like a mutual affection society with central bankers anxious to claim credit and backslap each other in congratulations for having avoided the “Great Depression II.”

But by taking the Federal balance sheet to more than $2 trillion from $928 billion 2008, they’ve created a situation that should have resulted in an epic inflationary spike to accompany the 137% increase in liabilities.

Yet that hasn’t quite happened.

Core inflation — which denotes consumer prices without food and energy costs — has actually decreased from 2.5% in 2008 to 1.5% presently. And that has many investors who have heard the siren call of the doom, gloom and boom crowd wondering if they’re worried about nothing.

So what gives?

Well, there are four reasons we haven’t yet seen hyperinflation:

Click here to continue reading Mr. Fitzgerald’s article.

Unlike some stockpickers and newsletter analysts, who proudly trumpet all their winners, while shuffling the losers under the rug, I have no problem admitting when my calls go against me.

And to the delight of all the naysayers, this happened just a couple of days ago when gold prices shot to a record high. That triggered my sell-stop and, rather than let my pride come before a fall and hang on, it’s time to move on.

Don’t get me wrong, though… I’m still convinced that the yellow metal could suffer a correction for three main reasons…

• So far, inflation hasn’t reared its ugly head. If it stays in hiding much longer, disillusioned investors will probably head for the exits.
• If the U.S. economy recovers quicker than expected, investors will be inclined to abandon the safe haven of gold and reinvest in equities.
• The technicals point to a drop. The last four times gold spiked near or above $1,000 per ounce, it quickly (and sometimes precipitously) corrected.

However, giving into these convictions – and doubling down on gold – would mean abandoning two core investing disciplines that I swear by – position sizing and trailing-stops…

Have You Considered Using Trailing Stops & Position Sizing?

I know… you’ve heard about them countless times before. But indulge me for a moment, as I explain an aspect of both trailing stops and position sizing that you’ve probably never considered…

• When I speak at investment conferences, I always like to ask people to share their biggest loser. Heads go down and nary a hand rises.
• Conversely, when I ask them to share their biggest winner, it’s like I just offered free candy to an auditorium full of kindergarteners. Everyone’s hand shoots up and there’s a chorus of anxious, “Oohs!”

Nobody likes to talk about losing investments. Instead, we want to thump our chest over the latest 1,000% gainer. The reason for that is obvious, so let’s focus on the fear about talking about our losers.

Many investors turn their biggest loser into a total loss. Instead of employing a trailing-stop and exiting a trade as the price tumbles, they make it a long-term investment to save face. Or worse, they invest more at lower prices. Most times, the stock goes belly up and they lose even more.

Even the professionals can’t claim immunity here.

• For instance, take Bill Miller, the famous manager of the Legg Mason Value Trust Fund (LMVFX). Although Miller beat the S&P 500 for 15 consecutive years, he refused to man up to his mistakes when the market took a nosedive in 2008. He kept averaging down in stocks like Countrywide, Bear Stearns, Freddie Mac (NYSE:FRE), Merrill Lynch, Washington Mutual (OTC:WAMUQ) and AIG.
• He revealed the true depth of his arrogance when he was asked how he knew when to stop buying a falling stock. “When we can no longer get a quote,” he replied. In other words, the only price at which he was unwilling to buy more was zero.

Here’s my point…

Avoid Losses With A Position Sizing & Trailing Stop Discipline

When I joined The Oxford Club, I immediately stopped worrying about my losses. That’s because we religiously adhere to a 25% trailing-stop discipline and a position size of no more than 4% in any one investment. Thus, losses are always contained.

The beauty of such a simple, disciplined approach is two-fold…

• The results add up, decidedly on the plus side. Case in point: The independent Hulbert Financial Digest has ranked The Oxford Club newsletter (The Communiqué) among the top five in the nation. That’s based on 10-year returns, too.
• A trailing-stop and position sizing policy allow me to keep making bold calls without regret. The bolder they are, the smaller my position size.

For instance, for my short gold call, I only invested 2%. For a hypothetical $100,000 portfolio, that means investing  $2,000 and losing $500, or less than 1% of the total portfolio value.

Bottom line: I don’t ever let an investment turn into an unacceptable loss. And I never put too many eggs in one basket. Sure I might lose 25% here or 25% there, but when I keep my position sizes small, in the grand scheme of things, it’s no big deal.

Such a strategy leaves me with plenty of capital to re-deploy and keep gunslinging. And while gold didn’t work out, some other contrarian bets are already making up for the loss and then some.

• Take Sotheby’s (NYSE: BID), for example. Back in June, I advised readers to buy shares when everyone else believed the market for investing in fine art was going into a long hibernation. The fundamentals faltered, but they didn’t collapse. As a result, Sotheby’s rallied 68% from my entry point.
• Then there’s my recommendation last Thursday to buy into the beleaguered retail sector with hhgregg (NYSE: HGG). It’s up 5.7% since then.

If I take profits on both now, my misstep by shorting gold doesn’t even matter.

The Critical Component to a Disciplined Investment Approach: Accountability

But of course, a disciplined investment approach is useless without the critical component of accountability… In terms of position sizing, there’s only one person who can keep you honest: Yourself.

But when it comes to implementing trailing-stops, multiple options exist…

• A So-So Option: Enter the stop levels with your broker. However, this is not ideal. Market makers can manipulate prices to trigger these stops.
• A Better Option: Use a service like TradeStops (www.tradestops.com). For a nominal annual fee, it will alert you via text message and/or e-mail when your stocks hit their trailing-stops.
• The Best Option: Excuse my bias, but the best value for your money is The Oxford Club. We constantly remind you about position sizing and more importantly, notify you immediately when we hit a stop-loss or trailing-stop. And our members keep each other honest.

In addition, membership also comes with a constant stream of high quality, profitable recommendations. And they make up for the occasional downer, like my short gold recommendation! To find out more, take a few minutes to read our report on how it all works.

Good investing,

Louis Basenese

Source: Two Tips to Avoid Letting a Bad Stock Sucker-Punch You

Yesterday, it touched a new record – $1,050 – even as the dollar rose, oil slumped under $70 and stocks dipped very slightly.

Well, what do you expect? The United States added $1 trillion to its monetary base in the last year or so. The federal government is running a deficit of $1.7 trillion this year. And along comes Barack Obama with an idea to stimulate employment – spend more money! This time, Obama’s plan is a kind of ‘Cash for Workers’ program…in which businesses get a tax credit for hiring new employees.

Gold investors must think the new program will be the straw they’ve been waiting for. Government has piled on bales of costly new initiatives on this poor camel’s back. Still, he stands up straight.

So, is gold at $1,000 a bargain…or a trap? Or both.

We begin by asking: where’s the inflation? We don’t see any inflation. What we do see is deflation.

Barclays Capital says gold could go to $1,500. We don’t know where they got that number. It could go to $15,000 for all we know. Or it could go down, too.

Our guess is that it will go down enough scare the bejesus out of speculators. Then, it will soar.

But, hey, we’re just guessing – along with everyone else.

Sooner or later gold is probably headed to the lunatic moon. We’re sticking with the yellow metal. We don’t want to miss that ride.

But when?

Ah…we’re going to stick our necks out and say “eventually.” We’re sure we’re right about this. Just don’t ask us for more precision; we have none. And what bothers us is that between eventually and now there could be a lot of time and a lot of trouble. And one trouble that could come up pretty fast is another crash in the stock market.

If the stock markets of the world take another dive…like they did last year…gold will probably go down with them. Not as much, but down nonetheless. So, if we were speculating…we’d probably be short gold and short stocks too. We’d bet against bonds too – even though we think they will probably go up in the short run. The smart, long term money – in both stocks and bonds – is probably on the short side.

Here at The Daily Reckoning, however, we never speculate – except in print. As to ideas about how the world works we have plenty. We speculate daily. As to gold, stocks and commodities, we prefer to hold onto our long-term positions.

What seems fairly sure to us is that this recovery is a fraud. It’s a mountebank and a flimflam.

And now approaches a moment of truth – earnings announcements. Stock market investors bid up shares on the theory that sales and profits would rise. Will they? We don’t think so.

We think sales are going to be disappointing…and earnings will be even worse. If so, we’ll see analysts begin to change their expectations…and announce that the results are “not as bad as expected.”

If we get a few really bad announcements – with results much worse than expected – it could sink the rally. Then again, if we’re surprised with exceptionally good reports…it could send the market in the other direction.

Good results will also cause us here at The Daily Reckoning to question our position. Maybe the economy is not sinking into a chronic depression, after all. Could we be wrong?

Ha ha…are you kidding, dear reader? Of course, we can be wrong. When we were younger we were uncertain about things. But now that we’re older, we’re not so sure.

Here is what we’re pretty sure about:

1) The credit cycle has topped out.

Americans are saving – think of the poor boomers, 10 years older but not a penny richer than they were in 1999. Stocks have gone nowhere but down in real terms. Houses hit a high in 2006…now, they’re off 30%…and still going down. Jobs? Forget it…there are already 15 million people who are unemployed and about 200,000 more every month. The job market is unlikely to recover for another 6-13 years – that is, after many of the boomers are retired! And if you are lucky enough to have a job, you’re not likely to get a raise…not with so much spare capacity in the labor market.

Under those conditions, a consumer boom is very unlikely.

2) We know that a period of credit contraction is deflationary.

Prices go down as demand falls. Buyers disappear from the malls that once knew them, while the factories that produce stuff grow dusty and quiet.

But we know the feds hate falling prices. And we know they are taking extraordinary actions to get prices to go up. So far, their efforts have been a giant flop. Prices are falling in the United States at the fastest pace since the ’50s.

Most of the feds’ efforts have been directed towards keeping the bankers fat and happy…and getting themselves a bigger share of America’s output. They took funds designed to relaunch the US economy, for example, and used them to buy themselves a big position in the auto industry, the financial industry and the insurance industry.

3) We know too, by the way they conducted themselves in those affairs, that the feds have become much more aggressive…throwing their weight around in the private sector as never before.

What we don’t know is how this affects markets in the short term. So far, consumer prices are falling, but the stock market is enjoying a bounce. It is a real, new bull market? Or just a bear market bounce? It is probably a bear market bounce…but it has been going for long enough that we have to at least consider the idea that it is a genuine bull market. That’s why the numbers from this quarter are important…they’ll tell us if the companies themselves are expanding earnings fast enough to justify investors’ optimism.

4) We know too that there is a whole lot of ’flation going on.

We are just unable to tell you what kind of ’flation it is. The monetary base is way up – it increased by $1 trillion in the last 12 months. But the money-in-circulation has barely budged. The feds give the banks overnight loans at practically zero interest. Then, the banks lend it back to the feds at nearly 4% more.

What happens to it then? Well, what do you think…it is wasted on typical federal government scams and humbugs.

So, relatively little of the money actually ends up in the consumer economy. And so, we can’t tell you whether the ’flation will have a ‘in’ prefix or a ‘de’ prefix. They’re just two letters. But they will make a whole alphabet of difference to the economy and to your investments.

5) Most important, we are dead sure that the people running America’s financial policies are jackasses.

We say that with all due respect, which is probably not much. They have only one idea – and it is a bad one. They think economies are improved by more consumer spending. They don’t seem to care why consumers occasionally cut back on their spending. All that matters to them is finding ways to get the consumer shopping again. So they try tax cuts and government spending…bailouts and boondoggles…zero interest lending and federal takeovers…cash for clunkers, cash for houses, cash for employees….

…trillions worth of claptrap and folderol. But what a nuisance! The fool consumer still won’t shop!

But they’re determined to keep trying. That’s why we can be pretty sure that, eventually, they’ll get inflation rates up. One way or another. And then, gold at $1000 will seem like an outrageous bargain.

Until tomorrow,

Bill Bonner

Source: Gold Touches a New Record

Yesterday evening, I had the courage to do something I have not done in a long time. I opened my 401(k) statement. It was a brave, bold move that made me ponder doubling up on my blood-pressure medicine before ripping the seal off the envelope.

In the end, my ticker was fluttering with beats of joy: up 33% so far this year.

My decision to overweight the small-cap sector in March paid off.

Even with those strong gains, the long-term trend line shows my heart is going to have to keep pumping for a couple extra years before my wife and I are going to retire in paradise. Most retirement accounts, mine included, are nowhere close to where they were 24 months ago.

As the recipient of a defined-contribution plan, my retirement savings are in my hands. That is not the case for the folks still holding defined-benefit plans. These pensions, once considered a low-risk path towards a reliable retirement income, are becoming far riskier than many workers ever imagined.

As corporate balance sheets crumble under the weight of massive debt loads and reduced revenues, many companies are having a tough time coming up with their required pension payments.

Read through the financial rags and you will see companies are unleashing new shares of stock just to cover their obligations, skipping payments and backing out of pension obligations all together. It is not good news for the folks that depend on the funds to put food on their table.

It is also equally not good for those of us that rely on the equities markets.

More trouble ahead

Look at it this way. Institutional investors are responsible for about 20% of total equity assets. Out of that $20 trillion or so, pension funds are responsible for 40% of the trades. That is a lot of cash.

Unfortunately, many corporate and government plans are underfunded, meaning they have some major catching up to do.

A recent study shows over 20% of funds have “significantly higher” required contributions coming up. In many of those cases, the obligations add up to an increase of 50% or more.

That’s a big problem when many of those companies and governments are fighting just to make their weekly payroll.

There is no doubt we will see a wave of payment defaults in the near future. That means less money – much less money – will flow into the nation’s equity markets.

It is still too early to tell just how badly this will impact the markets, but there is no question it will be significant.

Dow 14,000 once again? Not anytime soon if corporation pensions fall apart.

Source: Ready to Retire? Think Again

As always, the drama’s in the details. “Cash for clunkers” was by far the biggest driver of new spending, almost single-handedly pumping up durable goods orders 5.8%. Interestingly, August’s rise was the biggest since October 2001 — right after Sept. 11, when retailers slashed prices and President Bush urged us to go shopping and “Get down to Disney World.” Heh… looks like only government decree can whip us into such consumption frenzies.

And for our 1.3% leap in spending, American incomes rose just 0.2%. In fact, when adjusted for inflation and taxes, what the government calls “real disposable income” actually fell 0.2%. What’s more, we as the collective “consumer” spent over $129 billion more in August, but chose to save $112 billion less. Savings as a percentage of personal income is now down to 3%, from 4% in July.

This “indicates economic improvement”? Must be reading the wrong release…

Source: Spending Soars, Savings Suffer

Although I have great sympathy for the deflation crowd, given the reckless attitude of the central bankers and their ability to create debt-based money, I do not believe deflation (contraction in the supply of money and total debt) is very likely.

For sure, in this post-bubble environment, American consumer debt continues to contract, but this is being more than offset by the expansion in federal debt. Over the past year alone, federal debt in America has surged from US$9.645 trillion to US$11.813 trillion. In other words, during the past twelve months, American federal debt has risen by a shocking 24.47% and it now stands at 83.52% of GDP! Now, given the ability of the American establishment to essentially create dollars out of thin air, I have no doubt in my mind that it be able to inflate the economy. However, this will come at a huge cost and the victim will be the American currency.

In fact, the recent weakness in the US dollar is a sign that central-bank sponsored inflation has started to dominate the private-sector debt contraction in the West. Furthermore, over the past few weeks, various governments have issued US dollar-denominated debt and this suggests that the carry-trade is back in vogue. In a startling move, Germany recently announced that it plans to borrow money in US dollars!

Now, given the ongoing federal debt inflation, debasement of paper currencies, sky-high budget deficits and competitive currency devaluations, the macro-economic environment has never been better for precious metals. Yet, both gold and silver continue to frustrate the bulls by staying below the record-highs recorded in spring 2008.

So, what is going on here? Have we already seen the end of the precious metals bull-market or are we about to witness an explosive rally? Before I attempt to answer this question, I want to make it clear that even though gold failed to better its all-time high during last autumn’s panic, it was the only asset, (apart from US Treasuries) which stayed relatively firm. And looking at the various markets today, gold is the only asset that is flirting with its all-time high. So, whether you like it or not, gold deserves some credit for fulfilling its role as a safe haven.

Now, unlike some of the die-hard gold bugs, I don’t believe that gold is the ultimate asset to own at all times. Without a doubt, there have been times in history when gold has proven to be a lousy investment. For instance, between 1980 and 2001, the nominal price of the yellow metal fell by an astonishing 70%. This horrible price action spawned an entire generation who grew up hating gold and up until a few years ago, the vast majority considered gold a barbaric relic.

However, during other periods in history, when macro-economic uncertainty was high and inflationary expectations were running out of control, gold turned out to be a fantastic asset to own.

If my take on the macro-economic situation is valid, then we are in such a period now and gold must form a part of every investment portfolio.

You may remember that over the past year, central banks have injected trillions of dollars into the banking system and it is only a matter of time before inflationary expectations start spiraling out of control. Up until now, this ‘stimulus’ money hasn’t permeated through the economy in the West but once money velocity picks up, prices will start rising and the investment community will become very concerned about inflation. When the deflation scare abates and people start protecting the purchasing power of their savings, capital will start to flow towards precious metals.

Long-term clients and subscribers will recall that about two years ago, I highlighted gold’s tendency to rocket higher every other year. Figure 1 captures this trend perfectly and you can see that since the outset, gold’s bull-market has been punctuated by lengthy consolidations and the yellow metal has surged to a new high every alternate year.

Figure 1: Is gold about to shine?

So, if gold remains in a bull-market and its trend consistency is intact, its price should surge over the following months. Conversely, if the price of gold fails to climb above its all-time high before year-end, it should start to ring alarm bells as this would open up the possibility that the bull-market may be over. Remember, certainty does not exist in the investment world and savvy investors should remain open to all outcomes.

Now, given the uncertainty in the world today and the ticking inflationary time-bomb, my view is that gold will soon embark on its north-bound journey. So, I suggest that investors hold on to gold and the related mining companies which will probably continue to perform well until next spring.

As far as silver is concerned, it has always been a high-beta play on the direction of gold. If the next up leg in gold’s bull-market materialises, the price of silver will also head towards the heavens. Accordingly, investors may also want to allocate a portion of their investment portfolio to silver bullion and silver producing companies.

Regards,

Puru Saxena

Source:Inflation is Our Future

Not to crunch too many metaphors right here at the top, but a consensus seems to be firming up in the animate jello of the Internet that we have entered the Season of the Witch. An odor of ripeness fills the virtual air — something between dead carp and apples baking.

Whatever else appears to be going on in the upper stories and verdigris-tinged turrets of capital finance — currency rackets, gold switcheroos, interest rate arbitrage games, concealment of losses under rugs and behind curtains, Chinese fire drills performed by Spanish prisoners, executive three-card-monte set-ups, boardroom work-arounds, accounting quicksteps, Peter-to-Paul-shuffles, check kitings, pigeon drops, Ponzi schemes, hugger-muggers, bezels, shucks, jives, and enough monkeyshines to make Lord Greystroke cry for mercy — apart, in other words, from business-as-usual, such as it is these days, on Wall Street, there is a rising collective sense of anxious expectation that things are about to shake loose in the sad-ass shell of what remains of our economy. And the most perplexing part is that there hardly seems any safe place to preserve one’s savings.

The showmen over at the Financial Sense website, have put on an excellent month-long series of interviews and debate podcasts between leading inflationistas and deflationistas — Daniel Amerman, Peter Schiff, Robert Prechter, Mark Faber, Michael “Mish” Shedlock, Harry Dent — and after weeks of sedulous listening I still remain flummoxed as to where to stash the dwindling cash.

Harry Dent was a curious case in point this week. He has made some howlingly wrong calls before (e.g. in 2006, predicting a Dow 40,000 at the conclusion of the post-2001 bubble). Perhaps he missed the crack-up aspect of the most recent boom. He did not foresee the long gruesome meltdown of late 2007 to March 2009, or rather, his timing was off, since he called for the commencement of a new Great Depression in 2010. (And I hasten to insert here that my own timing of events has not been so great either.) Anyway, Dent sees a “winter” of finance and economy looming from here forward, characterized by extreme deflation, based on his view that the amount of private debt going bad (est. $40 trillion) far outweighs government’s ability to create new “money” (a few measily trillion) and hence that there is no chance in hell we’ll find ourselves in an inflationary situation for some time ahead. The private debt workout has to be completed first.

Most curious, though, was when the interviewer, Jim Puplava, probed Dent about his views on Peak Oil. Dent said he didn’t believe in it; that when he was in college in the 1970s (remember the OPEC oil embargo of ‘73), he learned to disregard any suggestions that we are “running out of oil.” He stated this, by the way, as a simple assertion, without any further explanation, and Puplava didn’t belabor him with arguments. But it was a weird moment. Of course, it hardly need be said that Peak Oil story has never been about “running out of oil” per se, but rather about declining flows, geopolitical management of flows, and the effects of depletion on industrial economies — in particular the effect on regular, expected, cyclical “growth” of the type that financial markets utterly depend on to power the trade in investment paper.

It is exceedingly odd that this does not factor into Dent’s thinking, because what Peak Oil inescapably does is introduce the very sobering idea of discontinuity — that is, that the game has changed radically, especially where all our assumptions about continued “growth” are concerned. In that brief exchange on Peak Oil, Dent seemed to take the position that the “winter” part of any historical financial cycle always produced “new technology” that invariably saves the day, putting this seemingly very smart man in the camp of so many techno-cornucopian triumphalists all wishing for the same outcome: that some mythical “they” will “come up with” a set of rescue remedies to keep all the cars circulating on the freeways, and all the WalMarts groaning with swag.

Like so many major league prognosticators, Dent arrives at his ideas by building models of reality, assembling “data” to create charts of trends in prices, interest rates, and especially demographics – what age group of people are buying a lot of what in which stage of their lives. The whole business seems very rational and reasonable except when you realize that it is just another “narrative” — to borrow one of Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s terms — girded with statistical justification. One can hardly fault it from a strictly procedural point of view — since, in our culture, conclusions ought to proceed from evidence — but one can’t escape the feeling that it amounts to little more than old-fashioned augury… that someone examining the entrails of a dead chicken, spread over the front page of The Wall Street Journal, might arrive at very similar conclusions. All that said, Dent was an appealingly confident personality on-the-air, the kind of authoritative voice you’d like to believe, if only it were possible.

Prechter was much the same a few weeks earlier, and he, too, foresees a darker American future, based on a different set of models called Elliot Wave principles. His forecasts derive from a picture of “social mood” as much as economic data flows. He, too seems to disregard the Peak Oil story and its implications as the master resource driving growth in industrial economies.

Personally, I am not at all sure that the Peak Oil story, or its associated general resource scarcity story, will shed a whole lot of light on the question of inflation-or-deflation. I say this because I think it is a short way down the road of depletion-and-scarcity before the major complex systems we depend on for daily life become so unstable that general socio-economic collapse ensues. After all, capital finance is only one of these many complex systems — some other biggies being food production, trade and manufacture, transportation, electric power distribution, infrastructure maintenance, the military, and governance. Inflation-or-deflation will only be symptomatic of larger failures and instabilities in these systems necessary for modern, civilized life.

All of it begs the question not only whether you or I will have two nickels to rub together, or two gold eagles, or a bundle of six month US Treasury bills, or a zillion shares of Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), or a gainful vocation, or a roof over our heads, or a hot meal at the end of the day, or a safe place to sleep, or a country we can recognize. I’ve done my share of forecasting, with some episodes of notably bad timing. I don’t do it for grandstanding effect but to provide some basis for knowing what to do in the years directly ahead, so we can hope to construct lives worth living. I’m impatient with models, charts, and statistical analysis. Perhaps this is childish. I’d rather tell a story or paint a picture. So, I’m going to spend the rest of the week finishing the last chapter of World Made By Hand Two: The Witch of Hebron while the US economy wanders where it will.

Regards,
James Howard Kunstler

Source: Inflation, Deflation, Peak Oil and Complex Systems

We said we were doing some serious thinking this week. Maybe it is the season. But more and more, our thoughts become grayer. Less black. Less white. Less hard. Less soft.

A few years ago, it looked to us as though the world financial system had gone to war. We cheerfully awaited the victory parade. We figured Mr. Market would whup the feds good and hard. It hasn’t happened so far.

On one side, are the forces of a natural market correction… following a long, long period of expansion. The easier money gets, the more people tend to mis-spend and mis-invest it. Then, inevitably, their mistakes must be corrected. That’s what bear markets and recessions are for.

But the feds don’t like bear markets or recessions. And at least since Keynes outlined his general theory back in the early 20 th century, they’ve believed that they don’t have to put up with them. Keynes took a page from the Old Testament. Government should act like an enlightened Egyptian Pharaoh, he didn’t say, but should have. It should run surpluses in the fat years and deficits in the lean years… thus flattening out the pattern of boom and bust.

Pharaoh was no dope. He stored up grain for 7 years, when the harvests were bountiful. Then, when the 7 lean years came, he released the grain to the people. Problem solved.

Keynes believed that modern government could do the same thing. But Pharaoh was not running a democracy. He had no voters to answer to. So, if he wanted to store grain in the fat years, he could do so.

In theory, the US government could do the same. But in fact it never runs significant surpluses. There are too many people who want too much bread and too many circuses. And you don’t win votes by denying the voters what they want. So, in practice, the feds run deficits even in the fat years! Last year, before the downturn really started to bite, the US federal government ran the biggest deficit in history – nearly half a trillion dollars.

Now, let’s imagine how that would work for a bad Pharaoh. He would give out grain in the fat years. This would encourage farmers to produce less grain. Then, when the lean years came, Pharaoh would have no grain to give out… and the farmers would have less grain stored up themselves, since they grew less during the boom years. The famine would be worse than ever.

Then, if we can imagine that Egypt was trading with China at the time, perhaps Pharaoh could borrow grain from the Zhou dynasty to help ease the peoples’ pain. Perhaps he could mortgage the pyramids. Whatever, he – and the Egyptian people – would have been in much better position if he had done as Joseph told him in the first place… lay up stores in good times, draw then down in bad times. How difficult is that?

But Bernanke didn’t see the famine coming. Neither did Geithner. Or Greenspan. Or any of the other savants Pharaoh interpret his dreams . None of them expected hard times. None of them warned the public. None of them encouraged the government to save money for the recession. Nassim Taleb asks why Bernanke was reappointed after he clearly failed the most critical test. But heck… the federal government is an equal opportunity employer. Employees aren’t let go just become they’re incompetent.

Anyway, getting back to our thoughts…

… it looked like a battle to us – between the forces of inflation (the feds)… and the forces of deflation (the market). But battles usually have clear winners. One side is master of the field; the other retreats. One side is victorious; the other is defeated.

Alas, some wars produce no hozannahs of success… and no wailing widows of failure. Some end in draws… or in confusion… or in disgrace and bankruptcy for both sides.

Like the bad Pharaoh, the feds saved nothing. Now, they have to try to work their Keynesian magic on credit. This puts them in a weak position; like a government that wages war on borrowed money. They can continue their campaign only as long as lenders allow them. They can’t wage the war as effectively as they’d like. Then again, maybe they can’t lose it as spectacularly as they might.

For the moment, their credit is still good. The bond market foresees an inflation rate of less than 2%. Bankers, taking money from the government, are happy to lend it back to them.

But the forces of the correction are giving up little ground. While stocks rally, the real economy remains in a funk.

“Sharp drop in start-ups,” is a news headline from yesterday. New business start-ups are a major source of new jobs. Bad omen.

Even glamour publisher Conde Nast is forced to make cut-backs. It has told employees that they may not spend more than $1,000 a night when they are travelling.

A Pimco economist says savings rates are still going up… and may exceed 8%. This represents hundreds of billions of dollars taken out of the consumer economy. Oddly, while it makes the slump worse, it also helps finance the government’s battle against it. Savers buy US debt (albeit indirectly).

So, the battle is still going on… and the outcome is still in doubt.

*** Racehorse prices are in freefall, says a report out yesterday. But collectible cars are still doing well.

Yesterday, we saw someone drive by in a huge, gaudy pink Cadillac from the 1960s. It had magnificent fins and enough chrome to stagger a blind man. In it were a middle-aged man and woman, looking very comfortable and proud. They were travelling in style… in a rolling sculpture.

Old cars are not only holding their values, they’re still going up. But not all old cars. Detroit’s muscle cars have been falling in price for the last three years. Not very green?

*** And here’s a report we received over the internet, from Aaron Trask:

“Everyone is right to fret about inflation but the “deflation scare” isn’t over yet, says Charles Nenner, founder of the Charles Nenner Research Center.

“Renowned for his cycle work, Nenner sees deflation remaining dominant until year-end and inflation not picking up for another 18 months. But that will be the start of a 30-year (yes, year) upcycle for inflation says Nenner, who spent 12 years as a market-timing consultant for Goldman Sachs.

“The investing implications of this scenario are clear: Nenner is bullish on gold for the long-term and even more bullish on gold mining stocks, which he says are currently cheap relative to bullion. After a secular decline, Treasury yields are set to rise, with Nenner predicting the 10-year yield will reach 5.50% by Spring 2013, a 45% rise from Friday’s close of 3.78%.

“What’s less clear is the timing of this trade. Nenner believes the “deflation trade” is about to reassert itself in the short-term, meaning strength in the dollar and Treasuries, and weakness in commodities and equities, as we’ll discuss in more detail in a forthcoming segment.

“For those who believe the dollar is doomed, Nenner notes “all currencies are bad.” In other words, currency trading will be a game of relative bets vs. a one-way trade against the greenback, as so many expect.”

Until tomorrow,

Bill Bonner

Source: The Battle Continues

That means interest rates will remain at artificially low levels for some time to come.

And it also means the central bank’s policymaking arm, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), has finally and firmly cemented its role as the Keynesian death panel for the savers of America.

The malign influence of the late economist John Maynard Keynes is nowhere more destructive than it is in the area of saving. After all, it was Keynes who proclaimed that his ideal economy would see “the euthanasia of the rentier” – an abolishment of the class of people who live off of income from savings.

We know that Keynes’ theories are still rampant in choosing U.S. fiscal policy, which has given us the largest peacetime budget deficit in history. Wednesday’s statement by the central bank’s policymaking Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) shows that the monetary sector is enthralled by Keynes’ destructive views. As savers and investors, it’s about time we got a voice in this. After all, it’s entirely possible that we don’t want to be killed – not even mercifully – by the FOMC’s zero interest-rate policy and its erosion of our savings.

The current economic situation has the United States in an embryonic – but unmistakeable – recovery. Commodities prices are soaring and the U.S. stocks, as measured by the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, are up 55% from their March 9 low.

If you were setting monetary policy for such a country, you’d surely make it only moderately stimulative, because the dangers of soaring commodities prices and what looks very much like a stock market bubble are considerable. With the “core” consumer price index (CPI) having risen 1.4% in the last 12 months, that would suggest a Federal Funds target of somewhere in the 2%-3% range. That would constitute a “real” short-term interest rate of 0.6%-1.6%, just below the neutral level of about 2%.

Needless to say, the Fed has a problem.

A No-Win Proposition for Savers

If it moved interest rates back to the appropriate rate quickly, it would cause a huge market panic: A move of 2% or more in the Federal Funds target would hit hard at the market’s confidence.

However, it could begin moving in that direction, perhaps by raising the target by a quarter percentage point – which would take it to a range of 0.25%-0.50%. That would not tighten policy much, but would indicate the Fed’s intention to tighten it in the future.

The market reaction would be considerable; if it knew higher interest rates were coming, the stock market would slow its ascent and commodity prices would stop soaring. The latter would be very good news, indeed, for the U.S. economy and for U.S. consumers generally.

By taking the opposite view, and nailing itself to the zero interest rate policy, the Fed has made it very difficult to raise interest rates when it needs to, which will be pretty soon.  However, there’s another effect – this one affecting savers – which will do even more long-term damage.

Commentators have for years been bemoaning the low U.S. savings rate, pointing out that it causes the U.S. balance-of-payments deficits, making us beholden to China, the Middle East and other places that may or may not be our friends. However, my question is, why the hell should anybody save if they don’t get paid to do so?

In this environment, savers get ripped off in three ways:

• First, they get almost nothing on their savings, except by taking lots of risk.

• Second, the value of their savings gets eaten away by inflation. That’s only 1.4% currently at the “core” level, which purposely excludes more-volatile food-and-energy prices (more on that in a moment). And that’s only if you believe the “official” figures, which I don’t entirely – they’ve been tweaked much too often. However, the rise in commodity prices, the weakness in the U.S. dollar and the beginnings of economic recovery suggest that inflation will be considerably higher in the months ahead. And that’s even if you don’t include the “volatile” food-and-energy prices, as the government doesn’t (Though it should: Real people can’t live their lives without consuming food and energy, and thusly suffer from “real” – and not “core” – inflation).

• Third, after they’re received very little on their money and had their money eaten away by inflation at rate that exceeds their savings return, those savers still have to pay income tax on interest and dividends, even when those returns don’t make up for the inflationary erosion of capital.

The Fed has been running a monetary policy that rips off savers since 1995. That means that the central bank has spent the last 14 years pushing up the money supply at a rate that greatly exceeds nominal gross domestic product (GDP).

So it’s not at all surprising that people don’t save much; they’re being paid not to do so. The Fed’s policy is very convenient for all those who borrow money – from the big banks and investment banks to the homeowners who took out too large a mortgage and can’t service it.

In other words, it’s become a very one-sided game.

Three Strategies for Savers

As savers, we can take several steps. We can agitate, like the “tea party” protesters. It’s about time U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke stopped basking in his approval by all the Keynesians and felt the anger of real people, whose savings he is destroying.

Apart from that, we can invest in a way that gets around Bernanke’s machinations. Three moves in particular make a lot of sense:

• First, we should save as much as possible tax-free, since the tax system discriminates against us. So max out IRA contributions, education funds, and any other investments that shield part of your holdings from the taxman’s bite.

• Second, we can put our money outside Bernanke’s reach – in foreign markets. The European Central Bank (ECB) at least mildly cares about savers, and has pursued a more careful policy than the Fed. Within the EU, Germany is recovering nicely, partly because it had very little fiscal stimulus, and has almost no inflation. Outside the EU, Japan and Korea are both recovering nicely, and so are worth looking at, as their policies are at least independent. (Japan, under the previous government, had a Bernanke-like determination to ignore the needs of its savers. But that may have changed under the new government).

• Finally, we savers can engage in the ultimate Bernanke protest, and buy gold, silver or the shares of mining companies. Once the Fed reverses its policy, these will be rotten investments. But it’s pretty clear that the Fed is not going to give savers an even deal soon. In that case, if the Fed doesn’t reward us, gold and silver will. The dollar will decline, and gold and silver prices will rise, until eventually the Fed is forced to act. But my bet is the Fed will move very slowly, so we’ll get plenty of warning.

We savers have rights, too. And we also have money.

It’s about time we invested it where its enemies can’t erode it.

Source: The New ‘Death Panel’ for Savers

Today, we light a candle and try to interpret the shadows on the wall…

Yesterday, the Dow fell 81 points. Gold dropped $5 to $1009.

Will the feds succeed in causing inflation? Or will they fail? Will the dollar continue to go down? Or will it prove to be a safe haven currency in a time of deflationary trouble?

According to the papers, the feds have already done it. “Fed says recovery underway,” says a headline from yesterday’s press.

Another headline tells us that the feds are considering how and when to ease themselves out of their interventions. But what would the economy look like after they stopped meddling? Just look at auto sales. People bought cars when the feds bribed them to do so. When the bribes stopped, so did car sales. Now, the clunker program has ended and spiders are busy building their webs in showrooms again. Sales fell 38% from August to September… to a 28-year low.

House sales too have been goosed up by the feds’ tax credits. According to an estimate we reported yesterday, 350,000 new house sales since January were assisted by federal intervention – about 80% of the total. What will happen when this program ends in November? Hey… let’s guess… uh… housing sales will fall, right?

And speculators are worried about what will happen when the feds stop their intervention in the financial industry, scheduled for December. Thanks to taxpayer money, the bankers were spared the consequences of their own stupidity. Instead, taxpayers will pay for their mistakes. No one is particularly upset about it. The taxpayers don’t know what is going on. And bankers are happy to continue living in the style to which they have become accustomed. Reuters reports:

“You wouldn’t know it by his pay stubs, but Jiang Jianqing heads the world’s largest bank.

“Jiang, chairman of Indus trial and Commercial Bank of China, made just $234,700 in 2008. That’s less than 2 percent of the $19.6 million awarded to Jamie Dimon, chief executive of the world’s fourth-largest bank, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

“The contrast illustrates the massive differences in pay among the CEOs of the world’s top banks. The compensation of the CEOs of the largest U.S. banks towers above what’s paid to banking chiefs in other parts of the world, according to a Reuters analysis of pay at the 18 biggest banks by market value.

“The United States is home to four of the nine largest banks in the world — JPMorgan, Bank of America Corp, Wells Fargo & Co and Citigroup Inc. It is also home to four of the six most handsomely rewarded bank CEOs.

“China, for example, boasts three of the world’s four biggest banks, yet the leaders of those banks — Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, China Construction Bank Corp and Bank of China — are among the lowest paid of those surveyed by Reuters. The chairman and the president of each of the banks are paid roughly $230,000 per year.”

If America’s make-believe capitalists want to pay their CEOs exorbitant wages, that’s their business. A pox on all of them. But in come the feds… and now we’re all paying the price. And if the program ends in December, as scheduled, we’ll get to see how far the economy goes without taxpayers’ money in the gas tank. Let’s see… it comes to a complete stop?

But no matter how malign and imbecilic the feds are, the public is rooting for them. People think Bernanke has avoided a ‘second great depression,’ and that the government has rescued the economy. Now they see nothing but clear highway ahead… perhaps with a little bump from time to time.

What’s ahead? We don’t know. Neither does anyone else. There is no precedent. Never before has a major central bank reacted so recklessly to a market correction. Never before has the monetary base exploded so violently. Never before have so many people with so many bills to pay had to face such a downturn.

But amid all the confusion, uncertainty and noise… your editor is calmly, cheerfully and confidently awaiting a depression. Yes, dear reader, we don’t know what markets will do. We don’t know how much gold will sell for next year… or what the actual GDP will be. But when we look at the shadows… we have a strong hunch that we are entering a depression… and that we won’t get out of it soon.

That said, we caution readers not to expect soup lines or people selling apples on the street corners. This is a depression à la 21 st century. A depression with Iphones and Twitter. This is NOT your grandfather’s depression.

It’s not your grandfather’s depression, but it has many elements that your grandfather would recognize. This from David Rosenberg:

“FRUGALITY THEME IS SECULAR, NOT JUST CYCLICAL

We came across two articles that truly resonated on this score — about how U.S. households are changing their entire approach to the family budget and this transformation cuts a wide swath on a socio-demographic basis. See Census: Recession Had Sweeping Impact on U.S. Life on Bloomberg news (by Hope Yen) as well as Consumer Spending Cuts Reach Across Incomes in the Associated Press business news section (by Eileen Connelly).”

With so much noise… and so many distortions… it’s hard to tell what is really going on… and impossible to know how the markets will react. Still, there are some patterns that make sense. After a long period of credit growth, credit is now shrinking. At least in the private sector. And that is not likely to change. Well, it’s not likely to change unless the Fed goes nuclear. If they push the hyperinflation button, the whole picture changes radically and immediately. But that’s not likely to happen any time soon… so let’s ignore it for the present.

What we have before us now is a consumer economy where the consumer is cutting back. Despite the odd shadow shapes on the wall, that means a slowdown in hiring, business revenues and real prices… and tax revenues.

New York says its budget deficit will grow to $3 billion. And over on the sunny West Coast, California is selling $8.8 billion in notes to try to close its deficit.

Apartment rents in New York City are falling. Credit card defaults hit a new record. And the Wall Street Journal says that holiday jobs in the retail sector are likely to be scarce.

All of those things are about what you’d expect.

Another thing you’d expect is a decline in America’s relative economic power and political influence. Richard Duncan, along with your editor, has been following the story. Bloomberg reports:

“Sept. 23 (Bloomberg) — U.S. budget deficits will continue to pile up in the next decade, eventually reaching an unsustainable level that may result in an economic collapse, according to Richard Duncan, author of “The Dollar Crisis.”

“The U.S. has little chance of resolving its deteriorating financial position because the manufacturing industry continues to shrink, leaving the nation with few goods to export, said Duncan, now at Singapore-based Blackhorse Asset Management.

In “The Dollar Crisis,” first published in 2003, Duncan argued that persistent current account deficits by the U.S. were creating an unsustainable boom in global credit that was destined to break down, resulting in a worldwide recession.

“The bad news is at the end of a 10-year period we’re still not going to have fixed the problem,” Duncan said in an interview in Hong Kong yesterday.

“Eventually it will lead to high rates of inflation well down the line and really destabilize things to the point where there may be irreparable damage. A kind of ‘Fall of Rome’ scenario.”

*** Fall of Rome? Hey, Addison Wiggin and your editor wrote the book on the fall of Rome idea. “Empire of Debt,” we called it. It was such a hit that the publisher asked us for a new edition… which was released this summer.

[Editor’s note: You can get Bill’s book here.]

Richard Duncan, with Bloomberg on lead guitar, was singing our song:

“The federal budget deficit will total $1.6 trillion this year, while combined shortfalls are forecast to total $9.05 trillion in the next 10 years, according to projections from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

“The U.S. has run a current account deficit every year since 1982 except one, with a peak of $788 billion in 2006. Foreign purchases of U.S. debt has propped up the dollar and allowed a credit-fueled spending boom by the nation’s consumers, according to Duncan.

“ U.S. workers are now likely to face declining wages and that may create a political backlash against free-trade policies, he said. The nation’s jobless rate jumped to a 26-year high of 9.7 percent in August, while wages logged a 2.6 percent increase from the previous year.

“As unemployment remains above 10 percent well into the foreseeable future, it won’t be long before Americans start voting for protectionism,” Duncan said.

“That’s going to be bad because protectionism will mean world trade will diminish and will overall reduce global prosperity.”

Once the U.S. debt burden becomes too large and the government can no longer sell debt to the public, the Federal Reserve will likely step in and monetize it, resulting in high levels of inflation, he said.

Source: Awaiting the Depression