U.S. crude for October delivery fell $2.20 to $69.74 by 1:24 p.m. EDT (1724 GMT) after rising to $72.90 in choppy trading. London Brent crude fell $2.10 to $67.76 a barrel.

“Crude put in a high for the week, but there was no follow-through and the dollar and S&P turned around and that helped pull crude back,” said Gene McGillian, analyst at Tradition Energy in Stamford, Connecticut.

U.S. stocks were hampered by profit taking after five days of gains and the longest winning streak since November which helped boost crude prices earlier in the week.

Analysts and traders say that current oil prices reflect attitudes in the market rather than fundamentals.

Data released Thursday by the U.S. government showed petroleum product inventories, including heating oil and gasoline, rose more than expected last week, suggesting lackluster demand.

“Fuel demand has not recovered and the market needs to see some demand after going up on sentiment,” McGillian said.

Data showed China’s crude oil imports in August surged about 25 percent to a near-record high of 19.6 million tonnes or around 4.6 million barrels.

Oil hit a year-high of $75 a barrel in late August, from below $33 in December, as global oil demand recovered.

Crude’s climb mirrored a rise in European equities <.FTEU3>, which were headed for their sixth consecutive session of gains.

Since March 9, equities and oil have traded in close correlation.

At least two rockets were fired from southern Lebanon into northern Israel, prompting an Israeli artillery response, heightening fears of regional instability and prompting earlier crude buying, traders said. No casualties were reported.

The International Energy Agency said that oil demand would rise this year and next as the global economy recovers, although it also said oil stocks in the big developed countries of the OECD were up 4.6 percent in July versus a year ago.

WEAK DOLLAR

The dollar index <.DXY>, a measure of the U.S. unit’s performance against six other major currencies, has dropped 1.9 percent in the past week. It briefly fell as low as 76.548 of Friday, its lowest level since September 2008.

Weakness in the dollar, the currency of the oil market, was a concern for the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. The group needs higher average oil prices to step up investment in new output, its secretary-general said.

The dollar’s slide has helped boost demand for crude this week, but an analyst at Commonwealth Bank said oil was unlikely to get much more upward momentum from the greenback.

“Our forecast for currencies is for dollar depreciation — a lot of that has occurred already and while depreciation has been an upside driver, that influence may be weakening,” said David Moore, commodities strategist at Commonwealth Bank in Sydney.

NEW YORK, Sept 11 (Reuters)

Saudi Arabia’s oil minister, Ali Naimi, has indicated that while demand is beginning to pick up, inventories remain dangerously high. Therefore, it would be best for the cartel to “stay its course” by continuing to adhere to previous production cuts until demand stabilizes.

After soaring above $147 a barrel last summer the price of oil tumbled more than 80% to a four-year low of $32.70 a barrel in February. To combat the sharp decline in prices, OPEC has lowered its production quotas by 4.2 million barrels per day (bpd) – about 5% of global demand – since September.

Since February, oil prices have recovered, climbing to their current level above $60 a barrel. But both Naimi and industry analysts have warned that the rally has more to do with market sentiment and the potential for a recovery than it does fundamentals.

“The price rise is a function of optimism that better things are coming in the future,” Naimi told reporters earlier this week.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates global oil consumption will fall by 2.6 million bpd this year. That would be the biggest drop since 1981.

Naimi says that world crude inventories – at current levels – would be sufficient enough to meet about 62 days of global demand. OPEC members would like to see them fall to about 52 to 54 days worth of demand.

An increase in OPEC production “will not happen until we are sure that global inventories return to their normal levels,” Naimi told the Arab daily Al-Hayat.

U.S. crude oil inventories rose to the highest level in two decades earlier this month. However, Naimi did note that demand in Asia, particularly China, seems to be accelerating and crude prices could reach $75 a barrel by the end of the year.

Still, analysts are urging caution, as production quota compliance among OPEC nations is beginning to wane. Production compliance among OPEC nations reached 85% in March – an impressive level by historical standards. Members only delivered on 78% of the promised cuts in April as prices recovered.

Saudi Arabia, OPEC’s largest and most influential producer, actually pumped below its target level in April, but other members have been cheating. Iran, OPEC’s second-biggest producer, accounted for 410,000 bpd of the overproduction last month, while Angola exceeded its target by 170,000 bpd and Venezuela overproduced 130,000 bpd the IEA reported.

“Lagging quota compliance by the non-Gulf Arab states – hovering around 50% – has hamstrung any real discussion of a potential cut to accelerate the drawdown of the glut,” PFC Energy analyst David Kirsch said in a report today. “Purported requests by Angola to revise or suspend its quota, as well as moves by Venezuela to certify a higher production figure leave any proposal for further output restraint effectively stillborn.”

Source: OPEC to Maintain Production Levels at Thursday Meeting

And while there remains a risk that prices will retreat further due to sluggish demand, there are also three very compelling reasons why oil is still a safe long-term bet:

• OPEC has made substantial progress in reducing the amount of oil on the market.
• The dollar has been made vulnerable by the U.S. Federal Reserve’s aggressive policy of quantitative easing.
• And low oil prices and tight credit have reduced global energy investment, putting future supply at risk.

There’s no question that downside risk remains. On April 13, the Paris-based International Energy Agency (IEA) lowered its demand forecast by 1 million barrels a day, and now expects the world will use about 83.4 million barrels per day in 2009. That would be 2.4 million barrels a day, or 2.8% less than last year.

But so far dwindling demand has failed to contain oil prices.

The futures contract for benchmark crude settled at $49.66 a barrel on March 31, up 11.3% from where it ended 2008. As Money Morning predicted in its annual outlook series, the first quarter was a volatile one, in which oil prices tested the low $30s before surging over $50 in recent market rally.

And analysts are almost completely united in the view that, despite its short-term volatility, declines in production, exploration and development, and the value of the dollar will drive oil prices substantially higher in the years ahead.

OPEC Keeps a Lid on Production

The members of OPEC generated tremendous revenue from oil prices that soared over $147 a barrel last year. However, just as the world’s top oil producers began looking for ways to spend their massive stockpiles of cash, prices began a plunge that would see crude lose more than three-quarters of its value.

In a desperate effort to put a floor under oil prices, OPEC – supplier of 40% of the world’s oil – has issued three production cuts totaling 4.2 million barrels per day (bpd), or nearly 12% of its capacity, since September.

While the cuts have not yet been able to return oil prices to the group’s desired price range of $60-$70 a barrel, the cartel abstained from making any further reductions at its latest meeting in March and even voiced optimism that crude would reach $60 a barrel by the end of the year.

“That suggests to us that not only does OPEC have the firepower to support this oil price but there’s enough internal agreement between OPEC members that they can actually achieve it,” Tom Nelson, an analyst for the Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund told BusinessWeek.

Many analysts had speculated that OPEC members would ignore the quotas and continue to produce oil to generate income, thereby rendering the cuts ineffective. But OPEC’s discipline has proven many critics wrong.

Despite foot-dragging from Iran and Venezuela – two countries that rely heavily on oil revenue to fund massive social programs – OPEC has gotten about 80% compliance on the 4.2 million bpd production cut. Historically, the cartel only gets about 60% compliance on such cuts.

As of February, Saudi Arabia accounted for about 46% of the 3.4 million bpd decline in production, according to PFC Energy. And the United Arab Emirates have fully complied with their share of the cuts. Iran’s compliance by that time was only 33% and Venezuela had only adhered to half of its commitments.

Still, Abdallah El Badri, OPEC’s Secretary General, estimates the production cuts will take about 800,000 bpd of supply off the market, significantly reducing the overhang in global markets, BusinessWeek reported.

OPEC officials from Libya, Algeria, and Iraq have all said that oil prices will reach $60 a barrel by the end of the year.

“One of the reasons why OPEC felt able to roll over quotas was that they do appear to have set a floor for prices,” Mike Wittner, an analyst at Societe Generale SA (ADR: SCGLY), told Reuters. “According to a lot of the balances, including ours, if you have OPEC holding steady or cutting a bit more, you get a big, counter-seasonal stock draw in the third quarter.”

Crude Thrives on the Diving Dollar

Crude futures doubled from July 2007 to July 2008, soaring from about $74 a barrel to a record-high $147 a barrel. Much of that rise can be attributed to supply and demand, but there was another catalyst for the soaring prices that few investors recognized: The rapid decline of the dollar.

From July 2007 to July 2008 the dollar plunged 16% against the euro. And as the dollar became less valuable the cost of commodities around the world skyrocketed.

At the time, inflation – not deflation – was the predominant concern among the world’s leading economists, as a decade of low interest rates and unconstrained lending in the United States sucked the life out of the dollar. And while inflation is nowhere near the levels it reached last year, it’s important to recognize that the policies of the U.S. Federal Reserve are no less inflationary.

The Fed has cut its benchmark lending rate to a range of 0%-0.25%, and last month, Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said the central bank would purchase up to $300 billion of longer-term Treasury securities and $750 billion of mortgage-backed securities as it pursues a policy of quantitative easing.

This announcement by the Fed, along with a corresponding rise in equities, has been the driving force behind oil’s recent rally.

“[Oil prices] are being possessed by the dollar and the stock market,” Phil Flynn, an analyst at Alaron Trading Corp. told The Associated Press. “It’s not an oil market anymore. It’s a stock-currency market because that’s what we’re reacting to right now.”

Ultimately, the same fear of inflation that typically drives investors into the gold market is similarly buoying oil prices. And even though the dollar has yet to be seriously affected, there’s no ignoring the fact that its value has been imperiled.

“The recent announcement by the U.S. Federal Reserve of its intention to purchase over $1 trillion worth of government bonds and mortgage-backed securities has served to put additional pressure on the value of the dollar as this is viewed by the market as creating a lower yield and fanning the flames of inflation,” Wall Street Strategies’ senior research analyst Conley Turner told Xinhua.

The Coming Oil Price Shock

Now that a weak dollar and reduced production have bolstered oil prices, there is a growing concern about how much higher crude will climb once demand returns. Tighter lending conditions and a trough in oil prices have badly crimped investment and jeopardized future supplies.

More expensive energy projects such as oil sands have been put on hold and the number of drilling rigs at marginal shallow-water fields around the world has been scaled back to a three-year low.

Oil drilling activity dropped 43% in the 12 months through March, with year-over-year oil exploration in the United States alone down 38%. High bids for offshore drilling rights in the central Gulf of Mexico fell by more than 80% compared with last year.

OPEC has said that with oil generating substantially less revenue as many as 35 new projects could be delayed past 2013.

“I have often described unsustainably low oil prices as carrying the seeds of future spikes and volatility. In a low-price environment, the trend is often to focus on survival instead of expansion,” said Ali al-Naimi, the Saudi oil minister. “If we place a low priority on preparing for the future, that lack of action can come back to haunt us through supply shortages and another round of high prices.”

The current economic crisis could reduce future oil supply growth by 8 million bpd, according to a recent study by the Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA).

CERA now says that production will grow by just 7.5 million bpd over the next five years, down from the 14.5 million bpd increase it predicted last summer. According to the research group, as demand recovers throughout that span, production will struggle to keep up and a new commodities bull market, similar to the one seen in 2008 will begin.

“Seven consecutive years of rising oil prices – unprecedented in the history of the oil industry – have come crashing down, thus burying the notion that the commodity price cycle was a historical relic,” said the report.

CERA isn’t the only organization worried about the lack of investment in new oil projects, either. The International Energy Agency (IEA) – energy advisor to 28 industrialized nations – has also issued warnings about a coming supply crunch.

The IEA estimates daily oil demand will rise from the current level of 86 million barrels to 106 million barrels by 2030. To meet that demand, the agency estimates that the world needs $26.3 trillion in supply-side investments over the next 21 years.

China, India and other developing countries, alone, will need investments of $360 billion a year through 2030, the agency said.

About 7 million bpd of additional capacity needs to be added to the market by 2015.

“Unless sufficient companies have the will and financial ability to invest through the downcycle, there is a real risk that supply growth may lag the eventual rebound of demand, leading to substantial price increases – possibly as early as this year,” Richard Jones, the IEA’s executive director said at a recent conference in London.

Jones estimates that as much as 2 million bpd of expected new oil production has already been deferred.

The IEA predicts that, by 2015, a lack of investment and rising demand will create a “supply crunch” – that will once again send oil prices up into the triple digits.

“There remains a real risk that under-investment will cause an oil supply crunch in that time frame,” the IEA said in an executive summary of its “2008 World Energy Outlook.” “The gap between what is currently being built and what will be needed to keep pace with demand is set to widen sharply after 2010.”

The agency predicts that crude will average more than $100 a barrel from 2008 to 2015 and rise above $200 a barrel by 2030, as demand far outpaces supply.

“Every bull market in oil is really born in the zenith of a bear market,” said Alaron Trading Corp.’s Flynn. “The cutbacks we see today are going to lead to a spike somewhere in the future. The big question is when it’s going to happen.”

Source: Three Big Reasons Oil Prices Will Resume Their Rally

Oil fell more than $2 towards $34 a barrel on Monday after Russia and Ukraine signed a 10-year gas deal clearing the way for the resumption of supplies to a freezing Europe.

Implementation of a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza also eased supply concerns as the market remained under pressure from expectations that the weakening global economy would erode oil demand.

“Right now the economy is dominating,” said Harry Tchilinguirian, analyst at BNP Paribas. “The market is very volatile and the signs are that demand is weakening.”

U.S. crude oil futures for February delivery dipped to a low of $33.89, down $2.62, before recovering to trade at $34.53 by 1800 GMT.

Traders said the February U.S. crude oil futures contract, which expires on Tuesday, also fell because of very high stocks at the delivery point for the U.S. futures contract.

Only just over 3,100 lots were traded on the February U.S. crude contract. The March contract was much more active as more than 31,000 lots changed hands.

London Brent crude for March fell to a low of $43.80, down $2.77, before edging back up to around $44.50.

GAS FLOWS

The agreement between Russia and Ukraine, which set a final price for 2009 supplies, is expected to lead to the restart of flows of Russian natural gas to Europe via Ukraine within the next 36 hours.

Also easing concern about energy supplies, Israeli forces began to pull out of the Gaza Strip following a tentative truce with Hamas after the three-week war, easing tension in a region which pumps about a third of the world’s oil.

Prices came under pressure on Friday after the International Energy Agency, an adviser to industrialised countries, predicted a fall in world oil demand in 2009.

OPEC, the oil exporters’ group, has cut production three times since September to try to stem falling prices. It might consider reducing output again, Algeria’s oil minister Chakib Khelil said on Saturday.

Oil has collapsed by more than $110 a barrel since reaching a record high of $147.27 a barrel in the summer as the global economic slowdown has eroded demand and consumer spending.

Still, some in the oil market think there is little room for prices to fall much further.

“It looks as if Brent will hold in the current $40-$50 range,” said Christopher Bellew, a broker at Bache Commodities. “I do not anticipate new lows.”

LONDON, Jan 19 (Reuters)

I was standing outside of the supermarket, jostling with the bell-ringing Salvation Army guy for attention, telling shoppers, “Buy gold, silver and oil! The governments of the world are insanely creating too much money and credit to try and alleviate the inflationary ravages of all the previous decades of too much money and credit, and the result will be the tragedy of terrifying inflation and all its miseries and suffering for everyone! We’re freaking doomed, you morons, so save yourselves at least!”

Of course, the whole idea of gold and silver as a store of value is completely alien to these ignorant Earthling boobs, and I don’t bother trying to explain Peak Oil or how oil is a finite resource and how it looks like we have reached the peak of oil extraction, because it is such a long explanation that before you get a chance to explain it to them, somebody from the store always comes out and tells you that they are calling the cops unless you leave right now and stop harassing the customers, and everybody cheers.

But I now find that I can save a lot of time by just showing them an article from the Financial Times newspaper, which plainly states that “Output from the world’s oilfields is declining faster than previously thought.”

In fact, the Times said that the International Energy Agency’s annual report, the World Energy Outlook, declares that “Without extra investment to raise production, the natural annual rate of output decline is 9.1 per cent.” Yikes!

Not surprisingly, the Times says, “The findings suggest the world will struggle to produce enough oil to make up for steep declines in existing fields, such as those in the North Sea, Russia and Alaska, and meet long-term demand.” Demand will be higher than supply!

Interestingly enough, they figure that even with the forecasts of China, India and other developing countries ramping up oil-related investments totaling $360 billion every year until 2030, it will not be enough, and “even with investment, the annual rate of output decline is 6.4 per cent.” Yikes again!

And beyond this huge decline in supply, Byron King of WhiskeyandGunpowder.com notes that “According to the International Monetary Fund, Iran, Venezuela and Nigeria need oil prices above $95 per barrel just to cover their respective national budgets. Saudi Arabia requires oil prices above $75 to cover its budget. Well over half of the revenues of the Russian Federation come from taxes on hydrocarbons. Mexico gets over 40% of its federal revenues from taxes on Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex), the national oil company.”

He concludes that “low oil prices are causing problems for the oil-exporting states of the world”, which is probably why the Financial Times reports that “The Opec oil cartel yesterday cut its forecast for demand growth next year to 500,000 barrels a day, down from 800,000 b/d.”

And if that is not enough, since speculators in futures seem to be routinely slaughtered by the commercial traders, the FT also reported, “Data on hedge fund positioning from the Commodities Futures Trading Commission showed that speculators on Nymex had made their most aggressive bet on falling oil prices since November 2005.”

And, as the news just keeps getting worse, Iran just asked OPEC to cut production by a further 1.5 million barrels per day, which comes just after OPEC cut production by 1.5 million barrels last month! Yikes!

So, reanimated with a renewed sense of urgency, I go back to the supermarket, jostle the Salvation Army bell-ringer aside, and loudly reiterate my Mogambo Message To The Masses (MMTTM) “Buy oil, you morons! Buy oil! Look at this Financial Times piece if you don’t believe me, you jerks!”

Alas, I encountered the same indifference and hostility from the same shoppers, matching the sameness of the little store manager and his same tired “I’ll call the cops” refrain. Then I went home, continuing the apparent motif, the same as I always do.

But I bought more oil, which was different than usual, which is still cheap thanks to the ignorance of everyone else not buying it! Whee! This investing stuff is easy!

Source: Salvation in the Cheap Oil Army

I’ve been getting a lot of calls and e-mails from people asking about the falling prices for oil in recent weeks. The immediate explanation is that world economic activity is decelerating. Demand is falling. OPEC announced cuts in output. But the markets still believe that economic decline will trump the ability of OPEC to prop up the price of oil. Enjoy it while it lasts.

Just over the horizon, things are about to become dicey. This week, the International Energy Agency (IEA) will release a new report on the future of world energy. In its World Energy Outlook, the IEA will state categorically that “Current global trends in energy supply and consumption are patently unsustainable.”

There’s not much wiggle room in that statement. According to the IEA, despite the recent fall in oil prices, the medium- and long-term outlooks for energy supply are grim. Conventional oil output is destined to decline. Demand will still grow, however, especially in the developing world. And the twain shall only meet by prices rising to clear the market. “It is,” as our Arab friends like to say, “written.”

The IEA performed a comprehensive study of 800 of the world’s largest oil fields. And it concluded that depletion in conventional oil fields is occurring at a rate in excess of 9% per year. (That’s an average. We see depletion rates in excess of 15% in Mexico’s Cantarell field, for example.) This means that absent large amounts of new drilling, new investment in enhanced recovery and new discoveries, the current worldwide oil output will decline by over 9% per year. And if it keeps going along this trend (there’s no reason why it won’t), the base of world oil output could conceivably dry up within seven-10 years.

Don’t get me wrong. The world won’t run out of oil in seven-10 years. That’s not how it works. It’s just that volumes of conventional oil are declining. The takeaway point is that the energy markets will tighten up, like a hangman’s noose around the collective neck of the oil-consuming world. We might not quite realize it, but when it comes to oil, we are all walking that long green mile.

The investment angle for OI is that the companies that own oil reserves in the ground, and the oil service companies that extract oil and natural gas, should profit in the future. Yes, the portfolio is down. It has been a hard hit to everyone (me too) who bought into the market up until midsummer. We’ve all lived through a midsummer’s nightmare on this one.

So how long will we have to wait for this “future” to show up? Well, how long will the current worldwide recession last? I don’t know. But I do know that many energy companies in the OI portfolio are at long-term lows in share price. If you can afford to be patient with your funds, these firms should eventually stage a comeback as oil prices rise again. As I said above, “It is written.”

Says who, you ask? Written by whom? Well, how about the IEA? According to the IEA, even with massive levels of investment in the oil patch, the best estimate is that the global oil industry can reduce the rate of depletion to perhaps the 6% range. So the world energy industry will have to run faster just to keep from falling too far behind the demand curves.

Again, you need to keep in mind that current energy prices are just too low to support the level of energy investment that the world needs going forward. (Meanwhile, the U.S. government is spending trillions of dollars forward just to bail out the banks and bankers, not one of whom runs pump jacks.)

The IEA estimates that the oil industry will have to invest over $350 billion per year to counter the steep rates of decline in output. And even that will not be sufficient to maintain levels of output for traditional forms of crude oil. Thus, much of the future investment will have to go toward extracting other kinds of hydrocarbon substances.

What do I mean by “other kinds” of hydrocarbon substances? Fortunately, there are many different kinds of hydrocarbon molecules out there. The total worldwide carbon base actually adds up to a very big number, and that is NOT including the carbon that is part of the current living biology of the planet. For now I’m just discussing the fossilized carbon like oil, natural gas, bitumen in tar sands, oil shale and coal.

The big problem for the nonoil forms of carbon is affordability. That is, are people willing to pay? It takes a lot of steel and technology to transform some kinds of carbon into something we want to use. We see that, for example, in the Canadian tar sands projects. Lots of steel, concrete, labor, machinery, water and energy input – all to extract this thick, gunky crud that has to be upgraded to something that looks like diesel fuel. And the whole thing emits lots of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the process, as well.

The other big problem is whether or not there is the political will to “do carbon.” Will the governments of the world allow – let alone promote – industry to invest in the industrial base that will be required to transform the varying kinds of carbon into something that the world can use? Because the other side of this coin is ever-increasing CO2 emissions, global warming and climate change. The more carbon that gets burned, the more CO2 that goes up the flue and into the atmosphere. In essence, within about two centuries, mankind is undoing the geological work of tens of millions of years.

This is not a “global warming” article. But most nations of the developed world have governments that are more and buying into the global warming thesis more. The political gun sights are on carbon. But if we collectively decarbonize the economy, the energy supply will dry up and we’ll wish for the “good old days” when we had to worry only about Wall Street crashing. And besides, try telling the developing world not to develop. People have fought wars over lesser issues.

Do you want some numbers on hydrocarbon resources? Here are estimates of the total hydrocarbon resources in the world and the relative costs to convert them. This is my summary, based on several different government and academic compilations:

These are big numbers, right? And they can supply a lot of energy over a long time, but only if the world collectively decides to utilize the resources. If not? Well, you had better own some gold too.

The stark assessment from the IEA described above comes just as much of the world’s banking and finance system lies in ruins. Many forms of lending have dried up, and much of the former system of world commerce is just not functioning.

So the politicians, bankers and investors of the world – including us – have their work cut out.

Source: Unsustainable Energy Trends

• October sales dropped for big-name retailers Macy’s Inc. (M), Target Corp. (TGT) and Gap Inc. (GPS) a result of continuing job losses and widespread credit drought that took the spirit out of consumer spending. Same-store sales climbed 2.4% at Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT), as tight-budget shoppers searched for cheaper prices, Bloomberg reported.

• A day after forecasting a 5% to 10% annual revenue drop, Cisco Systems Inc. (CSCO) said it will invest $100 million sales to small businesses, Reuters reported. Despite a weaker global economy, Cisco said it sees a window to expand sales of routers, switches and other equipment.

• Blackstone Group LP (BX) posted its biggest quarterly loss, shedding $502.5 million in the third quarter, or 44 cents a share, Bloomberg reported. Blackstone is the world’s largest private-equity firm who went public 18 months ago, right before the credit crisis depleted the value of its holdings and made acquiring financing more difficult.

• The International Energy Agency said that import prices for crude oil will “likely” average $100 a barrel from 2008 to 2015, MarketWatch reported. The opposite happened Thursday, as December crude futures fell $3.51 to $61.77 a barrel. The official IEA 2008 Energy Outlook will be released on Nov. 12.

• Mattel Inc. (MAT) said yesterday (Thursday) it is cutting about 1,000 jobs worldwide. The maker of Barbie and Fisher Price products said the positions equate to 3% of its global work force and will reduce its professional and management staff by 8%. Mattel last month reported fiscal third-quarter profit rose less than 1% to $238.1 million.

• DirecTV Group Inc. (DTV), the nation’s largest satellite TV operator, yesterday (Thursday) announced third-quarter earnings rose 14%. The company reported net income of $363 million, or 33 cents per share, up from $319 million, or 27 cents per share, a year ago. Revenue rose 15% to $4.98 billion. Revenue in Latin America jumped 49% to $658 million.

• Fidelity Investments said yesterday (Thursday) it is cutting nearly 1,300 jobs this month, with more layoffs coming early next year. The layoff notices, set to go out later this month, amount to about 2.9% of Fidelity’s total work force of 44,400. A second round of cuts is planned for the first three months of 2009.

• The number of U.S. workers filing new claims for jobless benefits fell by 4,000 last week to 481,000, the Labor Department reported yesterday (Thursday). The department revised up its estimate for jobless claims the week prior to 485,000. The four-week moving average of claims, a less volatile measure, was unchanged at 477,000 last week.

Source: Global Investing Roundups Friday, November 7th, 2008

Oh yeah, energy.  That thing where we had a near-crisis earlier this year, but now we don’t because we’re experiencing deflation.  (Note to irony-challenged inflationists: I’m being facetious.)

I’d been aware the International Energy Agency was doing an audit of all the world’s major oil fields and its report was due soon.  Now the Financial Times has gotten its hands on an advance copy.  The numbers are freaking dire, although the FT puts its usual sober gloss on things.

Output from the world’s oilfields is declining faster than previously thought, the first authoritative public study of the biggest fields shows.

Without extra investment to raise production, the natural annual rate of output decline is 9.1 per cent, the International Energy Agency says in its annual report, the World Energy Outlook…

You read that right — 9.1%.  And if we do get that “extra investment to raise production,” the decline rate will still be 6.4%.  “The watchdog warned that the world needed to make a ’significant increase in future investments just to maintain the current level of production’.”

The IEA sees world consumption of 106.4 million barrels a day by 2030.  How exactly we get there from the present 85 million barrels a day with a decline rate of 6.4% in existing fields is left unsaid.  That’s the sort of thing that only gets discussed behind closed doors.

Source: Big Oil Fields in Shocking Decline

“Oil prices have witnessed a dramatic collapse – unprecedented in speed and magnitude,” OPEC said, adding that prices have fallen to levels that could jeopardize “many existing oil projects and lead to the cancellation or delay of others, possibly resulting in a medium-term supply shortage.”

The 1.5 million-barrel daily reduction exceeded the expectation of many analysts, but failed to rally crude prices which have plummeted 57% since hitting a record high record high of $147.27 a barrel on July 11.  Light, sweet crude for November delivery fell $3.09, or 4.55%, to settle at $64.75 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange Friday.

“The financial crisis is already having a noticeable impact on the world economy, dampening the demand for energy, in general, and oil in particular,” the cartel said. “This slowdown in oil demand is serving to exacerbate the situation in a market which has been over-supplied with crude for some time.”

On Oct. 10, the International Energy Agency (IEA) lowered its forecast for 2008 global demand growth by 250,000 barrels per day (bpd) to 440,000. The agency cut its 2009 growth forecast by 190,000 bpd to 690,000.

In its October report, OPEC reduced its forecast for 2009 demand by 190,000 barrels a day, as well. It was the cartel’s seventh-consecutive forecast reduction. OPEC said that total oil consumption in developed countries fell by more than 1 million barrels per day in the 12 months through to the end of September.

Developed nations in 2009 will need only 400,000 barrels a day more oil than this year, the cartel said, whereas demand from emerging markets will increase by an estimated 1.1 million barrels.

The cut announced Friday, effective Nov. 1, was at the high end of analysts’ expectations, but as prices continue to slide, there is now a growing sense that the reduction won’t be enough.

Addison Armstrong, director of market research at Tradition Energy in Stamford, Connecticut, told Bloomberg News that a further reduction of 500,000 barrels a day is possible.

“If prices continue to fall, they may find themselves having to revisit deeper production cuts,” Armstrong said.

OPEC President and Algerian Oil Minister Chekib Khelil said at a news conference that the cuts could reach 1.8 million barrels per day by the end of the year, which would mean an additional cut of 300,000 barrels a day, perhaps at the group’s next meeting in December. He denied that there would be any impact on inflation, or growth, if such a cut were necessary, and that the cartel would be willing to increase production should prices rebound.

With control over 40% of the world’s oil supply OPEC is the arbiter of oil prices. As such, the group walks a very fine line. If the cartel pulls the reins too hard on production, it risks a price spike that would cause demand to drop even further.

“They have to be careful of cutting production in a tough [global] economy,” Phil Flynn, analyst at Alaron Trading told The Associated Press. “They could make [falling oil demand] even worse.”

However, if OPEC overproduces, the price of oil could collapse, just is it did 11 years ago. In 1998, the price of crude skidded 28% over a 10-month period, below $10 a barrel, after OPEC raised quotas in the face of the Asian financial contagion. Oil prices that low make it unprofitable for corporations to begin new projects or seek out new oil sources.

A lack of exploration and development would make the world vulnerable to an energy shock when the global economy regains traction and demand picks back up. In fact, many analysts believe that even at current prices enough projects will be delayed, and enough investment curtailed, to spur a serious rebound in oil prices within the next few years.

Barclays Capital, for one, said the world faces “a serious supply-side crunch” within a few years when world demand comes back online.

“The dominant market view remains that sub-$70 short run prices are a stop on what might be a circuitous route back above $90, not a wind-swept motel on the route to even lower prices,” Barclays said.

Source: OPEC Cuts Output by 1.5 Million Bpd as Oil Prices Slump

As I said on Friday, Congress just passed a US$57 billion alternative energy plan – that promises to do little but make the headlines.

Meanwhile, in another chamber of Congress, executives of big-oil firms were called on the carpet to account for recent sky-rocketing crude oil prices.

Congress wants to know why crude oil is soaring past US$135 a barrel – double the price of last year! Hmm… more demand than supply maybe?

Of course Congress just doesn’t get it! As the CEO of ConocoPhillips correctly points out, “The fundamental laws of supply and demand are at work.” We are getting squeezed by oil exporting nations that are “managing demand for their own interest,” and severely restricted access to energy reserves both at home and abroad.

Today, the International Energy Agency said that a major supply crunch is looming unless the world’s oil majors can ratchet up production by 12.5 million barrels a day within the next seven years. Uh… don’t count on it.

Decades of underinvestment in new energy exploration and development, and a seismic shift in who controls access to new energy deposits means sustainable high prices for years to come. Fossil fuels are a dead-end for American big-oil firms – it’s time to embrace an alternative energy future!

MIKE BURNICK, Senior Editor & Global Markets Analyst

Source: Congress Doesn’t Understand $135 Oil