You see, the massive fiscal stimuli and ultra-easy money from the Fed does indeed have real effects on the economy.  Whether you want to call them artificial or real, the stimuli have moved and will continue to move profits, until it is withdrawn.  And the timing of the deployment of the fiscal and monetary stimuli, the timing of its positive effects and the timing of its eventual removal are uncertain.

In addition, we have many short-term uncertainties. The upcoming Group of 20 (G20) meeting has potentially important ramifications for the global financial system and for global currencies. We also will get more data about foreclosures, existing and new home sales and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.’s (FDIC) funding needs.  Finally, we have Damocles’ sword hanging over the market with the potential for additional deficit from President Obama’s healthcare reform.

So we are going to go for a safe play that enjoys a nice dividend and presents a compelling value proposition right now: Kimberly Clark Corp. (NYSE: KMB).

When in doubt, go for consumer staples.  And a superbly run Kimberly Clark will do the trick.  The stock has overcorrected recently, and the headwinds of soft consumer demand and volatile commodity costs are abating.  What’s more is that KMB’s major source of growth will continue to be emerging economies.

U.S. consumer activity is not as dead as it looks.  While unemployment is still climbing, the rate at which people are losing jobs is declining on a consistent basis.  Additionally, the pick-up in home sales and in the stock market is helping slowly reverse the negative wealth effect suffered from last year’s crash.  Programs like “Cash for Clunkers” and tax incentives for purchases of new homes are having a positive effect on those sectors and are generating increased incomes in the industries that benefit from them.

With respect to emerging markets, the situation is even more positive. Advanced economies are surely going to commit their support to emerging market growth at the G20 meeting in Pittsburgh this week.

This is good for KMB, because supportive trade and capital flows will help propel the main source of KMB’s growth.   Emerging markets have been giving KMB more than three times the growth than advanced economies have.  And the trend will continue.

It is easy to understand why.  For starters, it helps a lot to have much higher population growth.  Also, income growth is higher as the currencies appreciate, and people leave poverty to join the middle class at a much higher rate than in the advanced economies.

The expected rate of growth for next year in emerging markets will continue to accelerate and dwarf the rate of growth of the United States, Europe and Japan for years to come.

Growth rates in emerging economies are catching its self-sustaining levels, which should lead to further acceleration next year.  This has been my thesis since last October, when I called the turn on Brazil with my recommendation of the iShares MSCI Brazil Index (NYSE: EWZ), which has since doubled in value.

Then we have the issue of volatile commodity prices, which have led KMB to raise prices, hurting some demand.  KMB is taking further restructuring measures to address costs in short order.  This will improve profitability short term, and it will give the company a lasting competitive advantage.

What is critical for KMB’s success is their established brand leadership.  The company’s brand enjoys superior recognition and acceptance and creates sustainable competitive advantage in an industry that is little affected by economic mishaps.  This cements the defensive nature of our call.

Meanwhile, KMB’s price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio on estimated earnings is only about 11 times.  That makes the stock a gift for investors that could easily pay about 15 times for a name like this.  Adding to the allure of the value proposition is KMB’s generous dividend yield of more than 4%.  This dividend is supported by a mammoth cashflow that ensures that it is safe.  In fact, the dividend payout ratio is only 60%.

Rather than investing in U.S. Treasuries, why not own a stock of a company that will surely appreciate strongly over several years?

And there is yet another reason to buy KMB.  There is short interest that in this market is likely to get squeezed out of their positions.  By many measures, KMB is an attractive short-squeeze play.  Shorts typically increase their positions in defensive stocks in bullish markets in order to go long against highly cyclical stocks.  Now, close to year end, as we are right now, it is highly probable that they will be reversing their position in order to close their books for the year.

And for those lovers of technical analysis, this stock is a gem:

• Its 50-day exponential moving average crossed to the upside violently in mid-July and has been consolidating at these levels.
• The stock is sitting at the precise lower-end of the Bollinger bands.
• And, very importantly, it is way oversold by many key indicators.

So, this is a defensive stock that pays a generous 4.2% dividend yield, and enjoys an earnings surprise upside as it deals with headwinds.

Recommendation: Buy Kimberly Clark Corp. (NYSE: KMB) at market(**). I suggest you buy anywhere between one third to half of your position initially, and dollar cost average into a full position over the next four weeks.

(**) – Special Note of Disclosure: Horacio Marquez holds no interest in Kimberly Clark Corp.

Source: Kimberly Clark Corp. Offers a Strong Defensive Position and a Generous Dividend Yield

Brazil had clearly become the new “must-play” market for investors.

And then they had to go and spoil it all.

As promising a market as Brazil had become, it was the discovery of the massive Tupi oil field off of the country’s east coast – that really transformed Brazil into an investor’s dream. The oil and natural-gas reserves are located beneath heavy salt beds in deep offshore water. These reserves are 23,000 feet to 26,000 feet down, a depth that wasn’t even accessible until recently.

These Tupi reserves appear to contain at least 60 billion barrels of oil, worth $4 trillion at today’s prices. Tupi oil is expected to start hitting the market in 2011 or 2012. When that happens, it will revolutionize Brazil’s economy and its shift its balance of payments.

The exploration of the Tupi oil fields had been carried out by the Brazilian oil company Petroleo Brasileiro SA (NYSE ADR: PBR) – more commonly referred to as Petrobras – in partnership with some of the international majors. The contracts call for the Brazilian government to receive royalties on any oil found.

Brazil is now one of only three top oil-producing countries to not assert state ownership of its oil reserves. Canada and the United States are the others.

This was very reassuring for the international oil majors. They’re used to dealing with fruitcake kleptocratic regimes in Venezuela, Angola, Nigeria and most of the Middle East. As a result, the Tupi deposits generated real excitement both among oil companies and among international investors in general. The feeling was that Brazil was about to end its two centuries of failed economic hopes. Fueled by oil revenue and additional economic activity, Brazil appeared ready to claim its true destiny as a wealthy country.

Unfortunately, it wasn’t to be.

Although there are several reasons for this, a key culprit is the election scheduled for next year. Incumbent Brazilian President Luis Inacio “Lula” da Silva can’t run again. But he’d very much like to choose his successor. The most likely candidate: current Chief of Staff Dilma Rousseff.

Rousseff was put in charge of devising a scheme to capture more of the Tupi oil revenues for the Brazilian government and, nominally, the Brazilian people. Tales were spun of how the new revenue would finally eliminate Brazilian inequality, and bring its poorest citizens up to Western living standards.

The new system announced this month reflects this aspiration. A new state oil company, Petrosal, would be created to manage the reserves. Petrobras – aided by outside investor capital – would carry out production. And Petrosal and the outside investors would share the output.

This plan will imbue Petrosal with a lot of power. The company would control half the votes on the operating consortium. And it would have veto rights over production and capital expenditures.

The revenue would be managed by a new state fund. The fund would devote this new cash to poverty relief, education and infrastructure.

In the meantime, the existing royalty system would remain in place. Under this system, outside investors would pay both royalties and a production share. In one acknowledgement of marketplace realities, concessions already granted would not be torn up.

There are two major problems with this system. First, it makes life much more difficult and less profitable for oil companies wanting to invest in the Tupi oil field. Had Brazil torn up existing contracts, I believe the oil majors would have left. In the past two years, the world’s Big Oil firms already saw existing agreements torn up in Nigeria and Venezuela. There’s just no point investing large amounts of money under such risky conditions.

As it is, the new Brazil agreement applies only to new contracts. So I believe the oil companies will probably put up with this new system – at least as long as oil prices remain high. It’s not as if these firms have a lot of alternatives right now.

However, given how expensive it will be to extract this oil, if market prices drop, it may end up being difficult to attract Big Oil players.

The more dangerous problem is this fund, which is little more than a huge pool of money that politicians can play with.

As I mentioned, Brazil’s economy has been one of the world’s best performers. This year, in the face of a worldwide recession, Brazil’s gross domestic product (GDP) is expected to decline only 1%, according to the forecasting panel of The Economist magazine.

Inflation is 5% and the budget deficit is only 2.8% of GDP – both excellent figures in this difficult year. Brazil’s monetary policy is an example to the world, with short-term interest rates still at 8.65%, well above the inflation rate.

But this money pool plan puts that performance at risk.

Brazilian public spending is already 35% of GDP, very high for such a poor country. State bureaucrats have feather-bedded contracts guaranteed to them under the 1988 constitution. So this “slush fund” will just fuel Brazilian corruption, diverting still more of that country’s economy into the pockets of politicians, their friends and favoured interest groups.

It’s no use for Brazilian spin-doctors to point out that Norway and Alaska have funds of this nature. Norway and Alaska have small populations and relatively un-corrupt political cultures. This fund must inevitably represent at least 3%-5% of Brazilian GDP. And it will be mostly wasted, spent without the market having any say as to its use or destination.

I’ve been watching Brazil for more than 30 years; since I began travelling there for the merchant bank Hill Samuel [now part of Lloyd's Banking Group PLC (NYSE ADR: LYG)] in the late 1970s. It’s a maddening country: Just when you think the Brazilian authorities have finally got their act together, and that the country is ready to achieve the enormous economic growth predicted for it since at least 1900, something unexpected and foolish goes wrong.

This appears to have happened again. And that’s a real pity – for Brazil’s citizens, and for global investors.

Source: The World’s Most Exciting Market – Until They Spoiled it

But given the economy’s strong performance following the financial meltdown that crushed economies the world over, it looks like Brazil’s time is now.

Brazil’s gross domestic product (GDP) contracted 0.8% year-over-year in the first quarter and 0.8% from the fourth quarter. That beat analysts’ expectations but wasn’t enough to keep the country from sliding into its first recession since 2003. However, the economy is already showing signs of recovery and many economists believe Brazil is already on the rebound and poised for a strong second half.

Brazil’s GDP likely grew 2.2% in the second quarter compared with the previous quarter, according to a report by Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC).

Nelson Barbosa, Brazil’s economic policies minister, optimistically told the Rio de Janeiro-based O Globo newspaper that Brazil’s economy will grow by 4-5% this year.

That kind of optimism in July helped Brazil’s benchmark Bovespa stock index book its best monthly gain since 1998.  The index jumped 2.3% to 55,997.81 – its highest level in 11 months. It’s up about 50% this year, outpacing even the red-hot MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 Index are up just 5.8% and 11% respectively.

Analysts that were skeptical of Brazil’s economic growth in the heady years leading up to the financial crisis pointed to the country’s supposed reliance on high commodities prices and exports.

No doubt, the country benefited a great deal from the commodities boom that drove up prices for Brazilian exports like iron ore, steel, and soybeans. But in eviscerating commodities prices and ravaging the market for exports, the financial crisis demonstrated that Brazil is more than a one-trick pony.

Sublime political stewardship leading up to and during the crisis kept Brazil’s economy well intact when global economy seemed to be falling apart. Stringent financial regulation shielded Brazil from the worst of the financial crisis, while government tax cuts and a growing middle class buoyed the country’s economy as exports dried up.

Back to the Future: Brazil’s Troubled Past Preserves its Present

Indeed, the very financial crises that had Brazilians believing their country would never find its place among the world’s elite economies endowed the nation’s policymakers with a streak of caution as they entered the 21st century.

“We are used to dealing with challenging environments, for our institutions and our regulations,” Alexandre Tombini, director for regulation at Brazil’s central bank, told the Financial Times. “Everything we have done since the mid-1990s has tended to take a more cautious approach.”

For instance, banks in Brazil are required to keep capital reserves that equate to at least 11% of their total assets. That’s high by most international standards, but many banks maintain capital ratios of 16% or more.

Banks are also required to keep 30% of all deposits at the central bank. That makes borrowing more expensive, but it also made it possible for Brazil’s central bank to dole out $51.4 billion (100 billion reals) overnight to ensure banks were adequately funded.

Brazil’s high interest rates are another reminder of the hyperinflation that overwhelmed the economy in the 1990s. But those rates also kept lenders from getting carried away, and now that the crisis has subsided, inflation has been crushed and rates are plunging.

Brazil’s official IPCA consumer price index advanced 0.24% in July after posting a 0.36% gain in June, according to the Brazilian Census Bureau (IBGE). The rolling 12-month rate sank to 4.5%, down from 4.8% in the 12 months through June.

Brazil’s central bank has lowered its primary interest rate, the Selic-base rate, six times this year, with the most recent a 0.5% cut after the bank’s July 21-22 meeting. The benchmark rate currently stands at a record low of 8.75%.

With inflation subdued, most analysts believe the rate will be kept at its historically low level until at least 2010.

“With inflation under control, I believe it will permit the Selic to be maintained at this low level until at least the middle of 2010.”Alex Agostini, chief economist at local ratings agency Austin, told The Wall Street Journal. “I don’t seen any inflationary pressures on the radar. The inflation scenario is so well behaved that it could give the central bank room to make another rate cut at the next meeting, even though the signals coming from the central bank have indicated there will be a pause.”

And while U.S. regulators are only now looking into the inconsistencies and manipulations wrought by irresponsible futures trading, Brazil has long held the reins tight on such activity. Short selling – selling shares you do not own – is allowed, but naked short selling – selling shares that you don’t have – is kept under wraps by fines for traders who can’t to deliver shares they have sold within three days.

Additionally, brokers in Brazil are obligated to provide information by every client. That means a Ponzi scheme like the one orchestrated by Bernie Madoff would never have worked in Brazil.

Retail Remains Resilient

Just as Brazil’s regulators have taken their cues from past mistakes, Brazil’s growing middle class – which now encompasses more than half the country’s population – has been hardened by tough times and proven resilient throughout the current crisis.

May retail sales advanced at an annual pace of 4% and June sales are expected to have increased by 6.5% year-over-year. Furthermore, an IBGE survey showed that nine out of 10 retail sectors showed month-on-month sales increases.

“Brazil has had so many crises over the years, people got used to them,” David Neeleman, the founder of JetBlue (Nasdaq: JBLU), who last December started a low-cost Brazilian airline called Azul told BusinessWeek. “I don’t think they’re at all fazed by this crisis-everyone seems to be focused on buying their first car, getting their first credit card.”

Credit card purchases have grown by 22% a year over the past decade, BusinessWeek reported.

However, Brazilian consumers also got a helping hand from the government, which cut income taxes and reduced levies on a wide range of durable goods.

In April, the government cut taxes on construction materials, cars, and household appliances. The end result was a 5.7% rise in spending on construction materials in May and an 8% surge in auto sales.  Rejuvenated auto sales hit a record-high 300,000 in June.

And increased sales led to increased production. Industrial output rose for the six straight month in June, climbing 0.2% on a monthly basis.

“Brazil has proved it can govern itself and keep the economy on track in very difficult times,” Riordan Roett, a professor at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies, told BusinessWeek.

Buying Into Brazil

Brazil has also proven that it has a strong consumer base of its own ready and able to fuel economic growth, even as exports falter. In fact, exports account for a mere 12% of Brazil’s $1.5 trillion economy.

From 2001 to 2007, the poorest 10% of the population enjoyed a 49% increase in real income, Brazilian economist Marcelo Neri told the Miami Herald, describing what he called “Chinese-like growth.”

Roughly 27.8 million Brazilians – out of a population of nearly 200 million – joined the consumer economy from October 2003 to October 2008, according to Neri.

About  8 million jobs have been created in that time, while the minimum wage has increased 45%

That makes Brazil a very attractive destination for investment.

In an April Buy/Sell/Hold column, Money Morning contributing editor and emerging markets specialist, Horacio Marquez, recommended Petroleo Brasileiro (NYSE ADR: PBR) for several reasons – the rising prices of oil in the next few years, the discoveries of large oil fields off Brazil’s shore, and increase local demand from the country’s growing population and income levels.

Another commodity play is Vale S.A. (NYSE ADR: VALE), the world’s largest iron ore exporter and a key supplier to China’s exuberant infrastructure expansion. Vale will benefit not only from increase in demand when global economies (and trade with them) recover, but also the rebound of commodity prices across the board.

Martin Hutchinson, another Money Morning contributor, recommends Companhia de Saneamento Basico, orSabesp (ADR: SBS), which operates the water-and-sewage system for Brazil’s Sao Paulo region. Sabesp currently has a P/E ratio of 6.92.

“Now that’s a growth business, and one that’s not dependent on commodity prices,” he said.

Finally, the iShares MSCI Brazil Index ETF (NYSE: EWZ) has been recommended by both Marquez and Hutchinson. The ETF aims to measure the performance of the Brazilian equity market. It has net assets of $8.58 billion, a Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio of 12.75, and a dividend yield of 3.66%.

Source: With One of the Hottest Economies on the Planet Brazil is Finally Living Up to Its Promise

Much of Brazil’s South Atlantic development will require drilling wells in waters up to two miles deep, through four-five miles of rock beneath the seabed. The prize at the end will be oil deposits with reserves estimated in the tens of billions of barrels. With access to this offshore bounty, Brazil expects to take its place among the first ranks of energy-producing nations in the world.

Brazil’s state-controlled national oil company (NOC), Petroleo Brasileiro SA (NYSE:PBR) plans to spend over $175 billion in the next five years just on offshore development. The immense investment involves buying and building dozens of new drill ships and seagoing platforms, along with many dozens more support and servicing vessels. Petrobras will lay thousands of miles of pipelines on the seafloor, connecting massive complexes of subsea equipment that will sit atop hundreds of oil wells.

To finance much of this development, Brazil has turned to China. With the active support of the Chinese government, many Chinese banks are lining up to extend loans to Brazil’s energy sector. Right now, there is an agreement for a Chinese consortium to lend Petrobras $10 billion. In exchange, Petrobras will eventually ship 200,000 barrels of oil per day to Chinese refineries. There are more such long-term finance supply deals in the works.

The Chinese government has established strategic guidelines for its national firms. That is, the Chinese government has set goals for Chinese firms to supply China’s long-term needs for energy and other natural resources. The Chinese are looking well ahead into the rest of this century, and even into the 22nd century. They want to ensure their future access to a diverse global supply chain, as well as win entrée into resource-rich regions of the world for Chinese industries and support firms.

Why are the Chinese receiving such a warm welcome in Brazil? According to Sergio Gabrielli, CEO of Petrobras, “The U.S. has a problem. There isn’t someone in the U.S. government that we can sit down with and have the kinds of discussions we’re having with the Chinese.”

In other words, there is a new geopolitics of oil at work. In the olden days, it would have been large international oil companies (IOCs) like Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM), Shell (NYSE:RDS.A / RDS.B) and BP walking into a room to meet with the Brazilians. The IOCs were the only game in town. They controlled the financing and the technology for large developments.

But today, the biggest deals begin with a political understanding at the top, hammered out between the highest levels of the respective governments. This top-down political deal making cuts out the IOCs, except where they have technical expertise that can be hired on a contract basis.

In essence, we are witnessing the end of the post-World War II economic construct of the world’s financial system. That construct always had a Western bias. But the 2008 crash of the Western business and financial model has changed everything. It has left a barren worldwide financial landscape for large development projects. Most traditional Western financing is simply not available for large projects. And as French author Francois Rabelais (1494-1553) once noted, “Nature abhors a vacuum.”

Thus has the Western financial crisis handed well-capitalized, government-backed Chinese banks and industrial firms an unmatched competitive advantage. With the traditional credit markets dry, Chinese banks have transformed into key lenders for the resource developments that will fuel the next generation of humanity. Indeed, for now, the Chinese are the world’s ONLY lenders for large resource development projects. See Brazil, Exhibit 1.

China’s Rare Earths Monopoly – All But Insurmountable

China’s support for Brazilian energy development is not the only angle that the Chinese government is pursuing for its future gain. China’s large reserves of foreign exchange, as well as its national strategic focus, has enabled incomparable – even insurmountable – progress for the Middle Kingdom to corner the world supply of substances called rare earths. Here’s the production chart for the past half century. Obviously, something is going on here.

Now that we’ve seen this chart, the questions arise: What are rare earths? And why are they important?

Rare earths are the 15 elements within the lanthanide series of the periodic table, plus the elements yttrium and scandium. The best known are lanthanum, cerium, neodymium, praseodymium, gadolinium, europium and samarium.

Here’s why rare earths are important. They’re used in a wide range of industrial and electronic applications. For many years, large amounts of lanthanum and cerium have been used in petroleum refining, with the result of increasing yields from each barrel of oil by about 10% while extending the life of other expensive catalysts like platinum. And rare earths find their way into myriad other applications, from aerospace super-alloys to rechargeable cell phone batteries.

More recently, large volumes of rare earths (especially neodymium) have gone into magnets. In fact, rare earths are a key component in strong, permanent magnets. It’s not those cute little refrigerator magnets; your computer contains a number of tiny magnets in its hard drive. If there are no permanent magnets, there are no computers. Or DVDs or DVRs or iPods, etc. Say farewell to your wired way of life.

And then there are the giant 1-ton magnets used in large windmill assemblies. Each windmill magnet is about the size of a car engine and uses 560 pounds of neodymium. The implication is that if the U.S. wants to erect windmills to generate electricity, the nation is making a long-term commitment to buy and use unprecedented amounts of neodymium. And there are NO substitutes. For just this one “clean energy” application, large amounts of rare earths – and the ores and mines to produce them – are essential.

There are many other clean-energy applications for rare earths as well, particularly in the now forming electric car industry. Neodymium magnets are key components in electric motors and regenerative braking systems used in hybrid vehicles. Without these magnets, no electric cars will ever roll off an assembly line, let alone whiz down an American highway.

Another significant demand for rare earths will come from large rechargeable batteries for electric cars. Nickel-metal hydride (NiMH) rechargeable batteries, for example, contain cerium and lanthanum in a form called “mischmetal.” And right now, NiMH batteries are the battery of choice for many hybrid vehicles. Overall, a typical hybrid electric vehicle can use about 50 pounds of rare earths – between the rechargeable battery pack, the permanent magnet motor and regenerative braking system. (Plus other tiny magnets for the sound system, power windows, power seats, windshield wipers, etc.)

So clearly, demand for rare earths is set to skyrocket. Just clean energy applications will drive unheralded demand for metals of which most investors – let alone consumers – have never heard.

It’s also important to keep in mind that almost none of the rare earths used in large power systems (like windmills) or electric vehicles (such as with NiMH batteries) are currently being recycled. The long lifetimes of the magnets and batteries, coupled with the lack of recycling technologies and dedicated facilities, means that any increase in supply can only come from new mining.

Another factor is that there appears to be an official Chinese policy to slow down export of rare earths. Chinese exports have decreased by 8% or so each of the past three years. Chinese suppliers have placed foreign customers on allocation, at reduced quantities from years past. The Chinese explain that they have closed mines for environmental reasons. Yet the Chinese also promise adequate supplies of rare earths if foreign users will move their industrial facilities into China.

According to Yoichi Sato, head of the Rare Earths Department of Japan’s Mitsui Industries, China is displaying its long-term strategy toward these critical elements. Mr. Sato believes that China is playing a complex game with the world’s rare earth consumers.

First, China is restricting rare earths exports, to provide its own high-tech industries with the chance to flourish and gain a competitive edge over rivals in Asia, Europe and the U.S. And second, it will force many foreign firms to move their high-tech factories and research centers to China to circumvent quotas. China, to be sure, has a small army of highly capable scientists and engineers who focus on rare earths applications – over 15,000 Ph.D.-level individuals, by one count.

Mitsui’s Mr. Sato believes that China will use its existing monopoly status in rare earths production to crush any competition that emerges. While about 42% of worldwide rare earths resources are outside China, there are NO non-Chinese sites with any significant processing or refining capacity. In the game of rare earths, China holds almost all of the cards.

Mr. Sato has stated, “Many people are looking at establishing alternative refineries and sources outside China, but the investment is not necessarily a sound one because of the threat of price revenge by China. If new projects emerge, as they have recently in Malaysia and Australia, China could just drop its prices and force rivals out of business.”

And as if on cue, in April 2009, Chinese firms used their financial muscle to buy large stakes in potential foreign rivals in Malaysia and Australia.

I hope that you now understand the importance of rare earths to the 21st-century economy of the West, particularly to the energy future of the U.S. I’m following this situation very closely. There ARE some potential investment opportunities in rare earths, but only in very small, thinly capitalized firms.

Until we meet again,
Byron King

Source: Brazil’s National Commitment to Energy – Bankrolled by China

Exxon’s Azulao-1 well tapped a reservoir that reportedly contains as much as 8 billion barrels of recoverable oil, says Luiz Lemos, a partner at TozziniFreire Advogados, a Brazilian law firm that represents foreign energy companies.

“This is very huge,” Lemos told Bloomberg News.

So is the potential benefit for Brazil. If Lemos’ estimate is accurate, this new Azulao find will rival the nearby Tupi oil field as the largest discovery on this side of the planet since Mexico’s Cantarell field was discovered in 1976.

Lemos’ estimate is unconfirmed, but Exxon Mobil Chief Executive Officer Rex Tillerson described the find in January as “a huge potential resource.”

Exxon first notified Brazilian regulatory agency National Petroleum Agency that it discovered hydrocarbons in the reservoir, identified as BM-S-22, on Jan. 16. The world’s largest oil company operates the block with a 40% stake. Hess Corp. (HES) also holds a 40% interest and Brazilian state energy company Petroleo Brasileiro SA (ADR: PBR), known as Petrobras, holds the remaining 20%.

It was Petrobras that first triggered the rush on Brazil’s energy sector when, in November 2007, the company announced the Tupi discovery – an underwater field that could contain as much as 80 billion barrels of oil equivalent.

Petrobas actually downplayed the findings of the Tupi oil field before announcing last November that the reserve contained between 5 billion and 8 billion barrels of light oil and gas.

Petrobras will begin extract its first crude oil from Tupi on May 1. Initial output from the Tupi field is expected to be around 15,000 barrels per day, then rising to 30,000 barrels a day during a later stage of testing, and eventually reaching about 100,000 barrels per day by 2010, Reuters reported.

If Tupi lives up to analysts’ expectations, it will be very encouraging not just for development of Azulao, but also the Carioca reserve, another massive field expected to hold a large bounty of petroleum.

Last year, Haroldo Lima, the head of Brazil’s National Petroleum Agency, said Carioca could hold 33 billion barrels of oil and gas. Upon hearing the news, brokers and analysts rushed to tell their clients that Brazil, as one minister put it just months ago, was about to become the “new Saudi Arabia.”

Experts say that even 10 billion recoverable barrels of oil – whether they come from Tupi, Carioca, Azulao, or a combination of all three – would be a remarkable find and enough to catapult Brazil into the world’s oil-producing elite. Brazil currently has about 12 billion barrels of proven reserves, and could soon find itself nestled between Nigeria (with 36 billion barrels) and Venezuela (80 billion).

Foreign Oil Majors Flock to Brazil

As rich and expansive as Brazil’s oil reserves may be, they are also very difficult to access. The Carioca field, for instance, is 170 miles offshore, more than 6,000 feet below the surface of the water, and trapped beneath a shelf of salt 500 miles long and 125 miles wide.

There is no question that extraction will be costly, but even at today’s energy prices there’s no shortage of domestic and foreign companies ready to invest big money Brazil’s energy sector.

In fact, Manuel Ferreira de Oliveira, chief executive officer of Portugal’s Galp Energia SGPS SA, said March 4 that production at the Tupi sub-salt oil field in Brazil is viable — despite the slide in international oil prices.

“Production at Tupi is competitive, even at the actual level of oil prices,” Oliveira told the Estado news agency, on the same day that his company released its fourth-quarter earnings. “The projects in Brazil are going to gain strength this year and the next.”

Exxon said Thursday that it would continue investing in exploration and production at “record levels,” despite the economic downturn and plunging oil and gas prices that have reduced spending by some competitors.

Exxon will invest $29 billion this year, and reiterated plans to invest between $25 billion and $30 billion annually over the next five years.

The company is currently spending $79 million a day to search for oil fields, construct platforms and renovate refineries Bloomberg reported.

China is also looking to become a long-term partner in Brazil. China Development Bank last month agreed to lend Petrobras $10 billion to help finance deepwater oil exploration off the coast of Brazil.
Oil exploration will be carried out with the participation of Sinopec (ADR: SHI), the Chinese state oil company.

The contract will be finalized within the next two months so it can be signed when Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva visits China in May, according to Petrobras Chief Executive Officer Sergio Gabrielli.

In addition to the exploration partnership, the deal signed between Petrobras and Sinopec includes the supply of 60,000 to 100,000 barrels of oil per day in the current year. Petrobras also signed a memorandum of understanding with state company China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) for the supply of 40,000 to 60,000 barrels per day.

Last month, Petrobras announced plans to invest $174.4 billion in exploration and production.

Energy demand in Brazil is “already starting to recover,” Petrobras CEO Gabrielli told Reuters during an interview at a Brazilian investment conference. “Even the fall in demand during the last quarter of 2008 was within a range we could expect for that season.”

In addition to Exxon and Petrobras, the companies that stand to profit the most from Brazil’s energy renaissance are offshore drilling companies such as Transocean Ltd. (RIG) and Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc. (DO), which was recently recommended by Contributing Editor Horacio Marquez in his weekly “Buy, Sell or Hold” feature.

Devon Energy Corp. (DVN) also made headlines last week when it notified regulators that it found traces of natural gas in the Barreirinhas Basin. Larry Nichols, chief executive officer of Devon Energy, said Monday that prices for natural gas are close to recovering from their recent drubbing.

“When the recession ends and the economy starts booming, we’re going to have less natural gas than we do today and prices are going to spike back up,” Nichols said.

Source: Is Brazil the ‘New Saudi Arabia?’

With the global commodities meltdown, and the news earlier this month of the government’s $152 stimulus package, the word on the street is that Brazil is facing tough times like everyone else these days.

That certainly may be true about most opportunities in Brazil, but one company continues to prosper – making it perhaps one of the great values on both the NYSE and the Brazilian Bovespa exchanges.

The company is Companhia Brasil Ads (NYSE:CBD), and it’s one of the largest grocery chains in the country. CBD manages to capture the synergy of Brazil’s enormous population and agricultural sectors to show a steady stream of positive earnings. Right now, the stock is trading near the bottom of it 52-week range of R$21.26 – 50.50.

CBD is riding a trend of ballooning grocery sales. Brazilian supermarket sales increased in December by 6.1% over December 2007, according to the Brazilian Supermarkets Association.

In 2008, CBD’s French parent, Casino, announced in 2008 expansion plans for the chain. It intends to invest around US$523 million opening 105 new outlets. The breakdown would be 80 convenience stores, 14 cash-and-carry stores, seven supermarkets, three discount stores and one hypermarket.

Market analyst Research and Markets was of the opinion that the supermarket sector could become saturated with major competitors from the U.S. and Europe, the convenience segment was “left open to target high-income shoppers.”

Regardless, CBD seems to be doing things right in terms of market expansion and protecting its home turf.

Sales in 2008 rose 9.0% compared with the year before with the strongest growth seen in the first half of the year.

In its Q3 report issued on Nov. 4, 2008, the company posted gross sales of R$ 5,055.6 million and a net of R$ 4,407.0, with respective year-over-year gains of 22.4% and 26.0%. Same-store gross sales rose by 10.3% and net sales by 13.6% over the same period the year before. And the company posted a Q3 net income of R$ 82.5 million, up a blistering 137.8% over Q3 2007.

Overall, CBD could be one of the best bargains for investors looking for a position in Brazil.

The idea of decoupling gained prominence in 2006, and achieved superstar status in early 2008, as emerging markets boomed. Advocates of decoupling professed that the rising prices of commodities, which overnight turned many third-world countries into boomtowns, let these long-neglected economies decouple from the G8 and other industrialized nations. By decoupling, they could finally set their own economic destiny.

Well, if there is any economic theory headed for the trash heap it’s decoupling. That’s because, as the markets have proven, young economies are largely dependent on more mature industrialized economies for their financial survival.

Cash, credit and construction fed the so-called Commodity Supercycle, which pushed emerging markets to all-time highs over the past few years. Now that cash, credit and construction are gone, investment opportunities in emerging markets look bleak for 2009.

For example, the Financial Times reported yesterday record volumes of government bonds from the industrialized nations could crowd out emerging markets from a shrinking pool of credit.

Some $3 trillion in government bonds expected to be issued by the big developed economies in 2009 – three times more than in 2008, the FT wrote.

The timing couldn’t be worse for emerging markets. Not only do they need to repay record debts, but they are also dependent on credit to fund new capital-intensive ventures in mining, exploration and drilling so they can be responsive to an eventual turnaround in global markets.

This creates an environment for a new rash of sovereign defaults – turning back the clock by decades on countries in Latin America, Eastern Europe and Asia.

For investors, emerging markets could be a roller coaster ride at best.

As decoupling proves to be a false idol, emerging markets have clearly proven how closely tied they are to the U.S. and Europe.

With that in mind, the International Monetary Fund issued a forecast last week that said U.S. economic growth will be close to zero for the rest of 2008 and the few months following.

The IMF expects a gradual recovery in the U.S. starting in Q2 2009 – an outlook shared by most advanced economies.

Bottom line for emerging markets is that they will continue to be crippled by the global financial contagion at least through the first half of next year.

This from Money Morning:

Between September 2007 and June 2008, oil prices doubled, gold rose 30% and commodities, in general, advanced by a similar percentage.

So why, six months later, when prices have fallen back below last year’s levels, does everybody think they won’t rise again? The difficulties of extraction haven’t gone away, nor have the prospects of increasing consumption in the faster-growing emerging markets such as China. Yes, the prices of commodities are severely affected by marginal moves in supply and demand, but this is ridiculous!

Rest assured, commodities prices will rebound in the New Year. The reasons will soon become quite clear.

The decline in commodities prices since the summer is broad-based. The Reuters Continuous Commodities Index traded recently at 341, down 25% from a year earlier and off about 45% from its June high. At $48 a barrel, oil is trading at less than one-third of its June high. And gold, which appreciated less than other commodities in the spring, is still down 18% from the $1,000-per-ounce level it reached earlier this year.

Conventional wisdom blames the decline in commodity prices squarely on the global recession. Since the rise in demand from emerging markets – particularly the huge consumption bases of China and India – had caused the previous run-up, it seems natural that the absence of that demand growth would cause prices to decline. After all, that happened in 1982, when a deep recession in the United States spread to a number of other countries. Oil prices plunged from $40 a barrel to a mere $10, breaking the back of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) in the process.

This time around, however, the math doesn’t seem to work. For one thing, the world as a whole is by no means locked into recession. We in the rich countries think of our economies as spiraling into a deep decline, but the reality is that we may only be witnessing a secular shift caused by the narrowing of income differentials between rich and poor countries as globalization proceeds.

In countries such as China, India and Brazil – three of the four so-called “BRIC” economies – growth has slowed and many are suffering imbalances in their financial structures, but there is little sign of actual decline in any of them. Indeed, if China’s recently announced $590 billion infrastructure investment serves to redirect growth toward domestic consumers, it is possible that the demand for oil and other commodities there may show very little dip at all; it takes a great deal of iron ore and other commodities to produce $100 billion worth of railroads, for example, one of China’s stated objectives.

On the supply side, OPEC was full of spare capacity in the 1980s. South Africa and the Soviet Union were still expanding gold production, and the explorations of the 1970s had produced surpluses of many other commodities. But in the past two and a half decades, things have changed.

Oil, for example, remains in short supply. Both deep offshore fields – like those discovered by Petroleo Brasileiro SA, or Petrobras (ADR: PBR), in the Tupi Complex – and the tar sands (like the ones in Canada and Venezuela), are economically unfeasible with oil trading at such a low price. And, if prices remain low, the expansion and exploration of new sources of production will be curtailed even further.

More importantly, though, supply and demand is only one of the reasons commodity prices rise and fall. What really spurred the big price rise in commodities that took place earlier this year was the explosion in the money supply throughout the world.

Money supply, unlike demand, is something that hasn’t evaporated with the economic downturn. In fact, it has actually ramped up. Even though money markets have become illiquid, central banks throughout the world are forcing down interest rates and pumping out liquidity by every means they can think of [Indeed, the policymaking arm of the U.S. Federal Reserve meets today (Tuesday), and is expected to cut rates yet again. For a related story, click here].

Meanwhile, governments everywhere (except Germany) are implementing massive “stimulus packages” that will destabilize budgets and insert huge additional demand into the global economy. Since the governments will have to borrow the money to finance those stimulus packages – and the budget deficits that are inevitable in an economic downturn – central banks will be compelled to pump out even more money to accommodate all the increased debt; otherwise, interest rates would go through the roof and finance for the private sector would become unobtainable, hardly the object of this whole costly exercise.

The future is thus one of rapidly increasing inflation, combined with a healthy recovery in global demand, at least in the emerging markets, as Europe and the United States may suffer deep recessions this time around.

To take advantage of this likely trend, I would recommend a broad portfolio of shares whose prices are closely linked to the prices of major commodities. Among those you might consider:

• Vale (ADR:RIO): As a gigantic Brazilian iron ore producer, Vale will benefit enormously from China’s new infrastructure program (Think of all those steel rails!). The stock is currently trading at just over $12 a share with a Price/Earnings ratio (P/E) of about 7.0 and a yield of slightly more than 1.0%.

• Rio Tinto PLC (ADR:RTP): Another huge mining conglomerate, the long-and-bloody attempted takeover of Rio Tinto by BHP-Billiton Ltd. (ADR: BHP) recently fell apart. At $93, Rio Tinto shares have a yield of 5.8% and a prospective P/E of about 3.0. The company is overleveraged, so somewhat dangerous, but you’d be getting paid for the risk.

• Suncor Energy Inc. (NYSE:SU): The largest pure player in the Canada’s Athabasca tar sands, Suncor’s marginal cost of production from operating facilities is about $30 per barrel and the cost of opening new facilities is about $60 per barrel. It’s currently trading with a P/E of 8.0 but has a yield of less than 1.0%, as it needs all its cash.

• SPDR Gold Trust (NYSE:GLD)exchange-traded fund (ETF): The largest ETF that invests in gold, GLD has more than 750 tons of the “yellow metal” held in trust.

Yanzhou Coal Mining Co. (ADR:YZC): China’s largest coal miner, Yanzhou has a P/E of 4.0, yields 3.5% and enjoys low costs – not to mention a super-close proximity to the gigantic market that is China.

Source: Five Ways to Profit from the New Year Rebound in Commodity Prices

This from Money Morning:

The second phase of emerging markets expansion is well on its way – a period of self-sustaining growth, driven by consumer growth and infrastructure spending.  And Latin America, following China and other Asian economies, is one of the key global pillars of growth that will save the global economy and the U.S. financial system from total collapse. But not all the countries in Latin America will go on to prosper.  There is a wide gulf in the policies that will continue to separate the winners from the losers.

Let me explain.

In a recent article in our affiliated monthly newsletterThe Money Map Report, Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald made three important points:

• The emerging markets (of which Latin America is the second-most-important leg) will play a growing role in the continued long-term growth of the world economy.
• The U.S. economy will continue to grow long-term, but its relative importance in the world economy will continue to decline.
• In the near term, the emerging markets could well play a determining role in keeping the overall global economy – and the U.S. financial system – from dropping into a depression-like funk that we won’t be free of for years. Emerging economies in Asia and parts of Latin America have huge cash reserves, much of which will be invested in infrastructure projects over the next 20 years.

In the next three years, China, alone will invest as much as $725 billion in infrastructure, while Brazil will invest $225 billion for the same purpose.
This is important to remember, given that the dramatic sell-off the emerging markets have experienced has many investors doubting the ability of these countries to “decouple” from the global economy.  The reality of the situation is that most investors and pundits are failing to differentiate between economic decoupling and market decoupling.

The Gloomy Present

While growth in emerging economies has dropped slightly, the prices of securities and currencies in emerging markets has fallen drastically.   Many investors think that the U.S. economic crash will lead to a dramatic drop in U.S. orders of emerging-market products, which will cause those economies to drop off. That, in turn, would squeeze the profits and market valuations of the companies that operate in these economies.

But that’s a mistaken assumption. And here’s why.

In Brazil, for instance, exports account for a mere 13% of gross domestic product (GDP). In China, exports are just 10% of GDP. So some contraction in U.S. and European orders can easily be counterbalanced by fiscal and monetary stimulus in these countries.

On Oct. 27, in the depths of a rabid, indiscriminate sell-off, I published an extremely bullish piece on Brazil. Since that article was published, Brazil went on to rally as much as 47%. As of Friday’s close – even after some subsequent profit-taking – the exchange traded fund (ETF) that represents the Brazilian market (NYSE:EWZ) is still up 21% (and has risen as much as 42% since my recommendation).

And most emerging markets economies have plenty of fiscal and monetary maneuvering room. Leading the pack is China, which accounted for some 27% of global growth last year, and which has continued to use both fiscal and monetary tools to keep itself on a solid growth path.

It recently slashed interest rates again, down to 6.66% (a lucky number in the Chinese culture, meaning “things (are) going smoothly”).  With record foreign reserves of $1.9 trillion, China also approved a “fast and heavy-handed” $586 billion stimulus, mainly in housing and infrastructure, to be implemented through 2010.  And the Chinese yuan will drop almost 7% vis-a-vis the U.S. dollar to cushion losses in trade.  It has also lowered taxes on investments in capital goods.  And in a key move that’s been almost totally overlooked by the media, China has made huge market-oriented reforms in agriculture.

China has just allowed its 780 million farmers to rent, transfer or utilize as collateral their rights to their lands and eliminated all taxes on agricultural production and to farmers.  This will allow for a massive increase in the scale of production by consolidating companies.  In this way, China will keep its 120 million hectares dedicated to agriculture exclusively, with no possibility of urbanization, while at the same time allowing the millions of small farmers to sell out, and get capital to move to the cities.  This will not only increase the productivity of Chinese farming dramatically by allowing for economies of scale to work and attracting billions in investments, it also will create a huge incentive for these millions of farmers to move to the cities, boosting housing and infrastructure demand.

Brazil’s plans are very similar to those of China. There’s a:

• Strong fiscal stimulus, allowing a drop in the value of the real currency (a decline that’s already been substantial) in order to cushion exports.
• An easing of capital requirements to Brazil’s strong banking system, which will incentivize housing and car loans.
• Export financing.
• And huge local infrastructure projects.

There is another little-understood phenomenon that cushions the blows for emerging economies: Intra-emerging market trade has become increasingly important.  By now everybody understands that iron ore from Brazil and coal and oil from other emerging markets is flowing into China in order to fuel China’s massive infrastructure buildup and growing consumer demand.

The Breakdown on Brazil

Increasingly, a growing proportion of the infrastructure needs of industrial goods being bought by emerging economies are goods produced by other emerging economies.  Trade between Latin America and China has increased by 13 times since 1995, from $8.4 billion to $100 billion.  And China, now the second-most-important commercial partner to the region after the United States, has finally been accepted as a member of the Inter-American Development Bank, committing itself to contribute $350 million to the bank. As an example of this growth in industrial trade, Argentina just bought 279 subway cars from China’s CITIC Group.

However, not all trade with China has been successful, due to China’s notable deficiencies in quality control, especially in health standards.  For example, Latin American imports of medicines manufactured in China had catastrophic results in Panama two years ago, where more than 100 people died and hundreds more became ill from medications containing toxic Chinese glycerine.  Recently, Panama detected toxic chemicals in imported Chinese sweets and crackers and Argentina’s customs recently seized Chinese 20,000 thermos containers for having elevated content of toxic chemicals.

And all of this means that there is a market disconnect between the prices of Brazilian shares and those elsewhere in Latin American equities and the fundamentals of the underlying companies, that we will see played out in the next and subsequent years.  Why?

Just because huge financial losses by banks precipitated a massive de-leveraging cycle, which means they had to sell their holdings, regardless of merit. And that included big sell-offs in preferred investments, including the hugely promising and profitable Petroleo Brasileiro SA (Petrobras) (ADR:PBR), Vale (ADR:RIO), and many others.

Sign up below… and we’ll send you a new investment report for free: “Credit Crisis Report.”

And what is worse, their sales hit the stop losses of major hedge funds, who were also leveraged in such favorite plays as commodities, steel, coal, agro, emerging markets and even defensive stocks such as the U.S.-based Pepsico Inc. (NYSE:PEP).

When you have the proprietary positions of banks and hedge funds all trying to get out of the same door at the same time because of risk management issues, you get the current disconnect between market fundamentals and pricing.

Another impact that we have to understand is that the ongoing dramatic interest rate drops in all major G7 economies and the more than $3 trillion in G7 fiscal programs will have a marked impact on growth next year, containing what would have been a much nastier economic contraction.  But while G7 countries will barely grow between negative 0.5% and a positive 1% in 2009, with the worst contraction front-loaded and recovering in the second half, emerging economies will grow at a minimum of 4%, and in the case of China maybe as high as 10%.

In my October Brazil analysis, I detailed the massive stress that Brazil came under in 1995 because of another exogenous shock: The Mexican devaluation, the so-called “Tequila effect,” which ricocheted around the world, and which caught Brazil in 1995 in a much weaker position than it is in today. Back then, Brazil had a much higher level of debt, much lower reserves, a fiscal sector that needed huge reform, and a much lower capacity for exports.  Brazil dealt with this massive stress effectively and went on to work at each one of its weaknesses in the next 13 years, getting itself into a position of strength today.

While having the temptation and the perfect excuse for a default right at hand, Brazil proved its seriousness back then by taking the hard, but certain road to progress, keeping its international commitments and gradually affecting strong structural reforms.  Since then, it has become a net creditor to the world; it controlled inflation, and avoided an overheating of its economy with tight fiscal and monetary policies during the recent run-up in commodity prices.

This is paying off strongly today.  The policies, run day to day by a sophisticated technocracy led by top economists and international bankers, many of which held top positions in leading international banks, has allowed Brazil to move forward and to anticipate GDP growth of 4% to 5% for the New Year.
Hence, Brazil is by far my favorite Latin American play for 2009.

Checking Out Chile

Following closely behind, and hindered only by its small size, is the poster child of fiscal and monetary prudence: Chile.

Chile, which came out of its 1970s default by eliminating its foreign debt and successfully restructuring its banking system, has made every effort to maintain very prudent fiscal and monetary policies and to diversify its exports away from copper, which, being the largest exporter of the metal in the world, still accounted for 38% of its GDP.

Today, Chile exports many diversified products, including agricultural products, wine, fertilizers and industrial wares.  And because it’s situated on the Pacific Coast, it is geographically well positioned to trade with the fastest-growing markets in the world – China and the other emerging Asian tigers.

But Chile, in order to minimize the cyclical nature of its economy due to the wide fluctuation in the price of copper, decided years ago to start a “rainy-day” fund, which would accumulate wealth in the good years and be used to soften the blow in the bad ones.  Now, Chile boasts a $28 billion sovereign wealth fund, accumulated almost completely from its copper profits.  That’s almost equal to a staggering 14% of the country’s GDP in cash savings!  This will enable Chile to implement counter-cyclical policies to keep growing at 3.5% to 4% next year – or about the current rate of growth, even with the worldwide meltdown.

Chile already has started to deploy this capital, having passed a $1.15 billion government plan on top of last month’s $850 million to stimulate housing and small-business lending, injecting that capital into a government bank that will make available loans for small businesses.

Avoid Argentina

Chile’s fiscal prudence is in direct contrast to Argentina’s lack of discipline.  Argentina’s Peronist government, which squandered the agricultural commodities bonanza in fiscal spending, is now is trying to use its majority in both houses in Congress to pass the nationalization of the privatized pension funds under the excuse of “protecting them from market volatility.”

These funds, which now have successfully grown to more than $30 billion in size, or 73% of the government’s budget and have returned an average of more than 13% a year since inception will allow the government to cover its fiscal gap and debt maturities next year and to financed public works and consumption projects.  The government, at the same time, is suffering from an important loss of confidence, as evidenced by its need to resort to police controls in order to prevent the illegal purchase of U.S. Dollars.  Argentina might end 2009 with growth of negative 2% and unemployment of 10%.  Stay away.

A “Maybe” for Mexico

Mexico, given its strong links to the United States, is receiving a heavy dose of external shocks on many economic and financial fronts – especially where the United States is concerned: It’s being hit by a drop in exports (the United States is the main component), the drop in oil prices, lower tourism (its largest proportion of travelers is from the United States), falling U.S. investments in Mexico, and reduced remittances from Mexicans working in the United States back to their Mexican relatives.

In addition, many companies suffered strong losses in their derivatives hedges, banks have had to reduce lending due to reduced liquidity and the Mexican peso has lost some 22% of its value against the U.S. dollar.  Mexico’s growth in the New Year may fall to about 1% from 2008’s 2.4% pace, and the country is on its way to approving the first budget with a fiscal deficit in four years.  The government’s target will be negative 1.8% of GDP, in order to stimulate the economy.  Mexico, seeing its oil production declining, is seen moving soon towards opening some oil areas for exploration and development, which some estimate could add another 1% to GDP.

Once the U.S. markets have stabilized, Mexico’s stocks will be an incredible buy once more, since they discount a very bad scenario at these prices.

A Case Against Colombia

Colombia, another country that has merited a lot of attention, given its staunch support of U.S. anti-drug and anti-money-laundering efforts, has seen its free trade agreement with the United States inexplicably delayed.

The country foresees a tightening of credit conditions, so it is moving up its peso-based borrowing to this year.  Next year it will issue only $1 billion in foreign bonds and tap $1.4 billion from multi-lateral lenders.  So the refinancing risk for Colombia is muted, given the small amounts involved, and the country’s economy should expand a minimum of 1% in the New Year, even in the worst economic scenario. However, Colombia could grow as much as 4% under a moderate scenario.

That would represent a big drop from the 8% growth recorded this year.

The story in Colombia has been the curbing of inflation, and how far behind the curve the central bank has been, at least as recently as July, when it boosted rates up to 10% and then kept them there.

These ultra-high interest rates, combined with the global slowdown, have blunted demand for consumer products in Colombia. Since the passage of the trade pact is a situation in flux, I want to wait and see right now.

I will not go into the economies of Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador, which, with massive intervention by their governments and advances against property rights, are experiencing severe economic and political stress, and which do not offer the guarantees needed for foreign investment.

Source: Some Latin American Markets Show Profit Potential in the New Year, While Others Pose Risk

[Editor's Note: This is the eighth installment of our “Outlook 2009” series, which looks at the global investing outlook for the New Year.]

If you haven’t got the means to invest in a European stocks, Americans can play this sweet deal with the local pink sheet offering – Barry Callebaut AG R (PINK:BYCBF).

More from Taipan Daily:

I just can’t take it any more.

I have been writing about this collapse in one column or another for years now. At first it was warnings about our profligate ways. Then it was the first few teasing leading indicators.

And for the last year? Nothing but nonstop guts and gore. An endless cadence of corporate losses… falling share prices… bank failures… closing stores… shrinking GDP… failing employment…

Quite frankly, it’s getting on my nerves.

Cold Comfort

Of course, the shorter days and colder weather don’t help much either. The only “top down” driving I can look forward to for the next few months will be on the tractor -clearing snow off a quarter mile of private road.

It’s time for a change of pace.

My wife has a cure for times like these. On a high shelf in the kitchen, far beyond the reach of our children’s sticky little fingers, she keeps a private stash. Too little sunlight, frightening times and too many bills can’t just beat down the buzz… of high-grade Swiss chocolate.

So today, I am going to steal a page out her book.

Time to Change Our Outlook

I am only going to mention “stagnating sales” once more. Because I have uncovered a business that has found a delightful way around the whole issue. In fact, even their product is pleasant. Even tasteful, as it were.

The folks who run the world’s largest bulk chocolate maker, Barry Callebaut AG (SWF:BARN), are also tired of Europe’s stagnating chocolate sales. But rather than wallow in a mawkish funk, they are looking to start up production somehow, someway in Brazil.

Seems that Latin America was the one market they had not thoroughly penetrated. And Brazilians in particular are devils for the stuff lately. Just as consumption in Europe is falling off, Brazilians are craving 15% more (at least as of 2007, anyway, which is the most up-to-date info available from the Brazilian Association of Cacao, Chocolates, Candies and Byproducts Industries).

The Old “Can-Do”

In times like these, you just have to love Barry Callebaut AG CEO Patrick De Maeseneire’s “can do” attitude. When grilled by a reporter from Bloomberg, he responded with perfect self-confidence: “This crisis will be more severe than any I’ve known, and it will take longer to recuperate, but knowing that, you have to prepare yourself for the end of the crisis.”

Now De Maeseneire is no Warren Buffett, mind you. He’s not an investing genius in charge of trillions of dollars worth of floundering U.S. shares. But he does mind his $2.7 billion chocolate empire rather well.

Recent deals with his fellow Swiss outfit, Nestlé SA, local hero Hershey Co. (NYSE:HSY), Unilever (NYSE:UL) and even Kellogg’s (NYSE:K) Keebler elves, have boosted the most recent 12 months’ (July 07 through August 08) profits 66% over the previous twelve months. And while even Barry Callebaut was not immune to the massive global downdraft, shares have been rising steadily since last October.

Sunny, Warm and Cheap

Looking back to Brazil, what attracts De Maeseneire is also what has attracted the attention of my fellow editors, Chris DeHaemer and Justice Litle: not only do they want more “stuff” – cars, houses, food, highways, air conditioners, plumbing, whatever – but it is (still) just so damned cheap to get into these markets.

Barry Callebaut plans to spend some 15 million Swiss francs (that’s $12 million American) to either form an alliance with someone local, acquire or just plain build a plant of their own.

Here in the States, you can’t even bribe a congressman for that – pardon me: “fund a congressperson’s campaign,” let alone break ground on a new factory. And even that presumes you could pry a banker’s cold fingers from around that much cash in the first place.

C’est la Vie

If you are interested in buying into this tale of chocolate-powered optimism, and don’t feel up to wiring Europe for the shares, you could always pick up their local pink sheet offering listed as Barry Callebaut AG R (BYCBF.PK).

As with all pink sheet listings, it behooves you to keep an eye on volume before buying, as too many interested parties on any given day could push the price too high.

I will allow Messr. De Maeseneire to close today’s column: “If everything stops, of course the world will stop. I go out with the assumption that the economy will come back.”

Source:  Wall Street Gore… or Swiss Chocolate? What Are You, Nuts?