<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contrarian Stock Market Investing News - Featuring Bargain Stocks &#187; JWN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/tag/jwn/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com</link>
	<description>Access market-beating ideas from the world&#039;s top investment gurus on stock market investing, the gold market, ETFs, Forex trading and real estate values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:01:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Contrarian Companies Expanding During Gloomy Economy</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/contrarian-companies-expanding-during-gloomy-economy/14696</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/contrarian-companies-expanding-during-gloomy-economy/14696#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Lass</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Lass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastern Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JWN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[luxury goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massive Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SKS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=14696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Massive unemployment? No problem! Adam Lass of the <a href="http://www.taipanpublishing.com"  class="alinks_links">Taipan</a> Publishing Group says that no one is buying luxury goods right now but he gives us two puts in the retail sector that are playing out well during the crisis.  </p>
<p>He also shares a British health care conglomerate that provides aid for troubled times and “sells even better when folks are broke.”</p>
<p>This from Adam:</p>
<blockquote><p>Buy into Eastern Europe&#8217;s depression or just make 114% on  ours: It&#8217;s your shot to call.</p>
<p>In case you hadn&#8217;t noticed, retail is in a bit of a pickle  these days. The Conference Board&#8217;s latest consumer poll puts their Confidence  Index down another 12.4 points, to yet another all-time low at 25.</p>
<p>Keeping in mind that anything below 50 is considered&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Massive unemployment? No problem! Adam Lass of the <a href="http://www.taipanpublishing.com"  class="alinks_links">Taipan</a> Publishing Group says that no one is buying luxury goods right now but he gives us two puts in the retail sector that are playing out well during the crisis.  </p>
<p>He also shares a British health care conglomerate that provides aid for troubled times and “sells even better when folks are broke.”</p>
<p>This from Adam:</p>
<blockquote><p>Buy into Eastern Europe&#8217;s depression or just make 114% on  ours: It&#8217;s your shot to call.</p>
<p>In case you hadn&#8217;t noticed, retail is in a bit of a pickle  these days. The Conference Board&#8217;s latest consumer poll puts their Confidence  Index down another 12.4 points, to yet another all-time low at 25.</p>
<p>Keeping in mind that anything below 50 is considered bad,  I&#8217;d have to say that a score of half that ought to be considered really bad.</p>
<p>No shock there, I suppose, since we are looking at massive  unemployment right about now. As of late last week, the official figure had us  at 8.1%, a 25-year high water mark for folks who are slowly sinking under  water.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s only looking at it percentage-wise. Our  population has grown roughly 45% since 1985, and 140% since 1930, so it&#8217;s safe  to say that there are probably more folks hanging around the corner wasting  time then ever before in the history of the country, including the dark days of  the Great Depression.</p>
<p>Depressing indeed, but before you start thinking this is  another one of Lass&#8217; loads of unalloyed dreck, I actually have found another  one of those oddball companies looking to expand during this dismal episode.</p>
<p><strong>But First&#8230; More Dreck!</strong></p>
<p>There is an odd thing about the current wreckage. Back in  2000, the majority of American households were involved in the stock market in  one way or another. This was the dawn of online investing, when most any shmoe  who could type their name with two fingers could get a trading account. Inside  the biz, many still refer to the tech boom and ensuing crash as the &#8220;March of  the Morons.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not very nice, but there it is. But don&#8217;t fret too much,  because this most recent crash was in many ways the exact opposite. This time  around, it was the wise guys themselves who sank trillions into unfathomable, unvaluable, and in the end, valueless debt arbitrage. The  very folks who should have known better fell deepest into the briar patch.</p>
<p>As a result, mega-discounters like <strong>Wal-Mart (<a title="Google Finance: (WMT:NYSE)" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=WMT%3ANYSE" target="_blank">WMT:NYSE</a>)</strong> are  actually reporting modest but significant increases in sales, while high-end  outfits <strong>Saks (<a title="Google Finance: (SKS:NYSE)" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=SKS%3ANYSE" target="_blank">SKS:NYSE</a>)</strong>, <strong>Nordstrom (<a title="Google Finance: (JWN:NYSE)" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=JWN%3ANYSE" target="_blank">JWN:NYSE</a>)</strong>, and <strong>Ann Taylor (<a title="Google Finance: (ANN:NYSE)" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=ANN%3ANYSE" target="_blank">ANN:NYSE</a>)</strong> are  reporting withering sales declines.</p>
<p>The folks in the Ann Taylor corner suite at 7 Times Square  (one wonders how long they will be able to afford THAT address eh?) are  specifically blaming the 20% plunge in Q4 on the fact that a remarkable number  of women no longer require the &#8220;business attire&#8221; that is ANN&#8217;s stock in trade.  The future is so &#8220;volatile&#8221; right now (that&#8217;s biz slang for &#8220;god-awful&#8221;) the  team at ANN won&#8217;t even put out a forecast for next quarter.</p>
<div>
<div style="border: 1px solid #debe7c; padding: 4px; background: #f2ead7 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; width: 500px; text-align: left;">
<p>If you didn&#8217;t turn <strong>every $1000 you invested last year into 113 GRAND</strong>, you really need to give me the next five minutes of your time&#8230;</p>
<p>As the Dow lost 40% of its value in 2008, one unorthodox analyst steered his readers to optimized one-year gains of 6,635%, 10,838%, and 11,359%.</p>
<p><a title="Get eight months worth of his biggest gainers for 2009 FREE" href="https://www.web-purchases.com/WOW/NWOWK308/landing.html" target="_blank">Here&#8217;s how to get eight months worth of his biggest gainers for 2009 FREE&#8230;</a></div>
</div>
<p><strong>The Two Fashion Items That Sell Even Better When Folks Are Broke</strong></p>
<p>But there is one &#8220;wearable&#8221; shop that is not pulling in its  horns. In fact, it is looking to expand its offerings into Eastern Europe. And  yes, they know that the once-and-future Eastern Bloc is melting down as fast as  (if not faster than) we are here in the States. In fact, they are counting on  it.</p>
<p>I am referring to <strong>SSL International  PLC (<a title="Bloombery (SSL:LN)" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=SSL%3ALN" target="_blank">SSL:LN</a>)</strong>. This Brit healthcare conglomerate has the rights to  distribute Dr. Scholl&#8217;s foot aids overseas. Just imagine all those sore, tired  guys pounding the pavement looking for jobs! But SSL&#8217;s  real winner in these troubled times is their Durex condoms line.</p>
<p>As per Chief Executive Officer Garry Watts, SSL intends on  using the downturn to bump its stake 50% in a unit that distributes  contraceptives to Russia and nine other eastern European countries. And that&#8217;s  just the first kiss, as it were: By 2010 they hope to buy up the entire  operation.</p>
<p><strong>Blunt and to the Point</strong></p>
<p>In a recent interview with Bloomberg&#8217;s Kari Lundgren and  Howard Mustoe, Watts put it rather succinctly: <em>&#8220;Russian people aren&#8217;t going  to stop having sex any more than British people are. We&#8217;re not immune from the  downturn, but it&#8217;s a bit like Pizza Hut: If you&#8217;re not going out, then you  might be willing to drop a five-pound vibrator ring into your trolley.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Hey, he said it, not me, folks. Okay, stinky feet and  Russian condoms are slightly unsettling thoughts (especially around lunchtime).  But Watt&#8217;s got a point and he&#8217;s grinning when he makes it, which makes him  different than 95% of the CEOs I speak with these days, who can barely manage a  forced rictus smile.</p>
<p>If this is just too much for you to wrap your mind around,  and you still want to grab a piece of the action in the &#8220;Retail Space,&#8221; you can  always pick up some of the puts we are recommending in my own <em>WaveStrength</em><em> Options Weekly </em>column.</p>
<p>Like I mentioned earlier, no one is buying luxury goods.  Thus, our <strong>Best Buy (<a title="Google Finance: (BBY:NYSE)" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=BBY%3ANYSE" target="_blank">BBY:NYSE</a>)</strong> play is up some 40% as I sit to write, while our <strong>Disney (<a title="Google Finance: (DIS:NYSE)" href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=DIS%3ANYSE" target="_blank">DIS:NYSE</a>)</strong> play is up  114%.</p>
<p><strong>Source: <a href="http://www.taipanpublishinggroup.com/taipan-daily-030909.html">Pick Me Up a Three-Pack When You Go Out, Dear</a></strong></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/contrarian-companies-expanding-during-gloomy-economy/14696/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Economy in 2009, Pain Will Precede the Promise</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/us-economy-in-2009-pain-will-precede-the-promise/10612</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/us-economy-in-2009-pain-will-precede-the-promise/10612#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shah Gilani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Slowdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed Funds Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gdp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hilton Hotels Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JWN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEHMQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pension Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shah Gilani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TGT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Neiman Marcus Group Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Jobless Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=10612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If there’s a proverb that captures the outlook for the U.S. economy in the New Year, it’s the one that says: “It’s always darkest before the dawn.”</p>
<p>Regardless of any formal announcement of whether or not the United States drops into an actual recession, the ongoing credit crisis guarantees a contraction of the American economy by virtually every measure we know. That period of darkness will be marked by a dramatic slowdown in economic activity, as well as by rising unemployment, additional declines in U.S. stock prices, and constant volatility. It could last as long as 12-18 months.</p>
<p>But when the dawn does come, it will be one to remember. If U.S. President-elect Barack Obama gets it right &#8211; and I have&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there’s a proverb that captures the outlook for the U.S. economy in the New Year, it’s the one that says: “It’s always darkest before the dawn.”</p>
<p>Regardless of any formal announcement of whether or not the United States drops into an actual recession, the ongoing credit crisis guarantees a contraction of the American economy by virtually every measure we know. That period of darkness will be marked by a dramatic slowdown in economic activity, as well as by rising unemployment, additional declines in U.S. stock prices, and constant volatility. It could last as long as 12-18 months.</p>
<p>But when the dawn does come, it will be one to remember. If U.S. President-elect Barack Obama gets it right &#8211; and I have every reason to believe that he will &#8211; then investors will be presented with the greatest investment opportunity of our generation. At that point, shares of American companies will be at such low levels that wholesale buying by individuals, mutual funds, pension funds, institutional money managers, and foreign-controlled sovereign wealth funds, will generate gains that will not only make us whole, they will make us rich once again.</p>
<h3>A Market Mandela</h3>
<p>Creating an analysis of the U.S.  economy’s outlook for the New Year is akin to creating a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandala" target="_blank">mandala</a>, a geometric work of art whose pattern, symbolically or metaphysically, represents a microcosm of the universe from the human perspective. In some Buddhist temples, mandalas are made of tiny colored beads, painstakingly created by several monks as a form of meditation. In celebration of the ever-changing nature of the universe, the mandala is then joyously shaken by its creators, until it is once again nothing more than chaos embodied in a box of colored beads.</p>
<p>Regardless of the big picture, analysis of a mandala &#8211; or the economy &#8211; always starts at the center and emanates outward. With the U.S. economy, that centerpiece is credit. The credit crisis has shaken the complex mandala that is our economy and transformed the United States economy into chaos. It’s complex because this economic-forecast mandala derived its form from thousands of individual pieces &#8211; in the case of the economy, from scores of data points, many of which are currently dark and foreboding.</p>
<p>The credit crisis we are experiencing results from the contraction &#8211; or worse, the cessation &#8211; of lending. Under normal circumstances, institutions and markets freely facilitate capital movement between lenders and borrowers. But that’s not happening, now.</p>
<p>Because of a lack of transparency into the balance sheets of borrowers holding such complex and illiquid securities as collateralized debt obligations, credit-default swaps, and non-performing loans, and because of increasing recessionary fears affecting businesses and households, lenders don’t want to increase their loan exposure. Banks are holding onto the cash and liquid securities they control, using them as a cushion against their own potential losses. The U.S. Treasury Department’s direct-to-bank capital injections do not alter these banking realities. In fact, as a <strong><em><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links">Money Morning</a></em></strong> investigative story recently demonstrated, instead of using these taxpayer-provided infusions to increase their lending, these <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/30/banking-system-bailout-money/" target="_blank">banks  are using the money to finance takeover deals</a>.</p>
<h3>The Recipe for a Recession</h3>
<p>Whether or not the United States  is technically in a recession ultimately will be divined by the <a href="http://www.nber.org/" target="_blank">National Bureau of Economic Research</a> (NBER).  The business-cycle dating committee of this privately run, nonprofit economic  research group <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=5b2a1b8a6b684e7988b9c5bdd893b081&amp;siteid=nwhpm&amp;sguid=KutBgB74bkqGZ7oUpERU9A" target="_blank">is  right now studying five factors in an attempt to determine if the United States  has entered a recession</a> and, if so, when that downturn started, <strong><em>MarketWatch.com</em></strong> reported. Those five factors are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Gross Domestic Product (GDP).</li>
<li>Industrial production.</li>
<li>Employment</li>
<li>Income.</li>
<li>Retail sales.</li>
</ul>
<p>Regardless of any formal announcement by the NBER of whether we’re in a recession, the credit crisis guarantees a general contraction of economic activity, by every measure.</p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/07/news/economy/karydakis_jobs.fortune/?postversion=2008110715" target="_blank">“Any doubt that we’re officially in a  recession can be put aside,”</a> Anthony Karydakis, former chief U.S.  economist for JPMorgan Asset Management (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=jpm" target="_blank">JPM</a>) &#8211; and now a professor  at New York University’s Stern School of Business &#8211; recently wrote in <strong><em>Fortune</em></strong> magazine. “The rapid deterioration of labor markets points to a sharp decline in hours worked and output in the fourth quarter. This is likely to lead to a decline in personal consumption to the tune of 5.0% or so for that period. Since [consumer spending] makes up about 70% of the economy, the stage has already been set for real GDP to shrink at a more than 4.0% rate in the fourth quarter.”</p>
<p>Confirmation of that belief is evident by looking at each of the NBER’s five key indicators.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Gross Domestic Product (GDP)</strong>: The U.S. Commerce Department estimated that the U.S. economy, as measured by GDP, rose 0.9% in the first quarter. In the second quarter, GDP advanced an estimated 2.8%. For the third quarter, GDP declined an estimated 0.3%. My own econometric models suggest that GDP actually contracted at a 1.5% pace in the third quarter and will decline another 2.75% in the fourth quarter. For the year, that would mean the U.S. economy actually fell 0.55%. The U.S. economy last posted a full year’s negative GDP in 1991, when it declined 0.2%. <strong>Verdict: Recession</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>Industrial       Production</strong>: This measure of output by the nation’s factories and mines dropped 2.8% in September, and a very steep 6.0% in the third quarter. <strong>Verdict: Recession.</strong></li>
<li><strong>Employment</strong>: The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics announced Friday that October’s unemployment rate was 6.5%, a jump of 0.4%, which was double what most economists expected, and also its highest level in 14 years. The economy has now lost a total of 1.2 million jobs since the beginning of the year, with <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/07/news/economy/karydakis_jobs.fortune/?postversion=2008110715" target="_blank"> nearly half of those losses  occurring in the last three months </a>alone, pointing to an  acceleration in the pace of erosion in labor markets. Karydakis, the Stern  School professor, wrote in<br />
<strong> <em> Fortune </em> </strong>: “By way of comparison, during the 2001 recession and in the sluggish growth that followed in 2002-03, the unemployment rate reached a peak of only 6.3%, in June 2003. We’ve already exceeded that mark and, given that we are still in the early phase of the current recession, the unemployment rate should be expected to push toward the 7.5% range &#8211; and possibly higher &#8211; during the next three months to six months.”<br />
<strong> Verdict: Recession.</strong></li>
<li><strong>Income</strong>: Personal income increased $24.5 billion, or 0.2%, and disposable personal income (DPI) increased $25.7 billion, or 0.2%, in September. <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/pce.asp" target="_blank">Personal consumption       expenditures</a> (PCE) decreased $33.6 billion, or 0.3%. Excluding the       rebate payments made to U.S. taxpayers under the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_Stimulus_Act_of_2008" target="_blank">Economic       Stimulus Act of 2008</a>, DPI increased $30.3 billion, or 0.3%, in       September, and increased $44.0 billion, or 0.4%, in August. <strong>Verdict:       Too close to call</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>Retail       Sales</strong>: October retail sales are coming in well below already-diminished expectations, and some reports have been downright depressing &#8211; including <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=3942017" target="_blank">The Neiman Marcus       Group Inc</a>. -26.8%; The Gap Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGPS" target="_blank">GPS</a>) -16%; The       Nordstrom Group (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AJWN" target="_blank">JWN</a>)       -15.7%; J.C. Penny Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=jcp" target="_blank">JCP</a>) -13%; Kohl’s Corp.       (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AKSS" target="_blank">KSS</a>)       -9%;  Ltd. Brands Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ltd" target="_blank">LTD</a>) -9%; Target Corp.       Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=tgt" target="_blank">TGT</a>) -4.8%;       and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=wmt" target="_blank">WMT</a>)       +2.4%. In a report last week, Moody’s Investors Service (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mco" target="_blank">MCO</a>) projected that the retail sector’s woes will continue into 2009 as consumers cut back on buying apparel, footwear and accessories “in order to save money for essentials.” The credit rating firm said in a separate report that holiday spending “will prove even weaker than expected,” amid October’s financial-market swoon. <strong>Verdict: Recession.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>If U.S. exports are taken out of the GDP calculations going back to January, it’s apparent that there has been very little domestic growth in the economy. And when revisions are finalized in the next few months, we’ll be looking back at the recession that we’re all but certain is upon us right now. Until the credit markets are freed up and borrowers are extended credit at reasonable rates, it’s unlikely that credit, the centerpiece of the economy, will be anything other than a major cog in the wheel.</p>
<p>There are some signs of a thaw,  but not anytime soon. The <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/10/federal-funds-target-rate/" target="_blank">U.S.  Federal Reserve’s lowering</a> of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_funds_rate" target="_blank">Fed  Funds target rate</a> to 1.0%, and coordinated rate reductions by the Bank of England and the European Central Bank, as well as other major world-wide central banks, may start to ease the stranglehold gripping the worldwide credit markets. The London interbank offered rate (Libor), a critical interest rate against which trillions of dollars of mortgages, bank loans and derivatives are priced, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/23/mortgage-re-sets/" target="_blank">dropped to 2.39%  last week</a> from a high of 4.82% on Oct. 10.</p>
<p>The prospect of President-elect Obama’s choosing a different means of attacking the credit crisis will be closely watched and, by itself, may create an air of confidence that perceptions will change. But changed perceptions will not be enough.</p>
<p>The truth about our economic outlook is that it is predicated on demonstrably better transparency. If U.S. banks follow the lead of their European counterparts, which <a href="http://www.iasplus.com/europe/0811ec.pdf" target="_blank">have recently been freed from  fair-value, mark-to-market accounting</a>, and which may retroactively mark assets to “internal models” back to July, then balance-sheet clarity will continue to be cloaked in darkness. Lack of confidence in the banking system will persist, especially among the banks themselves. The first order of attack needs to be the creation of a fundamental leadership position that leads to an open, transparent and accountable measure of balance sheet assets and liabilities. As long as failing banks are being propped up, this cycle of credit contraction will persist.</p>
<p>The outlook for the economy is inextricably tied to the price of oil. The run-up of benchmark crude this summer to the record $145 a barrel level, and its subsequent fall to half that level, has wreaked havoc throughout the economy. Similarly, the run-up in commodity prices, and their subsequent fall, also has caused a lot of damage. Together, the dramatic rise and fall in the pricde of oil and other commodities is a harbinger of greater volatility in the future.</p>
<h3>Follow the Money</h3>
<p>Follow the money. Capital rapidly inflated the tech-stock bubble. When that bubble burst, capital flowed into and flooded the hard-asset world of real estate. When that bubble burst fast, speculative money dove into oil and commodities. When the U.S. and world economies looked weak, those bubbles burst. The looming threat of inflation this past summer instantly gave way after the drop of oil, gold, metals and agricultural commodities. And now, <em>deflation</em> is seen as the looming  threat on the horizon.</p>
<p>Which threat should we worry about?</p>
<p>The answer is &#8211; both. The prospect for near-term deflation seems all too real. As raw material prices fall and finished good prices fall due to a lack of purchasing power resulting from lack of credit and world-wide recessionary fears, the U.S. consumer has fundamentally changed his or her collective psychology. Is U.S. consumerism, which is responsible for 70% of GDP, in full retreat? If it is, as all measures project, then it’s likely that government stimulus efforts will overshoot their intended mark.<br />
Just look at what the United  States has done already as it battles this financial crisis. It has:</p>
<ul>
<li>Handed out  more than $150 billion in stimulus rebate checks.</li>
<li>Floated a  $700 billion financial bailout rescue plan &#8211; almost $160 billion of which has  already been placed.</li>
<li>Bailed out  American International Group Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=aig" target="_blank">AIG</a>), to the tune of $125  billion.</li>
<li>Covered JP  Morgan Chase &amp; Co.’s bet on taking over<br />
<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=The+Bear+Stearns+Cos" target="_blank">The Bear  Stearns Cos</a>. &#8211; to the tune of $29 billion.</li>
<li>Looked to <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/11/04/big-three/" target="_blank">lend struggling  automakers</a> $25 billion.</li>
<li>Agreed to  guarantee depositors at all banks.</li>
<li>Stepped in  to buy commercial paper that no one else will buy.</li>
<li>Guaranteed  money-market-fund investors.</li>
<li>And  backstopped the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), Fannie Mae (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=fnm" target="_blank">FNM</a>) and Freddie Mac (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=fre" target="_blank">FRE</a>).</li>
</ul>
<p>And now we’re getting wind of another stimulus package and more  help for everyone.</p>
<p>If, in six months to a year, the credit markets are facilitating borrowers again, the massive buildup of U.S. debt will result in a falling dollar and higher interest rates.</p>
<p>That spells inflation.</p>
<p>A massive re-inflation of the economy portends another flood of speculative money into oil and commodities. The cycles are increasingly condensed, more volatile and will be increasingly more disruptive.</p>
<p>Welcome to the brave new world of  global finance and speculation.</p>
<p>The Federal Reserve’s balance sheet has ballooned from $900 billion to more than $1.8 trillion. That’s 13% of GDP. The Treasury Department has telegraphed <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/11/05/700-billion-banking-bailout/" target="_blank">its intention to float $550 billion of debt in the fourth quarter and estimates it will have to float another $368 billion in the first quarter of 2009</a>. Our  national debt will then be close to 49% of GDP.</p>
<p>If there is an easing of credit in the economy, and borrowers come to market with the pent-up demand that has not been met for the past year, the competition for funds will raise interest rates. Higher interest rates will counter any stimulus effect from government programs.</p>
<p>Who will buy U.S. Treasury debt if the world is less apprehensive about credit quality? Lenders will once again seek higher returns, potentially forcing the Treasury Department to increase its rates. The potential of this event may sink the dollar if investors perceive that the U.S. economy is stagnant and the world is awash in dollars. The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yield_curve" target="_blank">yield curve</a> &#8211; the spread between the Treasury’s two-year and the 10-year paper &#8211; has been steepening. A steepening yield curve, where short-term borrowing costs are low and long-term rates considerably higher, is good for banks that borrow short and lend long.</p>
<p>But if the perception of risk  diminishes, and the perception of future inflation increases, the <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/invertedyieldcurve.asp" target="_blank">yield curve  will invert</a> and the threat of rising rates will cause a sell-off in the short end of the curve and a rush into longer-dated maturities. Any increase in short-term interest rates would be painful for struggling banks. An <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/invertedyieldcurve.asp" target="_blank">inverted  yield curv</a>e would be devastating, and inevitably would lead to more bank  failures.</p>
<h3>Home on the Range …</h3>
<p>At the core of the U.S. economy sits a desperately ailing piece of the mandala &#8211; the U.S. housing market. The once bright prospect of home ownership, which historically formed a beautiful economic picture, right now doesn’t exist. For most Americans, the family home constituted the bulk of their wealth. Or at least it did. And this family financial portrait will get worse before it gets better, since the real estate collapse is far from over. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=gs" target="_blank">GS</a>), for instance, projects  another 15% drop in housing prices.</p>
<p>I think that’s conservative. Mortgage rates are actually rising as Fannie and Freddie have to pay higher interest on their short-term notes and bonds. Thirty-year fixed-rate mortgage paper averaged 6.47% last week, up from its 52-week low of 5.36%. The 15-year fixed paper was trading at 6.18%, up from its 52-week low of 4.91% (based on <a href="http://www.bankrate.com/" target="_blank">Bankrate.com</a> (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:RATE" target="_blank">RATE</a>) rate surveys). This trend is definitely not our friend. As housing prices continue to fall, and inventories stagnate and grow in many areas, homeowners are increasingly underwater and are increasingly entertaining foreclosure as a viable economic alternative to indentured servitude.<br />
The <a href="http://hopeforhomeownersact.us/" target="_blank">Hope for Homeowners Plan</a>, which looks to lower interest rates and reduce principal on mortgages, and which makes homeowners pay a share of the appreciation on their home to their lender when they sell it, was initiated in October and was expected to garner some 400,000 takers. As of last week, according to <strong><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></strong>,  there had been only 42 takers. That’s not a misprint &#8211; 42 &#8211; I even checked with <strong><em>The Journal</em></strong>.</p>
<p>In the real estate realm, the proverbial “other shoe” hasn’t dropped yet, but certainly is dangling &#8211; and that’s commercial real estate. As homeowners writhe in agony and stop spending, retailers will go out of business, businesses of all stripes will suffer and commercial real estate will implode. The leverage left over from just the private equity foray into commercial real estate in the acquisitive 2006-2007 period is staggering. Refinancing will be impossible. Banks are stuck with hundreds of billions of dollars of leveraged loans that they took on as bridge and mezzanine financing from the private-equity shops alone, at the time believing they would  be able to securitize those loans and sell them off to investors.</p>
<p>There’s no chance of that, now.</p>
<p>One deal in particular  illustrates this entire mess.  Private  equity behemoth The Blackstone Group LP (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=bx" target="_blank">BX</a>) took <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=Hilton+Hotels+Corp" target="_blank">Hilton Hotels  Corp</a>. private for $26 billion. Blackstone put up $6 billion of its own money as equity and borrowed the other $20 billion from Bear Stearns, Bank of America Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=bac" target="_blank">BAC</a>),  Deutsche Bank AG (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=db" target="_blank">DB</a>),  Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ms" target="_blank">MS</a>),  Merrill Lynch &amp; Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mer" target="_blank">MER</a>)  and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (OTC: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=OTC%3ALEHMQ" target="_blank">LEHMQ</a>).</p>
<p>Based on a current analysis of the deal at the multiple of seven times projected cash flow that the market currently puts on Starwood Hotels &amp; Resorts Worldwide Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AHOT" target="_blank">HOT</a>) -  Hilton’s nearest rival &#8211; if Blackstone values its property comparably, it will have to mark its Hilton holdings down 50%, because it paid 13 times projected cash flow. That wipes out all of Blackstone’s equity in the deal. What’s more, the $4 billion portion of the loan that Bear Stearns took on, courtesy of JP Morgan Chase casting off Bear’s orphaned liabilities, now sits on the Fed’s balance sheet &#8211; and isn’t likely to go anywhere anytime soon.</p>
<p>Until the real estate cycle completes its implosion and begins to stabilize, there’s nothing that will fundamentally alter the outlook for the economy. This is Ground Zero. President-elect Obama must resist creating only a political solution to the overwhelming economic problem of declining house prices and declining real estate prices in general. Any attempt to put a band aid on this economic plague will only delay the day of reckoning. I regret deeply the conclusion that the lake must be drained before we can realistically climb out of it. But there just aren’t enough ferrymen to get us all to shore.</p>
<h3>Always a Silver Lining &#8211; My  Forecast</h3>
<p>The outlook for the economy is not rosy &#8211; and that’s an understatement. But there is a silver lining. Even in the near term, the stock market will present innumerable wealth-creation opportunities.</p>
<ul>
<li>First, there  are plenty of shorting opportunities out there now, and more will present  themselves in the future.</li>
<li>Second, in due course &#8211; in perhaps 12-18 months &#8211; we will be presented with the investment opportunity of our generation. If President-elect Obama gets it right, and I believe he’s got the potential to bring us all together and get the country through this (and if you’re reading this Mr. President-elect, I’d like to put in my vote for [New York Fed President] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Geithner" target="_blank">Timothy Geithner</a> as next U.S. treasury secretary), American companies will be able to be purchased so cheaply that fortunes will be made. The recovery will not only make us whole, it will make our people and our nation rich again.</li>
</ul>
<p>I have absolutely no doubt that the United States will lead the world back into balance. The sea change that has arrived is the result of the conservative experiment having lost its true moorings, pushing the economy into disaster. Not that a wholesale swinging of the pendulum to the other side would be good. In fact, it would be disastrous. We have the potential to end up with a new, fair, transparent and judiciously regulated environment where capital formation can again spread its wings and the U.S. economy can fly.</p>
<p>There are new hands reaching into the colorful box of beads that comprise the American landscape and economy. From any human perspective, the United States is more than a microcosm of the universe; it is the center of the world as we know it. It will take time to construct the new mandala. We all need to meditate on the process to ensure that the design we embrace will ultimately be inclusive, forward-looking and &#8211; like all great art &#8211; an inspiration to all who view it.</p>
<p><a class="titleref" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/12/29/recession/">For the U.S. Economy in the New Year, the Pain Will  Precede the Promise</a></p>
<p>Editor&#8217;s Note: This is the second installment of a new series that  looks at the global investing outlook for 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/us-economy-in-2009-pain-will-precede-the-promise/10612/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How This Crisis Could Make You A Fortune</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/how-this-crisis-could-make-you-a-fortune/8102</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/how-this-crisis-could-make-you-a-fortune/8102#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shah Gilani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Downturn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JWN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEHMQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shah Gilani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock bargains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TGT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Neiman Marcus Group Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US housing crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Jobless Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=8102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By all reasonable measures, we are already in a recession, says <strong>Shah Gilani</strong>. Deflation has become today&#8217;s number one threat. But massive government rescues mean another bout of inflation looms on the horizon. Shah says investors should look to short vulnerable stocks in 2009. But in 12-18 months, they should be prepared for a &#8220;generational opportunity&#8221; to make a fortune.</p>
<p>This from <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links">Money Morning</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>If there’s a proverb that captures the outlook for the U.S. economy in the New Year, it’s the one that says: “It’s always darkest before the dawn.”</p>
<p>Regardless of any formal announcement of whether or not the United States drops into an actual recession, the ongoing credit crisis guarantees a contraction of the American economy by virtually every measure&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By all reasonable measures, we are already in a recession, says <strong>Shah Gilani</strong>. Deflation has become today&#8217;s number one threat. But massive government rescues mean another bout of inflation looms on the horizon. Shah says investors should look to short vulnerable stocks in 2009. But in 12-18 months, they should be prepared for a &#8220;generational opportunity&#8221; to make a fortune.</p>
<p>This from <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links">Money Morning</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>If there’s a proverb that captures the outlook for the U.S. economy in the New Year, it’s the one that says: “It’s always darkest before the dawn.”</p>
<p>Regardless of any formal announcement of whether or not the United States drops into an actual recession, the ongoing credit crisis guarantees a contraction of the American economy by virtually every measure we know. That period of darkness will be marked by a dramatic slowdown in economic activity, as well as by rising unemployment, additional declines in U.S. stock prices, and constant volatility. It could last as long as 12-18 months.</p>
<p>But when the dawn does come, it will be one to remember. If U.S. President-elect Barack Obama gets it right – and I have every reason to believe that he will – then investors will be presented with the greatest investment opportunity of our generation. At that point, shares of American companies will be at such low levels that wholesale buying by individuals, mutual funds, pension funds, institutional money managers, and foreign-controlled sovereign wealth funds, will generate gains that will not only make us whole, they will make us rich once again.</p>
<p><strong>The Recipe for a Recession</strong></p>
<p>Whether or not the United States  is technically in a recession ultimately will be divined by the <a href="http://www.nber.org/">National Bureau of Economic Research</a> (NBER).  The business-cycle dating committee of this privately run, nonprofit economic  research group <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=5b2a1b8a6b684e7988b9c5bdd893b081&amp;siteid=nwhpm&amp;sguid=KutBgB74bkqGZ7oUpERU9A">is  right now studying five factors in an attempt to determine if the United States  has entered a recession</a> and, if so, when that downturn started, <strong><em>MarketWatch.com</em></strong> reported. Those five factors are:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Gross Domestic Product (GDP).</li>
<li>Industrial production.</li>
<li>Employment</li>
<li>Income.</li>
<li>Retail sales.</li>
</ul>
<p>Regardless of any formal announcement by the NBER of whether we’re in a recession, the credit crisis guarantees a general contraction of economic activity, by every measure.</p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/07/news/economy/karydakis_jobs.fortune/?postversion=2008110715">“Any doubt that we’re officially in a  recession can be put aside,”</a> Anthony Karydakis, former chief U.S.  economist for JPMorgan Asset Management (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=jpm">JPM</a>) – and now a professor  at New York University’s Stern School of Business – recently wrote in <strong><em>Fortune</em></strong> magazine. “The rapid deterioration of labor markets points to a sharp decline in hours worked and output in the fourth quarter. This is likely to lead to a decline in personal consumption to the tune of 5.0% or so for that period. Since [consumer spending] makes up about 70% of the economy, the stage has already been set for real GDP to shrink at a more than 4.0% rate in the fourth quarter.”</p>
<p>Confirmation of that  belief is evident by looking at each of the NBER’s five key indicators.</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><strong>Gross       Domestic Product (GDP)</strong>: The U.S. Commerce Department estimated that the U.S. economy, as measured by GDP, rose 0.9% in the first quarter. In the second quarter, GDP advanced an estimated 2.8%. For the third quarter, GDP declined an estimated 0.3%. <strong>My own econometric models suggest that GDP actually contracted at a 1.5% pace in the third quarter and will decline another 2.75% in the fourth quarter</strong>. For the year, that would mean the U.S. economy actually fell 0.55%. The U.S. economy last posted a full year’s negative GDP in 1991, when it declined 0.2%. <strong>Verdict: Recession</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>Industrial       Production</strong>: This measure of output by the nation’s factories and mines dropped 2.8% in September, and a very steep 6.0% in the third quarter. <strong>Verdict: Recession.</strong></li>
<li><strong>Employment</strong>: The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics announced Friday that October’s unemployment rate was 6.5%, a jump of 0.4%, which was double what most economists expected, and also its highest level in 14 years. The economy has now lost a total of 1.2 million jobs since the beginning of the year, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/07/news/economy/karydakis_jobs.fortune/?postversion=2008110715">with nearly half of those losses       occurring in the last three months alone</a>, pointing to an acceleration in the pace of erosion in labor markets. Karydakis, the Stern School professor, wrote in <strong><em>Fortune</em></strong>: “By way of comparison, during the 2001 recession and in the sluggish growth that followed in 2002-03, the unemployment rate reached a peak of only 6.3%, in June 2003. We’ve already exceeded that mark and, given that we are still in the early phase of the current recession, the unemployment rate should be expected to push toward the 7.5% range – and possibly higher – during the next three months to six months.”<strong> Verdict: Recession.</strong></li>
<li><strong>Income</strong>: Personal income increased $24.5 billion, or 0.2%, and disposable personal income (DPI) increased $25.7 billion, or 0.2%, in September. <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/pce.asp">Personal consumption       expenditures</a> (PCE) decreased $33.6 billion, or 0.3%. Excluding the       rebate payments made to U.S. taxpayers under the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_Stimulus_Act_of_2008">Economic       Stimulus Act of 2008</a>, DPI increased $30.3 billion, or 0.3%, in       September, and increased $44.0 billion, or 0.4%, in August. <strong>Verdict:       Too close to call</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>Retail       Sales</strong>: October retail sales are coming in well below already-diminished expectations, and some reports have been downright depressing – including <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=3942017">The Neiman Marcus       Group Inc</a>. -26.8%; <strong>The Gap Inc</strong>. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGPS">GPS</a>) –16%; <strong>The       Nordstrom Group </strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AJWN">JWN</a>)       -15.7%; <strong>J.C. Penny Co. Inc.</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=jcp">JCP</a>) -13%; <strong>Kohl’s Corp.</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AKSS">KSS</a>)       -9%;  <strong>Ltd. Brands Inc. </strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ltd">LTD</a>) -9%; <strong>Target Corp.       Inc.</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=tgt">TGT</a>) -4.8%;       and <strong>Wal-Mart Stores Inc.</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=wmt">WMT</a>)       +2.4%. In a report last week, <strong>Moody’s Investors Service</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mco">MCO</a>) projected that the retail sector’s woes will continue into 2009 as consumers cut back on buying apparel, footwear and accessories “in order to save money for essentials.” The credit rating firm said in a separate report that holiday spending “will prove even weaker than expected,” amid October’s financial-market swoon. <strong>Verdict: Recession.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>If U.S. exports are taken out of the GDP calculations going back to January, it’s apparent that there has been very little domestic growth in the economy. And when revisions are finalized in the next few months, we’ll be looking back at the recession that we’re all but certain is upon us right now. Until the credit markets are freed up and borrowers are extended credit at reasonable rates, it’s unlikely that credit, the centerpiece of the economy, will be anything other than a major cog in the wheel.</p>
<p>There are some signs of a thaw,  but not anytime soon. The <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/10/federal-funds-target-rate/">U.S.  Federal Reserve’s lowering</a> of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_funds_rate" target="_blank">Fed  Funds target rate</a> to 1.0%, and coordinated rate reductions by the Bank of England and the European Central Bank, as well as other major world-wide central banks, may start to ease the stranglehold gripping the worldwide credit markets. The <a href="file:///H:/Money%20Morning%20News%20Story%20Files%20%28Week%20Ending%20Nov.%2014,%202008%29/London%20Interbank%20Offered%20Rate,">London  interbank offered rate</a> (Libor), a critical interest rate against which  trillions of dollars of mortgages, bank loans and derivatives are priced, <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/10/23/mortgage-re-sets/">dropped to 2.39%  last week</a> from a high of 4.82% on Oct. 10.</p>
<p>The prospect of President-elect Obama’s choosing a different means of attacking the credit crisis will be closely watched and, by itself, may create an air of confidence that perceptions will change. But changed perceptions will not be enough.<br />
The truth about our economic outlook is that it is predicated on demonstrably better transparency. If U.S. banks follow the lead of their European counterparts, which <a href="http://www.iasplus.com/europe/0811ec.pdf">have recently been freed from  fair-value, mark-to-market accounting</a>, and which may retroactively mark assets to “internal models” back to July, then balance-sheet clarity will continue to be cloaked in darkness. Lack of confidence in the banking system will persist, especially among the banks themselves. The first order of attack needs to be the creation of a fundamental leadership position that leads to an open, transparent and accountable measure of balance sheet assets and liabilities. As long as failing banks are being propped up, this cycle of credit contraction will persist.</p>
<p>The outlook for the economy is inextricably tied to the price of oil. The run-up of benchmark crude this summer to the record $145 a barrel level, and its subsequent fall to half that level, has wreaked havoc throughout the economy. Similarly, the run-up in commodity prices, and their subsequent fall, also has caused a lot of damage. Together, the dramatic rise and fall in the pricde of oil and other commodities is a harbinger of greater volatility in the future.</p>
<h3>Follow the Money</h3>
<p>Follow the money. Capital rapidly inflated the tech-stock bubble. When that bubble burst, capital flowed into and flooded the hard-asset world of real estate. When that bubble burst fast, speculative money dove into oil and commodities. When the U.S. and world economies looked weak, those bubbles burst. The looming threat of inflation this past summer instantly gave way after the drop of oil, gold, metals and agricultural commodities. And now, <em>deflation</em> is seen as the looming  threat on the horizon.</p>
<p>Which threat should we worry about?</p>
<p>The answer is – both. The prospect for near-term deflation seems all too real. As raw material prices fall and finished good prices fall due to a lack of purchasing power resulting from lack of credit and world-wide recessionary fears, the U.S. consumer has fundamentally changed his or her collective psychology. Is U.S. consumerism, which is responsible for 70% of GDP, in full retreat? If it is, as all measures project, then it’s likely that government stimulus efforts will overshoot their intended mark.<br />
Just look at what the United  States has done already as it battles this financial crisis. It has:</p>
<ul>
<li>Handed out  more than $150 billion in stimulus rebate checks.</li>
<li>Floated a  $700 billion financial bailout rescue plan – almost $160 billion of which has  already been placed.</li>
<li>Bailed out  American International Group Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=aig">AIG</a>), to the tune of $125  billion.</li>
<li>Covered JP  Morgan Chase &amp; Co.’s bet on taking over <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=The+Bear+Stearns+Cos">The Bear  Stearns Cos</a>. – to the tune of $29 billion.</li>
<li>Looked to <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/11/04/big-three/">lend struggling  automakers</a> $25 billion.</li>
<li>Agreed to  guarantee depositors at all banks.</li>
<li>Stepped in  to buy commercial paper that no one else will buy.</li>
<li>Guaranteed  money-market-fund investors.</li>
<li>And  backstopped the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), Fannie Mae (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=fnm">FNM</a>) and Freddie Mac (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=fre">FRE</a>).</li>
</ul>
<p>And now we’re getting wind of another stimulus package and more  help for everyone.</p>
<p>If, in six months to a year, the credit markets are facilitating borrowers again, the massive buildup of U.S. debt will result in a falling dollar and higher interest rates.</p>
<p>That spells inflation.</p>
<p>A massive re-inflation of the economy portends another flood of speculative money into oil and commodities. The cycles are increasingly condensed, more volatile and will be increasingly more disruptive.</p>
<p>Welcome to the brave new world of  global finance and speculation.</p>
<p>The Federal Reserve’s balance sheet has ballooned from $900 billion to more than $1.8 trillion. That’s 13% of GDP. The Treasury Department has telegraphed <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/11/05/700-billion-banking-bailout/">its intention to float $550 billion of debt in the fourth quarter and estimates it will have to float another $368 billion in the first quarter of 2009</a>. Our  national debt will then be close to 49% of GDP.</p>
<p>If there is an easing of credit in the economy, and borrowers come to market with the pent-up demand that has not been met for the past year, the competition for funds will raise interest rates. Higher interest rates will counter any stimulus effect from government programs.</p>
<p>Who will buy U.S. Treasury debt if the world is less apprehensive about credit quality? Lenders will once again seek higher returns, potentially forcing the Treasury Department to increase its rates. The potential of this event may sink the dollar if investors perceive that the U.S. economy is stagnant and the world is awash in dollars. The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yield_curve">yield curve</a> – the spread between the Treasury’s two-year and the 10-year paper – has been steepening. A steepening yield curve, where short-term borrowing costs are low and long-term rates considerably higher, is good for banks that borrow short and lend long.</p>
<p>But if the perception of risk  diminishes, and the perception of future inflation increases, the <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/invertedyieldcurve.asp">yield curve  will invert</a> and the threat of rising rates will cause a sell-off in the short end of the curve and a rush into longer-dated maturities. Any increase in short-term interest rates would be painful for struggling banks. An <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/invertedyieldcurve.asp">inverted  yield curv</a>e would be devastating, and inevitably would lead to more bank  failures.</p>
<h3>Always a Silver Lining – My  Forecast</h3>
<p>The outlook for the economy is not rosy – and that’s an understatement. But there is a silver lining. Even in the near term, the stock market will present innumerable wealth-creation opportunities.</p>
<ul>
<li>First, there  are plenty of shorting opportunities out there now, and more will present  themselves in the future.</li>
<li>Second, in due course – in perhaps 12-18 months – we will be presented with the investment opportunity of our generation. If President-elect Obama gets it right, and I believe he’s got the potential to bring us all together and get the country through this (and if you’re reading this Mr. President-elect, I’d like to put in my vote for [New York Fed President] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Geithner">Timothy Geithner</a> as next U.S. treasury secretary), American companies will be able to be purchased so cheaply that fortunes will be made. The recovery will not only make us whole, it will make our people and our nation rich again.</li>
</ul>
<p>I have absolutely no doubt that the United States will lead the world back into balance. The sea change that has arrived is the result of the conservative experiment having lost its true moorings, pushing the economy into disaster. Not that a wholesale swinging of the pendulum to the other side would be good. In fact, it would be disastrous. We have the potential to end up with a new, fair, transparent and judiciously regulated environment where capital formation can again spread its wings and the U.S. economy can fly.</p>
<p>There are new hands reaching into the colorful box of beads that comprise the American landscape and economy. From any human perspective, the United States is more than a microcosm of the universe; it is the center of the world as we know it. It will take time to construct the new mandala. We all need to meditate on the process to ensure that the design we embrace will ultimately be inclusive, forward-looking and – like all great art – an inspiration to all who view it.</p></blockquote>
<p>PS. This is a cut-down version of the original Money Morning article, which can be read by clikcing the link below.</p>
<p><a class="titleref" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/11/10/recession/">Source: For the U.S. Economy in the New Year, the Pain Will  Precede the Promise</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/how-this-crisis-could-make-you-a-fortune/8102/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China Stimulus, Troublesome Retail Earnings, Global Economic Woes</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/china-stimulus-troublesome-retail-earnings-global-economic-woes/8106</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/china-stimulus-troublesome-retail-earnings-global-economic-woes/8106#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Infusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic stimulus package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford Motor Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JWN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macy’s Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TWX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=8106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>China unveiled yesterday (Sunday) what it described as a “massive” economic stimulus package – a planned capital infusion of $586 billion that it plans to use to reverse its slowing growth, to loosen credit and to offset slowing global growth by stoking domestic demand.</p>
<p>Xinhua, China’s state-run news agency, said yesterday that the stimulus package represents “a shift long advocated by analysts of the Chinese economy and by some within the government. It comes amid indications that economic growth, exports and various industries are slowing.”</p>
<p>The decision was announced yesterday by the State Council after Premier Wen Jiabao presided over an executive meeting Wednesday. China reported in late October that its economy grew at a less-than-expected rate of 9% in the third&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China unveiled yesterday (Sunday) what it described as a “massive” economic stimulus package – a planned capital infusion of $586 billion that it plans to use to reverse its slowing growth, to loosen credit and to offset slowing global growth by stoking domestic demand.</p>
<p>Xinhua, China’s state-run news agency, said yesterday that the stimulus package represents “a shift long advocated by analysts of the Chinese economy and by some within the government. It comes amid indications that economic growth, exports and various industries are slowing.”</p>
<p>The decision was announced yesterday by the State Council after Premier Wen Jiabao presided over an executive meeting Wednesday. China reported in late October that its economy grew at a less-than-expected rate of 9% in the third quarter – <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/China-lifts-wraps-stimulus-package/story.aspx?guid=%7BA9B776C7-8961-4C92-B15F-15E97470645E%7D">the  fifth straight quarter than growth has slowed</a>, <strong><em>MarketWatch.com</em></strong> reported.</p>
<p>&#8220;As the global outlook deteriorates, we expect Chinese  macro policy to turn increasingly aggressive,&#8221; <strong>Merrill Lynch &amp; Co.  Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mer">MER</a>)</strong> economists T.J. Bond and Ting Lu wrote in a research report Friday. “This is a key theme for China and indeed, the entire Asian region.”</p>
<p>China becomes the latest major country to announce a stimulus package. Governments have been injecting billions of dollars into their economies, as central banks around the world slash interest rates, all in the hope of avoiding a whopper global recession. Just last week, researchers at the <strong>International Monetary Fund (IMF)</strong> said that world growth would slow to a tepid 2.2% next year, down from the 3.7% growth estimated for this year. The IMF forecast for China slashed the growth rate down to 8.5% next year, down from an earlier projection of 9.3%.</p>
<p>Reports are circulating that the U.S. government may be considering another infusion of its own. The urgency could escalate this week after retailers take center stage and announce their third-quarter earnings. <strong>Macy’s Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AM">M</a>),</strong> <strong>Nordstrom’s  Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AJWN">JWN</a>),</strong> <strong>Abercrombie  &amp; Fitch Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AANF">ANF</a>)</strong> and <strong>Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AWMT">WMT</a>)</strong> all are  expected to announce quarterly results.</p>
<p>The retail sales data for October will be released on Friday, though the recent weak sales numbers and earnings announcements should have provided more than fair foreshadowing of the actual monthly results.</p>
<p>Given that consumer spending accounts for 70% of the U.S. economy’s health, don’t anticipate great numbers. And don’t assume these are the worst we’ll see.</p>
<h3>Market Matters</h3>
<p>With traders predicting  a victory by Democrat Barack Obama, the major markets jumped by more than 3% on  election day and the <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI">Dow  Jones Industrial Average</a> closed at a four-week high. International stocks  also climbed in anticipation of real “change” coming to the White House.</p>
<p>The euphoria was short-lived, however, as the economic realities returned “the morning after.”  Domestic indexes plunged 10% over the next two sessions in volatile trading.  Cisco Systems Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=csco">CSCO</a>), Time Warner Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ATWX">TWX</a>), and News Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ANWS.A">NWS</a>) became the latest companies to  disappoint on quarterly earnings.   Likewise, General Motors Corp.  (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=gm">GM</a>) and Ford Motor Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=f">F</a>) announced larger than expected losses and dismal sales results for October as execs presented a dire picture of the entire industry.  Circuit City Stores Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=cc">CC</a>) started closing stores; Goldman Sachs Group (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=gs">GS</a>) began handing out pink slips; JP Morgan Chase &amp; Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=jpm">JPM</a>) announced plans to modify mortgage  loans for delinquent borrowers.</p>
<p>Weak economic releases (see below) prompted oil prices to plummet again on enhanced recession concerns; the price of gasoline pushed below $2.40 per gallon – reaching its lowest level since early 2007.  For now, inflation does not appear to be a problem.  As for the President-elect, no one ever said it would be easy.  (Then again,<strong> </strong>optimists note, many of the same fears we face now were present back in 1992 when a relatively unknown Democratic president was elected and his party also controlled Congress. The Dow soared more than 200% during the President Bill Clinton years, the strongest performance in the post-World War II era. We also ended with a budget surplus – but that, at least, may be too much to ask for).</p>
<h1>Weekly Market Data</h1>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="472">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Market/ Index</strong></td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Year Close    (2007)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Qtr Close    (09/30/08)</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous    Week</strong><br />
<strong>(10/31/08)</strong></td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>Current    Week </strong><br />
<strong>(11/07/08)</strong></td>
<td width="124" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Dow Jones Industrial</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">13,264.82</p>
</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">10,850.66</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">9,325.01</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>8,943.81</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="124" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-32.57%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">NASDAQ</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2,652.28</p>
</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2,091.88</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,720.95</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>1,647.40</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="124" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-37.89%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,468.36</p>
</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1,164.74</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">968.75</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>930.99</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="124" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-36.60%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Russell 2000</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">766.03</p>
</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">679.58</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">537.52</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>505.79</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="124" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-33.97%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Fed Funds</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">4.25%</p>
</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">2.0%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">1.00%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>1.00%</strong></p>
</td>
<td width="124" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-325 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">10 yr Treasury (Yield)</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">4.04%</p>
</td>
<td width="68" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.83%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right">3.97%</p>
</td>
<td width="66" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>3.78%</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td width="124" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">
<p align="right"><strong>-26 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Economic Matters</h3>
<p>A hectic week on the economic calendar unfortunately brought little for investors (and the President-elect) to cheer about. The manufacturing sector appears to be in far worse shape than previously thought as the ISM index plunged to its lowest level in 26 years.  Two days later, that same <a href="http://www.ism.ws/">Institute for Supply Management</a> reported that the services sector was weakening, as well. Retailers remained very apprehensive about the holidays and the poorest October sales results since 1969 did nothing to relieve those fears.  <strong>JC Penney</strong> <strong>Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=jcp">JCP</a>)</strong> and <strong>Nordstrom’s</strong> reduced their earnings  projections and only discounter <strong>Wal-Mart</strong> seemed to benefit from the uncertain times.</p>
<p>As for the highly anticipated unemployment releases, we found that during the month of October, the country shed another 240,000 jobs, its tenth straight month of labor contraction, bringing the year-to-date total losses to 1.2 million. Even worse, the losses appear to be accelerating.</p>
<p>Last month’s unemployment rate skyrocketed to 6.5% (from 6.1% in September) and now stands at its highest level since March 1994. Additionally, recruiting firm <strong>Challenger Gray &amp; Christmas</strong> reported soaring layoffs (+79%) over the past 12-months, and payroll provider <strong>Automated  Data Processing (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=adp">ADP</a></strong><strong>)</strong> revealed that the private sector suffered its largest monthly job contraction since December 2001. The dismal labor picture all but confirms a second consecutive quarter of negative growth (GDP), which translates into full-fledged recession. When individuals worry about their jobs, they don’t spend. Retailers suffer, manufacturers suffer, and the overall economy suffers.</p>
<p>We’re  already seeing all of this – and there’s more to come.</p>
<p>Overseas, the world’s Central Banks followed in the Federal Reserves’ footsteps by dropping their key lending rates in attempts to jumpstart their respective economies. As <strong><em><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links">Money Morning</a></em></strong> reported, the ECB (European Central  Bank) <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/11/06/ecb-rate-cut/">cut its  key interest rate by half a percentage point</a> to 3.25%, while the Bank of England took surprising action by reducing its rate by one-and-a-half percentage points to take it down to 3.0% &#8211; an attempt at countering the impact of its rapidly falling housing prices and the ongoing credit crisis.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="305">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Release</strong></td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>Comments </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">November    3</td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Construction Spending    (09/08)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Smaller than expected decline in construction    activity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">ISM &#8211; Manu Index (10/08)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Worst    manufacturing reading in 26 years</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">November    4</td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Factory Orders (09/08)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">2nd    consecutive monthly decline</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">November    5</td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">ISM – Services (10/08)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Sharp    slowdown in non-manufacturing activity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">November    6</td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims    (10/25/08)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Elevated    level of both initial and continuing claims</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">November    7</td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Unemployment Rate (10/08)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Highest    level since 1994</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Nonfarm Payroll Additions    (10/08)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">10th    consecutive month of labor contraction</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong> </strong></td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Consumer Credit (09/08)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Surprising    increase in borrowing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"><strong> </strong></td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">November    13</td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Initial Jobless Claims (11/01/08)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Balance of Trade (09/08)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="69" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">November    14</td>
<td width="95" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000">Retail Sales (10/08)</td>
<td width="133" valign="top" bordercolor="#000000"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Source: <a class="titleref" href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/11/10/china-stimulus/">China Stimulus, Troublesome Retail Earnings Point to  Escalating Global Economic Woes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/china-stimulus-troublesome-retail-earnings-global-economic-woes/8106/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retail Stocks Are Ripe For Shorting</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/retail-stocks-are-ripe-for-shorting/7674</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/retail-stocks-are-ripe-for-shorting/7674#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Lass</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Lass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumper spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JWN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[put options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail slump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shorting Stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock investing strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/?p=7674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Adam Lass says the vast majority of retailers are ripe for shorting as a new era of thrift grips the US. Aside from bargain stores like <strong>Wal-Mart </strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=Wal-Mart" target="_blank">WMT</a>) and the <strong>99 Cents Only Store </strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=99+Cents+Only+Store" target="_blank">NDN</a>), Adam says investors should buy put options on retail firms. And the best time to do this is when they talk of &#8220;better times to come&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>This from <a href="http://www.taipanpublishing.com"  class="alinks_links">Taipan</a> Publishing:</p>
<blockquote><p>
’Tis the season of too damn many  cocktail parties. I simply don’t have the stamina for so much small talk and  gossip, and don’t much care for finger food – or weak drinks. </p>
<p>But this time of year they are simply unavoidable (i.e., my  wife makes me go). And so, all too often, I am forced to put&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam Lass says the vast majority of retailers are ripe for shorting as a new era of thrift grips the US. Aside from bargain stores like <strong>Wal-Mart </strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=Wal-Mart" target="_blank">WMT</a>) and the <strong>99 Cents Only Store </strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=99+Cents+Only+Store" target="_blank">NDN</a>), Adam says investors should buy put options on retail firms. And the best time to do this is when they talk of &#8220;better times to come&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>This from <a href="http://www.taipanpublishing.com"  class="alinks_links">Taipan</a> Publishing:</p>
<blockquote><p>
’Tis the season of too damn many  cocktail parties. I simply don’t have the stamina for so much small talk and  gossip, and don’t much care for finger food – or weak drinks. </p>
<p>But this time of year they are simply unavoidable (i.e., my  wife makes me go). And so, all too often, I am forced to put down my tumbler of  12-year old single malt and my dog-eared edition of Gibbon’s <em>Decline and  Fall</em>, abandon my armchair, and trade the comfortable sweater and slippers  of the misanthrope for the sport jacket and slacks of the supposedly social.</p>
<p>Fortunately, human beings are unable to recall the sensation  of pain (it’s true: look it up). And so most of these events are immediately  forgotten. However, I attended such an odd gathering the other night that is  has stuck in my mind.</p>
<p>It wasn’t exactly seasonal per se. Nor was it another of  those “buying parties” wherein we are feted with Vienna sausage and crab dip  while a dowager of indistinct age pitches time shares in Boca, jewelry or  Tupperware party bowls. (I’m told that one such get together saw the  demonstration of a line of risqué undergarments. However, I was not invited to  that one. And it’s probably just as well.)</p>
<p><strong>Getting Rid of Excess Baggage</strong></p>
<p>In many ways, in fact, it was the harbinger either of a new  age or perhaps the return to an older age. You see, the ladies were there not  to buy, but rather to sell stuff. Specifically, excess gold jewelry. </p>
<p>Please keep in mind that I do not live in a poorer quarter.  Our town’s historical Main Street has no pawnshops nestled amongst its antique  dealers. (It does have a rather nice used bookstore, though, where I recently  stumbled upon a lovely 1930 edition of Voltaire’s<em>Candide</em>.)</p>
<p>And yet, our hostess had invited an assessor of used gold  items – a man prepared to dole out cash (checks really) for broken chains,  undersized rings and mismatched earrings. </p>
<p>Having nothing to offer the gentleman beyond my wedding ring  (and I am not that greedy – or stupid), I abandoned the living room to the  ladies and joined the other spouses around the downstairs wet bar.</p>
<div>
<div style="border: 1px solid #debe7c; padding: 4px; background: #f2ead7 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; width: 490px; text-align: left;">
<div style="text-align:left;padding:10px;border:1px solid #DEBE7C;background:#F2EAD7"> </p>
<p><strong>Have You Heard About the “Black Widow Trade”? </strong></p>
<p> Here’s how you can turn Wall Street’s PAIN into a 146% GAIN in 12 weeks. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.isecureonline.com/reports/WOW/WWOWJA08/" target="_blank">Read on now for detailed trading instructions…</a><br />
</p>
<p> </div>
</div>
</div>
<p><br />
</p>
<p><strong>The New “Rich”</strong></p>
<p>Even here, I witnessed a marked shift in the conversation.  Gone was the usual bragging about the size of one’s new house. So too, the  crowing of recent market gains. (No shock there!) The horsepower of this year’s  offering from Cadillac? Fuggeddaboudit!</p>
<p>Instead, the hot subject was the new frugality. One gent was  touting how he could up his Honda’s gas mileage by coasting to stop lights.  Another was alerting everyone to a large discount on driveway macadam from a  building supplier in the next county. </p>
<p>A third fellow was all full of vinegar as to how he had just  dressed down his teenaged daughter about her grades: “She won’t qualify for a  college grant if she gets another B in economics.” </p>
<p>Even more disorienting: Suddenly, my hoary old scold (meant  solely to discourage further financial inquisition) that “the best gain the  average investor could hope to achieve could be had by paying off his credit  cards” was the talk of the room! </p>
<p>Can it be that “cheap” is the new “rich?” </p>
<p><strong>The American Wallet Snaps Shut</strong></p>
<p>Certainly my neighbors are not unique. Gob-smacked by years  of rising prices, the American wallet has finally snapped shut. Consumer  spending in September fell some 0.3%, the largest single month drop in the past  four years. Add in July and August, and you have the “worst” quarter in 28  years.</p>
<p>I have put quotes around <em>worst</em>, because the true  historical value of this sea change has yet to be determined. We may be  witnessing the demise of our great consumer culture. </p>
<p>This is disastrous news for those who are tied closely to  the many endeavors that depend desperately on the American need for new  crap. </p>
<p>Which companies might tumble when pointless spending falls  from grace? Certainly the direct purveyors of chromed junk are already suffering  mightily. </p>
<p><strong>Detroit Still Can’t Buy a Clue</strong></p>
<p><strong>GM </strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AGM" target="_blank">GM</a>) and Chrysler are attempting to figure out  which one has enough loose cash left to buy out the other. Borrowing for the  deal in this ultra-tight credit market is simply out of the question. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, poor old <strong>Ford </strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AF" target="_blank">F</a>)<strong> </strong>is still banking on  selling one more generation of humongous pickup trucks to commuters and  construction workers who aren’t even sure if they have a job to commute to.</p>
<p>And speaking of borrowing, GM’s once mighty (indeed sole) profit  center, GMAC, is trying to redefine itself as a bank holding company so as to  qualify for a piece of Washington’s trillion-dollar largesse.</p>
<p><strong>The Only Profits in This Vast Empty Space</strong></p>
<p>It appears that various other sellers of overpriced  bric-a-brac and gewgaws are in the soup as well. The only players in the retail  “space” who have shown any strength at all during this “season of saving” are  <strong>Wal-Mart </strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=Wal-Mart" target="_blank">WMT</a>) and the <strong>99 Cents Only Store </strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=99+Cents+Only+Store" target="_blank">NDN</a>). </p>
<p>The rest, from high to low, <strong>Nordstrom </strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=Nordstrom" target="_blank">JWN</a>) to <strong>Kohl’s </strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:KSS" target="_blank">KSS</a>), are hemorrhaging red ink all over the New York trading floor.</p>
<p>Looking to the near term, most of American retail still  looks like viable short candidates. My recommendation: Buy puts every time  these guys poke their heads out of their little rat holes to spin their little  tales of “better times coming in January.”</p>
<p><strong>A Change in Values?</strong></p>
<p>However, any old veteran of tighter times and previous ideas  as to the value of thrift, might very well view the sudden decrease in  spending, increase in wages, and spike in actual savings (Real savings!  Remember them?) as a sign of better times to come. </p>
<p>Can you imagine a time when bankers were the type of men you  could actually trust with your savings? Or how about a market that valued  companies that actually made profits by providing genuinely valuable goods and  services? </p>
<p>Goodness. The cherishing of True Value could even mean the  end of shallow Technical Analysis! </p>
<p>Naaah: Never gonna  happen.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.taipanpublishinggroup.com/component/option,com_sectionex/Itemid,56/id,29/view,category/">Source: The Return of Real American Value?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/retail-stocks-are-ripe-for-shorting/7674/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>With OPEC Meeting Looming, and Emerging Markets Growing, Oil Prices May Only be Temporary</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/with-opec-meeting-looming-and-emerging-markets-growing-oil-prices-may-only-be-temporary/5226</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/with-opec-meeting-looming-and-emerging-markets-growing-oil-prices-may-only-be-temporary/5226#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford Motor Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hedge Fund Research Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JWN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korea Development Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ospraie Management LP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Jobless Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/with-opec-meeting-looming-and-emerging-markets-growing-oil-prices-may-only-be-temporary/5226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Analysts are trumpeting the recent drop in oil prices as a step toward normalcy. But is this celebration premature? Or perhaps even misplaced? After all, we all know that over the long  haul, energy prices are headed in only one direction &#8211; higher.</p>
<p>Crude oil plunged 8% to close at $106.23 a barrel last week &#8211; reaching its lowest level in five months &#8211; as the U.S. dollar strengthened to its highest point against the European euro so far this year. Crude oil prices actually declined for six straight days &#8211; the longest stretch since they did so from April 30, 2007 to May 7, 2007.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/weekly_petroleum_status_report/current/txt/wpsr.txt">U.S. fuel demand</a> dropped 3.5% during the past four weeks.  And unemployment spiked much more than economists&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Analysts are trumpeting the recent drop in oil prices as a step toward normalcy. But is this celebration premature? Or perhaps even misplaced? After all, we all know that over the long  haul, energy prices are headed in only one direction &#8211; higher.</p>
<p>Crude oil plunged 8% to close at $106.23 a barrel last week &#8211; reaching its lowest level in five months &#8211; as the U.S. dollar strengthened to its highest point against the European euro so far this year. Crude oil prices actually declined for six straight days &#8211; the longest stretch since they did so from April 30, 2007 to May 7, 2007.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/weekly_petroleum_status_report/current/txt/wpsr.txt">U.S. fuel demand</a> dropped 3.5% during the past four weeks.  And unemployment spiked much more than economists had predicted. Even so, oil prices are still 41% higher than they were a year ago.</p>
<p>&#8220;Demand destruction and the strength of the dollar are tailor-made to send  oil prices lower,&#8221; Daniel Flynn, a broker with <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=13215636">Alaron Trading Corp.</a> in Chicago, told <strong><em>Bloomberg News</em></strong>. &#8220;If it weren’t for the active  hurricane season, prices would be below $100.&#8221;</p>
<p>Investors looking to hedge against the dollar’s decline earlier this year helped lead crude oil, gold, corn and gasoline to records. The situation reversed over the past month as the dollar rallied against the euro.</p>
<p>But the question now becomes: How will OPEC react?</p>
<p>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organization_of_the_Petroleum_Exporting_Countries">Organization  of the Petroleum Exporting Countries</a>, the cartel of 13 countries that supply 40% of the world’s oil, are scheduled to meet tomorrow (Tuesday) in Vienna. Iran and Venezuela &#8211; two of the perennial wild cards &#8211; have called for supply reductions because crude prices have plunged 28% from the record peak of $147.27 reached July 11.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think there’s a chance that next week could be very interesting because of the OPEC meeting,” said Christopher Edmonds, the managing principal of FIG Partners Energy Research &amp; Capital Group in Atlanta, told <strong><em>Bloomberg</em></strong>.  &#8220;It doesn’t look like OPEC will cut quotas, but they are likely to try to boost  prices with rhetoric.&#8221;</p>
<p>Typically, oil and gas prices decline after Labor Day as the return to school means families will be taking fewer vacations, while cooler temperatures translate into reduced energy demand.</p>
<p>The direction that oil prices take this time around, however, could be determined by Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest oil producer and the cartel’s key (most influential) player. Back in June and July, in an effort to blunt the soaring escalation in oil prices, Saudi Arabia opted to unilaterally boost its output by half a million barrels per day.</p>
<p>&#8220;Where Saudi Arabia is in this debate is crucially important &#8211; that’s our  lynch-pin,” Jan Stuart, oil economist at <strong>UBS Securities LLC (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=ubs&amp;hl=en">UBS</a>)</strong> in New York, said in a radio interview. Saudi King Abdullah &#8220;is on record [as] saying $100 [per barrel] is too high, but that was a little while ago. We don’t know what the Saudis are ready to defend and we do know the Saudis are the ones that would have to do most of the production cutting.&#8221;</p>
<p>No matter what happens to oil prices in the near term, the long-term outlook is clear: Over the longer term, oil and gasoline prices are going to rise.</p>
<p>Let’s face it &#8211; they have to. We’re talking Econ 101 here. Anytime you increase the demand for a commodity &#8211; and don’t increase the supply &#8211; the price is going to head higher. And the oil that’s in the ground now around the world is all that there is.</p>
<p>Emerging economies such as China and India will stoke global demand for oil, monopolizing supplies and forcing global petroleum prices higher.</p>
<p>No matter what happens in the interim, the long-term script is set &#8211; so  invest accordingly.</p>
<p>Looking ahead to the rest of this week, the economic  calendar initially appears light. Friday brings two key reports:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Analysts expect August retail sales data to confirm lackluster consumer activity, though some are hopeful that parents used the last of those tax rebates for some late school shopping.</li>
<li>And       the August <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Producer_price_index">Producer       Price Index</a> (PPI) also will be over-analyzed as investors determine how declining energy costs will impact the overall inflation picture.  The core data may not yet reflect lower oil and gas prices working their ways through other sectors of the economy.  (Bear in mind, many economists prefer to focus more on the core numbers, which exclude the volatile food-and-energy prices).</li>
</ul>
<p>U.S. Federal Reserve policymakers are set to meet again on Sept. 16, so pundits will begin prognosticating in earnest, though most expect central bank policymakers to follow the lead of the European central bankers and stand pat on interest rates.</p>
<h3>Market Matters</h3>
<p>Last week had the potential to be a &#8220;perfect  storm&#8221; for stock-market bulls.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/09/03/oil-prices-3/">Hurricane Gustav  had very little significant impact on energy platforms in the Gulf</a> and most cities suffered little more than some wind, rain and power outages. Commodity prices continued their freefall and consumers soon should have a few extra bucks in their pockets (in time for the holidays) as gas and food become more affordable.  Republicans &#8211; historically the party of Wall Street &#8211; <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/09/03/john-mccain/">kicked off their  political pep rally</a> with a one-time Democratic leader (turned attack dog) bashing the opposition and a self-described hockey mom rejuvenating the base. Even so, the euphoria never came as some weaker-than-expected economic releases (see below) brought the bears out of hibernation.</p>
<p>Once Gustav was out of the picture (for the most part), oil resumed its decline. A stronger dollar and prospects for weaker global demand have contributed to the dramatic price reversal. Other commodities followed suit as gold, copper, aluminum and steel have experienced similar fates, leading to mixed expectations about the ultimate impact on the domestic economy.  On one hand, the lower raw material prices could prove positive for consumers and businesses alike as they lead to lower inflationary fears and the manufacturing of more affordable goods and services.  On the other hand, the price plunge could signify lower demand for such goods and services and the stronger dollar makes exports to our global trading partners more expensive at a time when they, too, are struggling. While both scenarios have merit, diminishing inflation should be well received at home and could make the Fed’s challenging job much easier down the road.</p>
<p>Then there’s the financial-services sector. While some analysts expect financials to rebound from their credit-crisis-induced Ice Age, the news of the week gave little indication that the worst is behind them. <strong>Goldman Sachs  Group Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=gs">GS</a>)</strong> lowered its rating on <strong>Merrill Lynch  &amp; Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mer&amp;hl=en">MER</a>) </strong>to<strong> </strong>&#8220;Sell,&#8221; on the belief  that more write-downs (as if $5.7 billion was not enough) were in the  cards.  <strong><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN0245078920080902">Ospraie  Management LP</a></strong> closed one of its primary hedge funds, as some bad calls on commodities resulted in almost a 40% decline in the fund’s value.  In fact, hedge funds, in general, are moving more and more out of favor.  According to the <strong><a href="http://www.hedgefundresearch.com/">Hedge Fund Research Inc.</a></strong>, during the first six months of the year, only $29 billion in new dollars flowed into these non-traditional assets, compared to almost $120 billion over the same period in 2007.  <strong>Lehman  Brothers</strong> <strong>Holdings Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=leh&amp;hl=en">LEH</a>)</strong> is still  attracting suitors; with <strong><a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=708702">Korea Development Bank</a></strong> and possibly <strong>HSBC Holdings</strong> <strong>PLC  (ADR: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AHBC">HBC</a>)</strong> seem to be among the more interested parties.</p>
<p>Outside of financials, <strong>Google Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=goog&amp;hl=en">GOOG</a>)</strong> announced the development of Chrome, a new Internet browser to compete with <strong>Microsoft Corp.’s (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=msft&amp;hl=en">MSFT</a>) </strong>Internet<strong> </strong>Explorer.</p>
<p>The auto sector continued its struggles with <strong>General Motors Corp. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=gm&amp;hl=en">GM</a>)</strong> (-20%), <strong>Ford</strong> <strong>Motor Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=f&amp;hl=en">F</a>) </strong>(-27%) and <strong>Toyota</strong> <strong>Motor Corp. (ADR: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:TM">TM</a>)</strong> (-9.4%) all reporting sluggish sales. Troubling retail and labor data (see below) caused major fears about the economy to resurface.  As is often the case, bonds were the beneficiary of a flight-to-quality move by investors, meaning the yield on the 10-year fell below 3.7%.  Can we still blame light summer volume for the exaggerated price moves?  No &#8211; not after Labor Day.</p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="450">
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="141"><strong>Market/Index</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous    Week</strong><br />
<strong>(08/29/08)</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="center"><strong>Current    Week </strong><br />
<strong>(09/05/08)</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="84">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD    Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="141">Dow Jones    Industrial</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right">11,543.96</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right"><strong>11,220.96</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="84">
<p align="right"><strong>-15.41%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="141">NASDAQ</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right">2,367.52</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right"><strong>2,255.88</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="84">
<p align="right"><strong>-14.95%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="141">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right">1,282.83</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right"><strong>1,242.31</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="84">
<p align="right"><strong>-15.39%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="141">Russell 2000</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right">739.50</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right"><strong>718.85</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="84">
<p align="right"><strong>-6.16%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="141">Fed Funds</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right">2.00%</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right"><strong>2.00%</strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="84">
<p align="right"><strong>-225 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="141">10 yr Treasury    (Yield)</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right">3.81%</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right"><strong>3.66%</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="84">
<p align="right"><strong>-38 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/with-opec-meeting-looming-and-emerging-markets-growing-oil-prices-may-only-be-temporary/5226/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weak Labor Market and Slowing Retail Sales Put U.S. Stocks in a Tailspin</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/weak-labor-market-and-slowing-retail-sales-put-us-stocks-in-a-tailspin/5189</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/weak-labor-market-and-slowing-retail-sales-put-us-stocks-in-a-tailspin/5189#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Yousfi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Yousfi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JWN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Jobless Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/weak-labor-market-and-slowing-retail-sales-put-us-stocks-in-a-tailspin/5189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="entry">The U.S. markets took a beating yesterday (Thursday) as  retail sales sputtered and jobless claims surged.  At the New York close, the blue-chip <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=983582">Dow Jones Industrial  Average Index</a> had posted a loss of 344.65 points (-2.99%), to trade at  11,188.23. The tech-laden <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=13756934">Nasdaq Composite Index</a> dropped 74.69 points (-3.20%), to reach 2,259.04. And the broader <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=626307">Standard &#38; Poor’s 500  Index</a> lost 38.16 points (-2.99%), to settle at 1,236.82.</p>
<p>Disappointing August retail sales reinforced that the surprising 3.3% boost in U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) in the second quarter, due in large part to the government’s stimulus checks, won’t be repeated in the third.</p>
<p>Discount retailers such as Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AWMT">WMT</a>), which saw a 3%  increase in same-store sales in August, continue to do well.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="entry">The U.S. markets took a beating yesterday (Thursday) as  retail sales sputtered and jobless claims surged.  At the New York close, the blue-chip <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=983582">Dow Jones Industrial  Average Index</a> had posted a loss of 344.65 points (-2.99%), to trade at  11,188.23. The tech-laden <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=13756934">Nasdaq Composite Index</a> dropped 74.69 points (-3.20%), to reach 2,259.04. And the broader <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=626307">Standard &amp; Poor’s 500  Index</a> lost 38.16 points (-2.99%), to settle at 1,236.82.</p>
<p>Disappointing August retail sales reinforced that the surprising 3.3% boost in U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) in the second quarter, due in large part to the government’s stimulus checks, won’t be repeated in the third.</p>
<p>Discount retailers such as Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AWMT">WMT</a>), which saw a 3%  increase in same-store sales in August, continue to do well. But upscale  retailers like Nordstrom Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AJWN">JWN</a>), which saw an 8%  decline in sales for the month, are struggling.</p>
<p>The retail sales figures matched the U.S. Federal Reserve’s findings in its Beige Book report released this week. Strapped consumers continue to spend on consumer staples but are forgoing pricier, discretionary purchases.</p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/04/AR2008090401639_2.html?hpid=topnews">Consumer  spending was reported to be slow in most districts</a>, with purchasing  concentrated on necessary items and retrenchment in discretionary spending,”  said the Beige Book, the <strong><em>Washington Post</em></strong> reported. The report is  put together based on economic reports from the Fed’s 12 districts across the  nation.</p>
<p>In a separate report also released yesterday, the Labor Department announced new unemployment claims increased 15,000, bringing, the total to 444,000, well above the 425,000 expected according to <strong><em>Reuters </em></strong>data.</p>
<p>“<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=ajfJ4VqD9S_Q&amp;refer=home">It’s  going to be a while before people regain confidence in the economy and the  market</a>,” John Carey, a Boston-based money manager at Pioneer Investment  Management, which oversees about $300 billion, told <strong><em>Bloomberg News</em></strong>. “The latest retail sales and jobless claims numbers and earnings reports don’t give people the sense that we’re about to turn the corner.”</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/09/05/august-retail-sales/">Weak  Labor Market and Slowing Retail Sales Put U.S. Stocks in a Tailspin</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/weak-labor-market-and-slowing-retail-sales-put-us-stocks-in-a-tailspin/5189/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Reserve Policymakers Will Hold the Line on Interest Rates &#8211; At Least for Now</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/federal-reserve-policymakers-will-hold-the-line-on-interest-rates-at-least-for-now/4463</link>
		<comments>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/federal-reserve-policymakers-will-hold-the-line-on-interest-rates-at-least-for-now/4463#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Patalon III</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JWN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SKS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Patalon III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/federal-reserve-policymakers-will-hold-the-line-on-interest-rates-at-least-for-now/4463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With oil trading near a three-month low (and corn now at a four-month low), U.S. Federal Reserve policymakers may have just the ammunition they need to hold the line on interest rates for the foreseeable future &#8211; or at least until their Sept. 16 policymaking meeting.</p>
<p class="entry">On the other hand, threats of hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico and geopolitical turmoil in Iraq, Turkey, Nigeria &#8211; and now the fireworks between Russia and Georgia &#8211; could spark a dramatic reversal in sentiment and renew fears of supply disruptions.</p>
<p>However, this week’s economic calendar contains the types of reports that will factor into the musings of Federal Reserve policymakers with regards to interest rates.</p>
<p>The report on the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_Price_Index">Consumer Price Index</a> (CPI) for July &#8211;&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With oil trading near a three-month low (and corn now at a four-month low), U.S. Federal Reserve policymakers may have just the ammunition they need to hold the line on interest rates for the foreseeable future &#8211; or at least until their Sept. 16 policymaking meeting.</p>
<p class="entry">On the other hand, threats of hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico and geopolitical turmoil in Iraq, Turkey, Nigeria &#8211; and now the fireworks between Russia and Georgia &#8211; could spark a dramatic reversal in sentiment and renew fears of supply disruptions.</p>
<p>However, this week’s economic calendar contains the types of reports that will factor into the musings of Federal Reserve policymakers with regards to interest rates.</p>
<p>The report on the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_Price_Index">Consumer Price Index</a> (CPI) for July &#8211; due out Thursday &#8211; gives economists another look into domestic price pressures, although the recent drop in energy prices will not yet be reflected in this data.  Then again, economists tend to focus only on so-called &#8220;core&#8221; inflation (which &#8220;excludes volatile food-and-energy prices,&#8221; anyway).</p>
<p>The July retail sales report gives us some additional insight into the consumer mindset, demonstrating that those tax rebates are virtually all gone. With gas prices on the decline, consumers should have a bit more available disposable income in the months ahead (though, again, the July numbers may not show any enhanced activity just yet).</p>
<p>Additional confirmation of the recent consumer cautiousness should come from the next round of earnings reports, which will feature reports from such retailers as <strong>Macy’s</strong> <strong>Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AM">M</a>)</strong>, <strong>J.C. Penney Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=jcp&amp;hl=en">JCP</a>)</strong>, <strong>Nordstrom Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=jwn&amp;hl=en">JWN</a>)</strong>, and <strong>Wal-Mart  Stores Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=wmt&amp;hl=en">WMT</a>)</strong>.  Should the gas trend continue, consumers could emerge from hibernation just in time for the holiday shopping season… wishful thinking?</p>
<h3>Market Matters</h3>
<p><strong><em>L</em></strong><strong><em>et  the games begin</em></strong>. As host  of the <a href="http://beijing2008-olympicgames.info/">2008 Summer Olympic  Games</a>, Mainland China takes center stage and gets the chance to show the rest of the world that it has arrived as a global player and an economic superpower. Of course, no event should be more apolitical than the Olympics.  That is, until China banned some participants for their support of Darfur.  And before U.S. President George W. Bush criticized China’s poor record of human rights on the eve of the games. And before China deported a few activists who were demonstrating against certain national policies. (Probably nothing that a few gold medals won’t cure.)</p>
<p>Speaking of having politics cross over into the economy: Last week, Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama publicly lobbied for the sale of 70 million barrels of oil from the U.S. strategic reserve and also claimed to now support new offshore drilling (if his tire gauge idea fails to prove an effective policy).  As the presidential-election campaigns accelerate into the home stretch, investors can expect plenty of promises (and flip-flopping) from both sides of the aisle.  (How do you feel about those Bush tax cuts this week, Senator McCain?)</p>
<p>So just where are investors to  turn these days?  <strong>Freddie Mac (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=fre&amp;hl=en">FRE</a>)</strong> and <strong>Fannie Mae (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=fnm&amp;hl=en">FNM</a>) </strong>returned to the headlines last week, as both reported significant losses &#8211; far in excess of Wall Street expectations.  (Weren’t those analysts following the news?)  Likewise, insurance giant <strong>American  International Group Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=aig&amp;hl=en">AIG</a>)</strong> reported  its third consecutive quarterly loss as its mortgage portfolio remained deeply  under water.  <strong>Citigroup Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=c&amp;hl=en">C</a>)</strong>, <strong>Merrill Lynch &amp; Co. Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=mer&amp;hl=en">MER</a>)</strong> and <strong>UBS</strong> <strong>AG (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AUBS">UBS</a>)</strong> each reached multi-billion settlements with the New York state attorney general over certain high-risk securities that the firms will buy back from affected investors. Outside of financials, <strong>Cisco Systems  Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=csco&amp;hl=en">CSCO</a>)</strong> &#8211; the subject of a recent &#8220;<a href="file:///%5C%5Csun%5CUserData%5CBHolmes%5Cdaily%5CBuy,%20Sell%20or%20Hold:%20Cisco%20Systems%20Inc.">Buy,  Sell or Hold</a>&#8221; feature in <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com"  class="alinks_links">Money Morning</a> &#8211; provided a boost to techs <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/08/07/cisco-earnings/">by announcing  better-than-expected profits</a>; likewise, <strong>The Procter &amp; Gamble Co. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=pg&amp;hl=en">PG</a>) </strong>proved that  consumer companies could still thrive, despite surging commodity prices.</p>
<p>Institutional funds have garnered additional interest as of late as investors seek out non-traditional asset classes to help compensate for the challenges of the markets.  In July, <strong><a href="http://www.hedgefundresearch.com/">Hedge Fund Research Inc.</a></strong> reported that the return on a basket of 60 funds designed to reflect the industry as a whole declined by about 3%, the worst monthly showing in six years.  <strong><a href="https://www.tudorfunds.com/TUDOR/WEB/me.get?web.home&amp;SSLREDIRECT=a4f83b04cdb5ab814fea5f801b5599f6b7b97109c0a102b19b1d85485d3d">Tutor  Investment Corp</a></strong>. will be spinning off its Raptor fund at year-end after bad calls on the energy sector caused ongoing losses for the past two years.  Private equity firm, <strong>Fortress Investment Group LLC (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=Fortress+Investment+Group&amp;hl=en">FIG</a>)</strong>, reported a larger-than-expected quarterly loss and has seen its share price drop about 40% since its IPO in early 2007.  Bear in mind, not all hedge funds and non-traditional assets are created equal; plenty of &#8220;winners&#8221; have emerged lately.</p>
<p>Anyone remember when oil touched $147 a barrel on July 11?  Has the bubble officially burst?  Energy continued its downward spiral as oil fell below $117 barrel, its lowest level since early May.  Rising inventories eased supply/demand concerns and renewed strength in the dollar also helped support domestic securities (thanks to the European Central Bank &#8211; see below).  Equity market volatility remained as investors tried to weigh the negative Freddie/Fannie reports against the positive energy trend (and the inactivity of Federal Reserve policymakers with regards to interest rates &#8211; also see below). Stocks alternatively soared, plunged, and soared again as the major indexes moved considerably higher by end of last week.</p>
<p>Then there are the ongoing Beijing Summer Olympic Games (which opened Friday), a reminder that every investor should have a China investment strategy.</p>
<p><strong>[<u>Editor’s Note</u>:  Please click here to read the first part of our two-part research report -"<a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/08/08/china-investment/">Why Every  Investor Should Have a China Investment Strategy</a>." The second part of that  report will appear later this week.]</strong></p>
<p>Perhaps that  jubilant Olympic spirit is contagious?   So let the games continue: <strong><em>&#8220;USA…USA…USA…!&#8221;</em></strong></p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="450">
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="141"><strong>Market/Index</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="center"><strong>Previous    Week</strong><br />
<strong>(08/01/08)</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="center"><strong>Current    Week </strong><br />
<strong>(08/08/08)</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="84">
<p align="center"><strong>YTD Change</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="141">Dow Jones Industrial</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right">11,326.32</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right"><strong>11,734.32</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="84">
<p align="right"><strong>-11.54%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="141">NASDAQ</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right">2,310.96</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right"><strong>2,414.10</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="84">
<p align="right"><strong>-8.98%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="141">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right">1,260.31</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right"><strong>1,296.32</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="84">
<p align="right"><strong>-11.72%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="141">Russell 2000</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right">716.14</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right"><strong>734.30</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="84">
<p align="right"><strong>-4.14%</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="141">Fed Funds</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right">2.00%</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right"><strong>2.00%</strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="84">
<p align="right"><strong>-225 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="141">10 yr Treasury (Yield)</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right">3.95%</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="107">
<p align="right"><strong>3.95%</strong><strong> </strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="84">
<p align="right"><strong>-9 bps</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h3>Economically  Speaking</h3>
<p>They came, they debated, they analyzed, and they left &#8211; with no action taken. The &#8220;they&#8221; we refer to here are the members of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), the Federal Reserve policymakers responsible for setting interest rates.</p>
<p>With dueling economic dilemmas impacting the country (slow growth vs. inflation), Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and his band of <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/08/06/the-federal-reserve/">central bank  policymakers chose to leave the benchmark Federal Funds rate unchanged at 2.00%</a> at their policymaking meeting last week.</p>
<p>While most Fed-watchers still expect the next interest-rate move to be to the upside, some believe such an action is unlikely before the end of this year as reduced consumer activity continues to spark talks of recession.  The recent decline in commodity prices helped the Fed stay on the sidelines, given that inflationary pressures are slightly less than before (at least, for the time being).  The European Central Bank (ECB) and Bank of England <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/08/08/ecb-rates/">both left  their key rates unchanged</a> as they also weigh ongoing economic concerns in their countries against continued price pressures.  They prompted a surge in the dollar and took additional pressure off of the Fed, as well.</p>
<p>On the retail front, same store sales in July were lackluster at best as consumer held off on back-to-school purchases and focused on necessities such as food and household goods. (Apparently, last year’s No. 2 pencils and lunchboxes still will work fine.</p>
<p>Even the afore-mentioned <strong>Wal-Mart’s</strong> sales came in slightly below  expectations while mall chains &#8211; the <strong>Limited Brands Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:LTD">LTD</a>)</strong> and <strong>The Gap  Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=gps&amp;hl=en">GPS</a>)</strong> &#8211; and luxury retailers such as <strong>Saks Inc. (<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ASKS">SKS</a>)</strong> all  struggled as consumers no longer had those tax rebates to spend.  Moving to housing, the <strong><a href="http://www.fdic.gov/">Federal Deposit Insurance Corp</a>.  (FDIC)</strong> reported that just under 1% of all prime (not subprime) loans originated in early 2007 were at least 90 days delinquent, meaning that the mortgage crisis still has a ways to go before being resolved (and additional write-downs may be on the way).  The <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/08/08/global-investing-roundups-104/">weekly  jobless claims data</a> showed that more unemployed folks are seeking  government benefits than at any time since March 2002.</p>
<p><strong>Weekly Economic Calendar</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="450">
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="127"><strong>Date</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="204"><strong>Release</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="324"><strong>Comments </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="127">August    4</td>
<td valign="top" width="204">Personal Income/Spending    (06/08)</td>
<td valign="top" width="324">Spending    up on tax rebates</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="127"></td>
<td valign="top" width="204">Factory Order (06/08)</td>
<td valign="top" width="324">Largest    increase since December</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="127">August    5</td>
<td valign="top" width="204">ISM &#8211; Services (07/08)</td>
<td valign="top" width="324">Sector    contraction though not as bad as expected</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="127"></td>
<td valign="top" width="204">Fed Policy Meeting    Statement</td>
<td valign="top" width="324">Left    rates unchanged as expected</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="127">August    6</td>
<td valign="top" width="204">Consumer Credit (06/08)</td>
<td valign="top" width="324">Fastest    pace of borrowing in 7 months</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="127">August    7</td>
<td valign="top" width="204">Initial Jobless Claims (08/02/08)</td>
<td valign="top" width="324">Rose    to a six-year high</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="127"><strong>The Week Ahead</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="204"><strong> </strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="324"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="127">August    12</td>
<td valign="top" width="204">Balance of Trade (06/08)</td>
<td valign="top" width="324"><em> </em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="127">August    13</td>
<td valign="top" width="204">Retail Sales (07/08)</td>
<td valign="top" width="324"><em> </em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="127">August    14</td>
<td valign="top" width="204">CPI (07/08)</td>
<td valign="top" width="324"><em> </em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="127"></td>
<td valign="top" width="204">Initial Jobless Claims    (08/09/08)</td>
<td valign="top" width="324"><em> </em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="127">August    15</td>
<td valign="top" width="204">Industrial Production    (07/08)</td>
<td valign="top" width="324"><em> </em></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Source:  	  <a href="http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/08/11/federal-reserve-policy/">Federal Reserve Policymakers Will Hold the Line on Interest Rates &#8211; At Least for Now</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contrarianprofits.com/articles/federal-reserve-policymakers-will-hold-the-line-on-interest-rates-at-least-for-now/4463/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 2.103 seconds -->
