<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; Jef</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/jef/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Will Last Week’s Rally Carry Over?</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/will-last-week%e2%80%99s-rally-carry-over/14984</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/will-last-week%e2%80%99s-rally-carry-over/14984#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bear market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jef]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Rally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RHHY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sgp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Indices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=14984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Is it a bull-market rally or a bear-market fake? It came right down to the wire, but the <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI" target="_blank">Dow  Jones Industrial Average</a></strong> ended the day Friday with its first <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/03/13/briefing-americas-closer-markets-equity-financial.html" target="_blank">four-day  rally</a> since November, ending the week with a gain of 9.0%. </p>
<p>And despite that robust performance, the Dow was the laggard among the three major U.S. stock indices. The tech-laden <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXNASDAQ:.IXIC" target="_blank">Nasdaq  Composite Index</a></strong> soared 10.6% while the broader <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP:.INX" target="_blank">Standard  &#38; Poor’s 500 Index</a></strong> edged it with a weekly gain of 10.7%.</p>
<p>Fuel for the rally came from several sources. Stocks had sold off sharply coming into last week. But then such beleaguered banks as <strong>Citigroup Inc. (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=c" target="_blank">C</a>)</strong>, <strong>Bank of America (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=bac" target="_blank">BAC</a>)</strong> and <strong>JP Morgan Chase &#38; Co. (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=jpm" target="_blank">JPM</a>) </strong>started to talk  somewhat bullish about earnings.</p>
<p>The rally&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it a bull-market rally or a bear-market fake? It came right down to the wire, but the <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI" target="_blank">Dow  Jones Industrial Average</a></strong> ended the day Friday with its first <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/03/13/briefing-americas-closer-markets-equity-financial.html" target="_blank">four-day  rally</a> since November, ending the week with a gain of 9.0%. <span id="more-14984"></span></p>
<p>And despite that robust performance, the Dow was the laggard among the three major U.S. stock indices. The tech-laden <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXNASDAQ:.IXIC" target="_blank">Nasdaq  Composite Index</a></strong> soared 10.6% while the broader <strong><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP:.INX" target="_blank">Standard  &amp; Poor’s 500 Index</a></strong> edged it with a weekly gain of 10.7%.</p>
<p>Fuel for the rally came from several sources. Stocks had sold off sharply coming into last week. But then such beleaguered banks as <strong>Citigroup Inc. (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=c" target="_blank">C</a>)</strong>, <strong>Bank of America (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=bac" target="_blank">BAC</a>)</strong> and <strong>JP Morgan Chase &amp; Co. (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=jpm" target="_blank">JPM</a>) </strong>started to talk  somewhat bullish about earnings.</p>
<p>The rally was a confluence of forces. There was a significant sell-off coming into this week, as well as a dearth of positive news, then Citigroup, Bank of America, and JPMorgan Chase started talking about earnings and Washington was supportive on a couple of levels.</p>
<p>Investors also were encouraged by comments made by National Economic Council Director Larry Summers, who in a rare public appearance contended consumer spending appeared to have stabilized, according to <strong><em><a href="http://tradethenews.com/" target="_blank">TradeTheNews.com</a>.</em></strong></p>
<p>But the question now becomes: Where do we go from here?</p>
<p>Art Hogan, chief market strategist at <strong>Jeffries &amp; Co. (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=Jeffries+Group" target="_blank">JEF</a>)</strong>, said that “what’s important is we haven’t retraced any of the week’s moves. Even if it’s a bear market rally, the good news is the duration.”</p>
<p>The stock market is a discounting mechanism, meaning it  prices assets according to what <em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">will</span></em> happen, as opposed to what <em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">is </span></em>happening  right now.</p>
<p>But whether this is a kind of “dead-cat” bounce &#8211; with more bloodletting to come &#8211; or is the start of a sustained rally that signals a turnabout in the U.S. economy &#8211; is just <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/03/12/bear-market-rally/" target="_blank">too early too  early to call</a>.</p>
<p>Some key things to watch this week:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>The       continued analysis of this <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/03/13/g20-meeting-2/" target="_blank">weekend’s G20       meeting</a> and subsequent recommendations.</li>
<li>U.S. Federal Reserve policymakers meet Wednesday; although they cannot cut interest rates any more, investors will watch to see what other moves the central bank could make and &#8211; just as importantly &#8211; what policymakers will have to say. Some analysts are speculating the central bank may choose to purchase long-term Treasury bonds or even additional <strong>Fannie Mae (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=fnm" target="_blank">FNM</a>)</strong> or <strong>Freddie Mac (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=fre" target="_blank">FRE</a>)</strong> debt.</li>
<li>Investors also will be getting insights into the economy’s health with reports on jobless claims, housing starts, industrial production and inflation at both the consumer and wholesale level.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Market Matters</h2>
<p><strong>Citigroup</strong> <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/03/10/citigroup-profit/" target="_blank">announced that  its first quarter would actually show positive earnings</a> and other  financials followed with similar projections. Citi Chief Executive <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/officerProfile?symbol=C.N&amp;officerId=951615" target="_blank">Vikram  S. Pandit</a> stated that the one-time megabank has been profitable for the  first two months of the year and <strong>JP  Morgan Chase’s</strong> top exec echoed the cheerleading on his own institution’s  behalf.  Not to be outdone, <strong>Bank of America’s</strong> <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/officerProfile?symbol=BAC.N&amp;officerId=73427" target="_blank">Kenneth  D. Lewis</a> claimed that his bank should not need any additional government  capital.</p>
<p><strong>Freddie Mac</strong> lost $24 billion last  quarter and needs another $30 billion in bailout funds; <strong>Merrill Lynch &amp; Co. Inc.</strong> stands accused by the New York  Attorney General of misleading Congress (and investors) about its bonuses.</p>
<p>Oil rose late in the week to close above $46 a barrel as traders speculated that the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries could limit production even more at its weekend meeting after an energy agency cut demand projections by another 200,000 barrels a day.  Investors welcomed news that Citi’s situation may not be quite as dire and continued buying on rumors that the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) may suspend mark-to-market rules.</p>
<p>Financials led  the rally and healthcare climbed as well on the merger news concerning deals  involving, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/03/09/merck-stokes-ma-fires/" target="_blank">first,</a> <strong>Merck &amp; Co. Inc. (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:MRK" target="_blank">MRK</a>) </strong>and<strong> Schering-Plough Corp. (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:SGP" target="_blank">SGP</a>)</strong>, and, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/03/13/genentech-roche/" target="_blank">second</a>, <strong>Roche Holding AG (ADR: <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=OTC:RHHBY" target="_blank">RHHBY</a>) </strong>and <strong>Genentech Inc. (<a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:DNA" target="_blank">DNA</a>).</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="464" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Market/ Index</strong></td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Year Close (2008)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Qtr Close (12/31/08)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous Week</strong><br />
<strong>(03/06/09)</strong></td>
<td width="74" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Current Week </strong><br />
<strong>(03/013/09)</strong></td>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Dow Jones Industrial</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,776.39</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">8,776.39</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">6,626.94<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="74" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">7,223.98</p>
</td>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-17.69%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">NASDAQ</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,577.03</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,577.03</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,293.85<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="74" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,431.50</p>
</td>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-9.23%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">903.25</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">903.25</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">683.38<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="74" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">756.55</p>
</td>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-16.24%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Russell 2000</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">499.45</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">499.45</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">351.05<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="74" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">393.09</p>
</td>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-21.30%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Funds</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">0.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="74" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0.25%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>0 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">10 yr Treasury (Yield)</td>
<td width="56" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.24%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.24%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.83%<strong></strong></p>
</td>
<td width="74" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.89%</p>
</td>
<td width="94" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>+65 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2>Economically Speaking</h2>
<p>On the heels of the upcoming G-20 meeting, U.S. President Barack Obama suggested a more coordinated stimulus effort to help revive the worldwide downturn. His remarks were not very well-received by some of his trading partners, who felt that Obama insinuated the Europeans weren’t doing enough to jumpstart their respective economies.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, China lashed out at  U.S. officials about the outlook for the domestic economy and, in particular,  U.S. Treasuries<strong> [For a related story in  today's issue of</strong> <strong><em><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links" onclick="return alinks_click(this);" title=""  style="padding-right: 13px; background: url(http://www.contrarianprofits.com/wp-content/plugins/alinks/images/external.png) center right no-repeat;" rel="external">Money Morning</a></em></strong>, <strong><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/03/16/china-stimulus-7/" target="_blank">please click here</a></strong>]. As America’s largest creditor nation, China remains concerned about its investments in U.S. securities in light of the mass spending on domestic issues.</p>
<p>While the economic calendar was relatively light, the actual numbers offered a tad bit of “promising” news. Retail sales dropped 0.1% in February, but actually climbed once auto activity (rather inactivity) was dropped from the equation. In fact, businesses as diverse as furniture, electronics, and attire all experienced sales increases last month. The revised January retail number depicted the best increase in level of activity in three years.</p>
<p>The U.S. trade deficit shrank for the sixth straight month in January and now stands at its lowest level since October 2002. Declining imports and exports revealed further contraction in the global demand for goods and services. The weaker labor market remained quite concerning as claims for unemployment benefits have set records in six of the past seven weekly releases.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar </strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="353" bordercolor="#000000">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Release</strong></td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Comments </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">March 12</td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (03/07/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">6th record high in    past 7 weeks</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Retail Sales (02/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Much better than expected sales    activity in Feb. (&amp; Jan.)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">March 13</td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Balance of Trade (01/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Smallest deficit since October    2002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">March 16</td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Industrial Production (02/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">March 17</td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Housing Starts (02/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">PPI (02/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">March 18</td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">CPI (02/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Policy Meeting Statement</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">March 19</td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (03/14/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="44" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="129" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Leading Eco. Indicators (02/09)</td>
<td width="172" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/03/16/bull-market-2/">Will Last Week’s Rally Carry Over?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/will-last-week%e2%80%99s-rally-carry-over/14984/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stocks Fall, ADP Report Says U.S. Shed 693,000 Jobs in December</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/stocks-fall-adp-report-says-us-shed-693000-jobs-in-december/11043</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/stocks-fall-adp-report-says-us-shed-693000-jobs-in-december/11043#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adp Employer Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jef]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Sectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Jobless Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=11043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. economy shed 693,000 jobs in December, a showing that was far worse than economists had expected and that may even have been the biggest monthly loss of jobs in more than 30 years, analysts said of a closely watched survey of business employment released yesterday (Tuesday).</p>
<p>The monthly ADP Employer Services (ADP) survey &#8211; which tracks private non-farm payroll employment &#8211; stunned economists, showing a surprising increase from the 476,000 jobs lost in November.</p>
<p>The decline was the worst in the history of the survey, which began reporting in 2001. And if the findings are matched by the official government jobs report, due out Friday, it would be the biggest employment drop since the U.S. recession of 1975.</p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#38;sid=apHhkpPTI5kY&#38;refer=home" target="_blank">This  is an&#8230;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. economy shed 693,000 jobs in December, a showing that was far worse than economists had expected and that may even have been the biggest monthly loss of jobs in more than 30 years, analysts said of a closely watched survey of business employment released yesterday (Tuesday).<span id="more-11043"></span></p>
<p>The monthly ADP Employer Services (ADP) survey &#8211; which tracks private non-farm payroll employment &#8211; stunned economists, showing a surprising increase from the 476,000 jobs lost in November.</p>
<p>The decline was the worst in the history of the survey, which began reporting in 2001. And if the findings are matched by the official government jobs report, due out Friday, it would be the biggest employment drop since the U.S. recession of 1975.</p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=apHhkpPTI5kY&amp;refer=home" target="_blank">This  is an eye-poppingly bad number</a>,” Art Hogan, the New York-based chief market  analyst at Jefferies &amp; Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=jef" target="_blank">JEF</a>), told <strong><em>Bloomberg  News</em></strong>. “The economy is in very difficult shape and that’s been proved  out over the economic data from the past month.”</p>
<p>In fact, the numbers echo a trio of downbeat economic reports from the manufacturing, housing and service sectors reported by <em><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/06/stock-market/" target="_blank">Money  Morning</a></span></em> just yesterday.  Those numbers very graphically portray the severity of the current recession.</p>
<p>The economy has shed 1.9 million jobs this year as payrolls have dropped the last 11 straight months. U.S. companies slashed 533,000 jobs in November, according to the U.S. Commerce Department, and the unemployment rate grew to 6.7%, its highest level since 1974.</p>
<p>Unemployment numbers are considered by economists to be a snapshot of the health of both the labor markets and broader economy.</p>
<p>Job losses of this magnitude have a profoundly negative impact on the U.S. economy &#8211; and major ripple effects on economies worldwide &#8211; because jobless consumers are forced to cut back on spending. Fully 70% of all domestic economic activity is powered by consumer spending.</p>
<p><strong>Stocks Can’t Weather the  Storm</strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p>In response to the latest news, U.S. stocks slid and experienced their worst losses in two weeks, reversing a pattern in which investors seemed to be ignoring bad news as they bid up shares and notched steady gains.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI" target="_blank">Dow Jones Industrial  Average</a> fell 245.16 points, or 2.72%, to close at 8,769.94. The <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP:.INX" target="_blank">Standard &amp; Poor’s  500 Index</a> declined 28.05 points, or 3.0%, to close at 906.65. The  tech-focused <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=INDEXNASDAQ:.IXIC" target="_blank">Nasdaq  Composite Index</a> fell 53.32 points, or 3.23%, to end the day at 1,599.06.</p>
<p>Intel Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=intc" target="_blank">INTC</a>) and Alcoa Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=AA" target="_blank">AA</a>) exacerbated the slide, providing still more evidence of declining corporate revenue and layoffs. Intel projected that fourth-quarter revenue would fall 23% from 2007 levels because of weak demand, while Alcoa announced it will eliminate 13,500 jobs, or 13% of its work force.</p>
<p>Intel shares dropped a little more than 6.0% yesterday,  while Alcoa shares shed more than 10% of their value.</p>
<p>“These are extraordinary times, requiring speed and decisiveness to address the current economic downturn,” Alcoa’s Chief Executive Officer Klaus Kleinfeld told <strong><em>MSNMoney</em></strong>.</p>
<p>The hardest-hit U.S. business sector was the service sector, which lost 473,000 jobs in December. The two other hard-hit sectors were consumer goods, which shed 220,000 jobs, and manufacturing, which jettisoned 120,000 workers.</p>
<p>“December does  typically see seasonal hiring for the holiday season and plainly the  anticipation of poor <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/34324d24-dcc6-11dd-a2a9-000077b07658.html" target="_blank">Christmas  sales has played a major role in pushing down the adjusted numbers</a>,” Alan  Ruskin, an analyst at RBS Global Banking &amp; Markets (ADR: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=rbs" target="_blank">RBS</a>) told <strong><em>The  Financial Times.</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>Official Government Report on  Tap Friday</strong></p>
<p>All eyes now turn to the afore-mentioned official government labor report, due on Friday. If the results match it would represent yet another historic number, making it the biggest employment drop since the 1975 recession.</p>
<p>ADP collects a wealth of information as it processes 500,000 payrolls for U.S. companies with aggregate employment of more than 24 million. It issues its report two days prior to the government report.</p>
<p>After it significantly undershot the government labor report in November, ADP changed its methodology “to improve the correspondence between nonfarm private employment estimates, and estimates published in the government report,” according the company’s <a href="http://www.adp.com/" target="_blank">website</a>. Even so, some economists are revising their  forecasts upwards.</p>
<p>“The drop in ADP employment in December is staggering and suggests that our original projection of a 500,000 decline in payrolls in December is too small,” <a href="http://www.rdqeconomics.com/" target="_blank">RDQ Economics</a> economists John Ryding  and Conrad DeQuadros wrote in a research note.</p>
<p>The official employment numbers on Friday could show that as many as 700,000 jobs were lost in December, according to Ian Sheperdson, chief economist at <a href="http://www.hifreqecon.com/" target="_blank">High Frequency Economics</a>.  That would be the biggest drop in 59 years.</p>
<p>“This is shockingly awful,” Mr Sheperdson said. “<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/34324d24-dcc6-11dd-a2a9-000077b07658.html" target="_blank">We  await Friday with trepidation</a>.”</p>
<p><a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/01/08/adp-jobs-report/">Source: Stocks Fall as ADP Report Says U.S. Shed 693,000 Jobs in December</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/stocks-fall-adp-report-says-us-shed-693000-jobs-in-december/11043/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.252 seconds -->

